hallo i have an expression like this
CASE
when (a1<>a2 AND b1=b2 AND c1=c2) then...
when (a1=a2 AND b1<>b2 AND c1=c2) then...
when (a1= a2 AND b1=b2 AND c1<>c2) then...
is there any more elegant/compact/fast way to write this?
This question is from a deveoper that I work with:
In SQL Server 7.0:
Do you know of a query or sp which will return the list of objects in a DB, sorted in descending order by last changed date?
I need to generate a list of all the stored procedures created or modified since a specified date. I can get the created ones, but I can't see how to get the modified ones.
Thanks!
Any ideas on how to tackle this one?
Thanks,
Brad
I have implemented a login audit on a particular system which catches the users login details, including their application logon name and NT username.
What I want to do is report on users who have logged on to the software using someone else's workstation (i.e. logged on to more than one workstation).
Here's some sample stuff to play with
DECLARE @logins table (
loginName char(20)
, ntUsername char(25)
, loginDate datetime
)
--Insert test data. Please note that loginName and ntUsername are rarely the same
INSERT INTO @logins (loginName, ntUsername, loginDate)
SELECT 'Amy', 'Amy', '20070101' UNION
SELECT 'Amy', 'Amy', '20070102' UNION
SELECT 'Amy', 'Amy', '20070103' UNION
SELECT 'Bob', 'Bob', '20070101' UNION
SELECT 'Bob', 'Bob', '20070102' UNION
SELECT 'Bob', 'Amy', '20070103' UNION --Bob has logged on using 2 different NT accounts
SELECT 'Cal', 'Cal', '20070102' UNION
SELECT 'Cal', 'Amy', '20070102' UNION --So has cal
SELECT 'Dom', 'Dom', '20070102' UNION
SELECT 'Dom', 'Dom', '20070102'
Any ideas? I just can't think of the logic needed to get what I want.
Any extra info needed - just ask!
Cheers
I have the following query below that I am trying to get working. What I want it to do is check for users who have sat a module and failed it and compare it to a table to check that they have not passed the module second time and report only those who have failed withg no passes. Query below.
SELECT DISTINCT dbo.PPS_SCOS.NAME, PPS_PRINCIPALS.NAME, pps_transcripts.date_created, score, max_score, status
FROM (dbo.PPS_SCOS JOIN dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS ON dbo.PPS_SCOS.SCO_ID = dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.SCO_ID)
JOIN dbo.PPS_PRINCIPALS ON dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.PRINCIPAL_ID = dbo.PPS_PRINCIPALS.PRINCIPAL_ID
WHERE dbo.PPS_SCOS.NAME LIKE 'MTB-S001%'
AND PPS_PRINCIPALS.LOGIN LIKE '%test%'
AND dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.STATUS LIKE 'F'
AND PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.TICKET not like 'l-%'
AND dbo.PPS_PRINCIPALS.NAME NOT IN (
SELECT DISTINCT dbo.PPS_SCOS.NAME FROM (dbo.PPS_SCOS JOIN dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS ON dbo.PPS_SCOS.SCO_ID = dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.SCO_ID)
JOIN dbo.PPS_PRINCIPALS ON dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.PRINCIPAL_ID = dbo.PPS_PRINCIPALS.PRINCIPAL_ID
WHERE dbo.PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.STATUS LIKE 'P'
AND dbo.PPS_SCOS.NAME LIKE 'MTB-S001%'
AND PPS_PRINCIPALS.LOGIN LIKE '%test%'
AND PPS_TRANSCRIPTS.TICKET not like 'l-%' )
ORDER BY pps_PRINCIPALS.NAME
Any help appreciated.
Thanks
got a quick question guys.
if i use this to parse the current date to the right side of the time.
right(getdate(),7) - i'll get something like 7:30AM.
i also have Times stored in a column of a table, but as a string not a date time.
it seems to compare okay, but when the time is say 1:30PM and im comparing it if its greater than or equal to (>=)to 7:30AM - it doesnt return.
i think its ignoring the AM/PM Meridian Values and just comparing the numbers.
is there a conversion i could use to do this?
ive tried a military time conversion i found but it converts to hrs,min,milliseconds.
convert(char(8),(convert(datetime,current_timestam p,113)),114)
if anyone knows a good way to do this - i would appreciate it.
thanks again
rik
I've been reading a bit about full-text searches, phonetic values and match-queries and just don't know where to begin.
What I'm eventually going to do, is make procedures for matching names, finding records that are close matches and presenting them in a subform below the actual member that you look up.
E.g. if an employee looks up Sergej, he or she will also see Sergey, Sergei etc. below the membersheet.
BOL isn't very practical in examples, and its about 7 years since I took my SQL-Server 7.0 MS courses, plus I've primarily worked as an administrator up until last fall, not a developer. So where to begin?
Thanks in advance,
Trin
hi guys,
another question for today (maybe another silly q :P)..
can somebody shorten my case statement :-
i want to have NULL for RUdf1 til RUdf10 columns and CUdf1 til CUdf10 if it follow condition "select vblablaba'
currently im doing like below, that will take 20 CASE statement in my select statement!
CASE WHEN exists (select p.picktype from tblItemPickFormat p
where p.ItemClientRef=r.ItemClientRef AND (p.PickType=c.ClientUDF1) ) THEN RecvUDf1
ELSE NULL END AS RecvUDF1, --this one until 10
CASE WHEN exists (select p.picktype from tblItemPickFormat p
where p.ItemClientRef=r.ItemClientRef AND (p.PickType=c.ClientUDF1) ) THEN ClientUDf1
ELSE NULL END AS ClientUDF1, --this one until 10
so total 20.. phewwww... helppppp
What is the best method for ignoring the time in datetime comparisons. Say I want all records on 07/08/1996 regardless of their time. Or all records between 01/01/1999 and 04/01/1999 even if one of the records on 04/01/1999 had a time of 16:32:22
View 5 Replies View RelatedThis looks like a bug - hopefully somebody can explain what is actuallyhappening. Using SQL Server 2000 SP4.Here's a repro script with comments:/* repro table */CREATE TABLE dbo.T (ID int NOT NULL,Time datetime NOT NULL,CONSTRAINT PK_T PRIMARY KEY (ID, Time))GO/* the problem does not happen without this index */CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_T ON dbo.T (Time)GO/*sample row - note thatCAST('2006-04-08 13:14:58.870' AS smalldatetime) = '2006-04-08 13:15:00'*/INSERT INTO dbo.T (ID, Time)VALUES (1, '2006-04-08 13:14:58.870')GO/*This does not return any rows - why?The comparison should evaluate to TRUE.*/SELECT *FROM dbo.TWHERE CAST(Time as smalldatetime) >= '2006-04-08 13:15:00'GO/*This does return the row.*/SELECT *FROM dbo.TWHERE CAST(DATEADD(millisecond, 0, Time) as smalldatetime) >='2006-04-08 13:15:00'GODROP TABLE dbo.TGOThe difference between the two SELECT statements is that the first one usesa non-clustered index seek, whereas the second one uses a scan of the sameindex.--(remove a 9 to reply by email)
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to compare the ADDRESS FIELDS Between 2 tables in SQL SERVER 2008. However when I run the comparisons below it throws the error below:
Query:
select
inner
JOIN TABLE2 B
ON
COLLOAN=
COLLOAN1
a.ADDRESS<>b.PropertyAdd
Error : Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_Pref_CP437_CI_AS" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_BIN" in the equal to operation.
WHERE
A.Address ,b.PropertyAdd
,a.*
from TABL1 A
This query brings back 2 rows for each record, one for each case statement. How can I change this to bring in the contsupp.notes for both types of data? Or could it be fixed in the joins?
select
contact1.accountno,
contact1.key5 as "Ch#",
contact2.uexpsort as "Sort",
contact1.company as "Church",
contact1.contact as "Editor",
contact1.phone1 as "Phone",
contact2.uemerg as "Emergency",
contact1.Address1 as "Address",
contact1.city as "City",
contact1.state as "State",
contact1.zip as "Zip",
contact2.ubulletnqt as "Qty",
contact2.ubullcolor as "BullColor",
contact2.ubarcode as "Barcode",
contact2.udelivery as "Delivery",
contact2.uoutputdev as "OutputDev",
contact2.utimedeliv as "Time",
contact2.ucolor as "DelivColor",
contact2.ucollated as "Collated",
contact2.ustapled as "Stapled",
case when contsupp.contsupref = 'Delivery Notes' then contsupp.notes end as "Deliverynotes",
case when contsupp.contsupref = 'Cover Change Slip' then contsupp.notes end as "CoverChangeSlip"
from
Contact1 inner join contact2 on Contact1.Accountno = Contact2.Accountno
inner join contsupp on Contact1.Accountno=Contsupp.Accountno
where
contact1.key5 not like '' and contsupp.contsupref='Delivery Notes' or contsupp.contsupref ='Cover Change Slip' order by contact1.key5
Thanks for your help
How do i add multiple case statements
CREATE procedure rpt_blankregistrationquestions
@cmb1 as varchar(100),
@cmb2 as varchar(100) WITH ENCRYPTION
AS
BEGIN
SELECT DISTINCT
Child.surname + ', ' + Child.forename AS ChildName,
permissionRequired.description,
healthitems.description,
dietaryneeds.description,
CASE WHEN permissionRequired.active = 1 THEN 'YES'
WHEN permissionRequired.active = 0 THEN 'NO'
END AS Child_Permission
CASE WHEN healthitems.description.active = 1 THEN 'YES'
WHEN healthitems.description.active = 0 THEN 'NO'
END AS Health_Permission
CASE WHEN dietaryneeds.description.active = 1 THEN 'YES'
WHEN dietaryneeds.description.active = 0 THEN 'NO'
END AS Dietaryneeds_Permission
FROM healthItems CROSS JOIN
DietaryNeeds CROSS JOIN
permissionRequired CROSS JOIN
Child
ORDER BY ChildName
END
I have a pretty intensive query that I need performance help on. There are ~1 million de-normalized 'adjustment rows' that I am checking about 20 different conditions on, but each of these conditions has multiple possibile entries.
For example, one condition is 'what counties apply' to each row? Now I could cross-join a table listing every county that applies to every row, which would mean 1 million rows X 3,000 potential counties. And for every one of these 20 condition, I'd need to be joining tables for each of these lookups.
Instead, I was told to do a binary comparison of some sort, but I'm not exactly sure of how to do it. This way, I'm not needing to do any joins, but just have a large binary string, with bits representing each county.
Since each query I know the exact county searched, I can see if each row applies (along with each of the other conditions I must check vs the other binary strings).
I accomplished this using:
AND Substring(County, @CountyIndex, 1) = '1'
I have a character string for county, which is painfully slow when running all of these checks.
My hope is if the county in the lookup is 872, I can just scan the table, looking at bit #872 for the county field in each record, rather than joining huge tables for every one of these fixed fields I need to test.
My guess is the fastest way is some sort of binary string comparisons, but I can't find any good resources on the subject. PLEASE HELP!
I have a pretty intensive query that I need performance help on. There are ~1 million de-normalized 'adjustment rows' that I am checking about 20 different conditions on, but each of these conditions has multiple possibile entries.
For example, one condition is 'what counties apply' to each row? Now I could cross-join a table listing every county that applies to every row, which would mean 1 million rows X 3,000 potential counties. And for every one of these 20 condition, I'd need to be joining tables for each of these lookups.
Instead, I was told to do a binary comparison of some sort, but I'm not exactly sure of how to do it. This way, I'm not needing to do any joins, but just have a large binary string, with bits representing each county.
Since each query I know the exact county searched, I can see if each row applies (along with each of the other conditions I must check vs the other binary strings).
I accomplished this using:
AND Substring(County, @CountyIndex, 1) = '1'
I have a character string for county, which is painfully slow when running all of these checks.
My hope is if the county in the lookup is 872, I can just scan the table, looking at bit #872 for the county field in each record, rather than joining huge tables for every one of these fixed fields I need to test.
My guess is the fastest way is some sort of binary string comparisons, but I can't find any good resources on the subject. PLEASE HELP!
I'm unable to specify multiple columns in my order by statement if i use a case statement.
Does anyone know why this is, or what syntax would make this work?
Thanks
SELECT ....
ORDER BY (CASE Lower(@SortExpression)
WHEN 'prodname' THEN prodname, prodprice
WHEN 'prodsize' THEN prodsize, prodname
WHEN 'prodprice' THEN prodprice, prodname
Else prodcompany, prodname
END)
I know I should know the answer to this, but I just can't quite get the syntax down
Code:
Select case when zipCode = '10185' Then 'Deliver'
Else when zipCode = '2309' And paid = 'Yes' Then 'Deliver'
Else When zipCode = '1291' And paid = 'Yes' Then 'Deliver'
Else When zipCode = '88221' And paid = 'No' Then 'Hold'
Else when zipCode = '34123' Then 'Deliver'
End
From postalDeliveryDatabase
Hi
I'm not sure if I have stated my subject line correctly for what I want to achieve, but I will attempt to explain it below.
In addition to what I have in my script below, I also need to include the following clauses:
1. where TransPerPaySequence.FinancialYTDCode like '2007', and e.EmployeeStatusCode like 'CASUAL' and p.PositionGroupCode like 'AC', then instead of using the divisor of 72, it needs to be 35; and
2. where TransPerPaySequence.FinancialYTDCode like '2008', and e.EmployeeStatusCode like 'CASUAL' and p.PositionGroupCode like 'AC', then instead of using the divisor of 72 or 35, it needs to be 31.
I would really appreciate any assistance that can be provided.
Thanks
SELECT DISTINCT
pc.PositionClassificationCode, pc.Description AS positionclass, pg.PositionGroupCode, pg.Description AS positiongroup, p.Description AS position,
e.PreferredName + ' ' + e.LastName AS employeename, SUM(ha.Quantity)
/ ((CASE p2.PositionGroupCode WHEN 'AC' THEN 72 WHEN 'AL' THEN 75 WHEN 'EX' THEN 80 WHEN 'MG' THEN 80 WHEN 'SM' THEN 80 END) *
(SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT PaySequence) AS Expr1
FROM TransPerPaySequence
WHERE (PayPeriodCode LIKE 'EIT') AND (Closed = '1') AND (Description LIKE 'St%'))) AS FTE,
(SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT PaySequence) AS Expr1
FROM TransPerPaySequence AS TransPerPaySequence_1
WHERE (PayPeriodCode LIKE 'EIT') AND (Closed = '1') AND (Description LIKE 'St%')) AS payseq
FROM HistoricalAllowance AS ha LEFT OUTER JOIN
Position AS p ON ha.PositionCode = p.PositionCode LEFT OUTER JOIN
PositionGroup AS pg ON p.PositionGroupCode = pg.PositionGroupCode LEFT OUTER JOIN
PositionClassification AS pc ON p.PositionClassificationCode = pc.PositionClassificationCode LEFT OUTER JOIN
WAP ON ha.WAPCode = WAP.WAPCode LEFT OUTER JOIN
Employee AS e ON ha.EmployeeCode = e.EmployeeCode LEFT OUTER JOIN
Position AS p2 ON e.PositionCode = p2.PositionCode LEFT OUTER JOIN
TransPerPaySequence AS tpps ON ha.PaySequence = tpps.PaySequence
WHERE (e.EmployeeCode IN ('83', '739')) AND (ha.AllowanceCode IN ('005', '201', '203', '101')) AND (tpps.FinancialYTDCode LIKE '2007%')
GROUP BY pc.PositionClassificationCode, pg.PositionGroupCode, pc.Description, pg.Description, p.Description, e.PreferredName, e.LastName,
p2.PositionGroupCode
So I'm thinking if I can have multiple statements within the CASE-THEN..or do I have to CASE out each individually? Kind of like this....
CASE
WHEN [AddressType] = 'M'
THEN [MailingAddress].[Address1]
[MailingAddress].[Address2]
[MailingAddress].[City]
[MailingAddress].[State]
[MailingAddress].[Zipcode]
WHEN [AddressType] = 'D'
THEN [DefaultAddress].[Address1]
[DefaultAddress].[Address2]
[DefaultAddress].[City]
[DefaultAddress].[State]
[DefaultAddress].[Zipcode]
I have to do following scenario,
if 1st query Then 2nd Query
Else 'Msg'
How Can i do this using Case Statement??how can do this by Other way??
I have 4 tables involved here. The priority table is TABLE1:
NAMEID TRANDATE TRANAMT RMPROPID TOTBAL
000001235 04/14/2014 335 A0A00 605
000001234 04/14/2014 243 A0A01 243
000001236 04/14/2014 425 A0A02 500
TRANAMT being the amount paid & TOTBAL being the balance due per the NAMEID & RMPROPID specified.
The other table includes a breakdown of the total balance, in a manner of speaking, by charge code (thru a SUM(OPENAMT) query of DISTINCT CHGCODE
TABLE2
NAMEID TRANDATE TRANAMT RMPROPID CHGCODE OPENAMT
000001234 04/01/2014 400 A0A01 ARC 0
000001234 04/05/2014 -142 A0A01 ARC 228
000001234 04/10/2014 15 A0A01 ALT 15
000001235 04/01/2014 400 A0A00 ARC 400
000001235 04/05/2014 50 A0A00 ALT 50
000001235 04/10/2014 105 A0A00 ACF 105
000001235 04/11/2014 50 A0A00 ADR 50
000001236 04/01/2014 500 A0A02 ARC 500
The other table stores the priority order of the charge codes
TABLE3
CHGCODE PRIORITY DESCRPTN
ACF 1 Court fee
ALT 2 Late fee
ANS 3 NSF fee
ARC 4 Rent
ADR 5 Repair
AUR 6 Utility
While the forth stores the customer data:
TABLE4
NAMEID RMPROPID FIRSTNAME LASTNAME NAMEGROUP
000001234 A0A01 Jane Doe 000001234
000001235 A0A00 John White 000001235
000001236 A0A02 John Smith 000001236
000001237 A0A02 Jennifer Smith 000001236
This table's importance comes by the inclusion of the NAMEGROUP. This way if an account has multiple NAMEIDs, it can be kept straight by their shared NAMEGROUP.
I am trying to create a report using queries that will:
A) calculate the sum of the OPENAMT per NAMEGROUP per DISTINCT CHGCODE B) count the number of records (DISTINCT CHGCODEs) per DISTINCT NAMEID in ORDER by the CHGCODE PRIORITY Then C) calculate a case query whereas:
CASE WHERE
TABLE1.TRANAMT=> the calculated sum of the highest priority CHGCODE THEN 'TABLE1.TRANAMT'
ELSE WHERE TABLE1.TRANAMT <= the calculated sum of the highest priority CHGCODE
THEN 'the calculated sum of the highest priority CHGCODE'
...then...
CASE WHERE
[Code] ....
The results should be something like:
NAMEID TRANDATE TRANAMT RMPROPID CHGCODE APPLAMT
000001235 04/14/2014 335 A0A00 ACF 105
000001235 04/14/2014 335 A0A00 ALT 15
000001235 04/14/2014 335 A0A00 ARC 215
000001234 04/14/2014 243 A0A01 ALT 15
000001234 04/14/2014 243 A0A01 ARC 228
000001236 04/14/2014 425 A0A02 ARC 425
Also with a remaining balance (per CHGCODE) column.I can't figure out how to word the queries.
I want to update multiple column in one table using with case statement. i need query pls..
stdidnamesubject result marks
1 arun chemistry pass 55
2 alias maths pass 70
3 babau history pass 55
4 basha hindi NULL NULL
5 hussain hindi NULL nULL
6 chandru chemistry NULLNULL
7 mani hindi NULLNULL
8 rajesh history NULLNULL
9 rama chemistry NULLNULL
10 laxman maths NULLNULL
How do I properly write a CASE statement for the following business logic:
I want three of the following fields to be true in order to return 'Y'.
For example:
If field name 'Accepted' = 1 AND field 'StepNo' = '1' and field 'Visit' = 'V1'
Otherwise, I want it to return 'N'.
I have tried the following code below and it is not working.
, CASE WHEN Accepted = '1' AND StepNo ='1' AND Visit ='V1'
THEN 'Y' ELSE 'N' END AS 'StatusQ (Col N)'
I have a query with huge number of case statements. Basically I need to short this query with getting rid of these hundreds of CASE statements.
Because of the nature of the application I am not allowed to use a function, and just wondering if there is a possible way to rewrite this with COALESCE().
SELECT
CASE WHEN A.[COL_1] LIKE '%cricket%' THEN 'ck' + ',' ELSE '' END +
CASE WHEN A.[COL_1] LIKE '%soccer%' THEN 'sc' + ',' ELSE '' END +
....
CASE WHEN A.[RESIUTIL_DESC] LIKE '%base%ball' THEN 'BB' + ',' ELSE '' END
FROM TableName A
How can I change my T-SQL text editor from text sensitive to text insensitive?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello:
I have created an SQL server table in the past on a server that was all case sensative. Over time I found out that switching to a server that is not case sensative still caused my data to become case sensative. I read an article that said you should rebuild your master database then re-create your tables. So after rebuilding the master database, a basic restore would not be sufficient? I would have to go and manually re-create every single table again?
Any suggestions?
Can someone point me to a tutorial on how to search against a SQL Server 2000 using a case insensitive search when SQL Server 2000 is a case sensitive installation?
thanks in advance.
We need to install CI database on CS server, and there are some issueswith stored procedures.Database works and have CI collation (Polish_CI_AS). Server hascoresponding CS collation (Polish_CS_AS). Most queries and proceduresworks but some does not :-(We have table Customer which contains field CustomerID.Query "SELECT CUSTOMERID FROM CUSTOMER" works OK regardless ofcharacter case (we have table Customer not CUSTOMER)Following TSQL generate error message that must declare variable @id(in lowercase)DECLARE @ID INT (here @ID in uppercase)SELECT @id=CustomerID FROM Customer WHERE .... (here @id in lowercase)I know @ID is not equal to @id in CS, but database is CI and tablenames Customer and CUSTOMER both works. This does not work forvariables.I suppose it is tempdb collation problem (CS like a server collationis). I tried a property "Identifier Case Sensitivity" for myconnection, but it is read only and have value 8 (Mixed) by default -this is OK I think.DO I MISS SOMETHING ????
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am working in a SQL server database that is configured to be case-insensetive but I would like to override that for a specific query. How can I make my query case-sensitive with respect to comparison operations?
Jacob
I have column with value of all upper case, for example, FIELD SERVICE, is there anyway, I can convert into Field Service?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am curious with using replication in sql server 2005 one way from db A (source) replicating to db B(destination) in which db A has a collation of CS and db B has a collation of CI. Will there be any problems with this scenario? Thanks in advance!
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a view where I'm using a series of conditions within a CASE statement to determine a numeric shipment status for a given row. In addition, I need to bring back the corresponding status text for that shipment status code.
Previously, I had been duplicating the CASE logic for both columns, like so:
Code Block...beginning of SQL view...
shipment_status =
CASE
[logic for condition 1]
THEN 1
WHEN [logic for condition 2]
THEN 2
WHEN [logic for condition 3]
THEN 3
WHEN [logic for condition 4]
THEN 4
ELSE 0
END,
shipment_status_text =
CASE
[logic for condition 1]
THEN 'Condition 1 text'
WHEN [logic for condition 2]
THEN 'Condition 2 text'
WHEN [logic for condition 3]
THEN 'Condition 3 text'
WHEN [logic for condition 4]
THEN 'Condition 4 text'
ELSE 'Error'
END,
...remainder of SQL view...
This works, but the logic for each of the case conditions is rather long. I'd like to move away from this for easier code management, plus I imagine that this isn't the best performance-wise.
This is what I'd like to do:
Code Block
...beginning of SQL view...
shipment_status =
CASE
[logic for condition 1]
THEN 1
WHEN [logic for condition 2]
THEN 2
WHEN [logic for condition 3]
THEN 3
WHEN [logic for condition 4]
THEN 4
ELSE 0
END,
shipment_status_text =
CASE shipment_status
WHEN 1 THEN 'Condition 1 text'
WHEN 2 THEN 'Condition 2 text'
WHEN 3 THEN 'Condition 3 text'
WHEN 4 THEN 'Condition 4 text'
ELSE 'Error'
END,
...remainder of SQL view...
This runs as a query, however all of the rows now should "Error" as the value for shipment_status_text.
Is what I'm trying to do even currently possible in T-SQL? If not, do you have any other suggestions for how I can accomplish the same result?
Thanks,
Jason
I am working on a C#/asp.net web application. The application has a text box that allows a user to enter a name. The name is then saved to the database.
Before the name is saved to the database, I need to be able to check if the name already exists in the database. The problem here is that what if the name is in the database as "JoE ScMedLap" and somoene enters the name as "Joe Schmedlap" which already exists in the database,but just differs in case.
In other words how do deal with case sensitiviy issues.
Yesterday I received a response to my CI/CS Collation problem and therecommendation was to try and restore a CI Collation database to a CSCollation database. After creating a blank CS database a full restore(Force restore over existing database) does change the Collation toCI. I'm unsure as to how I can restore without changing theCollation. Any suggestions?
View 2 Replies View Related