Queries :: Union Query Ruins Numbered Order?
Jan 19, 2015
I have a union query with 2 fields: Order and Row_Heading_Full.
Code:
SELECT DummyClientType.Order, DummyClientType.Client_Type AS Row_Heading_Full
FROM DummyClientType
UNION SELECT ("25") AS [Order], ("Totals") AS Row_Heading_Full
FROM DummyClientType;
The purpose is to pull the Order and Row_Heading_Full fields from a table and add another entry that with "25" as the Order and "Totals" as the Row_Heading_Full at the end of the list.
I want it to be ordered sequentially based on the Order field. But instead it is ordered like this: 1, 10, 11, 12... 20, 21, 22... 3, 4, 5... In other words it is ordering only by the first digit and not by the number as a whole.
When I remove the union aspect it is ordered properly:
Code:
SELECT DummyClientType.Order, DummyClientType.Client_Type AS Row_Heading_Full
FROM DummyClientType;
But that defeats the purpose because I am not adding a final entry of "25" and "Totals".
View Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 10, 2007
Hello all,
Does anyone know (and would be willing to share) how one can order the results of a Union query in Access by something other than the returned values?
I have a simple Union query that would work perfectly - if I could get the thing to order the results in a particular order everytime:mad:. The query returns counts (all from one table) of separate select statements that each meet certain conditions (e.g. having state=Nevada, having state=California, etc.) as records - but since Union queries in Access order results in ascending or descending order by returned value, it puts my records in a different order every time the record values change. I need to have them ordered the same way (in the same order as they appear in the Union query, if possible) everytime so that I can return those values to specific cells in MS Excel. Any suggestions would be much appreciated!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2013
I'm having a problem with a UNION / UNION ALL query.It seems there is a application crash fault when running the query that MS are aware of and have issued a hot fix. Unfortunately it will take my IT dept some time to check and install the hot fix If they agree to do it at all.
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: MSACCESS.EXE
Application Version: 12.0.6606.1000
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2006
I have a requirement to sort data of the following format by ref:
ref heading
------------------
1 Section
1.1 Test
1.2 Blah
1.3 Another
1.4 Things
1.4.1 Stuff
1.4.2 Other
...
10.1.1 Something
10.10.1 Else
10.2 Blah blah
2 Some other section
2.1 Another sub-section
...
As this data is stored as a string, a simple "ORDER BY Ref" will not deliver the desired effect, but rather will sort the data alphabetically (1, 10, 2, 20, 3 etc.).
Is anyone able to suggest appropriate SQL syntax or point to some VB/VBA logic to address this issue?
Thanks in advance,
Rob.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2014
I have some tables with identical field names, but the fields are in a different order. Is it possible to do a union like this, or do I have to rearrange the data within each table first?
For instance:
Table A: Field1, Field4, Field2, Field3
Table B: Field3, Field1, Field4, Field2
Table C: Field2, Field3, Field1, Field4
And I'm trying to combine those tables into TableABC: Field1, Field2, Field3, Field4.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2013
I am trying to create a named hierarchy based off a table from an Oil & Gas Program ARIES. The code below is as far as I could get:
Code:
SELECT dbo_AC_ECONOMIC.PROPNUM
, dbo_AC_ECONOMIC.SEQUENCE
, dbo_AC_ECONOMIC.SECTION
, dbo_AC_ECONOMIC.QUALIFIER
, dbo_AC_ECONOMIC.KEYWORD
, dbo_AC_ECONOMIC.EXPRESSION
, (SELECT COUNT(*)
[Code] ....
The results are as such:
PROPNUM...SECTION...SEQUENCE...QUALIFIER...KEYWORD ...EXPRESSION...TEST
TEST1.......4................1.................TAG .............GTC/GAS.......03.................1
TEST1.......4................2.................TAG ............."..................22................ ..1
TEST1.......4................3.................TAG ............."..................22................ ..2
TEST1.......4................4.................TAG .............SHRINK.........1...................1
TEST1.......5................1.................TAG .............ATX...............5.................. .1
TEST1.......5................2.................TAG .............ATX...............5.................. .2
TEST2.......4................1.................TAG .............GTC/GAS.......03.................1
TEST2.......4................2.................TAG ............."..................22................ ..1
The desired Results:
PROPNUM...SECTION...SEQUENCE...QUALIFIER...KEYWORD ...EXPRESSION...TEST...KEYWORD2
TEST1.......4................1.................TAG .............GTC/GAS.......03.................1........GTC/GAS_1
TEST1.......4................2.................TAG ............."..................22................ ..2........GTC/GAS_2
TEST1.......4................3.................TAG ............."..................22................ ..3........GTC/GAS_3
TEST1.......4................4.................TAG .............SHRINK........1...................1.. .......SHRINK_1
TEST1.......5................1.................TAG .............ATX..............5................... 1........ATX_1
TEST1.......5................2.................TAG .............ATX..............5................... 1........ATX_1
TEST2.......4................1.................TAG .............GTC/GAS.......03.................1........GTC/GAS_1
TEST2.......4................2.................TAG ............."..................22................ ..2........GTC/GAS_2
First I will give background on the table and fields. Then I will explain the overall goal for creating of the TEST and KEYWORD 2 fields.
BACKGROUND
PROPNUM: UNIQUE ID
SECTION: Set of data responsible for a certain function EX: section 4 - expenses, section 5 - interest, etc.
SEQUENCE: The order of the sytanx in that propnum's section
QUALIFIER: Qualifies multiples set of syntax per section to differentiate other work (NOT REALLY IMPORTANT for the query)
KEYWORD: A specific word that the program recognizes and treates the expression according to the key word * the quotes keyword is a continuation line and represent the keyword above it*
EXPRESSION: are the variables that are treated by program according to the keyword
OVERALL GOAL: The main goal is to have a spreadsheet of variables used by the program to calculate it's end result. Which means KEYWORD & EXPRESSION by PROPNUM. THE PROBLEM is that the only way to tell that a quote keyword belongs is by having the sequence and section lined up. So my solution is to rename the quote keyword with the primary keyword and a number.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2013
After putting in fields there were checkboxes into a Union Query, they now show up as -1s and 0s. Is a -1 a blank, and a 0 checked?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2013
I'm having a small problem where Access returns a "Query too complex" error when I try to run a Union query of the form:
Code:
SELECT CourseNumber, CourseTitle, [Date], TotalScore, "Two (2) zero visibility dives?" AS [Question], CountZeroVisibility AS [NegativeResponses]
FROM qryScore
UNION ALL
SELECT CourseNumber, CourseTitle, [Date], TotalScore, "One (1) night dive?" AS [Question], CountNightDive AS [NegativeResponses]
FROM qryScore
UNION ALL
...etc
With more than 13 unions.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2014
I have two basic lists of employee names, ID's, phone numbers etc, with one field containing an attachment with a picture of their ID. I don't want to permanently combine these two lists of employees, as they work in different departments, but for certain events I need to be able to print a report with a list of all their names, ID numbers, and corresponding ID photos.
I tried to make a UNION query, but can't do it with the attachment field. If I leave that field out, it's no problem. To simplify, I have been doing a test run as follows, with just the name field and photo field (field 1).
SELECT [Starting Gate employees].[Employee name], [Starting Gate employees].Field2
FROM [Starting Gate employees]
UNION
SELECT [Farrier employees].[Employee name], [Farrier employees].Field2
FROM [Farrier employees];
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2013
I have a Union Query which the result was like this:
Date Cash_In Cash_Out
08/06/2013 100.00
08/06/2013 25.00
08/06/2013 50.00
08/06/2013 20.00
Note: The Date Field comes from two different tables. Original field names are Cash_In_Date and Cash_Out_Date.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2015
I have three queries that make a training list based on a person's role, team, and ad-hoc exceptions. The personnelID field is filtered by a listbox on a form. Each of these work great on their own (nice!). Now I want to combine them. I made the below union query that works... however when it is run, I am prompted to enter the personnelID again. This prompt only happens once. Do I need to incorporate a qhere statement somewhere, even though each of the individual queries have them already?
SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID
FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByRole
UNION ALL
SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID
FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByTeam
UNION ALL SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID
FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByAdHocPersonnel;
The where statement of potential use:
Code:
WHERE (((tblPersonnel.PersonnelID)=[Forms]![frmMain]![lbxPersonnel]));
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2014
Im trying to join two queries as I am unable to use just a single query but I cant use a union query as the query fields aren't exactly the same.
Both queries have a PO_Detail field as every PO has a PO_Detail number assigned to it. 3 of the same records are in both query results but one query is missing the other two results.
If I create a join between the two queries based on this field I don't get all the results. Unfortunately I cant upload the database as it has sensitive data which would take me ages to clear out but I can show a picture of the results.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2013
Am trying many times in UNION query but its not working because there is different field names and only some fields are matched. So I need to both query's are combine in 1 query.
They Quays details:
1.Customer Credit Transaction1
2.Customer Credit Transaction2
Above both queries are already combined in UNION query as (Customer Credit Transaction Final) its not a problem.So now I need to do combine the above Union query Customer Credit Transaction Final & ReceiptformQry.
The both query details:
Customer Credit Transaction Final
SELECT BillBook1.TID, BillBook1.BILLNo, BillBook1.BILLDate, BillBook1.Customer, BillBook1.BillMode, [BillBook1 Vat Details].[TOTAL Rs] AS [CC Amount]
FROM BillBook1 INNER JOIN [BillBook1 Vat Details] ON BillBook1.TID = [BillBook1 Vat Details].TID
WHERE (((BillBook1.BillMode)="Credit"));
UNION ALL
[code]...
Above fields are need to merge in Union query or otherwise. and remaining fields are needed to show separately.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2015
it's possible to use a union query as a mail merge? I haven't found anything that says I can't do it, but I'm not getting my merge to complete, and when I switch to a plain query (and not changing anything else) my merge is successful, so I'm thinking there might be a limitation.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2013
I have 3 queries that I need to join. the 3 queries work on their own. They are all similar to below
SELECT TOP 5 ASTDATA.[ID], ASTDATA.[Weight], ASTDATA.[StockCode], ASTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1
FROM ASTDATA
ORDER BY Rnd([ID]);
But when I join them, like below, the data doesn't change. Does the rnd function work with a union query?
SELECT TOP 5 ASTDATA.[ID], ASTDATA.[Weight], ASTDATA.[StockCode], ASTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1
FROM ASTDATA
UNION
SELECT TOP 5 BSTDATA.[ID], BSTDATA.[Weight], BSTDATA.[StockCode], BSTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1
FROM BSTDATA
UNION SELECT TOP 5 CSTDATA.[ID], CSTDATA.[Weight], CSTDATA.[StockCode], CSTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1
FROM CSTDATA
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2015
UNION Query will not execute properly. Remove "WHERE" statement query runs.The WHERE statement is used to locate all duplicate records, based on serial number, in a table. Also, it excludes certain data contained in two of the four tables. There are four separate queries for four separate tables. They all work until incorporated into a UNION QUERY.
Question, is there another way to structure the "WHERE" statement for this UNION Query and achieve the same results?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2014
I have a simple union query that looks like this:
Code:
Select DPTag from tbleqDP UNION ALL select ESGTag from tbleqESG
It is returning all the tags from both tables but putting them all under "DPTag." What I want is two columns in a report. One would have the header "DPTag" and all the values under it would be the tags from tbleqDP and the other would have the header "ESGTag" and all the values under it would be from the table tbleqESG.
What am I doing wrong such that it is returning all the values under the header DPTag?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2013
Is there a way to hide a field in a union query? I need to keep the field in the SQL statement because I need to order by it. The field is "Rank," but I don't want it showing up.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2014
I have unified three queries , each query has a field "date",
format is dd/mm/yyyy.
The Union select query however, displays this "date" with different format , dd/mmm/yy
How can I fetch same format in the union query ??
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2013
I have a table with a field I want to update with the value of a Union Query
The field I want to update is Yes/No format and I can update using 0 or -1 OK.
However, when I link in the union query (and check that I only have 1 update result which is either 0 or -1) I get an error message saying that Operation must use an updatable query.
I guess this is referring to the Union Query (although I am trying to update the table and not the query.
In short - I want to update a table based on the value of a union query.
Code:
UPDATE tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription INNER JOIN qry_QDF_QRYDEF1 ON (tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.EmailType = qry_QDF_QRYDEF1.Type) AND (tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.AgentEmail = qry_QDF_QRYDEF1.Email)
Code:
SET tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.Subscribed = [Subscription];
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 25, 2013
How can I add the resulting records from a union query. The results of the union are something like this:
Quantity Item
2 Cats
3 Cats
1 Dog
4 Mice
What I need to display is
Quantity Item
5 Cats
1 Dog
4 Mice
How can I get the query to "do the math"?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2014
I am using below Union Query to unpivot attached table. Basically this is a table with some clothes and their sizes (in yellow). Now my problem is that below query works well only when all sizes are in the same row but as per attachment I may have them potentially over three different rows.
I can determine which row is for which item based on size range column (in red) but I still do not know how to modify my query to look at different rows depending on value of size range column, especially that as you can see there are multiple values pointing out to the same size range i.e. 0-6 and 1-4 point out to Size Range 1.
Unfortunately I cannot change the layout of the table to have all sizes in one row
Code:
Select Field1, Field2, "0" as Size,Field3 as Qty from orderform where Field3 > 0;
Union All Select Field1, Field2, "1" as Size, Field4 as Qty from orderform where Field4 > 0;
Union All Select Field1, Field2, "2" as Size, Field5 as Qty from orderform where Field5 > 0;
Union All Select Field1, Field2, "3" as Size, Field6 as Qty from orderform where Field6 > 0;
Union All Select Field1, Field2, "4" as Size, Field7 as Qty from orderform where Field7 > 0;
Union All Select Field1, Field2, "5" as Size, Field8 as Qty from orderform where Field8 > 0;
Union All Select Field1, Field2, "6" as Size, Field9 as Qty from orderform where Field9 > 0;
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2014
I have a database that has over 20 tables in it and am using Access 2000. Unfortunately I cannot change the structure as it performs specific functions, so I am stuck with it.
I have created a Union Query from these tables yaking data from 5 fields using the Serial Number entered by the user.
SELECT[Workstation].UnitPart,PropertyTag,UnitSerial,Date,Technician
FROM[Workstation]
WHERE((([Workstation].UnitSerial)=[Enter Serial No.];
UNION
SELECT[LAPTOP].UnitPart,PropertyTag,UnitSerial,Date,Technician
[Code] ....
I use a bar code scanner to scan the serial number, and it goes through the tables and returns the results along with the other specified fields.
I would like to scan up to 16 or more different serial numbers and have it return the results. Perhaps scan the first 16 serial numbers, then run the query? Is that possible. The serial numbers are unique and will return a combination of laptops, printers, monitors, etc...
I have created a report from the above union query and it works perfectly with only one serial number entered.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Oct 1, 2013
I have a Union Query (that works perfectly fine) with the following code:
Code:
SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBattery
UNION
SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBeltsDeck;
UNION
SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBeltsHydro;
UNION
SELECT * FROM sbqryUseBeltsPTO;
UNION
SELECT * FROM sbqryUseFiltersAir
UNION
SELECT * FROM sbqryUseFiltersFuel
UNION SELECT * FROM sbqryUseFiltersOil;
I am using this information on a Report.
The problem is that the Report shows the data in random order. Is there a way to filter either the Union Query or the Report?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2014
I have a database that is used to create a data file for a customer. The database has two linked tables that are linked to tables that are both in another database (but within the same database as each other). Their structure is identical.I have a union query set up to combine both linked tables.
I am using a Macro to export that query but after running for a short while I get the error "The query cannot be completed. Either the size of the query set....."Does Access have a limitation on union query size? Combined, the tables are a lot of data but I'm confused as both the tables I'm combining are in the same database.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2014
I am using the following UNION QUERY to total up equipment tested for a report.
SELECT "Laptops Tested" AS PCEQUIP, Count(*) AS RECORDS
FROM [LAPTOPS]
WHERE (((Date)Between [Enter Start Date] AND [Enter End Date]));
UNION
SELECT "Workstations Tested" AS PCEQUIP, Count(*) AS RECORDS
FROM [WORKSTATION]
[code]...
I have created a report using ACCESS 2000 for this union query and it satisfies the requirement. I am trying to add the proper code and syntax in this query to total the number of all of this equipment tested.In this case the total would be 86. Is this possible?
View 2 Replies
View Related
