Writing Constructor In Abstract Class
Feb 4, 2015Below Code
abstract class A
{
A(int a, int b)
{
}
}
If we can't create objects for abstract class, what is the need of writing constructor???
Below Code
abstract class A
{
A(int a, int b)
{
}
}
If we can't create objects for abstract class, what is the need of writing constructor???
Do we have constructor in abstract class? If we have then what is the use of it?
View Replies View RelatedWhat are the benefits of using an Interface plus an abstract class, over just an abstract class?
View Replies View RelatedI am just started to learn java and i am facing trouble learning abstract class.
View Replies View RelatedI know whats the interfaces and abstract class and also know that difference between interface and abstract class,but here my doubt is eventhough abstract class more advantage than the interface,then why should we use interfaces and when?
View Replies View RelatedI passed my abstract class private final reference to another concrete class and I used abstract class reference as parameter to that concrete class constructor and in my main method and null to that parameter then only that program executes correctly...i placing my code below ..if there is any error tell me where is error occurring then i will check my code...i think my code is right but little bit doubt abstract class concept.
{
}
class concept1 extends concept
{
private final concept parent;
public concept1(concept aparent)
{
parent=aparent;
System.out.println(parent);
}
public static void main(String args[])
{
//concept p=new concept1(null);
concept c=new concept1(null);
}}
Difference between Abstract class and Interface??
View Replies View RelatedWhy we can't create object of abstract class ,when we can create its constructor?
View Replies View RelatedI am under the assumption that In the return statement of getReciprocal() method(of the following code), a temporary Number object is created to hold the result of the calculation.
My question is, Number is an abstract class and we are only able to create reference of an abstract class not an object. But then how a temp Number object is created and returned?
class Gen<T extends Number>{
T ob;
Gen(T ob){
this.ob = ob;
}
Number getReciprocal(){ // Number is abstract class
[Code] .....
in abstract class constructors are not recommended since we don't call it directly ...my doubt is below code is right or wrong...
3public abstract class Concept
4{
5 private String id;
6
7 protected Concept( String anId )
8 {
9 if ( anId == null )
10 {
11 throw new NullPointerException( "id must not be null" );
12 }
13
14 id = anId;
15 }
I'm learning about abstract classes and I have to create an abstract auto class with make and price of a car, then two classes with a different type of car, and finally a main to use them. Everything seems to work and when I run it it's fine but I do get an error on the main that I'm not using the local variable buick1 and acura1.I'm curious because, while it runs for me, I want to make sure I'm doing it right and don't know of another way to do the output than this. I've put all four classes but the issue is on the last one (5 and 7).
public abstract class Auto
{
protected String makeCar;
protected double priceCar;
public Auto(String newMake)
{
makeCar = newMake;
[code]....
Animal ob1=new Lion();
Here we create ob1 for Animal class or Lion class.
public abstract class Animal {
public abstract void eat();
public void breathe(){
[Code] ....
What this interface inside that abstract class does. Looking for some examples to how can i use it ....
public abstract class Expression {
public abstract String toString();
public abstract SimpleExpression evaluate();
public void show() {
System.out.println(this + " = " + evaluate());
[Code] ....
I've got an abstract class
public abstract class AbstractClass
{
//stuff
}
And a few classes that inherit from it
public class Class1 extends AbstractClass
{
//stuff
}
public class Class2 extends AbstractClass
{
//stuff
}
within another class I have a private variable with the type of the Abstract class, and within one of the methods I assign an object to the the variable like this:
public class Test
{
private AbstractClass temp;
public testMethod(){
Class1 anObject = new Class1();
temp = anObject;
}
}
Is this legal? Will temp become a Class1 object?
can we pass private final class object to another class constructor?
View Replies View RelatedSo i declared a class in main class but it seems there's error when i compile:
constructor xx in class xx cannot applied to given types
This is my java class:
public class trainer extends person{
String classType;
public trainer(String name, String gender, String address, int id, String classType) {
super(name,gender,address,id);
this.classType=classType;
[Code] ....
And this is the way i declared in main class:
trainer tr = new trainer();
And what i want to do is:
tr.toString();
How do I create an instance of a class in a method?
I am a bit rusty whenever I think of instances. I always think of main method and objects when I see instance which gets me confused on what to do when I am not in a main method. The example:
I have a abstract class, School, and inside School I have some methods that must preform some action on an instance. For example, there is a move() method that must move the instance of School. Another method named, personOld(), which returns whether or not an instance of School surpassed some determined age.
How do I do this and create this instance?
I have a simple classes here one is interface and another one is abstract class when i try to compile them abstract class is givving compilation error.
public interface MyInterface{
public void getName();
public void getName(String s);
}
public class HelloWorld{}
abstract class SampleClass{
[code]....
While reading the design patter book, i got one doubt ,There is a List an interface having sub classes ArrayList, LinkedList etc.,
Q1) My question is Why they declared the List as interface rather than Abstract class?
Q2) i read some site -
List l = new ArrayList(); Why it is GOOD line?
ArrayList l = new ArrayList() ; Why it is BAD line?
Answer required with detailed information for Q1 and Q2.
I've a parent class with a argument constructor like below(a sample code)
public class Parent {
Parent(String name) {
System.out.println(name);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
}
}
Also I've child.class which extends Parent.class as shown below,
public class child extends Parent {
child(String name) {
super(name);
}
}
Now, I want create/modify the constructor which is in child, by taking "int i" as an input instead of "String name". How can I do that? Run time I want to execute child constructor not a parent constructor.
Condition is: Without making any changes to the Parent class
This code is directly from Swing: I'm using Eclipse and keep getting an error on line 10 saying :
"The type JTextField must implement the inherited abstract method ActionListener.actionPerformed(ActionEvent)."
import java.awt.FlowLayout;
import java.awt.event.ActionEvent;
import java.awt.event.ActionListener;
import javax.swing.JFrame;
import javax.swing.JLabel;
import javax.swing.JTextField;
import javax.swing.SwingUtilities;
[Code] ......
I had to write a class called Thermometer, that has one instance variable (an integer) for the temperature in Fahrenheit. I had to include the following methods
-a constructor that initializes the temperature to 60
-there is a method to change the temperature
-there is a method to display the temperature
-there is a method to reset the teperature to 60
Here is the code for that.
public class Thermometer {
private int temp;
private int thermometer;
public Thermometer() {
thermometer = 60;
[code]....
Now I get to the issue. I have to write a test class called thermometer to test the thermometer class. I need to test each method while displaying the temperature after it. My professor said I should use the invoke method but didn't go into much more detail than that.
User-defined classes. The concept of getters and setters goes right over my head. Right now we're to write a program to test the Person class below. We have to create 2 instances of the class to test each constructor, and test each method.
class Person {
// Data Members
private String name; // The name of this person
private int age; // The age of this person
private char gender; // The gender of this person
// Default constructor
public Person() {
this("Not Given", 0, 'U');
[code]....
then my output will print out the name. But the assignment doesn't tell us to modify the Person class at all, just to create a tester one.
I need to create a new text file and instantiate objects using an array that writes them to a file and working with the array part.
public class NewTextFile
{
private Formatter file;
public void openFile()
{
try
[code]....
This code works
public class RedShapeDecorator extends ShapeDecorator {
public RedShapeDecorator(Shape decoratedShape) {
super(decoratedShape);
}
Below results in an error
public class RedShapeDecorator extends ShapeDecorator {
protected Shape decoratedShape;
public RedShapeDecorator(Shape decoratedShape) {
this. decoratedShape=decoratedShape;
}
So I am guessing that if you extend class, you should use super to pass objects?
I am writing a program that should take a url and scan the page for any links. It is in the beginning stages, but I ran into an error when I tried to extend a class. There's a lot going on in this code, but the error is caused by the constructor.
Error message at compile time:
"constructor Page in class Page cannot be applied to given types;
{//Constructor
^
required: String
found: no arguments
reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length".
Here's the code(first my class, then the class I extended)
public class SearchEngine extends Page {
public static Color customGreen = new Color(69, 194, 33);
public static Color customYellow = new Color(232, 166, 12);
public static Color customBlue = new Color(25,97,255);
public static Color customYellowComp = new Color(178,125,0);
[code]...