How Difficult Is It To Make A Sychronisationfunction?
Oct 17, 2005
How difficult is it to make a sychronisationfunction?
I have a meetings database. Sometimes the meetings are enterd localy and need to be sychronized with the main file. Is this hard to do? where do i start.
One file is numbers I averaged over the past 3 months. The other file is actual numbers. Not all zip codes are in each file. I need to figure out the difference between the 2 and add the difference to this months numbers. So I created a query and found there were 94 records that matched based on zip cod and customer type. Then I found the difference in sales amounts. Now I'm stuck at figuring out which zip code and customer type don't match in the 2 files. So if zip code 10001 with customer type S isn't in the actual data for this month I need to add the zip code and customer type and have it be -303.23.
I’ve posted on here a few times lately, as I’m creating a database at work. It is going to be used to keep various information about new persons applying for jobs, and I want it be viewed/sorted by either 'Job Grade' or 'Job Title' I keep doing a lot, and then getting stuck on certain things. I’m stuck again, but I think it’s a little more difficult this time…
What I would like to happen is have the database open up, and a screen appears with two choices – ‘View by Job Title’ and ‘View by Job Grade’. When you click one, a new screen appears and a list of some sort appears with all of the job grades / job titles (depending on which button is pressed) on that are currently in the database.
From here, you can choose a job grade / title and it will bring up the form I have created – but only with the records that have the chosen job grade / title.
So for example, there could be 20 records in the table. 5 with job title ‘Manager’, 5 with job title ‘Assistant’. Then there could be 5 jobs with grade ’1’ and 5 jobs with grade ‘2’. When you clicked on ‘View by Job Title’ and then choose ‘Manager’, the 5 records with the job title ‘Manager’ would come up.
I hope I’m making sense so far.
The data would all be stored in one main table, and I already have the form created, so it would be good if I could use this.
Is there any way to do all of the above?
If anyone could help at all, it would be very much appreciated.
(This means: Between the amount of 0 and 100, the eventual amount equals to 5. Between 100 and 500, the evebtual amount is 10. etc. etc.)
Over the amount of 50,000 for every 5,000 the amount goes up, the eventual amount (column c) goes up 10, with the condition the eventual amount (column c) should not be over 500.
My current If-statement: Eventual Amount: IIf([Amount]<100,5,IIf([Amount],500,10,IIf([Amount]<100,15 etc. etc.)))
Is there an easier way to do this... It's going to take mighty long to do it like I am currently doing it. Thanks a lot Regards kruger101
I have a database for my company which I am making.
The products are hydraulic cranes and come in numerous models (or sizes), in turn these models come in numerous versions, 5 different ones in all, lets call them for simpleness 1-5. However, some cranes come in versions 1-3 only, others 4-5 only, some all versions and no-doubt some a random mix!
At present I have a table with the fields "Model" (Text), and seperate fields for each "Version" (ie. 1, 2, 3 etc), these are Yes/No tick boxes. Ticking a given box for any given model, means that only these options are available on a form. Ie When you select a "400" crane, you can for example only select Version numbers 1, 2 and 3 - those that are checked in this table.
What I need to do is when selecting each individual model on a particular order is to display 2 figures hydraulic oil flow-rate and also hydraulic pressure required from a reference table I assume. These figures are different for every given model/version combination.
The difficult part as I see is relating the yes/no check box from the table above to version number on the reference table.
Hi Everybody. I've been nosing around here because I have this difficult problem with a database design. I modelled my program in UML so I have a class diagram. Now I want to create an access database out of it, but this is too hard for me.
It's about a school project for flowers. Every year, they make a cross plan. This cross plan contains crossings. Many crossings. And every crossing exist from 2 genotypes. A mother and a father. With this crossing several new genotypes are created. How on earth do I realize that in a database? A plant is male as well as female so you don't need to indicate which sex it is.
Further more I want a genotype to be judged on his characteristics by a user as much as he wants to.
Well...I hope someone can help and if you have questions about it don't hesitate to ask.
Where [WeekUren] contains multiple references to unique records in [Projects].
[WeekUren] has the following collums which are important: -ProjID -Week -Persoon
Where these three always form an unique combination. For instance: 1 | 1 | 1 1 | 2 | 1 1 | 3 | 1 1 | 1 | 2 1 | 2 | 2 2 | 1 | 2
Saying: Person1 will work week 1 till 3 on Project1, Person2 will work week 1 and 2 on Project1 and week1 on Project2.
Weeks are here relative to the project start date (a value of [Projects]) and always start with and increment with 1. So week1 of Project 1 and 2 don't neccesarily fall on the same dates, hence Person2 is still able to work both Projects.
Bear with me here.....
Now I need to select all duplicate records (where people are assigned to two (or more) projects in the same real week.
Real week is defined by: Code:DatePart("ww",((WeekUren.Week-1)*7+(SELECT Projects.Start FROM Projects WHERE Projects.Id=WeekUren.ProjId)))
And the Query to convert [WeekUren] in to the relative form is: Code:SELECT WeekUren.Id, DatePart("ww",((WeekUren.Week-1)*7+(SELECT Projects.Start FROM Projects WHERE Projects.Id=WeekUren.ProjId))), WeekUren.Uren, WeekUren.Persoon, WeekUren.ProjIdFROM WeekUren;
The query to print out duplicates is ofcourse: Code:SELECT *FROM WeekUrenWHERE (((WeekUren.Week) In (SELECT [Week] FROM [WeekUren] As Tmp GROUP BY [Week],[Persoon] HAVING Count(*)>1 And [Persoon] = [WeekUren].[Persoon])))ORDER BY WeekUren.Week, WeekUren.Persoon;
Sofar so good, combination of the two however give me a syntax error. Hence my question here how to construct such a diabolical Query. Thanks!
I have a financial database that gets downloaded transactions off the internet from our accounts. The problem is that the transaction payer/payee is not always unique and needs to be classified. This is easy done using If statements but I really want to enter parts of the string into a table and have a query return a category for this payer/payee. Example: I want this: AUTO ONE CLARKSON CLARKSON WA AU006495 to be recognised as: car parts
or with this tranaction: CLARKSON MINI MART CLARKSON553908 look for "mini mart" and return supermarket
This step will make classifying transactions a lot simpler and user friendly. thanks
I have Two fields with DateWorked and EmployeeNumber. All I want to do is count the number of employees that worked on a specific date. In the employee numbers I have 4 dummy numbers that I don't want to count in my query (00001-00004), but will have entries almost each day. The rest are 5 digit numbers.
Some employee will work some days, but not others.
So I set up my query with:
EmployeeNumber Table Total: Count Criteria: >4
I did that think that it would count all employee numbers great than four, but all it seems to do is give me the count of days that more than 4 employees worked.
What am I doing wrong? I feel like this is simple, but after some of the more complex things I've done over the past week, this seemingly "easy" thing has me stumped.
Alright, so my pride and joy and departmental savior database has been fully implemented and people are so pleased with it that they *all* want to use it at the same time. Initially, I made it custom for three peoples' UI preferences, but since it's such an intuitive design, other staff now feel comfortable using it instead of passing the work down the line to the one person who knows how to use that "newfangled thing".
A couple years ago, I used FMPro and allowing for multiple users at once was an annoyingly complicated process dealing with permissions and rights and accounts and passwords and yadda yadda. Is it any easier to set up in Access? Does anything special even need to be done to allow for multiple simultaneous users?
This is a toughie (i think so anyway!). I'll attempt to explain!!!
I start with a CONTINUOUS form in my DB that shows all readings for a single given customer's connections. E.g. Customer A has 5 connections and each connection has say 3 readings. Thus this query which uses joins between the Customers, Connections, and Readings tables, would return a list of all readings for each connection, so in the above example: 1*5*3 = 15 records.
Not too tricky so far, but then what I want is for each connection to have just one line showing the latest reading (easily achieved by use of SQL Aggregate Max function on the date field coming from the readings table) TOGETHER WITH the last-but-one (next most recent) reading. So back to the example taking Customer A's connection 1, the row would be as follows:
Cust Conn CurReading PrevReading A 1 750 500
Where the CurReading value (750) comes from a different record than PrevReading (500).
I've tried all sorts of ways (subqueries etc.) to achieve this without success. The main problem being that any sub query would require parameters from the current record's fields, which seems not to be possible. Can anyone help or is this simply not possible in MSAccess Forms. If it isn't possible anyone have any suggestions as to an alternative way?
I'm currently working with a form, which is in datasheet view. I have many rows which are combo boxes (yes/no), and the name is rather long. So each line (each row) spreads on to 2-3 pages to the right.What I would like to do is make the namebar, on top of every column, a little bit higher, so the name would be split into two lines, or three. Allowing me to make the width allot smaller.Here is an example of my problem:http://213.213.137.96/~terminal/columns.jpgSo my question is, can I change the height of the column name? Or is there some trick I can use?regardsFrímann Kjerúlf
Would it be ok just to make a copy of the BE file (every so often) rather than to make a copy via code?The user can then just paste over the original if it becomes corrupt.
Hey guys.. I am trying to make my DB into an MDE file however that option which is in Tools > Database Utilities is not highlighted on this particular database. Anyone know why? Thanks!
EDIT - This features seems to be inactive on all atabases on my computer (I haven't tried another computer yet). I am using Access 2000 and running Win XP Hme. SP1.
I'm making my first commissioned database and I can't get my head around auto-lookups.
At the moment, I'm only working with tables because I want everything properly formatted and working at the table stage before I move on to making my forms, queries, reports, and eventually the switchboard.
What I want to do is when I call up a particular ID number in a table which has corresponding data in another table, I want the corresponding data, such as names and phone numbers, to come up automatically within the table.
My database has about eight tables in it and all are linked in someway, either because I need to create lookups, or because they will eventually be subforms.
So what I need is for someone to explain an easy way to get the tables to do what I want. I've looked up the Dlookup function in Access Help but it didn't make sense :confused:
Can someone help me please? I would REALLY appreciate it.
In my form I have the title of a CD which is under the name of 'CD_Title' which is taken from my CD's table and I was wondering how to show it up in a Label so when I flick through the albums the Label changes to the album that it is selected!
Being an Access newbie and all I knew nothing about the maximum number of TableIDs being 2048...really I just found out about TableIDs when the error message popped up. :o Is there a way around this, short of revamping the entire database?
I have a front end/back end app in AccessXP/Sql Server. I have a master version of the front end on my pc, and each user has a copy on their pc. Everything works fine. I wanted to go the last step in securing the project, so I converted to an MDE. Now, on some of the other PC's, any field in a form that has "NOW()" as the default value (unbound fields) displays the #NAME? error.
Any idea why it would work fine in a .MDB, but not in an .MDE?
I have 3 tables with which i want to extract columns from each of them and place them into a new table. The problem i have is that none of the tables share a common member. each table contains the same amount o rows spo when outputted to the new table will match up
The help for junctions says to make a compound key in the junction table, but I don't understand the intructions for this. Do they mean make all three of ID's the junction table PK's or is there a literal "Make a Compound Key" button somewhere?
Currently, the table has an AutoIncrementing field as the PK and the two FK's copied in from the Primaries (converted from Auto to Number). As a result, I can only make one-to-one relationships to the junction table.
SELECT testScreen, Count(ID) AS testCount FROM SERPTestInput GROUP BY testScreen
It returns a count for each testScreen that appears in the table.
Then this query returns the same thing except it joins another table and adds the criteria that the status for the record must be successful.
SELECT testScreen, Count(testID) AS myCount FROM Results RIGHT JOIN SERPTestInput ON (SERPTestInput.ID=Results.testID AND Results.testStatus = 'Successful') GROUP BY testScreen
So both queries currently generate an 8 row table with the first column being the testScreen and the second being a count. I would like to somehow combine the two so I get a three column, 8 riow table. Column 1 would still be the testScreen, column 2 the total count for each testScreen and column 3 would be the successful count for each test screen.
In short, can the above two queries be combined into one?