My task is to compare our master membership table with a second table, removing matching names in the second table from the master table. (The second table are those individuals who chose not to receive a paper newsletter, so we want to save money and trees :) and not send them one.)
So to remove those names I tried the find unmatched query wizard but that only allows me to chose on one field it seems. There is no single unique identified field that would do this for both tables.
I thought if I built an unmatched query using the fields 'Last_Name' and 'Address1' and 'PostalCode' that should be sufficient for the task.
Here are portions the individual SQL statements that I need to get into one query.
FROM tblAllMembers LEFT JOIN qrySeekbyGroup ON tblAllMembers.Last_Name = qrySeekbyGroup.[Last Name]
WHERE (((qrySeekbyGroup.[Last Name]) Is Null));
FROM tblAllMembers LEFT JOIN qrySeekbyGroup ON [tblAllMembers].[Address1] = [qrySeekbyGroup].[Mailing Address Line 1]
WHERE ([qrySeekbyGroup].[Mailing Address Line 1] Is Null);
FROM tblAllMembers LEFT JOIN qrySeekbyGroup ON [tblAllMembers].[Postal_Code] = [qrySeekbyGroup].[Postal Code]
WHERE ([qrySeekbyGroup].[Postal Code] Is Null);
How is the SQL written so the find unmatched query will use all three of these sections in on query.
I have 10 tables, 30+ fields on each table (every table has the same 'account number' field). I only need from 5 - 20 fields from each table. How do I get the certain fields from each table and put them in a table, query or report?
I created an unmatched query with the wizard and it works fine - when I want to compare with only one field. Is there anyway possible for it to compare two fields? I need for it to look at field1 and field2 when checking for unmatched records. Any ideas?
I have a query in an Access 2003 database that list fields from two tables. I want a query based on this query to pull out records where the interest rate does not match the PrimePlusMargin. See code below:
SELECT [95_1324].ACCOUNT, [95_1324].[CLIENT'S NAME], [95_1324].[OPEN DATE], [AR PlanDefinition].[ARL Plan], [95_1324].[Interest Rate], [AR PlanDefinition].Margin, 6 AS Prime, [Prime]+[Margin] AS PrimePlusMargin FROM 95_1324 INNER JOIN [AR PlanDefinition] ON [95_1324].[ARL Plan] = [AR PlanDefinition].[ARL Plan] ORDER BY [95_1324].[OPEN DATE] DESC;
I think I figured it out but it doesnt work completely. I created another field called "No Match" and set the criteria to "No Match" See code:
When I run the code, the pop up parameter asking for PrimePlusMargin. I know I spelled it correctly. If I just say ok, it returns all records. PrimePlusMargin is an alias field. Does this matter?
In table 1 I have some document #s e.g. 320 321 322 170 171 172 151 152
In table 2 I have some document #s e.g. 170 171 151
I would like to create a query, that will look at the document #s starting with 17* and 15* in table 1 and look for it in table 2, if the document #s do not exist, I would like the query to spill out the following:
I have a a table that changes monthly, and each month I need to find the records from the old table that are not in the new table and visa versa. I made the entire row in the table the key. and wrote two find unmatched queries. However, the queries are not finding all the information that is no longer there or that has been added. Can someone please take a look and see what I am doing wrong? Any help appriciated!! Thanks
tbl_returns ID NAME RETURN 123 Store A 9999 123 Store A 8888 789 Store C 9999
I want to find the stores that exist in the stores table, but not in the returns table WHERE the RETURN is equal to 9999. This would hopefully return 456 Store B
My problem is when I put a condition in my query it returns nothing as the condition is based on the left joined table.
SQL SELECT tbl_stores.store, tbl_stores.name FROM tbl_stores LEFT JOIN tbl_returns ON tbl_stores.store = tbl_returns.store WHERE tbl_returns.store Is Null AND tbl_returns.survey_id=2 GROUP BY tbl_stores.store, tbl_stores.name, tbl_returns.store
I have a table listing 147 Company training Policy# with each Position to which each policy applies. Not all Policy# applies to every position, i.e. Driver versus Office staff. There are 32 employees in 7 different positions.
I have a table of Employee Records with standard information including Employee ID and Position.
I created a select query from the Employee Record and the above training requirements that provides a data list of every employee to each pertinent training policy by inner joining Positions with three columns Policy# and Title from the Policy# table and Employee ID from the Employee Record table.
I am trying to create a query that will tell me by Policy# what Employee has no record of being initially trained in that particular Policy #. I have built a query but it doesn’t give me a complete listing of missing employees.
SELECT qryPolicyByEmployeeID.CWSPolicy, qryPolicyByEmployeeID.EmpID, qryPolicyByEmployeeID.Title FROM qryPolicyByEmployeeID LEFT JOIN TrainingLog ON qryPolicyByEmployeeID.EmpID = TrainingLog.EmpID WHERE (((TrainingLog.EmpID) Is Null)) ORDER BY qryPolicyByEmployeeID.CWSPolicy, qryPolicyByEmployeeID.EmpID;
My problem occurs at the “Where” statement. When inquiring on a specific Policy# and the EmpID is in the training log for any other Policy# that EmpID does not appear in the listing. I am trying to figure a way to get around this.
Has anyone a suggestion as to how I can make that happen? I am very flexible about changing table layouts if that will get me what I need.
This is my first post on this forum so I was wondering whether you guys could help me.
I import data from a server daliy. My DB has three tables containing print files;
Print: shows leaflets that have been printed Package: shows leaflets that have been packaged Dispatch: shows leaflets that have been dispatched
Since data can only be imported at the end of the business day, I needed to create a query which will show the files that have printed but havent been packaged. To do this I created an unmatched query and tested it, it works fine.
This unmatched query has now been placed in a sub form, I would like the users to add comments next to the rows in the queries. However since the unmatched query cannot be updated I was wondering if there is any way of around it
I have two tables with 'BatchNo' in common. However, there are some batches on Table1 where the sum of the 'Paid' amount does not equal the sum of the 'Paid' amount on Table2. I tried using the unmatched query wizard to find these records, but because it may find the batch number on Table2, it returns nothing.
How do I say look for the 'BatchNo' AND the 'Paid' amount and return the ones that are not equal?
Is it possible to create an unmatched queary between two tables that do not have unique keys, but instead use a combination of two columns that would be unique (for example date and trans# where trans# is unique per day)?
Both tables have both columns, date and trans#.
If this is possible please help me understand how to do it. I only know how to use the standard unmatched query wizard and it seems to only compare one column.
I have a report based on an unmatched query. Sometimes the query doesn't return any results. When this happens, the "Detail" section of the report displays #Error. How can I get the report to show $0.00 for the dollar fields if there are no results in the unmatched query?
I have several tables that I am trying to get information from:
Clock Number Table with fields: Clock #, Name, Title, Dept, Term, HireDate, & TransDate.
Completed Training with fields: Clock #, Data Completed, Doc # & Rev Level
Linked Table, Controlled Documents with fields: Doc #, Title, Effective Date & Rev Level
Linked Table, Distribution Table with fields: Doc #, Distribution, Rev Level & Effective Date.
Some of the tables have more fields that those listed, but they do not pertain to this query.
I am trying to create queries that will provide me with the names of employees who have not been trained on Controlled Documents that have been distributed to their department.
So far, I have been able to determine if no one has been trained, but if even one person has been trained, they do not appear on my list. I would like to know the Clock # and name of those that have not been trained.
I have created 3 queries to get this far. Query 1 is the Clock # Table and the Completed Training Table joining the Clock #. Query 2 is the Controlled Document Table and the Distribution Table joining the Doc #, Rev Level. Query 3 takes these queries and joins Doc # and Rev Level. and pulls records where the Rev. Level and Doc # is Null.
I have a query pulling data from several tables. In the middle I've got join between a part number in a BOM table and a part number in an inventory table.
What I want is the query to return the inventory location when we have stock. When we have nothing in, then there would be no entry in the inventory table and it should return a blank or null in this and all the proceeding tables.
I need to design an unmatched query on 2 tables to identify employees names that exist in 1 table but not the other (or names are misspelled, etc.). The tables exist in on a server and I do not have the ability to change either. Table 1 has the following structure:
EMPLOYEE NAME: Doe, John ID-12345 Table 2 has the following structure: LAST NAME: Doe FIRST NAME: John
Since the field names are not equal, the unmatched query wizard (as far as I know) will not work. I've tried using "NOT LIKE", LEFT JOINS, RIGHT JOINS, NUll Values, etc. in the SQL but nothing has worked as yet.Here's the SQL I've been working with but this returns all values (haven't figured out why):
SELECT DISTINCT [Table 1].[EMPLOYEE NAME] FROM [Table 1], Table 2 WHERE ((([Table 1].[EMPLOYEE NAME]) Not Like "([Table 2].[LAST NAME]*"));
I have a Unmatched query that displays what I need but I want to clean up my database and remove them but its not letting me. See sql below.
Code: DELETE Warranty FROM Warranty LEFT JOIN Serials_Repair ON Warranty.[Serial] = Serials_Repair.[Serials_Repair] WHERE (((Serials_Repair.Serials_Repair) Is Null));
I changed "Delete" it was "Select" thinking that would work but it does not.
I created 3 find unmatched queries from the query wizard. The first one works great. I can delete a record in the query and it deletes the record in the main table.
The second one allows me to delete a record and gives me the pop up box that says " you are about to delete 1 record". I click yes, but when I check the table or reopen the query the same record reappears.
The third query does not even give me the option to delete.
I can create a regular select query and delete the records form 2nd and 3rd but not from the queries made from the unmatched wizard.
I am using the same fields in all 3 queries.
I do not have enforce referential integrity or the other 2 options checked in the relationship properties. (not sure if this makes a difference.)
I even tried to redo the unmatched queries but I get the same result for all 3.
I want to be able to delete the records in the other 2 queries.
I am trying to create a query that matches two other querys and finds records that are in the primary, but not the secondary query. I have tried to use the query wizard for this, but it will not work for me the way I want.
If I have A,B,C,D in one query and only have A,B,D in the other I want to find C, so that I can format an email funtion in my database using that data.
I am needing to compare some information in a way I cant with the normal Unmatched Query.
I have 2 tables with the fields:
| PHONE1 | PHONE2 | FIRST | LAST |
What I need to do is have Table 2 check against Table 1 to see if any of the 'PHONE1' records match 'PHONE1' or 'PHONE2,' and if they do have them remove just the information from PHONE1, not the entire record.
Then I would have to repeat the process to do this with PHONE2. Having it check against 'PHONE1' and 'PHONE2' in Table1.
If both PHONE1 and PHONE2 have a match, the entire record would be deleted. If not, it would keep whichever did not match.
I am currently having to do this manually, because if I just run an Unmatched Query it gets rid of the whole record regardless of if PHONE2 is a good number or not.
If any more information is needed, let me know. Like I said, Im relatively new to working in Access and dont know much.
Is there anyway to join 15 queries into 1 (all have the same data from a different source but need merged into 1 large query) rather than doing 12 unmatched queries?
Let's say I have 5 records in the first query, 5 records in the 2nd, and 3 records in the third - I want to end up with 1 query that has 13 records.
I need constructing a find unmatched query. I don't really know what I'm doing with SQL and I think that I can only take things so far with query design view.
I have two tables. T_Productions and ProPro (see attached). In Access query design, I can only specify one matching criteria. I need a query that will show me records from T_Productions that don't have matching Production_Code (PpNum in ProPro), Avantage_Product_Code (PpPrNum in ProPro) and Step (PpEtape in ProPro) in ProPro.
What I have now only gives me the records where Avantage_Product_Code don't match PpPrNum.
Code: SELECT T_Productions.ID, T_Productions.Production_Code, T_Productions.Avantage_Product_Code, T_Productions.Step, T_Productions.Quantity_Required FROM T_Productions LEFT JOIN ProPro ON T_Productions.[Avantage_Product_Code] = ProPro.[PpPrNum] WHERE (((ProPro.PpPrNum) Is Null));
