Analysis :: MDX To Filter For Completed Periods Only (part Of Annualized Calculation)

Sep 9, 2015

I have been following the tutorial/blog post HERE to create an annualization (or "run rate") of my Gross Amount measure.  What I want to do now is exclude any period that is not "complete".  

For example, if today is 9/9 then Q3 is not complete - only Q1 and Q2 are complete.  And if I'm looking at it monthly then January through August are complete, but September is not.

Cells B5 and D5 look exactly as I expect and want them to be. On row 6 below under each "Gross Annualized" value I have basically just put the formula for what it's actually doing.

What I would like to see in the blue cell is $67,211,697,268 - essentially the most recent annualization for a completed period. The annualization for Q3 is misleading because the quarter has not yet completed.  There's $16b in Q1 and $17b in Q2, so the measly $78m in Q3 (yellow cell) is dragging the annualization down significantly. Even worse, the Gross Amount for Q4 is being treated as a $0.00, which is further dragging down the "2015 Gross Annualized" amount in blue. In a T-SQL average calculation, for example, I think the green cell would be treated as NULL rather than $0.  That's kind of the behavior I want.

So I would like to do two things:

Create a calculation (probably just a 0 or 1 flag) that indicates whether the current period is complete or not.  Again, using 9/9/2015 as an example, Q2 would be complete but Q3 would not be. And August would be complete, but September would not. Make the blue cell show $67,211,697,268 - an annualization based on completed quarters only.

For whatever it's worth here is the current calculation for Gross Annualized.

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[Gross YTD]
AS AGGREGATE(
YTD([Pay Date].[Calendar].CurrentMember)
,[Measures].[Gross Amount]),
FORMAT_STRING = "Currency",
VISIBLE = 0;

[Code] .....

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Analysis :: Annualized Amount Based On Completed Quarters

Aug 26, 2015

I would like to add a calculation to provide an annualized Gross Amount value.  Most solutions I have seen are for annualizing down to the day.  For instance, if today is the 123rd day of the year, the calculation would be Amount / 123 * 365.  What I want to do is annualize the amount based only on completed periods.  Today is 8/26.  

The last completed quarter ended on 6/30.  Therefore I want to basically take the sum of Q1 and Q2, divide by two, and multiply by four to get an annualized amount based on completed quarters.  Eventually I want to do something similar with months.

So here's what I have so far.  In my DSV my DimDate is actually based on a view.  The view has a Date column with the actual date, all of the normal fields you would expect in a DimDate table, and two columns that look like this:

CASE
WHEN [Date] < DATEADD(QQ, DATEDIFF(QQ, 0, GETDATE()), 0)
THEN 'Y'
ELSE 'N'
END AS
CompletedQuarter,

[Code] ....

Note that for dates between 1/1 and 3/31 the CompletedQuarterCount will be 0.  I want any annualized amount to be 0 in that case because I only want to use completed quarters in my calculation.

I added both to my Pay Date dimension (which uses vwDimDate from the DSV) in the cube.  I have tried the calculation below and in my Excel pivot table I'm getting blanks for the calculated field.

CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].[Gross Amount Annualized by Pay Date Quarter]
AS SUM(
IIF([Pay Date].[Pay Date Completed Quarter Count] > 0,
[Gross Amount] / [Pay Date].[Pay Date Completed Quarter Count] * 4,
0)
),
FORMAT_STRING = "Currency",
VISIBLE = 1 , ASSOCIATED_MEASURE_GROUP = 'Fact Claim' ;

So, is my calculation correct?

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Total Calculation With Filter For Parallel Period

Nov 30, 2015

I have developed a cube in my work place for analyzing current year sales with previous year sales in Time Hierarchy (Year- Quarter- Month) using Parallel period. If we want to see data for particular Quarters i.e. Q1 and Q2 then total at the year level should also get change. Currently if we only choose 2 quarters in the filter then current year data gets change, however data using parallel period is not getting change accordingly and its shows Total of full year.

View 4 Replies View Related

Analysis :: SSAS Calculation With Division Combined With A Time Calculation?

Sep 17, 2015

I have created calcalated measures in a SQL Server 2012 SSAS multi dimensional model by creating empty measures in the cube and use scope statements to fill the calculation.

(so I can use measure security on calculations

as explained here  )

SCOPE [Measures].[C];

THIS = IIF([B]=0,0,[Measures].[A]/[Measures].[B]);

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Median Calculation Using MDX

May 28, 2015

 I have a fact table fct_line_details having two columns mtid, productivity

  mtid     productivity
  1           400
1           200
1          600
2          700
3         900

I want to calculate the median for each mtid in SSAS . (median for mtid 1=400 )

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Calculation On Row Level / If Value Is Above Or Less Than Average

Aug 3, 2015

I have a set of data and calculated already the average of a specific measure, incl. the Standarddeviation of this measure. Now I want to create a average measure of the values on row level which arehigher than [Avg]-[StdDev] AND lower of [Avg]+[StDev].As far as I understand I have to check on Rowlevel, which means on Date and Brand Level, if the value of the measure is above or lower than the Mean +/- StdDev.

SUM( FILTER( {[Dim 1].[Attribue].&[selected]},[Measures].[Fact Survey Count] > [Measures].[Mean + 0,5 StDev] AND [Measures].[Fact Survey Count] < [Measures].[Mean - 0,5 StDev] ),[Measures].[Fact Survey Count])

which leads to a wrong result. This one counts all rows if true.With Descendants I got a #Value-Error, probably because I did not understand how the calculations work. I planned to include this in a IIF calculation.

SUM( Descendants(
    {[Dim 1].[Attribute].&[selected],
    [Dim Date].[Date].[Date].CURRENTMEMBER}, Leaves), [Measures].[Fact Survey Count])

View 4 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Calculation Based On Dimension Value

Oct 8, 2015

Need to resolve this calculation, which I would believe is something very common on SSAS environments. 

Like many companies, my company has different ways of calculating Sales and the two I want to focus are Sales Gross and Sales Net. 

At a high level, we calculate Sales Gross as Sales with returns, and Sales Net as Sales without returns.

We have an attribute called Order Type that has various types of orders a user can execute with my company. One of them is Returns. If you return something back to us, we record that as a return line on the sales table. With that, we can calculate that return, breaking data down by Order Type, such as:

Order Type Line Total

Mail Orders $ 776,655.44

Internet Orders $ 2,211,334.00

Call Center Orders $ 11,223,344.00

Credit Orders  $ (55,666.00)

Today, to calculate Sales Gross and Sales Net, we are creating two dimensions: DimSalesGross and DimSalesNet. 

To calculate Sales Gross, we leave the data at the natural state, not making any changes to mappings. 

To calculate Sales Net, we map Credit Orders to Call Center Orders at the ETL level, getting a Net value for sales (Orders - Returns), however, I doubt this is the correct way of doing. 

I would like to have a Line Total Net / Line Total Gross calculation, which would be based on the Order Type value.

Perhaps using a CASE statement in MDX? Is the above possible?

View 4 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Calculation That Excludes Filters

Jul 8, 2015

I'm trying to calculate the average number of sick days per person so that it can be broken down by person role or department or some other dimension. I have a calculation for sick days that works ok and is [measures].[sick days.I'm trying to create another calculation that is [total staff] but it doesn't work.

My final calculation will be [avg sick days] =  [measures].[sick days] / [measures].[total staff]

The bit I can't get to work is making it ignore any filters. For example I have a measure called [staff] and as you would expect it can be broken down by [person].[role] or [department].[department].

I'm trying to get [total staff] to return the total when it's used with [person] or [department]. I've managed to get it to work with [person] by using ROOT([Person]) but then I will need to do this for all different hierarchies that will use it.

View 12 Replies View Related

Mdx/analysis/reporting Service For Date Calculation

Apr 8, 2008

Hi,

I have a cube with the following
DimStartDate
DimEndDate
DimArea
FactDataCount

I need to output the following report

Area 5days 10days 30days
Miami 4 2 1
Memphis 3 3 2

1)Where do I do the dateDiff calculation, at report or cube level?
2)How do I work out which dates belong to the above groups? I'm assuming i have to check if the dateDiff lies between those numbers?

thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Display Calculation For Structure And Attributes Only

Jun 29, 2015

I have a calculation that granularity is on a specific level and therefore would like the calculation to be only visible/calculate when with a specific dimension structure & attributes

SCOPE([Measures].[Complaint Rate]);
SCOPE([Item Dimension].[Item Structure].Members);
this=(IIF([Measures].[Sales Units]=0,NULL,(([Measures].[Count]/[Measures].[Sales Units])*1000000)));
END SCOPE;
END SCOPE;

This displays the calculation all the time even if no item attributes are selected, I only want the calculation applicable to the structure & attributes belonging to structure - I tried children, currentmember etc. but no luck - its probably something small I am missing. Tried this too

this=(IIF([Measures].[Sales Units]=0,NULL,(([Item Dimension].[Item Structure].CURRENTMEMBER,[Measures].[Count]/[Item Dimension].[Item Structure].CURRENTMEMBER,[Measures].[Sales Units])*1000000)));

View 4 Replies View Related

Analysis :: SSAS Tabular - Preview Of Calculation Not Working

Oct 30, 2015

Does any1 know why preview of a DAX calculation does not work? I mean once you enter the calculation in the bottom of the table it doesnt´t show up.

View 8 Replies View Related

Analysis :: YTD Calculation For Multiple Hierarchies With SCOPE Statement

Jul 2, 2015

I am stuck in a situation where I want to use YTD for three different calendars of our company and don't want to create three different YTD calculations. However I want to make this work for any measure not for a particular measure

If I create one YTD and try to use in context of three calendars in SCOPE statements then it does not give my right results. Following is my syntax but It does not work.

SCOPE([Billing Date].[SalesCalendar].MEMBERS);
( [Aggregate].[AGGREGATE CODE].[YTD] )   
          = Aggregate({[Aggregate].[AGGREGATE CODE].DefaultMember}*{PERIODSTODATE([Billing Date].[SalesCalendar].[Sales Calendar Year],[Billing Date].[SalesCalendar].CURRENTMEMBER) } );

[Code] ....

However if I comment on one of SCOPE statement , other one works but both don't work simultaneously in context of different calendars.

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Total Calculation Incorrect When Using IF In Calculated Member

Oct 27, 2015

I cannot understand why Total of calculated member is displayed incorrect. How should I change calculated member for it to work correctly?

Calculated Member:
     CREATE MEMBER CURRENTCUBE.[Measures].AverageScore
        AS IIF([Measures].[Distance]<2001,0,[Measures].[avgscore]/[Measures].[Date Count]),
     VISIBLE = 1;

It seems that Total is calculated without checking value in "AverageScore" for that month.

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis Services Part Of SQLServer ?

Sep 29, 2004

Is Analysis services part of SQLServer ?
Should I install something ?


I need to create OLAP cubes in my SQLServer db.

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Using A Filter In CALCULATE

Sep 8, 2015

I'm having what i think it's a strange error in CALCULATE function:

Calculation:=CALCULATE( DISTINCTCOUNT([SK_CUSTOMER]); 'fact x'[_sales net]<>0)

where _sales net is a calculated column, sum of 3 existing columns lets call columnA , columnB, columnC

This calculation doesn't work well, the results seem to be like as if _sales net was only equal to columnA.

Naturally I've already done build deploy and full process.

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Conditional Filter In DAX

Aug 4, 2015

I need to conditionally include a filter in the below DAX query such a way that if an Account_ID is passed (as client side parameter) the filter should be included in the query otherwise if it is zero, the query should return results across all account. For example, if total purchase is queried for Account_ID=2 the query should be like this:

evaluate
calculatetable (
addcolumns (
summarize (
'Event'

[code]...

but if the Account_ID is passed as zero, condition 'Event'[Account_ID] = 2 should be removed.Is this possible to implement in DAX?

View 9 Replies View Related

Analysis :: MDX Filter With Alias

Sep 9, 2015

I am trying to get a list of years from a Date dimension that includes a limited number of values.  I want the current year and the previous 5 years.  The year number in the cube is actually a char(4) value so I will have to cast that.

Also I want to alias the field, since Im using this list to use as a parameter in an SSRS report.

The MDX I have at the moment is this:<br/>
WITH
MEMBER [SALESYEAR] AS
CInt([DimCalendar].[Year].CURRENTMEMBER)

SELECT 
NULL ON COLUMNS,FILTER(
[DimCalendar].[Year].MEMBERS , [SALESYEAR] > 2012) ON ROWS
FROM [MySalescube]

The above returns empty, but I also need to define an expression that is the current year - 5 years

View 4 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Average Calculation On Leaf And Aggregate Parent Level And Above Using Averaged Value?

Sep 14, 2015

At the 2nd level, the calculated measure will only be correct if it is Averaged. And at the 1st level, the calculated measure will only be correct to take these Average value from 2nd level and Sum then up together. 

Level 1 Level 2
A    
X1
X2
=================
(Avg of X1 + X2)  
B
Y1
Y2
Y3
=================
(Avg of Y1 + Y2 + Y3)
===================================================
(Sum of (Avg of X1 + X2)  + (Avg of Y1 + Y2 + Y3) )

Currently, Instead of summing all the 3 averaged value, it is averaging against all the items like,

(Avg of X1 + X2 + Y1 + Y2 + Y3)

My MDX currently looks something like that 

[Measure].[Value] / [Dimension].[Attribute.count] -> so i can get the avarage at the 2nd level but it doesn't require on the 1st level but retaining this value.

How can i do an average on the leaf level and using these average values to sum at parent level?

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL:Stmt Completed V SQL:Batch Completed

Apr 29, 2008

I'm troubleshooting a performance issue , Looking at Profiler - for the given statement, I'm getting the following figures , why would there be such a disparity between the figures. ? How can I go about finding out why there is such difference?


SQL:Stmt Completed:CPU = 31, Reads = 129 , Duration = 32
SQL:Batch Completed: CPU = 2531, Reads = 6087 , Duration = 2593



Jack Vamvas
--------------------
Search IT jobs from multiple sources- http://www.ITjobfeed.com

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Using Attribute As Second Parameter For FILTER?

Aug 13, 2015

For example, I have a Date dimension with attributes like Current Day and Current Month. If I run the following, I get exactly what I expect: a list of the days in the current month.

select
NULL on 0,
[Case - Date - PSPT Entry].[Year - Quarter - Month].[Date] on 1
from [Customer Support]
where
[Case - Date - PSPT Entry].[Current Month].&[True]

When I run the following, I'm getting a list of the days in the current month *plus the first couple days of the next month*. with

set [Days of Interest]
as
filter([Case - Date - PSPT Entry].[Year - Quarter - Month].[Date], [Case - Date - PSPT Entry].[Current Month].&[True])
select
NULL on 0,
[Days of Interest] on 1
from [Customer Support]

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Filter A Set Based On Same Measure?

Jun 10, 2013

I'm trying to create a percentile rank function based on the standard WIKI version:

I've seen Brian Knight's article here, but that only deals with percentile.

Where I'm struggling is getting the count of members in a set using a measure, in the current context on the same hierarchy, as the filter expression. I'm using the comparative set as in belonging to the same geographical location, and therefore associating by another attribute.

So, cl as below:

MEMBER [Measures].[RegionPercentileCount] AS
Count(
Filter(
NonEmpty(
descendants(Ancestor(
[Supplier].[NameMap].CurrentMember,
[Supplier].[NameMap].[Region]),
[Supplier].[NameMap].[Supplier Id]),
[Measures].[ActiveMeasure])
, [Measures].[ActiveMeasure] <
([Supplier].[NameMap].CurrentMember,
[Measures].[ActiveMeasure])))

Using the same measure and context hierarchy is always going to be equal, and therefore the count is always zero. Its almost as if I need a nested context for the FILTER which allows me to use enumerate the set on the same hierarchy whilst maintaining the external reference. 

I'm thinking that perhaps I'm going to have to create another hierarchy and use that as the filter set and reference through StrToMember or similar.

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Filter Data For Two Hierarchies

Sep 23, 2015

I have an existing MDX query returning the correct resultset. However, I want to add a filter so that for a combination of value in Hierarchy1 and Hierarchy2, the data is filtered out.

For example I have data like

H1    H2   Amount
1      1      100
2      1      50
3      1     45

I am getting a value of 100+50+45=195.

I want to filter the data for the combination H1=3 and H2=1. Expected result would be 100...

H1    H2   Amount
1      1      100
2      1      50

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: How To Filter Tabular Perspectives

Oct 5, 2015

I have been living in the T-SQL world for years, and am working on my first Tabular model.

I have a fact table that I would like to use for many reports. My idea is that I would use Perspectives in the tabular model to pull in the columns that I need for each purpose. In some cases, I also need to filter out some rows. Is there a way to filter perspectives? The only solution I am coming up with is to create views in SQL Server and import the fact table multiple times for each purpose. That doesn't seem very efficient.

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis Service: Filter Fact Table ?

Oct 6, 2004

I have a big table with several types of transsactions: PO (Puchase Orders, SO,( Sales orders), INV (Invoices) ....
I want to create cubes with only one type of transactions (1 cube for PO,...)

Where and how can I filter the rows I want to use in my cube ?

Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Distinct Count Using Filter Function

May 27, 2015

My requirement is to count the customer order number for premium order type orders which has some order quantity.I am using below MDX

count

Filter
(([Customer Order].[Dim Customer Orderkey].[Dim Customer Orderkey].members,
[Outbound Order Attributes].[Order Type].&[P]),[Measures].[Ordered, pcs]>0 ) ,
)

The result is accurate but the query execution time is 3-4 minutes for 10 fact records, when i use multiple dimension. it is showing me 0 valus for this measure for all the members for the dimesion attribute which doen't have any customer order. example it shows all the member of date dimension. is there any way to reduce the rows. i think this is the reason to take more execution time.when i use EXCCLUDEEMPTY the result is NULL

count

Filter
(([Customer Order].[Dim Customer Orderkey].[Dim Customer Orderkey].members,
[Outbound Order Attributes].[Order Type].&[C]),[Measures].[Shipped, pcs]>0 ) ,
EXCLUDEEMPTY)

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis :: IIF Does Not Aggregate AND Filter In SCOPE Does Not Work

Oct 22, 2015

We have two measures

[Measures].[NSPO]
is in FACT1  Measure Group
[Measures].[NetSignedPremium] is in FACT2  Measure Group

The requirement is Measure.[NetPremium] should be the greater of

[Measures].[NSPO] OR [Measures].[NetSignedPremium].
 
All three measures are created in the cube and this logic is to be applied in the Calculations section of the cube.

Using an IIF statement like one mentioned below does the job, but data does not aggregate correctly for the

Measure.[NetPremium]
Measure.[NetPremium] = IIF ([Measures].[NetSignedPremium] > [Measures].[NSPO], [Measures].[NetSignedPremium] , [Measures].[NSPO])

To ensure that the columns are aggregated I have to use a SCOPE statement at the leaf level

[01 UWR Reference].[UWR Reference].Members  
 
SCOPE(
    FILTER( NONEMPTY( [01 UWR Reference].[UWR Reference].Members   ) ,
          ( ( ([Measures].[Net Signed Premium Rcvd])
          - ( [Measures].[NSPOTest]  )  )
             < 0 )  )) ;
        This =   [Measures].[Net Signed Premium Rcvd]  ;       
END SCOPE;  

My problem is the FILTER within the SCOPE statement does not work. How to modify the filter in SCOPE? OR How to make IIF Aggregate correctly?

View 4 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Filter Measure On Intersection Of Dimensions

Jul 24, 2015

SSAS 2008 R2

Is it possible to filter out a measure only at the intersection of Two dimension members? I have a date dimension,  a Hospital dimension and a wait time measure.

For Example, is it possible to filter out Wait time for Bayside Hospital for the Month of June 2015?

I want Wait time to continue to be displayed for all other months and roll up into the totals without the filtered value.

View 4 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Using Named Set To Filter On Dimension Attribute

Jun 4, 2015

I am unable to find solution for the problem while writing a Named Set in my cube.

I have a calculated measures which gives me difference in Sales in PERCENTAGE (%).

When I try to filter out those product codes which went a less than 5 %, I get no records.

I have also tried to filter direct values lets say - Products with sales > 100000 which is working fine.

Following is sample of my Named Set

FILTER([X].[Products Code].members, [Measures].[Diff in Sales]<5)

I believe as the values are in percentage, I am facing this issue.

View 21 Replies View Related

Analysis :: MDX Need To Filter Measures Based On A Dimension

Oct 26, 2015

I am pretty new to MDX and am having trouble getting what I need out of this MDX query. Some business rules:

Gross Amount applies to all clients, whether Type A or Type B.  I always want to return Gross Amount.Some clients are Type A, some are Type B, some are both, and some are neither.There are Type A Net Amount and Type B Net Amount values for all clients, but I only want to display the Type A Net value if the client is a Type A client, only Type B if the client is a Type B, or both for both, and neither for neither.  I would like to return blank/null, not $0.00, for those values that should not be displayed.

Here's the basic query.  

SELECT { [Measures].[Gross Amount],
[Measures].[Type A Net Amount],
[Measures].[Type B Net Amount]
} ON COLUMNS,
NON EMPTY {[Dim Client].[Parent Client Code].[Parent Client Code] *
[Dim Client].[Child Client Code].[Child Client Code] *
[Dim Client].[Is Type A].CHILDREN *
[Dim Client].[Is Type B].CHILDREN
} ON ROWS
FROM ClientInfo

Here's the DESIRED output........

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Filter Numeric Values With Integer Value In SSAS

Jun 3, 2015

I have SSAS cube with Fact that include values in kg (e.g. 25.3, 32.5, 18,3...).What kind of attribute or other solution should I create If I want to filter those kg's in browser with integer values e.g.:weight between 10 and 25

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Have A Default Filter In PowerPivot Table Created With DAX

Nov 12, 2015

how can I have a default filters in my Excel PowerPivot Table, without the user need to select them in Excel creating with DAX Language.

View 8 Replies View Related

Analysis :: Tabular - Filter / Search For A Specific Measure Value?

May 14, 2015

One of my models has order data, cost per order/invoice ID and then dimensions on Fiscal Year, category, etc...the usual.

A user wanted to search it for an exact order amount.  (They knew for example that one of our accounts was not balancing by single order worth $746.13 and assumed it must be an order that was placed but never marked shipped that slipped through the cracks).

Now, in the model I have "order amount" as a field and then a measure that sums that.

I could expose that "order amount" field as a label and let them filter on it in Excel (and that works).

However, I haven't had any luck filtering on the actual measure "Total Order Amount".  Such as OrderID-> View Filter -> "Total Order Amount" equals 746.13.

I assume this is due to a few things:

Measure calculates at different levels so filtering on a measure is difficult as you would have to place all the "slicers" and set them first before the measure would "exist" at a level where it could be $746.13.  Orders by year would have $746.13 as part of it's year sum, but wouldn't exist as a stand alone line item orders by year 2015 might be 2 million. 

Orders by category might exist at 500,000, 8,000, 15,146.36, etc... but not $746.13.

So I would need OrderID on there as a column so the measure could return at the value of $746.13 for one row for it to match the filter?

Basically:
1. Why it can't really filter on a measure?
2. Is there a better way to accomplish this other than exposing the actual column in the fact table "order amount" as it feels like that could cause all kinds of confusion if other users try to slice/filter on that not realizing exactly what it is meant to be?

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis :: How To Apply A Filter To Decide Which Formula Is Used In A Calculated Measure

May 8, 2015

The user wants to be able, using excel, to apply a filter to all measures in every measure group. I though that I can create a dimension with a single level with two members, let´s say "on" and "off" and depending on the selected member and using an IIF statement decide which formula applies to the calculated measures.

I have serious doubts about the performance and for this technique because I am thinking as a .Net developer and not as a cube developer. Maybe it is better to resolve it scoping the measures but I cannot figure it out.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved