CTE - Union Hierarchy Tables By More Roots ID
Oct 4, 2013
I try to build some query on hierarchy data and after two days thinking about it i have null result. What I need is union more trees tables by root id to one table.
-- tree
-- this query is functional: OK
WITH tree (sid, parend_id, level) as
(
SELECT sid, parend_id, 0 as level
[Code] ....
But this query work with one root id (100); what can i do when i have more roots id ? -> generate each tree table separated by roots id and then all tables join to one (union).
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 7, 2005
I am trying to get a consolidated sum of all the columns of the two tables that I am Using the UNION on. I can not get the sum function to work or the group by.
SELECT T2.State,t2.Taxcode,
Taxable =
Case
When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)
Else 0
End,
'NonTaxable' =
Case
When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)
Else T1.DistribSum
End,
T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', (T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total'
FROM inv1 t1 inner JOIN oinv t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's'
UNION ALL
SELECT t2.state,t2.taxcode,
Taxable =
Case
When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then -(T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal))
Else 0
End,
'NonTaxable' =
Case
When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal))
Else T1.DistribSum
End,
-T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total'
FROM RIN1 t1 inner JOIN ORIN t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode
WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's'
order by T2.STATE
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2007
Hi,
I have three tables named as BroadCastetails,PaymetMaster,MemberMaster.
I have two query as mentioned below--
SELECT MemberMaster.FirstName, MemberMaster.LastName, BroadCastDetails.BroadCastName FROM BroadCastDetails INNER JOIN MemberMaster ON 5 = MemberMaster.MemberID AND BroadcastCreationDateTime between '01/01/2007' AND '12/12/2007'
SELECT BroadCastDetails.ScheduledStartDateTime, BroadCastDetails.TotalCalls FROM BroadCastDetails UNION SELECT PaymentTransaction.TransactionDate, PaymentTransaction.CallsToCredit FROM PaymentTransaction
I want the result of the above two query in a GridView.How can I do that ? Its urgent...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2003
Hi,
I have an Orders Table and a Freeshipping Table.
ORDERS
======
CustomerId OrderDate Quantity
========== ========= ========
1000 01/01/2003 5
1000 01/04/2003 9
1000 01/08/2003 14
2000 01/01/2003 4
1000 06/03/2003 9
4000 05/02/2003 4
FREESHIPPING
=============
CustomerID FreeDate
========== ========
1000 01/01/2003
1000 01/03/2003
How can I write a query that will return the following result to show the order details for customerid 1000
for a date range between 01/01/2003 and 01/08/2003
OrderDate Quantity FreeShipping
========= ======== ============
01/01/2003 5 Y
01/03/2003 0 Y
01/04/2003 9 N
01/08/2003 14 N
Note that even if an order was not placed and the date was a freeshipping date, it is still displayed in the resultset
Thanks in advance,
-ron
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2006
I have 2 Tables one called Reps and the other called STORES
I need to use a UNION statement but my Server is saying that the "UNION" is ERROR The Query Designer does not support the UNION SQL construct.
What command would I use to put these 2 tables together?
HELP!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2007
I have 2 temporary tables from a previous operation, Tab1 and Tab2, with the same dimensions. How do I create a third table Tab3 with the same dimensions containing the the combined rows of the 2 previous tables? TIA!
Tab1
Col1 Col2 Col3
A1 B1 C1
A2 B2 C2
Tab2
Col1 Col2 Col3
X1 Y1 Z1
X2 Y2 Z2
X3 Y3 Z3
After the required sql operation I should have
Tab3
Col1 Col2 Col3
A1 B1 C1
A2 B2 C2
X1 Y1 Z1
X2 Y2 Z2
X3 Y3 Z3
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2008
Hi there, I have some identical tables that I want to query for a search Is there anyway I can execute the unions first then a where command on all the tables at once I have tried using go but it doesn't seem to work, so I put the where statemtents at the end of each union for now. Here's my code:
strSQL = "SELECT * FROM england WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_
"UNION ALL SELECT * FROM ni WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_
"UNION ALL SELECT * FROM wales WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_
"UNION ALL SELECT * FROM scotland WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%'"
View 15 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2015
This query works perfectly and orders by just as I need
Code:
Select
'1st' As [Type],
#Uno.ID
#Uno.Address,
#Uno.shippingInfo
FROM #Uno
[Code] ....
However, when I use it in a Union All so I can pull data from 2 diff tables, the order by statement no longer works. How can I order by data in 2 tables?
Code:
Select
'1st' As [Type],
#Uno.ID
#Uno.Address,
#Uno.shippingInfo
FROM #Uno
[Code] ....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2007
Is it possible to combine the following tables:
Table1:
id
1
2
3
Table2:
licenses
3
2
1
To one table, like this:
id licenses
1 3
2 2
3 1
-There is always the same number of rows in both tables.
Thanks a lot!
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2007
Hello,
I'm using SQL2005, SP2
I have multiple temp tables with the same column structure that I would combine into into a single temp table using Unions.
Is this possible?
Example:
Select * From #temp1
Union All
Select * From #temp2
Union All
Select * From #temp3
Into #Temp4
I thought I would ask while I continue to research this in case someone came back with the solution before I was able to track it down elsewhere.
Thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2007
What is the standard way to union tables with exactly the same schema that are in different databases?
For example:
Code Block
USE db1 SELECT * FROM table1
UNION
USE db2 SELECT * FROM table2
this will return the following error:
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 3
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'use'.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2006
I have 2 tables
tblOpenSiteDates
Site: int
OpenDate: smalldate
Comment: VarChar
tblCloseSiteDates
Site: int
CloseDate: smalldate
Comments: VarChar
newLocationID: int
I am trying to get a view which would display a site with the open and close dates. Null is ok for a close date for those opens that are still open.. not every office has an open date and close date.. it is possible to have just a close date and not an open date (ie unsure of open date but I know its closing)
so the output would be
viewOpenCloseSites
Site: int
opendate: smalldate
closedate: smalldate
PLEASE HELP i just can not figure it out
thanks...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2012
I have two tables with data that I need to get and display in a combobox. What I want to do is have the parent table listed in the combobox with all of its children indented. Sorted by parent then by child.
This SQL seems to be more complex than I have done previously
I can get all of the records from both tables easily:
Code:
SELECT strName, ID FROM tblParents as pp
INNER JOIN tblChildren as cc
ON cc.pID = pp.uiGUID
UNION (SELECT strName FROM tblChildren as c
INNER JOIN tblParents as p
ON c.pID = p.ID)
However, this simply returns a list that is not ordered in any fashion. I'd like to have all of the parent's children shown under the parent name (there is only 1 parent per child and multiple children per parent)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2007
Hi!
I'm trying to get the results from three different tables, where they have some of the same results. I'm only interested in where they match and then trying to order by date (that's in three columns - M, D, Y). I read previous post in 9/07 but the result doesn't seem to order correctly. It does not have any rhyme or reason to the outputed results as it bounces back and forth through Oct, Nov and Dec posting and throughout all three tables. Here's my query below. Any ideas how I can get my ordering correct for all three tables to display all Oct, all Nov and all Dec?
Thanks so much
select date3, date2, date1, who, what
from
(
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shows
union
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shares
union
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from soiree
)
a order by date3, date2, date1
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2008
I have got the following union statement:
SELECT plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr,
FROM plan2008
GROUP BY plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr
UNION
SELECT fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr
FROM fsp_auftrag
GROUP BY fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr
My problem is that each table contains additional values like art_amount, art_turnover etc... whereby the first table contains plan values while the second table contains actual values.
My goal is to get plan as well as the actual values in one row, how is that possible? If I put the values into each of the selects I get two rows, which is not the wished output.
Is it possible to join the tables after the union took place?
Thanks in advance!
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2008
HI, Guys:
I've some AT_DATE tables (eg: AT_20080401, AT_20080402, ...) in SQLServer DB, and these AT_XX table have same columns. but table count could be variant, so I have to query sysobjects to get all of these tables. like this:
select name from sysobject where name like 'AT_%'
Now I try to create a view AT which is the union of all these AT_XX tables, such as:
Code Snippet
Create View AT as
select * from AT_20080401
union
select * from AT_20080402
union ...
but since I'm not sure how many tables there, it would be impossible to write SQL as above.
though I could get this union result via stored-procedure, view couldn't be created on the resultset of a procedure.
Create View AT as
select * from AT_createView() <-- AT_createView must be a function, not procedure
I've checked msdn, there is Multi-statement table-valued function, but this function type seems to create one temporary table, I don't want to involve much of insert operation because there could be more than 1million records totally in these AT_XX tables.
So is there any way to achived my goal?
any reference would be appreciated, thanks !
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2008
I'm trying to summarize costs assigned to active jobs for a manufacturing business. I need to aggregate work in process (WIP) cost that resides in labor-transaction and part-transaction tables based on transaction types, and transaction dates. Some transactions increase the WIP cost of the job while others decrease WIP. The business needs to see how much $$ is tied up in each job as of a particular date -- the calculation is:
ToDate (cost of materials and labor assigned to job)
- ToInv (cost of materials returned to inventory)
- ToSales (cost of materials sold).
I developed this query incrementally and, so far, the #ToDate, #ToInv, and #ToSales temp tables seem to be populating with the correct data. My thought was to combine these three tables with a UNION and then extract the grand totals and here's where I started getting the following error:
------------------------------------------
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'UNION'.
------------------------------------------
The problem is with the UNIONs going into #myTotal.
I would appreciate any help with this. Also, please let me know if you can suggest a better design for this. Thanks!
Below is a simplified version of my query:
--#ToDate
CREATE TABLE #ToDate (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2)
INSERT INTO #ToDate (JobNum, Cost)
--M&S To Date
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS Cost
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN ( <valid trans types> )
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
UNION -- This one works ok.
--L&B To Date
SELECT jh.JobNum,
sum(l.LaborRate*l.LaborHrs) + sum(l.BurdenRate*l.BurdenHrs) AS Cost
FROM LaborDtl l
JOIN JobHead jh ON l.JobNum = jh.JobNum
WHERE jh.JobReleased = 1
AND l.PayrollDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY jh.JobNum
--#ToInv
CREATE TABLE #ToInv (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2)
INSERT INTO #ToInv (JobNum, Cost)
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>)
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
--#ToSales
CREATE TABLE #ToSales (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2))
INSERT INTO #ToSales (JobNum, Cost)
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>)
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
--#myTotal
CREATE TABLE #myTotal (JobNum varchar(14), Cost decimal (16,2), Source varchar(9))
INSERT INTO #myTotal (JobNum, Cost, Source)
SELECT d.JobNum, SUM(d.Cost) AS Cost FROM #ToDate d GROUP BY d.JobNum ORDER BY d.JobNum
UNION -- Problem**********************
SELECT i.JobNum, SUM(-1*i.Cost) AS Cost FROM #ToInv i GROUP BY i.JobNum ORDER BY i.JobNum
UNION -- Problem**********************
SELECT s.JobNum, SUM(-1*s.Cost) AS Cost FROM #ToSales s GROUP BY s.JobNum ORDER BY s.JobNum
--Select grand total for each job
SELECT JobNum, SUM(Cost) FROM #myTotal ORDER BY JobNum
--Drop temp tables
DROP TABLE #ToDate
DROP TABLE #ToInv
DROP TABLE #ToSales
DROP TABLE #myTotal
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2014
Currently I have a standard query with a join to several tables. There are two additional tables MAS_CTB and MAS_STB. I would like to do a union between those two tables to get FIELDVALUE which will exist in either the CTB table or the STB table and then have that value be returned with the results of the original query.
I can of course write a UNION from the main query to the CTB and then to the STB table, however it's about 80 dummy fields I would have to replicate in the union which is why I was wondering if there was a more simple way.
Main Query:
SELECT Field1, Field2...Field80
From Table1
Join Table2
Union Portion:
Select FieldValue <------
From MAS_CTB
UNION
Select FieldValue <-----Return to main query above
From MAS_STB
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2014
SQL Server 2008 r2...
I have a query which does 3 selects and Union ALLs each to get a final result set. The performance is unacceptable - takes around a minute to run. If I remove the Union All so that the result sets are returned individually it returns all 3 from the query in around 6 seconds (acceptable performance).
Any way to join the result sets together without using Union All.
Each result set has exactly the same structure returned...
Query below [for reference]...
WITH cte AS (
SELECT A.[PoleID], ISNULL(B.[IsSpanClear], 0) AS [IsSpanClear], B.[SurveyDate], ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY A.[PoleID] ORDER BY B.[SurveyDate] DESC) rownum
FROM[UT_Pole] A
LEFT OUTER JOIN [UT_Surveyed_Pole] B ON A.[PoleID] = B.[PoleID]
[Code] .....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
Why the sequence different?
select * from (
select id=3,[name]='Z'
union all select 1,'G'
union all select 2,'R'
union all select 4,'Z'
) as t
order by [name]
--result:
---------
--1 G
--2 R
--4 Z
--3 Z
select * from (
select id=3,[name]='Z'
union select 1,'G'
union all select 2,'R'
union all select 4,'Z'
) as t
order by [name]
--result:
----------
--1 G
--2 R
--3 Z--changed
--4 Z
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2006
Hi all,
I have a Union All transformation with 4 inputs and one output when I debug the package the sum of the different inputs rows does not match the row count in output.
I don't understand, I've used the Union All transform many times and I've never seen this.
Any idea why this could happen ?
View 18 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2006
HI!
I am new in DB so I need some advices for finding the right solution.
I need to be able to make automatically any join between tables which the user choose and deliver the result.
is like making an hierarchy between all tables in DB (parent-child) and then making the select statement for the right join.
if u have any idea about how can I manage this, pls help me.
thanks a lot!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2008
I have an Interesting situation that I'm hoping some of you experts can help me with basically I have the following hierarchy:
Net Profit
.....Gross Profit
..........Revenue
..........Direct Costs
.....Indirect Expense
Now, I have another hierarchy - separate from the above - that I need to assimilate to the hierarchy above - Example:
Expenses
.....Node a
..........Child a (Indirect Expense Type)
.....Child b (Direct Cost type)
Net Sales Adjustments
.....Child a (Revenue type)
.....Child b (Revenue type)
Depending on the type, the top most node needs to be assigned to the appropriate node in the initial hierarcy, like this:
Net Profit
....Gross Profit
........Revenue
................Net Sales Adjustments
....................Child a (Revenue type)
....................Child b (Revenue type)
........Direct Costs
...........Expenses
.................Child b (Direct Cost type)
........Indirect Expense
............Expenses
.................Node a
.....................Child a (Indirect Expense Type)
Now, I've been able to figure out how to assign the top most node and leafs if all the children have the same type (using the expan stored proc listed in the books online), but my question is on this portion:
Expenses
.....Node a
...........Child a (Indirect Expense Type)
.....Child b (Direct Cost type)
Basically, the answer is to work backwards - if a child has a type that is different than the other children, a copy of the hierarch (up to the child) needs to be made and assigned to the appropriate initial node.
I've tried modifying the expand stored proc to give me the lineage of the child and see if there's a way I can copy the node and place it appropriately - I'm brainfried at this point, and I'm hoping that someone outthere can point me in the right direction.
Thanks in advance for your time
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2008
Hai everyone.,
i need to get solution for tree hierarchy in sql is there any solution or any keyword like 'connect by prior' in oracle ..
plz help me on this..
for example:
id | FName |parentid |
1 | sandy |
2 | robert| 1
if i give the parentid 1 in where condition of a query i need the details of 'sandy'
Thanks in Advance.
B.Arul.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2006
Hello!I have a table that looks like this:Col1; Col2; Col3; Col4; Col538; 75; 233; 916; 277038; 75; 233; 916; 277138; 75; 233; 916; 277238; 75; 233; 923; 265438; 75; 233; 923; 265538; 75; 245; 913; 245438; 75; 245; 913; 2456....And I need a query (not a procedure) that shows me this:38; NULL; NULL; NULL; NULLNULL; 75; NULL; NULL; NULLNULL; NULL; 233; NULL; NULLNULL; NULL; NULL; 916; NULLNULL; NULL; NULL; NULL; 2770NULL; NULL; NULL; NULL; 2771NULL; NULL; NULL; NULL; 2772NULL; NULL; NULL; 923; NULLNULL; NULL; NULL; NULL; 2654NULL; NULL; NULL; NULL; 2655NULL; NULL; 245; NULL; NULLNULL; NULL; NULL; 913; NULLNULL; NULL; NULL; NULL; 2454NULL; NULL; NULL; NULL; 2456....Does anybody know how i can get this result? How?Help! Thank you!SQLNullps: SQL-Server 2000
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2006
Hi to All!
Is there a perfect method to implement a hierarchy structure with different types as a table in Sql server 2005? Currently I am thinking of this way:
[Node | ParentId | ParentType | ChildId | ChildType]
But there is this nagging little voice saying it can be better
Cheers!
Nele
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2004
Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to write I SP on the following table that will produce the results show at the bottom. My main problem is the sorting, is there a way I loop through the records in TSQL and ORDER BY SortSort where the ParentID's are the same?
Thank you.
Table example
IDParentIDSortOrderCaption
1null1Main
211Files
313Folders
422File2
512Holders
621File1
752Holder2
851Holder1
Required result example
Main
-Files
--File1
--File2
-Holders
--Holder1
--Holder2
-Folders
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2008
Hi
i tried on CTE but iam not gettng correct result plz help me
Declare @TMaster Table (MasterId int, Type varchar(100), ParentMasterId int)
Insert into @Tmaster
Select 1, 'Fixed', 14 Union All
Select 2, 'Flexible',14 union All
Select 3, 'Others',14 union All
Select 13, 'Retirement benefits',1 union All
Select 14, 'PBHeads', 0
Select * From @Tmaster
Declare @TDetails Table ( MasterId Int, Description varchar(100))
Insert into @TDetails
Select 1, 'Basic' union all
Select 1,'Conveyance' union all
Select 1,'HRA' union all
Select 1,'Special Allowance' union all
Select 2, 'Children Education' union all
Select 2,'Travel Allowance' union all
Select 2,'Medical Expenses' union all
Select 2,'Variable Spl Pay' union all
Select 3, 'Project Allowance' union all
Select 3,'Quarterly Incentive' union all
Select 3,'Shift Allowance' union all
Select 3,'Annual Component' union all
Select 13,'Provident Fund' union all
Select 13,'Gratuity' union all
Select 13,'Super annuation'
Select * From @TDetails
in group list we have to show fixed, flexible, other
in subgroups(L1) list under fixed we have to show
Basic salary, HRA, Conveyance, Special Allowance,Retirement benefits
in subgroup(L2) we have to show Gratuity, providedfund, Super annuation they are subgroups of retirementbenefits
output :
Group Subgroup(L1) Subgroup(L2)
Fixed
Basic salary
HRA
Conveyance
Special Allowance
Retirement benefits
Provident Fund
Gratuity
Super annuation
Flexible reimbursements
LTA/Group Travel
Medical expenses
Children education
variable special pay
Others
Project allowance
Performance incentive
Medical insurance
View 12 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2007
Hi all,
Ive got a bit of a problem,
I have two tables:
CATEGORY
id
name
parent_CATEGORY_id
RECORD
id
CATEGORY_id
Stock_Held_Number
ps. Ive stripped out any non relevant fields
I also have the following query (again ive stripped out the non-relevant fields)
SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT SUM(dbo.RECORD.Stock_Held_Number) AS TotalStock, CATEGORY.Name AS FundName
FROM CATEGORY
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.RECORD ON CATEGORY.ID = dbo.RECORD.CATEGORY_id
GROUP BY CATEGORY.Name, RECORD.Stock_Held_Number
At the moment its grouping all the CATEGORIES and giving me a sum total for each which is great.
The problem I have is the CATEGORY table, there is an optional join to parent CATEGORY records on the table.
What Im trying to do is to provide a fully ordered result within the CATEGORIES and I don't have a clue.
For example:
The CATEGORY table has the following values
ID Name Parent_Category_id
1 Pens
2 Animals
3 Rocks
4 Horses 2
5 Dogs 2
When I currently run the query I get:
Name TotalStock
Pens 20
Animals 30
Rocks 40
Horses 50
Dogs 60
It's technically correct because I don't want the parent to calculate the total value of the children
What Im really trying to do is order them within the hierarchy though and indent (if possible) the result so I would get
Name TotalStock
Animals 30
---Dogs 60
---Horses 50
Pens 20
Rocks 40
Does anybody have any pointers as to how I can achieve this.
Many thanks
Mike
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2008
how do i create a parameter in hierarchy?
SAMPLE
billing period:
YEAR 2007
1st quarter
jan
feb
mar
2nd quarter
april
may
june
something like that.... if the user chose the 1st quarter the report will generate a sum-up report for the 1st quarter of 2007...
kindly reply asap.. i really need to get this report working..
thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2007
I have structure:FolderId, FolderName, ParentFolderId, FullPathe.g.1, First, null, First2, Sec, 1, First/Sec.....When update happens to FolderName, i need to update all FullPaths thatare below Folder which is changing.Any ideas?Thank you.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Greetings!I could really use some suggestions on how to improve on thefollowing, it at all possible:Table 'Customer'---------------------ID GUID PK....Table 'Facility'-----------------ID GUID PKCustomerID GUID FK (FK to Customer GUID)....Table 'Rate'----------------ID PKOwnerID GUID Nullable FK (FK to Customer, Facility GUID PK)OwnerLevel INT Contraint 1-3<Rate Data>Table 'Rate' is a sparse hierarchy of data. There are 3 possiblelevels in the hierarchy as follows:OwnerID <NULL>OwnerLevel 1This indicates Global rate data.OwnerID <Customer.ID>OwnerLevel 2This indicates Customer-specific rate data.OwnerID <Facility.ID>OwnerLevel 3This indicates Facility-specific rate data.Now, a given Customer need not have an entry in the Rate table. If aCustomer does not have an entry, it is supposed to 'inherit' Globalrate data. A given Facility need not have an entry in the Rate table.If a Facility does not have an entry, it is supposed to inheritCustomer-specific rate data, and in the absence of an entry for theFacility's parent Customer, it is supposed to inherit Global ratedata.The challenge is that I want to write a view to give me back theappropriate rate record for Customer and Facility. Here's what I'vedone so far.View _Rate--------------SELECTRate.*,NULL AS TargetIDFROMRateWHERERate.OwnerID IS NULLUNIONSELECTRate.*,Customer.ID AS TargetIDFROMRateCROSS JOINCustomerWHERERate.OwnerID IS NULLOR Rate.OwnerID = Customer.IDUNIONSELECTRate.*,Facility.ID AS TargetIDFROMRateCROSS JOINFacilityWHERERate.OwnerID IS NULLOR Rate.OwnerID IN (Facility.CustomerID, Facility.ID)View view_Rate--------------------SELECT_Rate.*FROM_RateINNER JOIN(SELECTTargetID,MAX(OwnerLevel) AS OwnerLevelFROM_RateGROUP BYTargetID) AS Filtered_RateON_Rate.TargetID = Filtered_Rate.TargetIDAND _Rate.OwnerLevel = Filtered_Rate.OwnerLevelThe combination of these two views gives a resultset that contains 1record for every Target ID as follows:TargetID <NULL>OwnerID <NULL>OwnerLevel 1This indicates Global rate data established at the Global level.TargetID <Customer.ID>OwnerID <NULL>OwnerLevel 1This indicates Customer rate data for the specific Customer identifiedby Customer.ID is inherited from the Global rate data.TargetID <Customer.ID>OwnerID <Customer.ID>OwnerLevel 2This indicates Customer-specific rate data for the specific Customeridentified by Customer.ID (not inherited).TargetID <Facility.ID>OwnerID <NULL>OwnerLevel 3This indicates Facility rate data is inherited from the Global ratedata.TargetID <Facility.ID>OwnerID <Customer.ID>OwnerLevel 2This indicates Facility rate data for the specific Facility identifiedby Facility.ID is inherited from the Facility's parent Customer'sCustomer-specific rate data.TargetID <Facility.ID>OwnerID <Facility.ID>OwnerLevel 3This indicates Facility-specific rate data for the specific Facilityidentified by Facility.ID (not inherited).I know this is a lengthy post, and a complicted query scenario, butI'm not willing to accept that my solution is the best solution justyet. Please consider that I really need this functionality in a VIEWas much as possible.Thank you for your learned consideration.I eagerly await your replies.Darryll
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2007
Hi everybody,
I've been reading the book MCITP Self-Paced Training Kit (Exam 70-441): Designing Database Solutions by Using Microsoft SQL Server(TM) 2005 (Self-Paced Training Kits) as a part of my preparation for exam 70-441
The book is really clear, and I could understand everything easily because I've some experience as a database developer.
Until now, there's only one thing that I didn't fully understand:
On pages 53 and 54, it mentions a type of hierarchy called: a graph hierarchy, and it gives a small example made the things even more complicated
I've many books about database design theories, but they don't use the term (graph hierarchy) any where...
So, I appreciate if you can point me to an online resource or a book that discusses this term thorougly.
Thank you
View 3 Replies
View Related
