I uninstalled the 32-bit Standard version but during install of the 64-bit trial version I got an error that the integration services could not install because the 32-bit version of COM+ was already registered and you can't have both. Need some help how to resolve this issue. Thanks
View 3 RepliesWe are in need of a solution to our problem. We are working for a customer and cannot use their database to work on during development. We have copied the layout and made a sample db for our development.
Rather than writing down all the changes we make to our own db and then making the same changes to the customer's, is there a better way? Can we use something like sourcesafe?
Thankyou
I've got a few SQL Servers at work which are development servers using SQL Server Standard Edition. I would like to downgrade them to SQL Server Developer Edition to save the Standard Edition licenses for production purposes. However, i do not wish to uninstall and reinstall SQL Server Developer Edition, restore all the dbs. Is there a way to change the version of the SQL Server ?
View 2 Replies View Related
Hi All,
Can we have 2 versions of SQL Server on the same server? Example, can I install SQL Server 2000 and 2005 on the same server? Please let me know about all the combinations possible/not possible.
Thanks a lot.
Mannu.
Is there a way to do the following -- I need to be able to update a table based on a selection by a DDL. So here are my two update queries:
1. Update RequestData Set Approved = True Where DeptID = @DeptID2. Update RequestData Set Approved = True (Yes I need to be able to do all of the rows at once.)
But it's all based on the selection of the DDL---I really don't want to have to create two seperate sql commands any ideas?
Is there a way to remove old versions of a DTS package without rewriting the entire package?
These packages run fine but take up more space than I am willing to allocate.
I understand the SANs are only Supported by SQL Server 2000 Enterprise and no other versions of SQL, can anyone supply information to the contrary please?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHas anyone ever attempted to run 6.5 & 7.0 from the same server?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThis may seem like a wierd question, but can I have 6.5 and 7.0 running on the same machine? I need 6.5 for production builds and 7.0 for test. Is this possible? THanks
Frank
I can see that SQL server 2000 trial is available for download, but I need to try out 7 for a particular project at work. Is this available for trial download? (Has it ever been?)
Thanks.
Hi all...
I'm a MySQL user and I want to switch to MS SQL Server, I heared that there is more than one type of MS SQL Server and one or two can be downloaded for free. Can someone tell me the different types of MS SQL Server and where can I download those free versions?
Hi,
Our server has SQL Server 2003 installed, I'd like to use SQL Server Express 2005 as I'm about to try and learn ASP.NET and most tutorials use that.
Will installing Express 2005 conflict with the Server 2003? Can both version be run on one server?
Thanks.
I'm running a SQL 7 db on a LAN in city A with other users accessing it fromanother city (city B) over a WAN. Obviously the WAN users are getting muchslower access to the data. One thing I was wondering was if it was possibleto have two versions of the database, one on each server, and have themautomatically synchronize as users at each location make changes. Or, ifthat's not possible, then at least have the city B users get any changesthat the city A users get as they are made.Thanks for any input.Neil
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to run both SQL200 standard and SQL2005 Express on thesame server? I need to test a database created in 2005 on ourproduction server but don't want to upgrade our "live" databases yet.
View 2 Replies View Related I have a server with sql 2000 and 2005 installed on it. When I try to connect to the msde 2000 database with an app or with managment studio express I get the following error
"An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: -1)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=-1&LinkId=20476"
But When I go through dos and type osql -S(local)database -E
it connects to the correct msde instance. How can I fix this with out uninstalling sql server 2005????
We will be upgrading from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005. From what I have read, as part of the installation of SQL 2005 we will be installing the .Net framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005.
We currently have production .Net applications which were developed in Visual Studio 2003 with the .Net framework 1.1.
We plan at some point to upgrade our applications to Visual Basic 2005, but we were planning on upgrading to SQL 2005 first.
I have a couple of questions about this.
1) We are a small shop and the same server which hosts our production applications also hosts SQL server for our model office and test applications. Can we have both versions of the common language runtime running on the same server?
2) Our .Net applications access the SQL data through stored procedures or views. I have run the Upgrade Advisor and it does not look as though there are any signficant upgrade issues with our SQL database objects, so we are tentatively planning on changing the compatibility levels of our databases to 90 after they are imported to SQL 2005. Assuming we take care of any SQL issues that we do have with our database objects, should we expect to encounter problems running our existing applications, under the older version of vb.net, and accessing our databases once we have upgraded to SQL 2005? (Of course we plan to test everything, but I just wanted to know if we should anticipate anything in particular.)
Thanks.
Hi
If i develop a web application with sql server developement edition, it works fine in my webserver, or my webserver has to have the sql server development too?
I'm interested in sql server report services. if i develop a web application with this tool what kind of version of sql server has to be installed in my webserver?
Thank you
SQL 2000 Client tools SQL7 SP3 Server back-end.
I have a DTS Package created with SQL2000 client tools, which contains a SQL connection and a sql task (exec sp_who2). When I run the package on my PC it works, when I run the package via SQL Agent it comes back with :-
DTSRun: Loading... Error: -2147287038 (80030002); Provider Error: 0 (0) Error string: The system cannot find the file specified. Error source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package Help file: sqldts.hlp Help context: 713. Process Exit Code 1. The step failed.
I am not using any files. The DTS Package is called PMC_Test
Here is the dtsrun syntax from the SQL Agent job.
DTSRun /S "APP003" /N "PMC_Test" /E
When I try and open the DTS package using SQL7 client tools I get the same error message.
I'm trying to correct an error that a user is getting when running SQL Server 7.0 SP3, Desktop edition/ Windows NT 4.0 SP6. The error says that C:WINNTSYSTEM32odbcint.dll and C:WINNTSYSTEM32odbccp32.dll are different versions. I tried to install MDAC 2.5 sp1 to correct this problem but this message continues throughout the install. This is causing sqlagent service to hang. Any ideas of how to reinstall ODBC components without reinstalling the OS?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone know of problems when using SQL7 Server and SQL2000 Client tools when editing and saving DTS Packages ?
My SQL 7 Server doesn't seem to recognise the DTS Package if saved from SQL 2000 Client tools, but works happily with packages saved from SQL7.
Can anyone clarify ?
I know this is a very basic question for all of you but I need help.
I am a CPA working with a client to select an accounting & project management software for a construction client. In the top 5 choices, there are 2 that require MS SQL Server as the DB. This client will have about 10-20 users, including project managers & accounting personnel but by DB standards transaction volumes will be low. The company has a few large projects. There is no inhouse IT staff; network administration is outsourced.
The question on the table is this? How much more difficult is it to use MS SQL server in this environment? If all of the client's requirements can be met using a run-time version of Sybase, Pervasive, or FoxPro, isn't this the simplest solution. I don't want to recommend an elephant if it is not needed. I would appreciate your opinion....Thanks
Database newbie question: My sample database (T-SQL syntax): CREATE DATABASE sample GO USE sample CREATE TABLE customers (CustomerId int IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,name varchar(50),address varchar(50)) CREATE TABLE invoices (InvoiceId int IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,date datetime,CustomerId int REFERENCES customers(CustomerId)) INSERT customers (name,address) VALUES ('First Company Ltd.','New York') INSERT customers (name,address) VALUES ('Second Company Ltd.','Washington') INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 1, 2004',1) INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 2, 2004',1) INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 2, 2004',2) SELECT * FROM customers GO CustomerId name address 1 First Company Ltd. New York 2 Second Company Ltd. Washington SELECT i.date,c.name,c.address FROM invoices AS i INNER JOIN customers AS c ON i.CustomerId=c.CustomerId GO date name address 2004-01-01 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Washington UPDATE customers SET address='Boston' WHERE name='First Company Ltd.' GO INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 3, 2004',1) SELECT * FROM customers GO CustomerId name address 1 First Company Ltd. Boston 2 Second Company Ltd. Washington SELECT i.date,c.name,c.address FROM invoices AS i INNER JOIN customers AS c ON i.CustomerId=c.CustomerId GO date name address 2004-01-01 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. Boston 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. Boston 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Washington 2004-01-03 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Boston Is it possible in any of the RDBMS's to make this last query return the following result set? 2004-01-01 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Washington 2004-01-03 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. Boston
View 4 Replies View RelatedFrns
Currently i am working with Sql Server 2005 and i am taking daily backups which is going
append same backup file <DB_NAME>.BAK.
Now i am trying to restore this bkp with a new database name and with 2 days before date
image.When i am trying to do that, sql server is not showing the versions of the backups.
Why? is there any reason for that?
Regards,
franky
hi
i have 2005 express on 2000 sp4
i made a backup devices for the app db
and for every one of the system database.
and with those devices backup and restore.
can i manually configure the system db or i must restore them?
i have an issue where i downloaded and installed v.9.00.2047
while my backups where on v.9.00.1399
tahnks
Hello,We are trying to set up replication between different versions of SQLServer (7 & 2000).This is how the 2 servers are now setup:DB1 - External web-server w/SQL Server 7DB2 - Internal server w/SQL Server 2000REPLICATION SETUPThis is how we need the replication to be set up. They are allTransactional Replications.DISTRIBUTION:This is set up on DB2, which is running on 2000WITH PUBLISHERS ON DB1, AND PULL SUBSCRIPTIONS ON DB2:dbo.Employment_App & dbo.Employ_Jobs (together in one replication)dbo.FeedbackNOTE: This set of replications work some of the time, but make DB1 &DB2 very slow when running. A lot of times, the jobs say "RetryingJob", but they usually will eventually work.WITH PUBLISHERS AND PUSH SUBSCRIPTIONS ON DB2:dbo.Jobsdbo.Releasesdbo.SearchNOTE: This set of replications used to work when DB1 & DB2 both ran onSQL Server 7 with 2000 Enterprise Manager's. But since we moved thedata to an internal server (DB2) that runs on 2000, it doesn't work atall.We've researched the problem, and found an article by MS called"Replication Between Different Versions of SQL Server" athttp://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...plimpl_4joy.aspthat states that this setup should be possible (on Combination 3 forTransactional Replications).But it's not working at all. Are there some steps that we need tocheck to have replication setup between 2 servers running on differentversions of SQL Server (7 & 2000)? Any & all help & advice isappreciated. Thanks.KWilliams
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was wondering if any of you guys can kindly help me in finding allthe different versions of MSDE 2000 that came out since it's firstrelease. I expected to find something similar like Sun's archive(http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html) for MSDE 2000 toobut failed to find after a few hours of browsing at the MicrosoftDownload Center (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/...displaylang=en).They seem more into promoting their new MSDE 2000 Release A for thetime being but nothing much about the previous versions of MSDE toserve my product testing purposes.All I need is a complete list of different versions of MSDE 2000 withdownloadable links.Thanks in advance.IzzY
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello,I've got installed Win 2003 SBS Premium with the SQL Server 2000 on a servermachine. It works almost fine, except the application which uses the SQLServer. The main part of the application runs (since the last update) fine,but other tools of that application (database import and the databasemanager for check and rebuild) doesn't. They hang up or kill the database.Our software developer says that these problems are in correlation with theserver os. But there won't be any problem if we install Win 2000 Server andadd an additional SQL Server 2000.Finally my question is: Are there any differences between the SQL Server2000 Versions, which are sold (a) as a single product, (b) as part of theWin 2003 SBS Premium package and (c) as part of other Server versions?Thanks in Advance,Martin
View 6 Replies View Related
Hi Guys,
I need to detect what version/ or versions of SQL Server are installed on a machine before I can install my software. I am currently looking for SQL Server 2000 / SQL Server 2005 /SQL Server Express Edition & SQL Server 2008 CTP (for the time). How do I find this out. Is SQL-DMO the way forward or should this be some WMI script. I would appreciate any pointers/scripts etc.
I have read a lot of people mentioning using @@version from a query window but as I need the software to do this on first start up can this work for all versions
Thanks in advance
It looks like 3.5 is the most current version of SSCE. Does this version support stored procedures? Are there plans for a new version of SSCE with Sql Server 2008? Will that version support stored procedures? Thanks!
View 3 Replies View RelatedDo you find that there is a big difference between the different
versions of SQL server (6.5, 7, 2000, 2005) as is between Microsoft
programming languages (VB.4, VB5, VB6, .Net and now .Net 2)
Or is the difference in SQL server minimal and very small compared to the programming languages I mentioned.
Thanks a lot
As usual, I'm thinking in terms of Sql2k-dts and...
I am learning SQL Server 2005 Express, and want to use the Northwind data base as used in many code examples. I wanted to attach the Northwind data base via SQL Management Studio, but cannot find a Northwind.mdf file.
When I do a search using 'Northwind', I see there are already a couple of different versions of Northwind already loaded. One appears to be associated with SQL Server Mobile Edition (Samples folder) and another seems to be associated with Visual Studio 8SDKv2.0Quickstart.
Can I use one of these existing Northwind databases (none have .mdf extention) for SQL Server 2005 or do I need to download yet another version?
I have sql server 2000 developer, sql server 2005 (workgroup, standard and enterprise), express and compact 3.5
and i need to test 2000, 2005 express and a full version of 2005 and compact all on the same machine.
Has anyone done something like this and are there any issues with this?
i have seen some threads about 2000 and 2005 being fine as long as one is a default instance and one is a named instance. Would i be able to do the same with say express being the default instance and then 2000 and 2005 both having named instances? And is there a particular order i should install? I already have 2005 express as the default instance and compact installed already.
Thank you
Jeff