Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express
select @@trancount
begin tran
select @@trancount
use ProdNetPerfMon
select @@trancount
update Nodes set Caption = 'xxxx' where Vendor = 'yyyy'
select @@trancount
commit tran
select @@trancount
Executes as expected including trancount without errors.
Nodes.Caption is updated but reverts after a few minutes.
sa privileges
What am I missing?
Hi,
I want to rollback my t-sql if it encounters an error. I wrote this code:
begin tran mytrans;
insert into table1 values (1, 'test');
insert into table1 values (1, 'jsaureouwrolsjflseorwurw'); -- it will encounter error here since max value to be inputted is 10
commit tran mytrans;
I forced my insert to have an error by putting a value that exceeds the data size. However, I didn't do any rollback. Anything i missed out?
cherriesh
Hi,
Reviewing the MSSQL process info screen, I am seeing the same process appear a numer of times. It is always the same, being
'IF @@TRANCOUNT > 0 COMMIT TRAN'
Sometimes, there can be up to a hundred of these processes (listed in the process info screen). They generally have a 'sleeping' status, but nonetheless, I would like to see these processes disappear if they are not being used.
I have checked in all of the stored procedures and triggers in the application, and none have this sql statement.
When I run profiler, I get these entries, but the profiler says they belong to either SQL Enterprise Manager or 'Microsoft Windows 2000 Operating System', and not to the application I am running.
Does anyone know where these transactions come from? Can I prevent these from appearing? If no, what is the impact (other than sql server having to maintain a connection).
Thanks,
Jim
Hi
Can you think about any reason for why when using a transaction after the COMMIT TRAN the inserted new record is not in the table and there is a gap in the identity????
I'm using SQL 2000 SP3, there are no triggers are on the table and it happanes only under heavy load.
Thanks,
Inon.
Do delete/update statements in MS SQL Server need a "commit" (or equivalent) run after them as they do in Oracle?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi ,
I've tried to switch MS-Sql/Server 6.5 on explicit_transactions
without success.
(set implicit_transaction on/off)
What is the exact syntax for doing that ?
Herve
(PS: Thanks Gregory for your quick answer )
Hi All,
I don't know MS-SQLserver internal system at all. I 've just used Oracle
a couple years ago and so in some cases (e.g using TP-monitor MTS or Tuxedo)
you can switch off the implicit transaction by using
the option AUTOCOMMIT ON/OFF.
How can switch off the implicit transaction system on MS-SQLServer ?
In advance thanks,
Herve
l also use the
begin transaction
select ........etc
commit
structure when l wrtite queries.My problem is that if l close the query analyser it asks me to commit transaction before l exit. Why?
How do you check for uncommitted trans and commit them?
I built this in SQL query analyzer to update all records with the 1/1/02 date:
update tbl.EMPPOS set EFFECT_DATE = '2005-01-01'
where EFFECT_DATE = '2002-01-01';
when I run the query it updates and shows records in the lower window, but the tbl isn't altered. What is wrong with my syntax ??
thanks,
hi friends,
Iam Executing the sp logic.suppose incase if any problem occurs inbetween execution(NO SPACE,communication failure,log full)
data is getting commited partially insteady of rollbacking entire transaction.
CREATE procedure RBI_Control_sp
as
begin
set nocount on
--Checking the count before truncating
exec fin_ods..count_sp
--Truncating the Table
exec fin_ods..trun_sp
--Data Transfer
exec fin_ods..RBI_Data_Transfer_sp
--Checking the count after Data transfer
exec fin_ods..count_sp
--temp table Table population,Fetching data from the fin_ods[erp Table]
exec FIN_wh..RBI_SPExecution_sp
set nocount off
end
I have a cursor loop through a set of records that looks something like this.
OPEN database_cursor
FETCH NEXT FROM database_cursor
INTO @iID
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
update table 1
update table
......
FETCH NEXT FROM database_cursor
INTO @iID
END
CLOSE database_cursor
DEALLOCATE database_cursor
Is there a way i could put all the UPDATE statements within a transaction. either everything goes or nothing.THnaks
Thanks,
I've a complex stored procedure, that makes a lot of insert, update,delete and so on.I would like to make some commits durint this sp, but of course theyare not "real" commit because who call the sp could decide for arollback.But I know that this commit has to be real. In fact, the transactionlog grows really too much during the execution.Is there a way to force a commit durint a sp ?thank you very much!
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an SSIS package that iterates through a thousand or so download text files, parses them and inserts the results into a database via a Stored procedure and an OLE DB Command.
For the most part this process works without any issues, yet I keep obtaining random errors on a DT_STR (500) column. I have reviewed the data extensively and this column - which is the same across all of the rows - does not appear to be any different.
The rest of the rows before and after the error rows all insert properly but these rows consistently fail in the OLE DB task with the following error:
[OLE DB Command [35549]] Error: An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E14. An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "The incoming tabular data stream (TDS) remote procedure call (RPC) protocol stream is incorrect. The RPC name is invalid.".
When I inserted the rows into an errors table, I found that the error code, -1071607698, is not defined and the only thing I could find online was a reference to:
DTS_E_COMMANDDESTINATIONADAPTERSTATIC_UNAVAILABLE
which appears to be a DTS error and not an SSIS error.
I have added tasks to explicitly verify the length of the field and that field actually inserts without any issues into the error table - which has the exact same column definition as the target table.
I am at a complete loss as to how to proceed - does anybody have an idea?
when doing an 'update table set field1 = 'N',using sql query analyzer, is the update committed immediately? If it isn't commited can a 'rollback' be executed, and what is the format of the rollback command?
How to implement two pase commit in SQL Server 2000, Is there Database Link link Oracle available here ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi,
I'm using an SQL Express database over a network, using a C# Express program. So I had to use pure SQL connections and commands instead of using Data Sources (couldn't find a way for it to work). In the program / DB I've got a couple of Master - Detail situations. Something like:
Product:
-----------
productID
(...)
Acessories:
----------------
acessID
(...)
ProductAcess:
--------------------
productID
acessID
So when inserting a new Product, I'll have to first insert the product (with product name, price, and so on) and once I get the product ID from the insert command, I'll insert the ProductAcess rows. I've found a problem in this though. If for some reason the insert of the product is successful, but the insert of ProductAcess fails, I've got a big mess in hands because I'll have a row in Product with no rows in ProductAcess (which shouldn't happen in my program scenario). I could solve this by deleting all rows from the DB which connected in someway to the product that failed to insert, but would be far better and correct if I used a commit command at the end of the insert commands to make sure only the right data would be inserted (saving time and resources). I use this all the time in Oracle databases, but don't know if it is possible in SQL Express... Is it? How? Thanks
Hi,
My data flow has several transformations:
1. Search an employee, if the employee already exists, update it, otherwise insert it.
2. Once the new employee is created, i have to get its id (with another search transformation )to update another table with it. This id is an autonumeric , thats the reason i have to get it once the record is inserted.
At this momment this second search transformation to get the assigned id for the new reacord doesnt find any employee... i suppose its because these new data is not commited in the database....
the question is, Its possible to force a commit?
Thanks!
This is a really wide spread - more than a time discussed - on SQL CE MSDN Forums - Issue !!!
Is there any way i can commit changes which happens during runtime (when i am developing the application) such as inserts/updates and deletes to the .sdf DB on the machine ?????
I have several sets of code that need to delete rows from more than one database at a time. The rows are basically linked without being identified as having a foreign key. This means I issue two deletes. If one fails, especially the second one, there is no way to roll the first delete back.Can someone either point me to some code that enables me to link the deletions, allowing me to insure that both are successful or both do not occur. I cannot identify any fields on the secondary database table as specifically linked to the primary, as the secondary database is a storage medium for images, that may be linked to more than one different table.TIA for any opinions, options, etc. Tom
View 2 Replies View RelatedI use loop to insert few record into a table:But the for_Loop only loop once and throw an error:"The variable name '@res_name' has already been declared. Variable names must be unique within a query batch or stored procedure."What should i do to get this fix?Code:Protected Sub confirm_button_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs)Dim DataSources1 As New SqlDataSource()DataSources1.ConnectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("ConnectionString").ToString()DataSources1.InsertCommandType = SqlDataSourceCommandType.TextDataSources1.InsertCommand = "INSERT INTO cust_order (res_name, my_menu) VALUES (@res_name, @my_menu)"Dim c As IntegerFor c = 0 To selectListBox.Items.Count - 1 Step +2DataSources1.InsertParameters.Add("res_name", selectListBox.Items(c).Text)DataSources1.InsertParameters.Add("my_menu", selectListBox.Items(c + 1).Text)DataSources1.Insert()Next End Sub
View 2 Replies View RelatedI first must delete any existing log for my current record.
Then verify that the "exec @res = gmw_updatesynclog..." has not failed and a delete log entry has been successfully written as verified by the gmw_updatesynclog's return of int 16.
If all is well then I incrment my counter and delete the record, here in testing I'm just updateing the activity code to del so I can find them, in live I'll just be deleting them.
--My error
Server: Msg 266, Level 16, State 2, Line 0
Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 2.
-- end my error
...excerpt from my proc and nested cursor....
------------------------------ begin calls to be deleted
if @rectype = 'C' and (len(rtrim(@notes))<20 or @notes is null)
begin transaction
delete gmtlog -- delete any older del log for this recid
where frecid = @recid
and fieldname = 'zzzDel'
and tableid ='"'
if @@error = 0 -- 0 or 1 rows affected...
exec @res = gmw_updatesynclog 'cal',@recid,'MASTER','D'
if @res <> 16 rollback transaction
goto endd --cleanup and fetch next record
if @res = 16 -- increment count_call_dels
set @count_call_dels = @count_call_dels +1
update cal -- update in test delete in live
set actvcode = 'DEL'
where recid = @recid
commit --transaction
------------------------------ end calls to be
... end excerpt...
TIA
JeffP...
Many times i write stoted procedures with transaction blocks.
I have delete a row after begin transaction and in continue i
read from table the select statement get back the deleted row:
begin tran
delete mytable
where id = @myid
and seqid = 3
select sum(balance)
from mytable
where id = @myid
............
...............
commit tran
.... OR
rollback tran
the sum(balance) function has calculate the balance of row 3
I use SQL 7.0
Thanks
Renato
Hi,
I have a procedure of 6500 lines in which i have given a save point at the beginning of the procedure. And am storing the error number in a variable through out the procedure using select of @@error. And at the end if my @error_number is not zero then am rolling back the tranasction else commit the transaction.
Its giving me the error
Msg 266, Level 16, State 2, Line 5437
Transaction count after execute indicates that a commit or rollback
transaction statement is missing. Previous count = 0, Current count = 1.
if l want to commit the transactions after every thousand how would l build it into the script?
Begin Transaction
Select a.AccountNo,
a.TransactionNo,
a.TransactionAmount,
a.TransactionDate
Into dbo.test1
From Trans_May_14Aug2002 a,Reds_JuL_Trans_08Jul2002 b
Where ltrim(rtrim(left(a.AccountNo,20)))=ltrim(rtrim(lef t(b.AccountNo,20)))
AND
ltrim(rtrim(left(a.TransactionNo,20)))=ltrim(rtrim (left(b.TransactionNo,20)))
AND
a.TransactionAmount=b.TransactionAmount
AND
a.TransactionDate =b.TransactionDate
AND
ltrim(rtrim(left(a.Product,20))) IN ('PR060','PR061','PR091',
'PR096','PR111','PR121',
'PR122')
AND ltrim(rtrim(left(a.Transactiontype,20))) IN
('TR001','TR003','TR011',
'TR013','TR027','TR028',
'TR042','TR043','TR044',
'TR045','TR998','TR999')
AND ltrim(rtrim(left(a.journaltype,20))) NOT IN
('JT000','JT720','JT721',
'JT722','JT723','JT725',
'JT726','JT729','JT730',
'JT737','JT738','JT739',
'JT740','JT743','JT746',
'JT751')
OR ltrim(rtrim(left(a.JournalType,20))) IS NULL
AND a.TransactionDate > '2002-04-30'AND b.transactionDate < '2002-07-01'
Commit
No I did not write this below, this is from a vendor, I used profiler and I believe their SP is causing a blocking problem on their vendor supplied DB. It thought at the least always have a begin end or a begin trans commit trans. ANy quick opinions greatly appreciated
create procedure write_planned_service_rec
@p1 varchar(20),@p2 varchar(20),@p3 varchar(20),@p4 varchar(20),@p5 varchar(20),
@p6 varchar(20),@p7 varchar(20),@p8 varchar(20),@p9 varchar(20),
@p10 varchar(20),@p11 varchar(20),@p12 varchar(20),@p13 varchar(20),@p14
varchar(20),
@p15 varchar(20),@p16 varchar(20),@p17 varchar(20),@p18 varchar(20),@p19
varchar(20),
@p20 varchar(20)
AS
IF @p20 = 'P'
update patient set date_insurance_updated = getdate() where patient_id =
@p1 and practice_id = @p13
Hi
I have an overnight process that takes transactions from an external system & applies updates to a single db table. Other processes may be active on the db but none touch the tables I'm using. I cannot guarantee the volume of source transactions (may vary from 100s to 100,000s).
My question is should I protect the update within a begin+commit/rollback or should I have a recovery procedure to run in the event of failure (that would delete any rows added to my db table)? (My preference is to do the latter - so I'm really looking for any reasons why I shouldn't take this approach).
Thanks.
I'm rusty on the tsql side. How do you save to a table from a sql statement. I'm testing for sp's.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI need a trigger to be fired or a stored procedure to be called on an event of COMMIT or ROLLBACK.
Non of ORACLE, SQL-SERVER, DB2 have this feature.
Please let me know any alternative's
hi friends,
Iam Executing the sp logic.suppose incase if any problem occurs inbetween execution(NO SPACE,communication failure,log full)
data is getting commited partially insteady of rollbacking entire transaction.
CREATE procedure RBI_Control_sp
as
begin
set nocount on
--Checking the count before truncating
exec fin_ods..count_sp
--Truncating the Table
exec fin_ods..trun_sp
--Data Transfer
exec fin_ods..RBI_Data_Transfer_sp
--Checking the count after Data transfer
exec fin_ods..count_sp
--temp table Table population,Fetching data from the fin_ods[erp Table]
exec FIN_wh..RBI_SPExecution_sp
set nocount off
end
Hi
Need a help for the below req.
I have a SP which calls another SP with in a Cursor. The main SP updated two of the DB tables. Based on the data passed from main SP the nested SP updates another two table.
What I want at the end of loop the transaction will be committed. In between if any point it fails means the whole transaction will be rollback.
I am using TRY & CATCH to handle transaction commit & Rollback . But I am getting below error
Error coming in SQL end is:
Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 0.
Please advise.
Hai, in Sql server 2000 database, i want to do the following..
from my UI, i will be updating one table(only 3 columns among the table columns), But the number of records will be around 2000 to 2500.
So every 200th record, i want to commit the transaction, so that i cannot lose the data..
Using query can i achieve this? or do i need to use the simple while loop logic.
Pls advise me
Hi,I still haven't got a decent book on relational databases :-)My stored procedure insert_wire inserts values into two tables (wire andcablewire). The wire_ref (primary key) will be the same for both inserts.However, if for any reason the first insert fails then I would like arollback system to take place. I have tried testing for an error (@@error<> 0) after the 1st transaction but I just get a syntax error. Am I goingdown the right lines here? Any tips appreciated.Thanks, Mary.CREATE procedure insert_wire(in wire_ref VARCHAR(22), in standardVARCHAR(16), in a_color VARCHAR(16), in material VARCHAR(22),in metres INTEGER, in amps FLOAT(3), in volts FLOAT(3), in ni SMALLINT, insome_comment VARCHAR(32))BEGINinsert into cablewirevalues(wire_ref, standard, a_color, material, metres, some_comment);insert into wirevalues(wire_ref, amps, volts, ni);commit;END!
View 1 Replies View RelatedLookup and commit; How it works
I am importing data from text file and I have data lookup to check reference table.
If the reference row doesn't exist I want to add row to reference table, other wise row is added to the detail table.
I am using oledb destination to saving reference table row with rows per batch to 1 and maximum insert commit size to 1.
When I run the package duplicate rows are in grid view. How can duplicates end in there the commit size is 1? Next time the data exists in reference table and should be going to detail not to reference table.