2000 To 2005 SQL Statement Order By Issue

Jul 9, 2007



Hi,

I have a simple sql statement that used to work in SQL 2000 that isn't working in SQL 2005. The order by clause doesn't seem to have any effect on the result set. The sql statement is:



ALTER VIEW dbo.SELECT_PP_END
AS
SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT

PP_PERIOD_ID,

CONVERT(VARCHAR, PP_END_DATE, 101) AS PP
FROM dbo.PP_PERIODS
ORDER BY PP_END_DATE DESC



The period end date is appearing in ascinding order on sql server 2005 and in the correct order in sql 2000. Any idea? Thank you for your help



- T.A.

View 7 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL 2005 Bug? Not Follow The Order By Sequence In View...but SQL 2000 Does!

Aug 24, 2006

I have a table:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tx1]( [f1] [nvarchar](50) , [seq] [int] IDENTITY(1000,1) NOT NULL ) ON [PRIMARY]

SELECT *
FROM dbo.tx1
ORDER BY seq DESC

go

f1 seq
zz 1003
uu 1002
kk 1001
yy 1000


create view vx1 as
SELECT top 100 percent *
FROM dbo.tx1
ORDER BY seq DESC
go
select * from vx1

yy 1000
kk 1001
uu 1002
zz 1003







View 7 Replies View Related

TSQL - Use ORDER BY Statement Without Insertin The Field Name Into The SELECT Statement

Oct 29, 2007

Hi guys,
I have the query below (running okay):



Code Block
SELECT DISTINCT Field01 AS 'Field01', Field02 AS 'Field02'
FROM myTables
WHERE Conditions are true
ORDER BY Field01

The results are just as I need:


Field01 Field02

------------- ----------------------

192473 8461760

192474 22810



Because other reasons. I need to modify that query to:



Code Block
SELECT DISTINCT Field01 AS 'Field01', Field02 AS 'Field02'
INTO AuxiliaryTable
FROM myTables
WHERE Conditions are true
ORDER BY Field01
SELECT DISTINCT [Field02] FROM AuxTable
The the results are:

Field02

----------------------

22810
8461760

And what I need is (without showing any other field):

Field02

----------------------

8461760
22810


Is there any good suggestion?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Aldo.

View 3 Replies View Related

Select Statement Works In 2000 But Not In 2005

Jan 2, 2008

I hope this is a easy one. We are trying to find a fix for a select statement that works in 2000 but not in 2005 with a simple select statement.

The easiest statement that will duplicate the error is:

TestTable has 3 columns: Primary, strTest, strTest2



SELECT strTest, strTest AS Name
FROM TestTable
ORDER BY strTest2



If you sort by the Primary column you will not receive an error.

How can you select the same column twice and then sort in the SQL statement?

View 3 Replies View Related

UPDATE Statement Differences Between 2000 And 2005

Jun 21, 2007

I just wanted to post a difference I found between SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 regarding UDPATE statements that are done on a join. I understand that if tables are designed correctly this won't be a problem. But, when you inherit a bad design, you are unfortunately stuck with it. Hopefully this will help ease data differences in your migration from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005.



Run this code on a SQL 2000 connection, then run on SQL 2005. My guess on the behavior difference is strictly performance based since 2005 pulls the top result. Either way it can cause a lot of head scratching if you're not aware of it.



IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#UpdateTestA') IS NOT NULL

DROP TABLE #UpdateTestA



IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#UpdateTestB') IS NOT NULL

DROP TABLE #UpdateTestB



CREATE TABLE #UpdateTestA(

UpdateTestA int identity(1, 1),

FullName varchar(20),

UpdateData varchar(10))



CREATE TABLE #UpdateTestB(

UpdateTestB int identity(1, 1),

FullName varchar(20),

UpdateData varchar(10))



INSERT INTO #UpdateTestA(

FullName)

VALUES ('Barney Rubble')



INSERT INTO #UpdateTestB(

FullName,

UpdateData)

VALUES ('Barney Rubble', 'First')



INSERT INTO #UpdateTestB(

FullName,

UpdateData)

VALUES ('Barney Rubble', 'Second')



SELECT * FROM #UpdateTestA



UPDATE a

SET a.UpdateData = b.UpdateData

FROM #UpdateTestA a

INNER JOIN #UpdateTestB b on b.FullName = a.FullName



SELECT * FROM #UpdateTestA



DROP TABLE #UpdateTestA

DROP TABLE #UpdateTestB



Hope this solves a problem that you were having too.

View 3 Replies View Related

Sql Statement Order By...

Aug 2, 2005

Hi Ladies and gentlement,i have a column as below in table in my sql server 2000Cavity (column name)2A2B2A3A3C2C3B1A1Bi select them and bind it to a datagrid as below:strsql="select Cavity from tlb_Cav order by Cavity DESC"actually i wish to display them in order of their alphabet but the statement above unable to make it... can any1 show me some guard on this so tat it looks like below:1A2A2A3A1B2B3B2C3Csorry if this sound stupi*...but i really no idea except i seperate them into 2 columns...Regardslife's Ng

View 2 Replies View Related

Order By Statement Name Begining With A

Sep 18, 2006

HelloCan anybody tell me the correct MS SQL statement to display names: Where each name displayed is starting with a certain letter of the alphabet only.  For example:The list should show names starting with the letter A (what must I change in my statement below) SELECT LastN, FirstN, TelFROM People_DBWHERE LastN = 'A' ORDER BY LastN ASCLast NameAdams,

View 2 Replies View Related

Problem With ORDER BY Statement

Sep 28, 2005

I have list of sort options say Relevance, Date Posted, Salary and Job Location. I want to ORDER the search results with the options given above. Relevance, Salary and JobLocation in ascending order and Date Posted in Descending order. I tried adding ORDER BY to the below statement using case but its not working out. And ORDER BY doesn't accept variables as well. Can I use ORDER BY or Is their any other way handle this.Thanks in Advance.SELECT J.* FROM JobDetails AS J JOIN(SELECT DISTINCT J1.JobID FROM JobDetails AS J1inner join dbo.Split1(@list, ' ') AS SON J1.JobPosition LIKE '%' + S.Data + '%') J1 ON J1.JobID = J.JobIDSavvy

View 3 Replies View Related

Union And Order Statement

Jun 8, 2007

I have the following query and for some reason when I try to run it, it tells me there is an incorrect syntax near the 'union' statement. Can you tell me what is wrong with this?

SELECT MDN,
DATEPART(d,CallDate) as CallDate,
DATEPART(hh,CallDate) as Hour,
sum(ceiling((Cast(DurationSeconds as Decimal)/60))) as Minutes
FROM VoiceCallDetailRecord
WHERE DurationSeconds > 0 and CallDate >= '02/19/2007' and calldate < '03/19/2007' and COS = 3
AND (((CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '21:00:00' AND '23:59:59') OR (CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '00:00:00' AND '07:00:00'))
OR DATEPART(weekday, CallDate) in (1,7)) and NOT (Left(Endpoint,3) IN ('011')
or (Left(Endpoint,4) IN ('1340','1876','1868','1809',
'1246','1242','1780','1403',
'1250','1604','1807','1519',
'1204','1506','1709','1867',
'1902','1705','1613','1416',
'1905','1902','1514','1450',
'1418','1819','1306','1867')))
order BY DATEPART(d,CallDate), DATEPART(hh,CallDate), MDN
UNION
SELECT MDN,
DATEPART(d,CallDate) as CallDate,
DATEPART(hh,CallDate) as Hour,
sum(ceiling((Cast(DurationSeconds as Decimal)/60))) as Minutes
FROM ZeroChargeVCDRecord
WHERE DurationSeconds > 0 and CallDate >= '02/19/2007' and calldate < '03/19/2007' and COS = 3
AND (((CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '21:00:00' AND '23:59:59') OR (CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '00:00:00' AND '07:00:00'))
OR DATEPART(weekday, CallDate) in (1,7)) and NOT (Left(Endpoint,3) IN ('011')
or (Left(Endpoint,4) IN ('1340','1876','1868','1809',
'1246','1242','1780','1403',
'1250','1604','1807','1519',
'1204','1506','1709','1867',
'1902','1705','1613','1416',
'1905','1902','1514','1450',
'1418','1819','1306','1867')))
order BY DATEPART(d,CallDate), DATEPART(hh,CallDate), MDN

View 5 Replies View Related

Alternative To CASE In The Order By Statement?

Feb 15, 2008

 The query below at the bottom works, but when I try to add the line below (a third line/argument in the CASE statement) then I get an error. It is not possible to have a table name and a DESC (sort order) in the same CASE line/argument. Are there other ways to accomplish this, because I would like to sort with both "h.ObjectType" and "h.ObjectType DESC"?             WHEN @SortBy = 2 THEN h.ObjectType DESC      SELECT weight, ObjectText.ObjectId, ObjectText.ObjectType, ObjectText.Title, ObjectText.ShortText    FROM @hits h INNER JOIN ObjectText ON h.id = ObjectText.ObjectId AND h.ObjectType = ObjectText.ObjectType    WHERE ObjectText.LanguageCode = @LanguageCode    ORDER BY        CASE WHEN @SortBy = 0 THEN weight             WHEN @SortBy = 1 THEN h.ObjectType        END    DESCRegards, Sigurd 

View 4 Replies View Related

Convert Access IIF To Sql In Order By Statement

Jan 13, 2004

ive been having a lot of trouble converting this last line from my access database to sql server. i was hoping someone could help



order by Name, IIF(Risk.Calc like H*, 1, IIF (Risk.Calc like M*,2,3)), Risk.Chance*risk.cons DESC, risk.title


any suggestions?

View 5 Replies View Related

Writing Union Statement With 2 Order By's

Jun 20, 2008

Hi,

I'm trying to write a UNION statement with 2 selects and can't figure out for the life of me how to do it.


select top 10 * from tblusers ORDER BY dateJoined
UNION
select top 10 * from tblusers ORDER BY lastLogin

The union works fine without the order by's, but I really need the order by's in there and I don't understand why its so difficult to do. Surely there must be some other strategy?


Any help is much appreciated.. thanks!!
mike123

How can I reproduce this results ?

View 7 Replies View Related

Can You Use Column Order Value In Select Statement

Nov 6, 2005

Is there a shortcut to spelling out column names when you are doing a select statement?

For instance could you write Select 1, 5, 6 from table where whatever...

I tried this but didn't get any results so if you can I must be using wrong syntax.

Thanks
!

View 2 Replies View Related

Limit And Order In Union Statement

Mar 18, 2008

hi all,

i have the following union statement, which works like a charm:SELECT [Name], [EventID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], [Date], NULL AS [StartDate], [Date] AS [SortDate], [Type] FROM [Events] WHERE [TourID] IS NULL AND AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel UNION SELECT [Name], [TourID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], NULL AS [Date], [StartDate], [StartDate] AS [SortDate], '2' AS [Type] FROM [Tours]WHERE AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel ORDER BY [SortDate]

now i want to ad a limit to this statement, but i can't get it working. i have tried this:SELECT * FROM (SELECT [Name], [EventID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], [Date], NULL AS [StartDate], [Date] AS [SortDate], [Type] FROM [Events] WHERE [TourID] IS NULL AND AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel UNION SELECT [Name], [TourID] AS [ItemID], [TourID], NULL AS [Date], [StartDate], [StartDate] AS [SortDate], '2' AS [Type] FROM [Tours]WHERE AccessLevel <= @AuthenticationLevel) ORDER BY [SortDate] LIMIT 2
but i keep getting an error message saying "Incorrect syntax near the keyword "ORDER". what am i doing wrong?

-bm

View 6 Replies View Related

Strange Behaviour In ORDER BY Statement

Jul 20, 2005

HiI've done a search and found plenty on ORDER BY problems, but mineshopefully a syntax error.This is a test segment from my stored procedure.DECLARE @Name varchar(50), @SortType IntSET @Name = "canal lock"SET @SortType = 8SELECT dbo.ite_Item.ite_IDFROM dbo.ite_Item LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.iti_ItemImages ONdbo.ite_Item.ite_ID = dbo.iti_ItemImages.iti_LinkToItemWHERE iti_ItemImages.iti_LinkToPhotoType=1AND ite_Name LIKE '%' + @Name + '%'ORDER BYCASEWHEN @SortType = 3 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_DateWHEN @SortType = 5 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_ViewsWHEN @SortType = 7 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_DescriptionEND ASC,CASEWHEN @SortType = 2 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_NameWHEN @SortType = 4 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_DateWHEN @SortType = 6 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_ViewsWHEN @SortType = 8 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_DescriptionEND DESC,CASEWHEN @SortType <> 2 THEN dbo.ite_Item.ite_NameEND ASCI get various errors:@SortType = 2. This is a Name field varchar(50)Syntax error converting the varchar value 'Canal Lock' to a column ofdata type smallint.I only have one smallint col and that is the ite_Views column. Why isit trying to convert a varchar(50) col?@SortType = 3. This is a ISO date field nchar(8)The conversion of the nvarchar value '20030909' overflowed an INT2column. Use a larger integer column.Why?@SortType = 7, 8. These are description fields varchar(5000)Syntax error converting the varchar value '<snip>' to a column of datatype smallint.Again, why?All other sort types are fine.What I'm thinking is that when the ORDER BY code is run, it does someconversion but what?Many thanks in advance if anyone has any ideas?Sam

View 3 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Order By Used With Case Statement

Sep 24, 2015

I use Order By Used with Case Statement and may be this is the reason for which i am getting error

Windowed functions can only appear in the SELECT or ORDER BY clauses.

Here is my complete sql where i use Row_Number function for pagination with sorting.

DECLARE @StartIndex INT
DECLARE @EndIndex INT
DECLARE @SortColumn VARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE @SortDirection VARCHAR(MAX)
SET @StartIndex = 1

[Code] ....

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Order Of Preference In Case Statement

Sep 9, 2015

I'm trying to set up a statement that gives me a field called 'BINNO' if the payor = Commercial. But, I have a few customers that don't have Commercial. They have a Payor of Grant or Part D. How would I set up a statement that looks for Commerical 1st...then Grant or Part D. I started with this

case when inscomp.payor = 'COMMERCIAL' then INSCOMP.BINNO

View 9 Replies View Related

Column Aliases In Case Statement In Order By

Jan 18, 2007

Hi All,

I have this query :

select col1, col2, col3, col4, col5,..... , (select col99 from tab2) as alias1 from tab1 where <condition>
order by
case @sortby
when 'col1' then col1,
when 'col2' then col2,
when 'col3' then col3,
when 'col99' then col99
end

when i execute the above query it gives me the following error message.

Server: Msg 207, Level 16, State 3, Line 1
Invalid column name 'col99'.

Thanks in advance.

Thanvi.

View 5 Replies View Related

TSQL: I Want To Use A SELECT Statement With COUNT(*) AS 'name' And ORDER BY 'name'

Jul 23, 2005

I am very new to Transact-SQL programming and don't have a programmingbackground and was hoping that someone could point me in the rightdirection. I have a SELECT statement SELECT FIXID, COUNT(*) AS IOIsand want to ORDER BY 'IOI's'. I have been combing through the BOL, butI don't even know what topic/heading this would fall under.USE INDIISELECT FIXID, COUNT(*) AS IOIsFROM[dbo].[IOI_2005_03_03]GROUP BY FIXIDORDER BY FIXIDI know that it is a simple question, but perhaps someone could assistme.Thanks,

View 18 Replies View Related

Error Using Case Expression In Order By Statement

Feb 22, 2008

I have been trying to get the following Selects to work using a case expression in the order by section.

I know I can easily separate out the two statements but I want to do a select using the case statement below ;
however, I keep getting error 16 --"Order by items must appear in the select list if the statement contains a union.

If remove the case statement and put order by "internalID desc" I receive no errors. Moreover, when I take out the union statement and execute the two select statements with each including the case expression it runs as planned.

Can anyone tell what the problem is here? I have combed the web looking for an answer, but it seems that the statement is valid.


Thanks
J
declare @date
set @date = '2001'



select internalID from section_data_v3

union

select internalID from section_data_v4

order by
case when (@date = '2001') then internalID end desc

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Order Of Execution Of Statement With GO Statements?

Jan 16, 2014

Curious if I have the code below as an example and I execute this code does sql execute from top to bottom? And does the Update run and complete before the delete occurs? Or does SQL execute the update and delete in parallel?

UPDATE tbl1 SET col1 = 1

GO

DELETE FROM tbl1 where col2 = 2

View 2 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Select Statement With Derived Order Status

Aug 28, 2015

Here is my requirement

Table 1 Order
order ID, Sales order ID order date, order type

Table 2 Order details
Order Details ID, Order ID, Order Stage

Table 3 Related Order details
Order ID(FK to Order ID), Related Order Details ID(FK to Order Details ID), Related Order ID( FK to Order ID)

Here is example

Table 1 Order
1, 1234, 2015-01-01, Refill
2, 1234, 2015-02-02, Extension

Table 2 Order Details
1, 1, Approved
2, 1, Approved
3, 2, Rejected

Table 3 Related Order Details
2, 1, 1
2, 2, 1

I have to Select Order, Order Details and Order Status

Order Status is determined from Order Stage as follows:

If, at least one order detail line(from Order Details and Related Order details table) is approved, that Order status=Approved.

For the example, Order Status of Order ID=2, is Approved based on order status for order details lines 3(from table 2) and order details ID 1 and 2 (from table 3)

How to combined order stage from table 2 and table 3 and then compute order status.

View 3 Replies View Related

Order By Clause In DECLARE CURSOR Select Statement Won't Compile

May 7, 2008

The stored procedure, below, results in this error when I try to compile...


Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure InsertImportedReportData, Line 69
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ORDER'.

However the select statement itself runs perfectly well as a query, no errors.

The T-SQL manual says you can't use the keywords COMPUTE, COMPUTE BY, FOR BROWSE, and INTO in a cursor select statement, but nothing about plain old ORDER BYs.

What gives with this?

Thanks in advance
R.

The code:




Code Snippet

-- ================================================
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
IF object_id('InsertImportedReportData ') IS NOT NULL
DROP PROCEDURE InsertImportedReportData
GO
-- =============================================
-- Author: -----
-- Create date:
-- Description: inserts imported records, marking as duplicates if possible
-- =============================================
CREATE PROCEDURE InsertImportedReportData
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
@importedReportID int,
@authCode varchar(12)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @errmsg VARCHAR(80);

-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;

--IF (@authCode <> 'TX-TEC')
--BEGIN
-- SET @errmsg = 'Unsupported reporting format:' + @authCode
-- RAISERROR(@errmsg, 11, 1);
--END

DECLARE srcRecsCursor CURSOR LOCAL
FOR (SELECT
ImportedRecordID
,ImportedReportID
,AuthorityCode
,[ID]
,[Field1] AS RecordType
,[Field2] AS FormType
,[Field3] AS ItemID
,[Field4] AS EntityCode
,[Field5] AS LastName
,[Field6] AS FirstMiddleNames
,[Field7] AS Title
,[Field8] AS Suffix
,[Field9] AS AddressLine1
,[Field10] AS AddressLine2
,[Field11] AS City
,[Field12] AS [State]
,[Field13] AS ZipFull
,[Field14] AS OutOfStatePAC
,[Field15] AS FecID
,[Field16] AS Date
,[Field17] AS Amount
,[Field18] AS [Description]
,[Field19] AS Employer
,[Field20] AS Occupation
,[Field21] AS AttorneyJob
,[Field22] AS SpouseEmployer
,[Field23] As ChildParentEmployer1
,[Field24] AS ChildParentEmployer2
,[Field25] AS InKindTravel
,[Field26] AS TravellerLastName
,[Field27] AS TravellerFirstMiddleNames
,[Field28] AS TravellerTitle
,[Field29] AS TravellerSuffix
,[Field30] AS TravelMode
,[Field31] As DptCity
,[Field32] AS DptDate
,[Field33] AS ArvCity
,[Field34] AS ArvDate
,[Field35] AS TravelPurpose
,[Field36] AS TravelRecordBackReference
FROM ImportedNativeRecords
WHERE ImportedReportID IS NOT NULL
AND ReportType IN ('RCPT','PLDG')
ORDER BY ImportedRecordID -- this should work but gives syntax error!
);

END

View 3 Replies View Related

Using The ORDER BY Clause When The Ordered Column Is Not Needed In The SELECT Statement

May 15, 2008

Greetings,

I have a C# application that calls a stored procedure to query the database (MSSQL 2005). I only have one field/column returned from the query but I need that column ordered.

How do I use the ORDER BY clause without returning the index column which does the sorting? The first example is NOT what I want. I want something that works like the second example which only returns the 'Name' column.


ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MyProcedure]



AS

BEGIN

SELECT DISTINCT A.Name, A.index

FROM
...
...
ORDER BY A.[Index], A.Name ASC

END



ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MyProcedure]



AS

BEGIN

SELECT DISTINCT A.Name
FROM
...
...
ORDER BY A.[Index]

END

Thanks

View 14 Replies View Related

Install Sql 2005 Instance With Reporting Service 2005 On Sql 2000 With RS 2000 Server

Aug 18, 2006

Hi

We would like to install Sql 2005 Enterprise Edition (including database engine, reporting service, integration service and analysis service) as a sepearte instance on a server which already has Sql 2000 with reporting services and analysis services. We do not want to disturb the existing sql 2000 setup.

If we do that then what will happen to my earlier sql 2000 reporting service? Will it be upgraded to sql 2005 reporting service? I heard that reporting services are instance unaware application. Where will be the default reporting service database available?

Please help us.

Regards,

Sankar N

View 1 Replies View Related

Using Case Statement To Determine Order By Field And Direction (asc Or Desc) When Using Row_number

Aug 21, 2007

I am trying to order by the field and direction as provided by input parameters @COLTOSORTBY and @DIR while using a CTE and assigning Row_Number, but am running into syntax errors.

Say I have a table called myTable with columns col1,col2,col3,

Here's what I'm trying to do

with myCTE AS
(
Select
col1
,col2
,col3
,row_number() over (order by
case when(@DIR = 'ASC') then


case when @COLTOSORTBY='col1' then col1 asc
when @COLTOSORTBY='col2' then col2 asc
else col3 asc
end
else

case when @COLTOSORTBY='col1' then col1 desc
when @COLTOSORTBY='col2' then col2 desc
else col3 desc
end
end
from myTable
)



Please let me know what i can do with minimal code repetition and achive my goal of dynamically sorting column and direction. I do not want to use dynamic SQL under any circumstance.

Thanks.

View 7 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Adding N Prefix In Update Statement In Order To Store The Text Correctly?

Sep 4, 2014

The FirstName and LastName values being passed in are in cyrillic text.

How do I add the N prefix in the update statement in order to store the text correctly.

I've tried FirstName = N@Firstname

or FirstName = '''N''' + @FirstName + '''

[dbo].[sp_UpdateDealerPeopleInfo](
@PersonId char(9),
@OriginalSID char(9),
@FirstName Varchar(50),
@LastName Varchar(50),

[code].....

View 8 Replies View Related

Upgrade From SQL 7 To 2000(also Change Sort Order)

Jul 9, 2002

Hi,
We ae planning to upgrade SQL 7 to SQL 2000 curretly we have BInar sort order.We have to cahnge the sort order to Dictionary sort order in SQL 2000 as per the recomendation from application vendor.
What is the best way Ican do this? Can I cahnge the sort order at the time of upgrade without effecting the data?
Thanks in advance
Mohan

View 1 Replies View Related

Order Of Database Maintenance Plans (SQL 7/2000)

Jul 20, 2005

I want to know if there is a "best-practice" for setting up DatabaseMaintenance Plans in SQL Server 7 or 2000. To be more specific, I wantto know the order in which I complete the tasks. Do I completeoptimization first, then integrity checks, then translog backup, thenfull backup??? OR is there a better order which should be used?Should I ALWAYS backup the transaction Log before I complete a fulldatabase backup, and if so, why??If someone can help, it would be great.....

View 2 Replies View Related

View Ignoring Order By - Used To Work In Sql 2000

Dec 13, 2005

This works fine in  SQL 2000, but not in SQL 2005

View 12 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000-- 'Order Details' Table Exisr

Jul 26, 2007

Hi

I have came across a table in SQL server 2000 which named 'Order Details' in the sample 'Northwind' database which is available with the product. Am using the eval version . Generally no table name exist with a 'space' between the words. But the table 'Order Details' exist in the Northwind sample database.

Due to the naming convention i can't run sql queries on that. Is anyone aware of this type of issues.

Pls help

View 1 Replies View Related

Order Help SQL 2005

Jan 13, 2008

Using SQL 2005. I trying to write a view in the sql by linking two table while ordering the second one so how can i write this?

SELECT GetMaxId.CallId,
GetMaxId.AssignName AS AnalystId,
GetMaxId.EngName AS AnalystName,
GetMaxId.ActionType AS AnalystAction,
tblUAF.UserId,
tblUAF.UserAction,
tblUAF.Comments,
tblUAF.vDate,
GetMaxId.AssignDate,
GetMaxId.FinishDate,
GetMaxId.DirCode,
GetMaxId.SecCode

FROM GetMaxId
INNER JOIN tblUAF ON GetMaxId.CallId = tblUAF.CallId

WHERE (dbo.vw_GetMaxId.ActionType = 'close') OR
(dbo.vw_GetMaxId.ActionType = 'resolved')

I want to order the second table tblUAF assending and then link it to vw_GetMaxId in one becuse i want to select the last record from the second table tbUAF but in the sql statment above it select any record which is wrong for my case.

View 4 Replies View Related

ORDER BY Clause Does Not Work In SQL 2005?

Feb 6, 2006

Hi,
A quick background on the problem;
My company is in the process of a migration from Windows Advanced Server 2K, SQL 2K to Server 2003 and SQL 2005. I'm not certain of the exact process used by our DBA to convert the DB, but I can access it, and all my tables/views/sprocs appear to be in the right place.
I copied all my web files to our new server after the DBA was done with her job, made a new user on the new instance of SQL server, changed a few connection strings in my global.asa and global.asax, and ta-dah! Just like magic, the new site opened on our new servers without much resistance.
Except....
None of the content on our sites is sorted. I cannot seem to get ORDER BY statements to work at all. They appear to be disregarded by SQL server when not in MODIFY mode for a particular view (in SQL Server Management Studio).
So, when I MODIFY a view, add criteria (NOT SORT), save the changes, then OPEN, the criteria is respected. The filter is applied. BUT...
If I MODIFY a view and add a SORT using ORDER BY (by hand or with the Manager) the sort is NEVER respected when the view is Opened through the manager or in my code.
If I open any sorted view and then click MODIFY, and then RUN (without making ANY changes), the sort works with no problem whatsoever.
To summarize/restate my case, if I OPEN any view in the system that has an ORDER BY criteria, the sort is NOT APPLIED. If I instead right-click and MODIFY, then click RUN, the SORT is APPLIED.
I've tried sorting datetime and text fields, all with the same results - none. This single dumb issue has been delaying the migration of our servers for days!
Can anyone help?
 
Thanks always in advance,
Drew
 

View 10 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved