Does anyone know how to change the number of conccurent connections on SQL Server 7. We have purchased 10 additional licenses and I need to change the concurrent users from 10 to 20. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks
If these are all used up, and a 26th connection comes in. What happens? is the connection rejected? or does it sit in a queue, waiting to be given a connection?
hi i hv developed an application that runs on the local windows system and interfaces with the MSSQL 7.0 database server using ODBC DSN Connections. This application will be deployed over the LAN with over 100 users.
The MSSQL 7.0 server has only 5 user licenses that limits the concurrent usage to 5 users.
I need a solution whereby all users can access the SQL server database without adding more licenses
I have been searching hi and low on the web to try and find out typically which version of sql server should be used based on the number of concurrent users you will be having.
I believe that Sql Server 2005 Express should only really be used for up to 10 concurrent users while I seem to remember that Standard edition supports up to approx. 33,000 connections.
Does anybody have this information to hand as I need to write a business case to justify the potential upgrade.
MSDE will only allow 5 concurrent connections to ...
a particular database? a particular instance? or a particular server?
ie. if i have one application running on one instance of MSDE with 5 connections and i have another application running on another instance of MSDE with 5 connections. would i actually have 10 connections? **both instances on the same machine...
Hi, I read that there's a "tecnical" limit of 32767 concurrent connections for SQL 2005 Express, and that SQL 2005 Express uses only 1GB of memory. So, what's the number of practical concurrent connections SQL 2005 Express can handle? Is it 200 ,300, 0r 400...? How much memory is consumed by every connection? Thanks in Advance.
Hi all !Does someone know how many concurrent connections 2005 Express canaccommodate ? The limit on MSDE was 5 before performance drops considerably.Thanks for your help.Sebastian
1. PhoneID is nothing but the participant in the call. PhoneID = 1 is twice from above. Which means 2 particpants (Same call )with 2 numbers with their callstarttime and callendtime. Similarly for PhoneID =2, there are 4 participants. And the list goes on for a day and then for a month.
2. For example a phone call P1 with 2 participants is going on for a particular day. We should not consider the same phone call having 2 participants involved. So that the concurrency would be 2. We have to ignore that here.
3. Only to be considered is other Phone calls for that day. Lets say P1 having call with 2 participants, P2 having some 4 participants which fall in the time period of P1. Then we should consider P1 and P2 the common period
4. In order to find number of concurrent calls happened for a day basing on callstarttime and callendtime. What would be the query?
5. Should consider the Timeperiod or the bucket with 1 hour as the period.
6. A Phone Call P1, Phone Call P2, should have matching (common) time ( keeping all the scenarios) is required for this query.
Result for Concurrent calls for a day should be like below. Should get all the concurrent connections happened for a particular day.
Date|TimePeriod/Bucket(hr part)|Concurrentconnections| Jan-01-2015|01 to 02|3 Jan-01-2015|11 to 12|2 Jan-02-2015|04 to 05|5 Jan-02-2015|12 to 13|13 ........
ii) So once the above is achieved.
Have to find the Maximum concurrent connections for day from the above.
For below Maximum Concurrent connections are '3' Date|TimePeriod/Bucket(hr part)|Concurrentconnections| Jan-01-2015|01 to 02|3 Jan-01-2015|11 to 12|2
Hence the Result for Maximum Concurrent Connections would be
Date|TimePeriod/Bucket(hr part)|MaxConcurrentconnections| Jan-01-2015|01 to 02|3 Jan-02-2015|12 to 13|13 .............
I have a DB that is currently not normalized and will be getting about 100K concurrent users that will mostly be doing Read-Only operations from multiple tables.
I am trying to figure out if I should start thinking of having a DB per client (1000 clients) or if I should normalize the database and keep it as a single DB with good indexes and partitioning.
Hardware is not a problem but 100K concurrent users is.
I know that if I set the Package.MaxConcurrentExecutables Property to -1, it will execute the maximum number of concurrent running executables to equal the number of processors plus two.
I have a requirement where I have to run the maximum number of concurrent running executables. However, the number of concurrent executables to run varies each month (it is not fixed).
If I have a loop inside the package that executes each stored procedure (same sproc, different parameter), will SQL Server execute the maximum number of concurrent running executables possible? (It may execute 4 or 8 at a time and that is fine.)
in my sql, i want to change a decimal number to percent format number, just so it is convenient for users. for example there is a decimal number 0.98, i want to change it to 98%, how can i complete it?
I would like to know does it exist a relation between number of licenses (per server) entered when installing SQL Server and the maximum of connections obtained by @@MAX_CONNECTIONS ? how can i get the information about the number of licenses after the installation ? Thanks.
I am building a package that involves copying 36 tables from an Access database into like tables in SQL 2000. Many of these tables require transformations and some require lookups. The number of records per table ranges from 4 to 4000. My question is, is it better to have a set of connections(one to Access and one to SQL for each table or one connection for all or some other approach.
hi, Does large number of connections to a sql server result in slogging queries?? by large number of connections I mean in the range of 2000 to 2500 connections to various databases on the same server. This happens on the production database, if I download the copy of the database and run the specific queries on the local box it hardly takes 1 second to execute, whereas on the production box it takes about 45 to 60 secs, i m working on the indexes part... was not sure whether number of connections to a server affect the performance of the queries or it is just that the indexes need defragmentation...
Hi. I have to buy a license for MS SQL Server 2000 and I need to know how many active connections I will need. I could try by running the application with multiple users and see how many connections there are.
The questions is: How can I know the number of active connections to the Server?
Is there any way to know the number of current connections to an SQL Server Database? Also how can one change the max pool size (for the number of connections allowed to the database)?
How do you find out the current number of connections to a SQL Server 2005 instance in SQL Server Managment Studio? I need to see if my number of connections is exceeding my Maximum Worker Threads.
Hi all, When I detach a SQL Server database, I see the following information: Connections using this database: 5 Where are the connections from ? How can I check ? Please help me ! Thanks
I am using SQL 6.5 and I would like to know (using Isql/w) the number of users connected to my server at any given time. Thanks for your help in advance.
I am new to SQL Server 7 and am not sure how to handle setting up/importing FoxPro databases. The consultants that setup the database before me have combined all of the FoxPro databases into one big database in SQL server. The reasoning was that for user applications to have access to different databases in SQL they would need a connection for each database they are using, so if all the data is put into one database then the user would only have one database connection instead of 6 or 7.
Does this make sense to anyone? Someone else thought that this might have been true is SQL Server 6.5 but not in SQL Server 7.0. Any help will be appreciated.
How to check number of active connections ? I know two ways of doing it ..
1. run sp_who2
2. in Current Activity in Enterprise Manager ..
If what ever number I am seeing is the Active Number of Connections ..then
I am facing a problem here ..
In My serevr I have 75 Users licenses are configured for Per server option .. Through a Java aplication when Developer tried to capture any SQL server Connection it says following error ..
Details : [MERANT][SQLServer JDBC Driver][SQLServer]Login failed. The maximum simultaneous user count of 75 licenses for this 'Standard Edition' server has been exceeded. Additional licenses should be obtained and installed or you should upgrade to a full version.
If I see from Sp_who2 and Current Activity , I can see only 37 Connections ...?
Why is so .. If I am having 75 configured and 37 live in sp_who2 ..why I am getting that error message ?
Is there other way to see Actual Number of Connections made to server ?
could somebody please let me know what is the maximum number of simultaneous users/connection per single SQL Server 7.0 box? Licenses are not the issue here, rather the number of physical connections supported before another server needs to be purchased.
Another variation of this question would be what's the highest number of databases that 7can be created on SQL 7.0 server and what is the highest number of physical connections supported per database? Again, licenses are not the issue. Thanks a lot in advance.