(This is a modified repost - which hopefully makes sense) I am using Access2003. I am trying to set up a fast method of creating a union query. I have a jobs table that stores info about jobs with a separate table for each job that pulls together info from elsewhere when a review is conducted. The tables are as follows (and are linked from a paradox DB) :-
Table Name: jobs
JobID (J000001, J000002, etc)
Status (Live, Filled, etc)
Review Tables
Table Name: J000001 / J000002 etc
Consultant: (Joe, Terry etc)
ObjectID: (RoberI, SmithJ etc)
Status: (H, P, D, R etc)
The jobs table contains information about jobs, including a unique code (JobID) that identifies the job. There is also a status filed that tells us whether the job is Live or closed etc.
The first time a job is reviewed a new table, a review table is generated, and the name of the table is the same as the JobID for that job. So Job J000001 has a review table with table name J000001 etc. The review tables may contain information with the same ObjectID (as they are unique fields from a third table – the candidates table)
I would like to generate a union query for all jobs in table jobs with a status of live. I can do this manually, if I review a list of live jobs, with the following sql expression;
SELECT ObjectID, Consultant, Status, "J000001"
as [JobNo] FROM J000001
UNION SELECT ObjectID, Consultant, Status, "J000002"
as [JobNo] FROM J000002
UNION SELECT ObjectID, Consultant, Status, "J000003"
as [JobNo] FROM J000003;
I can then append the info into a new table. However this query is run at least twice a day and things change.
I would like to know is there a means of automatically generating sql for the union query based on results of a query of the jobs table ?
SELECT UnionTable.groupby, UnionTable.SeqID, UnionTable.Actual FROM (
SELECT VAP1.groupby, VAP1.SeqID, VAP1.SomVanbedrag as Actual FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillar_Forecast AS VAP1
UNION
SELECT VAP2.groupby, VAP2.SeqID, VAP2.SomVanbedrag as Actual FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillarIST_Forecast AS VAP2) AS UnionTablewhich is two select queries called UnionTable and a wrapper. Access handles this very well. Until you look at the SQL statement. If you don't pay attention Access stores the next query SELECT UnionTable.groupby, UnionTable.SeqID, UnionTable.Actual FROM [
SELECT VAP1.groupby, VAP1.SeqID, VAP1.SomVanbedrag as Actual FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillar_Forecast AS VAP1
UNION
SELECT VAP2.groupby, VAP2.SeqID, VAP2.SomVanbedrag as Actual FROM qryVoorplaatActualPillarIST_Forecast AS VAP2]. AS UnionTable Now when you want to execute the query you get an errormessage. Has anyone seen this before? Is this a known bug or is it a feature? Is there a workaround?
If you open the form called people you will see a command button Called add charge once pressed will open a form called charge
On the Bill To combo Box I have the following Union Select Query
SELECT PrimaryInsurance, PersonID FROM tblpeople UNION Select SecondaryInsurance, PersonID FROM tblPeople
What I want the bill to combo box to display is only the Insurances that are related to the Patient that the charge is for and not to display other patients insurances
I have Access2003 and a problem creating a simple method of constructing a union query.
I am using a commercial paradox databse that has a habit of creating a new table every time a certain action is performed. There is currently a set of 160 tables with identical fields. The database allows me to view data in these tables individually. I would like to pull the information together, from between 20 and 30 specific tables at any one time, and view the data in one table.
I have linked the tables in a an access database and would go about viewing the data by creating a union query containing each of the tables of interest. Then appending the info in these tables to a new table.
Unfortunately manually adjusting the SQL expression is a bit cumbersome to say the least I am wondering if it possible to select the tables of interest from a List Box on a simple form and have those selected inserted into the union query ?
Alternatively, the table names are actually a field within a different table. Another field within this table actually determines whether they will be of interest. So ideally I could query that table to tell me which tables need to appear in the union query. Again I would like the union query generated automatically as a result of that query.
I am confident, perhaps without good reason , that this must be possible ....
I'm having a problem with a UNION / UNION ALL query.It seems there is a application crash fault when running the query that MS are aware of and have issued a hot fix. Unfortunately it will take my IT dept some time to check and install the hot fix If they agree to do it at all.
Problem signature: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: MSACCESS.EXE Application Version: 12.0.6606.1000
Here's my problem. I need to generate a report that says how much of each individual product was produced and as well as the total produced for a specified category in a time period. Something like the following:
I currently have a query that queries a database and pulls out all products that were produced in a specified period and the categories they belong to and dump them into a local access table. Now what I need to do is search through the query results and count up how many of each product were produced (02 AA, 01 AB, etc...) and the totals for each category. The number of categories is pretty limited (6), but there are hundreds of product codes, so I need a way to do this without having to type in each induvidual product code as the requirement by which the query searches. Also, the product codes that get returned are different every day.
I was thinking something along the lines of take the product code of the first row and check for any others in the results that match and write that into another table. Then move onto row 2 and use its product code as a search parameter and search through the query results for any matches. Then continue that until the end of the query results. Can I do that? Is there a better way to achieve what I need?
I'm trying to run a UNION query that joins five queries through a MS WorkSpace into a DAO.recordset in VB. I'm pulling the data from a SQL Server Database through VB in Access. I'm attempting to open a recordset with a query passed to it as a string. The query is below. For some reason, I'm receiving a message: "MS Jet database engine cannot find the input table or query. Runtime Error 3078".
Here's what's puzzling. When I run a single query without any UNION statement, the code finds the table and runs fine without error, but anytime I join two or more queries with a UNION statement in the VB, it gives me the error.
I've executed the same UNION query in both Access Query Builder and SQL Server's Query Analyzer and they work fine in both environments. It's only when I call the query from a DAO.Recodset with VB that it causes this problem. The following is a sample of the UNION query joining two of the five queries. Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The following query executes in about 5 seconds so I don't think there's a "time-out" issue. I'm thinking that the UNION statement may be the culprit. Maybe there's another way to approach joining these separate queries? Any help would be most appreciated. Thanks.
SELECT SalespersonID, Sum([SlsPrice]-[RtnPrice]-[SlsDiscnt]+[RtnDiscnt]) AS fldPrice FROM MyTable WHERE (((Source)='d') AND ((DistrictID)='01') AND ((CategoryID) = 'HCPROD') AND ((BrandID)<>'CSS')) AND (((BrandID)<>'1356')) AND (((BrandID)<>'1400')) AND (((BrandID)<>'1551')) AND (((BrandID)<>'555')) AND (((BrandID)<>'66')) AND (TransDate >= 07/01/2005) AND (TransDate <= 07/31/2005) GROUP BY SalespersonID UNION SELECT SalespersonID, Sum([SlsPrice]-[RtnPrice]-[SlsDiscnt]+[RtnDiscnt]) AS fldPrice FROM MyTable WHERE (((Source)='d') AND ((DistrictID)='01') AND ((ProductID) = '0029800')) AND (TransDate >= 07/01/2005) AND (TransDate <= 07/31/2005) GROUP BY SalespersonID
Set wrkJet = CreateWorkspace("", "pw", "", dbUseJet) Set db = wrkJet.OpenDatabase("DW", _ dbDriverNoPrompt, True, _ "ODBC;DATABASE=DW;DSN=DW2") 'Set rs1 = db.OpenRecordset(strSQL)
I want to know how to generate a result from a query in a control of a form? For exampel I have made a SQL count function in a query and I want to use this result i a control of a form.
SELECT tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause, Count(tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause) AS CountOftxtRootCause FROM tblMainTWTTPSheet GROUP BY tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause HAVING (((tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause) Is Not Null) AND ((Count(tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause)) Is Not Null)) ORDER BY Count(tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause) DESC;
But What I am trying to do is on a form select dates and generate data in this query. which doesnot happen even if I use the following query.
SELECT tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause, Count(tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause) AS CountOftxtRootCause FROM tblMainTWTTPSheet WHERE (((tblMainTWTTPSheet.date) Between [Forms]![frmStratificationOfRootCauses]![startDate] And [Forms]![frmStratificationOfRootCauses]![endDate])) GROUP BY tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause HAVING (((tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause) Is Not Null) AND ((Count(tblMainTWTTPSheet.txtRootCause)) Is Not Null));
I am trying to run simple query make a chart in report through this query but its not generating chart?
SELECT [Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition].[Inspection Audit], Count([Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition].[Inspection Audit]) AS [CountOfInspection Audit] FROM [Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition] WHERE ((([Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition].Date) Between [Forms]![frmSafetyReportOut]![startDate] And [Forms]![frmSafetyReportOut]![endDate])) OR ((([Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition].Department)=[Forms]![frmSafetyReportOut]![cboDepartment])) GROUP BY [Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition].[Inspection Audit] HAVING ((([Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition].[Inspection Audit]) Is Not Null) AND ((Count([Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition].[Inspection Audit])) Is Not Null));
I have a query that requires a selection from my list box "[Forms]![ViewReports]![ListFilterName]"
I have a list box with a UNION so that I can query all contacts. The bound column is one.
SELECT 0,"<<ALL","TEAM MEMBERS>>" from Contacts UNION (SELECT Contacts.ID, Contacts.[First Name], Contacts.[Last Name] FROM Contacts ORDER BY [Last Name]);
Problems
The list is not ordering by last name.
The query does not assume all contacts when "<<ALL","TEAM MEMBERS>>" is selected.
Hi guys, I am trying to create a query collecting data from 4 tables as well as calculating totals delivered but it's hurting my head trying to work out all the joins can anyone help please?
The relationships are pretty straight forward, OrderNumber on Orders and OrderDetails are linked as are DeliveryNoteID on Deliveries and Delivery Details.
I want the query to list every single item for all orders as well calculating how the quantity remaining to be delivered based on deliveries so far and Qty ordered.
So I want to create a report that pretty much just displays:
I've come across a problem that doesn't make sense to me. I have a form with a combo box on it. Each time the combo box is used or the form is moved to another record it triggers an event to update the text boxes.
I get the information for the text boxes from a query. Everything was working smoothly until I decided to add a text box to the form to be filled in. My thought was I add the column from the query to the code and it will update. No dice. It doesn't recognize any information in the query. But when I run the query as a standalone it sees the text. When i open the table that holds the text, it is still there.
Code:
Private Sub cboDoctor_AfterUpdate() 'update doctor fields on the update of the combo box If Len(Me.cboDoctor) > 0 Then Call DoctorName_Change
[code]...
When i step through the code it shows values for each of the columns except for column 11. It reports as 'null.' Things I've tried:
-Updating the combo box by reselecting the value for the record. -Restarting DB. -Changing from one record in the combo box back to the original record.
Is there a limit of columns that can be used? Column 10 works just fine...
I am trying to create a database to link to an online auction site (not ebay) and I want to create a query that randomly generates auction end time and auction length for all listings. I have tried int(rnd()) and various versions but can only generate the same number for all fields in the query.
I have a library function that will allow the user to nominate a query (as one of its arguments) in the calling application which must have an email field. The function will then Do Loop the email field, concatenating it before creating an email and addressing it. The intended functionality is that a developer can easily create a group email, just by creating a query.
This works fine if the query is filtered "statically" - i.e. I specify which group of people by typing in their "Site_ID" in the criteria. However I want developers to be able to creating dynamically filtered queries (perhaps by the group's ID on a calling form). Within the query (to test it), the filter is therefore [Forms]![Test Function Calls]![Site_id]. When I run the code, I am then presented with "Run-time error 3061: Too few parameters. Expected 1". The code in question is:
Dim rst As DAO.Recordset Dim stTo As String 'one of the function's arguments received from the calling function. Dim stToString As String 'the built up concatenated emails
Set rst = CurrentDb.OpenRecordset(stTo, dbOpenDynaset, dbSeeChanges)
I am having difficulty getting a query to work, there's probably something really simple I'm missing. . . I can get the Union function to work but I can't get it to create a table for me. The basic query looks like this:
INSERT INTO test SELECT * FROM [Design] WHERE (Design.CID Not Like "*-*") UNION SELECT * FROM [Release] WHERE (Release.CID Not Like "*-*")
It works fine and shows me the table I want without the first line, but I would like it to input into a new or existing table. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
I have a UNION of two SELECT queries. It works very well but I need the end-user to be able to modify the data so I am using INSERT INTO tablename. This will work for one query at a time but if I try to use the UNION it reports “Syntax error in FROM clause”. Can you use UNION in this case or can anyone see my error?
The full statement is rather complex, I have added a few spaces and linebreaks to make it readable as follows:
INSERT INTO TableCompleteForMailing
SELECT [Address List].[FamilySurname] AS Surname,
[Address List].[DEARFirstnames] AS FirstName,
[Address List].[Mailing] AS Mailing,
[Address List].[Christmas Mailing] AS OtherMailing, [Address List].[Address 1] AS Address1,
[Address List].[Postcode] AS Postcode
FROM [Address List]
UNION
SELECT [Names].[LastName] AS Surname,
[Names].[FirstName] AS FirstName,
[Names].[MailingList] AS Mailing,
[Names].[Selected] AS OtherMailing,
[Address List].[Address 1] AS Address1,
[Address List].[Postcode] AS Postcode
FROM [Names],[Address List]
WHERE [Names].[AddressListID]=[Address List].[AddressListID]
I have tried to run for a particular week which should have 3 expense entries but only 2 have been picked up.
I think this is because both Adhoc_ Pay_Amount_2 and 3 have a value of 6 and the UNION operation will not return duplicate records. I have amended to UNION ALL but all entries are duplicated. Can anyone help?
Thanks
SELECT dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Employer_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Department, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Tax_Yr_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Period_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Session_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Code_1, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Description_1, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_1, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Timesheet_Number FROM dbo_Valid_Timesheets WHERE (((dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_1)<>0)); UNION ALL SELECT dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Employer_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Department, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Tax_Yr_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Period_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Session_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Code_2, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Description_2, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_2, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Timesheet_Number FROM dbo_Valid_Timesheets WHERE (((dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_2)<>0)); UNION ALL SELECT dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Employer_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Department, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Tax_Yr_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Period_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Session_Proc_By_Payroll, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Code_3, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Description_3, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_3, dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Timesheet_Number FROM dbo_Valid_Timesheets WHERE (((dbo_Valid_Timesheets.Adhoc_Pay_Amount_3)<>0));
UNION ALL SELECT dbo_EE_Payment_History.Employer_Ref, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Department, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Year, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Period, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Session, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Payment_Ref, dbo_EE_Payment_History.Type, Val([Payment_Value]) AS [Value], "" AS Timesheet FROM dbo_EE_Payment_History INNER JOIN dbo_Payslip_Static_Data ON (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Session = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Session_Number) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Period = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Period_Number) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Year = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Tax_Year) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Personnel_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Personnel_Ref) AND (dbo_EE_Payment_History.Employer_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Employer_Ref) WHERE (((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Year)=[Forms]![Misc]![year]) AND ((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Period)=[Forms]![Misc]![period]) AND ((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Tax_Session)=[Forms]![Misc]![session]) AND ((dbo_EE_Payment_History.Payment_Ref)=777));
UNION ALL SELECT dbo_EE_Payments.Employer_Ref, dbo_EE_Payments.Personnel_Ref, dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Department, [Forms]![Misc]![year] AS Tax_Year, [Forms]![Misc]![period] AS Tax_Period, [Forms]![Misc]![session] AS Tax_Session, dbo_EE_Payments.Payment_Ref, dbo_EE_Payments.X_Type, Val([Calculated_Value]) AS [Value], "" AS Timesheet FROM dbo_EE_Payments INNER JOIN dbo_Payslip_Static_Data ON (dbo_EE_Payments.Personnel_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Personnel_Ref) AND (dbo_EE_Payments.Employer_Ref = dbo_Payslip_Static_Data.Employer_Ref) WHERE (((dbo_EE_Payments.Payment_Ref)=777));
OK, so I am UNIONing two tables using UNION ALL. It works fine. The resultant table has 192 records (63 + 129).
If a use just UNION or UNION DISTINCT I get 184 records. I'm pretty sure that is telling me that 8 records (192 - 184) exist in both tables.
How do I query to find out what those 8 records are?? I'm trying to use an INTERSECT in MS Access, but it doesn't want to work. Here is my original query:
select * from qryMOE_Active_All UNION ALL select * from qryMOE_Closed_All;
I am a basic access user so please forgive my ignorance. I have created a union query of three tables. There is one field from the third table that I would like to have in the final table but this field does not exist in the first table. If I put "none" in the first SELECT line, then it queries correctly but the field name on the table is "Expr1006". If I put "Field 2" or [Field 2] in that same space of the first SELECT line, then it asks me for a parameter value and whatever I enter it fills in all the cells of that field with that value. I just don't know that language very well or even if you can add a new field into the first SELECT table. Thank you for any thoughts
Ex: SELECT [Field 1], [Field 2], "none", [Field 3] FROm [Table 1] UNION SELECT [Field 1], "none", [Field 2], [Field 3] FROM [Table 2]
Hello All, I need help with an Union All Query. It is ignoring the second select statement. Can anyone see what I am doing wrong?
SELECT CEPM_PLGR.COST_ELEM_CTGY AS [COST_ELEM_CTGY] , CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID AS [PROJ_ELEM_ID] , CEPM_PLGR.COST_ELEM AS [COST_ELEM] , CEPM_PLGR.SUM_UNIT AS [SUM_UNIT] , CEPM_PLGR.PRD AS [PRD] , CEPM_PLGR.CUR_BUD AS [CUR_BUD] , CEPM_PLGR.PRD_BUD AS [PRD_BUD] , CEPM_PLGR.CURRENT_ACT AS [CURRENT_ACT] , CEPM_PLGR.PERIOD_ACT AS [PERIOD_ACT] , CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_DESC AS [PROJ_ELEM_DESC] , CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_MGR AS [PROJ_ELEM_MGR] , CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_TYPE AS [PROJ_ELEM_TYPE] , NULL AS [COMMIT GA] , CSIOWNER_PELM.COST_STAT AS [COST_STAT] , CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_NBR AS [PROJ_NBR] ,NULL AS [COMMIT $] FROM CEPM_PLGR INNER JOIN CSIOWNER_PELM ON CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID = CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_ID WHERE ((CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T&M" And (CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T7M") AND ((CSIOWNER_PELM.COST_MODE)="D") AND ((CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID)<>" ") UNION ALL SELECT NULL AS [COST_ELEM_CTGY] , NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_ID] , NULL AS [COST_ELEM] , NULL AS [SUM_UNIT] , NULL AS [PRD] , NULL AS [CUR_BUD] , NULL AS [PRD_BUD] , NULL AS [CURRENT_ACT] , NULL AS [PERIOD_ACT] , NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_DESC] , NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_MGR] , NULL AS [PROJ_ELEM_TYPE] , (IIf( [PROJECT ID] Like "N0160*" And "N8100*" And "N9004*" ,(NZ([COMMIT $],0)) ,(NZ([COMMIT GA $],0)))) AS [COMMIT GA] , NULL AS [COST_STAT] , NULL AS [PROJ_NBR] , [PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL].[COMMIT $] AS [COMMIT $] FROM [PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL] WHERE [PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL].[PROJECT ID] IN (SELECT CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID AS [PROJ_ELEM_ID] FROM CEPM_PLGR INNER JOIN CSIOWNER_PELM ON CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID = CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_ELEM_ID WHERE ((CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T&M" And (CSIOWNER_PELM.PROJ_TYPE)<>"T7M") AND ((CSIOWNER_PELM.COST_MODE)="D") AND ((CEPM_PLGR.PROJ_ELEM_ID)<>" ")) AND (([PURCHASE_COMMITMENTS_FINAL].[PROJECT ID]) <> " ");
I think it is my where clause IN function. But I do not know how to fix it. any help would be great!!!! Thanks in advanced, Kerrie
Okay, people. I am getting married in a few days and my mind is on other things. Consequently, I can't get my head around this one.
I have two queries, Query1 and Query2. Both have a different number of fields but they have the field "IA Code" in common.
I want to create a new query containing all rows from Query1 and all rows from Query2. Where the [IA Code] matches, I'd like the information to be displayed in one row.
I think I need to use Union somewhere along the lines, but I can't work it out.
I have 2 tables with employee details in it. There is no natural link between the 2. I wish to write a query that will sum up the total pay for both tables.
I've had a look through the forum and it seems that a Union query is probably best.
I haven't worked with Unions before, so I did 2 sub queries to total the pay in both table and then union the 2 queries. I did this because there are some date parameters that I query each table by so I do this in the sub queries.
This works but I get 2 outputs in the result, the total pay from each table. I wanted to have just one output, which is the sum of all pay.
Can anyone help please.
SQL: SELECT QrySub_TotalPay1.TotalPay 'sub query that sums up table 1 FROM QrySub_TotalPay1 UNION SELECT QrySub_TotalPay2.TotalPay 'sub query that sums up table 2 FROM QrySub_TotalPay2;
