I am using a Table to store Parameter Values for a Split Multiuser DB. Question I have...Can I have this Table on the Front End while all the others are on th back end? The use for the table is to store parameter values for multiple queries without the user having to reenter the parameters.
I've tested this and it seems to work...but would like to know if there may be complications.
FYI. I am a Novice VBA user.
Thanks,
Felix
I have an unlinked subform on a form. This unlinked subform contains the contents of table: employee. What I want to do is have a textbox that, when typed in, will auto filter out records that don't match what was typed so that once you have correctly typed the employee name all you are left with is records of employees with that name.
View 4 Replies View RelatedDear friend,
I have a question if anyone can help me out. I have as assignment to do for a small firm. Dataentry application primarily with few search and edit functions. This will be used by multi-user.
I am yet to decide whether to make the form and the database linked or unlinked. What I mean is:
1) I want to keep form and db in seperate mdb.
2) I have to decide if the form (in seperate PCs) should be linked to the db over network or should it be programmatically connected.
3) I have a feeling that if the tables are linked with the form (the tables that i see in the database window), then when I open the form the underlying records/table will gush into the client PC jamming the network.
4) If i programmatically connect the form with the tables in the network db based on query then probably only the required record will come through the network and fill my form not jamming the network.
Any idea, pls help.
Regards,
Prodigy.
I have three tables.
The first is my table of pupils which is linked to the second table: a list of awards and a score 1-5
My third table is the list of 10 awards.
My problem is that (in my report) I want to show all 10 awards for each pupil regardless of if they have achieved them. I'm struggling with the underlying query to always show all 10 awards.
So, little Johnny has achieved a score of 5 in two of the awards, however the report card will show blanks for the remaining awards on his report.
I have four tables....that do no require relationships.
The four tables have different fields, but have one field in common, the Name.
I want to create a query with all the Names from the tables.
How?!
Hi, How don't know how stupid my question is but i was wondering if it was possible to insert a form inside an other form without linking them???
The reason for this is that the 'inserted' form would work as a 'search' form and could display usefull information for the main form to be filled even though there is not really any fields that can be linked together. Is anybody got suggestion for this matter? :confused:
I have a table (Working_Year) that is storing a single field which is the year (current_year) that is selected by the user in my initial form when the database is loaded. Am I able to use that data in other forms and reports with out linking the table? I would like to simply display the current_year the user is working in a textbox somewhere on the forms (example form named: "Main Entry") and use the current_year as a filter on reports (example report called "Gifts - by Type").
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a back-end db in access 2010, linked to a set of sharepoint tables on office365.
I want to make a completely unlinked copy of the db to store a "snapshot" of the data on a fixed date.
I have tried "save as" using the "Save as Local Database" option, but for some reason, it still saves as linked tables.
How to go about it?
How to calculate all records that have not yet been linked to other records. For example: I have 1 Product, which is linked with multiple components which is subsequently linked to subcomponents. All these types can be linked to Alternate Parts.
In order to reduce redundant information I would like to show the unlinked parts to the user. Therefore I would like to make a query which shows all unlinked parts.
I have the following tables with subsequent PK Part Number field values:
tblProduct->ProductPN
tblComponent->ComponentPN
tblSubComponent->SubComponentPN
tblAltParts->AltPartPN
I am unable to find a appropriate query structure with criteria for this issue due to the many different fields required and the fact that if in one query all these tables are shown no data will be shown ...
In a situation where I imported an excel file with so many columns and split them into two temp tables and they are linked using a key.
the data has a fixed part lets say
Field1....Field2.....Filed3.....Field4...then Field5.....Field6.....Field7....Field8 is the same data range as Field9...Field10...Field11...Field12. I would want to split this data into multiple rows like this
Field 1 Field2 Field3 Field4 Field5 Field6 Field7 Field8
Field 1 Field2 Field3 Field4 Field9 field10 field11 field12 and so own...
What is the best approach?
I have one table - 40 fields, 40000 records. Iwant split this one table up to 4 different tables (keep data). Is there an easy way, pls?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a table which contain around 10 Lacs records, now i want to split the same in to 10 or more table with 1 lac records.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm gonna get right into it; here are two tables I have in my database.
tblAccession
-Accession (PK)
-State
-Test Type
tblSamples
-Accession (FK)
-Sample
-Additional
-Cassette
-Tissue Type
-Comments
-Trim initials
-Trim date
-Section initials
-Section Date
-Control (FK from a third table)
For tblSamples, the fields:Accession, Sample, Additional, Cassette is the same for each accession and is entered when an Accession is logged in at the beginning of the process. The rest of the information (Tissue Type, Comments, etc.) is entered when various people completes those steps throughout the testing (fluctuating people and days). Should I have have the fluctuating information (tissue type, comments, etc.) as a separate table? With a one-to-one relationship? Would there be an advantage/disadvantage to splitting tblSamples into two different tables?
Hi all
I was hoping to get a little advice as to my problem. I have a database with many, many reports, forms and queries. I wanted to split the database to secure the tables and important data. So I use the database splitter wizard and ever thing went just fine. So now my database1 looks into database1_be for all tables.
My problem is: my program now runs very slow. The slowest seems to be when I am adding a new record. I can live with the slowness of retrieving an existing record. I do not have a server nor can I afford one at this time, so currently I am running a peer-to-peer network with the database1_be located on one of my computers second hard drive.
Is there something I can do to help speed things up?
Thanks Enviva
Hi there!
I'm currently working on a malformed Access database, not normalized at all.
It only consists of one table and is designed like this:
(table compartment)
#ID#Name#Member1#Member2#Member3#Member4#...#Membe r20#
So all the members are realized by single columns.
I created a new database, consisting of the main table, the "people" table and a relation table, connecting the people with the compartment (n:m relation).
It works great but I have to get the old data into the new tables. The old main table consists of more then 100 columns, and most of them are now hived off by using relations.
Now I'm looking for a smart solution to convert the table.
Do you have any idea? I tried to use a Query, but I couldn't merge two or more columns and put them in a single one on a new table.
Thank you in advance!
So I split my database into a front and back end, now i wanted to add a table to the database. I created the table in the backend but I am not sure how to make it appear in the front end. I am using access 2010. I tried the link table manager but the table I created doesn't appear there.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm working on recreating my church's records in access and was originally wanting to take people from the Visitors table and automatically move the to the Members Table (and same with Deceased & Moved), but after some searching found that's not really do able. So now my question is, can I have a master table that has everybody (visitors/members/deceased/moved) and then split that into different tables while keeping the main table (that way I can go into the main table and reassign the person)?
View 7 Replies View RelatedSo i split my database into a front and back end, now i wanted to add a table to the database. I created the table in the backend but im not sure how to make it appear in the front end. Im using access 2010. I tried the link table manager but the table i created dosent appear there.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an Access 2007 file that is 'split' so the tables are centrally stored on the server.
How do I update one the linked tables stored in the back-end file with a table from another Access file?
If I import the 'new' table it is not 'linked' - it is embedded with the Access file I am working on.
What is the correct way of doing this without corrupting the data?
My boss made a satisfaction database that tracks satisfaction in 2 ways, so we have:
Table
ID
SatisfactionAType
SatisfactionAScore
SatisfactionBType
SatisfactionBScore
I'd like to make a query that would split these into two lines, one for A, one for B and then export it to excel.
I have a table with the folowing structure:
ID(integer)
Value1(Double)
Value2(Double)
I need to split this table in 4 equals parts:
- count of id must be equal or close to equal(ex: 467 split in 3 x 117 and 116) for each part
- the cumulated Value1 and Value2 must be equal or close to equal for each part
Hi All,
I've developed a database that was working fine until I split it to use in a network enviroment. The problem is a make-table query that now make it's table in the front end instead of the back-end. I need to run a make-table query because the query uses a custom function which then causes errors when the query is accessed by a web form that I use.
The only way I thought of getting round it was to create a permanent table in the back-end which is cleared every time and an append query used to populate it.
Anybody any other ideas?
Cheers
I have a table with the folowing structure:
ID(integer)Value1(Double)Value2(Double)
I need to split this table in 4 equals parts:
- count of id must be equal or close to equal(ex: 467 split in 3 x 117 and 116) for each part
- the cumulated Value1 and Value2 must be equal or close to equal for each part
I've created several Split forms that have the data input fields in the form with the relevant query datasheet shown below. As you tab through the form fields, the various cells in the datasheet are highlighted and move across the data row (as one would expect!). I want to put a particular field / Column at the start of the datasheet so that it's always available for view, but it seeme that what ever I do the column ends up back at the very far end of the data row!
I've sussed out the "Freeze Fields" facility which will keep the first column visable whichever cell is highlighted across the data row.
The column I want as the first column currently sits at the far end of the data row. So far I have dragged the row to the first column position; I've arranged the Query driving the form so that the column is at the front of the row, both in design view and in datasheet view, but to no avail. Everything I do to put the column at the start of the row in the datasheet shown below the form ends up with it back at the far end of the row the next time I open the form.
My db is split into front-end and back-end. In the f-e's Relationships schematic, I can see the relationships as they were defined at the time when the db was split, complete with the one-to-many symbology.
I can add a new table to the b-e and set its relationship as one-to-many, enforcing referential integrity and cascading as I wish - and the schematic (in the b-e) reflects that.
In the f-e, I can then use the <Get External Data - Access Database> function to link to the new table, and I can add the new table to the relationships diagram in the f-e. I can also drag and drop to link primary and foreign keys (within the f-e), but cannot select one-to-many. I'm OK with that, as I understand that the relationship is within the b-e, and this is just a diagrammatic representation.
But I can see the one-to-many relationships between the tables which existed when the db was split, and I would like to be able to see the new table's relationships in a consistent fashion. Updating the linked tables via the Linked Table Manager does not do the trick.
Surely I don't have to split the database again in order to achieve a consistent diagram - do I ?
I have elected to have tables inserted into my forms. For example on the School Information form, I have the Employees table inserted at the bottom so that it will show the employees that are assigned to that school when it's pulled up.
Before I split my database into a BE/FE situation, I could expand the items in the tables to other related items, but now that option is gone.
Is there any way to get that back with a split database?