I have a table with the following
Code:
fname,lname,location1,location2
-------------------------------
john, doe, dublin, null
john, doe, null, galway
and i wish to consolidate it to show like
Code:
fname,lname,location1,location2
-------------------------------
john, doe, dublin, galway.
I could do it by creating a new table, then merging, but its cumbersome.
I have a table that contains specific customer transaction data. In this table there are the following fields:
Document
Vendor
Vendor Name
Units
Value
There are instances in which multiple records could exist for one document number. Such as:
Document-----Vendor-------Vendor Name------Units------Value--------
12345678------AAAA--------ABC Co.-------100------200.00
12345678------BBBB---------BBC Co.--------25-------50.00
12345678------CCCC----------CCC Co.--------10-------20.00
What I am attempting to do is, sum the units & value fields and report the data on one line with the vendor record with the > unit count. So, for the example above, the data returned would be:
Document-----Vendor-------Vendor Name------Units------Value--------
12345678------AAAA--------ABC Co.-------135------270.00
Can this be performed in one single query vs multiple queries. If so, any guidance would be welcomed.
Thx
In Access 2010, I have a table with two fields. The first field (Investor Name) contains several occurrences of the same text (i.e. Investor A occurs 2 times, Investor B occurs 3 times, etc.). The second field (Investment) may or may not contain duplicates (i.e. more than one Investor may have invested in the same Investment). I'm trying to create a query that will show me, in one record, all the Investments that each Investor has made.
So for the following data...
Investor Name
Investment
Investor A
Investment 1
Investor A
Investment 2
Investor B
Investment 1
Investor B
Investment 3
Investor B
Investment 4
I want the query to report back the following...
Investor Name
1st Investment
2nd Investment
3rd Investment
Investor A
Investment 1
Investment 2
Investor B
Investment 1
Investment 3
Investment 4
To clarify further, I'm NOT looking to concatenate the results into one field. Instead, I want each Investment to appear in its own field, so that I can pull each one into a report later. Ideally, there should be no limit to the number of Investments that each Investor has made, although practically speaking, it likely won't exceed 10 or so.
I couldn't find a similar question already answered, so here it goes. I have multiple tables used to store information on different research materials:
table Books:
- BookID
- Author
- Title
- Year
- Cabinet
table Papers:
- PaperId
- Author
- Title
- Year
- Cabinet
table Catalog:
- CatalogID
- Author
- Title
- Year
- Cabinet
And I have a query for each of those tables that helps me find information. What I'm trying to do is to consolidate the result of those individual queries into one single query that later I can insert into a form to display a search result.
So the resulting query would look like:
Type.....ID....Author.....Title....Year....Cabinet
Book.....001...John.....Good book....2005....C01
Book....002.....Mary....Other book...2006...C01
Paper....001....Albert...PaperABC....1987....C01
Paper...002....John.....PaperXYZ.....2006....C02
Catalog...001...Mark....Cat00A....1989.....C02
Catalog...002...Bill......Cat00B.....2004.....C03
etc.
Is this possible?
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks.
Daniel
What I have is a database setup with multiple tables in which different areas of my DC can input information simultaneously into their respective tables. I then have another database linked to it for myself to have a live view of each updated record. I would like to see all the records of each table in 1 single table (possibly just sorted ascending by time). Each table has the same Field headings but may have different qtys of records. As I will then have it linked to an Excel table to VLOOKUP from it.
I have tried Union coding but always get Syntax Error etc.
I am looking for a query that will return records from a table that have related records in another table. Opposite to the Unmatched Query Wizard.I have two tables: tblSupplier and tblSupplierProducts.The two tables are related by the field "SupplierId".I need the query to only return Suppliers that have Products.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a survey database that I've been using for the last year for monthly auditing of employees files. I need to be able to get monthly audit scores for each employee but grouped by their manager. The problem I'm having is employees have moved between managers throughout the year, so employees that are listed under Manager 2 now were actually working for Manager 1 when the audits occurred.
ie. Audits occurred Jan - April for Employee 1 while they were assigned to Manager 1. Employee 1 moved to Manager 2s team in May. So when running monthly reports for the year Employee 1 audits should fall under Manager 1 for Jan-April and Manager 2 for May-Dec.
I do have a history table set up like:
tblEmployeeHistory
ID (PK)
EmployeeID (FK to Employee table)
ManagerID (FK to Manager table)
MoveDate (date employee assigned to manager)
The Employee table is set up like:
Employee ID (PK)
EmployeeName
ManagerID (FK to Manager table)
The Manager table has the ManagerID and ManagerName.
That's the employee side of things; then I have the tables that store the audit results:
tblAudit
AuditID
FileNumber
AuditDate
EmployeeID (FK to employee table)
tblAuditResults
AuditID; QstnID (Composite PK, QstnID is FK to tblQuestions)
Answer
How can I use AuditDate and MoveDate to relate audits to the managers the employees were under when the audits occurred?
hi,
I have a database that includes 5 uploads of GL data - once in access I want to consolidate these into one table in order to query. All headings are the same (the reason for the five uploads is restricted amount of lines that can be downloaded in Excel).
Can anyone tell me how i do this?
rgds
jim
I have a table where there are one person can have multiple records. I
would like to consolidate the each clients records to one field with
an additional field showing the total of all the clients invoices. Is
that possible?
Sample:
Invoice# Client invoice_amt
12345 X $5
45767 X $8
89787 X $6
My desired result
Client invoice_total
X $19
Is this possible?
I'm using an UPDATE query to update records in one table (tblMain) from another table (tblTemp)
Here is my SQL :
Quote:
UPDATE [tblMain]
INNER JOIN [tblTemp] ON [tblMain].[MainField1] = [tblTemp].[TempField1]
SET [tblMain].[MainField2] = [tblTemp].[TempField2];
I only want to update the records in tblMain which have a corresponding record in tblTemp (linked by MainField1 / TempField1)
If any record doesn't appear in tblTemp, I want tblMain to retain the existing value for that record.
However, it appears that in such situations, the record in tblMain has it's MainField2 value set to null / ZLS.
I've tried using LEFT JOIN and RIGHT JOIN and also tried WHERE clauses but the result is the same every time.
I've got a table which lists accounts with an associated charge. If the account has multiple charges, then the account appears multiple times, for each charge. I'd like to consolidate the duplicates without losing each charge that is associated with the account.
View 4 Replies View Relatedtbl_A has column "ID" with duplicates. tbl_B has column "ID" with distinct values.i want to find all the distinct IDs in tbl_A that are present in tbl_B.I've tried the following with no luck:
SELECT DISTINCT tbl_A.ID
FROM tbl_A LEFT JOIN tbl_B ON tbl_A.ID = tbl_B.ID
WHERE tbl_A.ID IN tbl_B.ID;
I have an Access 2007 application that has a Parts Table that contains a list of automotive parts.I have attached a screen shot (parts.jpg) showing the structure.I have another table called Web_Parts that has exactly the same structure as Parts. The Web_Parts table gets its data from a CSV import that I do that is data extracted from an MySQL database used by an eCommerce website.
You will notice that there is a field called "Web_Product_Id" (number). This is the unique ID for each of the products that I have exported from the Web shop system. I need to regularly (probably every couple of weeks), export out of the web shop system and import into the Access environment.
Due to the fact that the data in the web shop system may change (pricing, description, add new items, delete new items etc), I need to find a way that I can simply update any existing records in the Parts table with any new information contained in the Web_Parts table......
I have a table which lists amendments (amendments history file) which need to take effect of another table (M0070), I can select the records fine and so the sub query looks to be okay but I'm missing something (probably obvious) in the deletion query where by it does only delete the records selected but everything (I know that the asterisk is wrong in the code below but I'm not sure what to replace it with).
At this point I'm trying to delete all records for a specific employee on a specific contract (they can be 1 or more employee records for that individual on a contract - and they could exist on multiple contracts).
DELETE *
FROM M0070
WHERE EXISTS
(SELECT M0070.[Contract No], M0070.[Contract Name], M0070.[Employee No], M0070.Forename, M0070.Surname, M0070.Branch, M0070.[Long Desc], M0070.[Emp Post Start Date], M0070.[Days per week],
[Code] .....
I have a database with customers/orders etc. I need to create a form or something which will show if a duplicate customer is entered. I know about the duplicate records query wizard, but I also need an easy way to consolidate and delete records. When a duplicate customer is found, move the customers order/s [OrderNumber] to the existing customer and delete the new/latest customer record.
Customers are in tblCustomers, their orders are in tblCustomerOrders, [CustomerNumber] is the joining field.
I was thinking of just a date/time field for [DateCustomerEntered] with default value Now to keep track of the later customers?
delete Query How do i Specify the table containing the records that I want to delete?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two tables as follows;
Master file:Vessel_master
Vessel_code
Vessel_name
main data table:Main
Vessel_code
container_no
size
Voyage
weight
by using above two table have made a query as follows;
Vessel_name:Vessel_master
Vessel_code:Main
container_no:Main
size:Main
Voyage:Main
weight:Main
Have joined "vessel_code" fields of the both tables by join type 2.
by using the query as data source made a form to edit/update/delete data. the problem is, when delete a record by using the form, it will delete the related data in the master file as well, which i do not want.
I have a table that includes a date/time field. I want to query that table and show all but the TOP N records. Since the number of records will always be changing I cant do it using the BOTTOM N records.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've got 2 tables, same structure, one [T-temp-Target] holds number of training units split by module a trainee needs to finish the course, the other [T-temp-Actual] holds what they've completed so far.
Both tables have structure
TRAINEEID
MODCODE
CountOfUnits
I'm trying to find the modules that they've not done yet so I can add up the units for them, only modules that have been started are recorded in the table of what they've done [T-temp-Actual], modules they haven't started yet aren't included in it. Here's the SQL
Code:
SELECT
[T-temp-Target].TRAINEEID,
[T-temp-Target].MODCODE,
[T-temp-Actual].MODCODE
FROM [T-temp-Actual] INNER JOIN [T-temp-Target] ON
([T-temp-Actual].TRAINEEID = [T-temp-Target].TRAINEEID) AND
([T-temp-Actual].MODCODE = [T-temp-Target].MODCODE)
WHERE ((([T-temp-Actual].MODCODE) Is Null));
I am working with access 2010 and I have a database that has attachments in the table. I have set up a query to in by database but every time I have a record with 2 or more attachments on it it shows that record as two different records in my query. I am wondering if there is a way I can make the query show one record and to be able to view attachments like in the original table.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm using Access 2007.I have 2 tables that are identical in structure.The tables are called [Workorder Parts] and [Workorder Parts Temp]. They both have the same structure:
WorkOrderPartID (Autonumber)
WorkorderID(Number)
PartID(Number)
Quantity(Number)
UnitPrice(Currency)
Notes(Memo)
KitID(Number).
[Workorder Parts] has 128 records in in and [Workorder Parts Temp] has 28 records in it that are a small subset of [Workorder Parts] therefore, the contents of the key field column in [Workorder Parts Temp] is the same as in [Workorder Parts].I tried the following SQL but get an error message saying "Cannot Update "WorkOrderPartID" Field not updateable":
DoCmd.RunSQL "INSERT INTO [WorkOrder Parts] SELECT * FROM [Workorder Parts Temp]"
My aim is that I want all of the records from [Workorder Parts Temp]to be copied to [Workorder Parts] and have their "WorkOrderPartID" fields correctly updated with a new value...
I have a table which has duplicate records so I want to write down the query that will remove the duplicate records from the table.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm using Access 2007.
I have a button on a form that when clicked, does the following:
I have a table called [Workorder Parts] that has 128 records in it with Fields named WorkOrderPartID (Autonumber), WorkorderID(Number), PartID(Number), Quantity(Number), UnitPrice(Currency), Notes(Memo), KitID(Number).
I want to copy records into another table called [tKitsWorkorderParts] that has the identical structure based upon a value in the field WorkorderID. For testing purposes let's assume that the field contains the value "12". There are 28 records in the table that have the value set to "12"
If I hardcode the value "12" into the following SQL statement, it finds and copies the 28 records correctly.
DoCmd.RunSQL "INSERT INTO [tKitsWorkOrderParts] SELECT * FROM [WorkOrder Parts] WHERE [WorkOrder Parts.WorkOrderID] = 12"
so far so good.....
Now, on the form there is a Text Box called WorkorderID that contains the value "12".
If I change the code to the following, I get all 128 records instead of just the 28 I am expecting:
DoCmd.RunSQL "INSERT INTO [tKitsWorkOrderParts] SELECT * FROM [WorkOrder Parts] WHERE [WorkOrder Parts.WorkOrderID] = WorkorderID"
I have inserted a few MsgBox displays to display the value contained in WorkorderID and it shows "12"...
What am I doing wrong???
I have a file that I want to import on a daily basis and append to an existing table in my database. The date changes each day. I want to create a query that checks to see if the date (of the first record) already exists before I import and append the new file. If it does, I want to show a message saying something to the effect of "This file has already been imported".
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow can I combine several records in a table into one record?
Suppose that I have a table like Table1 in the attached image.
Then I want to combine all records with the same value for Key1 in one record.
The result is shown in Table2 in the attached image.
I would prefer to do it using SQL only, but I guess that this is not possible. Is it possible?
Alternatively I could accept to turn to VBA that could do it. Any good links about this?
I'm trying to do a query to count corresponding records in another table. It works except for returning zeros. I've tried using NZ and switching the type of join, but to no avail.
Here's what I have:
Query A has 3 columns (FU kids)
AlphaID
DtcCtr (a Location Code)
DlsDtc (a Date of change)
Table A has many columns, but I'm only using a few. (dbo_MNCPSTNote)
AlphaID
DtcCtr (the same Location Code)
ServDate (the date I'm trying to count)
Here's what I have:
SELECT [FU kids].AlphaID, [FU kids].DtcCtr, Count(dbo_MNCPSTNote.ServDate) AS CountOfServDate
FROM dbo_MNCPSTNote RIGHT JOIN [FU kids] ON dbo_MNCPSTNote.AlphaID = [FU kids].AlphaID
WHERE (((dbo_MNCPSTNote.Center)=[FU kids]![DtcCtr])) OR (((dbo_MNCPSTNote.ServDate)>[FU kids]![DlsDtc]))
GROUP BY [FU kids].AlphaID, [FU kids].DtcCtr;
I want to know the count, including zero, of the number of records based on ServDate for each AlphaID in Query A.
I didn't create the tables and have no control over how they are designed/organized.