BEGIN TRANSACTION Or BEGIN DISTRIBUTED TRANSACTION
Jul 20, 2005
Hi have have two linked SQL Servers and I am trying to get things working
smootly/quickly.
Should I be using 'BEGIN TRANSACTION' or 'BEGIN DISTRIBUTED TRANSACTION' ?
Basicly, these SPs update a local table and a remote table in the same
transaction. I cant have one table updated and not the other. Please dont
say replicate the tables either as at this time, this is is not an option.
I have for example a number of stored procedures that are based around the
following:
where ACSMSM is a remote (linked) SQL Server.
if (@@error <> 0)
begin
rollback tran mytran
set @strResult = 'Failure'
set @strErrorDesc = 'Fail @ Step :' + @strStep + ' Error : ' + @@Error
return -1969
end
else
begin
set @strResult = 'Success'
set @strErrorDesc = ''
end
-- commit tran if we started it
I have this code DECLARE @tempTableName VarChar(50)SET @tempTableName = NEWID() CREATE TABLE #@tempTableName( State Char(2), Billed Money, AslCode VarChar(10))INSERT INTO #@tempTableName EXEC GetRecords '2/1/2008' which gives me this error when I run The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]. GetRecords does a select * from a linked server's table. Which is working fine but if I try to do an insert (into temp table) then I get the error. Any help?
I am receiving the following error when I run a stored procedure:Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Procedure spXXXXThe SP inserts data into a local (sql 2000) table from a remote sql2000 database. The SP works fine until I add a trigger to thedestination. The contents of the trigger do not appear to matter, as Ihave tried removing everything but one line, which is just a declarestatement. Updating the table with the trigger (even the full trigger)in place does not cause an error. Running the SP without the triggeron the table does not cause the error.I have the exact same setup on another server. Both the SP and thetrigger are IDENTICAL. This setup works on one server, but not theother. The only difference I can see is that the non-working server isWindows 2000 Server, while the working server is Windows 2003 Server.Any idea what's going on here?Thanks in advance.Eric
I'm having issues with a query to a view that references a view on a linked server, that in turn references a view on a third server.
Query to view on Server A --> View on Server B --> View on Server C
I can query from A to B using the linked server. I can query from B to C. I can query from A to C.
All servers at the same location on the same domain.
I cannot query a view on A, that references a view on B, where the view on B references a view/table on C
Each linked server configuration uses "Be made using this security context", with the user specified being 'sa'. I was hoping to get security out of the equation for debug purposes, hence the sa use.
I have tried from Query Analyzer using both windows and sql auth.
MSDTC is running on all servers as local system.
The full error returned is:
Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction. OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]. [OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
I have been attempting to set up a linked server in SQL Server 2000 to point to an Oracle database (a very old Oracle database, v7!).
The linked server set up works fine. Then I created a database on the same SQL Server. Within that database I created a view which reads information from a view in the Oracle database (linked server). When I attempted to create this view in Enterprise Manager, I get the following error:
"The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'MSDAORA' was unable to begin a distributed transaction."
And so I created the view in Query Analyzer. This worked perfectly, no errors, and I can now go into Enterprise Manager and call up the view, which happily goes off to the view in the Oracle linked server and pulls back the info. BUT, when I attempt to do the same thing through an application on a different machine (using OLE Db, and a UDL to connect) the same error as above appears.
Does anyone know what this error means, and where I went wrong? Any help greatly appreciated. My view onto the linked server looks like this:
"CREATE VIEW dbo.NLPG_VIEW AS SELECT * from openquery(sadaslink, 'select * from NLPG_VIEW')"
Many thanks in advance for your wisdom!
P.S I wondered whether I need to check if the distributed transaction co-ordinator is running but don't know how. Thanks,
I have 3 development SQL Servers A, B & C, all running SQL 2000 sp3 and Windows 2003. Servers B & C have a linked server pointing to A, and A has one pointing to B & C. The linkedservers all have RPC , RPC out enabled. I have a stored procedure called test on server A.
When the Insert....Exec code above is ran from server B it works fine, however when I run it from Server C, I get error 7391 The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction. [OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ] OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]
But regular linked server calls (directly to tables) and openquery calls work fine from either server...
Eg insert into #tmp Select top 5 first_name, last_name from ServerA.db1.dbo.people
--and this works also
insert into #tmp Select * from openquery(ServerA, 'Exec db1.dbo.test')
Both servers (B & C) appear to be configured the same, and I have reconfigured MSDTC on all three boxes through control panel and component manager, have tried using SET xact_abort, SET implicit_transactions, registry hacks (TurnoffRPCsecurity), basically everything listed on Microsoft, and everything I've been able to find in these groups.
Hello!I have an Oracle linked server connected through MSDAORA. Linked serverqueries work perfectly - the "openquery" ones as well as the4-part-named ones.The problem I have is with embedding the queries within SQL Servertriggers.Trigger:CREATE TRIGGER tgTest ON [dbo].[test]FOR INSERT, UPDATE, DELETEASselect * from openquery(LS, 'select * from ORACLE_TEST')executing "delete from test" in SQL Query Analyzer raises this error:Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Procedure tgTest, Line 5The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider'MSDAORA' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'MSDAORA'ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d01b].I've tried almost every solution I found online, but nothing helped:(This looked promissing: http://tinyurl.com/nk2wd , but it didn't get meany futher.Maybe someone can get me through the troubleshoot mentioned in thatlink:- check if DTC running properlyHow do I check that? If I open the "Support services" in EnterpriseManager and right-click the "Distributed Transaction Coordinatior" Ican stop the service, what indicates the service is running, but isthere anything else I should check? I have 0 items in the right windowpane of the DTC item, is it OK?- registry setting as discussed earlierThe following Registry Keys should be entered:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftMSDTCMTxOCI ]"OracleXaLib"="oraclient8.dll""OracleSqlLib"="orasql8.dll""OracleOciLib"="oci.dll"My entries are:"OracleOciLib"="ociw32.dll""OracleSqlLib"="SQLLib18.dll""OracleXaLib"="xa73.dll"Are they OK?- check if Mtxoci.dll is loadedThere is a Mtxoci.dll in my system32 dir, but how do I tell if it'sloaded? Should I regsvr32 it?- SET XACT_ABORT ON should be use in your SQL statement, for example:SET XACT_ABORT ONBEGIN DISTRIBUTED TRANSELECT statementCOMMIT TRANI've tried that, both in trigger but also surrounding the query thatfires the trigger.Am getting deseperate - please help. Will send candies!TIA
I have a database containing my own tables and data and I wanted tobe able to query this against an accountancy program which has an ODBCdriver. This was never a problem with MS Access and Jet but I hit Jet'slimitations and have moved to SQL.Creating my own SQL database was no problem, but I was unsure of thebest way to be able to be able to have my SQL tables and my accountancysoftware tables appearing in the same Access front end.I created a linked server to the accountancy program. This wassuccessful in that I could see all the tables below the linked server inenterprise manager.My problem occurs when I try to bring the data from these tablesinto my SQL database.I create a new view in my database:-SELECT *FROM OPENQUERY(SAGE_SERVER, 'SELECT * FROM STOCK')(My linked server is called 'SAGE_SERVER' and I am trying to retrieveall columns from the STOCK table.)I then try to save this view and get the following errors.ODBC Error: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]The operationcould not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'MSDASQL' was unableto begin a distributed transaction.[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]OLE DB Error Trace[OLE/DBProvider 'MSDASQL' ITransactionJoi JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].Thanks in advance,Marcus Thornton.
We have a rather large environment and have just a couple of boxes out there that we are getting cannot begin distributed transaction on inserts and updates but works fine on selects. Inserts and updates work fine outside the begin tran / commit so it's definitely DTC
We have checked the configuration on and the source box is set to No authentication required same for destination.
We have: Verified credentials running the service, changed them, same problem. Uninstalled and re-installed MSDTC per Microsoft instructions.
Have run all the tools for checking DTC DTCPing etc and followed those procedures which typically in the past has resolved any DTC issues. Other than swapping out the offending pc for a new one we are at a loss.
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction. [OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ] OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].
I have a Insert statement which i am using to insert data into a remote server from my local server. I have added the remote server as a linked server in my local server but when i try to execute the statement i am getting the above mentioned error. I am using Windows Enterprise Edition 2003 and SQL Server 2000.
I have also enabled the Allow InBound and Allow OutBound in the security configuration of My Computer properties but still i am facing the same problem. Kindly let me know how to resolve this issue.
Hello, I've a problem with a software developed in C# with the framework 2.0. This is the error I receive : The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX_LINKED_SERVER" was unable to begin a distributed transaction. OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX_LINKED_SERVER" returned message "No transaction is active.". If I try directly to restart the process, it works fine. Is there someone who can help me ? This is the process 1. In C# --> Call of a Query : select from the linked server (db in sql 2005) and insert into a table SQL 2005 2. In the C# --> using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope()) and insert in a table in SQL 2005 which is link server Thank in advance.
I'm receiving the below error when trying to implement Execute SQL Task.
"The ROLLBACK TRANSACTION request has no corresponding BEGIN TRANSACTION." This error also happens on COMMIT as well and there is a preceding Execute SQL Task with BEGIN TRANSACTION tranname WITH MARK 'tran'
I know I can change the transaction option property from "supported" to "required" however I want to mark the transaction. I was copying the way Import/Export Wizard does it however I'm unable to figure out why it works and why mine doesn't work.
How do I make use of begin transaction and commit transaction in SSIS.
As am not able to commit changes due to certain update commands I want to explicitly write begin and commit statements. but when i make use of begin and commit in OLEDB commnad stage it throws an error as follows:
Hresult:0x80004005
descriptionyntax error or access violation.
its definately not an syntax error as i executed it in sql server. also when i use it in execute sql task out side the dataflow container it doesnt throw any error but still this task doesnt serve my purpose of saving/ commiting update chanages in the database.
I am executing a stored procedure something like this
Create Procedure TEST @test1 @test2 AS BeGIN TRANSACTION ONE SELECT... UPDATE.. .... ....
.... TRUNCATE etc and lot of Select,update and delete statements like this ..... COMMIT TRANSACTION ONE
The Block of code which I have b/w BEGIN TRANSACTION AND COMMIT TRANSACTION ..Will it be rolled back if it encounters any errors in the SELECT,UPPDATE,DELETE ..statements which I have with the transaction one. IF not How do I roll back if it encounters any erros b/w the BEGIN TRANSACTION and END TRANSACTION.
I had thought that if any statement failed within a BEING TRANS .. COMMIT TRANS block, then all the statements would be rolled back. But I am seeing different behavior (SQL Server 2000 8.00.2039)
For instance, run these statements to set up a test: --DROP TABLE testTable1 --DROP TABLE testTable2 CREATE TABLE testTable1 (f1 varchar(1)) CREATE TABLE testTable2 (f1 varchar(1)) CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_tmptmp ON testTable1 (f1) insert into testTable1(f1) values ('a')
So table testTable1 has a unique index on it..
Now try to run these statements:
--DELETE FROM testTable2 BEGIN TRANSACTION insert into testTable1(f1) values ('a') insert into testTable2(f1) values ('a') COMMIT TRANSACTION
SELECT * FROM testTable2
..the first insert fails on the unique index.. but the second insert succeeds. Shouldn't the second insert roll back? How can I make two operations atomic?
Hi All,Can any one help by giving me the details/difference in using the Transaction Isolation Levels (read uncommitted, read committed, repeatable read, or serializable)in asp.net. I just want to know in which case we can use these things in begining a transaction, and will it improve the performance. thanks in advance Boo
I need to copy two large tables from one database into another, via the internet. I haven't worked out exactly how yet, but the first issue which has occurred to me is that by the time the first table has been exported (via a SELECT clause?) into a suitable file, the second table (to which it is related) will be out of sync. So, how do I ensure that I end up with a snapshot of the two tables, perfectly in sync with each other? I know that BEGIN/END TRANSACTION makes sure that UPDATES to tables remain in sync, but will it work just for SELECT statements?
Greetings,I've been reading with interest the threads here on deadlocking, as I'mfinding my formerly happy app in a production environment suddenlydeadlocking left and right. It started around the time I decided towrap a series of UPDATE commands with BEGIN/END.The gist of it is I have a .NET app that can do some heavy reading (nowriting) from tblWOS. It can take a minute or so to read all the datainto the app, along with data from other tables.I also have a web app out on the floor where people can entertransactions which updates perhaps 5-20 records in tblWOS at a time.The issue comes when someone is loading data with the app, and someoneelse tries an update through the web app: deadlocks-ville on theapplication and/or the web app.Again, I believe it began around the time I wrapped those 5-20 recordupdates to tblWOS on the web app with BEGIN/END. The funny thing isthat the records involved are not the same ones, so I'm thinking somekind of table-level lock is going on.I've played with UPDLOCK in examples, but don't quite understand whatit's attempting to do. Since the web update is discrete and short, andit is NOT updating records that are getting loaded, I'd like theBEGIN/UPDATE/END web transaction to happen and not deadlock the loadingapplication.Any suggestions? I'd be most grateful.thanks, Leaf
-- DICHIARAZIONE VARIABILI... DECLARE @dett_idturno as INT DECLARE @totale_giorni as INT DECLARE @tipo_albo_A as VARCHAR(9) DECLARE @tipo_albo_B as VARCHAR(9) DECLARE @data_odierna as DATETIME DECLARE @tot_avvocati as INT DECLARE @avv_giorno as INT DECLARE @avv_giornoA as INT DECLARE @avv_giornoB as INT DECLARE @conta_giorni as INT DECLARE @incremento_giorni as INT DECLARE @incr_dif_giorno as INT DECLARE @nuovo_idturno as INT DECLARE @idalboturno as INT DECLARE @old_turni as INT DECLARE @tot_giorniA as INT DECLARE @tot_giorniB as INT DECLARE @conta_giorni_incremento as INT DECLARE @conta_avvocati as INT DECLARE @avv as INT DECLARE @altri_turni AS INT DECLARE @neg_giorni_incremento as int -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- SET VARIABILI PER EVITARE PROBLEMI CON NULL o 0 SET @totale_giorni = 0 SET @tot_avvocati = 0 SET @avv_giorno = 0 SET @conta_giorni = 0 SET @incremento_giorni = 0 SET @incr_dif_giorno = 0 SET @idalboturno = 0 SET @old_turni = 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SET @nuovo_idturno = @idturno
BEGIN TRAN
-- conta i giorni SELECT @totale_giorni = (DATEDIFF(dd, @data_inizio, @data_fine))+1
-- select da vista avvocati per tipo difensori selezionato.. (controllare anche data_fine_iscrizione?)
create table #Tmp ( [ID_anagrafica] varchar(50) )
IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFO' BEGIN SET @tipo_albo_A = 'DIFM' SET @tipo_albo_B = 'CPT'
-- select per contare..
SELECT @tot_avvocati = COUNT(*) FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_ORDINARI
SELECT @tot_avvocati As tot_avvocati
-- creo tabella temporanea.. INSERT INTO #Tmp SELECT [ID_anagrafica] FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_ORDINARI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA
END
IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFM' BEGIN SET @tipo_albo_A = 'DIFO' SET @tipo_albo_B = 'CPT'
-- select per contare.. SELECT @tot_avvocati = COUNT(*) FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_MINORI
SELECT @tot_avvocati as tot_avvocati
-- creo tabella temporanea.. INSERT INTO #Tmp SELECT [ID_anagrafica] FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_MINORI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA END
IF @tipo_albo = 'CPT' BEGIN SET @tipo_albo_A = 'DIFM' SET @tipo_albo_B = 'DIFO'
-- select per contare.. SELECT @tot_avvocati = COUNT(*) FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_CPT
SELECT @tot_avvocati as tot_avvocati
INSERT INTO #Tmp SELECT [ID_anagrafica] FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_CPT ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA END
DECLARE @idanagrafica varchar(50)
-- GIORNI PER AVVOCATO -- tot_giorni * n_dif_minimo / tot_avvocati = tot_giorni_avvocato (con intero successivo) SET @incremento_giorni = ((@totale_giorni * @n_dif)/@tot_avvocati) -- controllo se c'è resto.. IF ((@totale_giorni * @n_dif)%@tot_avvocati) <> 0 BEGIN SET @incremento_giorni = @incremento_giorni + 1 END
-- ogni avvocato deve essere difensore per almeno 2 giorni di seguito.. -- quindi se l'incremento è minore di 2 deve essere uguale a 2 IF @incremento_giorni < '2' BEGIN SET @incremento_giorni = '2' END
-- AVVOCATI AL GIORNO -- numero variabile.. prendere in considerazione il primo intero e l'intero successivo.. SET @avv_giorno = (@incremento_giorni * @tot_avvocati)/@totale_giorni SET @avv_giornoB = @avv_giorno
-- controllo il resto della divisione.. se <> 0 @avv_giornoB = @avv_giorno + 1.. -- altrimenti i due valori sono uguali..
IF ((@incremento_giorni * @tot_avvocati)%@totale_giorni) <> 0 BEGIN SET @avv_giornoA = @avv_giorno + 1 END ELSE BEGIN set @avv_giornoA = @avv_giorno END
-- conteggi giorni totali difensori... -- giorni con N difensori SET @tot_giorniB = ((@avv_giornoB * @incremento_giorni)/@totale_giorni) -- giorni con M difensori SET @tot_giorniA = @totale_giorni - @tot_giorniB
declare @totale as int declare @conta_inseriti as int set @conta_inseriti = 0 set @totale = (@avv_giornoA * @tot_giorniA) + (@avv_giornoB * @tot_giorniB)
-- ciclo per totale dei giorni SET @conta_giorni = 1 SET @conta_giorni_incremento = 0 SET @conta_avvocati = 0 WHILE @conta_giorni <= @totale_giorni BEGIN
-- ogni giorno @avv deve essere ZERO SET @avv = 0
IF @conta_giorni <= @tot_giorniA BEGIN SET @avv_giorno = @avv_giornoA END ELSE BEGIN SET @avv_giorno = @avv_giornoB END
-- ciclo per ogni giorno per totale di avvocati/giorno SET @incr_dif_giorno = 0
WHILE (@incr_dif_giorno < @avv_giorno) AND EXISTS(SELECT TOP 1 ID_anagrafica FROM #Tmp) BEGIN
SET @conta_avvocati = @conta_avvocati + 1
SET @data_odierna = DATEADD(dd, (@conta_giorni-1), @data_inizio)
SET @neg_giorni_incremento = -1 * @conta_giorni_incremento
SET @old_turni = 0 SET @altri_turni = 0
SELECT TOP 1 @idanagrafica = ID_anagrafica from #Tmp DELETE #Tmp WHERE ID_anagrafica = @idanagrafica
-- query che controlla i turni già assegnati per altre liste...
SELECT @old_turni = COUNT(*) FROM Albo_Turno_Dettaglio CROSS JOIN ALBO_TURNO WHERE Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.idalbo = @idanagrafica AND ( ALBO_TURNO.Tipo = @tipo_albo_A --- probabile problema con trigger OR ALBO_TURNO.Tipo = @tipo_albo_B ) AND ( Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.Data BETWEEN DATEADD(dd, (@neg_giorni_incremento + 1), @data_odierna) AND DATEADD(dd, (@incremento_giorni-@conta_giorni_incremento), @data_odierna) )
SELECT @old_turni AS old_turni
-- (nel caso in cui il ciclo ricominci..) controllare che questo avvocato non abbia -- già un set di giorni in questo turno...
-- passato il primo controllo.. deve passare anche questo..
SELECT @altri_turni = COUNT(*) FROM Albo_Turno_Dettaglio WHERE Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.idalbo = @idanagrafica AND Albo_Turno_Dettaglio.idturno = @nuovo_idturno
SELECT @altri_turni AS altri_turni
IF @old_turni = NULL BEGIN SET @old_turni = 0 END
IF @ALTRI_TURNI = NULL BEGIN SET @ALTRI_TURNI = 0 END
IF (@old_turni = 0 AND (@altri_turni = 0 OR @altri_turni < (@incremento_giorni))) BEGIN -- se non ci sono turni sovraposti assegna il turno all'avvocato x N giorni (incremento_giorni) -- seleziono il dettaglio con idturno max per aumentare di uno... SET @idalboturno = 1 SET @dett_idturno = 1 SELECT @dett_idturno = MAX(idalboturno) FROM Albo_Turno_Dettaglio
if (@dett_idturno) = null begin set @dett_idturno = 0 end
SET @idalboturno = @dett_idturno + 1
BEGIN TRAN
INSERT Albo_Turno_Dettaglio ( idalboturno, idalbo, idturno, data ) VALUES ( @idalboturno, @idanagrafica, -- da cursore @nuovo_idturno, @data_odierna -- problemi inserimento data?? )
COMMIT -- valorizza il numero degli avvocati del giorno + 1 SET @incr_dif_giorno = @incr_dif_giorno + 1 END ELSE BEGIN -- non incrementare la variabile... SET @incr_dif_giorno = @incr_dif_giorno END
END -- END WHILE AVVOCATI PER GIORNI
SET @conta_giorni_incremento = (@conta_giorni_incremento + 1) IF @conta_giorni_incremento < @incremento_giorni BEGIN --DEVO RIPOPOLARE LA TABELLA PERCHE' OGNI AVVOCATO DEVE AVERE X GIORNI.. -- cancello tutti i record e poi inserisco di nuovo.. DELETE FROM #Tmp IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFO' BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Tmp SELECT [ID_anagrafica] FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_ORDINARI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA END
IF @tipo_albo = 'DIFM' BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Tmp SELECT [ID_anagrafica] FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_MINORI ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA END
IF @tipo_albo = 'CPT' BEGIN
INSERT INTO #Tmp SELECT [ID_anagrafica] FROM VALBO_ISCRIZIONE_DIF_CPT ORDER BY ID_ANAGRAFICA END
END ELSE BEGIN set @conta_giorni_incremento = 0 END
SET @conta_giorni = @conta_giorni + 1 END
DROP TABLE #TMP
COMMIT TRAN
GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF GO SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO
we have an update sp that must call an insert sp after the update. The update and insert must act like a transaction, ie all or none.
We believe that wrapping most of the update (including call to insert sp) sp in a begin tran block would guarantee the all or none behavior.
However, we're not sure what would happen if one of our developers calls the update sp from within a transaction scope that expects yet something additional to be included in the transaction. Would the begin tran block (assuming no errors in that block) in the sp commit both the update and insert regardless of what happens in the rest of the .net tran scope?
I am trying to use sql transaction in foreach loop where I am passing 1 ID @ a time .I want to rollback only current ID.1st task in foreach is execute sql task with begin tran and next is data flow task with 2 source and destination for 2 different tables (if anyone fails then rollback from all tables). After data flow is another execute sql task with rollback tran on failure (logical condition on pipe is OR). The rollback works but only rollback 1 table although I want to rollback on current iteration ID of foreach from both tables.
Hello everyone,This is more of an architectural question about SQL Server. Cansomeone please explain why when I perform a query such as the onebelow that updates a table using begin and end transaction I am unableto programmatically truncate the transaction log. The only way I havefound to truncate the transaction log is to stop and start the SQLServer Service. Does this transaction use the tempdb? Is that why Iam unable to truncate the transaction log? Is there a better way todo this?Begin trans T1Update sometableSet random_row = 'blah'End trans T1Thanks!
I am getting an exception. And i don't know whether this exception is from the C# coding or SQL SERVER."Cannot roll back InsertRxs. No transaction or savepoint of that name was found.Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements. Previous count = 0, current count = 1.A transaction that was started in a MARS batch is still active at the end of the batch. The transaction is rolled back."
I'm all of a sudden getting this error on a Stored Procedure that has not been touched since it was created.
Msg 266, Level 16, State 2, Procedure usp_ArchivexactControlPoint, Line 0 Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates a mismatching number of BEGIN and COMMIT statements. Previous count = 0, current count = 1.
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_ArchivexactControlPoint] AS DECLARE @TableName VARCHAR (50)
I'm getting this when executing the code below. Going from W2K/SQL2k SP4 to XP/SQL2k SP4 over a dial-up link.
If I take away the begin tran and commit it works, but of course, if one statement fails I want a rollback. I'm executing this from a Delphi app, but I get the same from Qry Analyser.
I've tried both with and without the Set XACT . . ., and also tried with Set Implicit_Transactions off.
set XACT_ABORT ON Begin distributed Tran update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.TRANSACTIONMAIN set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update TSADMIN.TRANSACTIONMAIN set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 and DONE = 1 update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.WBENTRY set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update TSADMIN.WBENTRY set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.FIXED set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update TSADMIN.FIXED set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.ALTCHARGE set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update TSADMIN.ALTCHARGE set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.TSAUDIT set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 update TSADMIN.TSAUDIT set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 COMMIT TRAN
It's got me stumped, so any ideas gratefully received.Thx
I have a design a SSIS Package for ETL Process. In my package i have to read the data from the tables and then insert into the another table of same structure.
for reading the data i have write the Dynamic TSQL based on some condition and based on that it is using 25 different function to populate the data into different 25 column. Tsql returning correct data and is working fine in Enterprise manager. But in my SSIS package it show me time out ERROR.
I have increase and decrease the time to catch the error but it is still there i have tried to set 0 for commandout Properties.
if i'm using the 0 for commandtime out then i'm getting the Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.
and
Failed to open a fastload rowset for "[dbo].[P@@#$%$%%%]". Check that the object exists in the database.
I am getting this error :Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException: Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.have anybody idea?!
i have a sequence container in my my sequence container i have a script task for drop the existing tables. This seq. container connected to another seq. container. all these are in for each loop container when i run the package it's work fine for 1st looop but it gives me error for second execution.
Message is like this:
Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.
i am getting this error "Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.".
my transations have been done using LINKED SERVER. when i manually call the store procedure from Server 1 it works but when i call it through Service broker it dosen't work and gives me this error.
I am getting following Error: Oracle linked server in SQL server 2005 to update tables in Oracle database. I have used OPENQuery to update tables in Oracle from a SQL Server 2005 Stored procedure.
If we run query from sql management studio for inserting or updating table of linked server then it runs fine. But if we use Begin distributed transaction then its gives error -
Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_test, Line 105 The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction. [OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ] OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]. We are using Sql server stored procedure to run the open query syntax for updating oracle interface table.