public static <E extends Comparable<E>> void sort(E[] list... mh_sh_highlight_all('java');
Comparable is an interface and from how i look at this piece of code is that I can only use a class that implements the Comparable interface; however, this is the context my book uses when explaining the following code
First, it specifies that E is a subtype of Comparable.
Second, it specifies that the elements to be compared are of the E type as well.
Set<? super TreeMap> s = new HashSet<SortedMap>();
SortedMap<String,String> sm = new TreeMap<String,String>(); TreeMap<String,String> tm = new TreeMap<String,String>(); s.add(sm); //This fails s.add(tm);
Why does adding sorted map to a Set that allows ? super TreeMap and instantiated as such fail?
I'm working with Doubly Linked Lists and using Java Generics..
My nodes looks like this: class DNode<E> { DNode<E> previous; DNode<E> next; E element;
//and all methods inside }
My list of Nodes looks like this: class DLL<E>{ private DNode<E> head; private DNode<E> tail; private int size;
[code]....
As you can see, as arguments they get "E o"...I need to write a program, which from the main function asks the users how long is the list, and after they type it's length, I ask them to start typing the elements (integers)...and this is how my main method is written, but I can't seem to make it work, specialy when I call the "insLast" method,I guess it's because the arguments i'm giving to the function...how to read the elements and write them into the list?
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { DLL<Integer> lista=new DLL<Integer>(); BufferedReader stdin = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)); String s = stdin.readLine(); int N = Integer.parseInt(s); s = stdin.readLine(); String[] pomniza = s.split(" "); for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) { lista.instLast(Integer.parseInt(pomniza[i])); }
i am interested to add integer objects and String objects into any collection object ..... while iterating the collection object i am not interested to do any type cast in java
I am asked to create a code that if a user enters 1 it will use the object natural comparison form ('default') as written in CompareTo method.But if he chooses to enter something else then another comparison is used.Maybe I just need to use 2 diff comparators? but then what;s the point of defining something as 'default'....
I have the following code that will make linked list and order its elements using self referential objects. but i have the following error: incompatible types
required: ListNode<T#2> found: ListNode<T#1> where T#1,T#2 are type-variables: T#1 extends Comparable declared in method <T#1>insertInOrder(T#1) T#2 extends Comparable declared in class OrderedList
import java.util.*; public class ListNode<T> { ListNode<T> nextNode; T data; public ListNode(T item) { this(item, null);
I have a task to create a Java OOP program, I have a class Team which requires a comparable and iterable interface, the only way I know how to do this is either:
public class Team implements Iterable <Mechanic> or public class Team implements Comparable <Mechanic>
I have studied that Generics are used to shift the Class Cast Exception into Compile time errors , So that we get errors at compile time error and we do correct them before executing ,but Here is a program in which i am getting Class Cast Exception
class Animal { } class Dog extends Animal { } class Cat extends Animal
[code]..
Getting Exception at line no 29 which i know why it occurs but just wanna ask that isn't it should be caught at compile time According to Generics ?
public int[] allIndicesOf(E itemSought) { ArrayList<Integer> toUse = new ArrayList<>(); for (E anArray : container) { if (anArray.equals(itemSought)) { toUse.add(container.indexOf(itemSought));
[Code] ....
I have an array list of strings. I want to be able to return an array of integers telling me which indexes in the string array list contain the itemSought object.
Which of the following classes uses Comparable and Comparator?
QueueTreeSetStackPriorityQueue
In the above question, what does 'uses' mean? Does it mean do above classes implement Comparable and Comparator?
I know that in order to compare any two elements stored in one of the above classes, we need to make the elements' class to implement one of these - either Comparable or Comparator.
/* * Implement the Comparable interface on objects of type Order. * Compare orderId, then productId. The lesser orderId should come first. If the orderIds match, then the lesser productId should come first. */
@Override public int compareTo(Order ord) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if(orderId > ord.orderId){ return 1;
In short, the "Actual" is what my code produces and the "Expected" is what it is supposed to produce. As you can see, only the first one is mismatching... I'll admit, the comment section above the method is confusing and I wasn't exactly sure what it wants me to do, but I thought I figured it out. I just don't see how 5/6 of these tests can work and the 6th one not.
Why java uses the keyword extends when setting the bound of a type parameter(Generic) to an interface. I think using the keyword implements is more intuitive.
public static <T extends Comparable<T>>
why use extends? and not implements.
int countGreaterThan(T[] anArray, T elem) { int count = 0; for (T e : anArray) if (e.compareTo(elem) > 0) ++count; return count; }
I know if I want to set multiple bounds I will use extends keyword, and I will concatenate the bounds using & operator.
Is this a design decision to always use extends keyword to set bounds?
I've an interface with generic methods in it. I would like to have specialized methods in the sub types. While doing that I'm seeing the following warnings in eclipse.
class Sorter { <E> void sort(E[] elements); };
class StringSorter {
// This gives me a warning 'hiding' to 'sort' <String> void sort(String[] elements) { }
// Gives me an error "The method someCrap(String[]) in the type StringSorter is not applicable for the arguments (String[])" void someCrap(String[] elements) { } };
I would like to understand why eclipse gives the above warnings and errors.
Below is the requirements and code. I am getting the error CODELAB ANALYSIS: LOGICAL ERROR(S)We think you might want to consider using: >
Hints:
-Correct solutions that use equals almost certainly also uses high -Correct solutions that use equals almost certainly also uses low
Assume the existence of a Widget class that implements the Comparable interface and thus has a compareTo method that accepts an Object parameter and returns an int . Write an efficient static method , getWidgetMatch, that has two parameters . The first parameter is a reference to a Widget object . The second parameter is a potentially very large array of Widget objects that has been sorted in ascending order based on the Widget compareTo method . The getWidgetMatch searches for an element in the array that matches the first parameter on the basis of the equals method and returns true if found and false otherwise.
public static boolean getWidgetMatch(Widget a, Widget[] b){ int bot=0; int top=b.length-1; int x = 0; int y=0; while (bot >= top)
I am trying to make a generic method that will replace the data type T with those number types usable with a Scanner object. However, whenever I try to compile, I get errors saying that a Byte/Integer/Double etc are found when only a type T is allowed. This is the beginning of my method. I can;t understand what is wrong with it.
Java Code:
public <T extends Number> T nextRanged(T lowerBound, T upperBound, boolean inclusive, String errorMessage){ // Holds program execution until user inputs a numeric value between the bounds. Prevents all other input without exception. // Output data type determined by the type of the bounds. T input = null; try{ if(input instanceof Byte){ input = new Byte(internalScanner.nextByte());
[Code] ....
The purpose of the method, in the end, will be to provide the nextXXX() functionality of a Scanner object but with built in validation procedures. I could easily do this by making a nextIntRanged(), nextDoubleRanged() etc methods, but this seems wasteful to me.
I meant "incompatible type errors"!
Error example:
ValidatedScanner.java:57: error: incompatible types input = new Byte(internalScanner.nextByte()); ^ required: T found: Byte
where T is a type-variable:
T extends Number declared in method <T>nextRanged(T,T,boolean,String)
I am working on an assignment that requires me to implement 2 methods (add() and remove()) and create an inner class (OrderedListNode). I must use data items of type Comparable. The items should be sorted.
I understand what needs to be done, but I am having a difficult time actually writing the code. I added the main method to check to see if my code works, and it doesn't seem like that is even being read.It compiles without error - it only gives a warning of unchecked or unsafe operations.
Code:
package dataStructures; //This class functions as a linked list, but ensures items are stored in ascending order. public class OrderedLinkedList { //return value for unsuccessful searches private static final OrderedListNode NOT_FOUND = null;
Operator is undefined for argument type. Error is located at the end of the binary search method array[position] < key
import java.util.Arrays; public class binarySearch { public static <T extends Comparable<T>> int binarysearch(T key, T[] array) { int start = 0; int end = array.length - 1; int position =-1; while (start <= end && position == -1) {
