I setup replication (merge) for a test db with 11 tables. Deleted the publication and want to delete the database itself. Sql server says it can't be deleted becuase it's has replication setup! Bug??
View 1 RepliesI had a publication (merge) setup for a database. Deleted the publication and tried to delete the database. Sql server says it can't be deleted because it's has replication setup. Bug??
i have a column name remarks and i want to retrieve data like by deleting some of the leading charaters and some last characters and show the middle one.
like remarks has CALLTRANSFER_OVER_SIP:XfrTime=86.05599975585938_en and i want to show only "XfrTime=86.05599975585938" this much
Thanks everyone for being helpful. I am new to SQL Server and don't have many coworkers so I am relying heavily on this forum's help.
It seems the previous poster on this issue was able to work it out but I am still not able to get it to work.
I have tried using the server URL, the server machine name, the ipaddress with alias, but still cannot connect with the replication over vpn. Any ideas?
Also, how can I set the subscriber from the server? How do I refer to the subscriber machine? Let's say it is my pc that I want to make changes in and have them replicate to the server? When I specify a pull subscription I am not show how to refer to my computer.
SQL2000 used to send a 2 part update using sp_msdel followed by sp_msins instead of just calling sp_msupd. I thought this used to happen on tables with compostie primary keys. Does any know know if this still occurs in SQL2005 and maybe why?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSQL 2012 Ent SP2
Database is in simple recovery mode, and published with transaction replication push subscription, just one subscriber but the database is huge. I don't want to overwrite the schema at the subscriber either.
I had to run an alter database command on a published database, it created so many logs that an extra drive had to be added along with an extra log file to accommodate all the logs.
The problem I have is I'd like to know clear the file of logs so I can drop the temporary log file, and give the drive back, but I cannot.
I have tried dbcc shrinkfile with the emptyfile option but it never clears, I have also tried it with notruncate and truncateonly options (mainly out of desperation).
I do not need to worry about point in time restore as a full backup is taken before and after the operation. After which the database will be put back into Full recovery mode.
I have looked at log_reuse_wait_desc and the file says 'Replication', so I am now thinking the file cannot empty because replication is keeping one of the VLFs active. I tried dropping and recreating the subscription hoping it might free something up and I could get somewhere, but it made no difference.
Do I have to remove replication completely to get round this? Surely not.
I have also tried putting the database back into full recovery mode, doing a full DB backup, and a transaction log backup, but its made no difference, which is also what makes me think a portion of the log is still active because of replication, and perhaps the transactions have not gone through to the subscriber, which raises another question, why not?
I have not tried restarting SQL server, as I'd like to know a way out of this without having to do that, plus I do not think it would make any difference anyway.
Hi there,
We're going to use replication on our database. There are tables without any primary key.
Is a primary key necessary for replication?
I have also antoher question: We want to replicate the whole OLTP database (size 30 GB).
Is snapshot replication a suitable mechanisme for this? I thougt snapshot replication overwrites all of the data, not only changed data. Or should we use another replication method?
Thanks in advance,
Patrick de Jong
I am about to apply DBCC DBREINDEX to a large database that is part of transactional replication and synchronised every 3 minutes. What are the likely implication and what precautions I must take.
Thanks in advance
Regards
R Suresh
I have SSRS 2005 SP2 configured to work in Sharepoint integration. Everything works fine except that I am not able to programmatically change any property of report viewer web part (instance) that I have added on on home page of my sharepoint site.
I can do same thing via sharepoint UI but not through program. When my programs runs it fetches all web parts been added on home page, then I need to iterate through each one and find report viewer web part.
While iterating, as soon as I arrive to report viewer web part it is named as "Error web part" with error message as
"Windows SharePoint Services cannot deserialize the Web Part. Check the format of the properties and try again"
If someone has a solution, please respond at your earlist.
Thanks
Shankar
I am looking into work-arounds for what seems to be a flaw, or"undocumented feature" of SQL Server replication and Instead of Deletetriggers not playing together. It seems that if you want to usereplication then you cannot use Instead Of triggers as it prohibits thereplication triggers from firing. My delima is that I need to cascadedelete, but first have the record and all child records inserted intoassociated delete tables (<tablename>_del). This worked well usingInstead of delete triggers, but now we are moving to a replicationenvironment and it does not synchronize deletes to the publisher orsubscriber.The options I am looking into and the stumbling points they introduceare:1. Not using Instead Of triggers, but using After to insert thedeleted record into a <tablename>_del table (where of course<tablename> is the actual table name). The triggers are designed tocascade delete all related child records. The problem with thisoption is that there are relationship constraints that cause thedelete to raise an error complaining about these constraints. Ofcourse the child records need to be deleted first, but since thisruns after the delete I cannot perform this cascade delete viatrigger (or can I?).2. Same as above only using SQL Server 2k's "Cascade Delete"option. My question on this is, will the cascade delete execute theAfter Delete triggers for each child table in the relationship? Ifnot, is there a way to move these deleted records into<tablename>_del before they are deleted, keeping in mind that itmust be compatible with merge replication.3. Not yet found any information on this, but is it possible tomanually include information to be replicated after the "Instead Of"triggers so that the changes are included in the replication?I really appreciate the advice.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a table with a column named measurement decimal(18,1). If the value is 2.0, I want the stored proc to return 2 but if the value is 2.5 I want the stored proc to return 2.5. So if the value after the decimal point is 0, I only want the stored proc to return the integer portion. Is there a sql function that I can use to determine what the fraction part of the decimal value is? In c#, I can use
dr["measurement "].ToString().Split(".".ToCharArray())[1] to see what the value after the decimal is.
I have made the following Scalar-valued function:
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[TimeCalc]
(
@OriginalTime AS INTEGER
, @TenthsOrHundredths AS INTEGER -- code 2: 1/10, code 4: 1/100
)
RETURNS NVARCHAR(8)
[Code] ....
What it does is convert numbers to times
E.g.: 81230 gets divided by 10 (times in seconds: 8123). This 1 1 full minute, and the remainder = 2123 making it 1.21.23 mins)
So far so good (function works perfectly)
My question: sometimes times are in 1/100 (like above sample), sometimes in 1/10.
This means that, e.g. with a time like 3.23.40 the last zero must be deleted.
My thoughts are to use the results from the Return Case part, and as the code = 4: leave it as it is,
is the code 2 the use LEFT(... result Return Case ..., Len(..result Return Case.. - 1))
There are 5 codes: 0 1 2 3 and 4
We use a SQL Server 2000 Publisher and 2 pull subscribers.
Unfortunately we have some data loss from time to time. Some
records are deleted during the replicaton process. Actually
there shouldn't be any conflicts because of the permissions
of the application, so we use standard conflict resolving that
is selected when a publication is created, no extra options.
Any Ideas about that? Is it possible to dissallow deletes for
replication?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!
When I try to drop the publication in this order:
exec sp_dropsubscription @publication = @publicName, @subscriber = @servName, @article = N'all'
exec sp_droppublication @publication = @publicName
I am getting the following error after dropping the publication
Msg 16943, Level 16, State 4, Procedure sp_MSrepl_changesubstatus, Line 1271
Could not complete cursor operation because the table schema changed after the cursor was declared.
Msg 16943, Level 16, State 4, Procedure sp_MSrepl_changesubstatus, Line 1271
Could not complete cursor operation because the table schema changed after the cursor was declared.
Could anyone give me a suggestion about how to avoid this error?
Thanks!
Hi All.
I have the folling replication issue:
BD1 ------------------------> BD0
Replicate with filter
BD2 ------------------------> BD0
Replicate with filter
BD3
Four data bases BD0,BD1,BD2,BD3
In BD1 y BD2 there are two merged publications subscribed continuous in BD0.
The publications are defined as insert only and allow changes in the subscriber. Everything works perfectly. The records replicate immediately. In BD0 you can insert and modify records, however when I attemept to delete a record I get the following message:
error:
You can't insert a row with a duplicate key in the object 'dbo.MSmerge_tombstone' with unique index 'uc1MSmerge_tombstone'
Note: This is a translation of the original error message in Spanish below.
No se puede insertar una fila de clave duplicada en el objeto
'dbo.MSmerge_tombstone' con índice único 'uc1MSmerge_tombstone'
Cheers,
I tried to drop a merge replication publication and it is giving me an invalid object name dbo.ms_mergeagents message. I tried to drop using:
SSMS
sp_dropmergepublication
sp_replicationdboption
I got the last two from Microsoft KB article 324401. The subscription was never created because it gave another error invalid object_name msmerge_subscriptions. I can create new publications but not drop the existing ones.
Please assist...
Hi,
I created and scheduled a test snapshot publication and a push subscription using the sql server replication wizard. Tested it and it worked all fine as the data was regularly replicated to the destination server correctly.
After I was satisfied with the test I deleted the replication and subscription without any problem. But I noticed that the jobs created by the replication wizard had not been deleted. I was disappointed as I had also expected these to be deleted because there are no more any local publication or replication on the server.
I, then, tried to delete the job by right click - and then delete. But I am unable to delete the pubilcation and subscription jobs at all. When I try to delete the sql server 2005 the following error message appears:
--start--------------------------------------------------------------------
"Attempt to retrieve data failed for object for server <MYSERVER>" (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo
)
Addional Information
The job <jobname> does not exist on the server. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
--End--------------------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone help me on how to delete all replication jobs.
Hi everybody,
when I look into the replication monitor of our sql 2005 server I see a lot of subscriptions that are no longer used.
I wrote a program for a smartphone using the sql compact edition (sql ce db). Just in case there are some problems i do not want to mentioned here, i use an preconfigured sql ce db, reinitialize it and afterwards synchronize it. Then the old subscription is no longer used.
The problem is that up to now I did find a way to delete this unused subscriptions at the publisher database. As a hint: there is no way to get access to the old sql ce db for removement issues. The dbs are gone.
So, is there a way to solve my problem?
We are using sql 2005 server as publisher and are using merge replication.
Thanks for help in advanced
Garfield
I am beginning design for a project to maintain an on-line archive of historical data for a production database, and then truncate old, rarely-used data from the production database. I am considering a method whereby we (A) replicate data changes from the production database to an archive database and (B) truncate old data from the production database according to predetermined business rules.
I am trying to determine whether SQL Server merge or transactional replication can be used to accomplish the replication portion of this requirement.
Given this scenario, there are two types of modifications that are made to the production database: (1) application inserts, deletes and updates which should be replicated, and (2) truncation deletes (as described in "B", above) which should not be replicated.
My question is: Will I be able to control the replication process such that application deletes are replicated, but "truncation" deletes are not? Could static row filters somehow be used to accomplish this?
In SQL Server 2005 SP1 we have a Transactional Replication with only this property in the articles:
Action: Delete data...
Ant this property in the publication:
Don't send schema changes
We have in the foreign keys NOT FOR REPLICATION = NO (Exigir para replicacion = "Si" in Spanish).
We have one problem and one doubt:
The problem is that when the sincronization goes wrong the table in the suscriptor is empty !!!!!. It seems that goes wrong because the foreign keys. The question is = Is necessary that NOT FOR REPLICATION = YES in all the tables?, we don't want any check in the sincronization.
Why the destiny tables appears empty?. Is very dangerous.
Thanks.
Hi,
Any updates on tables at publisher are being converted to Delete/Insert pair
at subscriber end with transactional replication. Our business requirement is not to delete data from few tables and also to get rid of Foreing Key
Constraint error.
How to avoid this Deletes during Update? Any ideas about writing custom stored procs?
Thanks
What different are there between connectionString (Part 1) and connectionString (Part 2) in web.config
The CCWW is my PC's name, normally I can connect to the database ASPNETDB.MDF correctly either Part 1 or Part 2 in a web page,After I open Database Explorer panel and browse ASPNETDB.MDF, I can't connect to database using Part 2 when I open a webpage in Microsoft Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition,but I can correctly open a webpage using Part 1 after I open Database Explorer panel.
What different are there between connectionString (Part 1) and connectionString (Part 2) in web.config?
I guess while I use Part 1 to connect, maybe it will be cancel exclusive method of the database ASPNETDB.MDF first, but when I connect to database using Part 2, maybe two programms both Part 2 and Database Explorer visit ASPNETDB.MDF at the same time!
--------------------------------------Part 1------------------------------------------------------------------------<add name="MyConnect" connectionString="Data Source=.SQLExpress;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|ASPNETDB.MDF" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> --------------------------------------Part 1------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Part 2------------------------------------------------------------------------<add name="MyConnect" connectionString="Data Source=CCWWSQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=ASPNETDB.MDF;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|ASPNETDB.MDF" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />--------------------------------------Part 2------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have some simple files but they are failing because the delete history task is failing as it is looking for files in a non existent directory.
It is looking for files in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.INSTANCEMSSQLLog whereas it should be looking in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLLog
how I can get this corrected so I can get the Maintenance Plans to run correctly.
I have tried deleting and recreating the Plan but to no avail
I am using Master Data Service for couple of months now. I can load, update, merge and soft delete data in MDS. Occasionally we even have to hard delete data from MDS. If we keep on soft deleting records in a MDS table eventually there will be huge number of soft deleted records. Is there an easy way to hard delete all the soft deleted records from all MDS tables in a specific Model.
View 18 Replies View RelatedHello:
Need some serious help with this one...
Background:
Am working on completing an ORM that can not only handles CRUD actions -- but that can also updates the structure of a table transparently when the class defs change. Reason for this is that I can't get the SQL scripts that would work for updating a software on SqlServer to be portable to other DBMS systems. Doing it by code, rather than SQL batch has a chance of making cross-platform, updateable, software...
Anyway, because it needs to be cross-DBMS capable, the constraints are that the system used must work for the lowest common denominator....ie, a 'recipe' of steps that will work on all DBMS's.
The Problem:
There might be simpler ways to do this with SqlServer (all ears :-) - just in case I can't make it cross platform right now) but, with simplistic DBMS's (SqlLite, etc) there is no way to ALTER table once formed: one has to COPY the Table to a new TMP name, adding a Column in the process, then delete the original, then rename the TMP to the original name.
This appears possible in SqlServer too --...as long as there are no CASCADE operations.
Truncate table doesn't seem to be the solution, nor drop, as they all seem to trigger a Cascade delete in the Foreign Table.
So -- please correct me if I am wrong here -- it appears that the operations would be
along the lines of:
a) Remove the Foreign Key references
b) Copy the table structure, and make a new temp table, adding the column
c) Copy the data over
d) Add the FK relations, that used to be in the first table, to the new table
e) Delete the original
f) Done?
The questions are:
a) How does one alter a table to REMOVE the Foreign Key References part, if it has no 'name'.
b) Anyone know of a good clean way to get, and save these constraints to reapply them to the new table. Hopefully with some cross platform ADO.NET solution? GetSchema etc appears to me to be very dbms dependant?
c) ANY and all tips on things I might run into later that I have not mentioned, are also greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Sky
I am having great difficulty with cascading deletes, delete triggers and referential integrity.
The database is in First Normal Form.
I have some tables that are child tables with two foreign keyes to two different parent tables, for example:
Table A
/
Table B Table C
/
Table D
So if I try to turn on cascading deletes for A/B, A/C, B/D and C/D relationships, I get an error that I cannot have cascading delete because it would create multiple cascade paths. I do understand why this is happening. If I delete a row in Table A, I want it to delete child rows in Table B and table C, and then child rows in table D as well. But if I delete a row in Table C, I want it to delete child rows in Table D, and if I delete a row in Table B, I want it to also delete child rows in Table D.
SQL sees this as cyclical, because if I delete a row in table A, both table B and table C would try to delete their child rows in table D.
Ok, so I thought, no biggie, I'll just use delete triggers. So I created delete triggers that will delete child rows in table B and table C when deleting a row in table A. Then I created triggers in both Table B and Table C that would delete child rows in Table D.
When I try to delete a row in table A, B or C, I get the error "Delete Statement Conflicted with COLUMN REFERENCE". This does not make sense to me, can anyone explain? I have a trigger in place that should be deleting the child rows before it attempts to delete the parent row...isn't that the whole point of delete triggers?????
This is an example of my delete trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER [DeleteA] ON A
FOR DELETE
AS
Delete from B where MeetingID = ID;
Delete from C where MeetingID = ID;
And then Table B and C both have delete triggers to delete child rows in table D. But it never gets to that point, none of the triggers execute because the above error happens first.
So if I then go into the relationships, and deselect the option for "Enforce relationship for INSERTs and UPDATEs" these triggers all work just fine. Only problem is that now I have no referential integrity and I can simply create unrestrained child rows that do not reference actual foreign keys in the parent table.
So the question is, how do I maintain referential integrity and also have the database delete child rows, keeping in mind that the cascading deletes will not work because of the multiple cascade paths (which are certainly required).
Hope this makes sense...
Thanks,
Josh
I'm trying to clean up a database design and I'm in a situation to where two tables need a FK but since it didn't exist before there are orphaned records.
Tables are:
Brokers and it's PK is BID
The 2nd table is Broker_Rates which also has a BID table.
I'm trying to figure out a t-sql statement that will parse through all the recrods in the Broker_Rates table and delete the record if there isn't a match for the BID record in the brokers table.
I know this isn't correct syntax but should hopefully clear up what I'm asking
DELETE FROM Broker_Rates
WHERE (Broker_Rates.BID <> Broker.BID)
Thanks
this is my Delete Query NO 1
alter table ZT_Master disable trigger All
Delete ZT_Master WHERE TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
alter table ZT_Master enable trigger All
I have troble in Delete Query No 2
here is a select statemnt , I need to delete them
select d.* from ZT_Master m, ZT_Detail d where (m.Prikey=d.MasterKey) And m.TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND m.TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
I tried modified it as below
delete d.* from ZT_Master m, ZT_Detail d where (m.Prikey=d.MasterKey) And m.TDateTime> = DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate())-(select Keepmonths from ZT_KeepMonths where id =1),0) AND m.TDateTime< DATEADD(month,DATEDIFF(month,0,getdate()),0)
but this doesn't works..
can you please help?
and can I combine these 2 SQL Query into one Sql Query? thank you
I'm using SqlDataSource and an Access database. Let's say I got two tables:user: userID, usernamemessage: userID, messagetextLet's say a user can register on my website, and leave several messages there. I have an admin page where I can select a user and delete all of his messages just by clicking one button.What would be the best (and easiest) way to make this?Here's my suggestion:I have made a "delete query" (with userID as parameter) in MS Access. It deletes all messages of a user when I type in the userID and click ok.Would it be possible to do this on my ASP.net page? If yes, what would the script look like?(yes, it is a newbie question)
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe requirement is: I should allow single row delete from a table but not bulk delete. An audit table should get updated if there is any single delete or single update. So I wrote the triggers as follows: for single and bulk delete
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[TRG_Delete_Bulk_tbl_attendance]
ON [dbo].[tbl_attendance]
AFTER DELETE
AS
[code]...
When I try to run the website, the database error I am getting is:Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 0, current count = 1.
I ran the following query in Query Analyzer on a machine running SQL Server 2000. I'm attempting to delete from a linked server running SQL Server 2005:
DELETE FROM sql2005.production.dbo.products
WHERE vendor='Foo'
AND productId NOT IN
(
SELECT productId FROM sql2000.staging.dbo.fooProductList
)
The status message (and @@ROWCOUNT) told me 8 rows were affected, but nothing was actually deleted; when I ran a SELECT with the same criteria as the DELETE, all 8 rows are still there. So, once more I tried the DELETE command. This time it told me 7 rows were affected; when I ran the SELECT again, 5 of the rows were still there. Finally, after running this exact same DELETE query 5 times, I was able to remove all 8 rows. Each time it would tell me that a different number of rows had been deleted, and in no case was that number accurate.
I've never seen anything like this before. Neither of the tables involved were undergoing any other changes. There's no replication going on, or anything else that should introduce any delays. And I run queries like this all day, involving every thinkable combination of 2000 and 2005 servers, that don't give me any trouble.
Does anyone have suggestions on what might cause this sort of behavior?
Hi,
I have a problem with one report on my server. A user has requested that I exclude him from receiving a timed email subscription to several reports. I was able to amend all the subscriptions except one. When I try to remove his email address from the subscription I receive this error:
An internal error occurred on the report server. See the error log for more details. (rsInternalError) Get Online Help
For more information about this error navigate to the report server on the local server machine, or enable remote errors
Online no help couldn't offer any advice at all, so I thought I'd just delete the subscription and recreate it again, but I receive the same message. "Okay, no problem, I'll just delete the report and redeploy it and set up the subscription so all the other users aren't affected", says I. "Oh, no!", says the report server, and then it give me this message:
System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Server was unable to process request. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Only members of sysadmin role are allowed to update or delete jobs owned by a different login. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, DbAsyncResult result) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(DbAsyncResult result, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.InstrumentedSqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.DBInterface.DeleteObject(String objectName) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.RSService._DeleteItem(String item) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.Library.RSService.ExecuteBatch(Guid batchId) at Microsoft.ReportingServices.WebServer.ReportingService2005.ExecuteBatch() --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
What's even weirder is that I'm the owner and creator of the report and I'm a system admin and content manager on the report server and I set up the subscription when the report was initially deployed. Surely I should have sufficient rights to fart around with this subscription/report as I see fit?
I have rebooted the server, redeployed the report, checked credentials on the data source and tried amending and deleting from both the report manager and management studio but still I am prevented from doing so.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Paul
First, this is not my code.
This one is weird and I am missing something fundamental on this one. A developer was getting a timeout with this...
CREATE PROCEDURE p_CM_DeleteBatch
(
@SubmitterTranID VARCHAR(50)
)
AS
DECLARE
@COUNT INT,
@COMMIT INT
SET @COUNT = 0
SET @COMMIT = 1 --DO NOT CHANGE THIS. The Operation will be commited only when this value is 1
select @COUNT = COUNT(*) from claimsreceived
where (claimstatus NOT IN ('Keyed', 'Imported')) AND
SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@COUNT = 0) --This means that that Claims under this Batch have not been adjudicated & it is safe to delete
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DELETE FROM INVOICECLAIMMAPPING WHERE CLMRECDID IN (SELECT DISTINCT CLMRECDID FROM CLAIMSRECEIVED WHERE SUBMITTERTRANID = @SUBMITTERTRANID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPayment WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPaymentServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsreceivedPayorServices where ClmRecdPyID in (SELECT ClmRecdPyID
FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors WHERE ClmRecdid in (SELECT ClmRecdID
FROM ClaimsReceived
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID)
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceived WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM BATCHLOGCLAIMS WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
IF (@COMMIT = 1)
BEGIN
--ROLLBACK TRANSACTION --For Testing Purpose ONLY
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN (0)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN (-1)
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
RaisError ('This Batch cannot be deleted. It has claim(s) which has been Adjudicated', 16, 1)
END
GO
I applied a couple of indices and got ride of the uncorrelated subqueries
CREATE PROCEDURE p_CM_DeleteBatch
(
@SubmitterTranID VARCHAR(50)
)
AS
DECLARE
@COUNT INT,
@COMMIT INT
SET @COUNT = 0
SET @COMMIT = 1 --DO NOT CHANGE THIS. The Operation will be commited only when this value is 1
select @COUNT = COUNT(*) from claimsreceived
where (claimstatus NOT IN ('Keyed', 'Imported')) AND
SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@COUNT = 0) --This means that that Claims under this Batch have not been adjudicated & it is safe to delete
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DELETE INVOICECLAIMMAPPING
FROM INVOICECLAIMMAPPING
JOIN CLAIMSRECEIVED
ON INVOICECLAIMMAPPING.CLMRECDID = CLAIMSRECEIVED.CLMRECDID
WHERE CLAIMSRECEIVED.SUBMITTERTRANID = @SUBMITTERTRANID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPayment
WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsPaymentServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE ClaimsreceivedPayorServices
FROM ClaimsreceivedPayorServices
JOIN ClaimsReceivedPayors
ON ClaimsreceivedPayorServices.ClmRecdPyID = ClaimsReceivedPayors.ClmRecPyID
WHERE ClaimsReceivedPayors.SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE ClaimsReceivedPayors
FROM ClaimsReceivedPayors
JOIN ClaimsReceived
ON ClaimsReceivedPayors.ClmRecdid = ClaimsReceived.ClmRecdid
WHERE ClaimsReceived.SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceivedServices WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM ClaimsReceived WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
DELETE FROM BATCHLOGCLAIMS WHERE SubmitterTranID = @SubmitterTranID
IF (@@ERROR <> 0)
SET @COMMIT = 0
IF (@COMMIT = 1)
BEGIN
--ROLLBACK TRANSACTION --For Testing Purpose ONLY
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN (0)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN (-1)
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
RaisError ('This Batch cannot be deleted. It has claim(s) which has been Adjudicated', 16, 1)
END
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
Suddenly this constraint was being violated with the change
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[ClaimsReceivedPayorServices] ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_ClaimsReceivedPayorServices_CLAIMSRECEIVEDPAYOR S] FOREIGN KEY
(
[ClmRecdPyID]
) REFERENCES [CLAIMSRECEIVEDPAYORS] (
[CLMRECPYID]
)
Is the delete on ClaimsReceivedPayors starting before the delete on ClaimsreceivedPayorServices finishes? If so why would it matter between the join and subquery? This one is making me depressed because I can not explain it.