Activation Procedure Design
Apr 24, 2007
I've been experimenting with Service Broker and was surprised at one aspect of the design: the interface to Activation stored procedures.
I would have expected the queue to be a parameted passed to the procedure rather than having to hard code the queue query into the SP.
In a system with lots of queues it seems plausible that the same activation procedure might want to be used with several queues.
Any comments?
David.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 25, 2008
Hi,
I have implemented the code from the 'Recycling Conversations' post that Remus Resanu has posted. For some reason my sender activation procedure never gets called. I thought it was working at one point but now can not get it to work. Messages are being sent correctly from sender to receiver but the c_audit_send_queue_activation procedure never gets called.
According to my code that calls 'begin conversation timer(@dlg) timeout=30;' I would think that after 30 seconds that my activated procedure would get called with a DialogTimer message but it does not. Nor does the activation procedure on the sender get called when I manually end conversations on the receiver side.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Here is my send procedure:
Code Snippet
create procedure [dbo].[c_audit_p_send_message]
@msg nvarchar(max)
as
begin
if @msg is not null
begin
begin try
set nocount on;
declare @dlg uniqueidentifier
declare @counter int;
declare @error int;
declare @errid bigint, @dbname nvarchar(128)
set @counter = 1;
begin transaction;
while(1=1)
begin
select @dlg = dialog_id from dbo.audit_dialog with(holdlock) where audit_dialog_id_X = @@spid
if @dlg is null
begin
begin dialog conversation @dlg
from service [tcp://SFT3DEVSQL01:4022/TyMetrix360Audit/DataSender]
to service '//TyMetrix360Audit/DataWriter','7A9690F7-11A5-4ABB-ACBA-EECC1A58ACB7'
on contract [//TyMetrix360Audit/Contract] with encryption = off;
begin conversation timer(@dlg) timeout=30;
insert into dbo.audit_dialog(audit_dialog_id_X, dialog_id) values(@@spid, @dlg)
end;
send on conversation @dlg message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message] (@msg)
set @error = @@ERROR;
if @error = 0
begin
break;
end
set @counter = @counter + 1;
if @counter > 10
begin
raiserror(N'Failed to SEND on a converstation for more than 10 times.',16,1) with log;
insert into audit_error (error_procedure, error_line, error_number, error_message, error_severity, error_state, audited_data)
select error_procedure(), error_line(), error_number(), error_message(), error_severity(), error_state(), @msg
break;
end
delete from dbo.audit_dialog where dialog_id = @dlg;
set @dlg = null;
end
commit transaction;
end try
begin catch
insert into audit_error (error_procedure, error_line, error_number, error_message, error_severity, error_state, audited_data)
select error_procedure(), error_line(), error_number(), error_message(), error_severity(), error_state(), @msg
select @errid = scope_identity(), @dbname = db_name()
raiserror (N'Error while sending Service Broker message to TyMetrix360Audit. Error info can be found in ''%s.dbo.AUDIT_ERROR'' table with id: %I64d', 16, 1, @dbname, @errid) with log;
end catch
end
end
GO
here is the activatation procedure:
Code Snippet
create procedure [dbo].[c_audit_p_send_queue_activation]
as
begin
declare @dlg uniqueidentifier
declare @msgtype sysname
declare @msg varbinary(max)
begin transaction;
receive top(1) @dlg = conversation_handle, @msgtype = message_type_name, @msg = message_body from dbo.TyMetrix360AuditQueue
if @dlg is not null
begin
delete from audit_dialog where dialog_id = @dlg
if @msgtype = N'http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/DialogTimer'
begin
send on conversation @dlg
message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/EndConversation] ('');
end
else if @msgtype= N'http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/EndDialog'
begin
end conversation @dlg
end
else if @msgtype = N'http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/Error'
begin
end conversation @dlg
declare @error int;
declare @description nvarchar(4000);
with xmlnamespaces ('http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/Error' as ssb)
select @error = cast(@msg as xml).value('(//ssb:Error/ssb:Code)[1]', 'int'), @description = cast(@msg as xml).value('(//ssb:Error/ssb:Description)[1]', 'nvarchar(4000)')
raiserror(N'Received error Code:%i Description:''%s''', 16, 1, @error, @description) with log;
insert into audit_error (error_procedure, error_line, error_number, error_message, error_severity, error_state, audited_data)
select error_procedure(), error_line(), error_number(), error_message(), error_severity(), error_state(), @msg
end
end
commit transaction;
end
and here is the code that creates the service broker on the sender:
Code Snippet
if exists (select * from sys.routes where name = 'TyMetrix360Route') drop route TyMetrix360Route
if exists (select * from sys.services where name = N'tcp://SFT3DEVSQL01:4022/TyMetrix360Audit/DataSender') drop service [tcp://SFT3DEVSQL01:4022/TyMetrix360Audit/DataSender]
if exists (select * from sys.service_queues where name = N'TyMetrix360AuditQueue') drop queue TyMetrix360AuditQueue
if exists (select * from sys.service_contracts where name = N'//TyMetrix360Audit/Contract') drop contract [//TyMetrix360Audit/Contract]
if exists (select * from sys.service_message_types where name = N'//TyMetrix360Audit/Message') drop message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message]
if exists (select * from sys.service_message_types where name = N'//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/Blob') drop message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/Blob]
if exists (select * from sys.service_message_types where name = N'//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/EndConversation') drop message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/EndConversation]
GO
create route TyMetrix360Route authorization dbo with
service_name='//TyMetrix360Audit/DataWriter',
broker_instance='7A9690F7-11A5-4ABB-ACBA-EECC1A58ACB7',
address='TCP://SFT3DEVSQL01:4022'
create message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message] validation=none;
create message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/Blob] validation=none;
create message type [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/EndConversation] validation=none;
create contract [//TyMetrix360Audit/Contract]([//TyMetrix360Audit/Message] sent by initiator, [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/Blob] sent by initiator, [//TyMetrix360Audit/Message/EndConversation] sent by initiator);
create queue dbo.TyMetrix360AuditQueue
alter queue dbo.TyMetrix360AuditQueue with activation(status=on,max_queue_readers=1,procedure_name=[c_audit_p_send_queue_activation],execute as owner);
create service [tcp://SFT3DEVSQL01:4022/TyMetrix360Audit/DataSender] authorization dbo on queue dbo.TyMetrix360AuditQueue
grant send on service::[tcp://SFT3DEVSQL01:4022/TyMetrix360Audit/DataSender] to public
GO
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2006
CLR function has the following few lines which is invoked from Internal Activation Stored Procedure:
SqlCommand command = Connection.CreateCommand();
command.CommandText = "CREATE ASSEMBLY " + """ + AsmName + """ +" AUTHORIZATION [dbo]"+ " FROM " + "'" + regasm.UncPath + "'" + " WITH PERMISSION_SET=SAFE";
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
I am getting the following error:
"Could not impersonate the client during assembly file operation."
The CLR function is invoked from Service Broker internal activation stored procedure.
"SELECT user_name()" returns dbo just before CREATE ASSEMBLY execution.
SqlContext.WindowsIdentity.Name is "NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM" as the Data Engine runs with the LocalSystem account.
How do I create a the necessary security context for "CREATE ASSEMBLY" to succeed ?
Service Broker Queue activation with EXECUTE AS = "SELF", "OWNER", domain account or dbo, all result in the above error. The Service Broker assembly having the internal activation stored procedure is registered "unsafe".
Many Thanks.
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2006
I use Try ... catch blok in my activation stored procedure. When SQL Server raise error (e.g. Primary key violation) in Try blok, XACT_STATE in Catch blok has value 1 = commitable transaction and I can use rollback transaction to savepoint. But when I use Raiserror() in Try blok, XACT_STATE in Catch blok has value -1 = uncommitable transaction and I can't use rollback transaction to savepoint. When I drop automatic activation for given queue and I run this stored procedure with Raiserror(), XACT_STATE has value 1 = commitable transaction.
What a problem may cause this different behavior ?
Best Regards,
Pavel
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2006
Hi guys, please see if you can help me with this...
I have an activation stored procedure that starts a SQL Agent Job which executes a SSIS package. However when the stored procedure runs it fails with the error EXECUTE permission denied on object 'sp_start_job'. The message queue was created under the €˜sa€™ account, and I have tried setting the activation procedure to run as SELF, OWNER as well as creating a user account with sysadmin rights and running it under that account, all with the same result. When I run the stored procedure manually (under pretty much any of the accounts I have set up) it executes without any errors and kicks off the job it is meant to. The error only occurs when the stored procedure is activated via the service broker message queue.
I changed the stored proc to write out system_user and current_user to a table so that I could see what it was running as and as it turns out it appears to be running as the correct user (which is €˜sa€™ when set to SELF) but not inheriting the correct permissions.
Is this a bug, and if so is there some work-around for it?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2007
We are looking for some guidance with an issue we have picked up with our implementation of Service Broker here on the ABSA Capital project and I am hoping you can help or point us in the direction of someone.
The architecture we have implemented for service broker is to make use of an Activation stored procedure on two queues (1 SP per queue) to process the messages received. What we have found is that the activation stored procedure runs on a background session and its CPU time and memory just grows to the point where it brought one of our UAT servers to a grinding halt.
Is there anyway we can reduce the memory consumption of the activation stored procedure or is this one of those things that still need to be ironed out in Service Broker?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2006
Hi, All!
Could you please help me in my problem?
I develop Service Broker applcation, SB has 20 queues, also I have one Activation Procedure which carries out following actions:
CREATE PROCEDURE proc_ms_Activation
AS
BEGIN
WAITFOR (RECEIVE TOP(1) message_type_name, message_body, conversation_handle, message_id FROM Queue1)
-- process message, save statisctisc and etc
END
Problem in that: when I execute command WAITFOR (RECEIVE TOP (1) message_type_name, message_body, conversation_handle, message_id FROM Queue1) I should specify a name concrete Queue, for example "... FROM Queue1 ". I would like to use one procedure for processing all Queue.
How I can design my application that one Activation Procedure processed messages from all Queues?
Thank a lot for help.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2008
Hey all,
I've got a design problem I'm trying to figure out. I'm designing a search function for a table, and I'm trying to figure out the best way to design my stored procedures. The search form allows for 72 different possibilites of returns: 3 booleans that can be combined (1 of each, 2 of 3, or all 3), and 3 dropdown lists that have 2, 3, and 4 options respectively that also can be an "any" (no preference) value.
Should I write a stored procedure to handle each of this situations (and the corresponding methods in the DAL and BLL providers)? Or would it be easier to use a generic GetItem procedure and use rules in the business layer to sort it all out (which I'm not entirely sure how to go about doing, much less how to display in a gridview from said data)?
Any suggestions, articles, or ideas that'll help get me going on the right path would be appreciated.
Thanks!
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2000
I have the following design as my starting point.
4 sql tables.
I will be doing a variety of searches against these 4 tables (525 different searches to be exact).
Which search is performed is based on table requested and the search criteria fields passed. One of the four tables will always be searched and one of the other three as well.
I have a driver stored procedure that determines which of the 3 tables to read and calls separate subordinate stored procedures for the table selected. Then it calls a stored procedure to select from the table that is always read.
I am building temporary tables to hold the results from the two tables read in each pass. Then the driver will return the results to the client.
My question is this, is there a more elegant way to determine which one of my 525 queries need to be executed than a very ugly large if/then/else, checking all of the possible combinations of parameters passed in each subordinate stored procedure?
Is there some way to create dynamic sql select statements based on the parameters passed to the subordinate stored procedures that have actual values (not null)?
Any insight would be a big help.
Judy
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2007
Hi, all.
I have a question about how you would design this. I have to return a list of projects in a stored procedure with a statement like this:
SELECT ProjectID, ProjectName FROM PROJECTS;
This populates a DropDownList with all possible projects. When the user selects one, I need to find out more information about that project, like this:
SELECT a.ProjectID, a.ProjectName, b.OtherStuff FROM PROJECTS a INNER JOIN OTHERSTUFF b on a.ProjectID = b.ProjectID;
In the old ASP world, we just filled the ProjectID parameter with NULL if we wanted to return all results, and the stored procedure was set up to dynamically return results based on whether that parameter was NULL or not.
I'm looking for a more elegant way to do this. I can use two stored procedures, but I'm not sure what to name them. Obviously, I could call one 'SelectProjects' and the other 'SelectProject', but that just doesn't seem elegant enough. Anyone have any other ideas?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2015
I want to create a stored procedure for displaying working Saturdays. For example... last working Saturday 08/08/2015 (dd/mm/yyyy) is working day, I want to get next working Saturday as 22/08/2015 (dd/mm/yyyy). Likewise, I want to show for particular year
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2015
I have a problem where a certain stored procedure disappears occasionally and I need to find out which script deletes it. I found this piece of code which gives the events related to the deletion of this stored procedure.
DECLARE @path NVARCHAR(260);
SELECT
@path = REVERSE(SUBSTRING(REVERSE([path]),
CHARINDEX(CHAR(92), REVERSE([path])), 260)) + N'log.trc'
FROM sys.traces
WHERE is_default = 1;
[code]...
Is there a way that I can find which stored procedure or event dropped this stored procedure?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2007
I was testing around with a sample service broker app using activation, and came across an interesting question. The little app sends a series of four messages to a queue, either on the same conversation or on seperate ones. Each message invokes one stored procedure in my activation procedure. All the procedure does is enter a record into a test table and then wait for an allotted amount of time. In my example, the first message called a proc that waited 20 sec, the 2nd one that waited 10 seconds, the third 5 seconds, and the 4th 1 second. I am using internal activation on the queue. It seemed that in both scenarios (sending on 4 separate conversations and on one conversation) the procedures executed "almost" sequentially. "Almost" meaning that the first procedure was done before the last one started executing. It makes sense to me that this would happen where I sent them on the same conversation, but not really when I sent them on 4 seperate ones. Is it because when I call a procedure from my activation procedure it locks the queue so that another message cannot be processed (I'm processing a message at a time)? How could I make it so that the 4th procedure (the one that only waits 1 second) returns before the 1st procedure (the one that waits 20 seconds)?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2006
I have two databases on the same instance.
One is Basket_ODS and the other is Intelligence_ODS. I am using service broker activation on a queue to move data from the Basket_ODS table to the Intelligence_ODS database. Previously I was able to move from table to table in Basket_ODS, however now that I am moving it to another database on the same instance it is no longer working.
If I set my active connection in SQL Management Studio to this user(BrokerUser) and execute the "move" procedure it works. When activated by Service Broker however, it does not. Here is the error message:
2006-05-09 14:47:52.940 spid86s The activated proc [ODS].[ProcessOrderQueue] running on queue Basket_ODS.ODS.Order Process Queue output the following: 'The server principal "BrokerUser" is not able to access the database "Intelligence_ODS" under the current security context.'
I'm sure I missed something becasue it works fine in the same database. BrokerUser has datareader and datawriter in both databases.
Thanks for any help on this matter.
Gary
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2006
We are trying to use xp_cmdshell commands in service broker. If I kick off the process without activation, the process succeeds. If I enable activation, the tasks with xp_cmdshell fail.
The xp_cmdshell task is either a echo command so that users know that we are processing a database, or a file copy.
I used the TechNet article by Roger Wolter to create the queues and stored procedures.
We will be working across domains that have one-way trusts.
Wayne
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2006
Hi There
Everything works 100% until i activate my sp.
I specify to execute as 'dbo' in the alter queue statement. I also define the activated sp to execute as 'dbo'.
But i keep getting permission errors from my activated sp. i have tried to excute as 'sa' , i have even tried to write a job that excutes to stored procedure but it also get weird errors. Bottom line if i exceute the sp in management studio logged in as sa it works , but thorugh activation or a job nothing works, as 'dbo' or 'sa'.
???
Thanx
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2007
I need to change the Activation Key for a copy of SQL Server 2000 that I already have installed and up and running. I have the new key but can't figure out how to change from the old, no longer valid, key.
How can I change keys w/o dumping the DB, uninstalling, and reinstalling all of my instances?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2006
I have seen the posting on determining how activation has failed and looking through the system logs is very helpful in determining why activation is not occuring, however, short of looking through the SQL Server logs is there another way to get the same information? Access to the SQL Server logs is fairly restricted. Does anyone know another way that this can be done? I have used the execute as technique described in the article on "Troubleshooting Activation Stored Procedures" and found it helpful in some cases.
Gary
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2007
Hi,
I'm using service broker queue with internal activation to run a stored procedure.
The DB server is windows 2003 R2, 4 cpu, with SQL server 2005 SP2.
When I'm runing the stored procedure directly from the sql management studio it takes about 75% of the cpu and running for about a minute, but when the stored procedure is activated by the queue internal activation (as a background process) it uses only 25% of the machine cpu (my guess it uses only 1 cpu insted of all 4 cpu) and running for much longer time (sometimes even more than one hour).
How can I change this behavior? I want it to run as fast as possible.
The queue decleration is:
CREATE QUEUE [TaskQueue]
WITH ACTIVATION (
STATUS = ON,
PROCEDURE_NAME = ProcessTasksProc,
MAX_QUEUE_READERS = 1,
EXECUTE AS SELF);
Thanks in advance,
Shai Brumer
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2006
So is there something I'm supposed to configure to allow activation to fire after a cluster failover. We have had three where I have noticed that activation does not automatically fire back up. i have to alter the queue to get it going. None of the values on sys.service_queues imply that is disabled, but messages just keep stacking up into the queue and are not being dealt with. Once I alter the queue to turn activation on; everything takes off and starts working normaly.
Obviously, this is less than desireable for an environment that requires High availability.
Regards
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2007
Newbie question, but is there a way for me to set up a thread in my c# code so as it sleeps until it gets woken up by an event fired by an activation SP?
As in queue sits idle, thread sleeps.
Queue receives a message, activation SP gets fired, activation SP raises an event which gets caught by event handler in code, which wakes up thread to do processing?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2007
Hi All,
Currently I have a PC that has MSDE installed on it and is attached to database (MyData.MDF and a log file MYLog.LDF) located on its hard drive at c:data. When I detach from the database, place a copy of the two files noted above on my network drive @ u:data and try to attach I get the following error€™s:
SQL[1] exec error = -1: Changed database context to 'master'.
€œDevice activation error. The physical file name u:dataMyData.MDF may be incorrect.€?
I have done some testing a have found that I can attach to a copy of my database if I move it anywhere on the c: drive, and or even to a 1Gb USB key attached to the system(e:). So far it seems to only be an issue if I move it to a mapped network drive. If anyone could please provide me with any info it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
James D.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2006
Is there any way to increase the activation time, i.e. the time between service broker creating a new instance of the activation SP.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2006
Hi
I'm having problems with activation. I have a CLR stored procedure that runs fine when run directly (and consumes messages from the queue). When I try to enable activation nothing happens. I've tried different execute as options and looked in the sql server logs and I don't see anything indicating why.
I've checked sys.service_queues and all options look correct including activation options. The sys.dm_broker_activated_tasks view is empty.
Without any errors I'm having difficulty tracking down the problem. I've seen references to service broker shutting down the procedure if it doesn't consume any messages but I haven't seen where this is indicated.
Any help appreciated.
Duncan Godwin
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2006
Good day,
I have send a msg successful,but the proc failed. I altered the proc to correct the problem in the proc. The msg are still in the queue. Is there a manual way to excute the proc again to process the msg in the q? or do I wait for service broker to do it after a retry time (self recover)?
thank you in advance.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2006
I am looking for an example of a SP that shows the best practices for internal activation? In BOL this topic describes the typical patter for reading messages from a queue. What is the typical pattern for reading messages from a queue using an internally activated SP? Do we still need to loop (considering the message arrival actually fired the sp)?
Any advice provided would be helpful.
Thanks!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2006
Is there any way to identify the context by which a stored proc has been activated. i.e.
I want to use the same sp to end conversations on receipt of the end mesage from the target.
However I don't know how to find out which queue activated the SP.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2006
I have a set of service broker services setup that rely on external activation to process messages. I'm using the GotDotNet ExternalActivator, and it launches console applications that do the actual retrieval from the queues. The console applications are written to run continuously to avoid the cost of starting up .NET based console apps over and over again.
I am observing very odd timing behavior. With the receive queues empty and the external activator configured to run a minimum and maximum of 5 instances, I observe in SQL Profiler that most of the receive operations finish in about the same amount of time as my WAITFOR command in my receive stored procedure. However, there is usually one receive command that consistently takes upwards of 30 seconds and often causes sql timeout exceptions to be thrown. I know that I could code around this, but I wasn't really expecting this behavior.
Does anyone have any thoughts on why it might be occurring? I would have expected to routinely see my receive operations taking 15 seconds, give or take, especially when the queue is empty. Also, I have observed this behaviour on both SQL 2k5 Express and Dev Editions, so I don't think it's a version thing.
The stored procedure I am using to do the receive is:
Create PROCEDURE [dbo].[P_RTD_MessageBase_Receive]
@receiving_queue_name varchar(255),
@receiving_time_out int
AS
Declare @receiveQuery nvarchar(300)
Set @receiveQuery = 'WAITFOR(RECEIVE * FROM [dbo].['+ @receiving_queue_name +']),
TIMEOUT ' + cast (@receiving_time_out as varchar)
Execute sp_executeSql @receiveQuery
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2007
BOL only seems to say that you can do it w/o really showing how, and the ExternalActivator sample at gotdotnet.com contains so much functionality I'm not sure what's required just for the external activation. Are there any docs or samples out there that focus on how to do it w/o obscuring the matter with a bunch of other functionality? (I prefer docs to project samples, b/c the samples tend to have hacks like hardcoded paths and connection strings so that they rarely work correctly right out of the box.)
TIA
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2006
I will have a variety of different types of work that will come into my Service Broker queue and I'll likely have a stored procedure or two for each of the different types of work (ie. move order header, move items, move payment, etc.) What is required to be done in each of these steps may vary by the subsidiary and type of order coming in. My plan is to use exclusively stored procedures but to execute them dynamically using sp_executesql. I think I should use sp_executesql because that way I can have a config file (in xml) that I can store what stored procedures need to be called for which unit of work/order type/subsidiary. If I do this I should be able to easily configure each type of work to be done in a config file and let Service Broker handle the execution dynamically. As long as I keep the parameters the same for each of the stored procedures (I'm thinking maybe 4 or 5 parameters) and passing them to each of the stored procedures, this approach will allow me to dynamically configure Service Broker to do what it is supposed to do. I can pull what needs to be done out of the message that comes in with an XQuery expression on the config file. I know that I will have to configure my user (activation user) to be able to run sp_executesql and the security may be complex (especially since I'm using certificates). I can not use trusted databases. Are there any other considerations I should think about?
Gary
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2007
OK, so assume I am recycling dialogs in my client code, and assume I am doing something similar to get a dialog handle in my TSQL. What should the activated stored procedure that is processing my queue look like if I am expecting thousands of messages per second? Assume also that there is a small bit of logic need to process each individual message? I am building for a high-throughput scenario and would like to get as much as possible out of each second-tier service broker server as possible before the aggregated data is moved up the chain to a master. The first tier is Express on a web server and exists primarily only as a forwarding mechanism.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2006
I have an application that is set up using Service Broker to pass messages between services asynchronously. I am using event-based external activation and have successfully set up my event notification in SQL Server so if a message appears on any of my Service Broker queues, I'm getting the activation event from SQL Server sent to my activation service.
The problem that I am seeing is that every time I am posting a message onto a Service Broker queue, I am losing the event notification entry in the sys.event_notifications view and I'm not receiving my activation event notifications. When I execute the CREATE EVENT NOTIFICATION T-SQL statement to recreate the event notification, I'm getting the event notification immediately (since there are messages on the queues being monitored). The event notification appears to be registered until the next message is posted on the queue.
Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
Michael
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2006
I have two databases Basket_ODS and Intelligence_ODS.
I created a user in the Basket_ODS and Intelligence_ODS databases as follows:
USE Basket_ods
GO
CREATE MASTER KEY ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = '*******'
CREATE USER BasketServiceUser WITHOUT LOGIN
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON SERVICE::[Order Send] TO BasketServiceUser
GRANT CONTROL ON SERVICE::[Order Send]
TO BasketServiceUser
CREATE CERTIFICATE BasketServiceCertPriv
AUTHORIZATION BasketServiceUser
WITH SUBJECT = 'ForBasketService'
BACKUP CERTIFICATE BasketServiceCertPriv
TO FILE = 'BasketServiceCertPub'
In the other database...
I created the following:
USE Intelligence_ODS
GO
CREATE MASTER KEY ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = '************
USE Intelligence_ODS
GO
CREATE USER BasketServiceUser WITHOUT LOGIN
CREATE CERTIFICATE BasketServiceCertPub
AUTHORIZATION BasketServiceUser
FROM FILE = 'BasketServiceCertPub'
My Queue is in BASKET_ODS and is set up as:
ALTER QUEUE ODS.[Order Process Queue] WITH
ACTIVATION (
STATUS = ON,
PROCEDURE_NAME = ODS.ProcessOrderQueue,
MAX_QUEUE_READERS = 4,
EXECUTE AS 'BasketServiceUser'
)
I have performed the following grants in Basket_ODS
grant execute on ODS.ProcessOrderQueue to BasketServiceUser
ProcessOrderQueue calls [ODS].[MoveOrderTotals_Core] in the Intelligence_ODS database.
grant execute on [ODS].[MoveOrderTotals_Core] to BasketServiceUser
ProcessOrderQueue proc is set as follows:
ALTER procedure [ODS].[ProcessOrderQueue]
WITH EXECUTE AS 'BasketServiceUser'
[ODS].[MoveOrderTotals_Core] is set up as follows:
when I run ProcessOrderQueue I get an error message:
ALTER procedure [ODS].[MoveOrderTotals_Core](@Orderid uniqueidentifier)
with execute as 'BasketServiceUser'
I just don't understand when I run ProcessOrderQueue I get the following error message (when database trust is turned off)
The server principal "sa" is not able to access the database "Intelligence_ODS" under the current security context.
Can you help me figure out what I'm doing wrong. I've spent so much time on this security stuff. Is there another way to do this that is more straight forward without using database trust?
View 3 Replies
View Related