I'm having a small problem where Access returns a "Query too complex" error when I try to run a Union query of the form:
Code:
SELECT CourseNumber, CourseTitle, [Date], TotalScore, "Two (2) zero visibility dives?" AS [Question], CountZeroVisibility AS [NegativeResponses]
FROM qryScore
UNION ALL
SELECT CourseNumber, CourseTitle, [Date], TotalScore, "One (1) night dive?" AS [Question], CountNightDive AS [NegativeResponses]
FROM qryScore
UNION ALL
...etc
I'm having a problem with a UNION / UNION ALL query.It seems there is a application crash fault when running the query that MS are aware of and have issued a hot fix. Unfortunately it will take my IT dept some time to check and install the hot fix If they agree to do it at all.
Problem signature: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: MSACCESS.EXE Application Version: 12.0.6606.1000
I have two basic lists of employee names, ID's, phone numbers etc, with one field containing an attachment with a picture of their ID. I don't want to permanently combine these two lists of employees, as they work in different departments, but for certain events I need to be able to print a report with a list of all their names, ID numbers, and corresponding ID photos.
I tried to make a UNION query, but can't do it with the attachment field. If I leave that field out, it's no problem. To simplify, I have been doing a test run as follows, with just the name field and photo field (field 1).
SELECT [Starting Gate employees].[Employee name], [Starting Gate employees].Field2 FROM [Starting Gate employees] UNION SELECT [Farrier employees].[Employee name], [Farrier employees].Field2 FROM [Farrier employees];
I have three queries that make a training list based on a person's role, team, and ad-hoc exceptions. The personnelID field is filtered by a listbox on a form. Each of these work great on their own (nice!). Now I want to combine them. I made the below union query that works... however when it is run, I am prompted to enter the personnelID again. This prompt only happens once. Do I need to incorporate a qhere statement somewhere, even though each of the individual queries have them already?
SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByRole UNION ALL SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByTeam UNION ALL SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByAdHocPersonnel;
The where statement of potential use:
Code: WHERE (((tblPersonnel.PersonnelID)=[Forms]![frmMain]![lbxPersonnel]));
Im trying to join two queries as I am unable to use just a single query but I cant use a union query as the query fields aren't exactly the same.
Both queries have a PO_Detail field as every PO has a PO_Detail number assigned to it. 3 of the same records are in both query results but one query is missing the other two results.
If I create a join between the two queries based on this field I don't get all the results. Unfortunately I cant upload the database as it has sensitive data which would take me ages to clear out but I can show a picture of the results.
Am trying many times in UNION query but its not working because there is different field names and only some fields are matched. So I need to both query's are combine in 1 query.
Above both queries are already combined in UNION query as (Customer Credit Transaction Final) its not a problem.So now I need to do combine the above Union query Customer Credit Transaction Final & ReceiptformQry.
The both query details:
Customer Credit Transaction Final SELECT BillBook1.TID, BillBook1.BILLNo, BillBook1.BILLDate, BillBook1.Customer, BillBook1.BillMode, [BillBook1 Vat Details].[TOTAL Rs] AS [CC Amount] FROM BillBook1 INNER JOIN [BillBook1 Vat Details] ON BillBook1.TID = [BillBook1 Vat Details].TID WHERE (((BillBook1.BillMode)="Credit")); UNION ALL
[code]...
Above fields are need to merge in Union query or otherwise. and remaining fields are needed to show separately.
it's possible to use a union query as a mail merge? I haven't found anything that says I can't do it, but I'm not getting my merge to complete, and when I switch to a plain query (and not changing anything else) my merge is successful, so I'm thinking there might be a limitation.
I have 3 queries that I need to join. the 3 queries work on their own. They are all similar to below
SELECT TOP 5 ASTDATA.[ID], ASTDATA.[Weight], ASTDATA.[StockCode], ASTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM ASTDATA ORDER BY Rnd([ID]);
But when I join them, like below, the data doesn't change. Does the rnd function work with a union query?
SELECT TOP 5 ASTDATA.[ID], ASTDATA.[Weight], ASTDATA.[StockCode], ASTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM ASTDATA UNION SELECT TOP 5 BSTDATA.[ID], BSTDATA.[Weight], BSTDATA.[StockCode], BSTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM BSTDATA UNION SELECT TOP 5 CSTDATA.[ID], CSTDATA.[Weight], CSTDATA.[StockCode], CSTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM CSTDATA
UNION Query will not execute properly. Remove "WHERE" statement query runs.The WHERE statement is used to locate all duplicate records, based on serial number, in a table. Also, it excludes certain data contained in two of the four tables. There are four separate queries for four separate tables. They all work until incorporated into a UNION QUERY.
Question, is there another way to structure the "WHERE" statement for this UNION Query and achieve the same results?
Code: Select DPTag from tbleqDP UNION ALL select ESGTag from tbleqESG
It is returning all the tags from both tables but putting them all under "DPTag." What I want is two columns in a report. One would have the header "DPTag" and all the values under it would be the tags from tbleqDP and the other would have the header "ESGTag" and all the values under it would be from the table tbleqESG.
What am I doing wrong such that it is returning all the values under the header DPTag?
Is there a way to hide a field in a union query? I need to keep the field in the SQL statement because I need to order by it. The field is "Rank," but I don't want it showing up.
I have a table with a field I want to update with the value of a Union Query
The field I want to update is Yes/No format and I can update using 0 or -1 OK.
However, when I link in the union query (and check that I only have 1 update result which is either 0 or -1) I get an error message saying that Operation must use an updatable query.
I guess this is referring to the Union Query (although I am trying to update the table and not the query.
In short - I want to update a table based on the value of a union query.
Code: UPDATE tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription INNER JOIN qry_QDF_QRYDEF1 ON (tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.EmailType = qry_QDF_QRYDEF1.Type) AND (tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.AgentEmail = qry_QDF_QRYDEF1.Email)
Code: SET tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.Subscribed = [Subscription];
I am using below Union Query to unpivot attached table. Basically this is a table with some clothes and their sizes (in yellow). Now my problem is that below query works well only when all sizes are in the same row but as per attachment I may have them potentially over three different rows.
I can determine which row is for which item based on size range column (in red) but I still do not know how to modify my query to look at different rows depending on value of size range column, especially that as you can see there are multiple values pointing out to the same size range i.e. 0-6 and 1-4 point out to Size Range 1.
Unfortunately I cannot change the layout of the table to have all sizes in one row
Code: Select Field1, Field2, "0" as Size,Field3 as Qty from orderform where Field3 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "1" as Size, Field4 as Qty from orderform where Field4 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "2" as Size, Field5 as Qty from orderform where Field5 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "3" as Size, Field6 as Qty from orderform where Field6 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "4" as Size, Field7 as Qty from orderform where Field7 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "5" as Size, Field8 as Qty from orderform where Field8 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "6" as Size, Field9 as Qty from orderform where Field9 > 0;
I have a union query with 2 fields: Order and Row_Heading_Full.
Code:
SELECT DummyClientType.Order, DummyClientType.Client_Type AS Row_Heading_Full FROM DummyClientType UNION SELECT ("25") AS [Order], ("Totals") AS Row_Heading_Full FROM DummyClientType;
The purpose is to pull the Order and Row_Heading_Full fields from a table and add another entry that with "25" as the Order and "Totals" as the Row_Heading_Full at the end of the list.
I want it to be ordered sequentially based on the Order field. But instead it is ordered like this: 1, 10, 11, 12... 20, 21, 22... 3, 4, 5... In other words it is ordering only by the first digit and not by the number as a whole.
When I remove the union aspect it is ordered properly:
Code:
SELECT DummyClientType.Order, DummyClientType.Client_Type AS Row_Heading_Full FROM DummyClientType;
But that defeats the purpose because I am not adding a final entry of "25" and "Totals".
I have a database that has over 20 tables in it and am using Access 2000. Unfortunately I cannot change the structure as it performs specific functions, so I am stuck with it.
I have created a Union Query from these tables yaking data from 5 fields using the Serial Number entered by the user.
SELECT[Workstation].UnitPart,PropertyTag,UnitSerial,Date,Technician FROM[Workstation] WHERE((([Workstation].UnitSerial)=[Enter Serial No.]; UNION SELECT[LAPTOP].UnitPart,PropertyTag,UnitSerial,Date,Technician
[Code] ....
I use a bar code scanner to scan the serial number, and it goes through the tables and returns the results along with the other specified fields.
I would like to scan up to 16 or more different serial numbers and have it return the results. Perhaps scan the first 16 serial numbers, then run the query? Is that possible. The serial numbers are unique and will return a combination of laptops, printers, monitors, etc...
I have created a report from the above union query and it works perfectly with only one serial number entered.
I have a Union Query (that works perfectly fine) with the following code:
Code: SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBattery UNION SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBeltsDeck; UNION SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBeltsHydro; UNION SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBeltsPTO; UNION SELECT * FROM sbqryUseFiltersAir UNION SELECT * FROM sbqryUseFiltersFuel UNION SELECT * FROM sbqryUseFiltersOil;
I am using this information on a Report.
The problem is that the Report shows the data in random order. Is there a way to filter either the Union Query or the Report?
I have a database that is used to create a data file for a customer. The database has two linked tables that are linked to tables that are both in another database (but within the same database as each other). Their structure is identical.I have a union query set up to combine both linked tables.
I am using a Macro to export that query but after running for a short while I get the error "The query cannot be completed. Either the size of the query set....."Does Access have a limitation on union query size? Combined, the tables are a lot of data but I'm confused as both the tables I'm combining are in the same database.
I am using the following UNION QUERY to total up equipment tested for a report.
SELECT "Laptops Tested" AS PCEQUIP, Count(*) AS RECORDS FROM [LAPTOPS] WHERE (((Date)Between [Enter Start Date] AND [Enter End Date])); UNION SELECT "Workstations Tested" AS PCEQUIP, Count(*) AS RECORDS FROM [WORKSTATION]
[code]...
I have created a report using ACCESS 2000 for this union query and it satisfies the requirement. I am trying to add the proper code and syntax in this query to total the number of all of this equipment tested.In this case the total would be 86. Is this possible?
I'm preparing a query as the control source for an unbound listbox. The following code gives the desired results:
Code: SELECT DISTINCT tblCameras.CameraNum, QrySbfShotList.CamerasFK FROM QrySbfShotList INNER JOIN tblCameras ON QrySbfShotList.CamerasFK = tblCameras.CamerasID WHERE (((QrySbfShotList.shootsFK)=[my].[control])) ORDER BY QrySbfShotList.CamerasFK
(My.control will be a control on the form. For the time being, I let the query prompt me for a value.)
It produces two columns like so:
CameraNum Camera ID 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 9 11 12
CameraNum is text; CameraID is numeric.
Now, I'm trying to use a trick I read about that should add a single textual entry to the top of the list like so:
Code: SELECT DISTINCT tblCameras.CameraNum, QrySbfShotList.CamerasFK FROM QrySbfShotList INNER JOIN tblCameras ON QrySbfShotList.CamerasFK = tblCameras.CamerasID WHERE (((QrySbfShotList.shootsFK)=[my].[control])) ORDER BY QrySbfShotList.CamerasFK
union
SELECT "(ALL)", "Dummy" FROM QrySbfShotList INNER JOIN tblCameras ON QrySbfShotList.CamerasFK = tblCameras.CamerasID WHERE (((QrySbfShotList.shootsFK)=[my].[control]));
This produces
CameraNum Camera ID ALL Dummy 1 2 11 12 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 8 9
The second (numeric) column is now out of order. This is reproducible for other values of my.control. If there are double digit entries they get inserted at the third row.
Why? What am I not understanding about how UNION works?
(BTW, I know I could put the "ALL" entry into tblCameras, thereby avoiding the need for a union, but I'd still like to know why the unexpected result.)
I'm new to Access. We have a database that was created years ago and has been working fine. Now suddendly we get the following error message on a query.
"The number of columns in the two selected tables or queries of a union query do not match"
This is the code
SELECT [TimeSheets All].[Job Number], [TimeSheets All].Date, [TimeSheets All].Details, [TimeSheets All].[Start Time], [TimeSheets All].[End Time], [TimeSheets All].[Unbillable hours], [TimeSheets All].Who, * FROM [TimeSheets All] WHERE ((([TimeSheets All].[Job Number]) Like [Forms]![Search]![Job Number])) ORDER BY [TimeSheets All].[Job Number], [TimeSheets All].Date;
I have two tables containing (let's say for simplicity) questions and attachments (pictures). I am trying to perform a union query to join all the questions and pictures into one report, but it won't let me union the attachment because 'the multi-valued field 'TableA.Pictures' cannot be used in a union query'.
I have searched and searched for a solution (and got kind of close) but i still can't get it to work. The best I can do is union everything like below, which gives all the questions as desired, but says #Error in the pictures column:
SELECT TableA.* FROM TableA Union SELECT TableB.* FROM TableB;
(Note tables A and B have the same structure, several yes/no and open text questions as well as one attachment field. )
