This means that x is a reference to objects of type, "myType" and no memory has been set aside for an instance of this object. I think it's true that x also has the starting memory address of this object.
What I feel uncertain about is if x is telling the JVM(?) where it can find the starting address of this object, why do we care about the type that x is?
i.e., if we assign x to an object totally unrelated to this type then the compiler would complain - correct? If so, how come, since all x is doing is telling the JVM(?) where to find your object (via the address it contains).
I suppose all, hy a reference has a type associated with it if all the reference does is point you to the object?
I don't really know what this means and it is sending an error when I try to run my program I am trying to set the x and y value (Int x and int y) to setVisible false at a specific time in my game but it keeps sending the error that int is not a reference type.
I have a Homework that's on Polymorphism and inheritance. The problem is of a triangle class. The super class is GeometricObject and the subclass Triangle. I have the parent and child classes compiling, now it's the test program.
The problem is the examples in the book don't show anything about prompting input for objects. The objects in the Triangle class are: side1, side2, and side3 and so I created objects in the test: Triangle sideOne = new Triangle(); . I've tried to compile but jGrasp doesn't like anything I do and the instructor in my class hasn't shown us examples yet. Can I prompt input for reference type and not just primitive type?
Primitive arguments, such as an int or a double, are passed into methods by value. This means that any changes to the values of the parameters exist only within the scope of the method. When the method returns, the parameters are gone and any changes to them are lost.
Reference data type parameters, such as objects, are also passed into methods by value. This means that when the method returns, the passed-in reference still references the same object as before. However, the values of the object's fields can be changed in the method, if they have the proper access level.For example, consider a method in an arbitrary class that moves Circle objects:
public void moveCircle(Circle circle, int deltaX, int deltaY) { // code to move origin of // circle to x+deltaX, y+deltaY circle.setX(circle.getX() + deltaX); circle.setY(circle.getY() + deltaY);
// code to assign a new // reference to circle circle = new Circle(0, 0); }
Let the method be invoked with these arguments: moveCircle(myCircle, 23, 56)
Inside the method, circle initially refers to myCircle. The method changes the x and y coordinates of the object that circle references (i.e., myCircle) by 23 and 56, respectively. These changes will persist when the method returns. Then circle is assigned a reference to a new Circle object with x = y = 0. This reassignment has no permanence, however, because the reference was passed in by value and cannot change. Within the method, the object pointed to by circle has changed, but, when the method returns, myCircle still references the same Circle object as before the method was called.
public class CollisionManager<T> { private boolean collision = false; private T mainEntity; public <T extends Entities> void handleCollision(T mainEntity, T secondEntity){ this.mainEntity = mainEntity; // This is illegal. } }
Why "this.mainEntity = mainEntity" is incorrect and also show me the correct way to achieve this?
The error I am getting is "Type mismatch: cannot convert T to T"
I am trying to implement the following example to override the equality and hashCode method if the class has reference type member. I do get the expected result "true" for equal and "false" for non-equal objects. But the print statement in the Circle's equal method is not executed when the objects values are not equal. I don't know what i am missing, though i get the equality result "false" as expected for non equal objects.
class Point{ private int x, y; Point (int x, int y) { this.x =x; this.y = y;
I use this code in Restlet Representation. I try to get the value from the Request API. But I am facing the problem as "Cannot make a static reference to the non-static method getQuery() from the type Resource".
Now lets say that I want to access a method 'addInterest()' that is in the 'SavingsAccount' class I would have to do: '((SavingsAccount)s).addInterest();'
The question I have is why do I have to cast 'b' to SavingsAccount? Isn't the actual object reference of 'b' already an instance of 'SavingsAccount' class? How does the 'BankAccount' affect the object itself? I'm really confused as to what class is truly getting instantiated and how BankAccount and SavingsAccount are both functioning to make the object 'b'.
I don't understand why the object reference variable 'a' cannot be recast from a thisA object reference to a thisB object reference.Is it the case that once a reference variable is linked to a particular object type then it cannot switch object types later on.I am facing the Java Associate Developer exam soon and I am just clearing up some issues in my head around object reference variable assignment,
class thisA {} class thisB extends thisA { String testString = "test";} public class CastQuestion2 { public static void main(String[] args) { thisA a = new thisA(); thisB b = new thisB();
I am writing the following program in Java SE 7. It throwing "Cannot make a static reference to the non-static type String" . However if I write parameterised String inside main method as java.lang.String[] args, it compiles fine.
class MainClass<String> { <T> MainClass(T t) { System.out.println(t.getClass().getName()); } public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("asdasd"); new MainClass<>(""); } }
I mean following programs compile fine in Java SE 7 :
class MainClass<String> { <T> MainClass(T t) { System.out.println(t.getClass().getName()); } public static void main(java.lang.String[] args) { System.out.println("asdasd"); new MainClass<>(""); } }
What is exactly reason for existence of inner classes? Are there problems that without them you can not (or be very hard to) resolve? Anything beside emulate multiple inheritance, when you need to extends the real classes ( not implements multiple interfaces) ?
If you have final int i = 1; short s = 1; switch(s) { case i: System.out.println(i); }
it runs fine. Note that the switch expression is of type short (2 bytes) and the case constant is of type int (4 bytes).My question is: Is the type irrelevant as long as the value is within the boundaries of the type of the switch expression?I have the feeling that this is true since:
byte b = 127; final int i = 127; switch(b) { case i: System.out.println(i); }
This runs fine again, but if I change the literal assigned to i to 128, which is out of range for type byte, then the compiler complains.Is it true that in the first example the short variable and in the second example the byte variable (the switch expressions) are first implicitly converted to an int and then compared with the case constants?
Got a problem with generics, which I'm still pretty new at. Here's a program that compiles fine:
import java.util.ArrayList; import javax.swing.JComponent; public class Experiments { public static void main(String[] args) { ListHolder holder = new ListHolder();
[Code] ....
It's useless, but it compiles. If I change Line 14, however, to add a generic type parameter to the ListHolder class, Line 10 no longer compiles:
import java.util.ArrayList; import javax.swing.JComponent; public class Experiments { public static void main(String[] args) { ListHolder holder = new ListHolder();
[Code] ....
I get this error:
Uncompilable source code - incompatible types: java.lang.Object cannot be converted to javax.swing.JComponent at experiments.Experiments.main(Experiments.java:10)
Apparently, the introduction of the type parameter leaves the compiler thinking that aList is of type Object. I can cast it, like this:
JComponent c = ((ArrayList<JComponent>)holder.aList).iterator().next();
That makes the compiler happy, but why is it necessary? How does adding the (unused) type parameter to the ListHolder class end up making the compiler think the aList member of an instance of ListHolder is of type Object?
I'm trying to parse and compare the content of a zip file. However I'm stuck at what SHOULD be a very simple problem, however I can't seem to find a solution. I have done the following:
ZipInputStream zin1 = new ZipInputStream(fin); ZipEntry ze1 = null; fin2 = new FileInputStream(fileName2); ZipInputStream zin2 = new ZipInputStream(fin2); ZipEntry ze2 = null; //fin.close(); ze1 = zin1.getNextEntry(); ze2 = zin2.getNextEntry();
Which gives me the first entry of each zipfile as a ZipEntry type object. I have tried getting the path of the file (inside the zip file) and using this to create a File type object. This does not seem to work though I get:
Exception in thread "main" java.io.FileNotFoundException: My DocumentsmetadatacoreProperties.xml (The system cannot find the file specified) at java.io.FileInputStream.open(Native Method) at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(Unknown Source) at java.io.FileReader.<init>(Unknown Source)
And this is because I get a null return from trying to create the File file1 = new File(correctLocation);
I guess I cannot access the file inside a zip file this way. So my question is how can I make a ZipEntry type object into a File type object?
The objective of the code is to add new records based on existing records with a partial change to the key. I'm getting "type of the expression must be an array type but it resolved to DstidArray" on dsTidRecTbl[i]
String stMajor = request.getParameter("stMajorVersion"); String stMinor = request.getParameter("stMinorVersion"); String stPatch = request.getParameter("stPatchVersion"); StringBuffer stKeySB = new StringBuffer(stMajor+stMinor+stPatch); String stKey = new String(stKeySB.toString()); DstidArray dsTidRecTbl = new DstidArray(stKey); request.setAttribute("dsTidRecTbl", dsTidRecTbl);
I am doing a Junit test case, but I keep having issues with AssertEquals ( object expected, object actual). I don't know how to reference the other actual object so that it can compare to the expected.
public void add (Distance d) throws CustomException { //I can also convert feet to inches and add all inches together and then divided inches to feet and inches Distance result = new Distance(); int newFeet = this.feet + d.getFeet(); int newInches = this.inches + d.getInches(); if(newInches > 11) { newFeet = newFeet + (newInches/12);
I'm fairly new to Java, I'm very experienced with C++ and C# in which you can pass by reference - extremely useful. Take for example this bit of code in C#:
class MyClass { public MyClass(int i) { m_i = i; } public int m_i;
[Code] ...
Just at the end of this program x.m_i will be equal to 8. As far as I can see this is not possible in Java: you can't pass a double by reference, using a Double will kick in the autoboxing so that won't work either. The only "solution" in Java would be to pass in a double[] (of length 1) or to make a wrapper class, both nasty solutions because a user may want to just hold a double as a member of their class just as I have, for reasons such as not allocating more memory for a class and generally not being bloated.
I am making an MVC program and I am not allowed to put the action listeners in the view class. I was able to get one button working fine but since I am unable to reference them I cannot give them both individual responses.
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent; import java.awt.event.ActionListener; public class Controller { HobbyList model; ListView view;
public class { public static void main(String[] args) { Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in); double[] numbers = new double[10]; System.out.println("Enter " + numbers.length + "numbers"); for (int i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) { numbers[i] = input.nextDouble();
[Code] .....
I am trying to reference the input "numbers[i]" to my mean method, how do i do that?
I know in C++ It's possible to pass by reference but what about java?
For example, can i pass the address of a health variable into a Ninja class and then
Since Ninja inherits from an enemy class pass the health into the enemy class and within there have a function that returns that same health address and takes 5 from the health returning 95.
I passed my abstract class private final reference to another concrete class and I used abstract class reference as parameter to that concrete class constructor and in my main method and null to that parameter then only that program executes correctly...i placing my code below ..if there is any error tell me where is error occurring then i will check my code...i think my code is right but little bit doubt abstract class concept.
{ } class concept1 extends concept { private final concept parent; public concept1(concept aparent) { parent=aparent; System.out.println(parent); } public static void main(String args[]) { //concept p=new concept1(null); concept c=new concept1(null); }}
