I have a sql server query that I need to use in access 2003 but I can not figure out how to convert the "not in" part of the query. Here is the sql server query
Select * from accounts where beg_date between '1/1/2013' and '12/31/2013' and cast(acctNo,integer) in (2,3,4,5,7,12,20) and acct_type not in ('Individual','User','Viewer')
I can not find how to do the "not in" in access sql.
I have a query result for example = 2.19 days worked. The result of cumulated hours divided by 8 (hours in the workday). What I want to do is take the .19 and multiply it by 8 (hours in the workday) and I would have the result in actual hours which is what I need. Or of course if there is a way to display that into 2 days and 1.52 hours Rounded up to quarters would be even better. But with spending hours looking through forums I didn't find a way to just work with the decimals right of the dot. Trim, format, Len didn't work for me, they all give me funny result.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am in the process of building a new database in SQL to replace my MS Access database. However, I will continue to use the Access forms, queries, and reports. The new tables will house much of the same data. In multiple tables I have hyperlinks that were created and added in the original Access tables. To import these hyperlinks into the new SQL tables I have converted them to 'Long Text' before exporting, thus changing them into strings.
For example:
Hyperlink - Email - Add Additional Mailbox to Outlook (2010) has been changed to:
Email - Add Additional Mailbox to Outlook (2010)#ServernameServerfolderDocumentationRea dy to GoOutlook TemplatesEmail - Add Additional Mailbox to Outlook (2010).oft#
The obvious issue that I am running into is that after the SQL database table has been linked to the Access database it still displays the entire string when I open the table. The form has a textbox and search button that is used as a search function. This runs a query that returns all "search results" for the desired information. Is there a way that the query can convert the string back into a hyperlink so that the query displays just Email - Add Additional Mailbox to Outlook (2010) as a hyperlink and not the entire string?
I have a table in access database which contains a text field 'EDate' that stores Date value in format (12-Apr-2013). Now I want to run a sql query on that field. User will give an input date. The sql query needs to fetch me all the records from access database whose Edate is less than or equal to the user input date.
I am using DateValue function to convert my text filed Edate into date. My query is something like this:
select * from table_name where DateValue(EDate)<='user_input_date'
I am able to perform above task if the system language settings are 'English'. But if system language settings are different say Turkish, then the query fails.
I searched a lot on web and found that DateTime function compares test data with the system date time format and gives the result. Thus it fails with different language settings.
I have what I think is a difficult problem to overcome...
I am designing a form to create an invoice. The user will select a workstream and a date range in form frmInvByHrs. Within this I want two sub-forms, one is frmInvByHrsTsht and the other is frmInvByHrsBill. I want the first one to display all the staff and their hours done, and the second one to be in data entry mode where you can enter the hours you want to bill. Each sub-form is based on a separate query.
Is it possible to do this? ie. to have one sub-form in data entry mode, and the other not? It seems to me that the data entry mode is controlled by the MAIN form regardless of the sub-form settings!
If this is not possible, do you know how I can acheive this?
Thanks
S
Hi everyone,
I have refined my query from previous threads to involved a module function. This calculates more acurately no of working days between dates and takes into account a holidays table. (All credit to Arvin Meyer on the module:) )
However because the Leave Year starts at the 1 July and finishes 30 Jun I need to compose the date for any current year Year(Now())
Enclosed scrdmp shows my query design. I can easily get it to work as you see it, but obviously as each year rolls over, the year needs to change.
Have looked at many posts but can't find what I'm looking for. This one will get me over the hurdle.
Many thanks,
I have a table - RDC/NDC - that holds details about various warehouses, including a field - [Short_Code] (TEXT) - to hold the warehouse short code or ID.
I have an import table - PickDataImport - that contains details of goods picked, including a field - ToAssignRef (TEXT) - that is made up of 3 elements; Type-Short_Code-Date (EG GREEN-MAN-210215).
I am trying to create a query that will return the warehouse name from RDC/NDC by looking up the depot short code in the ToAssignRef.
The Type element of ToAssignRef can be any length of text.
I am thinking i need to use HAVING or IN (or a combination) but everything i try fails - either blank or errors.
I have a criteria in a parameter query that asks the user to enter a Subsystem number (such as 4596-666-001).
The source data for my database has Systems (e.g, 4596-666) and each system has several Subsystems associated with it (e.g, 4596-666-001, 4596-666-002, etc). The System and Subsystem numbers are stored in the same column of the source data spreadsheet, and hence the same field in my database.
The source data is structured in such a way that Systems and Subsystems have different information. I would like to set up a query that shows the System information as well as the Subsystem information.
For example, if the user enters 4596-666-001 into the parameter dialog box the query returns all the information for 4596-666-001 and 4596-666 (but NOT any other Subsystem).
As a work around I have set up an OR situation where the user first enters the Subsystem number and then another parameter query dialog opens and they enter the System number. This works but is not as nice as simply entering the Subsystem number and having all information returned.
Is there a way to set up my query so the when 4596-666-001 is entered an OR is generated using the first 8 characters of the Subsystem number?
I need to give the user the ability to select either all of a table say
[tblStores].StoreNo
or only those stores where [tblStores].StoreNo Is Null
I cant for the life of me get my query to accept Null or Is Not Null in the parameter box.
What do I need to do.The end game is to produce a subform to allow users to maintain tblStores
eg
tblStore
StoreNo | StoreNm
000001 | StoreA
<Empty>| StoreB
000003 | StoreC
Null returns
Store B
Is Not Null returns
StoreA
StoreB
StoreC
I am trying to group records in a query and count them. I have records containing ABC12345
ABC67890
ABE12345
ABE67890
Basically the third letter is what I need to group on so that I can count the number of records with ABC, ABE and any other variant of the third letter but with the numbers all varying all over the place.In the example above I want to find ABC 2 and ABE 2.
I have a manual date format that looks something like:
02/16/2015 09:06:15 AM PST
I would like to truncate the text so that just the date is showing. For all that I have found, I can remove a string from the beginning? any tips on removing a string from the end?
I have a query that will be assisting me find pricing based upon quantity ranges of specific equipment for a given FY.
I'm no access expert, and I keep getting "You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified expression...as part of an aggregate function".
I have tried several things, but cannot seem to figure this one out.
The SQL of my query is as follows:
SELECT IIf(Nz(Sum([Current Orders]![Quantity]))+Nz([forms]![04c Test Query for ROM Support]![Quantity])
Between 1 And 4,[04b Pricing Products]![01-04],IIf(Nz(Sum([Current Orders]![Quantity]))+
Nz([forms]![04c Test Query for ROM Support]![Quantity])
Between 5 And 10,[04b Pricing Products]![05-10],
IIf(Nz(Sum([Current Orders]![Quantity]))+Nz([forms]![04c Test Query for ROM Support]![Quantity])
[Code] .....
I have to sort out a database of goods where many doublets have been created over time. Unfortunately each doublet/triplet/multiplet can be disguised by not having ANY fields common with the other versions. The only pointer I have is that the SKU of a copy contains the SKU of the original. I have some 6000 SKU's.
I want to identify each SKU that has been copied, and into what SKU or SKUs.
tblSKUs
----------
Seq : sequential numerator for shiwing it on AWF
ID: Id of the item (Autonumber)
SKU: SKU (Text)
Code:
Seq ID sku
1 2205 MQAC2212
2 17416 MQAC2212-black-s-x
3 2258 MQAC2232
4 12815 MQAC2232-red-X
5 2283 MQAC2254
6 13028 MQAC2254-00
7 16278 MQAC2254-red-s-x
8 16298 MQAC2254-red-s-x1
9 16304 MQAC2254-red-s-x2
10 16313 MQAC2254-red-s-x3
11 2302 MQACP
12 12751 MQACP100-X
13 17468 MQBA201-1-s-x
14 17476 MQBA403-1-s-x
15 17216 MQBA503-1-s-x
In the above table, item with Seq 2 is a copy of 1, 4 is a copy of 3, 6-10 are copies of 5, and 12 is copy of 11. Each copied SKU is thus the original SKU + some more characters. Minimum length for an SKU is 4. No maximum length.
I can do anything using VBA, but need to get inspiration to do minimum possible using queries.I would be happy to get a table like this ( for each copy in RH column, the Orginal is listed in the LH)
Code:
Original Copy
MQAC2212 MQAC2212-black-s-x
MQAC2232 MQAC2232-red-X
MQAC2254 MQAC2254-00
MQAC2254 MQAC2254-red-s-x
MQAC2254 MQAC2254-red-s-x1
MQAC2254 MQAC2254-red-s-x2
MQAC2254 MQAC2254-red-s-x3
MQACP MQACP100-X
can I do this with plain queries?
Excel in Access (Part 1) (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=671226)
Excel in Access (Part 3) (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=143970)
Video Version HERE: (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=144045)
How to use the Normalization Form (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=143983)
In Excel in Access (Part 1), we went from this:
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/StudentTableBoolean_2.png
To this:
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/StudentTableTransposed2.png
This was achieved with a form based tool available to DOWNLOAD here. (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=20619&d=1202664804)
See instructions on its use here: (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=143983)
However you may be looking at the new resultant table and wondering what on earth to do with it. I hope to take you through the process of making it into something useful in this thread.
The first thing you will notice is that where the check box is not checked, then that whole row is redundant, for instance there’s no need to record that ID number “1” --- “Has Not” taken Maths, English, Geography, Physics etc, it would suffice just to record the subjects that have been taken , In this case Biology, PT and Social. Looking at those entries in particular, then a general rule of logic can be defined, “delete all the rows where the check boxes are false”.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1b.png
Once you have deleted all of those rows,
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1c.png
then it becomes obvious that the check boxes themselves which now “All” contain a true value are also redundant, they can be deleted just leaving you the text entry identifying the subject taken by each student.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1d.png
Using the “relational” properties of the database that is one more thing you can do which will improve efficiency and that is to replace each text entry --- Maths, English, Geography, Physics etc, with a number linking that field to a look up table.
First of all you need to create a look up table; this can be done by applying a create table query to extract just the unique values for the “subject” There is a video showing how to do this here: (At time index 1min) (http://www.viddler.com/explore/TonyHine/videos/67/fullscreen)
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1e.png
This unique list should be called “tblSubject” this table is not quite finished, you need to add an identity column to the left of the text representing the individual subject, this identity will then appear in the previous table.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1f.png
Once you have completed the “look up table” you then need to replace the entries in the student subject table “tblStudentSubject” where it shows subject in text form with the number representing the link to the look up table. This is the query:
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1g.png
And here is the new column created:
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1h.png
This way your design changes to the table are making it much more efficient, holding the same information but with less data.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm_1k.png
Excel in Access (Part 1) (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=671226)
Excel in Access (Part 2) (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=143607)
Video Version HERE: (http://msaccesshintsandtips.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=948619%3ABlogPost%3A7031)
How to use the Normalization Form (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=143983)
Using the normalization form --- Download Here (http://www.access-programmers.co.uk/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=20619&d=1202664804) we converted part of a spreadsheet type table into the beginnings of a relational table.
From this table we derived a “look up table” now giving us a total of three tables, the remains of the first table, “tblStudent” (the student names), the next table “tblStudentSubject” stores the subject(s) related to each student, and finally a third table, “tblSubject” a “look-up table” to store the actual subject description.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/ThreeTables.png
From the table “tblStudentSubject” we created a form in datasheet view:
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DataSheetForm.png
Now all we need do is combine this datasheet view form with a form based on the students list, and this will give us a form for correctly displaying the student names and the subject(S) the student is taking in one Form:
Using the wizard create a basic form from the student table and name it “frmStudent” arrange its size so it has some open space as shown.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/StudentForm.png
Now open “frmStudent” in design view
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DragSub_1.png
And drag the subform “sfrmlStudentSubject” into the clear area on the student form “frmStudent”
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DragSub_2.png
You may wish to delete the text box, you don’t have to but I usually find it looks better without it.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DragSub_3.png
Size the form to suit
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DragSub_4.png
Now save the form and have a look, you will notice that it incorrectly shows all of the records in the subform,
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DragSub_5.png
Now the next bit is tricky, for two reasons, the form isn’t really on top of the other form, it actually sits in a subform window and you need to gain access to the properties of this subform window by clicking on the tiny line that you can just see around your subform. This can be a difficult task to master first time.
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DragSub_6.png
Now open the “subform field linker” dialog box by clicking on the ellipsis (…)
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x317/UncleGizmo/DragSub_7.png
Phone: +44 1635 522233
Mobile: +44 7747 018875
Email: email@tonyhine.co.uk
Web: http://msaccesshintsandtips.ning.com
We have a field that we track paperwork with that is 9 characters. The first 4 characters are a 'julian date', the 5th character is a dash and the last 4 characters are sequential.
Example:
For today, we would use 4085-0001, 4085-0002, 4085-0003, etc.
For yesterday: 4084-0001, 4084-0002, etc.
I have a query set up that will pull records with a julian date of today-1 and today-7 that works. So a result I may get:
4084-0001
4084-0002
4081-0000
4078-0000
4078-0001
4078-0002
I tried formatting the source field with Left -4, but it only shows the first four characters in the result:
4084
4084
4081
4078
4078
4078
How can I count the number of records each day based on only the first four characters? Example:
4084 = 2
4081 = 1
4078 = 3
I have been given a list of UK postcodes, with the following format L15TG or TS14TGU.
I need to be able to match these postcodes to a list of postcodes I have stored in the database, however, my list are only UK outcodes, so L15TG is just L1 and TS14TGU is just TS14.
So I need to match the records and return the part of the string that matches i.e take L1 from L15TG.
I have a query with a date field that is formatted mm/dd/yyyy. I have a combo box that is formatted as mm/yyyy. I need the choice from the combo box to be the criteria for the date field in the query. the combo box has to contain the month and year only (which it does now) and the query must return mm/dd/yyyy. I have tried a few statements and the closest I got was a between statement that added 30 days to the combo box selection but that's not really accurate.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a table of the following structure:
Key 1 Key 2 Key 3 Optional
data1 data2 data3 data4
The 'key' fields are a composite key of primary key fields from other separate tables. I have a form that generates a new 'Key 1' record and I would like to make a query that creates all possible 'Key 2' and 'Key 3' results (new combinations) while key 1 stays the same. How would I go about doing this? I know I can be done.
I cannot really give any real data as I haven't received it yet.
I have a query where I want to add sequential counting to all items that are part of a group. I have grouped the query on MaterialCode and want to add a sequencial counter for all orders that have been assigened to a materialcode
For Example:
Key MaterialCode Order Counter
abc1 111111A 987654 1
abc2 111111A 687654 2
abc3 222222B 655511 1
abc4 333333A 251544 1
abc5 333333A 555555 2
I have a calculated field (Bhours) with the following IIf function:
=IIf(Fields!BDate.Value<=Parameters!Pdate.Value and Fields!EDate.Value>Parameters!Pdate.Value,Fields!H ours.Value,0)
It works perfectly, but I don't like the fact that it has a zero for the false part as I like the field to the blanc instead of filled with a zero.I can't use a space as I need to calculate with this field later on. I tried using "", but then the field displays #error".
We are trying to use Access to generate, job, task and craft numbers in Access. Job and task will be unique. Craft numbers can use the auto number function. We need the numbers to be 4 digits for Job and Task.
View 2 Replies View RelatedRecently I am using this code to import the data in a excel sheet into Access table:
Code:
DoCmd.TransferText acImport, , strcTableName, strFullPath, True
But this will import all the data in that worksheet into the Access table.What I want to implement is to import part of the data. For example, the data I need is start from Row30 till the end, thus I don't need the data from Row1 to Row29.
I've created the following but it keeps coming up with the error message You tried to execute a query that does not include the specified expression 'ICE Team' as part of an aggregate function.
SELECT ztSub.[Master Sheet].[ICE Team], ztSub.[date], Count(ztSub.[Count])
FROM (SELECT [Master Sheet].[ICE Team],[Master Sheet].[Visit Date (planned for)] AS [date],Count([Master Sheet]![Visit Date (planned for)]) AS [Count]
FROM [Master Sheet]
UNION
SELECT [Master Sheet].[ICE Team],[Master Sheet].[Date retasked to?] AS [date], Count ([Master Sheet]![Date retasked to?]) AS [Count]
FROM [Master Sheet] ) AS ztSub
GROUP BY ztSub.[Master Sheet].[ICE Team];
I need to get an average repair price of multiple part numbers with the same root number i.e.
8 each 8TJ124GGN1
4 each 8TJ124GGM1
7 each 8TJ124GGP1
First I used a query to average the repair price of each subset of numbers, and then queried the query to average all the subset prices together.
If I simply use the AVG function in the first query, I can use it again in the second query to get the average price of all the subset price averages. HOWEVER, if I use the expression:
AdjustedAvgLabor: Int((Sum([LaborPrice])-Max([LaborPrice])- Min([LaborPrice]))/(Count([LaborPrice])-2))
…to get a more accurate average by throwing out the high and low values, I get a:
“…expression too complicated to be evaluated”
when I try to average the averages in the second query using the AVG function.
I don’t know why the expression is “too complicated” since the first query has already completed its computations before the second query begins its AVG function.
Hi,
A few years ago Ive made an access database on access 2000. The problem is that now Ive installed the office 2003, and I cant make the database work properly.
At first says that are missing those files: tshoot.ocx, msioff9.ocx and msowc.dll; so, Ive copy them from another computer using office 2000 and now only complains about msioff9.ocx saying that my database contains a reference incomplete to it.
Is there no other way to convert my database do work properly with access 2003? What can I do?
Regards