I have an ASP script that show a big number of record (about 1100 rows) so I have set the Response.buffer value to off.
With Firefox all works fine, the script shows the record one by one while it loads them. The problem is that using Internet Explorer I can see the records only once that all rows are loaded.
I'm experiencing bad performance migrating from IIS 5 to IIS 6 on a server with identical Hardware configuration on some ASP pages.I notice that setting
For... IF x MOD 20 = 0 AND Response.IsClientConnected=false THEN EXIT FOR END IF some code here Next so the FOR...NEXT statement would stop if a client leaves the page or hits the stop button.
But is it pointless when using it with <% Response.Buffer = True %> since it processes the entire page before displaying it to the user.
If response.buffer is set to true, and no response.flush has been executed, is it accurate to expect that my browser should not be rendering the content which I (well Ok, someone else) is sending in response.write statements?
I have an ASP page which is returning so much data that I'm receiving a message that the Response Buffer Limit has exceeded its configured values. Any idea where to find this configured value so I can set it higher?
When I try to print a large table I get "Response Buffer Limit Exceeded". When the table is small, this is not a problem. I am sure that there is no infinite loop, and have tried setting the buffer to false, in addition to occassionally trying to flush the buffer. I can not modify the server settings. What can else can I try? I'd rather not split up my table into multiple pages.
Execution of the ASP page caused the Response Buffer to exceed its configured limit. What does this mean anybody, please. I just thought, OK I am doing this reasonable competently and now this.
I have the following error on a page. I can fix it by making a large-ish block of text (almostr 4k) a little smaller. But what is ASP actually complaining about?
Steve
Response object error 'ASP 0251 : 80004005'
Response Buffer Limit Exceeded
/lsm/TemplateKb2.asp, line 0
Execution of the ASP page caused the Response Buffer to exceed its configured limit.
I have a big asp file that has an error under certain conditions -- totally repeatable. However, it only fails when I set response.buffer = True at the top. WHen I set it False in order to debug it, it works every time! I even set it to True, but did a .Flush just before the error, and the error won't happen.
It only happens when response.buffer is True and no .response.flush is issued.
The error is a string variable turns-up empty and crashes a function requiring a date. I could test for this before the line where it crashes, but where did my data go? Why is the buffer affecting it?
how to create a download buffer? I'll explain a little bit. What I mean by a download buffer is a script that will count how many people are downloading a certain file, then after say 50 or so are downloading that file, it will make everyone else who wants to download it have to wait a certain amount of time(ex. 5 minutes).
I got the idea from Fileplanet.com and Fileshack.com. Seems like a pretty cool system and it appears to be written in asp.net on their sites.
I have over 6000 record in a SQL Server database (in one table) and trying to fetch all these records at once but it always fails. I have tried every thing, increased Script time out function to 300 even to 3000 but still same. Used response.buffer=false too but no change.
When you use response.buffer=true , I realize that anything writeen with response.write will not be outputted until you do response.flush, correct?
With that said, what about this (I don't know if it's the same as response.write or not)
<% if page = 1 then %> (Load pictures 1-20) by using html (not response.write) <% end if %> <% if page = 2 then %> (Load pictures 21-40) by using html (not response.write) <% end if %>
I notice a lag in the page (it stays blank for a second or so before any of the page loads) and I wondered if changing buffer type to true and adding a response.flush between every 5 or so pictures would make that better.
I'm trying to retreive and display a list of showrooms in the United States. The user is presented with a map of the US and an image map has the co-ordinates. The user clicks on a state and "Viola!", all in that state are listed.
It works great, except for two states; California and Florida. On those, I get the following error: Quote: Response object error 'ASP 0251 : 80004005'
Response Buffer Limit Exceeded
/default.asp, line 0
Execution of the ASP page caused the Response Buffer to exceed its configured limit.
There isn't that much data being pulled from the database; only 77 records for Florida, only 122 for California. There aren't that many fields in any of the recordsets, either, and none of them are more than 500 characters in length (all varchar with some int dbtypes.) Code:
In the following code when i = 500 the buffer on the server is flushed to the client. However, because the content that is sent to the browser contains an html table Internet Explorer does not display the table until it receives the closing </table> tag.
The question is, am I correct in saying that the buffer on the server is CLEARED when i = 500? It will be empty for a split second until the loop resumes again. Am I correct? Code:
Are there specific security precautions (input validations for example) that are documented somewhere to prevent hackers from compromising a credit card ASP application? In particular, can we prevent a buffer overflow by using the LEFT function to grab only the necessary characters from the credit card text field?
after looking at someone elses code here I noticed that he always does a Response.End after a Response.Redirect. I was under the impression that code execution would stop on the current page as soon as the Response.Redirect statement appeared, but the guy reckons that the code will continue running on the current page before starting the new one. Can someone give me the definitive answer on this?