Why is it that SQL joins (*=) run a little faster as opposed to ANSI joins(LEFT JOIN...)? Aren't they supposed to be almost identical?
The issue is this: we are promoting using ANSI syntax for the obvious reason (future versions of SQL Server may not support SQL Server syntax; portability, etc.)
However, the problem is the speed. What have others done about this? Do you use ANSI syntax or SQL syntax? HOw true is it that future SQL Server versions may discontinue support for the '*=" and "=*' join operators.
Hi everyone.. can anyone help me on how to solve my problem regarding on Select.. im using PB6.5 and running on MSSLQ2005 database.. i attached an image for your reference.. thnks!
Help....I have a DB I'm working with that I know doesn't work with theANSI-92 JOIN SYNTAX....I'm not sure how much this limits my ability todeal with the following situation, so I'm soliciting the help of aguru....I apologize for the lack of scripted table structure, but thisdatabase is embedded in an application that I have no true schema for.I have a crude diagram of the tables and some of the relationships, butI've managed to have manually mapped some of the fields in the tablesI'm working with.What I have is a table(A) that I need to join with 10 othertables.....I'm joining on an identifier in the (A) that may exist manytimes in any of the other 10 tables...and may not be in ANY of thetables.When I run this query:SELECTSAMPLES.PK_SampleUID,UDFSAMPLEDATA02.AlphaData,UDF SAMPLEDATA01.AlphaData,UDFSAMPLEDATA03.AlphaData,UDFSAMPLEDATA05.AlphaData, UDFSAMPLEDATA06.AlphaData,UDFSAMPLEDATA07.AlphaData, UDFSAMPLEDATA08.AlphaData,UDFSAMPLEDATA09.AlphaData,UDFSAMPLEDATA10.AlphaDat aFROM SAMPLES, UDFSAMPLEDATA01,UDFSAMPLEDATA02,UDFSAMPLEDATA03,UDFSAMPLEDATA05,U DFSAMPLEDATA06,UDFSAMPLEDATA07 ,UDFSAMPLEDATA08, UDFSAMPLEDATA09, UDFSAMPLEDATA10WHERE UDFSAMPLEDATA02.AlphaData<>' ' ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA01.FK_SampleUID=SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA02.FK_SampleUID=SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA03.FK_SampleUID= SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA05.FK_SampleUID = SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA06.FK_SampleUID = SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA07.FK_SampleUID = SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA08.FK_SampleUID = SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA09.FK_SampleUID=SAMPLES.PK_SampleUID ANDUDFSAMPLEDATA10.FK_SampleUID = SAMPLES.PK_SampleUIDI return what appears to be the gazillion COMBINATIONS of all thefields in all the tables....they query doesn't even finish before theODBC driver I'm working with crashes my VBscript....Is there some way to take the multiple returned rows from a join andwork them all into ONE row per identifier?Any help I can garner would just make my week!TIA!J
Help!I'm trying to understand the new ANSI join syntax (after many years ofcoding using the old style). I am now working with an application that onlyunderstands ANSI syntax so I am struggling.My first (old style syntax) SQL statement below produces 60 rows:SELECT A1.CONTACTID, A1.LASTNAME, A1.FIRSTNAME, A1.ACCOUNT,A6.CITY, A6.STATE, A1.WORKPHONE, A1.FAX, A1.EMAILFROM CONTACT A1,ADDRESS A6WHERE A1.ADDRESSID=A6.ADDRESSIDAND A1.CONTACTID IN(SELECT A4.CONTACTIDFROM CONTACT_LEADSOURCE A4,LEADSOURCE A5WHERE A4.LEADSOURCEID = A5.LEADSOURCEIDAND A5.DESCRIPTION = 'some_description' )AND A1.CONTACTID IN(SELECT A2.CONTACTIDFROM TICKET A2,ENROLLHX A3,EVENT A7WHERE A3.STATUS IN ('R', 'Confirmed')AND A2.TICKETID = A3.EVXEVTICKETIDAND A3.EVENTID = A7.EVENTIDAND A7.CODE IN('AHS00','AHS01','AHS02','AHS03','AHS04','AHS98',' AHS99'))ORDER BY A1.LASTNAME ASCI am trying to convert this to the newer ANSI sytax. My second SQL statementbelow produces 67 rows (duplicates):SELECT A1.CONTACTID, A1.LASTNAME, A1.FIRSTNAME, A1.ACCOUNT,A6.CITY, A6.STATE, A1.WORKPHONE, A1.FAX, A1.EMAILFROM CONTACT A1JOIN ADDRESS A6 ON (A1.ADDRESSID=A6.ADDRESSID)JOIN( SELECT C.CONTACTIDFROM CONTACT CJOIN CONTACT_LEADSOURCE A4 ON (C.CONTACTID= A4.CONTACTID)JOIN LEADSOURCE A5 ON (A4.LEADSOURCEID =A5.LEADSOURCEIDAND A5.DESCRIPTION ='some_description' )) AS C1 ON C1.CONTACTID = A1.CONTACTIDJOIN(SELECT C2.CONTACTIDFROM CONTACT C2JOIN TICKET A2 ON (C2.CONTACTID =A2.CONTACTID)JOIN ENROLLHX A3 ON (A2.TICKETID =A3.TICKETID AND A3.STATUS in ('R', 'Confirmed'))JOIN EVENT A7 ON (A3.EVENTID = A7.EVENTIDAND A7.CODE IN ('AHS00','AHS01','AHS02','AHS03','AHS04','AHS98',' AHS99')))AS C3 ON C3.CONTACTID = A1.CONTACTIDCan anyone shed some light on what I am missing?cheers,Norm
My company wants me to research and flags or registry tricks that would allow non-ansi joins '=*' and '*=' in SQL Server 2005 with a compatiblity mode of 90 to be allowed.
The way I understand the situation is that in SQL Server 2005 with the database compatiblity set to 90, non-ansi join SQL such as the following would not work.
Select * from Customer, Sales Where Customer.CustomerID *= Sales.CustomerID
To work, the SQL above would have to be converted to ansi join SQL such as the following:
Select * from Customer LEFT OUTER JOIN Sales On Customer.CustomerID = Sales.CustomerID
Many hours would be spent browsing through millions of lines of code to find the non-ansi SQL and have changes made.
Does anyone know of any trace flaqs or registry entries that would allow SQL Server 2005 work in 90 compatiblity and still allow non-ansi =* and *= joins in SQL?
We find that a delete command on a table where the rows to be deleted involve an inner join between the table and a view formed with an outer join sometimes works, sometimes gives error 625.
If the delete is recoded to use the join key word instead of the = sign then it alway gives error 4425.
625 21 0 Could not retrieve row from logical page %S_PGID by RID because the entry in the offset table (%d) for that RID (%d) is less than or equal to 0. 1033 4425 16 0 Cannot specify outer join operators in a query containing joined tables. View '%.*ls' contains outer join operators. The delete with a correleted sub query instead of a join works.
Error 4425 text would imply that joins with view formed by outer joins should be avoided.
SQL Server 2000Howdy All.Is it going to be faster to join several tables together and thenselect what I need from the set or is it more efficient to select onlythose columns I need in each of the tables and then join them together?The joins are all Integer primary keys and the tables are all about thesame.I need the fastest most efficient method to extract the data as thisquery is one of the most used in the system.Thanks,Craig
I have four tables which I want to return results for an advanced search function, the tables contain different data, but can be quite easily joined,
Table A Contains a Main Image, this image is displayed in the results Table B Contains an Icon, this image is displayed in the results Table C doesn't have an image in it but has a child table with a number of images associated to the table, in the UNION ALL statement I would Like to do a Join to get say the top Image from this child and print it for the row associated with table C.
Select title, description, image from tableA UNION ALL Select title, description, icon as image from tableB UNION ALL title, description, ( inner Join SELECT top(1) from imageTableC where imagetableC.FK = tableC.PK) as image from tableC
Could someone show me the syntax to do this, I have all the information printing to the screen, bar this table C image.
Im having a problem with a statement i cannot seem to get 2 left joins working at the same time 1 works fine but when i try the second join i get this error:-
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e14'
[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Syntax error (missing operator) in query expression 'children_tutorial.school_id=schools.idx LEFT JOIN regions ON children_tutorial.region_id=region.idx'.
My SQL statment is as follows :- SELECT children_tutorial.*,schools.schoolname,regions.rname FROM children_tutorial LEFT JOIN schools ON children_tutorial.school_id=schools.idx LEFT JOIN regions ON children_tutorial.region_id=region.idx
I am using an Access database i have tried all sorts to get it working and its driving me mad!! any help would be really appreciated.
When I add a constraint to the where part of the SQL statement below it will only show the nc_department.department where siteid equals it. How do I pull and display all of those departments regardless of where the siteid = the selected item? In other words doesnt the Left outer Join supposed to grab all contents from the left table regardless?
SQL = "SELECT nc_department.order_id, nc_department.department, Count(nonconformance.department_id) as 'events', ISNULL(SUM(nonconformance.nc_wafer_qty),0) as wafers FROM nc_department LEFT OUTER JOIN nonconformance ON nc_department.department_id = nonconformance.department_id WHERE nc_department.active = '1' AND nonconformance.site_id = '" & siteid.SelectedItem.Value & "' GROUP BY nc_department.department , nc_department.order_id"
Soory if this is a bit basic, but I'm chasing my tail: I have two select statements: SELECT MyRows from Table1 where X = 1 SELECT OtherRows From Table 2 Where y = 3 I want to produce a LEFT JOIN between the result of each query, and return the resultant rows I know this is not correct syntax:
(SELECT MyRows from Table1 where X = 1) LEFT JOIN (SELECT OtherRows From Table 2 Where y = 3) ON Tabel1.Row1 = Table2.Row2
but I think it illustrates what I want to do If I do the WHERE after the join I only get where there is a righthand table I cant get the syntax right, an example with the correct grammar would be very much appreciated
Instead of inserting into, how can I use a join of multiple tables to update a table. This is the join that inserts.
INSERT INTO [table] (MyID, material, dollars) SELECT l.MyID, material, dollars FROM Tab_Client_Input l left outer JOIN Tab_Special_tox r ON l.MyID = r.MyID
Hi Folks, I writing a store procedure, the first three parts work pretty well. The last select statement has about 8 outer joins in it. every time I run the store procedure, I get an error message for the last part. Below are the error message and the store procedure:
Store Procedure:
--Create Procedure dbo.IMS_Donation
--AS
Select Distinct D_VST_ID as 'DRWLOC_ID', D_VST_INSTID as 'DRWLOC_INSTID' Into Donor_Visit1 From DNR_VST_DB_REC Where D_VST_DATE Between 20010101 AND 20040512 AND D_VST_DONTYP in ('AP', 'WB', 'RP', 'E2', 'E1') AND D_VST_STATUS = 'DN' ORDER BY D_VST_ID GO
SELECT DRWLOC_ID as 'COUNT_ID', DRWLOC_INSTID as 'COUNT_INSTID', count(*) as 'COUNT_VISITS' INTO Donor_Visit2 FROM DNR_VST_DB_REC, Donor_Visit1 Where D_VST_ID = DRWLOC_ID AND NOT EXISTS (Select R_DCC_ID From REC_DCC_DB_REC Where R_DCC_ID = DRWLOC_ID AND R_DCC_INSTID = DRWLOC_INSTID AND R_DCC_CALLCD = 'DC') GROUP BY DRWLOC_ID, DRWLOC_INSTID GO
SELECT DVT1.DRWLOC_ID as'COMP_ID', CMP.l_CMP_UNITNO as 'COMP_UNITID', CMP.L_CMP_INSTID as 'COMP_INSTID', count(*) as 'COMP_COMPTOT' INTO Donor_Visit3 FROM LAB_CMP_DB_REC CMP, Donor_Visit1 DVT1, DNR_VST_DB_REC VST, CMP_VST_Jct CVT WHERE CMP.L_CMP_INSTID = DVT1.DRWLOC_INSTID AND VST.D_VST_ID = DVT1.DRWLOC_ID AND VST.D_VST_UNITNO = CVT.L_CMP_UNITNO AND CMP.L_CMP_UNITNO = CVT.L_CMP_UNITNO AND CMP.L_CMP_STATCD != 'MOD' AND CMP.L_CMP_CMPCD NOT IN ('INC', 'EMTY') AND VST.D_VST_DATE BETWEEN 20010101 AND 20040512 AND VST.D_VST_STATUS = 'DN' GROUP BY DVT1.DRWLOC_ID, CMP.L_CMP_UNITNO, CMP.L_CMP_INSTID
GO
SELECT DISTINCT NAM.N_NAM_ID AS 'ID1', NAM.N_NAM_INSTID AS 'INSTID1', NAM.N_NAM_FNAME AS 'FNAME1', NAM.N_NAM_MINITIAL AS 'MINITIAL1', NAM.N_NAM_LNAME AS 'LNAME1', PER.N_PER_BIRTH AS 'BIRTH1', ADR.N_ADR_ADDR1 AS 'ADDR1', ADR.N_ADR_ADDR2 AS 'ADDR2', ADR.N_ADR_CITY AS 'CITY1', ADR.N_ADR_STATE AS 'STATE1', SUBSTRING(ADR.N_ADR_ZIP, 1,5) AS 'ZIP1', PER.N_PER_EMAIL AS 'EMAIL1', PER.N_PER_GENDER AS 'GENDER1', PHNA.N_PHN_AREACD AS 'AREAD1', PHNA.N_PHN_PREFIX AS 'PREFIXD1', PHNA.N_PHN_NUMBER AS 'NBRD1', PHNA.N_PHN_EXTENTN AS 'EXTD1', PHNB.N_PHN_AREACD AS 'AREAD2', PHNB.N_PHN_PREFIX AS 'PREFIXD2', PHNB.N_PHN_NUMBER AS 'NBRE2', PHNB.N_PHN_EXTENTN AS 'EXTD2', BTY.D_BTY_ABO AS 'ABO1', BTY.D_BTY_RHESUS AS 'RHI', VST.D_VST_DATE AS 'FIRST1', DV2.COUNT_VISITS AS 'COUNT', SUM(DTS.D_DTS_DONSUM) AS 'AWARD', ELG.D_ELG_RWBDTE AS 'ELIG1' --INTO Donor_Visit4 From Donor_Visit2 DV2 RIGHT OUTER JOIN DNR_DTS_DB_REC DTS ON DV2.COUNT_INSTID = DTS.D_DTS_INSTID RIGHT OUTER JOIN NAT_PER_DB_REC PER ON DV2.COUNT_INSTID = PER.N_PER_INSTID RIGHT OUTER JOIN DNR_BTY_DB_REC BTY ON DV2.COUNT_INSTID = BTY.D_BTY_INSTID RIGHT OUTER JOIN NAT_PHN_DB_REC PHNA ON DV2.COUNT_INSTID = PHNA.N_PHN_INSTID RIGHT OUTER JOIN NAT_PHN_DB_REC PHNB ON DV2.COUNT_INSTID = PHNB.N_PHN_INSTID RIGHT OUTER JOIN DNR_DTS_DB_REC DNT ON DV2.COUNT_ID = DNT.D_DTS_ID RIGHT OUTER JOIN NAT_PER_DB_REC PER1 ON DV2.COUNT_ID = PER1.N_PER_ID RIGHT OUTER JOIN DNR_BTY_DB_REC BTY1 ON DV2.COUNT_ID = BTY1.D_BTY_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN NAT_PHN_DB_REC PHNA1 ON DV2.COUNT_ID = PHNA1.N_PHN_ID RIGHT OUTER JOIN NAT_PHN_DB_REC PHNB1 ON DV2.COUNT_ID = PHNB1.N_PHN_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN NAT_PHN_DB_REC PHNA2 ON PHNA2.N_PHN_PHTYP = 'D' LEFT OUTER JOIN NAT_PHN_DB_REC PHNB2 ON PHNB2.N_PHN_PHTYP = 'E', --LEFT OUTER JOIN DNR_DTS_DB_REC DTS1 --DTS1.D_DTS_CNTTYP <> 'N', DNR_ELG_DB_REC ELG, NAT_NAM_DB_REC NAM, NAT_ADR_DB_REC ADR, DNR_VST_DB_REC VST WHERE DV2.COUNT_INSTID = VST.D_VST_INSTID AND DV2.COUNT_INSTID = ELG.D_ELG_INSTID AND DV2.COUNT_INSTID = N_NAM_INSTID AND DV2.COUNT_INSTID = N_ADR_INSTID AND DV2.COUNT_INSTID = VST.D_VST_INSTID --AND DV2.COUNT_INSTID = ELG.D_ELG_ID AND NAM.N_NAM_SEQNO = 0 AND VST.D_VST_DATE = (SELECT MIN(VSTB.D_VST_DATE) FROM DNR_VST_DB_REC VSTB WHERE VST.D_VST_INSTID = VSTB.D_VST_INSTID AND VSTB.D_VST_STATUS = 'DN' AND VST.D_VST_ID = VSTB.D_VST_ID) AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT R_DRC_ID FROM REC_DRC_DB_REC WHERE R_DRC_ID = COUNT_ID AND R_DRC_INSTID = COUNT_INSTID AND R_DRC_RESPCD = '15') GROUP BY NAM.N_NAM_ID, NAM.N_NAM_INSTID, NAM.N_NAM_FNAME, NAM.N_NAM_MINITIAL, NAM.N_NAM_LNAME, PER.N_PER_BIRTH, ADR.N_ADR_ADDR1, ADR.N_ADR_ADDR2, ADR.N_ADR_CITY, ADR.N_ADR_STATE, ADR.N_ADR_ZIP, PER.N_PER_EMAIL, PER.N_PER_GENDER, PHNA.N_PHN_AREACD, PHNA.N_PHN_PREFIX, PHNA.N_PHN_NUMBER, PHNA.N_PHN_EXTENTN, PHNB.N_PHN_AREACD, PHNB.N_PHN_PREFIX, PHNB.N_PHN_NUMBER, PHNB.N_PHN_EXTENTN, BTY.D_BTY_ABO, BTY.D_BTY_RHESUS, VST.D_VST_DATE, DV2.COUNT_VISITS, DTS.D_DTS_DONSUM, ELG.D_ELG_RWBDTE
Error Message:
(845 row(s) affected)
(844 row(s) affected)
(396 row(s) affected)
Server: Msg 9002, Level 17, State 6, Line 2 The log file for database 'tempdb' is full. Back up the transaction log for the database to free up some log space. Server: Msg 1105, Level 17, State 1, Line 2 Could not allocate space for object '(SYSTEM table id: -109901351)' in database 'TEMPDB' because the 'DEFAULT' filegroup is full.
I am not a SQL programmer, but I am trying to use data collected in our Job Costing system to feed data to a crystal report that summarizes the current department name and the last date each job was scanned into a department. I used aliases of the Process table to extract the max date for each department.
This statement works fine, but sometimes it hangs and locks my process table. I am not sure what event causes the lock, but I think it has to do with the users aborting the report during the SQL extract or multiple users trying to report at the same time (8am when they first arrive at work).
I showed this to a consultant and he showed me that the MAX statement in the 3rd to last join was eating most of the execution time. Also he told me I am using too many joins and should look into Table Views. The statement completes in 15 to 45 seconds, depending on the workload.
What can I do to improve the performance of this code and to avoid the locks?
SELECT OH.JobNumber, OH.PlantID, OH.CreateOpr, OC.ComponentNumber, PJN.ProductionCode as ProductionMax, P2.ProcessCode as MaxCC, PS.Description AS MaxCCDesc, PJ1.ProductionCode, P.ProcessCode as ProdCC, P51.CreateDatim AS SchCCDate, P53.CreateDatim AS TypCCDate, P55.CreateDatim AS OPrCCDate, P57.CreateDatim AS HPrCCDate, P59.CreateDatim AS CRmCCDate, P61.CreateDatim AS CCeCCDate, P63.CreateDatim AS PRmCCDate, P65.CreateDatim AS BinCCDate, P67.CreateDatim AS JbOCCDate, P69.CreateDatim AS OnDCCDate, P71.CreateDatim AS ShpCCDate, PS1.Description AS CCDesc, P.CreateDatim AS CCDate, OQT.Quantity, OH.JobDescription, OH.FormNumber, OH.JobDescription, OH.USERDEFINED1 AS JobType, OH.CustAccount, OH.CustName, (select OrderHeader.DueDate from OrderHeader where OrderHeader.JobNumber = OH.JobNumber and OH.NoDueDate = 0) as DueDate, OH.ProofDate, OH.OrderDate, OH.SalesRepCode, OH.PONumber, OH.PrevPONumber, OH.NoDueDate, OC.UserDefined1, OC.Description as ComponentDescription FROM OrderComponent OC INNER JOIN OrderHeader OH ON OC.JobNumber = OH.JobNumber INNER JOIN OrderQtyTable OQT ON OC.JobNumber = OQT.JobNumber and OC.ComponentNumber = OQT.ComponentNumber and OC.QtyOrdIndex = OQT.QuantityLineNo LEFT JOIN ProductionJobNumber PJ1 ON PJ1.JobNumber = OH.JobNumber and PJ1.ComponentNumber = OC.ComponentNumber LEFT JOIN Production P ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P.Code LEFT JOIN Production P51 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P51.Code AND P51.ProcessCode = 9151 LEFT JOIN Production P53 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P53.Code AND P53.ProcessCode = 9153 LEFT JOIN Production P55 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P55.Code AND P55.ProcessCode = 9155 LEFT JOIN Production P57 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P57.Code AND P57.ProcessCode = 9157 LEFT JOIN Production P59 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P59.Code AND P59.ProcessCode = 9159 LEFT JOIN Production P61 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P61.Code AND P61.ProcessCode = 9161 LEFT JOIN Production P63 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P63.Code AND P63.ProcessCode = 9163 LEFT JOIN Production P65 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P65.Code AND P65.ProcessCode = 9165 LEFT JOIN Production P67 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P67.Code AND P67.ProcessCode = 9167 LEFT JOIN Production P69 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P69.Code AND P69.ProcessCode = 9169 LEFT JOIN Production P71 ON PJ1.ProductionCode = P71.Code AND P71.ProcessCode = 9171 LEFT JOIN Process PS1 ON P.ProcessCode = PS1.ProcessCode LEFT JOIN ProductionJobNumber PJN ON PJN.ProductionCode = (select MAX(ProductionJobNumber.ProductionCode) From ProductionJobNumber where OH.Jobnumber = ProductionJobNumber.JobNumber AND OC.ComponentNumber = ProductionJobNumber.ComponentNumber) LEFT JOIN Production P2 ON PJN.ProductionCode = P2.Code LEFT JOIN Process PS ON P2.ProcessCode = PS.ProcessCode WHERE OH.JobStatus = 'IN PROCESS'
What i want to happen is Table_A will hold a recid and an update field. within the if statement it needs to JOIN with Table_B ON recid and check the value of one/two possible fields to determine if that recid goes to Table_F or Table_G
I need to get this INNER JOIN embedded in a nested if along with more INNER JOINs
INSERT BACKFILE_AP SELECT WORK_INTRO.RECID, WORK_INTRO.UPDATED FROM WORK_INTRO INNER JOIN SIF_DT1 ON WORK_INTRO.RECID = SIF_DT1.RECID WHERE SIF_DT1.ROUTE_CODE = 'BACKFILE' DELETE WORK_INTRO FROM WORK_INTRO INNER JOIN SIF_DT1 ON WORK_INTRO.RECID = SIF_DT1.RECID WHERE SIF_DT1.ROUTE_CODE = 'BACKFILE'
Heya - Very new here to SQL, but when I do this following query
SELECT ProjMgr, SUM(Fee) AS Fee FROM dbo.PR WHERE (ProjMgr = '00138') GROUP BY ProjMgr
I return these results:
ProjMgrFee 001389145297
Simple enough, so I flex my newbie SQL muscles and put in the last name instead of the ProjectManager's employee number
SELECT dbo.EM.LastName, SUM(dbo.PR.Fee) AS Fee FROM dbo.PR INNER JOIN dbo.EM ON dbo.PR.ProjMgr = dbo.EM.Employee WHERE (dbo.PR.ProjMgr = '00138') GROUP BY dbo.EM.LastName
And get these results
LastNameFee Boulet9145297
Okay, NOW I'm getting cocky. I try to bring in an amount indicating held labor from another table that will have multiple instances of the same number, called WBS1, and show a sum of values contained over months of history in a sum. Before I do that, I add the table, and then I'm stuck - look what happens to my fee column...any ideas?
SELECT dbo.EM.LastName, SUM(dbo.PR.Fee) AS Fee FROM dbo.PR INNER JOIN dbo.EM ON dbo.PR.ProjMgr = dbo.EM.Employee INNER JOIN dbo.LD ON dbo.PR.WBS1 = dbo.LD.WBS1 WHERE (dbo.PR.ProjMgr = '00138') GROUP BY dbo.EM.LastName
Select * from Fact1 UNION Select * from Fact2 JOIN
(Select top(col1),... from Fact3 INNER JOIN Table1 group by Col2 ) ON....
The above one was executing in 5 minutes
I changed the inner query to say
Select Quarter,top(col1),... from Fact3 INNER JOIN View1 group by Quarter,Col2
I have made sure that the inner query is returning the same set of rows before and after modification. But still the modified query runs for ever. I am refering 2 databases(both SQL Server 2000 databases, on the same server- including the current). Please also note that I had a inner join to a table which I have changed to a view in the inner query.
I suppose this is due to the change in the execution plan. What should I do to make this work?
Any ideas?
Prakash.P The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources!
I am very new to SQL and I have a question about inner joins. By using a lookup table and a row function, I have the following question and code. I am not sure if it right or not. I would appreciate any assistance:
For every type of food in the l_foods table, list the following:
The full name of the supplier from the l_suppliers table. The description of food from the l_foods table The price from the l_foods table plus the price_increase from the l_foods table; rename it to total_price
When price increase is null, assume that the 10 cents will be added to the price. Sort this information ty the total price.
SELECT a.supplier_name, b.description, b.price_increase AS total_price FROM l_suppliers AS a, l_foods AS b;
Orange- l_foods table Blue - l_supplier table Red - within both tables.
What is happening internally when a join is performed ?. Why there are two outer joins as both of them performing the same opertion?.Use left join key word and swap the tables , its will perform a right join .Is that correct?
What is happening internally when a join is performed ?. Why there are two outer joins as both of them performing the same opertion?.Use left join key word and swap the tables , its will perform a right join .Is that correct?
which web site can explain (entry level) difference between inner join and outer joins? I have looked many of them all the levels and their explanation is not easy to understand.
Hi who can help me figgering out what's wrong with the following code: CREATE PROCEDURE DBO.[612 - Update Aantal totaal Inhuizingen] AS UPDATE tblOpenVerhuizingenEventInhuizen SET tblOpenVerhuizingenEventInhuizen.BinnenNorm = Case When [tblWatervalVerhuizen].[Norm]='1' Then [BinnenNorm]+1 Else [BinnenNorm] End, tblOpenVerhuizingenEventInhuizen.OranjeNorm = Case When [tblWatervalVerhuizen].[Norm]='2' Then [OranjeNorm]+1 Else [OranjeNorm] End, tblOpenVerhuizingenEventInhuizen.BuitenNorm = Case When [tblWatervalVerhuizen].[Norm]='3' Then [BuitenNorm]+1 Else [BuitenNorm] End, tblOpenVerhuizingenEventInhuizen.Totaal = [Totaal]+1
WHERE (((tblOpenVerhuizingenEventInhuizen.id)=98)
AND
(([tblWatervalVerhuizen].[Categorie])>0)
AND
(([tblWatervalVerhuizen].[Type])='ZVIN') Or (([tblWatervalVerhuizen].[Type])='ZVIG'))) GO
He gives an error on the ')' but I think they are correct, if you take 1 away he gives an error that he doesn't know tblWatervalVerhuizen......THX!!!!
Hello everyone. What is meant by left join, right join, and cross join, etc...? Sorry for the question. Im using SQL 2005 for just 6 months, and only the INNER JOIN i know.
I understand that An inner join's ON condition retrieves only those records that satisfy the join condition. An outer join does the same thing but with the addition of returning records for one table in which there were no matching records in the other table.
Suppose I write the following Query, SELECT Customers.CustomerID, Customers.CompanyName, Orders.OrderID FROM Customers LEFT JOIN Orders ON Customers.CustomerID = Orders.CustomerID ORDER BY Customers.CustomerID
Do I need to declare the CustomerID as a Primary Key?
Is there any relation between Joins and Primary key declarations?
I'm quite new to Microsoft sql and so please forgive me if I appear a novice. However, could someone please give me help with the following 2 queries:
1. I need to retrieve the names of each ward that currently has at least 5 resident patients.
2. I need to retrieve the names and ward numbers of all patients that have been referred to the Dermatology department (this data is in the doctor specialism column).
The db has the following 4 tables:
doctor ( staff_no CHAR(3), doctor_name CHAR(12), position CHAR(15), specialism CHAR(15), PRIMARY KEY(staff_no) )
I'm trying to figure out how to sum amounts generated by an attribute in one table, when the attribute and amount generated require some Joins....
Each referral can refer more than one patient. Each patient can have multiple visits. Each visit generates one bill (one Total_Charges)
Select Referral.First_Name, Referral.Last_Name, Billing.Total_Charges as [Revenue] from Referral inner join Patient on Patient.Referral_ID = Referral.Referral_ID inner join PatientVisit on PatientVisit.Patient_ID = Patient.Patient_ID inner join Billing on Billing.Visit_ID = PatientVisit.Visit_ID group by sum(total_charges);
Right now this works fine, but every Referral who has sent multiple patients appears on a separate lines.
So a referral by the name of John Smith comes back like this:
John Smith 500.00 John Smith 300.00 John Smith 100.00
