I have three queries that make a training list based on a person's role, team, and ad-hoc exceptions. The personnelID field is filtered by a listbox on a form. Each of these work great on their own (nice!). Now I want to combine them. I made the below union query that works... however when it is run, I am prompted to enter the personnelID again. This prompt only happens once. Do I need to incorporate a qhere statement somewhere, even though each of the individual queries have them already?
SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID
FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByRole
UNION ALL
SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID
FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByTeam
UNION ALL SELECT First_Name, Last_Name, TrainingTitle, PersonnelID
FROM qryPersonnelTrainingByAdHocPersonnel;
The where statement of potential use:
Code:
WHERE (((tblPersonnel.PersonnelID)=[Forms]![frmMain]![lbxPersonnel]));
Am trying many times in UNION query but its not working because there is different field names and only some fields are matched. So I need to both query's are combine in 1 query.
Above both queries are already combined in UNION query as (Customer Credit Transaction Final) its not a problem.So now I need to do combine the above Union query Customer Credit Transaction Final & ReceiptformQry.
The both query details:
Customer Credit Transaction Final SELECT BillBook1.TID, BillBook1.BILLNo, BillBook1.BILLDate, BillBook1.Customer, BillBook1.BillMode, [BillBook1 Vat Details].[TOTAL Rs] AS [CC Amount] FROM BillBook1 INNER JOIN [BillBook1 Vat Details] ON BillBook1.TID = [BillBook1 Vat Details].TID WHERE (((BillBook1.BillMode)="Credit")); UNION ALL
[code]...
Above fields are need to merge in Union query or otherwise. and remaining fields are needed to show separately.
I'm having a problem with a UNION / UNION ALL query.It seems there is a application crash fault when running the query that MS are aware of and have issued a hot fix. Unfortunately it will take my IT dept some time to check and install the hot fix If they agree to do it at all.
Problem signature: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: MSACCESS.EXE Application Version: 12.0.6606.1000
i I have two queries.. What i'm hoping is to combine the result into one query but not in one column only but instead the result of the second query should be beside the first query.. The result of the second query should be added as a new column.
First Query
SELECT tbl_uSers.UserName, Count(tbl_rEceived_eMail.EntryID) AS eMailReceived FROM tbl_rEceived_eMail INNER JOIN tbl_uSers ON tbl_rEceived_eMail.UseriD = tbl_uSers.UseriD GROUP BY tbl_uSers.UserName;
Second Query
SELECT tbl_uSers.UserName, Count(tbl_rEceived_eMail.EntryID) AS eMailProcessed FROM tbl_rEceived_eMail INNER JOIN tbl_uSers ON tbl_rEceived_eMail.UseriD = tbl_uSers.UseriD GROUP BY tbl_uSers.UserName, tbl_rEceived_eMail.ProcessedYN HAVING (((tbl_rEceived_eMail.ProcessedYN)="Y"));
Can anyone help me with how I can accomplish this?
Here is what I currently have:
10 SQL Pass-through queries to update different Date field (Date1, Date2, Date3, etc.) based on the value of the next date field.
This is how each individual query is set up (there are 10 in total) UPDATE tblApplications SET tblApplications.LastContact = [date1] WHERE (((tblApplications.Date2) Is Null) AND ((tblApplications.[Date Completed]) Is Null));
Here is what I would like to have: (as 1 query)
UPDATE tblApplications SET tblApplications.LastContact = [date1] WHERE (((tblApplications.Date2) Is Null) AND ((tblApplications.[Date Completed]) Is Null));
UPDATE tblApplications SET tblApplications.LastContact = [date2] WHERE (((tblApplications.Date1) Is Not Null) AND ((tblApplications.Date2) Is Not Null) AND ((tblApplications.Date3) Is Null) AND ((tblApplications.[Date Completed]) Is Null));
UPDATE tblApplications SET tblApplications.LastContact = [date3] WHERE (((tblApplications.[Date Completed]) Is Null) AND ((tblApplications.Date1) Is Not Null) AND ((tblApplications.Date2) Is Not Null) AND ((tblApplications.Date3) Is Not Null) AND ((tblApplications.Date4) Is Null));
Can I somehow combine them together like this or do I have to keep them as 10 seperate queries?
I have multiple databases (one for each department). All 4 databases have an Agents table (tblAgents). Now I am creating another database that uses all of the agents on site. What I want to do is link all the agents tables and combine the values in one query.
The tables are linked to my new database. So logically, I'd think my next step is to query the tables. This is where I'm stuck. How do I say:
Agent = tblAgentsDepartment1.AgentName and also tblAgentsDepartment2.AgentName and also tblAgentsDepartment3.AgentName and also tblAgentsDepartment4.AgentName?
I'm having a small problem where Access returns a "Query too complex" error when I try to run a Union query of the form:
Code: SELECT CourseNumber, CourseTitle, [Date], TotalScore, "Two (2) zero visibility dives?" AS [Question], CountZeroVisibility AS [NegativeResponses] FROM qryScore UNION ALL SELECT CourseNumber, CourseTitle, [Date], TotalScore, "One (1) night dive?" AS [Question], CountNightDive AS [NegativeResponses] FROM qryScore UNION ALL ...etc
I have two basic lists of employee names, ID's, phone numbers etc, with one field containing an attachment with a picture of their ID. I don't want to permanently combine these two lists of employees, as they work in different departments, but for certain events I need to be able to print a report with a list of all their names, ID numbers, and corresponding ID photos.
I tried to make a UNION query, but can't do it with the attachment field. If I leave that field out, it's no problem. To simplify, I have been doing a test run as follows, with just the name field and photo field (field 1).
SELECT [Starting Gate employees].[Employee name], [Starting Gate employees].Field2 FROM [Starting Gate employees] UNION SELECT [Farrier employees].[Employee name], [Farrier employees].Field2 FROM [Farrier employees];
Im trying to join two queries as I am unable to use just a single query but I cant use a union query as the query fields aren't exactly the same.
Both queries have a PO_Detail field as every PO has a PO_Detail number assigned to it. 3 of the same records are in both query results but one query is missing the other two results.
If I create a join between the two queries based on this field I don't get all the results. Unfortunately I cant upload the database as it has sensitive data which would take me ages to clear out but I can show a picture of the results.
Code: SELECT Sum(Tab1.Inputs) AS SumOfInputs, Sum(Tab1.ValInp) AS SumOfValInp, Sum(Tab1.Outputs) AS SumOfOutputs, Sum(Tab1.ValOut) AS SumOfValOut, Products.Product, Products.VAT, Products.UM FROM Tab1 INNER JOIN Produse ON Tab1.ProductID = Products.ProductID GROUP BY Products.Product, Products.VAT, Product.UM, Tab1.ProductID;
Second query :
Code: SELECT Nz([SumOfInputs],0)-Nz([SumOfOutputs],0) AS Stoc, Nz([SumOfValInp],0)-Nz([SumOfValOut],0) AS ValStoc, IIf([Stoc]=0,0,([ValStoc]/[Stoc])) AS CMP, [Sum Products].Product, [Sum Products].SumOfInputs, [Sum Products].SumOfOutputs, [Sum Products].SumOfValInp, [Sum Products].SumOfValOut, [Sum Products].VAT, [Sum Products].UM FROM [Sum Products] GROUP BY [Sum Products].Product, [Sum Products].SumOfInputs, [Sum Products].SumOfOutputs, [Sum Products].SumOfValInp, [Sum Products].SumOfValOut, [Sum Products].VAT, [Sum Products].UM HAVING (((Nz([SumOfInputs],0)-Nz([SumOfOutputs],0))>0.09 Or (Nz([SumOfInputs],0)-Nz([SumOfOutputs],0))<-0.09));
I need to combine those two query sql code to make only one query.
i intially, I wish to have attendance stats for 3 groups of people over 2 days in a report
i have the two queries for the raw data, but wish to combine into a report that will ultimately become a "dashboard" report for half a dozen queries., and can only get one or the other to work do i need to combine the queries into a summary query of sorts?
I get tasked to use access very infrequently but now I have been asked to create a database. I am struggling with combining 2 tables. I have different data on each table however I do have a unique Identifier. So on table 1 I have Bud, his height, weight, etc. On table 2 I have Bud his home address, phone #, etc. I am using name "Bud" in this case as my unique identifier. I want to create a query that gives me Bud, his height, phone # etc. I want my query to pull in all records. Bud may only have info on table 1 and Budette could be on table 2 but not on table 1. I would like my query to include all the unique identifiers and as much info as I have in the tables.
Because I have more than 3 queries, it is really hard for me to manage. Therefore, I was thinking of having 3 crosstab queries to show in one single query. This way it will save my time from moving back and forth.
it's possible to use a union query as a mail merge? I haven't found anything that says I can't do it, but I'm not getting my merge to complete, and when I switch to a plain query (and not changing anything else) my merge is successful, so I'm thinking there might be a limitation.
I have 3 queries that I need to join. the 3 queries work on their own. They are all similar to below
SELECT TOP 5 ASTDATA.[ID], ASTDATA.[Weight], ASTDATA.[StockCode], ASTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM ASTDATA ORDER BY Rnd([ID]);
But when I join them, like below, the data doesn't change. Does the rnd function work with a union query?
SELECT TOP 5 ASTDATA.[ID], ASTDATA.[Weight], ASTDATA.[StockCode], ASTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM ASTDATA UNION SELECT TOP 5 BSTDATA.[ID], BSTDATA.[Weight], BSTDATA.[StockCode], BSTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM BSTDATA UNION SELECT TOP 5 CSTDATA.[ID], CSTDATA.[Weight], CSTDATA.[StockCode], CSTDATA.[CurrentQty], Rnd([ID]) AS Expr1 FROM CSTDATA
UNION Query will not execute properly. Remove "WHERE" statement query runs.The WHERE statement is used to locate all duplicate records, based on serial number, in a table. Also, it excludes certain data contained in two of the four tables. There are four separate queries for four separate tables. They all work until incorporated into a UNION QUERY.
Question, is there another way to structure the "WHERE" statement for this UNION Query and achieve the same results?
Code: Select DPTag from tbleqDP UNION ALL select ESGTag from tbleqESG
It is returning all the tags from both tables but putting them all under "DPTag." What I want is two columns in a report. One would have the header "DPTag" and all the values under it would be the tags from tbleqDP and the other would have the header "ESGTag" and all the values under it would be from the table tbleqESG.
What am I doing wrong such that it is returning all the values under the header DPTag?
Is there a way to hide a field in a union query? I need to keep the field in the SQL statement because I need to order by it. The field is "Rank," but I don't want it showing up.
I have a table with a field I want to update with the value of a Union Query
The field I want to update is Yes/No format and I can update using 0 or -1 OK.
However, when I link in the union query (and check that I only have 1 update result which is either 0 or -1) I get an error message saying that Operation must use an updatable query.
I guess this is referring to the Union Query (although I am trying to update the table and not the query.
In short - I want to update a table based on the value of a union query.
Code: UPDATE tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription INNER JOIN qry_QDF_QRYDEF1 ON (tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.EmailType = qry_QDF_QRYDEF1.Type) AND (tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.AgentEmail = qry_QDF_QRYDEF1.Email)
Code: SET tbl_StaMe_NGR_Subscription.Subscribed = [Subscription];
I am using below Union Query to unpivot attached table. Basically this is a table with some clothes and their sizes (in yellow). Now my problem is that below query works well only when all sizes are in the same row but as per attachment I may have them potentially over three different rows.
I can determine which row is for which item based on size range column (in red) but I still do not know how to modify my query to look at different rows depending on value of size range column, especially that as you can see there are multiple values pointing out to the same size range i.e. 0-6 and 1-4 point out to Size Range 1.
Unfortunately I cannot change the layout of the table to have all sizes in one row
Code: Select Field1, Field2, "0" as Size,Field3 as Qty from orderform where Field3 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "1" as Size, Field4 as Qty from orderform where Field4 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "2" as Size, Field5 as Qty from orderform where Field5 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "3" as Size, Field6 as Qty from orderform where Field6 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "4" as Size, Field7 as Qty from orderform where Field7 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "5" as Size, Field8 as Qty from orderform where Field8 > 0; Union All Select Field1, Field2, "6" as Size, Field9 as Qty from orderform where Field9 > 0;
