I created sqlexpress database and .net app, everything was fine on my local machine.
When I moved the app to my server, I detached the database with SMSS express, moved the MDF file over along with the app files and I attached to the database with SSMS to make sure everything went over ok but when I try to open a table I get the error,
SQL Execution Error
Executed statement: Select x, x, x, x,x from tblFile
Error source: .Net SqlClient Data Provider
Error Message: Access to table dbl.tblFile is blocked because the signature is not valid.
I can open the stored procedures fine by choosing modify from the context menu.
Had some big problems with my SQL Server 2008 R2 SP1 during the last maintenance running on Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise ( upgraded from Standard). I'm getting the following error,
"SQL Server blocked access to procedure 'dbo.sp_sqlagent_has_server_access' of component 'Agent XPs' because this component is turned off as part of the security configuration for this server. A system administrator can enable the use of 'Agent XPs' by using sp_configure. For more information about enabling 'Agent XPs', see "Surface Area Configuration" in SQL Server Books Online."
I did a google search and found others with the problem but the resolution isn't working for me. I ran the following commands, heck I ran them multiple times. No errors come back running these commands. But the same error keeps happening, I even restart the service and then the server again.
sp_configure 'show advanced options', 1; GO RECONFIGURE; GO sp_configure 'Agent XPs', 1; GO RECONFIGURE GO
The msdb got too big for the disk it was on. I had maintenance plans to clear out the all of histories but I didn't think of the mail items. When I finally saw this problem I tried clearing them out using the stored procedures only with it finally failing because the transaction log got full. Since we didn't have a lot of jobs scheduled I decided to just recreate the msdb. So I scheduled a maintenance window, download SQL Server Service Pack 3.
my steps are as follows: ->diff backup of msdb ->stopped the service and started it again with: NET START MSSQLSERVER /T3608 ->detached msdb with: SQLCMD -E -SP-SRVR-SQL-01 -dmaster -Q"EXEC sp_detach_db msdb" ->moved it off the drive ->restarted the service without any startup flags ->recreated msdb with: SQLCMD -E -SP-SRVR-SQL-01 -i"D:Microsoft SQL ->ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLInstallinstmsdb.sql" -o"D:Microsoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLInstallinstmsdb62715.out"
I looked at the log file and there were no actual error messages so I applied service pack 3 and restarted server after it installed, was actually prompted to restart. In my tests I was never prompted to restart the server.Now I never started the agent service after recreating the msdb database since I knew it wasn't on the same version. I just went directly to the latest SP. Our applications are running fine but now I cant do scheduled backups.
I have written a stored procedure to list out all tables in whichrows or the table itself is locked. The only information I amnot able to get is the time when the lock occurred. The way Iwant is that if I run the procedure it should show all lockson a table which are at least 5 or x seconds old. This way I canavoid momentary locks on a table which go away after few seconds.Which table and column of master database has that information?Thanks.--email id is bogus
I then try to run the same app from the client computer, it gives me:
Login failed for user 'LAPTOPGuest'.
After looking up the web for solution, I found that I can test the connection from the HOST computer in this way:
C:Documents and Settingskit>sqlcmd -E -S laptopsqlexpress 1> 2>
The test is successful
Now I run the same command on the CLIENT computer
C:Documents and SettingsKit>sqlcmd -E -S laptopsqlexpress Msg 18456, Level 14, State 1, Server LAPTOPSQLEXPRESS, Line 1 Login failed for user 'LAPTOPGuest'.
Now I can sure that from the client computer it cannot make a connection to it, then I look at the errorLog from my host computer
2006-08-13 21:41:00.34 Logon Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 11. 2006-08-13 21:41:00.34 Logon Login failed for user 'LAPTOPGuest'. [CLIENT: 192.168.0.5] 2006-08-13 21:45:10.64 Logon Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 11. 2006-08-13 21:45:10.64 Logon Login failed for user 'LAPTOPGuest'. [CLIENT: 192.168.0.5] 2006-08-13 21:48:41.80 Logon Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 11. 2006-08-13 21:48:41.80 Logon Login failed for user 'LAPTOPGuest'. [CLIENT: 192.168.0.5]
Now I know it is actually Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 11.
From this site : http://blogs.msdn.com/sql_protocols/archive/2006/02/21/536201.aspx
11 and 12
Valid login but server access failure
It tells the connection string and SQL Express seem to be set up properly but the server access failed the remote connection
I have previously had SQL Server 2000 installed. I uninstalled SQL 2000 before I install SQL express but somehow the SQL Server Service Manager is still running at startup, and C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server80 and its files are still exist after uninstallation..... Could this be a problem?
The Knowledge base suggestion on "enabling remote connection" is very simple and I do not understand why it is so difficult to me just to make a remote connection test work..... please, I need your help.
Recently, one of my clients began receiving this error. My team gave them sysadmin permissions, but this is terrible practice. I have read into disablying simple file sharing, but I don't even think I have the option to do it. I look in mycomputer > tools > view and don't see any option for this. Besides, the problem just started occuring recently, within the last week. The server is a cluster with veritas clustering and the edition is sql server 2000. Has anybody ever had a problem like this and have a good fix? Thanks for any help in advance... -Kyle
Hi I have created a Client/Server application. The Client connects remotely to the SQL 2005 server using thier unique user name and password.
The client application allows the users to update a form.
I need to add to the database a digital signature for that user when they update that form. This is intended to be a replacement for a physical signature that would appear on a paper form.
Would like to use the digital signature (i.e. PKI) from a smart card to authorize a PDF document. Is it possible to retrieve the PKI from Windows once its read in via the smart card using some sort of C++ or Java API call to apply it to the PDF form?
I am currently developing a project that requires a server level permission for one stored procedure (ALTER ANY LOGIN)
To this effect, I plan to create a certificate, sign the stored procedure with it, import the certificate into the master DB and assign privileges.
I also understand that modification to the code invalidates the signature (after all thats the point of signing something).
But what about user defined functions and stored procedures referenced by the signed procedure? Does SQL server follow the dependancy chain and include referenced procedures in the signature? Or does the privilege assigned to the certificate not apply when the nested procedure is executed?
If this is not the case couldn't a restricted database user just alter a nested stored procedure they have been granted ALTER access to and make themselves SA or something?
So to sum up, do you have to duplicate the functionality of otherwise nested procedures into a certificate signed procedure to protect server security?
I have a user who's spell check always checks her signature - is there a way to prevent this? I know how to stop it on an individual email, but I want every email she creates to automatically NOT check the signiture file.
During merge replication initialization from SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server CE 3.5 on Windows Mobile 5.0
I am getting the following errors:
On Device {"The table name is not valid. [ Token line number (if known) = 1,Token line offset (if known) = 21,Table name = COLLECTION ]"} base {System.SystemException}: {"The table name is not valid. [ Token line number (if known) = 1,Token line offset (if known) = 21,Table name = COLLECTION ]"} HResult: -2147217900 Message: "The table name is not valid. [ Token line number (if known) = 1,Token line offset (if known) = 21,Table name = COLLECTION ]" NativeError: 26100 Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Compact"
{System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeError: The SQL statement failed to execute. If this occurred while using merge replication, this is an internal error. If this occurred while using RDA, then the SQL statement is invalid either on the PULL statement or on the SubmitSQL statement. [ SQL statement = ALTER TABLE [dbo].[COLLECTION] ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_COLLECTION] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [SERIAL_NUMBER], [STORE_CODE], [COLLECT_DATE] )WITH PAD_INDEX , FILLFACTOR = 90 ]} Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Compact"
Server Logged: ... 2008/04/20 20:03:16 Thread=EA0 RSCB=5 Command=SCHK Hr=00000000 SyncCheck responding 0 2008/04/20 20:03:17 Thread=B90 RSCB=5 Command=OPNR Hr=00000000 End Of Data Set 1 2008/04/20 20:03:17 Thread=B90 RSCB=5 Command=OPNR Hr=00000000 Responding to Fetch, bytes = 50259 2008/04/20 20:03:17 Thread=970 RSCB=5 Command=CLOS Hr=00000000 Total Compressed bytes out = 50259 2008/04/20 20:03:17 Thread=970 RSCB=5 Command=CLOS Hr=00000000 Total Uncompressed bytes out = 390254 2008/04/20 20:03:17 Thread=970 RSCB=5 Command=CLOS Hr=00000000 Removing this RSCB 0 2008/04/20 20:03:19 Hr=00000000 Compression Level set to 1 2008/04/20 20:03:19 Hr=80004005 ACK:Error for DistributorSessionID = 80 2008/04/20 20:03:19 Hr=80004005 The SQL statement failed to execute. If this occurred while using merge replication, this is an internal error. If this occurred while using RDA, then the SQL statement is invalid either on the PULL statement or on the SubmitSQL statement. [,,,SQL stateme 28560
The same tables in a different on a different SQL box (test) replicate fine, but on this box (production) they do not. Any idea what would be the difference in the two environments?
I suspect that the "dbo." part in the "alter table" is what it is messing up on... how can I tell SQL CE not to include that schema prefix? Thanks
Why am I getting message "A valid table name is required for in, out, or format options."
I used the syntax from a tutorial about bcp utility. I am trying to create a format file for flat file import and export.
My server instance is "stat-hpsqlexpress"
The database name is "STATRLO"
Owner is "dbo"
Table name is "PM-allactivity-emaillog_042315"
The bcp comand I am trying to run is:
bcp STATRLO.dbo.PM-allactivity-emaillog_042315 format nul -c -t, -f C:databaseActivity_c.fmt -S stat-hpsqlexpress - T
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. SQL Server Version: Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP1) - 11.0.3153.0 (X64) Jul 22 2014 15:26:36 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation Business Intelligence Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.1 <X64> (Build 7601: Service Pack 1)
Yes I know the instance says sqlexpress...it was upgraded.
In the 70-461 objectives it says: Ensure code non regression by keeping consistent signature for procedure, views and function (interfaces); security implications...I think I understand what this means in general. They want us to be able to create a view that will still be able to call the original data even if the table is modified. In other words, the view table shouldn't easily be broken. ie, type a code that does NOT ensure non regression, then change the code so that it does ensure non regression.
create a new Connection Manager by right-clicking in the Connection Managers section of the design area of the screen. Select New OLE DB Connection to bring up the Configure OLE DB Connection Manager dialog box. Click New to open the Connection Manager. In the Provider drop-down list, choose the Microsoft Jet 4.0 OLE DB Provider and click OK. Browse to the Access database file and connection set up---all good!!!
Dataflow task Add an OLE DB Source component Double-click the icon to open the OLE DB Source Editor. Set the OLE DB Connection Manager property to the Connection Manager that I created . Select Table from the Data Access Mode drop-down list. I cannot see the tables set up as set up as pass-through table types to a Oracle 9i db
I have set up a link from ACCESS to a SQL 7.0 database using ODBC (File DSN saved on a shared DRIVE). The link works well only from the workstation where the link was created. But How can I create a link so a group of users can view the linked table in ACCESS without type a password? Any suggestion is appreciated.
We are using SQL server 6.5 and currently have about 100 users connections at a given point in time. The application is Visual Basic 5.0 based and it allows users to create MS Word documents from the application. These documents names are stored in a table which basically acts as a reference table. Every time a document needs to be attached to a record this table is called with an insert/update query. This results in an exclusive page/table lock and ends up into a blocked process. This finally results into a major halt for all the system users.
Manual killing of these blocked processes frees up the resources and brings things back to normal although disruptive to the users.
Any clue as to why the blocked processes are not able to free themsevles up ? Are we missing something in our SQL configuration that will help us with unblocking these processes ?
I get the error message below. Books online doesn't say any more. Can anyone explain? I am the only user connected to the db at the time, no jobs are executing.
Cannot shrink log file 2 (log) because all logical log files are in use.
(1 row(s) affected)
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
I'm running a heavy SELECT query using WITH (NOLOCK). This still causes other processes trying to INSERT in one of the tables to get blocked. I thought the locking hint would prevent from blocking other processes?
I am getting the following error message when I tried installing the 2005 Developer Edition from the MSDN kit. I previously installed the 2005 Express Edition, and it worked just fine, so I thought that the install failed as it was at a lower version than the Express Edition. I uninstalled the SQLExpress Edition, however, when I try to install SQL Server 2005 again, I get the following message:
Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Build version check:
Your upgrade is blocked because the existing component is a later version than the version you are trying to upgrade to. To modify an existing SQL Server component, go to Add or Remove Programs in Control Panel, select the component you would like to modify, and then click Change/Remove.
Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Tools
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Build version check:
Your upgrade is blocked because the existing component is a later version than the version you are trying to upgrade to. To modify an existing SQL Server component, go to Add or Remove Programs in Control Panel, select the component you would like to modify, and then click Change/Remove.
I have also installed Visual Studio NET, and I wonder if some component in the Studio app is holding back the SQL Server install. I have uninstalled all SQL components several times already, and I keep on getting this message.
I have an SQL Server 2005 mirroring config with "High availability". Twice over the past four weeks, the principal server started logging to the event log:
"All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT" I checked the database activity monitor and indeed there were lots of processes in DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT.
The database was totally unresponsive to queries (all got timeouts), and no failover was done.
This are the log entries for all day:
05/04/2008 08:40:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%. 05/04/2008 08:39:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%. 05/04/2008 08:38:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%. 05/04/2008 08:37:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%. 05/04/2008 08:36:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%. 05/04/2008 08:35:44,Server,Unknown,All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT. Process Utilization 0%. 05/04/2008 08:33:49,Server,Unknown,The time stamp counter of CPU on scheduler id 2 is not synchronized with other CPUs. 05/04/2008 03:24:02,Backup,Unknown,Log was backed up. Database: TeleCable<c/> creation date(time): 2007/08/24(13:38:00)<c/> first LSN: 205089:18926:1<c/> last LSN: 209688:18463:1<c/> number of dump devices: 1<c/> device information: (FILE=1<c/> TYPE=DISK: {'\face01f$logbackup'}). This is an informational message only. No user action is required. 05/04/2008 00:00:14,spid24s,Unknown,This instance of SQL Server has been using a process ID of 1700 since 4/9/2008 3:18:54 AM (local) 4/9/2008 1:18:54 AM (UTC). This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
After that, the same entry once per minute.
I restarted the database and everything came to normal.
As you can imagine, the problem is really serious.
Should I forget about mirroring? Anyone has experienced something similar?
I have a stored procedure which generates the next sequence number... it uses SERIALIZABLE Option. procs look something like below..
begin SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE BEGIN TRANSACTION
Sequence generating statement...
COMMIT TRANSACTION set @NextSequenceValue = @NextSequenceValue Return @NextSequenceValue end
For some reason when i call the proc with below parameters to get next sequence number.. its hungs up..
declare @NextSequenceValue int set @NextSequenceValue = 0 exec spGetNextSequence 19, 'LotSequence', @NextSequenceValue output, Null select @NextSequenceValue as NextSequenceValue
When i queried sp_who2 it shows that my processid is blocked by some other processid.. and when i do DBCC INPUTBUFFER (blockingprocessid), the query of blocking processid and my nextsequence generation stored proc is not realted at all..
Can you help shed some light on why my nextsequence generating proc is getting hunged...?
If I kill a blocked process, why does the current activity window still show the process? Both processes, blocking and blocked, are scheduled tasks. Also, the blocked process is still listed as a running task in the manage scheduled task window.
HiShortly, I keep invoices in a table.Occasionally, someone will fire the execution of a stored procedure(SP) that performs several UPDATEs against (potentially) all invoicesOLDER than a date that is supplied to the SP as a parameter.The SP is usually a lengthy process (it takes at least 30 mins).The problem is that SQL server 2000 Dev Edition doesn't allow me toinsert new invoices that are "younger", while the SP is executing.How should I specify to SQL Server that new invoices are "harmless"?Thanks.
we have a database here and something happened which causes a database block. We tried to run the 'sp_who' 'active' command to see the spid which locked the database, and we found out that some transaction is blocking another transaction. The following is the sample data results from the sp_who 'active'
