ASP.net Page Connection To SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition Failure (across Domains/networks)
Oct 4, 2007
Hi all,
I have a production website at Godaddy and an ASP.net 2.0 page that successfull connects to a SQL 2005 instance provided by Godaddy using SQL authentication(User ID/Password). The Godaddy database has become too small (200MB limit) and the plan is to use the SQL Server 2005 standard edition at my office. In other words, I want to host my own SQL server and keep the front-end at Godaddy.
The ASP.net test page at Godaddy generates the basic connection errors when attempting to connect to my SQL server at the office. This error has several variations depending on how the connection string is configured:
An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: TCP Provider, error: 0 - A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)
In this case the connection string is:
Data Source=xxx.xxx.xx.xxx,1433; Network Library=DBMSSOCN; Initial Catalog=Test; User ID=xxx; Password=xxx"
I've embedded this connection string directly into the ASP.net test page in order to make this page independent of the web.config file.
My MS SQL server is on a Small Bussiness Server 2003 with Sharepoint and Remote Workplace running, and this machine is behind a linksys router, and Routing and Remote Access is running in place of windows firewall.
I've openned ports TCP 1433 and UDP 1434 on the router and Routing and Remote Access. Telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxxx 1433 connects successfull, and the SQL log shows listening on 1433. I don't know if telnet is telling me that there is successful connection to the port on the router, or if it makes it all the way to the SQL server.
The SQL server is running the default instance MSSQLSERVER. Locally, I am able to connect using SQL 2005 Studio, and I am able to confirm this activity in the SQL log. Since I've openned port 1433, I also see numerous dictionary attacks in the SQL Log. Based on this, remote connectivity is there.
The strange observation is that the SQL log shows no sign of a connection attempt from the ASP.net page. The connection appears to be failing before it reaches the SQL server. I've openned ports in the Linksys router and the NAT/Firewall the same way I've openned them for Sharepoint and Remote Workplace.
I also found that when I move the ASP.net test page to another ISP, then the SQL connection that worked from the Godaddy website, is no longer able to connect. An explanation of this would also be very helpful to me.
Is there something that needs to be configured to expose the SQL server to ASP.net pages that is different from remote access?
Does IIS need to somehow be involved?
Is there something in Small Business Server 2003 that could be interferring with ASP.net page requests to the SQL server?
Do I need to run my machine as a web server to make this work?
Any help with this configuration would be greatly appreciated.
View 9 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 8, 2008
Hi,
I€™ve developed a BI system using the SQL Server 2005 Developer€™s Edition.
SSAS, SSIS and SSRS have been added to a SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition Server in preparation for delivering the developed database to this live environment.
So I am able to connect directly to the Database Engine, SSAS, SSIS and SSRS successfully from the actual SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition box which is sat on a Windows 2003 Server operating system.
However when I launch SQL Server Management Studio from a desk top PC which is connected to the SQL Server Standard Edition box I can€™t connect to either SSIS or SSRS, however I can connect to the Database Engine and it also seems that I can connect to SSAS OK.
I am using Windows Authentication where the I used a SQL Server account which exists with €œsysadmin€? permissions and this SQL Server account has the same login name as the Windows Server 2003 desktop login.
What do I do next please?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2008
Hi
-I have istalled sql server 2005 standard edition , I want to install sql server 2005 enterprise edition on the same machine.
Is it possible? I have Microsoft windows server 2003 SP2 and 1GB RAM.
I want to use partition function with the enterprise edition, will the trial version of sql server work for me?
-If I have already created a database and tables using the standard edition, will I be able to access and use the database using the installed trial version or will I have to start a fresh creating a new database?
- Is it possible to access the same database with any of the installed versions?
BTW, I am prety new to sql server and databases , I am trying to learn by myself
Thanks
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2006
Hello!M a newbie.. I just want to know, that wots the difference b/w SQL Server Standard Edition and Express Edition.?And can I use Visual Studio 2005 (Professional Edition) with SQL Server Express Edition.?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2006
Dear All,We have a database which contains many tables which have millions ofrecords. When We attach the database with MS SQL Server 2005 StandardEdition Server and run some queries (having joins, filters etc.) thenthey take very long time to execute while when We execute same querieson Enterprise Edition then they run 10 times faster than on standardedition.Our database does not use any features which are present in EnterpriseEdition and not present in Standard Edition. We want to know what arethe differences between Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition forperformance. Why should we go for Enterprise Edition when StandardEdition has all the features required.We are presently using evaluation versions of SQL Server 2005 Standardand Enterprise Editions.Thanks and regards,Nishant Sainihttp://www.simplyjava.com
View 23 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2008
I am attempting to upgrade a 2005 Standard Edtion to Enterprise Edition. This is a default instance. All components are upgraded successfully except the Database Engine. I receive the following error:
SQL Server Setup has encountered the following problem: [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]The certificate cannot be dropped because one or more entities are either signed or encrypted using it.. To continue, correct the problem, and then run SQL Server Setup again.
This installation does not have encryption enabled, so I do not undersand the error or how to correct it.
After rebooting the SQL instance appears to be upgraded to Enterprise, but it cannot be upgraded to SP2.
Thanks,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2008
I'd like to upgrade from my current SQL Server version: 09.00.3042 (Workgroup edition that comes with SBS upgrade) to the standard edition that I've just purchased. I've attempted to run setup.exe SKUUPGRADE=1 from the command prompt and it just tells me that there's nothing new to install.
I don't really want to uninstall the current installation just to do something that shouldn't be complicated to do, upgrading software versions should not be a difficult process.
Does anybody have any experience with this?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2006
As an ISV, I want to certify my product on Standard Edition. I am using Developer Edition everywhere. Is there a way I can do the certification using the Developer Edition, or do I need to obtain/purchase a copy of the Standard Edition?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2007
Hello,
I have been unable to create a replication from an SQL Server 2005 standard edition database to remote SQL Server 2005 Express Edition. The remote express edition is on a Virtual Private Server we are leasing from a hosting company. The name of the remote DB is similar to vs572.si-vs572.com. I can connect to this with SQL server authentication through Management Studio and also with SSIS. But, I have been unable to create a push subscription (I have tried a test push subscription with the same publication to a local SQL Express server here in our office and this works fine).
Here is the error message: SQL Server Replication requires the actual server name to make a connection to the server. Connections through server alias, IP address, or any other alternate name are not supported. Specify the actual server name, 'VS572SQLEXPRESS'.
The hosting company had originally installed a shared SQL server which would not support replication. They then installed SQL Express edition and I was hoping this would allow us to run a replication.
I tried to connect to VS572SQLEXPRESS with out any luck. I check the remote connections, made sure replication was installed, etc., but no luck.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you,
Albert
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2008
I tried to download PerformancePoint Server Trial Version to ther server today and I got to the configuration point of the Analysis Services Setting, and when I clicked next to proceed with the configuration I got a popup error message:
"Microsoft Analysis Server must be Evaluation, Developer or Enterprise Edition".
Now I have SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition Disc (Bought it with Visual Studio 2005) but on the server I have SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition, if I try to run the sql server developer Edition disc, I use the wizard download and it seems that the download is going through the SQL Server entire download, it's like I'm re-downloading SQL Server all over again.
Does that seem right?
what is the best approach to work around this probelm?
I appreciate any help
Thanks
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2007
Hi,
I would like to find out if there is any way to upgrade SQL Server 2000 (Ent) to 2005 (STD)
The Instance has many logins and jobs etc and I dont want to loose those
A document or some advice on how to go about it would help
Thanks
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2007
Hi,
We have replication setup on a sql server 2000. We encountered issue that the distribution agent goes down (distrib.exe stop running) in the event of network connection broken. We would like to know:
is this the expected result that the distribution agent will go down in the event of communication failure between the distribution server and subscriber server?
if not, is there a way to programmatically control and restart the agent?
Is there any sp in SQL server which can monitor the replication communication error message?
is there any sp in SQL server which can be run to restart the agent?
For the best practice, what do you think we can do to achieve an €˜event-driven€™ kind of mechanism so when an communication breaks, the agent can be restarted by the triggered event (or at least a simple way to automatically restart)?
Thanks
Bill
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
I have the option of buying a new copy of MS SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition for Itanium based systems, however will this also work on the following spec server
2.8Ghz P4
1Ghz Ram
120Gb IDE hard drive
with windows 2003 standar edition operating system
The part number for the stanard edition of SQL is 228-04025
If it helps you can call me on +44 (0) 1285 644091
Thanks
Simon
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2008
I'm getting some conflicting information , regarding sql 2005 Standard Edition licensing for multi instancing.
If you have multiple instances of SQL 2005 Standard Edition on one Server, do you need to pay a server license for every Instance or just the one Server license?
Jack Vamvas
--------------------
Search IT jobs from multiple sources- http://www.ITjobfeed.com
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2006
The Microsoft OLEDB provider for DB2 (DB2OLEDB) is available in the "Feature Pack for SQL Server 2005 €“ April 2006." The installation routine, however, will only install on the enterprise edition or the developer edition. Is the DB2OLEDB provider not available for SQL Server 2005 standard edition?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
Hi, I have the option of buying MS SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition IA64 with 5 CLT part number 228-04025, however will it work on the following spec server;
2.8Ghz P4
1Gb Ram
120Gbide hard drive
running Windows 2003 standard edition
If it helps you can call me on +44 (0) 1285 644091 or simon@310k.co.uk
Thanks
Simon
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2008
Good day!
I installed SQL 2005 Standard Edition in my XP machine, but I don't have any instances. When I use Add/Remove programs, and click Change in Microsoft SQL Server 2005, it says that "No instances have been installed. To add a new instance, click the Add component hyperlink", but I cannot see the hyperlink. Why was the default instance never installed? How do I install a new instance?
Thanks.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2007
I have a SQL Server 2005 evaluation that has already been installed and setup on a server. I believe it originally had a 180 day eval. There have been numerous databases and users added as well as maintenance plan created...
The eval was put on the machine as an interim solution while waiting for paper work and order processiing things to happen. All the paperwork and ordering... have been completed and I now have the real SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition license key ....
I am very new to SQL Server and need to determine ...
1. Can I update the eval copy to become permanently licensed?
2. Would I want to upgrade the eval to permanent? Will I lose any capabilities by keeping the current eval setup?
If it is reasonable to keep the eval setup
3. How do I go about entering the license key to make it permanent?
If it is necessary to install the new Standard Edition...
4. How do I install it while maintaining the already defined databases, data, users, maintenance plan...
Thanks in advance for any and all help.
Chris
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2008
Hi everyoneHere's the situation:I'm just a liitle confused on how Sql Server 2005 manages permissions.What does it use and where : the computer name or the user name?Basically, where does it get the server name from? And why does SqlServer Express Edition use the server name "somethingSQLEXPRESS" ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2006
I have a Question about this Version!
Is this true that only one Person can query the Server at the same time? ( 1CAL Lizense)
I wrote a .Net Appllication and now the Appllication need acces to the Server to Query Tables.
In the "Rush Hour" it is possible that more than 100 Person make Querys from that Application to the SQL Server at the same time.
I don´t understand the CAL Lizens because the SQLServer Express allows up to 20 connection!?
The SQLExpress is for free and allow more connections than a paid Version?
Or is a difference between connection ( through the Appllication) and Connection through the Management Studio ?
Thanks for HELP!!
Pseudocode
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2006
I have an embedded pc which runs windows ce 4.2. I have created an amplication which use sdf file 2.0 version. So i want to copy this database into Desktop PC and open it with Sql Server 2005. Should i upgrade this database? Will i have problems after upgrade?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2007
I am planning to work with replication topic and i have a problem with it.
I have installed a SQL server 2005 standard edition.When i try creating a new publication it comes out with this error
"Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio is unable to access replication components because replication is not installed on this instance of sql server.
for information about installing replication,see installing replication in sql server books online
Additional information:
Execute permission denied on object 'sp_MS_replication_installed",database'master',owner'dbo'.
(Microsoft SQL server ,Error:229)
I have tried inserting the CD and reinstalling it.but didnt work.
When i tried to Remove sql server from control panel add/remove programs it shows me the following components to be deleted.but then even after restarting my machine i find everything in start->all programs.
what do i need to do??
Please help me.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2008
Hi Experts,
Can you tell me the procedure how to install SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition with CAL licensing?
This is very very urgent,
Your help would be appreciated..
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2008
Hi,
I need to install Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition 64-bit running on Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition 64-bit. Instead of installing it on every single machine I thought of installing it on one of them, updating it with all the necessary updates, creating a ghost image of the updated system and database and copying the image on all the other machines.
After doing it I however need to update both the system and SQL Server license keys. And there comes my question whether one can change the SQL Server license key after the installation??
Thanks in advance
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2007
Hello,
When I try to install SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition, Windows XP SP2, setup fails.
Please help!!!
This is log file:
..............................
Loaded DLL:
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapDbgHelp.dll
Version:
6.5.3.7
MSI (s) (98:E8) [12:19:07:890]: Leaked MSIHANDLE (6010) of type 790531 for thread 2260
MSI (s) (98:E8) [12:19:07:890]: Leaked MSIHANDLE (6009) of type 790540 for thread 2260
MSI (s) (98:E8) [12:19:07:890]: Leaked MSIHANDLE (6008) of type 790541 for thread 2260
MSI (s) (98:E8) [12:19:07:890]: Leaked MSIHANDLE (5973) of type 790541 for thread 2260
MSI (s) (98:E8) [12:19:07:890]: Leaked MSIHANDLE (5970) of type 790531 for thread 2260
MSI (s) (98:E8) [12:19:07:890]: Note: 1: 2769 2: Write_sqlLocalServers.D20239D7_E87C_40C9_9837_E70B8D4882C2 3: 5
Info 2769.The installer has encountered an unexpected error. The error code is 2769. Custom Action Write_sqlLocalServers.D20239D7_E87C_40C9_9837_E70B8D4882C2 did not close 5 MSIHANDLEs.
MSI (s) (98:2C) [12:19:07:890]: Machine policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (98:2C) [12:19:07:890]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionInstallerRollbackScripts 3: 2
Action ended 12:19:07: Write_sqlLocalServers.D20239D7_E87C_40C9_9837_E70B8D4882C2. Return value 3.
MSI (s) (98:2C) [12:19:07:890]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionInstallerRollbackScripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (98:2C) [12:19:07:890]: No System Restore sequence number for this installation.
MSI (s) (98:2C) [12:19:07:890]: Unlocking Server
Action ended 12:19:07: INSTALL. Return value 3.
Property(S): ProductCode = {28B22773-100E-4AF2-A1C9-2F2EA8A35844}
Property(S): ProductLanguage = 1033
------------------------------
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2008
Hi,
Has anyone tried an in-place upgrade from SQL Server 2005 Developer to Standard Edition?
It apears to be a valid upgrade path according to this:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143393.aspx
Is it just a case of changing the registered licensing info? (I presume all the functionality for Standard exists in the Developer Edition) Or is it a reinstall job?
I want to use a dev license for development on the server, then once its finished, just leave it in place on the box and upgrade the licensing to standard edition. (The client doesn't yet have a Standard License, but does have a Dev License - and wants me to start right away!)
If its going to boil down to having to do a full re-installation then I should get a Standard license from the start, if its just a minor license key change, then I can use a Dev license straight away!
Pls. help. Thank you!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2008
I am looking at running SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition in a clustered environment (2 nodes) and am not sure if the 4 processor limit applies to the number of processors per node or the number of processors it will run on in the entire cluster. Could someone please clarify this for me?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2007
Hi,
I'm having trouble finding the optimum memory settings for SQL Server 2005. I have 4 instances running on a macine with 8 dual-core processors and 18GB of RAM. I have tried the following memory settings so far:
No maximum - one instance used about 12GB of RAM so then the others struggled
Maximum of 4GB each (2GB left for Windows) - meant that 3 instances could be using 1GB each and then another at 4GB and needing more whilst 9GB sat unused.
Minimum of 2GB each - one instance would use up 10GB and then never give any back to the other instances.
I also find that setting a maximum then just causes a high amount of paging. What I would like to do is have each instance use a minimum amount, say 1GB, and then have each instance use a maximum of 13GB (3GB for other 3 instances running at a minimum level and 2GB for Windows). This 13GB should then be released and allocated to another instance when necessary, assuming it is no longer all being used. I do not want paging to occur if an instance reaches 13GB.
How do I go about configuring SQL Server to behave like this? Is it possible?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2008
I am running SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition with SP2 on Windows XP professional. When I check the microsoft documentation, it says that it is not possible to setup multiserver administration in standard edition. Have anyone tried this in Standard edition.
Rajakanna
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2007
What happens when you install a SQLEXPRESS instance on a machine that already has SQL Server 2005? Will the SQLEXPRESS still run in the limited mode or will it sense that an full standard version of SQL Server 2005 is already present and just "upgrade" itself?
On the otherhand, how do I "upgade" an existing instance of SQLEXPRESS to a full version of SQL Server 2005 standard edition without uninstalling and installing the standard edition. If I have both the instances then will the SQLEXPRESS be freed from its limits?
Thanks,
Vikram
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2007
I tried to upgrade an Express edition 2005 to Standard Edition 2005. I did remember to use the command prompt setup parameter to allow the upgrade but still the option to upgrade is disabled. Can upgrade from express to standard?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2007
I've installed this applicaton many times, however, while setting up a new virtual server for TFS, the person installing the server piece didn't choose the appropriate security mode to use when logging in. Due to this, we attempted to reinstall the management studio and the installation keeps failing. We've hit many challenges up and includig using the original cd's instead of an install from a network location. When attempting to install it fails, when we put the error into help, there isn't any help on the topic. We have managed to install everything except XML and management studio. The studio I can go without, but TFS needs the XML piece. Any ideas?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2008
I have one server hosting an ASP.NET application. It will be running 2005 Standard Edition.
I don't really understand which licensing model I need. Obviously processor licensing would work, but at a hefty price!
The web application and SQL Server are on the same machine, and no other machines will be querying the database. The only 'users' are the people who visit the website (both internal and external users).
Can someone help me properly determine the most cost efficient licening model to use?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related