I am attempting to install SQL Server 2005 on a Laptop with Windows 2003 Standard Edition.
The installation fails and the File Summary.txt has the following entries:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 9.00.1399.06 ============================== OS Version : Microsoft Windows Server 2003 family, Standard Edition Service Pack 2 (Build 3790) Time : Fri Nov 30 09:36:53 2007
Machine : SAPDEMO Product : Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English) Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Successful Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLSupport_1.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Machine : SAPDEMO Product : Microsoft SQL Server Native Client Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Successful Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLNCLI_1.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Machine : SAPDEMO Product : Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Successful Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SqlWriter_1.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Machine : SAPDEMO Product : Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English) Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Successful Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLSupport_2.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Machine : SAPDEMO Product : Microsoft SQL Server Native Client Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Successful Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLNCLI_2.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Machine : SAPDEMO Product : Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Books Online (English) Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Successful Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_BOL_1.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Machine : SAPDEMO Product : SQLXML4 Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Successful Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLXML4_1.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQL Server Setup failed. For more information, review the Setup log file in %ProgramFiles%Microsoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGSummary.txt.
The BI Survey is the largest independent survey of BI technology users worldwide. (It used to be known as the OLAP survey, but has expanded to cover a broader array of BI technologies.) The survey analyzes people's buying decisions, BI implementation cycles and business results achieved.
The BI Survey is strictly independent --- they ask vendors like us to ask our customers like you to participate, but we don't have any other involvement --- except closely reading the results, of course. The Survey will send all participants a summary of the full survey results and place them in a drawing for ten $50 Amazon vouchers.
You can complete the survey on-line by following these links:
English version - website: http://www.eu-survey.com/webprod/cgi-bin/askiaext.dll?Action=StartSurvey&T1=BI&lan=1&lin=20
German version: http://www.eu-survey.com/webprod/cgi-bin/askiaext.dll?Action=StartSurvey&T1=BI&lan=2&lin=67
Current set-up: three node cluster running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition SP2 with two instances of SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition SP2.
Virtual node 1: Standard Edition, default instance, Database Engine only
Virtual node 2: Standard Edition, named instance, Database Engine, Analysis Services and Integration Services
Physical node A: Prefered node for virtual node 1
Physical node B: Failover node for both virtual node 1 and 2 (thus having two installations of Standard Edition)
Physical node C: Prefered node for virtual node 2
We started off with this set-up because there was no need for Enterprise features, and SQL 2005 supports failover clustering with two nodes in Standard Edition. Saved a bundle of cash, so everybody's happy. Now we need to run a solution on virtual node 2 that requires Enterprise features in Analysis and Integration Services, so an edition upgrade is required on virtual node 2. I have done some research and found several edition upgrade examples, but none that match the above scenario. We are running production on these machines, so I can't risk experimenting with command line options, I have to be right the first time.
Is it possible to mix two editions of SQL Server 2005 in one cluster? Can I upgrade virtual node 2 to Enterprise but leave virtual node 1 at Standard? What procedure do I have to follow to upgrade all three components of virtual node 2 to Enterprise Edition on both physical node B and C?
I've installed Windows 2003 SP2 in a stand-alone cluster (will be adding a second node later). I'm now installing SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition 64-bit extended and would like to have the "Create a SQL Server Failover Cluster" box to not be grayed out. Even when I check the "SQL Server Database Services" box, it still has the cluster box grayed out.
In short, does the €śTransfer SQL Server Objects Task€? support distributed transactions?
In trying to use a €śTransfer SQL Server Objects Task€? in a container using a transaction on the container. The task is set to support the transaction. It is setup to copy table data from several tables from a non-domain server (sql server 2000) to a domain-based server (sql server 2005). I get an error stating, €śThis task can not participate in a transaction€?.
I am wondering if it means exactly what it says €“ this task in SSIS can€™t participate at all. Or does it mean that it won€™t in this scenario for some reason. I attempted a simple copy of data from mssql 2005 to mssql 2005 (same server) and the task still failed). MSDTC appears to be running properly on my machine and such (I can do a simple distributed transaction across linked server to the 2000 server in Query Analyzer (QA)). Also, MSDTC appears to be working on both servers with distributed transaction query tests in QA.
Here€™s the error info€¦
SSIS package "Development BusinessContacts and Products Migration.dtsx" starting. Information: 0x4001100A at Copy BusinessContacts Data: Starting distributed transaction for this container. Error: 0xC002F319 at Copy BusinessContacts database table data 1, Transfer SQL Server Objects Task: This task can not participate in a transaction. Task failed: Copy BusinessContacts database table data 1 Information: 0x4001100C at Copy BusinessContacts database table data 1: Aborting the current distributed transaction. Information: 0x4001100C at Copy BusinessContacts Data: Aborting the current distributed transaction. SSIS package "Development BusinessContacts and Products Migration.dtsx" finished: Failure. The program '[4700] Development BusinessContacts and Products Migration.dtsx: DTS' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
During the installation of Adding node to a SQL Server failover cluster(On passive node) getting error like.. The MOF compiler could not connect with the WMI server. This is either because of a semantic error such as an incompatibility with the existing WMI repository or an actual error such as the failure of the WMI server to start.We  run the below commands but didn’t get any resolution & got the same above error .  1<sup>st</sup> Method…
1. Open console command (Run->CMD with administrator privileges).Â
2. net stop winmgmtÂ
3. Rename folder %windir%System32WbemRepository to other one, for backup purposes (for example _Repository).Â
4. net start winmgmt
2<sup>nd</sup>Â Method..
1. Disable and stop the WMI service.
a) Command : - sc config winmgmt start= disabled
b. Command : - Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â net stop winmgmt
I am in the process of moving databases from a SQL 2005 Standard version to a 2-node 2014 cluster.All of my 2005 databases back up successfully.They all restore without issue except for one database that has a full text catalog. I get this message
Msg 7610, Level 16, State 1, Line 2 Access is denied to "fileStoragedataMSSQLSERVERFullTextCatalog", or the path is invalid. Msg 3156, Level 16, State 50, Line 2 File 'sysft_FTCatalog' cannot be restored to 'fileStoragedataMSSQLSERVERFullTextCatalog'. Use WITH MOVE to identify a valid location for the file. Msg 3119, Level 16, State 1, Line 2 Problems were identified while planning for the RESTORE statement. Previous messages provide details. Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 2 RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
[code]....
I went as far as giving the folder full access to everyone temporarily and received the same error.
Can I build a cluster by adding the cluster service, then the SQL instances, then add the other nodes and their passive SQL instances?I would lean to building the cluster first, the add the SQL instances.
I'm very new to SQL servers. We're running SQL 6.5-SP4 and have three applications using different databases on the server (NT4-SP3).
App 1. Written in PowerBuilder using 32bit DB_LIB, NWLink IPX/SPX. App 2. Written in VFP 5.0a using ODBC32, NWLink IPX/SPX App 3. Written in VB using ODBC16, NWLink IPX/SPX
Something happens, which freezes all 32bit connections and prevents any other 32bit connects. Which means I can't get Enterprise Manager to connect! This does not affect the ODBC16 clients?!?!
So far the only way, I have found, to clear and fix is to get all 32bit users out of their apps and the server becomes available again. There's got to be something to prevent this, any ideas? Is there a way to trace this to find the culprit?
I am going to test the migration of a 32bit SQL 2005 database to a SQL 2005 x64bit database server. Has anyone tried this? What can I expect? Will it work? Is there anythi I need to do?
I was just going to detach the 32bit DB, copy yhe files to the 64 bit server and reattach it.
I'm sure this has been discussed in the forums before, but I'll ask anyways. I'm replacing our GP server next year to one that will run SQL2k5 64-bit. The current server is only capable of 32bit SQL. I know with some databases changing from x64 to x32 is a bad idea...will SQL Server support it?
Windows 2003 R2 SP2 (32bit) SQL 2005 SP2 4gigs of Hot-Add RAM WSUS 3.0 SP1 SCCM 2007
I've had nothing but issues on this server until I came across the articles about using /PAE in the boot.ini to correct the 4gig RAM issues, then read that /PAE can corrupt your database.
I then enabled AWE on the SQL 2005 server using the RAM range of 1gig-4gigs.
Since this, I am seeing errors in the Application Event log on the server that states SQL is not ready to accept client connections.
So, before I go any further with this build, it this something I should be concerned about ?
Having looked at the complexities of transforming data from Oracle in a 64Bit Environment to SQL 2005, will SSIS 2008 run nativley in 64Bit. I understand that SSIS 2005 ran in 32Bit, even when in a 64Bit environment, causing great issues in accessing Oracle. Oracle released an update to compensate for this, however can someone please clarify whether SQL 2008 will have the same issues, or will SSIS 2008 be able to speak with Oracle on a 64Bit level. Regards
I have following script which i am planning to run to drop all non-clustered primary keys on a database and then created as clustered. I am using someone else's script so don't know how to modify this. Some of primary key columns are used in references in other tables.
is there anyway i can drop the existing primary keys and using their original script then create again as clustered including restoring all foreign and reference keys and unique or no unique.
DECLARE @table NVARCHAR(512), @tablename NVARCHAR(512), @sql NVARCHAR(MAX), @sql2 NVARCHAR(MAX), @sql3 NVARCHAR(MAX), @column NVARCHAR(MAX); DECLARE @indexname NVARCHAR(512); SELECT name As 'Table'
We are planning to change all IPs of PRODUCTION Failover Cluster Setup. In my cluster setup ... we have 2 Physical Nodes with windows-2008, Roles are MSDTC and SQL-2008R2.
IP change for:
1. Both Nodes(Physical) 2. MSDTC 3. SQL Server 4. windows ClusterÂ
So Almost... All IPs are going to change.
Im DBA here, I need to take care of SQL cluster and MSDTC. But I haven't performed this activity before.So I'm worrying about Impacts and consequences of this change. steps how should I perform this activity.
I m swagatika and working on a s/w company.I am facing some problem in MS SqlServer2005.
my problem is:-
My project is running on SqlServer2005 which is 32 bit support. But i want to change my project on SqlServer2005 which will be support to 64 bit . What are the steps i follow to change 32 bit to 64 bit.
This may seem like a completely foolish question, but is there any issue in using the 32bit workstation components (on XP) to connect to the 64bit server-side components? New to SQL2K5 and never had any issues using the 2K workstation/server components together.
Just curious if it's possible, and supported, to upgrade SQL 2005 from32bit to 64bit. This is on top of Windows 2003 64bit. Trying to getthe proper supported config for OM2k7 without blowing everything away.Thanks,JDP
Hi all, I've got two VLDBs on 64bit hardware platform + 64Bit-W2003K Std R2 + 64Bit SQL2005 Std Edition. If I set this guy up as the Principal, can I have the standby/member on 32Bit HW + 32Bit W2003 Std + 32Bit SQL2005?
Unfortunately, this provider seems to behave different to the one i use in 32bit :
Lets say i have a stored procedure"
create spName as
select * from mytable
when i execute the following
<%sqlstr = "exec spname"
set myRecSet = CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset")
myRecSet.open SQLStr, myConn
response.write(myRecSet(0)) %>
it gives the first value of the first row with the Connection to a 32bit SQL-Server
but myRecSet seems to be empty on my 64bit SQL Server the response.write leads to an error message.
As far as i understand this, the provider used when connecting to a 32bit Server returns the records selected by the last row of the stored procedure into the recordset, but the provider when connecting to a 64bit server does not return these results.
What can i do, if i dont want to rewrite my asp-programming. I hope somebody has the correct naming / syntax for an connection string which allows me to connect my asp-application to the 64bit SQLServer which behaves like the "old" one for 32bit.
I hope my comments are clear enough - english is obviously not my mother-tongue - and somebody can give me a hint.
I installed SQL 2005 on a 64bit server. Can I still use enterprise studio on a 32bit client machine?
The install CD's are 64bit and when I try to find the enterprise studio to install on my 32bit machine i get an error. Is there a place to download the 32bit enterprise studio? What are my options here?
There is no SQL Agent forum so if this isn't the correct place please move this post.
Windows 2003 R2 x64 with SQL Server x64.
One of the steps in a SQL job I have setup requires me to run an exe. I can run this exe from the command line or by double-clicking it on this same server but when running it from a SQL job it does not run, the job just has the status 'executing' but does not do anything. I have enabled xp_cmdshell. I have also tried calling a bat file which then runs the exe and I have tried calling the bat file with SysWOW64cmd.exe. Same problem.
It seems to me the the operating system recognises the 32bit exe and runs it in that context but the SQL Agent thread keeps trying to run it as a 64bit exe and hence never gets anywhere. (My best guess)
Is there a way to force SQL job/steps to run an exe or bat file in a 32bit thread? Any other ideas.
