Help With A UNION Select Please
Sep 15, 2005
I have a query that requires a selection from my list box "[Forms]![ViewReports]![ListFilterName]"
I have a list box with a UNION so that I can query all contacts. The bound column is one.
SELECT 0,"<<ALL","TEAM MEMBERS>>" from Contacts UNION (SELECT Contacts.ID, Contacts.[First Name], Contacts.[Last Name] FROM Contacts ORDER BY [Last Name]);
Problems
The list is not ordering by last name.
The query does not assume all contacts when "<<ALL","TEAM MEMBERS>>" is selected.
Where did I go wrong? What's missing?
View Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 28, 2006
Please see attached database
If you open the form called people you will see a command button
Called add charge once pressed will open a form called charge
On the Bill To combo Box I have the following Union Select Query
SELECT PrimaryInsurance, PersonID FROM tblpeople UNION Select SecondaryInsurance, PersonID FROM tblPeople
What I want the bill to combo box to display is only the Insurances that are related to the
Patient that the charge is for and not to display other patients insurances
Any Ideas
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2007
I am having difficulty getting a query to work, there's probably something really simple I'm missing. . . I can get the Union function to work but I can't get it to create a table for me. The basic query looks like this:
INSERT INTO test
SELECT * FROM [Design] WHERE (Design.CID Not Like "*-*")
UNION
SELECT * FROM [Release] WHERE (Release.CID Not Like "*-*")
It works fine and shows me the table I want without the first line, but I would like it to input into a new or existing table. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2005
I have a UNION of two SELECT queries. It works very well but I need the end-user to be able to modify the data so I am using INSERT INTO tablename. This will work for one query at a time but if I try to use the UNION it reports “Syntax error in FROM clause”. Can you use UNION in this case or can anyone see my error?
The full statement is rather complex, I have added a few spaces and linebreaks to make it readable as follows:
INSERT INTO TableCompleteForMailing
SELECT [Address List].[FamilySurname] AS Surname,
[Address List].[DEARFirstnames] AS FirstName,
[Address List].[Mailing] AS Mailing,
[Address List].[Christmas Mailing] AS OtherMailing, [Address List].[Address 1] AS Address1,
[Address List].[Postcode] AS Postcode
FROM [Address List]
UNION
SELECT [Names].[LastName] AS Surname,
[Names].[FirstName] AS FirstName,
[Names].[MailingList] AS Mailing,
[Names].[Selected] AS OtherMailing,
[Address List].[Address 1] AS Address1,
[Address List].[Postcode] AS Postcode
FROM [Names],[Address List]
WHERE [Names].[AddressListID]=[Address List].[AddressListID]
ORDER BY Surname, FirstName;
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2006
I have Access2003 and a problem creating a simple method of constructing a union query.
I am using a commercial paradox databse that has a habit of creating a new table every time a certain action is performed. There is currently a set of 160 tables with identical fields. The database allows me to view data in these tables individually. I would like to pull the information together, from between 20 and 30 specific tables at any one time, and view the data in one table.
I have linked the tables in a an access database and would go about viewing the data by creating a union query containing each of the tables of interest. Then appending the info in these tables to a new table.
Unfortunately manually adjusting the SQL expression is a bit cumbersome to say the least I am wondering if it possible to select the tables of interest from a List Box on a simple form and have those selected inserted into the union query ?
Alternatively, the table names are actually a field within a different table. Another field within this table actually determines whether they will be of interest. So ideally I could query that table to tell me which tables need to appear in the union query. Again I would like the union query generated automatically as a result of that query.
I am confident, perhaps without good reason , that this must be possible ....
any help much appreciated.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2013
I am trying to get a report that shows both column totals and row totals.
I have a crosstab query that gives me the Row totals along with the crosstab data.
I have read on a previous post [URL] ....
That I can union the crosstab to a select query which should get me what I want, but to be honest I am lost.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2006
(This is a modified repost - which hopefully makes sense) I am using Access2003. I am trying to set up a fast method of creating a union query. I have a jobs table that stores info about jobs with a separate table for each job that pulls together info from elsewhere when a review is conducted. The tables are as follows (and are linked from a paradox DB) :-
Table Name: jobs
JobID (J000001, J000002, etc)
Status (Live, Filled, etc)
Review Tables
Table Name: J000001 / J000002 etc
Consultant: (Joe, Terry etc)
ObjectID: (RoberI, SmithJ etc)
Status: (H, P, D, R etc)
The jobs table contains information about jobs, including a unique code (JobID) that identifies the job. There is also a status filed that tells us whether the job is Live or closed etc.
The first time a job is reviewed a new table, a review table is generated, and the name of the table is the same as the JobID for that job. So Job J000001 has a review table with table name J000001 etc. The review tables may contain information with the same ObjectID (as they are unique fields from a third table – the candidates table)
I would like to generate a union query for all jobs in table jobs with a status of live. I can do this manually, if I review a list of live jobs, with the following sql expression;
SELECT ObjectID, Consultant, Status, "J000001"
as [JobNo] FROM J000001
UNION SELECT ObjectID, Consultant, Status, "J000002"
as [JobNo] FROM J000002
UNION SELECT ObjectID, Consultant, Status, "J000003"
as [JobNo] FROM J000003;
I can then append the info into a new table. However this query is run at least twice a day and things change.
I would like to know is there a means of automatically generating sql for the union query based on results of a query of the jobs table ?
Any help greatly appreciated.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2007
I have the following query:
SELECT UnionTable.groupby, UnionTable.SeqID, UnionTable.Actual
FROM (
SELECT VAP1.groupby, VAP1.SeqID, VAP1.SomVanbedrag as Actual
FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillar_Forecast AS VAP1
UNION
SELECT VAP2.groupby, VAP2.SeqID, VAP2.SomVanbedrag as Actual
FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillarIST_Forecast AS VAP2) AS UnionTablewhich is two select queries called UnionTable and a wrapper.
Access handles this very well. Until you look at the SQL statement. If you don't pay attention Access stores the next query
SELECT UnionTable.groupby, UnionTable.SeqID, UnionTable.Actual
FROM [
SELECT VAP1.groupby, VAP1.SeqID, VAP1.SomVanbedrag as Actual
FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillar_Forecast AS VAP1
UNION
SELECT VAP2.groupby, VAP2.SeqID, VAP2.SomVanbedrag as Actual
FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillarIST_Forecast AS VAP2]. AS UnionTable
Now when you want to execute the query you get an errormessage.
Has anyone seen this before? Is this a known bug or is it a feature? Is there a workaround?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2013
I'm having a problem with a UNION / UNION ALL query.It seems there is a application crash fault when running the query that MS are aware of and have issued a hot fix. Unfortunately it will take my IT dept some time to check and install the hot fix If they agree to do it at all.
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: MSACCESS.EXE
Application Version: 12.0.6606.1000
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2015
I have a multi slect list box (simple) and I need to find and select an item using vba - e.g., the bound column is the ID field and I need to select a specific ID (which will be different each time) as opposed to selecting the 100th record for example. How do I do this?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2014
I have a subform containing a list of Funds and attributes such as Asset Type, Fund Manager, etc.
Currently, I have a textbox, where the the control source is set so that it will be updated with the Asset Type from the subform.
I also have an unbound combo box that contains a list of Asset Types queried from a table via row source, where user can select the Asset Type.
What I would like is when a record is selected from the subform, the Asset Type is selected on the combo box as a default value. User can select another Asset Type if required. How can I do this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2004
Hi,
is there any (reasonably simple) way to select or deselect multiple items from the List Box with individual clicks without using Ctrl key. Eg first click on an item would select it leaving all other items as they are, subsequent click on the already selected item would deselect it etc. I hope this is not too confusing and I would appreciate some help.
Thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 19, 2005
i have a multiselect listbox in my form.
The multiselectlistbox contains the names of different persons from tblUsers.
it's allready possible to write the id's of the names to another table (tblPresent).
But what I can't manage to do is re-select the values in another multiselect listbox. This multiselectlistbox is located on my editform.
I can display the values using a valuelistbox, but i need to see the non-selected items too..
hope someone can help me out
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2014
When I run the below code I am getting the error "End Select without Select Case" I figured it might be because I have the "End Select" before the "End With" however when I move the "End Select" after the "End With" I get the error "Loop Without Do".
Code:
Private Sub cmd_Update_Conditional_Codes_Click()
Dim rs As DAO.Recordset
Dim rs2 As DAO.Recordset
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2008
Hi,
Can anyone please tell me what I am doing wrong here?
SELECT *
from Qry_300_Sel_In Jan not Dec
UNION ALL
SELECT *
from Qry_301_Sel_In Apr not Dec
UNION ALL
SELECT *
from Qry_302_Sel_In Jul not Dec
UNION ALL SELECT *
Qry_303_Sel_In Oct not Dec;
It is telling me that my syntax is wron in the From clause - But I don't get it!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2006
Hello again.
If anyone can help me it would be greatly appreciated.
I’m not sure shy I’m having so much trouble with this, but I’m sure that this will be a great learning opportunity for me.
I’ll explain it two different ways, and that way hopefully it will make sense
First off I’m trying to take all the Companies I work with and get there Net Sales
Example:
Company 1 $1,625.25
Company 2 $6,782.12
ect
I have two queries
The first one is:
qrtySym_Global_ALL_and_SUBFILE_A3
The second one is:
FROM qrtySym_Global_ALL_and_SUBFILE_A4
Below is the Union Query I currently have, and it puts together both queries and shows the totals separately
I would like it to show the Company Name and next to that the Net Sales for that company
SELECT "Total" , Sum(NETSALES)
FROM qrtySym_Global_ALL_and_SUBFILE_A3
union All
SELECT "Total" , Sum(NETSALES)
FROM qrtySym_Global_ALL_and_SUBFILE_A4
Let me see if I can explain it better
The are three columns in the two queries that are the same.
Company Business/ Company Name/Net Sales
I’m trying to take all the
A: Company Business that has the same name from query 1 and query 2 and merge them.
B: Company Name that has the same name from query 1 and query 2 and merge them.
C: Then with the merging of Company Business and the Company Name, Sum the total for the Net Sales.
I really appreciate you helping, so let me know if this doesn’t make sense
Thanks
Corey
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2005
I have created a report that provides me with employee expenses for temps per week. The types of expenses have been defined as Ad_hoc amounts.
An SQL union query I have used to combine fields
Adhoc_Code_1 - 3
Adhoc_description_1 - 3
Adhoc_Pay_Amount_1 - 3
(details of full sql query below)
I have tried to run for a particular week which should have 3 expense entries but only 2 have been picked up.
I think this is because both Adhoc_ Pay_Amount_2 and 3 have a value of 6 and the UNION operation will not return duplicate records. I have amended to UNION ALL but all entries are duplicated. Can anyone help?
Thanks
SELECT dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Employer_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Department, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Tax_Yr_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Period_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Session_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Code_1, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Description_1, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_1, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Timesheet_Number
FROM dbo_Valid_Timesheets
WHERE (((dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_1)<>0));
UNION ALL
SELECT dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Employer_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Department, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Tax_Yr_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Period_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Session_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Code_2, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Description_2, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_2, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Timesheet_Number
FROM dbo_Valid_Timesheets
WHERE (((dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_2)<>0));
UNION ALL
SELECT dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Employer_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Department, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Tax_Yr_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Period_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Session_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Code_3, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Description_3, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_3, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Timesheet_Number
FROM dbo_Valid_Timesheets
WHERE (((dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_3)<>0));
UNION ALL SELECT dbo_EE_Payment_History.Employer_Ref, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Department, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Year, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Period, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Session, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Payment_Ref, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Type, Val([Payment_Value]) AS [Value], "" AS Timesheet
FROM dbo_EE_Payment_History INNER JOIN dbo_Payslip_Static_Data ON (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Session = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Session_Number) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Period = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Period_Number) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Year = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Tax_Year) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Personnel_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Personnel_Ref) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Employer_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Employer_Ref)
WHERE (((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Year)=[Forms]![Misc]![year]) AND ((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Period)=[Forms]![Misc]![period]) AND ((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Session)=[Forms]![Misc]![session]) AND ((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Payment_Ref)=777));
UNION ALL SELECT dbo_EE_Payments.Employer_Ref, dbo_EE_Payments.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Department, [Forms]![Misc]![year] AS Tax_Year, [Forms]![Misc]![period] AS Tax_Period, [Forms]![Misc]![session] AS Tax_Session, dbo_EE_Payments.Payment_Ref, dbo_EE_Payments.X_Type, Val([Calculated_Value]) AS [Value], "" AS Timesheet
FROM dbo_EE_Payments INNER JOIN dbo_Payslip_Static_Data ON (dbo_EE_Payments.Personnel_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Personnel_Ref) AND (dbo_EE_Payments.Employer_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Employer_Ref)
WHERE (((dbo_EE_Payments.Payment_Ref)=777));
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2005
OK, so I am UNIONing two tables using UNION ALL. It works fine. The resultant table has 192 records (63 + 129).
If a use just UNION or UNION DISTINCT I get 184 records. I'm pretty sure that is telling me that 8 records (192 - 184) exist in both tables.
How do I query to find out what those 8 records are?? I'm trying to use an INTERSECT in MS Access, but it doesn't want to work. Here is my original query:
select * from qryMOE_Active_All
UNION ALL select * from qryMOE_Closed_All;
Thanks,
Brian
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2005
I am a basic access user so please forgive my ignorance. I have created a union query of three tables. There is one field from the third table that I would like to have in the final table but this field does not exist in the first table. If I put "none" in the first SELECT line, then it queries correctly but the field name on the table is "Expr1006". If I put "Field 2" or [Field 2] in that same space of the first SELECT line, then it asks me for a parameter value and whatever I enter it fills in all the cells of that field with that value. I just don't know that language very well or even if you can add a new field into the first SELECT table. Thank you for any thoughts
Ex: SELECT [Field 1], [Field 2], "none", [Field 3]
FROm [Table 1]
UNION
SELECT [Field 1], "none", [Field 2], [Field 3]
FROM [Table 2]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2005
I have a UNION qry in which I have Out, Incoming and internal invoices as RELATIONSHIPs, and based on it a CROSSTAB qry, and now there are 2 new categories which are goods that were returned - and there are 2 because:
1. is return from Internal and
2. is return from Outgoing invoices.
I need to calculate the current InStock (based on articalNumbers) with this in mind:
InStock = Incoming - OUTgoing - Internal + returnfromInternal + returnFromOutgoing
However, I cant seem to get a returns to the same crosstab qry in order to include them in calculation
the real names of variables are not important but the principle on which I should base my qry is the problem for me (please have in mind that I first started working in access about 2 months ago)
Is there anything wrong with the principle of my work here?
t i a...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2006
How do I use the union all command to combine 3 queries together and create a new field. I am trying to create a search that will combine the names in 3 fields and let me select any of them and pull up the records that are associated with that person.
I have written a database for an apartment complex. I am trying to simpify the search capabilities. They have 3 types of tenants, listed as HT-Head Tenant, CT-Co-Tenant & CT2- Co-Tenant 2. These fields are in a data base with all the info that applies to each apartment. I would like to be able to search from one combo box any of these tenants and have the correct information come up. Some one told me to use 3 queries and the SQL Union all command to get the fields combined into one field. But I can't get that to work. I am kind of a rookie as I have taught myself to do this so I might not be doing something correct. I was also told by doing the above steps I could use the ID field at the bound field. But not sure How to accomplish that either.
Appreciate any help I can get.
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2006
Hello All,
I need help with an Union All Query. It is ignoring the second select statement. Can anyone see what I am doing wrong?
SELECT
CEPM_PLGR.COST_ELEM_CTGY AS [COST_ELEM_CTGY]
, CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID AS [PROJ_ELEM_ID]
, CEPM_PLGR.COST_ELEM AS [COST_ELEM]
, CEPM_PLGR.SUM_UNIT AS [SUM_UNIT]
, CEPM_PLGR.PRD AS [PRD]
, CEPM_PLGR.CUR_BUD AS [CUR_BUD]
, CEPM_PLGR.PRD_BUD AS [PRD_BUD]
, CEPM_PLGR.CURRENT_ACT AS [CURRENT_ACT]
, CEPM_PLGR.PERIOD_ACT AS [PERIOD_ACT]
, CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_DESC AS [PROJ_ELEM_DESC]
, CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_MGR AS [PROJ_ELEM_MGR]
, CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_TYPE AS [PROJ_ELEM_TYPE]
, NULL AS [COMMIT GA]
, CSIOWNER_PELM.COST_STAT AS [COST_STAT]
, CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_NBR AS [PROJ_NBR]
,NULL AS [COMMIT $]
FROM
CEPM_PLGR INNER JOIN CSIOWNER_PELM ON CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID = CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_ID
WHERE
((CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T&M" And (CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T7M") AND ((CSIOWNER_PELM.COST_MODE)="D")
AND ((CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID)<>" ")
UNION ALL SELECT
NULL AS [COST_ELEM_CTGY]
, NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_ID]
, NULL AS [COST_ELEM]
, NULL AS [SUM_UNIT]
, NULL AS [PRD]
, NULL AS [CUR_BUD]
, NULL AS [PRD_BUD]
, NULL AS [CURRENT_ACT]
, NULL AS [PERIOD_ACT]
, NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_DESC]
, NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_MGR]
, NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_TYPE]
, (IIf( [PROJECT ID] Like "N0160*" And "N8100*" And "N9004*"
,(NZ([COMMIT $],0))
,(NZ([COMMIT GA $],0)))) AS [COMMIT GA]
, NULL AS [COST_STAT]
, NULL AS [PROJ_NBR]
, [PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL].[COMMIT $] AS [COMMIT $]
FROM
[PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL]
WHERE [PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL].[PROJECT ID]
IN
(SELECT CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID AS [PROJ_ELEM_ID]
FROM
CEPM_PLGR INNER JOIN CSIOWNER_PELM ON CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID = CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_ID
WHERE
((CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T&M" And (CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T7M") AND ((CSIOWNER_PELM.COST_MODE)="D")
AND ((CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID)<>" ")) AND (([PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL].[PROJECT ID]) <> " ");
I think it is my where clause IN function. But I do not know how to fix it. any help would be great!!!!
Thanks in advanced, Kerrie
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2006
To fill a ddl list I could use a MINUS query. I found out that UNION and UNION ALL work, but MINUS doesn't.
Is there a way to make it work, or maybe an other way to solve this kind of problem?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2006
Hi Everyone.
I need help with union queries. The database that i am working with has union queries within it. I need to added information from a certain table into this query so that i can have a report generate more information when it is run. Please help if anyone knows how to work with union queries, or where i can go to find information on this.
Thank you:confused:
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2006
Okay, people. I am getting married in a few days and my mind is on other things. Consequently, I can't get my head around this one.
I have two queries, Query1 and Query2. Both have a different number of fields but they have the field "IA Code" in common.
I want to create a new query containing all rows from Query1 and all rows from Query2. Where the [IA Code] matches, I'd like the information to be displayed in one row.
I think I need to use Union somewhere along the lines, but I can't work it out.
Any pointers/syntax greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2006
I have a question regarding union queries, for the most part I understand them. You have to have the same amount of fields in both tables/queries, but what I do not know is do both tables/queries need to mimic each other 100%.
For example I have 2 Queries, both match each other identically in terms of fields and the order they are placed. What does not match is that I have one query with a "true" criteria under one field and the other query has a "true" in a seperate field.
When the query is ran I get "The number of colums in the two selected tables or queries of a union query do no match."
What is the purpose of the query, I am needing to combine these 2 queries into 1 for a report. If you need the code just ask and I shall post it.
Thanks ahead of time guys.
View 2 Replies
View Related
