.NET Framework Issue With SQL 2005 Db Mirroring
Oct 25, 2007
We have a .NET application with a backend SQL 2005. The issue started when we setup DB mirroring on this db. The issue is an System.InvalidOperationException that is thrown every once in a while when connecting to the databases. The message is 'Internal .Net Framework Data Provider error 6.'.
Both Operating System (Windows 2003) and databases (SQL server 2005) are up to date, including all Security Updates and Service Packs.
The issue disapeared when we stopped db mirroring.
Any one has this issue?
Thanjs
Ayad
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 22, 2007
Hi,
Can anybody help me with the following problem:
I have Vista Ultimate installed and within Vista .NET Framework 3.0 is installed as a part of the operating system so I can't remove 3.0
Now for MS SQL Server 2005 Express I need .NET Framework 2.0 and the SQL Server 2005 doesn't work with .NET Framework 3.0
Can't install 2.0, get the message that 3.0 is already installed.
Please help me!!
René
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2007
Running [dbo].[insertlogin] ( @log = hiten, @pas = hiten ).A .NET Framework error occurred during execution of user-defined routine or aggregate "insertlogin": System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Must declare the scalar variable "@Log".System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionSmi.EventSink.ProcessMessagesAndThrow(Boolean ignoreNonFatalMessages) at Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.SmiEventSink_Default.ProcessMessagesAndThrow(Boolean ignoreNonFatalMessages) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteNonQuerySmi(Boolean sendToPipe) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(DbAsyncResult result, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at SqlServerProject1.StoredProcedures.insertlogin(SqlString log, SqlString pas).No rows affected.(0 row(s) returned)@RETURN_VALUE = Finished running [dbo].[insertlogin]. ***************************************************************all i am trying to do is : creating a SP in VS using managed code and then trying to execute it. But every time i get the above error. If you can tell me how to edit connection string in this that would be very helpful. At present i am using : Using conn As New SqlConnection("context connection=true") I tried to do "" ALTER ASSEMBLY SqlServerProject1 WITH PERMISSION_SET=EXTERNAL_ACCESS""but i get this error "" Msg 10327, Level 14, State 1, Line 1ALTER ASSEMBLY for assembly 'SqlServerProject1' failed because assembly 'SqlServerProject1' is not authorized for PERMISSION_SET = EXTERNAL_ACCESS. The assembly is authorized when either of the following is true: the database owner (DBO) has EXTERNAL ACCESS ASSEMBLY permission and the database has the TRUSTWORTHY database property on; or the assembly is signed with a certificate or an asymmetric key that has a corresponding login with EXTERNAL ACCESS ASSEMBLY permission. If you have restored or attached this database, make sure the database owner is mapped to the correct login on this server. If not, use sp_changedbowner to fix the problem.""" *********************************************************************Plz help
View 13 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2007
I have Visual studio 2003 with .NET Framework 1.1 installed on it. I need to interface it with SQL Server 2005. But SQL server 2005 installs .NET Framework 2.0. And Visual Studio .NET 2003 cannot use the .NET Framework 2.0 assemblies.
So I need help on whether I can interface visual studio 2003 with .NET Framework 1.1 with SQL Server 2005 ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2008
Is it possible to use the visual studio 2008 to create SQL server SP having .net framwork 3.5 to run on SQL Server 2005?
View 21 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2006
Does anyone know if there are any issues with .Net Framework 2.0 and SQL Server 2005?
Here is my problem .....
I have a web application running on a Windows 2003 Server SE with IIS 6.0. We recently migrated all of our databases to SQL Server 2005 and now we are getting an exception when retrieving data from the DB (Exception Below). We have switched our databases back to Sql Server 2000 and the problem does not occur. Any Help would be much appreciated.
-Ryan
Event Type: Error
Event Source: .NET Runtime 2.0 Error Reporting
Event Category: None
Event ID: 5000
Date: 7/3/2006
Time: 10:15:46 AM
User: N/A
Computer: WEBSERVER12
Description:
EventType clr20r3, P1 w3wp.exe, P2 6.0.3790.1830, P3 42435be1, P4 system.data, P5 2.0.0.0, P6 4333aea2, P7 1946, P8 25, P9 system.invalidoperationexception, P10 NIL.
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Data:
0000: 63 00 6c 00 72 00 32 00 c.l.r.2.
0008: 30 00 72 00 33 00 2c 00 0.r.3.,.
0010: 20 00 77 00 33 00 77 00 .w.3.w.
0018: 70 00 2e 00 65 00 78 00 p...e.x.
0020: 65 00 2c 00 20 00 36 00 e.,. .6.
0028: 2e 00 30 00 2e 00 33 00 ..0...3.
0030: 37 00 39 00 30 00 2e 00 7.9.0...
0038: 31 00 38 00 33 00 30 00 1.8.3.0.
0040: 2c 00 20 00 34 00 32 00 ,. .4.2.
0048: 34 00 33 00 35 00 62 00 4.3.5.b.
0050: 65 00 31 00 2c 00 20 00 e.1.,. .
0058: 73 00 79 00 73 00 74 00 s.y.s.t.
0060: 65 00 6d 00 2e 00 64 00 e.m...d.
0068: 61 00 74 00 61 00 2c 00 a.t.a.,.
0070: 20 00 32 00 2e 00 30 00 .2...0.
0078: 2e 00 30 00 2e 00 30 00 ..0...0.
0080: 2c 00 20 00 34 00 33 00 ,. .4.3.
0088: 33 00 33 00 61 00 65 00 3.3.a.e.
0090: 61 00 32 00 2c 00 20 00 a.2.,. .
0098: 31 00 39 00 34 00 36 00 1.9.4.6.
00a0: 2c 00 20 00 32 00 35 00 ,. .2.5.
00a8: 2c 00 20 00 73 00 79 00 ,. .s.y.
00b0: 73 00 74 00 65 00 6d 00 s.t.e.m.
00b8: 2e 00 69 00 6e 00 76 00 ..i.n.v.
00c0: 61 00 6c 00 69 00 64 00 a.l.i.d.
00c8: 6f 00 70 00 65 00 72 00 o.p.e.r.
00d0: 61 00 74 00 69 00 6f 00 a.t.i.o.
00d8: 6e 00 65 00 78 00 63 00 n.e.x.c.
00e0: 65 00 70 00 74 00 69 00 e.p.t.i.
00e8: 6f 00 6e 00 20 00 4e 00 o.n. .N.
00f0: 49 00 4c 00 0d 00 0a 00 I.L.....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2006
Hi
I am running VS.NET 2003 on my computer and wish to try to install the *free* SQL server express 2005 .
The problem is I can't install SQL express as it asks me to install .NET framework 2.0 first.
I wonder if I do so, will I be able to work with VS.NET 2003?
Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2007
Hi all. I am using Microsoft Visual Basic .Net 2002 with .NET Framework 1.0. I want to install free SQL Server database. I want to install SQL Server 2005 Express Edition but it requires .NET Framework 2.0. If I installed MSDE 2000, it doesnt have that Enterprise Manager.So, how is this possible for me to use the free SQL Server with that Enterprise Manager ? Thanks in advance.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2006
Are there any issues calling SQL 2005 CLR bases stored procedures and functions from a web application which uses the dotnet 1.1 framework?
I assume not, but would like advice from those who've been there...
Thanks,
Marie
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2007
Hi,
Can anybody help me with the following problem:
I have Vista Ultimate installed and within Vista .NET Framework 3.0 is installed as a part of the operating system so I can't remove 3.0
Now for MS SQL Server 2005 Express I need .NET Framework 2.0 and the SQL Server 2005 doesn't work with .NET Framework 3.0
Can't install 2.0, get the message that 3.0 is already installed.
Is there another version of SQL Server that works with .NET Framework 3.0 and runs under Vista Ultimate?
Please help me!!
René
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2007
We've deployed an assembly to a new production sql server 2005 instance, and have been having periodic restarts of sql server. The sql server service appears to be stopping and restarting on it's own since the assembly was deployed.
We've narrowed it down to a decryption method. We haven't been able to produce the issue on a consistant basis. Even if we put a ton of load on the stored procedure calls.
The error is below we receive (I cut out some, so it would fit in the thread), we also have mdmp files, that I've attempted to debug with Visual Studio 2005 and Windbg with no success. I have all the symbols (I'm pretty sure), but I don't have much experience with WinDbg, so it's been slow going.
Here's a little about the environment.
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64 SP2
Microsoft SQL Server version 9.00.3042.00 SP2
16 MB physical memory
Quad 3.2 GHz Xeon
3 sets of raid drives.
c: OS
e: sql data
e: sql logs
All Sql and windows patches are up to date.
Only thing I can figure is this is something to do with the .NET libraries. When the assembly was compiled it was set to compile for any CPU. We even tried compiling on the 64 bit OS with no luck still.
If anyone has had a similar issue, it would be most helpful, thanks,
Byron
---------------------------------------------------------------
Memory
MemoryLoad = 9%
Total Physical = 16382 MB
Available Physical = 14760 MB
Total Page File = 32159 MB
Available Page File = 30633 MB
Total Virtual = 8388607 MB
Available Virtual = 8365517 MB
**Dump thread - spid = 56, PSS = 0x0000000092BDFE90, EC = 0x0000000092BDFEA0
***Stack Dump being sent to C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLLOGSQLDump0067.txt
* *******************************************************************************
*
* BEGIN STACK DUMP:
* 10/14/07 15:49:11 spid 56
*
* A fatal error occurred in .NET Framework runtime.
*
* Input Buffer 62 bytes -
* u t i l s . d b 17 00 75 00 74 00 69 00 6c 00 73 00 2e 00 64 00 62 00
* o . d e c r y p t 6f 00 2e 00 64 00 65 00 63 00 72 00 79 00 70 00 74 00
* B a s e 6 4 §@ 42 00 61 00 73 00 65 00 36 00 34 00 00 00 00 01 a7 40
* Ã? 4 1f 09 04 d0 00 34 00 00
*
*
*
* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Short Stack Dump
0000000077D67D8D Module(kernel32+0000000000027D8D)
0000000001D345DE Module(sqlservr+0000000000D345DE)
0000000001D3F3A9 Module(sqlservr+0000000000D3F3A9)
0000000002156D83 Module(sqlservr+0000000001156D83)
00000000021571C2 Module(sqlservr+00000000011571C2)
000006427F8F5FFD Module(mscorwks+00000000005C5FFD)
000006427FA4855B Module(mscorwks+000000000071855B)
000006427F888C4B Module(mscorwks+0000000000558C4B)
000006427F5D51C8 Module(mscorwks+00000000002A51C8)
000006427F5D5113 Module(mscorwks+00000000002A5113)
000006427F453A5A Module(mscorwks+0000000000123A5A)
0000000077F251EC Module(ntdll+00000000000651EC)
0000000077EE5F36 Module(ntdll+0000000000025F36)
0000000077EF31DD Module(ntdll+00000000000331DD)
000006427FA5089B Module(mscorwks+000000000072089B)
000006427806C7F8 Module(mscorlib.ni+000000000006C7F8)
000006427806B564 Module(mscorlib.ni+000000000006B564)
000006428029CBB7 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000642788A6088 Module(mscorlib.ni+00000000008A6088)
000000000818E8F0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E7D0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E090 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5F40 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5F60 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5F90 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5FC0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5FD8 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A6020 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A63B0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000019 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000000841EC050 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5F40 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5F60 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5F90 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5FC0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5FD8 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A6020 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A6020 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A6180 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A63B0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000001900000409 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000001 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E7D0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E200 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E200 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000064280400218 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E250 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E230 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFE Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000001C52423 Module(sqlservr+0000000000C52423)
0000000000000001 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
00000005010A5F40 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000001900000409 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000001 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000000 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000000000818E340 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000080D262B0 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000006428029C31E Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
0000000000000004 Module(UNKNOWN+0000000000000000)
000006427F5B3B52 Module(mscorwks+0000000000283B52)
-----------------------
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2006
Has anyone ever recieved an error when starting the Management Studio?
"Unhandled excpetion has occurred in a component in your application.
"Input String was not in a correct format"
I click continue and I can still use the manager;however, it gets annoying. The details of the error are very long and too much to add to this thread.
Any ideas?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2005
Hi all,
Yesterday, I just downloaded the SQL Server 2005 Express (SQLEXPR.EXE) and tried to install it in my Windows XP Pro PC that is on Microsoft NT 4 LAN System. I got the following error: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 CTP setup The Microfost .NET Framework 2.0 is not installed. Please install before running setup.
This morning, I downloaded the NET Framework Version 2.0 Redistributable Package Beta 2 (x86) from the Microsoft Download Center and installed it in my Windows XP Pro PC. Then I tried to install the SQL Server 2005 Express (SQLEXPR.EXE) again. This time I got a new error: SQL Server 2005 Setup has detected incompatible components from beta versions of Visual Studio, .NET Framework, or SQL Server 2005. Use ADD or Remove Programs to remove these components, and then run SQL Server 2005 Setup again.
I am confused and lost in this installation problem. Was the .NET Framework Version 2.0 Redistributable Package Beta 2 (x86) a wrong Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 I downloaded and installed in my PC? Where is the right Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 for the SQL Server 2005 Express? Please help and advise.
Thanks in advance,
Scott Chang
View 23 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2007
I am trying mirroring in my own laptop in 2 different instances of 2005 but when i configure it gives me an error "one or more of the server network addresses lacks a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). Specify the FQDN for each server, and click start mirroring again"
does anyone know what is the problem???? i read one post but could not understand properly.
Narayan
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2006
i setup sql 2005 mirroring
when i run the wizard and start mirroing i get the folllowing error:1418
in the log it says database mirroring login attempted by user NT AUTHORITY/ANONYMOUS logon does not have connect permissions on the endpoint
my service acount is LOCAL SYSTEM
all 3 sql servers are in same workgroup
i can connect with studio to all 3 with no problem
any one have any clues here
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2007
Hi everyone,
I have a project on my hand in which i need to implement two SQL 2005 servers
And configure it as DB mirroring.
I know that for the sake of 'fail over' I need to configure a witness
server as well.
My question is:
For the purpose of the mirror server and the principle server - what
are the software requirements (enterprise, standard?)
For the purpose of the witness server - what are the software
requirements (enterprise, standard, express?)
Should the witness server be a 'server' in terms of hardware...or is
it enough to establish a strong pc machine?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2007
Hi guys,
I have read many articles on the matter and I have probably used up all my printer's ink in doing so, however, some questions still remain.
1) What happens if I have to reboot the mirror.. security update, etc.? Obviously the session is broken during reboot, but would I have to do another backup of the principal and resync everything?
2) I know it is not best practice but at this point I have no choice, however, I wanted to get your guys feedback on having two instances of SQL2005 on my development box. One for the mirroring of the production and the second for development. The two instances would live on their own drive... not partitioned and have adequate memory and space.
What would I have to look forward with this?
3) Lastly, I am still uncertain if mirroring is approved for production. Is it?
Thanks for your help.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2007
I am working on a proof of concept to take to our Technical Board.
This POC is concearned with SQL server 2005 Mirroring for High Availability and Failover in a Highly Critical business sector.
The problem is that we use custom web pages to give the Operations Center an overview of the status of the system and that there are so many metrics available (not may are well documented). I have looked at the following
sys.database_mirroring_witnesses
is_suspended to show the state of the Sync
database_name to return the name of the mirrored database
safety_level_desc to show that the Safety level is at Full
Principal_server_name to show the name of the Principal server
Mirror_server_name to Show the Name of the Mirror Server.
I am at a loss as to what is the best approach as I do not want to display too much Information and confuse.
The Servers are locked down to remove any permissions not required so I have to create a SQL account with only acces to the required sys views. one issue is that the following SQL only works on the Principal
Code SnippetSelect * from sys.database_mirroring where mirroring_guid is not null
The Principal returns
Code Snippet
7 267CF8D3-8066-44EA-84BD-B7EA25C3F779 4 SYNCHRONIZED 2 MIRROR 20 2 FULL 1 TCP://DNGLHRSQL051.XX.XX.XXX:5022 DNGLHRSQL051 TCP://LHRSQL029.XX.XXX.XXX:5023 1 CONNECTED 40000000010300001 10 NULL UNLIMITED
where the Mirror will return nothing..
The configuration of the User is identical on both Principal and Mirror and is as follows
Master Public
MSDB Public, dbm_monitor
I have read that the User also requires "view any Database" but on the Mirror this database is not available on the Mirror as it is in Sync.
Is this an undocumented Feature?
Any help greatly appreciated
Regards
Andy
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2006
I am trying to set up a SQL mirroring senario - I have some questions
Do I need to purchase an extra SQL Server license for the SQL server instance on the Mirror? what about the Witness does that also need a separate license/
Can the witness be a virtual server on the Mirror box itself? Do I still require a license if the witness is on a virtual server?
Thanks
jawahar
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2008
Hi all,
I am using SQL 2005 (Enterprise Edition, SP2) Mirroring with a Principal, Mirror and Witness set to High Safety mode and am a little confused!
As far as I understand it, during a failover, although the database content will automatically be available on the Mirror any user accounts will need to be either manually created or manually mapped to the new principal. Is this the case? If so, I can't really see the purpose of using Mirroring (in my scenario anyway).
For example - We principally use the database servers for our web applications which we connect to using ADO.NET. Each database and Web app has a different SQL user account to allow access etc. If we experience a failover this means the users will not be able to use the web app until we have manually recreated/mapped the SQL accounts for each and every database. Surely this is a massive oversight?! Or am I simply getting the wrong end of the stick.
Any help/guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Richard
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2006
Hello,
I have to do an impact analysis for migrating a .Net web based application. The current and desired scenarios are mentioned below.
The current environment:
OS - Windows 2000, SP4
Framework - .Net 1.1
SQL Server - MSSQL Server 2000
Desired Environment:
OS - Windows 2003, SP1 / Windows 2003 R2
Framework - .Net 1.1
SQL Server - MSSQL Server 2005
Please let me know
1. If any changes need to be done in the application when migrating the database from 2000 to 2005?
2. Any relevant document which will help me in the same.
Regards, Venkat
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2006
Hello all,
Many people are angry at MS for promising and not delivering on the mirroring feature of SQL 2005.
Does anyone have any idea - officially or unofficially when this feature will be available for reliable use, as we would like to use it.
Thanks,
S.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2006
I'm devlving into 2005 and specifically mirroring.Having read the following article (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pr...5/dbmirror.mspx ),is mirroring a sensible option as it indicates that it should not beused in a production environment, yet the SQL2005 seminars I've been toindicate that this is a worthy option.Do we also need a witness server, or can this be done (sensibly) withtwo SQL2005 servers ?Currently we have 2xSQL2000 (clustered) servers and a SAN for the data.If we go down the route of mirroring, it looks like we can get rid ofthe SAN and Cluster and use the mirroring instead.Any advice on the pro's / cons would be appreciated.ThanksRyan
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2006
Can I know is it possible using database mirroring for only certain tables from the database, not for the whole database in sql server 2005. Hopefully able to get any assistance here. Thx alot.
Best Regards,
Hans
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2005
Hi, for SQL 2005 - to set up database mirroring, is it required to have Active Directory installed or to be part of a domain? I am looking to use a workgroup with the SQL machines only and to not reference any domain and cannot find this information - is this possible?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2007
Hi, im trying to mirror a database with SQL server 2005. I have completed all the setup for this, including attacthing a copy of the principal database and all the other settings. When I completed the Mirroring wizard, it prompted me to start mirroring and when I accepted, it gave to me the following error:
TITLE: Database Properties
------------------------------
An error occurred while starting mirroring.
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Alter failed for Database 'CTM'. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.3042.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText&EvtID=Alter+Database&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
The server network address "TCP://DBNAME.domain1.local:5022" can not be reached or does not exist. Check the network address name and that the ports for the local and remote endpoints are operational. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 1418)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.3042&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=1418&LinkId=20476
Can anyone help me withthe problem.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2007
I am new to 2005 mirroring but have read a lot of documentation on it. I want to use mirroring to centralize a bunch of DBs to one location and then back them up from that central point. However, from what I've read since the mirror is kept in a "recovering state" it cannot be accessed directly. Does that mean I wont be able to backup the mirrors? If so, are there any work arounds or different strategies for this?
Thanks!
Craig
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2006
Hi....
I have sql server 2005 evaluation edition. And This version doesn't provides Mirroring option.Even after installation of service Pack1. Is there any other edition (Freeware or Evaluation) which provides the Database Mirroring.
waiting for the prompt reply.
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2007
Can I use Database mirroring between 2005 Std and 2005 Ent editions?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2006
Hi, iam from Mexico,
somebody has installed SQL 2005 with mirroring and sharepoint 2007?
regards.
thanks
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2008
Server A = primary SQL DBs (mirroring origination)
Server B = failover SQL DBs (mirroring destination)
For database mirroring a witness is required.
Can the witness live in another instance of SQL on server B?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2007
Hello, My question is simply: according to BOL, a DB snapshot taken from a Mirror is read-only. Say I wanted a temporary (disposable) read-write DB created from the snapshot. Is there a way to generate a writable temp DB (that's not tempdb) from the snapshot? Thanks,AK
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2007
I am developing an enterprise class solution using SQL Server 2005 and MS .NET v2 and am tying determine if SQL Server 2005 (which edition and if so how) would be adequate for my proposed solution. Any feedback, tips, comments would be greatly appreciated.
As a background the solution I am developing will be web services based and used by multiple offices around the globe by over 500 users. I have already developed a prototype using a single SQL Server 2005 instance but as this solution is going to be used by offices around the world I want to have an IIS Server and SQL Server 2005 server instance in each office with "links" back to the primary SQL Server 2005 cluster in Australia.
One of my thoughts was to set up replication between the offices that would happen at midnight remote office local time and then set up triggers to update the primary cluster when assoociated data was changed on the remote sites or on the primary cluster. Does anyone know or can anyone suggest alternatives to this strategy?
I effectively need some sort of inter site caching functionality with store and foreward capabilities ...
Thanks
Andrew
View 6 Replies
View Related
