I have been given a list of UK postcodes, with the following format L15TG or TS14TGU.
I need to be able to match these postcodes to a list of postcodes I have stored in the database, however, my list are only UK outcodes, so L15TG is just L1 and TS14TGU is just TS14.
So I need to match the records and return the part of the string that matches i.e take L1 from L15TG.
I have a number of short postcodes ie
S43
GU10
ME8
etc etc
I want a run query to return only first characters before the numbers ie..
S
GU
ME
I have created a table which holds transactions which can be both positive and negative. To this table i have added an extra column that shows the Absolute values which end results is as follows:
YYYY MM Currency Amount ABS
2013 10 EUR 50.000 50.000
2013 10 EUR -50.000 50.000
2013 10 EUR 49.995 49.995
2013 10 EUR -50.000 50.000
I need to create a table that shows those positive and negative transactions that can be netted of. I have been able to create a query with the following SQL code:
Code:
SELECT tbl_All_Absolute.[Posting Account], tbl_All_Absolute.Jnl, tbl_All_Absolute.CCYY,
tbl_All_Absolute.PP, tbl_All_Absolute.[Batch Num], tbl_All_Absolute.[Trans Num], tbl_All_Absolute.[Detail Reference],
tbl_All_Absolute.Amount, tbl_All_Absolute.RFPNum, tbl_All_Absolute.[Transaction Ref 1], tbl_All_Absolute.[Transaction Ref 2],
tbl_All_Absolute.[Transaction Ref 3], tbl_All_Absolute.[Transaction Ref 4], tbl_All_Absolute.Expr1
FROM tbl_All_Absolute
WHERE (((tbl_All_Absolute.Expr1) In (SELECT [Expr1] FROM [tbl_All_Absolute] As Tmp GROUP BY [Expr1] HAVING Count(*)>1 )));
Unfortunately (but obviously) the code will list 3x the 50,000 transactions and leaves out the 49.995.
My knowledge in Access is not that of an expert and i am wondering if there is a way for Access to only include the first 2 transactions (the +50.000 and the -50.000)?
I have 3 main tables: tblEmployees, tblJobs, and tblProcedures. (See attachment for relationship diagram and additional supplemental tables).A job can have multiple procedures and an employee can have multiple procedures too.
I need to write a query such that when searching by a specific job I can see all of the employees who are qualified for that job. This is done by seeing which employees have the procedures that belong to a job. But here's the catch: since a job can have multiple procedures, if an employee only has some of the procedures I don't want that particular employee to return as a search result. The employee must have ALL the procedures that belong to the selected job.
So for instance if I have:
tblJobs
Job1
tblEmployees
Emloyee1
Employee2
[code]...
If I search by Job1, I want only Employee2 to return as a result, NOT Employee1.I am at a lost for how to construct the SQL for something like that.
I understand that a query can accept wildcards in the search criteria but this is different.
I have a form on which a user selects a [product] part number in an unbound combo e.g. "12345-V111".
I then need a subform on the form to list records where the relevant field matches the left most part of this part number but is not necessarily complete. e.g. records with "12345-V1" would be returned, records with "12345-V2" wouldn't. The number of characters recorded in this field will vary, but if the characters that are entered match, then the record should be listed.
In other words, the record entries themselves need to be treated like wildcard entries.
I have lookup table I use to return names for various "Sales Class" codes.It all works good but if there is a code that isn't in the lookup table it leaves that field empty.I want it to return the word "Unknown" for any code that doesn't have a match.Here is the SQL:
Code:
SELECT [Data1].OrderNum, SalesClasses.[Name]
FROM [Data1]
LEFT JOIN SalesClasses ON [Data1].[Sales Class] = SalesClasses.[Code1];
Table examples:
Data1:
OrderNum - Sales Class
111 - class1
222 - class2
333 - classX
[code]...
undefinedHi, apologies if this has been answered before but can't find anything relevant!
Trying to match one field to the first 5 digits in another i.e.
Field 1 = 55667
Field 2 = 5566785431 so would want to match the 1st five digits in field 2...
Any ideas?
Thanks
I am using an apply filter in a form to find records in a split form.
The macro which I am using is:
[SLIDE] Like "*" & [Forms]![SALES]![ENTERREFDATA] & "*"
However I the filter to return only records which match the text exactly.
I have a text box ( Supplier_Name) on the main form i would like to filter subform by any part of entered charactor on the feild (suplier_Name)
Code:
Private Sub Find_Click()
If Not IsNull(Supplier_Name) Then
Me.Suppliers_Details.Form.Filter = "[Supplier_Name] = '" & Me.Supplier_Name & "'"
.FilterOn = True
Exit Sub
End If
End Sub
this code is work fine but i have to enter all the characters of long name , but i would like to only insert few chars.
I have a query pulling data from several tables. In the middle I've got join between a part number in a BOM table and a part number in an inventory table.
What I want is the query to return the inventory location when we have stock. When we have nothing in, then there would be no entry in the inventory table and it should return a blank or null in this and all the proceeding tables.
Can this be done?
Hey all
I have a table that contains a list of news items. For each item there is a link to an appropriate image and a load of text.
I display a list menu of news items showing the picture and the first few lines of text. At the moment for the first few lines of text I have a separate field and just copy and paste the first few lines of the main article into it.
My question is is there a way where instead of having to have a separate field with just the first few lines in I can somehow just retrieve the first few lines of data from the full article field when displaying the menu listing?
Hope this makes sense, and any ideas greatly appreciated.
Many thanks
I'm comparing two tables in a query, the tables are information that was imported from other sources. When I compare the tables, I'm trying to get a one to one result (a reconciliation of sorts). The problem is that there are duplicate line items in one of the tables that may or may not be valid, but all are considered matched. How can I create my query to match to only one line item and leave the others unmatched for analysis? I've tried everything but VBA (of which I have little experience in). Any suggestions?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to find company matches between 2 tables. The issue I have is that the spellings on table A differs from table B.Some of the differences are minimal like "St. Annes" and "St Annes". And some really big "St. Annes" and "Annes, ST London".
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a database with 3000 + records all with customers from all over the UK.
The CUSTOMER table contains
>customer ID
>name
>address
>postcode
I have been asked to produce reports from the database.
These reports should group all customers into postcodes regions and then display information accordingly. E.g how many customers have ordered information in region 1.
For each region I have been give a list of postcodes.
Region 1, e.g LS17, LS18
Region 2 e.g BD4 0,
Region 3 ETC
Region 4 ETC
Each region list is extremely long to type in but I have a copy on paper.
Could someone help and guide me into a quick way of grouping the required postcodes into regions 2 enable the reports to be produced.
One way I have done this is by doing a select query and typing in the criteria “like “LS1*” or like LS18*” …and by typing this on and on to the list this is quite long.
Plus I need to be able to use the * function so I select the correct postcodes.
As this is so time consuming ..Bearing this in mind I have been told a far better approach is to put the postcodes in a table and then perform a lookup on that table when trying to determine the region.
I don’t understand what to do…would this be a better approach if so how would I do this as I don’t know how to use lookup? Could someone help me? Perhaps with a small example so I could follow it? :(
Appreciate any help
Many thanks
I have a database with 3000 + records all with customers from all over the UK.
The CUSTOMER table contains
>customer ID
>name
>address
>postcode
I have been asked to produce reports from the database.
These reports should group all customers into postcodes regions and then display information accordingly. E.g how many customers have ordered information in region 1.
For each region I have been give a list of postcodes.
Region 1, e.g LS17, LS18
Region 2 e.g BD4 0,
Region 3 ETC
Region 4 ETC
Each region list is extremely long to type in but I have a copy on paper.
Could someone help and guide me into a quick way of grouping the required postcodes into regions 2 enable the reports to be produced.
One way I have done this is by doing a select query and typing in the criteria “like “LS1*” or like LS18*” …and by typing this on and on to the list this is quite long.
Plus I need to be able to use the * function so I select the correct postcodes.
As this is so time consuming ..Bearing this in mind I have been told a far better approach is to put the postcodes in a table and then perform a lookup on that table when trying to determine the region.
I don’t understand what to do…would this be a better approach if so how would I do this as I don’t know how to use lookup? Could someone help me? Perhaps with a small example so I could follow it?
Appreciate any help
Many thanks
I have what I think is a difficult problem to overcome...
I am designing a form to create an invoice. The user will select a workstream and a date range in form frmInvByHrs. Within this I want two sub-forms, one is frmInvByHrsTsht and the other is frmInvByHrsBill. I want the first one to display all the staff and their hours done, and the second one to be in data entry mode where you can enter the hours you want to bill. Each sub-form is based on a separate query.
Is it possible to do this? ie. to have one sub-form in data entry mode, and the other not? It seems to me that the data entry mode is controlled by the MAIN form regardless of the sub-form settings!
If this is not possible, do you know how I can acheive this?
Thanks
S
This must be the easiest of things, but I haven't used access in a while in now in my new job I need to run the following query.
I have to select a number of postcodes from a single table to see how many are in there. For example select postcodes beginning with B, CV, DY, HR, ST, TF, WR, WS, WW. Then I need to write down how many records found with the above postcodes.
Also I may have to omit some too like omit CV12
Thank you in advance
Hi everyone;
I am using Access 2003 with Windows XP Pro. I have a problem with using a query and the dreaded UK Postcodes!
I have a Client table that contains a field “Client Postcode 1”, in which is entered the first part of the UK postcode i.e. AB11, WC1A, E1, EC2V, etc.
In a Candidate table here are many text fields where we enter which postcode a Candidate wants to work in, i.e. TN, CV4, EC, W, etc.
We have a separate Candidate Search form where we select a particular client (Combo box from the Client table) which then displays the Client’s Postcode 1 data i.e. the first part of the UK postcode before the space.
We have a select query that then tries to match the Client Postcode 1 with the postcode that the Candidate wants to work in from the Candidate’s table.
In this query design grid I have successfully created criteria that will match the Client Postcode 1 field to the Candidate’s postcode field – very straightforward. This, for example, will match a Client with a TN39 postcode with a Candidate who wants to work in the TN39 postcode.
In the same query design grid I have also been able to successfully match the Client Postcode 1 field to a Candidate’s Postcode field using just the first 2 letters (using Left). This matches a Candidate who wants to work anywhere in the TN postcode area (TN1, TN2 etc.) with a Client whose postcode starts with TN
However, what is stumping me is where a Client’s Post code has only 1 letter followed by numbers (E1, B2 etc) in the first part of their postcode without returning EX, BL etc. I would like the accumulated wisdom on this forum to point me in the right direction to design criteria to input into the query design grid that will match ONLY the first letter of the postcode IF the second character is a number.
Regards to all - and what an excellent site!
Is there a way to have a query return only records where the text in two fields doesn't match?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a table that lists Cost Center, Partner, and Cost. I need a query to sum the cost when Cost Center and Partner do not match. How can I write that expression?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have several tables that I need to join together to create a single form for multiple entries. Job Table, OPR Table, Organization, Program List Table, Program Notes, Rank, Reference Table, and Status Table.
Ultimately, I need to be able to display all of these in one form and allow for adding/editing notes from the Program Notes section. I also need to be able to let the user look up all info by selecting the Program Name and have the other field populate correctly. The issue I am running into is that I cannot get the Program Notes table to join to the Program List table correctly.
This is what I attempted to use in SQL:
SELECT [Program Name], [Status], [Reference], [Self-Inspection], [IG Checklist], [Continuity Book], [Bragging Paper], [Program Strengths], [ORI Reports], [Best Practices]
FROM [Program List Table]
UNION
SELECT [Log Date], [Log Entry]
FROM [Program Notes]
However, I keep getting an error. I have read that it is because I don't have the same amount of columns, but the tables don't have the same information.I have also tried to do it through a normal query and through a third table, however I get errors about ambiguous outer joins and I can't seem to make that work either.
I have parent-child one to many data in one pair of relationships, and now I've been asked to see be able to find out what matches a defined regimen; each is also defined in a parent-child relationship.
Best is to show sample data. I'm going to show them as two tables, but the "Components" are actually in a parent-child relationship, e.g.,
PersonList -= Meds
Regimen -= Meds as well
Note that PersonList and Regimen do not really have any relation; we just want to see if things are being done one of the ways they are "supposed" to be done, without a slow manual check. It's worked as set up for reports, and I really don't want to change everything to a big long list of fields, one field per med for a lot of reasons (not least of which is that is denormalizing)
Quy 1 Result:
PersList T1Component
Andrew Med 1
Andrew Med 2
Brett Med 1
Brett Med 3
Brett Med 4
Charles Med 2
Duane Med 1
Duane Med 4
Quy 2 Result
Regimen T2Component
Goody1 Med 1
Goody1 Med 3
Goody1 Med 4
Goody2 Med 1
Goody2 Med 2
I'd like to be able to do two queries - one that are "OK" one that are not. Don't need to replicate the med list, just the regimen if matching..
"Good" would return
Person Regimen
Andrew Goody2 (he has med 1, 3, and 4)
Brett Goody1 (he has med 1 and 2)
"Bad" would return
Person
Charles
Duane
What they "almost match" does not matter; it tells people which ones we need to check into a bit more.
I have a db which has a query. This query is rather simple where it filters fields based on criteria. Here is the SQL VIEW:
SELECT DSResult.STATUS, DSResult.TESTCODE, DSResult.BATCHNO, DSResult.TESTNO, DSResult.TESTDATE, DSResult.CODE
FROM DSResult
WHERE (((DSResult.STATUS)="TESTED") AND ((DSResult.TESTCODE)="41015" Or (DSResult.TESTCODE)="41016") AND ((DSResult.BATCHNO)<>"1") AND ((DSResult.TESTDATE)>=#1/18/2010#))
ORDER BY DSResult.TESTCODE, DSResult.TESTDATE, DSResult.CODE;
I need to alter this query so that where records that have the same "DSResult.CODE" and counted are greater than 20 occurrences and then display only these records sorted in DSRESULT.Code order.
I have a table with Part No. and their correlating descriptions. I have a second table with a Product Number and its assosciated Part No. I want to view all of my Part No. with descriptions and IF there is a match to the Part No on the second table, I want to see the associated Product Number. Below is the layout and SQL on my test tables.
Test_Items1 (My Table)
Part No = 1317667223606 Desc1 = ABC123
Part No = 1317667223614 Desc1 = ABC456
Test_Products1 (Customer Data)
Product Number = 14_01 Referenced Item = 1317667223606 1317667223735 1317667224517 1317667225406
SQL (Which isn't working for me)
SELECT Test_Items1.[Part No], Test_Items1.[Item SX Descrip1], Test_Products1.[Product Number]
FROM Test_Items1 LEFT JOIN Test_Products1 ON Test_Items1.[Part No] LIKE "*" & Test_Products1.[Referenced Item] & "*";
The Desired Results from my above scenario would be this
Part No = 1317667223606 Desc1 = ABC123 Product Number = 14_01
Part No = 1317667223614 Desc1 = ABC456 Product Number = Null/Blank
The Part No from Test_Items1 may not always be the first string from the Test_Products1.Referenced Item. It may appear anywhere withing that group of Part Nos. The customer has them separated by spaces.
Hi everyone,
I have refined my query from previous threads to involved a module function. This calculates more acurately no of working days between dates and takes into account a holidays table. (All credit to Arvin Meyer on the module:) )
However because the Leave Year starts at the 1 July and finishes 30 Jun I need to compose the date for any current year Year(Now())
Enclosed scrdmp shows my query design. I can easily get it to work as you see it, but obviously as each year rolls over, the year needs to change.
Have looked at many posts but can't find what I'm looking for. This one will get me over the hurdle.
Many thanks,
I have a sql server query that I need to use in access 2003 but I can not figure out how to convert the "not in" part of the query. Here is the sql server query
Select * from accounts where beg_date between '1/1/2013' and '12/31/2013' and cast(acctNo,integer) in (2,3,4,5,7,12,20) and acct_type not in ('Individual','User','Viewer')
I can not find how to do the "not in" in access sql.