My requirement is to rollback a Transaction which acts with (REQUIRED) Transaction Attribute .
How can i tell the container to rollback a transaction when using with CMT in EJB3.0 ...
I have a scenario :
A ) If there is a message driven bean with CMT and transaction attribute required
-begin MDB
-Write to DB
-Send message to queue
-Null pointer exception.
I know this is a system exception , the transaction will be rolled back , which mean all my changes to DB will be rolled back.
But what will happen to the message sent to JMS queue ? It will be removed also ?
B) what will happen if the same above sequence appear with BMT
-Start transaction
-Write to DB
-Send message to queue
-Null pointer exception.
What about my changes at DB and my message at queue ?
public class BankAccount
{
String name;
int accountID;
double balance;
}
public void setAcct ( String nam, double acctID)
[Code] ....
1. Create a class called BankAccount
a. It will be a generic simple type of BankAccount
2. BankAccount will contain variables to store:
a. the owner/owners of the account
b. an account id
c. it may contain other basic information (up to you)
3. BankAccount will contain methods that will allow you to:
a. Set the account owners information
b. Deposit money
c. Withdraw money
d. Set balances
e. Print out transactions (think more like an atm each time an action is taken it gets printed)
4. BankAccount will contain its own main()
a. At least 2 BankAccount objects will be created and ALL of their methods called .
What to do for the print out transactions
When it comes to Java EE I see many developers having trouble with the usage of transactions and exceptions and when to use what.
I see a full chapter of RESTful Web Services, but do you also relate these Web Services to their counterparts (SOAP Web Services)?
Budget program. Here is my situation, I have 2 tabs in a GUI, one tab adds a transactions when the add button is clicked, and in the other tab displays a table showing all the transactions. In my code, I want it so that when the user chooses a deposit(combo box variable name = cbType, indexnumber for deposit is 0) it will add to the total and when the user chooses withdraw(index number is 1) then it will subtract it from the total. Here is the code.... (note as well, the code also adds a new row to the table)
//add button clicked
private class BtnAddActionListener implements ActionListener {
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent arg0) {
((DefaultTableModel)table.getModel()).addRow(new Object[]{
cbMonth.getSelectedItem() + "/" + txtDay.getText() + "/" + cbYear.getSelectedItem(),
cbCategory.getSelectedItem(),
[Code] .....
So when I tested the program with 2 transactions, the first transaction was a deposit and the 2nd transaction was a withdraw. The end product was that both amounts were subtracted from the total. When I did a withdraw first and a deposit second, the amounts were both added together.
I want to implement a kind of "container" in which to store objects (instances) of different types. Then with an iterator I'd call common methods. This is what I have in mind:
Java Code:
with(Positionables){
translate(2, 0, 4);
} mh_sh_highlight_all('java');
Where translate(x, y, z) is a method common for objects in Positionables which objects are of different types (Sphere, Box etc.).
Now I was thinking Positionables could be a List<Positionable> and Positionable is an abstract class and Sphere and Box extends from it. But I don't know how to propagate the call of translate() to the subclasses.
What are the best approaches for this matter? It would be perfect if I could make it so I could somehow use the "with" construction like in the example above.
I have a JPanel with vertical BoxLayout. It contains four components. I set the JPanel to LEFT_ALIGNMENT, which has no effect on its components. I set the first component to LEFT_ALIGNMENT, which has no effect. Only after I have set all four components to LEFT_ALIGNMENT do any of them align properly.
This suggests that it is impossible to have varying alignments in a container. They must all be the same alignment.
I accept that this is just the way things are: "Java works in mysterious ways." And I'm sure that it is possible to work around this limitation by stacking boxes that themselves have different internal alignments.
But I still wonder what in the world was going on in the minds of the Java developers. Is there a rational reason for this oddity?
This raises my most serious criticism of Swing: the hidden gotcha. Swing is a tangled mess of cross-connecting requirements that are impossible to divine by simple inspection of the documentation. If you want to use, say, a JRadioButton, it's not enough to study the documentation on JRadioButtons; you must also consult lots of documents for which there is no obvious connection to JRadioButton other than it being part of Swing.
I am looking for a way to have a Servlet (my container is Tomcat) calling a JSP file and processing it in order to retrieve the generated HTML. The compete scenario:
I have virtual shop and whenever a purchase is being carried out, the customer is redirected to a Servlet that post-processes the purchase (list of the items, etc.)
Among all these, the Servlet is also supposed to send me an email about the new purchase. I would like to have nice designed HTML mail and not just a simple plain text notification. I thought of having a designated JSP as a view, and it will only be available from the Servlet container, for this purpose. One way is having the Servlet create an HTTPClient (or any other method of network communication) to my own host and ask for the JSP.
I wonder if there is a simpler way to ask my own container to process a JSP, since I am not really making a request to an outside web application. Something like getServletContext.processAndReturnJsp("mail.jsp")
BTW, if you think my approach is too cumbersome to fill an email with HTML code, it would be great to know of a simpler way.
the focus traversal policy (hereafter "tab order") in forms and panels doesn't follow the order in which controls were inserted into the container, but is derived from the position of the components on the form or panel. This is very neat (and probably allows sloppy coders and GUI builders to exist without actually ever thinking about the tab order), except when it isn't. As when you actually want to specify a different component order, for example.
In the following example, I've created a form with two columns of buttons. I want the tab order to go through the first column of buttons, followed by second column of buttons (ie. a column-by-column schema). The default tab order is row-by-row, however, and can be obtained for reference by commenting out the setupFocus() call in the constructor.
I had hoped that the ContainerOrderFocusTraversalPolicy would do the job, but there is a couple of problems (which I've addressed in the setupFocus() method). Firstly, the container itself is part of the focus chain. This at least is easily remediable by calling setFocusable(false), but I don't have to do that with the initial focus traversal policy, so I wonder why I have to do it with this one. The other problem is more pressing, though - the ContainerOrderFocusTraversalPolicy lets me (un)hapilly tab through JLabels. Again, I've fixed this, but the initial policy knows all by itself that it's not a good idea to focus a JLabel. Moreover, I'm afraid there might be other components that do not receive focus with the original policy, but ContainerOrderFocusTraversalPolicy might plod though them.
isn't there some focus traversal policy implementation that I could just set and it would tab through exactly the same components as the original policy, except it would order them according to their order in the container?
Code:
package test;
import java.awt.Component;
import java.awt.ContainerOrderFocusTraversalPolicy;
import java.awt.GridBagConstraints;
import java.awt.GridBagLayout;
import java.awt.Insets;
import javax.swing.JButton;
import javax.swing.JDialog;
import javax.swing.JLabel;
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
[code]...
I got stuck with the error "Unknown class" with the code that I copied from the book ...
import javax.swing.*;
class SwingDemo
{
// create a new JFrame container
JFrame MAIN_FRAME = new JFrame ("A Simple Swing Application");
// give the frame an initial size
MAIN_FRAME.setSize(275, 100);
// terminate the program when the user closes the application
MAIN_FRAME.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
[code]...
The error comes from lines 21 and 27.
21 MAIN_FRAME.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
27 MAIN_FRAME.add(FIELD_LABEL);
I have tried to rewrite from scratch and still gets the same error.
So, i got the following code:
@Path("{bill-id}/request")
@Path("{user-id}")
and the following pattern
myhost/c15a856/request
somehow, the container always decides to match it to @Path("{user-id}"). How do I resolve this
I have configured form based JAAS in my app. Basically, in web.xml I have declared security constraints on certain jsp page, declared specific roles, login and error pages. So, my login form is:
<form id="loginForm" action="j_security_check" method="post">
<p>
<label for="name">Username</label> <input name="j_username"
id="username" type="text" required/>
[Code] ....
This works fine when some user tries to access some of the pages declared in <security-constraint> tag of web.xml.
Container automatically manages login process, redirects to login page and if login details are valid, gives access to secured page.
Now, how should I implement login system so that user can go to login page (possibly same login form) and log in from there?
I created a new project at eclipse with this code pasted inside a domApli container in a java file, I tried to run it but it wont work,
package domApli;
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
public class Prg2 extends JFrame implements ActionListener{
JLabel lblNom;
JLabel lblEdad;
JTextField txtNom;
[code]...
I read JEE6 doc and confused with : Does container managed entity manager (injected by PersistenceContext annotation) is thread-safe in stateless session bean in multiple-thread env?
See code below, if there are 2 requests to stateless sesion bean in 2 concurrent threads , is it using same Entity Manager Instance or not?
@Stateless(name = "HRFacade", mappedName = "HR_FACES_EJB_JPA-HRFacade-HRFacade")
public class HRFacadeBean implements HRFacade, HRFacadeLocal {
@Resource
SessionContext sessionContext;
@PersistenceContext(unitName = "HRFacade")
private EntityManager em;
[Code] .....