ArcServe Versus BackupExec

Jun 21, 1999

We currently use CA ArcServe (ArcServe 6.5 Enterprise and Single Server Editions) to backup our Windows NT files and MS-SQL Server databases. We have experienced significant reliability issues with ArcServe. Many times we have found ourselves rebuilding a corrupt ArcServe Job (ArcServe’s backup schedule) database. One of our NT server occasionally NT bug checks when ArcServe is performing backups. Occasionally ArcServe Jobs incorrectly reschedule themselves. Sometimes the Jobs do not complete but stay executing, not performing any work, and to cancel them may require a lot of effort. The ArcServe job DB repair utility generally does not work. The user interface is lacking. For example, the job scheduling options are very limited. CA tech support for this product has been poor. Because we have issues with ArcServe stability we are now evaluating Veritas (formally Seagate) Backup Exec for NT. What are other people’s experiences with these 2 products?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL Backups And BackupExec

Jul 3, 2001

I've recently set up Backup Exec on our SQL Server to backup our databases to DLT tape everynight. However when backing up the mdf and log files these are skipped because its says they are in use. However if you look in the Current Activity they are not in use. Plse could someone help/advise.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Backups V BackupExec

Jul 24, 2001

I'm reviewing our Backup Stategy. Can anyone advise me what advantage there is to using Backup Exec instead if just backing up the database and transaction logs straight to a DLT tape. Thanking you in advance.

View 1 Replies View Related

BackupExec & SQL Problem

Feb 26, 2002

We've been using BackupExec for a while to back up our SQL 2000 databases, but we've suddenly encountered a problem while trying to back up some of them. It seems that it won't back up databases that have a recovery model of "simple". Our Network Admin can't find anything in BackupExec that references Recovery Model, and we haven't changed the recovery model on the databases since they were created .....

Here's the error from the event log ... any ideas ?

An error occurred while executing the following query: "BACKUP DATABASE [TI] FILEGROUP='PRIMARY' TO virtual_device = 'BackupExecSqlAgent_PRIMARY_00'".
On server: "SQLDB-01".
SQL error number: "1070".
SQL error message: "The statement BACKUP DATABASE...FILE=<name> is not allowed while the recovery model is SIMPLE. Use BACKUP DATABASE or change the recovery model using ALTER DATABASE.
".

View 2 Replies View Related

BackupExec And Log Shipping

Oct 24, 2007

Hi

I currently have Backup Exec 11 w/ SQL Agent backing up my databases on a daily full, and 4 hour incremental basis. I want to configure log shipping as an additional level fault tolerance for my data. I have a few test databases setup with the log shipping and they are working correctly. But my question is related to Backup Exec.

Now that I have logs going to a second SQL server how will Backup Exec play with the primary server logs? Do I need to configure Backup Exec in a certain way, say do not truncate logs, etc? Or can I just keep the backups going as I have them and log shipping will just work at the same time.

TIA

Michael HamSeattle, WA

View 1 Replies View Related

Backup Agents ( Arcserve / Seagate)

Jan 21, 1999

Any thoughts or experiences (good or bad) on using the SQL agents from Arcserve or BackupExec for backups as opposed to standard dumps to disk?

I have always used dumps and taken the position that these tools work well, reliably and do not depend on another device ( tape device) for backups. Also they should be quicker and not cause any problem with table / log concurrency or delays in updates while the backup takes place.

Also, does anyone know how these products actualy maintain concurrency? Has anyone ever used one of these backups as a recovery?

Thanks in advance.

View 1 Replies View Related

Arcserve Backup Agent For SQL Server, Trouble?

Aug 7, 1998

This seems to happen just after our backups run. the result is that the SQL Server
Enterprise Manager can be brought up the next day but nothing can be accessed or
inquired of. The service is still running, the server is still up and rebooting the server
resolves the problem.

98/08/06 20:32:31.68 kernel dpdb_asyncread: mirror: Operating system error 6
(The handle is invalid.) encountered

Is anybody else using Arcserve Backup Agent for SQL Server for Windows NT, RAID 5?
Have you seen this? I`ve been to MS home page and on technet. No mention of this
problem. Next stop is Arcserve home page, if they have one. I have read the error logs
and this is the second time this has happened this week. Both times since we added
Arcserve to manage our MS SQL Server Database backups.

Best Regards and Thanks for your time.

View 1 Replies View Related

ArcServe Backups Now Show In SQL Restore Window --not Good

Feb 12, 2003

I'm not sure when it started, but...

It seems that very recently, the backups made during a nightly ArcServe tape backup procedure are showing up in the restore window on our SQL server. We don't want that! The application group makes it's own backup's to disk, and we want to see only them in the restore window.
(The tape ackup is a redudnant process, to be used if one of our on-hand disk backups are bad or non-existent, or if the DB needs to be recovered from an older date.)

What made the ArcServe files show up? How can we stop SQL server from thinking tyhat they are part of the backup set we are conccerned with?


Thanks.
MichaelGG

View 1 Replies View Related

Backing Up: Dumps Vs SQL Backup Agents Using BackupExec

May 31, 2000

I'm going back and forth on an issue and was looking for some outside observations. I have over a dozen SQL NT servers, both 6.5 and 7.0. On some servers I'm dumping the databases and backing up the dumps with Veritas BackupExec, on 4 (two SQL 6.5, two v7) I'm backing up with the Veritas SQL Backup Agent.

Obviously, if you don't have room to dump a database, you must use the backup agent. That is the case on one of my servers and becoming so on a second. But my personal preference is to do the dump/backup.

(as a side note, one server is not backing up correctly with the backup agent but ultimately that box will require it due to DB growth, so it is something that I have to resolve)

I like the dump system for a few reasons. I find it easier to load from a dump, particularly a single table. Likewise, I find it easier to copy a database by loading from a dump rather than going from a backup, but that's mainly because of BackupExec being a little bit strange on redirecting restores.

Here's my clincher. I find restores via the backup agent to be ridiculously slow. Let's say I have a 5gig DB that has 1.5gig in it. The dump size will probably be somewhere below 2gig. The restore via backup agent carefully writes the entire 5gig even though 3.5g of that is empty. This takes a lot of time. Add to that the "post-restore DBCC". I had such a restore take something on the order of 13 HOURS which, needless to say, conflicted with my nightly DBCC's and backups.


OK. End of rant. Any suggestions or thoughts on the subject?

View 1 Replies View Related

How SQL SERVER 2005 Backup &&amp; ArcServe Backup Coexist ??

Apr 15, 2008

I have only one tape drive.
My server is using the SQL server 2005 backup tool and arcserve backup tool to backup different files .

Everytime I need to disable and enable the tape device driver (in device manager /windows) before I can use SQL server 2005 backup tool.

Everytime I need to disable and enable the tape device driver (in device manager /windows) before I can use arcserve backup tool.

It seems that the tape device resource is held by softwares even the tape drive is not in use.

What should I do to make the tape drive shared by different softwares?


Regards,
Manuel

View 2 Replies View Related

@@ Versus @ In T-SQL

Apr 13, 2006

I'm sorry to be ignorant on this point. It seems trivial, but what's the difference between @@ and @ when using variables in T-SQL? I have a developer that always uses @@ for local variables and @ for reference variables (meaning variables declared as parameters for a stored procedure or function).

Is that purely stylistic? Is it a holdover from some previous version? Or is it a legitimate best practice that I've not seen before?

My google-shui is weak today; I found nothing when searching.

Regards,

hmscott

View 5 Replies View Related

SP2 Versus SP1

Feb 21, 2007

Do you need SP1 installed before installing SP2?


http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/servicepacks/sp2.mspx

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL - SP1 Versus SP2

Apr 13, 2007

Hi everybody. I am just confused. What is the difference between SQL SP1 and SP2 ? Can anyone explain further to me.

Thanks.
-Ron-

View 10 Replies View Related

NOT EXISTS Versus NOT IN

Jan 30, 2004

I have two tables :

tableA
a_id (int)
value (varchar 255)

tableB
id (int)
a_id (int)
b_id (int)
c_id (int)
d_id (int)

Both these tables contain considerable amounts of rows, but over time tableA will end up containing orphaned values (i.e. the a_id is not used in tableB) and this problem cannot be rectified by setting, for example, cascade deletes.

To fix this problem I decided to write a simple stored procedure to purge all values in tableA where its a_id is not used in tableB :

DELETE FROM tableA WHERE a_id NOT IN (SELECT a_id FROM tableB)

Now although the following document relates to postgres :

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2003-12/msg00174.php

I was interested to find out if I should be wary of using NOT IN in my query.

View 6 Replies View Related

SET Versus SELECT

Feb 12, 2007

Hello,

I have an Output parameter as follows:
@Feedback INT OUTPUT

I want to give it a value and return it.
What is the difference between using:

SELECT @Feedback = -1
RETURN @Feedback

And

SET @Feedback = -2
RETURN @Feedback

Thanks,
Miguel

View 19 Replies View Related

SSIS Versus DTS

Jun 20, 2007

Hello,



I wonder if anyone else out there has the same impression that I have: I find that DTS works much better than SSIS.



I find that DTS is so easy to use and reliable: it gets the job done and fast! On the other hand, SSIS seems to be so needlessly complex that it takes hours of troubleshooting just to get it to work, and sometimes it doesn't work at all. For example I have just spent hours trying to get SSIS to import a flat file with 300,000 rows. It just crashes and doesn't even give an error message so that one can fix it. On the other hand I have just now successfully accomplished the same task with DTS and it took me 5 minutes!



I honestly don't see a valid reason for using SQL Server 2005 instead of 2000. So far it's much more productive to use 2000.



I hope Microsoft can clarify this issue.



Regards,



Jerome Smith

View 8 Replies View Related

ADO.NET DATAVIEWS VERSUS SQL ENGINE

Jan 4, 2006

Hi All,
Any suggestions / views / help on below question would be welcomed.
I am building an asp.net 2.0 application with sql 2005 express as back end. My back end has 3 major tables which are:
tblArticles - saves basic info on articles posted by user (like articleid, title, short desc, rating, views, etc)
tblCategories - saves various categories and their hierarchies (id, parented, name, etc)
tblArticleCategories - saves info on which articles fall in which categories (like articleid, categoryid)
as of now, i am caching all rows from the first 2 tables, but i am in a bit of doubt for caching the third table (tblArticleCategories), although data in this table wont change very often and also this table will just have 2 columns and not many rows as well and this is a good target for caching,
but the reason I am in a bit of doubt to cache this table is, when my website visitor clicks on any category link in the category tree view, I need to use an inner join across all these 3 tables to locate and return all articles found in that particular category.
But I can do the same thing without hitting the database as I already have 2 of the required 3 tables in my cache, I can simply add the third table to my cache and then using the dataview objects rowfilter property on these 3 cached tables, I can very well get the appropriate results.
But I wonder which of the 2 methods would you prefer and suggest, I mean do you feel that just to save hits against the database, I am going to far and doing a lot of crap using the dataview (which might not be as efficient as sql engine) or you feel that the inefficiency of the dataview will still win compared to the cost of hitting the database for this
Thanks in advance, bye take care
Raj Chaudhari, Mumbai, India (MCAD.NET)
www.xtremebiz.biz

View 2 Replies View Related

Trigger Versus SQL Insert

Feb 16, 2006

Hello all,
I have table 'statistics' which holds information about another table, i.e. number of rows belonging to each user.
Would I be better off using a trigger after each insert to increment a certain row.
Or would I be better off selecting the data by means of an sql statement and updating the column whenever the statisitcs page is requested.
Does sql provide any methods which allow a column to count other rows or columns?
 

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Versus Informix

Oct 25, 2000

Hi all,

Anyone here ever used the Informix database and can give me some differences between Informix and SQL.

One of our users is thinking about purchasing a COTS product that only supports an Informix database. I need to convince the user to evaluate other rival applications that can support SQL and need some arguments in favor of not going with Informix.

Any ideas appreciated,
Faustina

View 6 Replies View Related

NEtwork Techs Versus DBA's

Jun 25, 2004

I gotta network tech that I work with from time to time. Hes gonna migrate a access database over to sql. He says it should be easy its a flat file can just do it through enterprise manager. I warned him that datatypes can become an issue (kinda have to know your db) he looked at me like I'm an idiot and proceeded to migrate the tables over to sql...Needless to say he got alot of error messages and is now totally confused. Now let me ask some experts who really Know Databases, do you ever have problems with Network Techs who think they know all

View 14 Replies View Related

Size Versus Space Available

Dec 7, 2005

We are planning hardware purchases (more is better). One of our databases is 131 gigs in size and has 45 gigs of 'space available'. I'm not a very experienced SQL Server person, but this seems like quite a bit of 'space available'

1) Is there a way to regulate the amount of 'space available'?
2) are there any rules of thumb for how 'space available' there should be?

Appreciate any feedback or help.

Ray

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 And 32-bit Versus 64-bit

Dec 14, 2006

Hi all,

we are about to purchase new database servers and have been offered a good deal on 64-bit Xeon machines. At present we run SQL 2000 on Windows Server 2003 both of which are 32-bit versions.

Is there any problem using our current 32-bit Server software on the 64-bit machines (apart from not being able to utilise its full power)? I'm assuming the SQL 2005 licenses are the same price regardless of 32-bit or 64-bit version. If we buy a 64-bit SQL Server version license are we going to get the best out of it on a 32-bit Windows Server edition?

tia - Matt

View 1 Replies View Related

Cursor Versus While Loop

Oct 29, 2007

I have always been told that Cursors create a lot of overhead and consume a lot of system resources. Is it faster to store the data in a temp table and loop through it by using Select Top 1 and Delete statements or by using a static, Forward-Only Cursor? Both ways store the data in TempDB, but doesn't the While Loop statement generate more IO's than the Cursor? In theory, I am thinking that the Cursor is better. Any info will be appreciated.

Thanks!!

View 2 Replies View Related

Nvarchar Versus Varchar

Oct 10, 2007

I have table with a field defined as nvarchar. I want to change it to varchar. I have a stored procedure which defines the parameter @strCall_desc as nvarchar(4000). Are there going to be ay problems with running this sp if I just change the field type as described.

TIA

View 6 Replies View Related

Update Versus Append

Jul 23, 2005

I have a database that is being used as sort of a reports datawarehouse. I use DTS packages to upload data from all the differentsources. Right now I have it truncating the tables and appending withfresh data. I was considering using updates instead and my question waswhich is more efficent?

View 3 Replies View Related

Update Versus Rebuild

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,Is there ever a case where a total rebuilt is preferable to anupdate? I am talking in the context of a data warehouse.Many thanksSam

View 1 Replies View Related

Return Versus Raiserror

Jul 20, 2005

I am trying to get a better understanding of when to use return (witha print statement) and when to use raiserror.* Both statements can be used with stored procedures while only returncan be used with functions.* With raiserror it is easy to have multiple errors thrown. (If boththe calling procedure and called procedure both try to handle error)Wow. Thought I could think of more. So that really leaves me with verylittle info on the proper use of these two statements.

View 2 Replies View Related

Sp_addextendedproperty Versus Sysproperties

Jul 20, 2005

I have been searching for a way to associate a description with acolumn name. I have come across multiple posts regarding thisquestion. Problem is that I have seen two different answers.One post mentioned using the undocumented system table namedsysproperties while other posts mentioned using thesp_addextendedproperty (and fn_listextendedproperty).Which one and why one over the other?Thanks.

View 1 Replies View Related

Joins Versus Relationships

Jul 20, 2005

If a database has relationships establshed between all of the tablesvia primary and foreign key constraints, why isn't is possible to makea SELECT statement across multiple tables without using a JOIN?If the system knows the relationsip schema already why are JOINSrequired?Thanks,HC

View 4 Replies View Related

SSIS Versus Coding.

Jun 25, 2007

This question probably overlaps a few different topic areas.



As I will be required to work with both Oracle and SQL Server I will be in a difficult position with SSIS(due to it's change in distribution).



Therefore I am having to look at alternatives.



With coding a can open a text file and parse it reasonably to my satisfaction. However getting the data into the database is incredibly slow.



I am using an Insert into for each line, which I am sure everone will shake their head over. This seems to be pretty slow even using transactions.



Is there any scope in using data tables or have the read on one thread and write on another.



Other than that is there an Oracle equivalent of SSIS which comes (probably get shot for asking that on a microsoft web site, but would probably get shot if I asked on Oracle forums as well).



In the past we had reasonable results in outputting to csv and then doing some sort of bulk insert, messy and irritating though this may be.



Any ideas on this area will be gratefully accepted.

View 2 Replies View Related

DT_I8 Versus DT_UI8

Mar 13, 2007

Can some one tell me in basic terms the difference between a signed and unsigned integer? When would you decided to use one over the other? I'm looking for it more in layman terms than a technical bit level discussion.

View 9 Replies View Related

Certificates Versus Keys

Jul 14, 2005

Hi,

View 3 Replies View Related

Authentication - Windows Versus Sql

Feb 23, 2008

Can anyone give me some advice on using authentication. What is the best way to go with a database on a server and why? And in order for you to use sql authentication, do you have to change the registry? I have seen some posts that seem to say you can only use it by changing the registry.

So if anyone can gie me the pro's and con's i would appreciate it.

Thanks
Jeff

View 7 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved