Backwards Technology(SQL 2005 - SQL 2000)
Feb 29, 2008
Hi ALL
In my script below. I'm trying to update a SQL Server 2000 DB with data from SQL Server 2005. I've written a Cursor to call tables from information schema. Compare the data between 2005 and 2000 then Insert into SQL 2000 Table. But I'm getting The multi-part identifier "c.ID" could not be bound.. Can you please help me to resolve this.
DECLARE @TableName VARCHAR(255)
DECLARE @Sql VARCHAR(1000)
DECLARE TableCursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT Table_Name FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE Table_Type = 'Base Table' and Table_Name like 'L_%'
OPEN TableCursor
FETCH NEXT FROM TableCursor INTO @TableName
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
DECLARE @Line VARCHAR(1000)
SET @Line = ''
SELECT @Line = @Line + 'c.'+ c.Column_Name + ' , '
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES T
JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS C
ON t.Table_Name = c.Table_Name
WHERE t.Table_Name = @TableName and t.Table_Name like 'L_%'
SELECT @Sql = SUBSTRING(@Line, 1, LEN(@Line) -1)
SELECT @Sql = 'SELECT'+ ' ' + @Sql
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + 'INTO dbo.L_BrokerTest'
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + ' '+ 'FROM'+ ' '
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + @TableName + ' ' +'A' + ' '
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + 'LEFT JOIN'
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + '[Blake-DBN12].Staging.dbo.'
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + @TableName + ' ' +'B'+ ' '
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + 'ON' + ' '
SELECT @Sql = @Sql + 'A.ID <> B.ID'
--PRINT @Sql
EXEC (@Sql)
FETCH NEXT FROM TableCursor INTO @TableName
END
CLOSE TableCursor
DEALLOCATE TableCursor
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 7, 2007
If my client has a SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition license, can they use that license for a SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition installation?
thanks for any help...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 15, 2008
I am new to accessing sql stuff and asp.net I have some code in a .cs page that accesses a sql database and displays the information on a page from top to bottom (press releases: www.managewatch.com/press). I created this site but I used the code from the old site and just implemented it. I'd like to have the press releases display from newest on top to oldest on bottom. Is there a way I can do this? I have included the code in my cs page that does this: protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { // connect to db SqlConnection db = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["xxxx"].ConnectionString); db.Open(); // Initialize Objects SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(); cmd.Connection = db; SqlDataReader row; // COUNT PAGES ######################################## cmd.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM press"; row = cmd.ExecuteReader(); while (row.Read()) { Literal pressReleaseTitle = new Literal(); Literal pressReleaseBody = new Literal(); pressReleaseTitle.Text = "<div id='pressheader'>" + row["title"].ToString() + "</div>"; pressReleaseBody.Text = "<div id='pressbody'>" + row["content"].ToString() + "</div><br>"; lblPressReleases.Controls.Add(pressReleaseTitle); lblPressReleases.Controls.Add(pressReleaseBody); } row.Close(); db.Close(); } I can see what is happening here "cmd.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM press";" tells it to get all the info from "press" but I just don't get the " row = cmd.ExecuteReader();" part. Is this just grabbing one line of the database? what does this code do? Thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2006
I'm sure this question has already been asked, I made an attempt to search the forums, but was unsuccessful.
Our production servers are currently running SQL Server 2000 3a. I just got a new development system and have no intentions of installing SQL Server 2000 dev, but SQL Server 2005 Dev Edition.
I was wondering if I will still be able to install SQL2005 and still be able to administer/modify 2000 mdfs with SQL 2005 Enterprise Manager. I wanted to be able to still make development on SQL 2k5 and update the production server (SQL2k). This is on my dev system not the production, the production will still be running SQL 2k, until the client decides on purchasing SQL 2k5.
Of course I will not be able to use the new db features and types on a SQL2000 server, I just want to maintain the legacy with 05 Enterprise Manager (i.e.: SP, UDF and DTO).
Thanks a gig.
Larry
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2005
Hi,
I am trying to install Microsoft SQL Server September 2005 Community Technology Preview.
I get the generic error saying "SQL Server 2005 setup has detected incompatibe components...."
So I checked the C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGSQLSetup0020_Core.log file
which says
C:SQLENT2005Serverssetup.exe Version: 2005.90.1314.0
Running: LoadResourcesAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:29
Complete: LoadResourcesAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:29, returned true
Running: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:29
Loaded DLL:C:SQLENT2005Serversxmlrw.dll Version:2.0.3604.0
Complete: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:30, returned true
Running: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:30
Complete: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:30, returned true
Running: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:30
Complete: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:30, returned true
Running: PerformSCCAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:30
Complete: PerformSCCAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:31, returned true
Running: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:31
Complete: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:31, returned true
Running: DetectPatchedBootstrapAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:31
Complete: DetectPatchedBootstrapAction at: 2005/9/11 13:3:31, returned true
Action "LaunchPatchedBootstrapAction" will be skipped due to the following restrictions:
Condition "EventCondition: __STP_LaunchPatchedBootstrap__1952" returned false.
Running: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2005/9/11 13:3:31
Loaded DLL:C:WINNTsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.2435
Product "{53F5C3EE-05ED-4830-994B-50B2F0D50FCE}" versioned 9.00.1187.07 is not compatible with current builds of SQL Server.Expected at least version: 9.00.1314
The Product Name is "Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English)"
Loaded DLL:C:WINNTsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.2435
Error: Action "PerformSCCAction2" threw an exception during execution.
Return Code: 70032
Message displayed to user
SQL Server 2005 Setup has detected incompatible components from beta versions of Visual Studio, .NET Framework, or SQL Server 2005. Use Add or Remove Programs to remove these components, and then run SQL Server 2005 Setup again. For detailed instructions on uninstalling SQL Server 2005, see the SQL Server 2005 Readme.
I understand that I need to uninstall "Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English)"
But when I try to do that I get
"A network error occured while attempting to read from C:WinntInstallerSQLSupport.msi"
how do i fix this...
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2008
I have a user who is trying to load SQL server 2005 Express on a new Acer laptop computer. The computer has the following:
Windows Vista Home Premium 32 bits
AMD Turion 64 mobile technology CPU
1790 MB of RAM
When the user tries to load SQL server 2005 Express it does not load. The user after the load is getting an €œUnhandled exception has occurred in your application€? when he tries to run the application.
Does anyone know how to fix this problem?
Thank you,
Photomultiplier
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2007
I need to simulate cursor-type (groan) behavior in a dataset and am wondering if this is possible in the foreach task. Example - The user has the need to go through the data row-by-row, and if a certain value is missing in row 10 then go back to row 8, grab a value from that row, and plug it in the missing column in row 10. Then move on to row 11.
Is there a way to make the foreach ADO enumerator travel backwards? Is there a way to do this that will not be awfully inefficient? Any suggestions out there would be welcome.
I've advocated for set-based updates, and these simply aren't an option, as each successive row depends on the updates that may have happened above it in the sequence. Unless I hear of any other ideas out there I have to move forward with this sequential type operation.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
If u know sql server. whats the next best technology to learn?
mysql, oracle or any frontend language?
Thanks Plesae only experts.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2015
what are the SS rules around forwards compatibility? For example, I have a SS2014 DB instance but I'm able to query it through SSMS2012 Express. Also, I backed up a SS2012 database and restored it into a SS2014 instance which works as expected. Should I also be able to back up a SS2014 instance that was restored from SS2012 and restore it into a separate SS2012 instance?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2005
in the world of .Net and J2EE , what is the Technology used to access the database ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2006
Hello, I have an existing suite of applications in my company where remote laptop users enter data into a local database instance. There are several different applications with several different databases (some users run application A and C, others run A and B and D, etc). All of this data needs to make its way into both their local databases, and to the front office database. In addition, some of the data goes out of the front office to other end users (supervisors get data from people under them).
Currently, we get the data back and forth by creating text files full of SQL statements that are run on either the end user servers or the main server, and we zip and ftp these SQL Script files back and forth.
I am looking into the benefits of replacing this process with a Service Broker application, but I'm still too much of a newbie to understand how this might work. What should my messages contain? Should they contain the same SQL statements that are currently in the script files, and then a SSB process would grab the SQL and run it? Or should the message types be more specific to each application?
any pointers to articles that go beyond "here's what SSB is" would be appreciated.
matt tagliaferri
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2007
I'm contemplating a sql server archive strategy that rolls really old data off any sort of dbms and onto low cost media like dvds in a non relational archive format. I dont want to ever worry about these archives spanning different versions of sql when i go to retrieve a range of data that happens to span sql versions (eg one disc was sourced from 2005 another by 2008 but my report needs a union of both).
So I'm thinking about neutral/efficient formats for these archives and a live homegrown catalog that can determine exactly what disc(s) need to be mounted based on passed from and to date parameters...all so that the data that might span discs (and versions and maybe even schemas) can be merged and loaded into my sql version d'jour's "throw away" archive database for a one time report or other unplanned activity.
I remember raw data types being very convenient as an ETL format for our customers who have ssis, but wouldn't want our sqlexpress customers to be left without the archiving capability. Do the "things" that read and write raw data files really originate in some special T-SQL command that all sql editions can use, or is it strictly an ssis thing?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2006
Hi
We would like to install Sql 2005 Enterprise Edition (including database engine, reporting service, integration service and analysis service) as a sepearte instance on a server which already has Sql 2000 with reporting services and analysis services. We do not want to disturb the existing sql 2000 setup.
If we do that then what will happen to my earlier sql 2000 reporting service? Will it be upgraded to sql 2005 reporting service? I heard that reporting services are instance unaware application. Where will be the default reporting service database available?
Please help us.
Regards,
Sankar N
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2007
I am attempting to move some SQL 2000 databases to SQL 2005. My main production database does not seem to want to move. When I use the SQL 2005 GUI the .bak backup file is marked 'Incomplete'. When I attempt to restore the backup file I get a 'RESTORE detected an error on page (0:0) in database' message. I saw a thread in the SQL Express forum suggesting trying to restore from the T-SQL level to get the GUI out of the picture and I get the same 'error on page (0:0)' message. However when I take the same file and use SQL 2000 Enterprise Manager it restores with no problems.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Mike Mattix
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2008
Hi, I am trying to edit some data from a SQL2000-datasource in ASP.NET 2.0 and have a problem with a column that has bit-data and is used for selection. SQL2005 works fine when declaring <SelectParameters> <asp:Parameter DefaultValue="TRUE" Name="APL" Type="boolean" /> </SelectParameters>When running this code with SQL2000, there are no error-msgs, but after editing a record the "APL"-column looses its value of 1 and is set to 0. Looks like an issue with type-conversion, we've hit incompatibilities between SQL200 and 2005 with bit/boolean several times before. So, how is this done correctly with SQL2000? (I've tried setting the Type to "int16" -> err. Also setting Defval="1" gave an err) ThanksMichael
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2006
Hi,i have SQL 2000 and 2005 on same machine(with different intance names,of course), my laptop - XP with SP2. The 2005 works fine but i can'tconnect on SQL 2000. All the the SQL services are started.Any idea? Have i to reinstall 2000?Tks,Lourival
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2008
I have to merge the data from two databases, one is in SQL Server 2005 format, one is in 2000. The merged data will then reside on a SQL Server 2000 platform. Is there an easy way to do this through Management Studio or Enterprise Manager? Or will we have to export the data from the 2005 database to a flat file and import it into a new 2000 database. And then do the merge?
TIA
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2007
I am in the process of migrating from Sql Server 2000 to 2005. Part of my plan is to move some database's to 2005, but use the 2000 compatibility mode for the short term. My issue is this, our DR boxes are still on SQL Server 2000, would I still be able to use our log shipping processes? Or would I be better off in starting with migrating the DR boxes to 2005 first?
Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2006
I have several SQL 2000 servers I need to setup transactional (non updatable) replication with. The structure is:
SQL Server 2000 as Publisher/Distributor
SQL Server 2005 Standard as Subscriber
The connection is via the Internet with snapshots using FTP.
I setup the first set (2 databases at location A). They work wonderfully. I created the publication and then subscribed using MGMT Studio for 2K5.
II am setting up the same scenario for location B. Here is my problem:
In MGMT Studio I connect to the publisher (SANDRA). I right-click a publication and choose New Subscriptions..., the publication is already selected. I click next - Run each agent at its Subscriber is selected and the only option (this is desired), I click Next
HERE IS THE PROBLEM:
On the Subscriber's screen there are no Subscribers listed. When setting up location A the subscribing server was listed and I could choose a database. The Next button is greyed out and there is no way to create/add one.
I tried setting up the subscription by right-clicking the subcribing server's Replication folder in MGMT Studio but I get the same result (except that I have to authenticate with the publishing server which works fine).
WHAT'S DIFFERENT:
Location A is SQL Server Standard (SP3) running on SBS2K3. It is obviously on a domain and so SQL Server and the SQL Agent are running under domain accounts. Location B is a Windows XP SP2 machine running SQL Server Personal Edition (it actually says Development Edition in the properties window).
The databases are the same strucutre, different data. At location A the firewall is set to allow 1433->*any* and *any*->1433 where *any* is 1024 or higher. On the XP machine the firewall is set to allow port 1433. I don't think this is the issue because I've turned the firewall off on the XP machine and I get the same result.
ANY IDEAS?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2007
Most of our sql servers ar still sql 2000. Our programmers created many sql 2000 database diagrams using EM. But they can not access them under sql 2005. (They now have only sql 2005 tools installed on their boxes.)
Question: can we reinstall the sql 2000 client tools on their boxes without affecting the current sql 2005 install on their boxes?
Question: is there any workaround negating the need to ihstall the sql 2000 client?
TIA,
barkingdog
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Hello Everyone,
I'm trying to connect to Desktop SQL Server 2000 from Windows mobile PC Emulator (VS 2005). I need a direct connection using connection string to SQL Server 2000 through local wireless network without IIS.
Bellow is the code that I use. After executing this code I get an error on line Conn.Open(). Error says SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
SQL is un and running, and I can log in using SA username from the desktop. Even if I chance IP for another SQL server in my connection string I still get the same error. There is no firewall of any kind running.
Dim connectionSTR As String = "Persist Security Info=False;Integrated Security=False;Server=192.168.0.202,1433;initial catalog=MyDB;user id=sa;password=;"
Dim Conn As SqlConnection
Conn = New SqlConnection(connectionSTR)
Conn.Open()
If Conn.State = ConnectionState.Open Then
MessageBox.Show("Open")
End If
About my environment: SQL Server 2000 is running on Desktop PC with Windows XP SP2. Application which I need to connect to SQL Server is in Visual Studio 2005. I execute the application in Windows Mobile PC Emulator and try to connect to SQL Server from emulator.
Your advice and help is very appreciated
Thank you
Ika
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
Hello,
I would like to ask you if there is better to recreate database structure on 2005 from 2000 and move data or to just load
2000 backup.
Currently I loaded the backup, but I am wondering if there might be slightly better performance on 2005 when recreating structure on 2005 to loading 2000 backup?
Does loading 2000 backup create 2005 binary structure?
Thanks for help in advance
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2006
How do SQL 2000 service packs play a role in upgrading? That is, can SQL 2000 Standard with no Service Packs(SP) be upgraded to SQL 2005 Standard, or does SQL 2000 Standard have to have a certain service pack??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2005
P4 2.8G Hz, 512 M RAM.thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2006
If we changed the sort order from BIN to BIN2 but kept everything else the same will it have any effect on replication? So in SQL 2005 if I were to change my default collation from Latin1_General_Bin to Latin1_General_Bin2, would that cause replication to break? I suspect that it will not be an issue since it is just sort order that is changing and the code page stays the same.
BTW, this is transactional replication. Sorry, I left that out of my original post.
Thanks,
Grant
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2006
Hi all.My webhost prepared a server for me with sql 2000 instead of sql 2005.Will my asp.net 2005 application work there?I generated a script to export my sql server 2005 objectsLots of failures appeard.IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.database_principals WHERE name =N'aspnet_WebEvent_FullAccess' AND type = 'R')CREATE ROLE [aspnet_WebEvent_FullAccess]GOThis is the error:Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 2Line 2: Incorrect syntax near 'ROLE'.The object is part of the asp.net security/login components - I did not create these objects myself!Please tell me what to do next..........TIAGuy
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2007
Hi, What would I lose out(functionality wise) if I were to use MS SQL 2000 instead of 2005? What are the main differences, and considerations to be factored in before choose which database to work on?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2008
Hi
I'm doing my fierst steps in .net and sql
I have made a website base on sql data in sql2005
'and find out that my hosting company (I'm host on shear server ) is only supporting sql2000 how can I convert it to 2000 ?
Or is there anther trick?
Thanks
assaf
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2008
i have developed my project in asp.net 2.0 +ajax +c# as backend with sql server 2000 as back end
now my question is can i change my sql server to 2005
will it gives any problem in furture
all my queries will run properly
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2008
HI,
I Have my websites developed in sql 2005 and my host is providing SQL 2000.
WHAT problem i might face will my site run ?
or do i need to change things??
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2005
I want to use SQL 2000 with VS 2005. I do have SQL 2005 Express installed but i would rather use SQL 2000 because all my DBs are currently in this version and I want to get up and developing now and then convert them to SQL 2005 one at a time. LATER...When I try to connect to SQL 2000 through VS 2005 I keep getting this error that tells me it can not connect to SQL 2005 Express. This is my conncetion string:
Const connectionString As String = "Server=localhost;Trusted_Connection=True;Database=Northwind"One thing that I see wrong with the error is that I thought SQL 2005 did not have Northwind anymore. And 2 this is a sample app from MS website. So why would it try to connect to SQL 2005 Express. This is my first try at connecting to a DB with VS 2005.Please Help.-J
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2006
Hi, I am currently developing my website to ASP.NET 2.0 using SQL Server 2005 Express Edition.
However, after long hour to figure out, my hosting company doesn't use
sql 2005. They only have SQL Server 2000. Even I have to pay for using
SQL 2000.
My question is, what is the different between SQL 2000 and 2005 in term of using it in a server?
My condition is that I am developing my database under SQL Server 2005
EE, now, can it be uploaded to be used in a server with SQL 2000?
Thanks in advanced for all help, time and your support. HAVE a good day!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2005
can anyone point me to where microsoft are displaying the product expiry of SQL 2000, ie how soon do we need to be looking at adopting the new version?
View 2 Replies
View Related