http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/compact/sscecomparison.mspx
The above link says the pros and cons of two SQL Server 2005 editions.
Document says Compact Edition is not good for €˜When you need a multi-user database server
€™.
What is the meaning of multi-user database?
Does this means the database strictly will not support two database connections at a time?
-Thank you,
Gish
I am using the code below to get all the children of a particular product and it is working fine. How to get the particular product's id in the select statement. for example, i need to show 891 in a separate column for all the records returned by the query below.
DECLARE @Hierarchy TABLE (Product_Id INT, Parent_Product_Id INT) INSERT INTO @Hierarchy VALUES (123, 234) INSERT INTO @Hierarchy VALUES (234, 456) INSERT INTO @Hierarchy VALUES (456, 678) INSERT INTO @Hierarchy VALUES (678, 891) INSERT INTO @Hierarchy VALUES (891, NULL)
Hi friends, How r u?..i have one clarification..Curently, i am doing one search engine stuff...for that, i have to populate data from sql server database to flat file..i got java script search engine code from one web-site,in that code,data's are fetching from flat-file only..so i have populate the data from sql server to flat-file, and then get the key-word value from that flat-file according to the user input..Is it possible?..send mail..
I just finished getting a local database mirrored to an offsite "DR" server. Interesting experience getting that working, but that's another story! It's set up as "High Safety without automatic failover (synchronous) (without a witness). I was hoping I could get a sanity check in this flow....
Local database gets updated each morning with a few meg of data, so it's pretty low use. It's mirrored through a T1 (soon to be dual). My remove copy was restored from yesterday€™s backup, and the mirror was sync'd in less than 10 minutes, so I don't expect bandwidth to be an issue...
In the event that my local server or network is down, I'd be able to log into my remote server, and run my application remotely. From what I've seen, the "Failover" option is only available on the "Primary" server? Will this become an option if the remote no longer sees the primary, or do I need to do this through the command: ALTER DATABASE <dbname> SET PARTNER FORCE_SERVICE_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS?
Since the updates are so limited, I'm not too concerned with data loss, but will need to make sure I can get this running quickly if needed...
As I understand it, this will put the mirrored database as the primary, and when the old primary comes back only, it'll become the new mirror? I can then let them sync, and force a failover from the remote system to put the primary back to the local network.
I just want to make sure I understand this correctly before I start testing. Thanks for any assistance!
I want to create a DataList that shows products, which will be on multiple pages. I have my stored proc to show paged results, which contains a return value for more records. I have found examples of coding the DataReader, defining all the parameters etc, but what about the drag and drop SqlDataSource?? You can select the DataSource Mode to be "DataReader". I can put select parameters in, with input and my return value. I don't know how to then access the return value, or output value if needed, from this? My DataList references the SqlDataSource, but I don't know how to get the return/output value out??? This is very frustrating, cause I can't find any info about it anywhere. Always input parameters, but no output. This is my current SqlDataSource...
If I take out the RETURN_VALUE Parameter, my results display in my data list, but that's useless if I can't access the return value to determine the remaining number of pages etc. Is my RETURN_VALUE parameter wrong? How do I access that? My stored proc is shown below...
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_PagedItems ( @Page int, @RecsPerPage int, @CategoryID int ) AS
-- We don't want to return the # of rows inserted -- into our temporary table, so turn NOCOUNT ON SET NOCOUNT ON
--Create a temporary table CREATE TABLE #TempItems ( ID int IDENTITY, No varchar(100), Name varchar(100), SDescription varchar(500), Size varchar(10), ImageURL varchar(100) )
-- Insert the rows from tblItems into the temp. table INSERT INTO #TempItems (No, Name, SDescription, Size, ImageURL) SELECT No, Name, SDescription, Size, ImageURL FROM Products WHERE CategoryID=@CategoryID
-- Find out the first and last record we want DECLARE @FirstRec int, @LastRec int SELECT @FirstRec = (@Page - 1) * @RecsPerPage SELECT @LastRec = (@Page * @RecsPerPage + 1)
-- Now, return the set of paged records, plus, an indiciation of we -- have more records or not! SELECT *, MoreRecords = ( SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TempItems TI WHERE TI.ID >= @LastRec ) FROM #TempItems WHERE ID > @FirstRec AND ID < @LastRec
mine is a small organisation and we have deployed an ERP on windows 2003 server. their are total 60 ERP users and we have 25 concurrent licences for ERP.
at the backend we are running MS SQL 2000 standard edition. we have created one user in Database and ERP accesses data through this user only.
now i need to understand how many CAL for database i need to purchase. either 60 or 25 or 1.
I hope someone can help here. I found that I was having replication failing due to the fact that there is a foreign key being referrenced, here is the error: Could not drop object 'dbo.tblName' because it is referenced by a FOREIGN KEY constraint. (Source: Database Name (Data source); Error number: 3726)
In searching for some sort of answer - I came across this: Join Filters
Foreign key relationships are central to most database designs. For example, in a database that tracks product orders, you often see a CUSTOMER table with a CustID primary key and an ORDER table with a CustID foreign key that references the CUSTOMER table. In merge replication, if you filter the CUSTOMER table with a subset filter clause, you must also filter the ORDER table, so that only the rows that reference the filtered subset of rows from the CUSTOMER table are replicated. Filtering requirements that are based on a foreign key relationship must be explicitly represented in the merge replication configuration through a join filter (which lists the two related table articles and a logical expression that identifies the relationship), as shown in the following example:CUSTOMER.CustID = ORDER.CustIDThe effect of this join filter between the CUSTOMER table and the ORDER table, together with the subset filter clause on the CUSTOMER table, is that Subscribers to the publication receive only those rows from the CUSTOMER table where State = 'WA' and only those rows from the ORDER table that correspond to the CustID values in the filtered CUSTOMER table. ________________________________________________________________________ Am I reading this right? If I have only one table that I need to replicate, I would need to included the other tables connected by the foreign key for the replication to work, and in doing so - the table I designate for updating in this replication will be the only one affected and the others that have go with this - won't update their corresponding dupe tables? Sorry - I hope this makes sense.
I have a question , because I€™m not very experienced with VB.
The function declares
Public myString Public myKey
When something is declared this way, what happens if two or more users happen to execute the report at the same time? Is myString and myKey public to all of those reports at the same time, or does the Report Server manage those variables separately for each of the reports running concurrently?
My goal is to populate a dropdownlist with only with users that are "Techs". I am using the membership database that you ccan set up through VWD. I added this column to the aspnet_Users table: IsTech as bit datatype. I thought I had the right SQL statement but apparently not, because I get an Invalid column name 'True'.Here is my statement: <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource3" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:HRIServiceConnectionString1 %>" SelectCommand="SELECT [UserID], [FirstName]+ ' ' + [LastName] AS techid FROM [aspnet_Users] WHERE [isTech] = True ORDER BY [LastName], [FirstName]"> </asp:SqlDataSource>
I am working on a SQL Server database that will be accessed (mainly) via a web interface that will have users from various countries. As I understand it, the best way to store data is to use 'n' (nvarchar etc) datatypes for columns, which allow users to enter data and it will be stored in the raw Unicode format. For other reasons the collation of the db has been changed (to Slovenian) but I understand that this will only affect how data is sorted. However, whenever I try to put certain data into the nvarchar field (Such as the £ symbol) the data get transferred to a letter L. Is that how it would be expected to work and if so am I missing something here - note I Know ent manager sometimes shows data incorrectly, but this happens when I add/view data from anywhere (i.e. end manager/ the website/ query analyser).
Hi, I'm seeing confusing results coming back from a query and I want to make sure my joins are working as expected.
I have 3 tables, tbl_family, tbl_familyPhone, and tbl_phone. tbl_FamilyPhone is a linking table between families and phones that specifies if it's the primary number.
So a family has many familyPhones and a phone has many family phones. I'm trying to get all the families and their home phone only, if they have one. I don't want families to duplicate and I don't want any left out. Here's what I've got
Code Snippet select [whatever]
from tbl_family LEFT OUTER JOIN tbl_familyphone on tbl_family.pk_familyid = tbl_Familyphone.fk_familyid inner JOIN tbl_phone on tbl_familyphone.fk_phoneID = tbl_phone.pk_phoneid and tbl_phone.fk_phonetypeid = 'E6F1688E-015B-481D-8C41-DCC1FEA5D5AB'
My thinking is the inner join between tbl_Phone and tbl_FamilyPhone will cause any FamilyPhone record without a phone record to be left out (fk_phonetypeid is the id of a home phone). Though some FamilyPhone records may be left out, I will not lose any families because it is left outer joined to familyphone. Is this right? Because if I just do select count(*) from families I get 4517 records, but when running the query above with the joins, I get 4383 records.
Does the Table Lock option in the OLE DB Destination task in a data flow refer to a lock on the destination table or on the source table from which the table is loading from?
The reason I ask is because I have a package run twice simultaneously pulling from the same server and table onto two different tables on two different servers. When I kick off my job to run the two data pulls, one of the jobs terminates with a
"TCP Provider: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host." message. I believe this is due to a table lock on the server, but can't figure this out.
- Windows 2008R2 SP2 VM (VMware 6) - SQL 2012 SP2 Std. - NetApp iSCSI LUNs, Snapmanager for SQL
So I have created a test database and configured the logs to grow to max. 120MB in size.
To check the allocated and free space I right-clicked the database -> tasks -> shrink file
I see currently allocated: 5,00MB and 2,50MB free space for the MDF Database I see currently allocated: 1,00MB and 0,63MB free space for the LDF Logfile
Next I use a data generator to fill the database with random data.
After adding around 500k rows I check the size again:
I see currently allocated: 17,00MB and 0,44MB free space for the MDF Database I see currently allocated: 61,94MB and 0,27MB free space for the LDF Logfile
Next I take a full backup incl. truncating log files. After that I check the size again:
I see currently allocated:Â 17,00MB and 0,44MB free space for the MDF Database I see currently allocated: 61,94MB and 57,24MB free space for the LDF Logfile
So now my question is where are those 56,97MB? I imagined they should now be added to the MDF file but they seem to be just gone. I did this procedure 2x more time and the MDF stays the same size while the LDF is almost empty after backups. Then I thought maybe its in the memory of the server so I rebooted it. But still the MDF has the same size... Is this normal? How it should work?
From BOL, I see these remarks with respect to the MODIFY FILE subcommand (my underline added):
Initializing Files By default, data and log files are initialized by filling the files with zeros when you perform one of the following operations:
Create a database
Add files to an existing database
Increase the size of an existing file
Restore a database or filegroup
Which leads me to believe that expanding the size of a datafile will also wipe out (my definition of 'initialize') any existing data within that file.
I may be misunderstanding 'initialize', because when I tested it out, I found this wasn't the case - my table data written to the file was still there after a resize.
Need to clarify to what degree I'd be taking a risk by increasing the file size on a datafile which already has data in it.
We're upgrading our SQL Server database from 2005 to 2012.I ran the Upgrade Advisory report and got this issue "Non-integer constants are not allowed in the ORDER BY clause in 90" because of the script below
SELECT gp.BRAND+' <> '+gp.CATEGORY AS 'full name', gp.PRODCODE, gp.CATEGORY FROM dbo.GFK_PRODUCT gp ORDER BY 'full name'
I tried running the same query in our test SQL Server 2012 and it ran successfully. Now I'm confuse if i still need to change it.I google the issue a bit and came across this link and mentioned this.
1.) Non-integer constants are ... constants that are not integer number.
Example:Â 'string1'Â represents a string constant 0x01Â represents a varbinary constant {ts '2015-02-26 06:00:00'}Â represents a datetime constant
1.23Â represents a numeric constants
2) So single quotes are used to define a string constants / character string constants but SQL Server allows also to use single quotation marks use also as column identifier delimiter: SELECT ... expression AS 'Column1' FROM ...
In this context is clear that 'Column1' is a column identifier but when used in ORDER BY : ORDER BY 'Column1' it generates confusion because SQL Server doesn't knows if it represents a string literal (character string constant) or it represents a column identifier / column name."Do I still need to change the existing code even though it's working fine in 2012? If yes, it is because of best practice reason or it will total get deprecated/not working in the future version?
Hi, How do I determine what the next "id" will be in a collumn where the Identity Specification is turned on with Identity Increment? I have two tables, the one contains product information and the other is a photo album. When I create a new product, then I automatically create an associated photo album. It all works fine, but I have found some problems after using this setup for a while to manage products. For example, say I have created 10 products (id's 1 to 10) , and then I decide to remove the last 5 products from the list. The next time I add a new product, it will be product number 6, but the id will be 11 (seeing that the id's will always be unique). How do I determine what the next Identity value will be seeing that the actual last id might not be the last one that was allocated? RegardsJan
I am not very clear about the use of 'identity specification properties'. There does not seem to be a great use of identity increments and seeds, it seems something that saves manual work, but to a very little extent Anyone willing to shed some light?
Hi: I'm trying to connect to a data base of "sql server 2005 enterprise" named BCR.The server name is "server1"I'm using Windows Authentication to connect to serverThe operating system is Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1 When I run the aspx I get this error at line 21 System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException: Invalid authorization specification Invalid connection string attribute at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection.ProcessResults(Int32 hr) at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection.InitializeProvider() at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection.Open() at ASP.pruebaLeeSqlServer_aspx.__Render__control1(HtmlTextWriter __output, Control parameterContainer) in Z:DigitalpruebaLeeSqlServer.aspx:line 21 This is my code: Dim str2 As String = "Provider=SQLNCLI; Server = server1; Database = BCR"Dim cnn2 As OleDbConnection = New OleDbConnection(str2)Dim cmd2 As New OleDbCommand()Dim drd2 As OleDbDataReaderTry cnn2.Open() cmd2.Connection = cnn2''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''line 21 cmd2.CommandText ="SELECT LastName FROM Employees" drd2 = cmd2.ExecuteReader Do While drd2.Read %> <%=drd2.GetString(0)%><br> <% Loop drd2.Close()Catch exc1 As Exception %> <%=exc1.ToString()%> <%Finally cnn2.Close() End Try What could be wrong?Do I need enable permission for asp.net in sql server?how I can do it? Thanks!!
I have a web application (ISAPI) that accesses a SQL Server 2000 (sp3) database in the same machine as the Web Server (IIS 6). Windows 2003 Standard Edition is the operating System. So, when users access the aplication through the web it runs ok until display the error message "Invalid authorization specification" or, sometimes, another message about failure to inform ODBC DSN, although I dont use ODBC.
When the error occurs, the user press F5 in the browser and the operation goes ok. It's an intermitent and curious error.
I have to try and get my head around this question and ive never seen sql this advanced before.please set me in the right direction.thanks in advance.Using the meeting table schema below provide a SQL statement to create a view in Microsoft SQL Server that will return only 1 record displaying the contents of the MEETING_NUMBER field. The rules for the view are as follows:• The START_DATE field which contains the start date of the meeting record must contain a value before the current system date.• The START_DATE field must be the closest date to the current system date.ID int (4)DOC_CLASS varchar (30)DOC_NUMBER int (4)REVISION int (4)START_DATE datetime (8)FINISH_DATE datetime (8)MEET_TIME varchar (5)VENUE varchar (50)TYPE varchar (50)MEETING_NUMBER varchar (11)CUTOFF_PERIOD int (4)CUTOFF_TIME varchar (5)AGENDA_STATUS varchar (50)SUBJECT varchar (50)SPONSORING_MIN varchar (50)SUPP_AGENDA_STATUS varchar (50)Possible answer:select meeting_numberfrom meetingwhere start_date < getdate()order by start_date desc
I have a question about Computed Column Specification which you can specify as a formula for each column inside a table.
I have now columns named Age and Class.
Classes are "Kids" (ID #1) , "Junior" (ID #2) and "Senior" (ID #3) Kids, which is for age of 6 till 12 Junior, which is for 12 till 16 Senior, 16 and above.
I have already searched for hours (I really did) on the internet for a solution, but ended with more questions because of the complicated solutions.
Now the Age is shown as a result of a formule of DOB (Date of Birth column), now I want the exact same thing, but the age must specify which Class the user is in.
Example, when I add a user with the birthdate 25/03/1988 (DD/MM/YYYY) he/she gets 24 as age.
With this formula : (datediff(year,[age],getdate()))
Now I want that the user gets "Senior" as Class (same table).
Senior is ID 3 in this case.
Now I do know how Case, When and Then works, but the validation fails. After reading some forums I understood that I should use a create function method. I am not really experienced with creating functions. Also the coding looks more different as I am used to. How to link the Computed Column to a created formula.
I'm trying to connect to a data base of "sql server 2005 enterprise" named BCR. The server name is "server1" I'm using Windows Authentication to connect to server The operating system is Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1
When I run the aspx I get this error at line 21
--------------------------------------------------------------- System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException: Invalid authorization specification Invalid connection string attribute at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection.ProcessResults(Int32 hr) at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection.InitializeProvider() at System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection.Open() at ASP.pruebaLeeSqlServer_aspx.__Render__control1(HtmlTextWriter __output, Control parameterContainer) in Z:DigitalpruebaLeeSqlServer.aspx:line 21
------------------------------------------------------------------ Dim str2 As String = "Provider=SQLNCLI; Server = server1; Database = BCR" Dim cnn2 As OleDbConnection = New OleDbConnection(str2) Dim cmd2 As New OleDbCommand() Dim drd2 As OleDbDataReader Try cnn2.Open() cmd2.Connection = cnn2''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''line 21 cmd2.CommandText ="SELECT LastName FROM Employees" drd2 = cmd2.ExecuteReader Do While drd2.Read %> <%=drd2.GetString(0)%><br> <% Loop drd2.Close() Catch exc1 As Exception %> <%=exc1.ToString()%> <% Finally cnn2.Close() End Try ------------------------------------------------------------------
What could be wrong? Do I need enable permission for asp.net in sql server? how I can do it?
Hello,I want to assign a column a computed value, which is the multiplicationof a value from the table within and a value from another table.How can I do that?Say the current table is A, column1; and the other table is B, column3.What should I write as formula?I tried someting like;column1 * (SELECT column3 FROM B WHERE A.ID = B.ID)but it didn't work.
We are testing our product on Windows Vista with SQL Server 2005 SP2 and are encountering an "invalid authorization specification". We make the connection through a Windows service using a standard ADO connection. I have tried changing the provider in the connection string to SQLNCLI without any success. The application is written in Delphi 5 and has worked on previous versions of Windows running SQL Server 2005.
what happens when a column marked as Identity Specification reaches the limit? for example, I have some code tables using tinyints as keys, the actual number of entries will be 20 or so but there is some volatility, so eventually the 255 limit will be reached, what happens then?
the same thing applies to ints or bigints used as keys, eventually the database must run out of numbers
I want to use an if statement to compute the value of a column in SQL Database using other columns. I am supposed to check if a column is null or not and do the computations accordingly. Can anyone help?
I'm trying to build a connection string to SQL Server 7.0 from ASP.net w/ C#
I get the following error: Format of the initialization string does not conform to the OLE DB specification. Starting around char[100] in the connection string.
What the heck does this mean? What am I doing wrong.. My connection string is below:
I'm getteing an error saying "[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Invalid character value for cast specification" when i try to debug a store procedure. The Store Procedure parameters are as below. PROCEDURE clCreateUnpostedTrxEarnType ( @SERIES int, @PERIODID int, @YEAR int, @PTRATIO float, @CPTYPE int, @CPTRXTYPE int, @Startdate datetime, @Enddate datetime, @O_iErrorState int = NULL output )
I am using the backend SQLServer with Powerbuilder, I write a stored procedure and tried to create a datawindow to use that procedure but failed, it returns error code 22005 -Invalid Character value for cast specification. I tried to change any setting in ODBC but still failed.
accessing through ODBC a frond end application which is running on MS SQL Server 2005, works just fine with a specific setup as concerned as the decimal/thousands separators ("," for thousands and "." for decimals). If i switch these settings alternatively ("." for thousands and "," for decimals), i get this error: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Invalid character value for cast specification.
I tried to search forum and internet but no luck. Thanks in advance