Hi guys
I have a table which I need to analyze, what jobs this is working with, what stored procedure is calling this table etc. Is there any built-in function to show me or anybody know how to do it? This is my new job, and there are hundreds of stored procedures and jobs, do i really have to go thru one by one?
Please help.
Michelle
I want my query to list all SSNS that have more than one record in the table. I have this query:
Code:
SELECT SSN, name4, count(*) from [1099_PER]
group by SSN, name4
having count(SSN) > 1
It does retrieve the right SSNS and tells me how many times the SSN occurs in the table. However, I want my query results to display their full records.
For example
SSN NAME4 COUNT
123445555 WALTER - 4
I want the query to show me all four records for this SSN. I thought removing the count field would do this, but it still gives me only one instance of each SSN.
Hi,
Is there some kind of built in function in SQl to look for the presence of certain characters in a table collumn.I have to replace the text in those collumns with different text or just use substr, instr functions.
Thanks in advance
Dear sir or madam
I have a problem related to create or show relationship digram in sql server 2005. Especially, I want to show relationship diagram that I established in sqlserver 2000 in sql server 2005 but I can't and I don't how to do it.
I look forward to hearing.
Thank you in advance!
Best regard,
seyha moth
I have read all of the messages related to the above problem and none have solved the issue.
We have migrated a SQL 2000 database to SQL 2005. Detached from one and attached to the other and then based on some of the conversation I also used the SQL Server 2005's copy option and copied the database. Detached the old one and renamed the new database which was created in the copy process to the old name. Basically getting back to where I started. By the way there are no triggers generated during the process (as was mentioned), nothing to delete as some of the discussion was suggesting.
Big databse, lots of tables and stored procedures. All screens seem to work except when we try to update some data using a stored procedure which takes the data and updates the table. End up getting the above error during the execution. All used to work fine with SQL Server 2000. I have taken the SQL out of the stored procedure and executed manually and it worked but leaving the stored procedure alone and calling it with the updated data we get the INITCOLVS problem. The database is also set to be compatible to 90 so that suggestion also has not fixed the problem. Looking for additional suggestions and solutions. Some one was talking about making a dummy INITCOLVS function, have not done this yet but don't particularly like this suggestion, like to know the cause and the proper solution to the problem.
Again in summary:
Migrated SQL 2000 database to 2005
Have done the copy and attach process to make sure the whole conversion to SQL Server 2005 has taken place.
Have set the compatibility of the database to 90
Updates cause the above error.
Thanks in advance.
Don
how to format the last part of this query which comes from Access.:
SELECT Max(TITLOC.TitleLocID) AS MaxOfTitleLocID, TITLES.TitleID, TITLES.CustLName, TITLES.CustFName, TITLES.RecDT, TITLES.TitleID
FROM (TITLES_WARNING_SENT_qry RIGHT JOIN TITLES ON TITLES_WARNING_SENT_qry.TitleID = TITLES.TitleID) INNER JOIN TITLOC ON TITLES.TitleID = TITLOC.TitleID
WHERE TITLES_WARNING_SENT_qry.TitleID Is Null
GROUP BY TITLES.CustLName, TITLES.CustFName, TITLES.RecDT, TITLES.TitleID, TITLES.TitleID
HAVING (TITLES.RecDT<Date()-31)
I am getting:
'Date' is not a recognized built-in function name.
It is probably something simple but how would I go about converting this part "HAVING (TITLES.RecDT<Date()-31)" to something SQL Server is happy with?
I am trying to pull a report with average down time and I getting the error message "Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Line 4 'AVG' is not a recognized built-in function name." when I try to run the below query. How can I rephrase the AVG(DateDiff) line to calculate this for me?
SELECT
TT.PartNumber
,AVG (TT.TimeToRepair) as [Avg Time to Repair (Hours)]
,AVG(DateDiff (hour,TT.TimeDateReported,TT.DateClosed) as [Turnaround Time(Hours)])
FROM dbo.vt_TroubleTicket TT
WHERE TT.Closed = '-1'
and TT.DateClosed between '1/1/2013' and '1/1/2014'
and (TT.PartNumber = '12345')
GROUP BY TT.PartNumber
why I am getting this error on the SQl Server 2005 but not getting it on the SQL Server Express? and how to ifx?
Code Snippet
Msg 195, Level 15, State 10, Procedure sp_check_sp, Line 14
'OBJECT_SCHEMA_NAME' is not a recognized built-in function name.
this is my code:
Code Snippet
USE shefa
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- =============================================
-- Author: <Author,,Name>
-- Create date: <Create Date,,>
-- Description: <Description,,>
-- =============================================
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_check_sp]
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT DB_NAME(st.dbid) DBName
, OBJECT_SCHEMA_NAME(st.objectid, dbid) SchemaName
, OBJECT_NAME(st.objectid, dbid) StoredProcedure
, MAX(cp.usecounts) Execution_count
FROM sys.dm_exec_cached_plans cp
CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(cp.plan_handle) st
WHERE DB_NAME(st.dbid) IS NOT NULL AND cp.objtype = 'proc'
GROUP BY cp.plan_handle, DB_NAME(st.dbid),
OBJECT_SCHEMA_NAME(objectid, st.dbid),
OBJECT_NAME(objectid, st.dbid)
ORDER BY MAX(cp.usecounts)
END
Hello All,
Can anyone tell me what is error is and how to resolve it?
Thanks.
Hi Everyone-
i woder if someone know Built in function to search the occurence of char in string in T-SQL
and iam not talking about the Index of the first occurence (e.g CHARINDEX )
but it is more generic
i want to send to the function to ask about the index the second or the third or N occurence of the char.
and i wonder if it is built in for performance reasons
example
getseachIndex("M|d|d","|",2)==> the result is 4
I used a function to create dataset as below:
Public Function GetSQLDataSet(ByVal SQL As String) As DataSet
......
MyConnection = New SqlConnection(MyConnectionString)
MyCommand = New SqlCommand(SQL, MyConnection)
MyDataSet = New DataSet
MySQLDataAdapter = New SqlDataAdapter(MyCommand)
MySQLDataAdapter.Fill(MyDataSet)
......
End function
It works fine.
How to code a function to return a dataset in which there are two tables and relationship?
Hi.
I am a beginner of SQL server.
I have a table namely Customer with a column "CustomerName" with data type varchar and length 50.
Column Name-Customer Name
Data Type- varchar
Length- 50.
May I know how to ENSURE that every customer's name only contain ALPHABET and strictly avoid the numeric character and
other characters such as "&, !,#....".
Please help. Thank you.
I've 2 tables as follow, --> Full script and data as attachment, Scripts.zip
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[myMenuCollection](
[menuCollection_idx] [int] NOT NULL,
[parentID] [int] NULL,
[code]....
You can see - User select 3 Menu, which is the Menu Id is 1, 4, 10.If the Parent Id for Menu is 0, there is 1 record only to insert. If the Parent Id for Menu != 0, we've to make sure the Insert statement will insert the Parent Menu automatically
Based on Photo Above, there's 3 Menu is selected. But, in back-end - Insert statement will insert 4 record. Please see Menu Id = 10. The Parent Id = 9. So, we need to insert Menu Id = 9 automatically into myInsertedMenu table
I am trying to create a manifest for one of our clients and want to show the total qty for a product.
Below is my query, the quantity is listed below as TL.Quantity but I think I need to use a SUM function to show the total by product?
Select
TH.TransactionDate,
TH.Reference,
TransactionAccountNumber.AccountNumber as [Client Ref],
Product.Code,
Product.Description,
[Code] ....
Any idea of a function or procudure the returns the free space of a data file so I can see when I need to reclaim free space.
I have 12 month report and I need show volume and difference between current and prev month volume, what is the smart way to do this, do I need to put prev month value onto same row horizontally? I think should be some other smart way, I heard about LEAD function?
This what I think for now, It should be listed per ClientID also, in my example I have single ClientID for simplicity.
I tried to do LEAD but with not success..
/*
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#t') is not null drop table #T;
WITH R(N) AS
(SELECT 1 UNION ALL SELECT N+1 FROM R WHERE N <= 12 )
SELECT N as Rn,
10001 ClientID,
DATENAME(MONTH,DATEADD(MONTH,-N,GETDATE())) AS [Month],
[code]....
Hi, all experts here,
Thank you very much for your kind attention.
I am trying to create a new mining structure with case table and nested table, the case table (fact table) has alread defined the relationships with the nested table(dimension table), and I can see their relationship from the data source view. But why the wizard for creating the new mining structure showed that message? Why is that? And what could I try to fix it?
Hope it is clear for your help.
Thanks a lot for your kind advices and I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely,
I'd like the state of the function bars to stay at whatever it was as the user moves from one report to the next rather than opening to full each time a new report is opened. Can this be done through a setting or programatically at teh report level? Is there a <default_toolbars_OpenState> tag or something?
Thanks in advance.
(From an exchange originally posted on SQLServer.com, which wasn't resolved...)
To return views tailored to the user, I have a simple users table that holds user IDs, view names, parameter names, and parameter values that are fetched based on SUSER_SNAME(). The UDF is called MyParam, and takes as string arguments, the name of the view in use, and a parameter name. (The view the user sees is really a call to a corresponding table returning UDF, which accepts some parameters corresponding to the user.)
But the performance is very dependent on the nature of the function call. Here are two samples and the numbers reported by (my first use of) the performance monitor:
Call to table returning UDF, using local variables:
declare @orgauth varchar(50)
set @orgauth = dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'OrgAuth')
declare @since datetime
set @since = DATEADD(DAY,-1 * dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'DaysAgo'),CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)
select * from deptAwardsfn(@orgauth,@since)
[187 CPU, 16103 Reads, 187 Duration]
Call to same table returning UDF, using scalar UDFs in parameters:
SELECT *
from deptAwardsFn (
dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'OrgAuth')
,DATEADD(DAY,-1 * dbo.MyParam('DeptAwards', 'DaysAgo'),CURRENT_TIMESTAMP)
)
[20625 CPU, 1709010 Reads, 20632 Duration]
(My BOL documentation claims the CPU is in milliseconds and the Duration is in microseconds -- which I question.) Regardless of the unit of measure, it takes a whole bunch longer in the second case.
My only guess is that T-SQL is deciding that the parameter values (returned by dbo.MyParam) are nondeterministic, and continually reevaluates them somehow or other. (What ever happened to call by value?)
Can anyone shed some light on this strange (to me) behavior?
----- (and later, from me)---
(I have since discovered that the reference to CURRENT_TIMESTAMP in the function argument is the cause, but I suspect that is an error -- it should only capture the value of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP once, when making the function call IMHO.)
I have a table that I'm loading as part of a control flow that in turn is copied to a target table by using a data flow task. I am doing this because a different set of fields may be used from the source entry to create the target entry based on a field in the source table. That same field may indicate that multiple entries need to be created in the target table from one source table entry for which I use a multi-cast transformation.
The problem I'm having is that no matter how many entries there are in the source table, the OLE DB Source during execution only shows 7,532 entries being taken from the source table. If there are less than 7,532 entries in the source table, everything processes fine. More than 7,532 and the data flow task only takes 7,532 and then seems to hang. It also seems as though only one path of the multi-cast transformation is taken when the conditional split directs a source entry down that path.
Seems like a strange problem I know, but any insight anyone could provide is appreciated. Thanks.
How can I create a one-to-one relationship in a SQL Server Management Studio Express Relationship diagram?
For example:
I have 2 tables, tbl1 and tbl2.
tbl1 has the following columns:
id {uniqueidentifier} as PK
name {nvarchar(50)}
tbl2 has the following columns:
id {uniqueidentifier} as PK
name {nvarchar(50)}
tbl1_id {uniqueidentifier} as FK linked to tbl1.id
If I drag and drop the tbl1.id column to tbl2 I end up with a one-to-many relationship. How do I create a one-to-one relationship instead?
mradlmaier
I have four tables with relationships as shown. They have a circular relationship and so one of the relationships is forced to be inactive.
Operation (Commodity, OperationKey) ==========>
Commodity (Commodity)
/
/
|
|
Advice (OperationKey) ====== (inactive)=======>
Operation Commmodity (Commodity, OperationKey)
I have the following measure:
Advice No. Commodity:=CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS ( 'Advice' ),
USERELATIONSHIP(Advice[OperationKey],'Operation Commodity'[OperationKey]),
operation
)
However, the userelationship function does not override the active relationship between Operation & Advice and so the measure is limited to Advices directly filtered by the Operation table.
If I delete the relationship between Operation and Advice, then the measure works as expected i.e. Operation indirectly filters Operation Commodity which filters Advice.
Hello, I created some SQL 2005 tables using Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio. I need to get the script code of those tables. I was able to do that by right clicking over each table. But how can I get the code for the relationships between the tables? Can't I create relationships between two tables by using T-SQL? Thanks, Miguel
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi I have two tables:
1.) Operator-OperatorID{PK, int, not null}-OperatorName{varchar(100), not null}-Enabled{bit, not null}-PasswordChange{bit, not null}-BirthDate{datetime, not null}
2.) Password-PasswordID{PK, int, not null}-Password{varchar(50), not null}-ExpirationDate{datetime, not null}
I'm not sure how to design and layout these two tables. The layout of these two tables is completely flexible as the application has not been deployed. I'm open to any good suggestions.
For each Operator I want to stored up to 3 previous passwords plus their current password. The password change field is so that if the operator's password expires or gets reset, they will be forced to enter a new password. This is a simple internal company application, so password encrypting is not necessary. The ExpirationDate indicates the date that the password will expire.
Hope to hear from someone soon! Thank you!
Why is it not possible to define more than one relationship per table?
i have a primary table that i would like to cascade deletes to 2 other foreign tables in 2 separate relationships. why can't i do this and what are my alternatives?
thank you
i ve got a database that has a table...that table has a relationship between its primary key,and another field,actuelly i did it for doing menus and sub menus,so each menu has an ID say menuID and it has DEPTH and parentID which is the menuID of the parent...the problem is that i can not use "Cascade update Related Fields" or "Cascade Delete Related Records" which are really necessary ...for example when deleting parent ,not to have a child lost :)i hope i ll have an answer soon,and thanks in advancedPS: i am using MSSQL 2000 evaluation
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have two tables. Users and Projects and there is a many-to-many relationship.Ex. A user can be assigned into multiple projects.For the relationship table, should the table name be UserProjects or ProjectUsers?Also should it be singular or plural? (ex. UsersProjects or ProjectsUsers)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi, I come back again.
Can anyone help me to create table with many-to-many relationship. Here is my three tables
tbl_Networks
(
NID int identity(1,1) primary key,
NetworkName nvarchar(256)
)
tbl_Categories
(
CID int identity(1,1) primary key,
CateName nvarchar(256),
NID int
)
tbl_Sim
(
SID int identity(1,1) primary key,
NID int,
CID int,
NameOfSim nvarchar(256)
)
My problem is 1 value in tbl_Sim may have multiple values in table tbl_Categories and vice versal. And I don't know how to organise them
So I need some help...
Hello,
I have 3 tables: Articles, ArticlesTags and Tags.
ArticleTags relate Articles and Tags records.
When I try to delete a record in Tags I get the following error:
The DELETE statement conflicted with the REFERENCE constraint
"FK_ArticlesTags_Tags". The conflict occurred in database "MyDB", table "dbo.ArticlesTags", column 'TagID'.
The statement has been terminated.
What am I doing wrong?
Here is how I am creating my tables:
create table dbo.Articles
(
ArticleID uniqueidentifier not null
constraint PK_Article primary key clustered,
Body nvarchar(max) not null
)
create table dbo.ArticlesTags
(
ArticleID uniqueidentifier not null,
TagID uniqueidentifier not null,
constraint PK_ArticlesTags
primary key clustered (ArticleID, TagID),
constraint FK_ArticlesTags_Articles
foreign key(ArticleID)
references dbo.Articles(ArticleID)
on delete cascade,
constraint FK_ArticlesTags_Tags
foreign key(TagID)
references dbo.Tags(TagID)
)
create table dbo.Tags
(
TagID uniqueidentifier not null
constraint PK_Tag primary key clustered,
[Name] nvarchar(200) not null
)
Basically, what I need is:
1. If an Article is deleted then:
> Delete all records for that Article in ArticlesTags
> Don't delete any Tag in Tags.
2. If an Tag is deleted then:
> Delete all records associated with it in ArticlesTags.
> Don't delete any Article in Articles.
What am I missing?
Thanks,
Miguel
I
have 3 tables I am trying to relate for a music player. I was
following the example in the msdn however, my relationships do not seem
right. Here are tables i want to relate:
Table 1:
ArtistID
ArtistName:
Table 2:
RecordingID
RecordingName
ArtistID
Table 3:
TrackID
TrackName
TrackNumber
TrackLocation
RecordingID
So
the main idea here is that the foreign keys are recordingId and
artistID. So what i did is created the 3 tables and then make a
diagram to create the relationships. I then was reading this post:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=219696&SiteID=1
What
i want to do is use 2 different text boxes lets say and as i move from
the records in the Record_table (2) the corresponding artist will
change with it. However in the dataset the relationship looks like
this:
Artist -> Recording -> Track.... inorder for me to get
this relationship to work correctly i have to change all the
relationships in the dataset diagram. This way the dataset would look
like this: Track -> Recording ->Artist. This way i can use the
2 bindings to reference each other as stated in the link above. why
doesnt the relationship of the database know this already? why do i
have to change the relationship in the datasets.
I have two tables: ads and categories. I have an existing relationship: categories.id (PK) and ads.categoryid (FK). Now I want to create additional relationship with categories.id (PK) on ads.SecondCategoryID (FK). When I try to save it in SQL Manager I get the following error:
- Unable to create relationship 'FK_classifieds_Ads_classifieds_Categories2'. The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK_classifieds_Ads_classifieds_Categories2". The conflict occurred in database "mydb", table "dbo.classifieds_Categories", column 'Id'.
I am using tables with recursive relationships extensively. For example the table tbComponent has a primary key called Co_ID and a foreign key called Co_Co_ID which references the field Co_ID. This allows a component to have unlimited child components, and each child component can have an unlimited number of tiers of children. I have a few question for which I have seen no documentation on.
1. How can I create a view or a SP that will return a component record and all of its children and children's children records down to the last/lowest child record?
2. I need to be able to do a search in this table. Example:
Table: tbComponent
Columns: Co_ID Integer
Co_Co_ID Integer
Co_Name Text
Co_Attribute Text
Co_Category Text
Note: the data for Co_Category comes from a lookup table with also has a recursive relationship to itself where a category can have an unlimited number of tiers of children categories.
A typical group of records could be something like this:
Co_ID Co_Co_ID Co_Name Co_Attribute Co_Category
1 1 Car Blue Ford
2 1 Body Steel Parts
3 2 Door Front Parts
4 3 Invoice April 1 1999 Accounting
Ok, say there is over a million records in this table. Say I want to query this table and return all of the invoices for cars between March 1 1999 and May 1 1999. Say for example that there are less records where Co_Name has a value of Car then there are records with a value of Invoice, so logically I would set some kind of criteria to limit only invoices with where Co_Name = "Car". That's easy, I can return a result set of all the records Where Co_Name = "Car" and I can hold these in a view or a temp table. Now I need to query this View or temp table and see if it has any children records records Where Co_Name = "Invoice" . The problem is that the Invoice child could be a child record directly under the "Car" record, or 10 levels of children records down. The logic for this would be:
If Co_Name = "Car" Then Select * Where Co_Co_ID = 1, then take all of those record's values in Co_ID and run another statement Where Co_Co_ID = X and so on until there are no more children to search. If any of those records have a value of Invoice in Co_Name then return them.
Please don't give any speeches on Normal Relationship Database design suggesting a typical design using something like a Car table, a parts table, and a invoice table. I used the example above to demonstrate the dynamics of doing a search on a recursive relationship. I understand relationship theory and a recursive relationship is what we need to use in our situation.
Thanks for any and all input!
hi..
I would like to create a view for two tables which have a one-to-many relationship.
Code:
Table: Supplier
Supp_ID
1
Table:Supplier_category
Supp_ID,StockCategoryID
1,56
1,57
1,90
How can i create a view that has columns like below:
Supp_ID, Stock
1,[56,57,90]
Thanks in advance.