Browser Compatibility In SSRS 2005
Nov 30, 2005How can I get my report to render correctly in Firefox?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Reporting Services :: Interface Code Compatibility Between Custom Delivery Extension Of SSRS 2008R2 And SSRS 2012?
Sep 3, 2015Currently we are using Custom Delivery Extension for SSRS 2008R2 We are planning to move it SSRS2012
My Question is: Whether we can use the same Code used for SSRS2008R2 to SSRS2012?
if not what code changes we should do?
SSRS Report In Firefox Browser Is A Mess --- Please Help
Mar 2, 2007hi
i have a SSRS report where matrix is embedded into table.
when i view the deployed report in IE, it works fine
But when i view the report in FIREFOX browser.. the report for toss..
the alignment of the report is completely screwed up :-(
My client badly requires Firefox support for all their reports
Any suggestion and help would be appreciated
Thanks
Browser Similar To SSAS Required For SSRS
Jun 29, 2007Hi,
How to import analysis browser in SSRS. I need features similar to SSAS Cube browser and SSAS dimention browser.
Regards
Spandan
Cannot Open SSRS Report Manager URL On Windows Edge Browser
Sep 21, 2015I was using Windows 7 and had SSRS 2014 installed.Having set up the inbound rule on Windows Firewall (port 80), to allow SSRS through, I was able to browse to the Report Manager URL, by opening up Internet Explorer as 'Administrator'..
However, now that I have upgraded to Windows 10, I am unable to open the URL.In fact there is now way for me to open Edge as administrator and open my Report Manager URL.
Reporting Services :: Graph Misalignment In Browser - SSRS Report
Jun 22, 2015I am facing an issue when report with graph deployed to BI, I can see the misalignment issue in the browser however, when report is run in the Report Builder/SQL Server Data tool or export into PDF then there is no issue.
How to fix the misalignment issue of the graph in the browser. See the both graph below -
Graph Misalignment Issues Screengrab in Browser
Graph without misalignment issue in PDF or Report development tool
I am using the Internet Explorer browser.
Reporting Services :: SSRS Chart Series Conditional Color Formatting Not Rendering In Browser
Aug 6, 2015I have a chart with series that needs conditional colour for three conditions. One condition must be transparent. I have tried the various IFF or SWITCH expressions below and some work fine in SSDT but when I deploy them to the browser the formatting is lost. This simple IFF expression works. The series is transparent as required both in SSDT (Visual Studio BIDS) and IE11 and Firefox browsers but I need two other conditions.Â
=IIF(Fields!ExhibitionID.Value = -1, "#00ffffff", "Red")
Both of the expressions below work in SSDT (Visual Studio BIDS) as expected but when deployed to the browser none of this formatting is rendered and all series are in blues even the ‘transparent’ series. No red at all.
=IIF(Fields!ExhibitionID.Value = -1,"#00ffffff", IIF(Fields!ExhDepartment.Value = 27,"Orange","Red"))
=Switch(Fields!ExhibitionID.Value
= -1,"#00ffffff",Fields!ExhDepartment.Value = 27,"Orange",(Fields!ExhDepartment.Value <> 27) AND (Fields!ExhibitionID.Value <> -1),"Red")
I have tried deleting various files RDL and DATA. I have tried uploading the file from report manager in IE and I have tried editing the file in report manager.
Any Compatibility Issues Between SQL 2005 Express And SQL 2005 Server
Apr 1, 2006Hi All,
The IP company that host my site is installing SQL 2005 soon and I my building a web application with SQL 2005 Express. So the question is has anyone heard of any problems with uploading an 2005 express onto a sql 2005 server? I would like to find out now before I finish all of the work. Don't want to find out later that you can't run a sql 2005 express database on a sql 2005 server.
Thanks for taking the time to read this.
Database Compatibility Between Sql 2005 Standard V/s Sql 2005 64 Bit
Jul 24, 2006I am a newbie developing a web site. My local machine has sql 2005 standard edition on it. The host that I am trying to use only has sql 2005 64 bit version.
would I be able to do the use the same database between the two ( i.e. once my site is running at host, would I be able to download the database on my local machine, make changes to my site and then upload again on the hose without any glitches?). In addition, how about sql express doing the same with sql 2005 64 bit.
Thanks a lot for taking time to read the post.
SQL 2005 And ADO.NET 1.1 Compatibility
Aug 9, 2006we have applications currently talking to a sql 2000 DB via ado.net 1.1. will we have any problems if we upgrade to sql 2005, will the app have to be modified.
View 3 Replies View RelatedSQL 2005 Compatibility
Jul 27, 2006Hi,
i'm using a query to insert a value in a field named 'From' in a table.
i used like
Insert in to myTable ([from]) values('01/01/2005')
The query was working in sql 2000. but in sql 2005, i'm getting a error like
'Syntax error near 'From'.
what could be the reason for this???
SQL 2005 Reporting Manager On Non-IE Browser
Jan 7, 2007Is it true that the Report Manager is not designed to be run on non-IE browsers like Firefox etc?
I can't even view a proper report if it's launched by Firefox......:eek:
SQL2000 And 2005 Compatibility
Sep 28, 2007
Hi,
I've passed my ASP application database from SQL Server2000 to SQL Server 2005 and have some problems with the
new functions in SQL Server2005, which do not acsept the Date & Time format as SQL 2000..in insert query.
SQL2000 : dd/mm/yyyy
SQL2005: CONVERT(DATETIME,(DATE),103) = 27/12/2006
Is there some some other way of resolving the problem?
SQL Express 2005 SP2 Compatibility
Apr 3, 2007I am attempting to install SQL Express 2005 SP2 on a Windows 2000 Server computer. Can someone tell me if this version of SQL is compatible with this operating system? I am getting a warning that my system does not meet the minimum hardware requirements when attempting the install.
I have 512bm of memory (minimum requirement is 192), a PIII/866mhz processor (minimum requirement is a PIII/600mhz) and plenty od disk space. So is it the operating system that is causing this warning?
I also have the Windows Installer 3.1 as well as the Dot Net Framework 2.0 installed.
Any ideas?
Thanks for your help - Steve
SQL Server 2005 And RDO Compatibility
Jun 12, 2006Are there any known issues with using RDO with SQL Server 2005?
My company is in the process of updating our SQL Server 7 database to
SQL Server 2005. Most of our applications are several years old and
written using RDO to access the database. I have since started the
daunting task of updating all the applications to ADO, but it's only
about a quarter of the way done. We need to update the database ASAP,
but we cannot wait until all the applications have been updated to ADO.
While testing the applications (written in VB6) against the new SQL
Server 2005 database, I have come across a problem with the RDO queries
not returning the correct data. The query returns 4 records. In the
SQL7, it properly shows 4 for RowCount and 4 records are present in the
recordset (as seen by looping through the recordset using rs.MoveNext).
In SQL2005, it properly shows 4 for RowCount, but looping through the
recordset shows that the recordset only contains 1 record. The problem
seems to be linked to a Left Join in the Query. (see below) Table1 has
a column that has a RecID for Table2. In the case where the Table2RecID
column in Table1 is 0, the row is just not added to the recordset even
though it increments the RowCount.
Code:
SELECT * FROM Table1 As T1
LEFT JOIN Table2 As T2 On T1.Table2RecID = T2.RecID
I converted the query to ADO and it ran fine with no problems. The issue has something to do with SQL Server 2005 and RDO.
Finding Out Db Compatibility Levels In 2005
Dec 31, 2007In a new environment where we have 2005 servers and loads of databases that are running in compatibility mode with 2000 (80)
Are there any queries we can run on that can tell me what compatibility level each db is?
Looked on the web for ages apart from here but only info for changing the compatibility level - sp_dbcmptlevel – but queies only seem to be for changing it not and not reporting on it.
But I obviously do not want to do that for a production environment.
I want to do a mini report as to what db’s are still (I think all) 2000 mode and then suggest upgrades – I can go into the properties of each one but I know there must be an easier way – finding a load of admin queries that require cross apply and for that I need 2005 (90) compatibility….or is that only for the master db?
Disadvantages Of Running 80 Compatibility On 2005?
May 1, 2007I have a hosted solution where the web host provider tells me I'm running on a 2005 platform, but when I check the DB options, it shows compatibility level 80. The provider tells me I'm not losing any performance by running in the lower compatibility mode. Is this truly the case? What else am I losing out on in terms of features or capabilities?
View 11 Replies View RelatedSQL 2005 TempDB In 6.5 Compatibility Mode
Feb 1, 2008
On my current contract we have a SQL 2005 box with a user database and the tempdb database in 6.5 compatibility mode. I would like to remove the user database and change the tempdbs compatibility mode. When you try and use EM just about everything fails with errors about collation or syntax. From what I have found it could be related to the tempdb being in 6.5 compatibility mode but either way I would like to remove this old unused DB.
My question is after I remove the user DB and reset the tempdb compatibility mode what will or could break? I haven't been able to find much on what would change or what to look out for after the change is made. Has anyone else done this? If so what issues did you face.
Thanks
Doug
SQL 2005 Replication And Compatibility Levels
Jun 11, 2006Hi There,
We have been using SQL 2005 in our dev enviroment for a few weeks, and I have just completed migrating our production server to a 64bit instance of SQL 2005 standard.
I have 3 publications, 1 snapshot, and 2 transactional. All go to SQL 2000 databases.
Our dev enviroment is in compatibility level 90, and our application is working fine. My concern is, will changing the production compatibility level from 80 to 90 affect / break replication to SQL 2000 Servers?
Thank you.
SQL 2005 Upgrade With Compatibility Level 80
Nov 30, 2007Hi All,
We have upgraded our database from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005 keeping the compatibility level 80.
Now the question is -
Would microsoft support compatibility level 80 in SQL Server 2005 even after the extended support date for SQL Server 2000?
OR
If Microsoft dropped the support for SQL 2000, then would Microsoft support compatibility level 80 in SQL Server 2005?
Thanks
How To Launch SQL Server 2005 ReportViewer In A New Browser Window.
Dec 26, 2006Hi all,
I am trying to launch ReportViewer in a new browser window, using the attribute: target='_blank'.
Can someone tell me how?
Here is the complete URL for the report .
http://SServer1/ReportServer?/Primary Members/Detail Report&rs:Command=Render&rs:Format=HTML4.0&rc:Parameters=false&UserName=sobo1
SQL Server 2005 && 2000 Tool Compatibility
Jan 31, 2006Can someone tell me if I can use the Gui tools which come with SQL Server 2005 against 2000 databases ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWindows Vista Compatibility With SQL Server 2005
Mar 10, 2008Hi to All,
I want to choose between Windows Vista editions. Please help me I should go for Windows Vista Business or Windows Vista Home Premium as I intend to install SQL Server 2005.
Thanks to All
Trace Flags Compatibility In SQL Server 2005
Sep 11, 2007We have the following trace flags present in startup in SQL server 2000:
809
1204
3605
3913
Need to understand if these should be required in SQL Server 2005 + SP2 version. I have run the upgrade advisor tool which indcates that the behaviour of some flags has changed and some other TFs are no longer applicable. Hence, I want to know about the above mentioned TFs.
Regards,
Chetan
Problem With Compatibility Between Access 2003 And SQL 2005
Nov 26, 2007In my office, we offer support for applications developed in Access 2003 in a SQL Server 2000 environment, for some of our clients.
In one PC we have installed MsOffice 2003 and recently installed SQL Server 2005 personal edition, but now we have a problem because there is a compatibility problem between them. We need some upgrade for Access to avoid it, but can't find it.
Can We fix this problem, maintainning Access 2003 and SQL Server 2005 personal edition and maintainning the support for our clients?
Notice that our clients can't upgrade, in the short time.
SQL Express (Not 2005 Standard) SQL Browser Responses Cause A Problem With SQL 2000
Dec 14, 2007The problem can be seen in Enterprise Manager for 2000 (all service packs), Service Manager for MSDE (2000 all service packs), and OSQL (2000 all versions).
The exact problem is as follows:
In a network environment if SQL EXPRESS (problem does not occurr with 2005 Standard) is installed using defaults
SQL 2000 & MSDE machines will no longer see instances. This is a browser issue for 2000 and MSDE. For some reason the response back to the 2000 machine from the EXPRESS machine causes the 2000 machine to stop listening for reponses.
If you have a network with SQL 2000/MSDE machines that have named instances (default instance is not affected) they will lose sight of eachother when a SQL EXPRESS box is put on the network with its SQL browser service running. We have tried service pack 3a and 4 on the 2000 boxes and it does not resolve the issue. It may resolve issues with 2005 and 2000 on the same machine but this problem is with networked machines and doesn't appear to be the same issue. The SQL EXPRESS machine will be able to see all the
named instances from the 2000 boxes and the 2000 machines usually will only see the EXPRESS named instance until the EXPRESS box SQL Browser service is stopped.
No word from Microsoft so far.
DOES ANYONE HAVE A SIMILAR ENVIRONMENT AND RUN INTO A SIMILAR ISSUE?
Features Not Supported In Compatibility Level 80 Of SQL Server 2005
Oct 23, 2007Hello All,
I am in the process of upgrading my current database in SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005. I have finished my analysis using the upgrade advisor and have found a lot of SPs having upgrade related issues. From what I estimate I think it will take around 3-4 weeks to resolve all of those issues. I wanted a quicker way to upgrade my database since we have very little time for the final release. The main reason for upgrade to 2005 was use of new features like Database Mirroring and/or peer to peer replication alongwith the Partitioning features and the new T-SQL enhancements.
The question I wanted to ask was does the compatibility level 80 of SQL Server 2005 supports these new features.
From what I have read on the KB article at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822400 is that mirroring is supported in any compatibility level, but there is no specific mention on the peer to peer thing.
Also when I personally tried using the New Partitioning Features of 2005 on the database having compatibility 80, it worked fine. Also other features like SQLCLR and TRY...CATCH works fine.
One thing I observed was that new T-SQL statements like PIVOT/UNPIVOT is not supported
It will be nice if someone can give out the entire list of features that will be supported in the compatibility Level 80 and also the list of the ones that are not supported.
Thanks in Advance,
Mitesh
Running SQL 2005 Database On 80 Compatibility Mode And DTS Import
Mar 11, 2008
Hi,
We are planning to upgrage our SS 2000 databases(couple of hundreds) to SS 2005.
To minimise the potential work arounds, it is agreed to have complex databases, continue running on compatibility mode 80. What are the potential impact of having database on mode 80(apart from not being able to use new feature)on SS2005?
Fruther how we can we import SS 2000 DTSs to SS 2005 SSIS in an cluster environment?
Thanks,
Sajish
Db Maintenance Plans On SQL 2005 And Dbs In 2000 Compatibility Mode
Nov 15, 2007
Hi All
I€™m having a problem setting up maintenance plans on one of our SQL 2005 servers but first here€™s a bit of back ground.
The server is a Virtual machine running win2k3R2 SP2 server std and SQL 2k5, A supplier arrived to install and app on the server when discovering there app didn€™t work with 2k5 they seem to have set the 2 dbs on the server into 2k compatibility mode and set the entire SQL install to think its a 2000 install. (I€™m not sure how this is done all I can see is the wrong version number in management studio) The problem this is giving me it that the folder in management studio for Database Maintenance Plans is no longer under the management folder instead it under a sub folder called Legacy (which is how management studio seems to deal with all registered 2000 instances) and as such a can no longer right click and create new database maintenance plans is there any way around this or will I have to setup my backup job manually?
Ohh and have the supplier shot at dawn
Thanks All
Jon
SQL Server Express 2005 Warning Message In Event Log From SQL Browser Service
May 1, 2007Hello,
I have been trying to drill down to the cause for this event log message:
"The configuration of the AdminConnectionTCP protocol in the SQL instance
SQLEXPRESS is not valid."
It is reported from the SQLBrowser service as a warning when the service
starts. I have tried starting SQLBrowser.exe with -c flag, but the output reveals no
errors. I have seen this error on three computers. Two are running SQL 2000, 2005
and Express. One was only running Express, but still this message.
I then looked into the log for the SQL Express server itself. It shows this
message on startup:
"Dedicated administrator connection support was not started because it is
not available on this edition of SQL Server. This is an informational message
only. No user action is required."
Now, it appears to me that these two messages may relate to the same
"error" (or rather behaviour by design). So, can anyone confirm that the
warning in the event log from the SQL Browser service occurs becuase of that
the SQL Express edition doesn't allow any "AdminConnection", but the SQL
Browser service isn't aware of that SQL Express edition shouldn't support that, and
reports it as a warning (implying that we can't do much about this warning)?
Thanks for any input on this issue!
MSSQL 2005: Backward Compatibility Problem With Database Owner
Nov 25, 2005Hello all,i'm moving all my development to the new 2005/Fw2 environment.Now, i have an MSSQL 2005 server on the development server. To restore an existing database, i've created a new database with MSSQL 2000 compatibility level, and i've restored the backup over it. Everything seems ok, but when i try to create a diagram, i get the following error message:"Database diagram support objects cannot be installed because the database does not have a valid owner. To continue, first use the Files page of the Database Properties dialog box or the ALTER AUTHORIZATION statement to set the database owner to a valid login, then add the database diagram support objects."I've checked the properties and there seems to be the right owner (sa). If i create a new database with 2005 compatibility level, everithing works fine.Where is the problem?Also, a side question: by setting compatibility level to 2000, is it correct that the database can be deployed to a 2000 Server environment with no problems?Thanks in advance for any advice. -LV
View 4 Replies View RelatedMissing Compatibility Level Sql Server 2005(90) In Database Properties Options
Jul 13, 2007I installed SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition. When i create a new database (using the "New Database" dialog) i cannot set the new database's compatibility level to "SQL Server 2005(90)" because this option is not in the "dropdown list". the only items shown are: "SQL Server 7.0(70)" and "SQL Server 2000(80)". I set the owner to "sa". How do i get "SQL Server 2005(90)" in my "compatibility level" drop down list? Is this an installation option that i missed? Thanks in advance for any assistance!
-chris
SQL Server 2005 Running In 2000 Compatibility Mode And Reporting Services
Sep 17, 2007Can you run SQL Server 2005 in SQL Server 2000 compatibility mode and still use it with Reporting Services 2005?
View 4 Replies View Related