Closing A Conversation Later On And Microsoft Service Broker Interface (sample)
Oct 24, 2006
In a messaging application, a client sends a message to the server. The server uses Service Broker Interface, and is CLR based. On the server, the message has a life cycle - going throughout multiple transitions until is final (Pending, In Transit, Delivered, TimedOut, Undeliverable). As the server receives the message, it sends back to the client a reply status message of In Transit. It does so using the same message€™s conversation. It also saves €“ along with the message €“ its conversation handle. The dialog is not closed. After a while, the server may decide that the message has gotten to a final state (Delivered or TimedOut). I would like at that time to send a reply status message (Final State) back to the client and also close the conversation. The conversation handle has been saved by both, client and server. Having the conversation handle available - how do I get back to the client later on?
Thanks,
I am new to service broker and would like a little help please. I have a SP which gathers information from a collection of tables. Depending on the data gathered it may or may not begin a dialog conversation with a service broker queue. What i'm needing to know is should at the end of the SP once the required message has been sent should i end the conversation or not?
I've got a situation where I want to put request message on a queue. Because starting a conversation is the only way to put messages on a queue I have to start a conversation with myself. So my Begin Dialog Statement looks something like this:
DECLARE @conversation_handle UNIQUEIDENTIFIER;
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
FROM SERVICE [ServiceName1]
TO SERVICE 'ServiceName1'
ON CONTRACT [ContractName1]
WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF;
SELECT @conversation_handle AS ConversationHandle
I haven't noticed any problems with doing this but I wanted to know if there was anything wrong with it. Does someone know what problems this might cause?
when ever I send my message thru Service Broker I am getting an error message like this "
"Dialog security is not available for this conversation because there is no remote service binding for the target service. Create a remote service binding, or specify ENCRYPTION = OFF in the BEGIN DIALOG statement."
I'm working with the April CTP of SQL Server and I'm trying to create a proof of concept using service broker. I'm struggling with the "abc's" of it. If anyone has or can point me to a distributed "Hello, World" for service broker between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Express instances it would save me some time and trouble.
How to prevent the hang on the initator service broker if the target service broker is not started?
Our case has two service brokers (two databases), sometime, the target is need to turn off. But the sitation is the initator service broker (in fact, the message is sent from triggers) become hang, I want to prevent this case and continue to operation, and the messages should queue and will continue to send to target service broker when it startup. How should I do?
I have a problem with a server broker conversation between two instances on the same machine.
I have used Server Listning Manager to setup the communication between the instances.
When i a try to send a dialog it stops in sys.transmissin_queue and transmission_status is "The Service Broker protocol transport cannot listen on port 4022 because it is in use by another process."
Hello, I receive this error "The SQL Server Service Broker for the current database is not enabled, and as a result query notifications are not supported. Please enable the Service Broker for this database if you wish to use notifications." I attach the database in Management Studio to query and enable the broker using the scrip below but to no avail. ALTER DATABASE DataName SET ENABLE_BROKER ‘''<<------successfulandSELECT is_broker_enabled FROM sys.databases WHERE name = 'Database name' ‘'''<<-------value is 1 Global.asax ... Sub Application_Start(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDependency.Start(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("dataConnectionString1").ConnectionString) End Sub...Web.config ... <connectionStrings> <add name="dataConnectionString1" connectionString="Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|jbp_data.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> <add name="ASPNETDBConnectionString" connectionString="Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|ASPNETDB.MDF;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> </connectionStrings>... Hope you could help. cheers,imperialx
I have a initiator and a target service broker peer.
Both are controlled by a C# unit test. The initiator uses the Microsoft.Samples.SqlServer class. The target service uses stored procedure activation.
Sending a message from the initiator to the target, saves the content of the message, along with its conversation handle in the target's database specific table.
The unit test needs - at a later time - to instruct the target to send a message back on the same conversation handle to the initiator service.
For this the C# unit test creates a Conversation off of the saved conversation handle:
Service client = new Service("cleintservicename", conn, tran);
Conversation dialog = null;
dialog = new Conversation(client, convHandle); Sending the message on this dialog generates an error "Message body: <Error xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/Error"><Code>-8495</Code><Description>The conversation has already been acknowledged by another instance of this service.</Description></Error>". Is the error due to the fact that a service - using the activated stored procedure already picked up the conversation, so that a new reference to the service can not be created through the Service class in CLR? If so, I might need then to skip the activated stored procedure in favor or a CLR service, alltogether? Any help - greatly appreciated.
I'm in a SSIS Package Design tab working on a data flow. It was working fine up to now, but all of a sudden I keep getting this error that says, "Microsoft Visual Studio has encountered a problem and needs to close." And it has that "Send Error Report" and "Don't Send" button at the bottom. This started happening when I tried to add a Data Viewer on a Data Flow Path. And now every time I do this to try to debug my data flow, it gives me this message and closes my project.
However, the package executes without any package errors, but I as I described above, I can't add a Data Viewer because it keeps giving me this message and closing my package.
I am struggling with the position SSB could take in an SOA. If I would want a broker in the general sense, meaning an intermediary sitting between applications which exchange information through messaging, would SSB be a good candidate? I know Biztalk is probably the primary candidate, but in my scenario I would end up with Biztalk apps with empty orchestrations. Also, I think Biztalk is more expensive to manage. So I am looking for a lightweight broker for a simple SOA targeted at application interoperability, no fancy business processes in sight.
I am trying to send a message between to SQL Server 2005 instances on two different machines. I have checked all my routes and all my objects appear to be setup correctly. However, when running Profiler on the target machine, I receive the "This message has been dropped because the TO service could not be found. Service name: "[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]". Message origin: "Transport". This is my activated stored procedure that is sending the message to the target service. I am using certificate security. Any help appreciated....
CREATE PROCEDURE [usp_ProcessMessage]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @conversation_handle uniqueidentifier
DECLARE @message_body AS VARBINARY(MAX)
WHILE (1=1)
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
WAITFOR(RECEIVE TOP (1)
@conversation_handle = conversation_handle,
@message_body = message_body
FROM [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyQueue]
), TIMEOUT 1000;
IF (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
BEGIN
COMMIT;
BREAK;
END
END CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
IF @message_body IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
FROM SERVICE [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyService]
TO SERVICE '[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]'
ON CONTRACT [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyMessage/v1.0]
WITH ENCRYPTION = ON, LIFETIME = 600;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
MESSAGE TYPE [tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/VisitMessage]
(@message_body);
END
COMMIT;
END
END
GO
My endpoints are created like so:
CREATE ENDPOINT MyEndpoint
STATE = STARTED
AS TCP
(
LISTENER_PORT = 4022
)
FOR SERVICE_BROKER (AUTHENTICATION = CERTIFICATE MasterCertificate)
GO
GRANT CONNECT TO CertOwner
GRANT CONNECT ON ENDPOINT::MyEndpoint TO CertOwner
GO
And my routes like so:
GRANT SEND ON SERVICE::[tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyService] TO CertOwner
GO
CREATE REMOTE SERVICE BINDING [MyCertificateBinding]
TO SERVICE '[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]'
I am using SQL 2000 running a couple of large (up to 70GB) databases. I am currently backing up to disk, which is working fine. I now want to backup the databases using the Snapshot feature of my storage array. To do this however, I first need to put my databases (3 of them) into 'backup mode', so as to stop transactions being written to the database, and provide a consistent database to backup. Has anyone had any experience with this feature? Microsoft provide a sample C++ program called snaphot.cpp that puts a single database into 'backup mode'. I am not particularly clued up on C++. Can multiple databases be put into this mode simultaneously? Is this particularly difficult to do? Any help would be greatly appreciated
I am doing some research to see if the Service Broker technology would help my company with our Enterprise application. Here is our scenario: We have a 3 tier system. The first tier needs to contact the second tier asynchronously. Hence, using queues is a good option. However, the process that needs to happen on the second tier is mostly process intensive with little database updates. Is it still worth our time to use Service Broker?
I like the concept of Activation that Service Broker provides. But, from what I am reading most of the documentation describes activation as a way to call another stored proc. I definitely dont' want to do any process intensive work on the SQL server. So here comes my question...
How would I use a windows service to listen to the activation event from the Service Broker. I could have multiple windows services watching the same queue (scalable). Would I have to handle collisions myself? If so, I think I would rather keep it simple, and just use a simple table as my queue.
hi allin the sample of sqlserver2005(notification service(stock))this is code sample in :appADF.xml(stock) -------------------------- -- Update value in the chronicle if event price greater than value in the chronicle UPDATE StockEventsChron SET StockPrice = E.StockPrice FROM StockEvents E, StockEventsChron C WHERE E.StockSymbol = C.StockSymbol AND E.StockPrice > C.StockPrice.for scenario: + the first SubscriberId(Stephanie) set :StockTriggerValue=20, and stockPrice changge =50 -> one notification for Stephanie and in the table StockEventsChron the value field :StockPrice = 50, + the next : stockPrice changge = 25. the field value StockPrice of table StockEventsChron is still 50 + then second SubscriberId(Scott) set StockTriggerValue=30 but---------------- Insert Into StockNotifications ( S.SubscriberId, S.DeviceName, S.SubscriberLocale, E.StockSymbol, E.StockPrice ) SELECT S.SubscriberId, S.DeviceName, S.SubscriberLocale, E.StockSymbol, E.StockPrice FROM StockSubscriptions S JOIN StockEvents E ON S.StockSymbol = E.StockSymbol LEFT OUTER JOIN StockEventsChron c ON S.StockSymbol = c.StockSymbol WHERE S.StockTriggerValue <= E.StockPrice AND (S.StockTriggerValue > c.StockPrice OR c.StockPrice IS NULL) here :StockTriggerValue=30 < c.StockPrice=50 so no notification for Scott, why ?can anyone help me?
Hi to all, I want to study Sql server Service broker, have some questions1. What is the use of service broker ?2. Where this will use ? (With example)3. How to enable Service broker? Because i have sql server 2005 version but no folder like service broker.
Im having a hard time understanding everything required to create a simple Service Broker example. Can someone please assist? Source code would be ideal, but if not "do this, do that" would even be helpful.
I am trying to implement service broker. I send a message from my application code to the database to execute a specific stored procedure. How do i return the result set obtained by the execution of the stored procedure to the application.
My service broker seems to be broken... The database was restored from another crashed server but i have tried the
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON DATABASE::[SPYDERONTHEWEB] TO [SA];
The error i'm getting is
Service Broker needs to access the master key in the database 'SpyderOnTheWeb'. Error code 25. The master key has to exist and th service master key encryption is required.
It will be great to have an update on MS plans to solve the problem of using Service Broker for remote users who sit behind the NAT. Any news will be appreciated.
Hello , I am trying to Implement distribution of the Stock Quotes over the LAN(only within the Network) and showing the live changing stock Quotes on the front end (in datagrid) installed at each clients desktop.I am receiving the Stock prices over the TCP / IP from the Stock Exchange. I am recieving atleast 10-15 messages per second over the TCP / IP from the Stock Exchange. Now i need to distribute this feed to Each connected client.
I tried doing it from TCP / IP , but in vein. Can we install the SQL 2005 Database Client Version on every client and use Service broker instaed of Live TCP / IP connections programmatically?
Ideally Can i dump the meesages from Stock Exchange in to each connected client's database locally and each front end application will keep a record of all the incomming messages.i.e Front end have a notification event , it will referesh the Datagrid in Front end accordingly...
Is it possible to develop Service Broker in .Net 1.1 (VS 2003)? Currently I have a project developed in .Net 1.1 and I want to add a new method utilize the message queue concept (instead of using MSMQ, using Service Broker SQL 2005), although my DB is SQL server 2005.
I am looking at the Service Broker as a way to notify multiple clients that there has been data changed on a table in the shared database. These clients may or may not be online. When there is a change, the notification should fire off a query to refresh the clients local cache. Is this a situation where Service Broker would help me? Can multiple clients recieve the notification at different times ( some recieve while online, some recieve when they come back online)? Any help on this would be appreciated. It seems from what I read that the messages are pulled off the queue when a notification has taken place. Is this correct? If so, can I set it to behave differently?
Let's assume the situation: we have Initiator and Target. Target is behind ISP's NAT and can't be published outside. So, when Initiator sends a message to Target, Target will not be able to establish a backward connection and will not send an acknowledge. Initiator will retry and retry...
I have tried the following, each runs successfully with no error, but nothing is in the queues, what can be the issue? CREATE MESSAGE TYPE SentMsgType VALIDATION = WELL_FORMED_XML;
CREATE CONTRACT MQContract (SentMsgType SENT BY ANY );
CREATE QUEUE SentQueue WITH STATUS=ON, RETENTION=OFF;
CREATE QUEUE ReceivedQueue WITH STATUS=ON, RETENTION=OFF;
CREATE SERVICE SentService ON QUEUE SentQueue (MQContract);
CREATE SERVICE ReceivedService ON QUEUE ReceivedQueue (MQContract);
SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[insertTrigger] ON [dbo].[tblBBB] FOR INSERT AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; DECLARE @handle uniqueidentifier DECLARE @msgBody nvarchar(500)
select @msgBody = someString from inserted
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @handle FROM SERVICE SentService TO SERVICE 'ReceivedService', 'CURRENT DATABASE' ON CONTRACT MQContract;
--Sends a message SEND ON CONVERSATION @handle MESSAGE TYPE SentMsgType ('<message>' + @msgBody + '</message>') END CONVERSATION @handle WITH CLEANUP; END
SELECT * FROM SentQueue SELECT * FROM ReceivedQueue;
Can anyone let meknow how do i enable a service broker. I am trying to enable a service broker for an issuetracker application to get change of events in my database. When ever i try enabling it using the ALTER DATABASE [ databse] set Enable_Broker. it takes abt more that 2 hrs or more but doesnt show as enabled. Thanks in Advance, Pawan Venugopal
So SQLDependencies failed to do what I wanted them to do for my Cache Invalidating, so i'm going to humor another possibility for a half day - Triggers on my database table that communicate messages to my C# inside my ASP.NET App. Any advice on how to tap into a message queue with C#? I'm thinking that my messages could be 1 of about 100 different strings as far as what occurred on the Database Tables
