Automatically Sort Table When Table Is Opened In Project
Jul 20, 2005
Hi all,
We recently upsized two Microsoft Access Databases to SQL. We're
using an ADP (2002) as the front end.
All the conversion issues have been resolved, except for one:
Whenever we insert a record into a table, the table isn't sorted by
primary key like I would expect. Instead, the record can be found at
the end of the table. This makes finding a particular record
(especially as time goes on) very difficult.
I've tried eliminating all indexes except for the primary key, and
also writing AFTER INSERT triggers, but the table still does not sort
correctly.
I am having a table called as status ,in that table one field is there i.e. currentstatus. the rows which are having currentstatus as "ticket closed",i want to move those rows into other table called repository which is having same table structure as status table. I can do programatically. but is there any way for every 3 months system has to check and do this action means moving to repository table automatically?
I have a Visual Studio 2005 solution which contains a Sql Server Integration Services (SSIS) project.
In this solution I have explicitly set a Web application project as startup project, but whenever I edit a DTS package within the SSIS project, VS automatically sets the SSIS project as startup project and the package I edit as startup object.
Needless to say, this may cause some really unwanted incidents when running the solution - thinking that you're about to run the Web application project (that was explicitly set as startup project), but instead, you run the edited package in the SSIS project.
Is there any way to avoid having the SSIS project automatically setting itself as startup project, any workaround here at all? :)
From last 1 week or so, i have been facing very strange problem with my sql server 2005s database which is configured and set on the hosting web server. Right now for managing my sql server 2005 database, i am using an web based Control Panel developed by my hosting company.
Problem i am facing is that, whenever i try to modify (i.e. add new columns) tables in the database, it gives me error saying that,
"There is already an object named 'PK_xxx_Temp' in the database. Could not create constraint. See previous errors. Source: .Net SqlClient Data Provider".
where xxx is the table name.
I have done quite a bit research on the problem and have also searched on the net for solution but still the problem persist.
In SQL Server 2000, I have a parent table with a cascade update to a child table. I want to add a record to the child table whenever I add a table to the parent table. Thanks
I have a view saved on server - mhsvi-datawarehousedatawarehouse.This view, in it's TSQL connects to a databasethat is set up as a linked server. That server is mhsvi-sql2008ainstance1.When I try to add the view to Excel in order to automatically refresh for users as a report - I get the following error - (I get it as well)
The query did not run, or the database table could not be opened.Check the database server or contact your database administrator. Make sure the external database is available and hasn't been moved or reorganized, then try the operation again.I have access to the database where the view is saved and the database that the TSQL calls.
Ok, I'm really new at this, but I am looking for a way to automatically insert new records into tables. I have one primary table with a primary key id that is automatically generated on insert and 3 other tables that have foreign keys pointing to the primary key. Is there a way to automatically create new records in the foreign tables that will have the new id? Would this be a job for a trigger, stored procedure? I admit I haven't studied up on those yet--I am learning things as I need them. Thanks.
Hi, This is my problem : I have listBox1, listBox2 controls bound to sqldatasource1 and sqldatasource2. I wrote one stored procedure to retrieve data from my sql database like : select Id, Name,Address,Amount from KalakaDB
Now I want my listBox1 to display Name By name and my listBox2 to display Amount by decrease order how can i connect my sqldatacontrol to the stored procedure ?
When you create a SSIS Project in Visual Studio and start adding many, many SSIS and several people do it, they are not being sorted when they get loaded into Visual Studio environment, unlike other objects such as web forms in ASP.NET or classes. as you can imagine, if you have about 100 of SSIS, it makes it very hard for anyone to find one SSIS to alter it.
all these packages are being stored in some xml file, right? so, my boss wants me to write a tool that will open this file and order SSIS by names to make it easier for anyone in a team. i was wondering if anyone has done something like this already, or started. any leads, comments will be appreciated.
I have quite a long SP which is made up of various tables, temp tables, etc.
I am creating 11 physical tables which i am using to create a DTS package to auto output to an excel spreadsheet (template for a report).
The problem is although i have used ORDER BY statements to sort the data in ascending order the data isnt sorted.
Heres an example of one of the table outputs
--Create Table of Managers DELETE FROM Weekly_Term_Code_Output7 INSERT INTOWeekly_Term_Code_Output7 SELECT #Temp_Agent.Manager FROM #temp5 INNER JOIN #Temp_Agent ON #temp5.agent_login = #Temp_Agent.agent_login WHERE (NOT (#Temp_Agent.Manager IS NULL)) GROUP BY #Temp_Agent.Manager ORDER BY #Temp_Agent.Manager
ive also tried placing an order by statement in the output to excel in the DTS package but this also doesnt work?
I am adding this to my c#.Net app...How can I sort all rows in a table?After it is sorted, will it remain so after i do a cnSQL.Close();so that when I then do a:string strSQL = "SELECT InvoiceNumber " +"FROM tblPrintInvoice " ;Is it still sorted for me to do a:drSQL.Read?Thanks,Trint
We have developped an ETL. For development we used small test files (10 000 rows) to test if it works correctly. This runs in less then a minute
In Test we are using a file which contains all rows (7 million). We did twice a test and we first stopped the process after a week and the 2nd time we stopped the process after a weekend.
We are able to trace the problem to the point where it has to sort the tables.
The proces is pretty simple. We use two connectors to directly connect to the tables. Then we have two blocks to sort the data. And then we have one block to merge the data.
Should we which to let SQL do the sorting ? Since it is in staging is has no index on that column. A select on the tables with an order by takes 3 minutes to return all those rows.
Any idea's ?
Also is there a page with the best practices for ETL ?
I have a table report that lists the prior 12 months of sales data. I'd like the report to display in reverse order from current month back. When I sort decedning by month it puts the months in reverse alphabetic order. How can I sort by numeric order?
I have a "Sales shipments" report with several colums. I want a parameter for the user so he choose how to sort. I have two colums in my report I want to sort on: ItemNumber and DeliveryDate.
I added a Report Parameter UserSort with two labels (and values): Item (ItemNumer) and Date (DeliveryDate).
Does anyone know if the results from a query run in QA automatically go into a tempoary table? For instance if ive just run a query that took 5 minutes but it was a normal select query and after it ran i realised i wanted to query the results could i run a simple command to mke a copy of the result set rather than run the original query into a temp table that would then take a few minutes again?
When the new month comes I want the table to alter the columns automatically instead of manual how we do it now. The new Month table should delete [02-2015] and replace it with [03-2015].
hi, i have 2 tables where i require an unique ID over both. I googled a bit and discovered that i need to create an own table for this which holds the last value (because mssql unfortunately does not support sequences).
i did this but my problem now is that i want to automatically set the id of my tables with a trigger on INSERT.
hope this is possible .. or anyone have other suggestions? thanks a lot!
i am currently trying to port a "Business Objects" report to SQL Server Reporting Services.
in B.O., there is a possibility to define the order of the table values by previewing the table values and moving them up or down.
Example : the dataset contains data for 3 items, so in the Custom Sort window, I will see these 3 items and I can order them by moving them up or down in a listbox.
I'm trying out the interactive sort feature (and have searched high and low for this answer), but can not make the sorting work if I have the data in the table grouped. If I remove the group, the sorting works fine but the output is not acceptable due to the duplicated records in the list.
I am new to SQL server, but I need to develop a "big" application with it. Here's my application requirements:
1)Create a table, say TableA, in SQL server 7 or 2000 database,say DB1, based on another Oracle database,say DB2, on a remote server. Update TableA based on DB2 every day in some specific time. 2) If new records are inserted into the TableA,some other tables needed to update in DB1. At the same time, an e-mail will send to three receipts.
I have no idea of which function or method I can use to fulfill the requirements. Can any experts here give me some advice, detail explanation would be grateful.
I am very well versed on manipulating data using passthrough queries through access or the command object in ADO/VBA but this problem requires a sql server side solution and I have been assigned the task
Scenario
Access via an ODBC link cannot view Sql table data that uses a BigInt as a primary key. Access can update the data, insert data ands delete data to these tables - but viewing (by design) returns the actual count of the rows but each field is populated with #deleted.
I can view the table data if I use a passtyhrough query but performing row level and field level edits from there is impossible. Not all people have Studio manager so that is not an option.
We are moving away from our legacy application and the development company has already developed the schema using the BigInt so changing that to a numeric or integer is out of the question. My boss has determined that using a set of bridge tables with identical tables in a different database where we replace the bigint with int will work - we can view the data in the "bridged" database and even update it from select queries and simply by opening the table in view mode from Access.
Here is the hard part (for me) because I have never done this. I can write SQL and understand the security/roles etc, but I have never administered SQL server regarding server side triggers and stored procedures - I have always used the command object or passthrough queries to deal with sql stored procedures. I need to either
A)Create some trigger behind the tables in my bridge table that will fire a stored procedure to replicate the data to the bigint database. They are both on the same sever.
B)Somehow create a "mirror" that always replicates from my bridge database tables (5 of them) to the new database.
First of all I want to apologize if I am in the wrong forum. I am new to SQL Server. I have a table with a field containing email address from user input. Is there a build-in function or script in SQL Server 2005 that I can send a template of a email message to users? If not in what way can I acheive this?
Is there a way to change the order that "select * from #table" returns data? It doesn't appear to return data in the same order that it was inserted into the table. This wasn't a problem with the same code in SQL Server 2005.
i have table in sql and every month i am appending new data in this table, but i want to sort data Culumn Name "account_no' from smallest to largest, and whenever i append new data to this table it auto sort every time,
Hello I have a table with a RowNumber Group which shows 10 rows in each page. it works fine. in the next step i put an Interactive sorting on one column. i expect that the sorting is on the table no regarding the presentation which shows only 10 rows. in reality what happens is that the table was sorted seperated for each part of the 10 rows table, and no for the whole table.
does any one have a suggestion how to force the Interactive Sort , sorting he Whole table first and only later to present 10 rows each page (use the group expression)
Hello, I am using SQL Server 2005 and ASP.NET 2.0. We have a very simple content management system where we have to keep track of date last modified for each row in all of our content tables. I know there's a "timestamp" datatype that is used for replication scenarios, but is there anything similar that I can use to set up a date_modified column for each of my content tables that will automatically update with GETDATE() whenever anything in a given row is updated? Or do I have to create a date_modified column of smalldatetime datatype and write a trigger on update for EVERY single table of content that I have in the database? It seems there should be an easier way to do this than to write 20 triggers for my 20 content tables. Thanks!
I'm trying to update (increment) Company.SumtotalLogons from CompanyUsers.NumberOfLogons where CompanyUsers.CompanyID = Company.CompanyID
I'd like to either write a formula (if it is even possible to fire a formula from one table update/insert to increment a field in another table), or a stored procedure that triggers an auto update/append into Company.SumTotalLogons
I know this is possible in access, so i'm wondering how to go about it in ms-sql?
I have some database tables, and each one of them have a creation_date and modified_date in them. I was trying to figure out a way where when a row in one of these tables is changed using Enterprise Manager (Database -> Tables -> select table -> right click -> select all rows -> change a field in a row inside a table), is there a way apart from triggers, such that the "modified_date" column for that row get changed to 'getdate()' (rather picks up the current datetime).
