Combining These 2 Short Stored Procedures
Dec 18, 2003
CREATE PROCEDURE MyBooks_Selling
(
@MemberID SMALLINT
)
AS
SELECT * FROM v_BookInfo_Sellers_Extended WHERE MemberID=@MemberID
GO
GRANT EXEC
ON MyBooks_Selling
TO bto
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE MyBooks_Buying
(
@MemberID SMALLINT
)
AS
SELECT * FROM v_BookInfo_Buyers_Extended WHERE MemberID=@MemberID
GO
GRANT EXEC
ON MyBooks_Buying
TO bto
GO
Is there a way to make it so I could combine those 2 prcedures and choose which table i would like to select from based on another input parameter? I tried it that way but it didnt work...so im asking here to make sure
thx
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 23, 2005
I have two stored proceduresALTER PROCEDURE dbo.qryCountOne(@inputID int)AS SELECT COUNT(*) AS CountOne FROM dbo.TableOne WHERE(dbo.TableOne.value = @inputID)ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.qryCountTwo(@inputID int)AS SELECT COUNT(*) AS CountTwo FROM dbo.TableTwo WHERE(dbo.TableTwo.value = @inputID)What would be the best way to combine these two, so that I only have tomake one database query, and the two values (CountOne, and CountTwo)will get returned to me?Any helppointers greatly appreciated,Noel
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2015
Is there a way to combine 2 stored procedures with a different set off parameters.
Basically my 1st stored procedure has the following parameters:
1.@PlanID
2.@FinancialYearID
3.@RangetypeID
My second stored proc has the following:
1.@FinancialYearID
2.@IndicatorID
3.@VersionID
I have researched and so far nothing seems to be working. There is a conflict between the FinancialYearID of the 1st and 2nd stored procs.
My overall result is the combination of the 1st and 2nd storedprocs in 1.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2006
Hi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2004
my question is this....I have to fields I want to retreive..One is a nvarchar and the other is an integer...I want to return them in this format
(interger field + '/' + nvarcharfield) as combinedfield
problem is i get errors when I try to get this value
I just need the info I know you cant add theses two together...
Example of output needed....
31/OfficeVisit
my sp
ALTER procedure EncounterCodes_NET
(
@ClinicID int
)
as
select
CombinedField=(EnCodeID + EnCodeDesc)
from
Clinic_Encodes
Where
ClinicID=@ClinicID
Order by Sortorder
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2007
Is it possible to combine a stored procedure result set and a table into one dataset? For example, if I have a stored procedure with field "TradeID", and a table with "TradeID", can I join the them in a dataset?
Thanks.
Brad
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2007
Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.
For example, even this simple little guy:
CREATE PROCEDURE BOB
AS
PRINT 'BOB'
GO
Gets created as a system stored procedure.
Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?
Thanks,
Jason
View 16 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2007
Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID, S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName', T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails I INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2008
Greetings:
I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.
How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?
Thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2006
We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.
For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.
I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.
What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?
Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?
Thanks!
View 24 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?
How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
Hello
I'm start to work with SSIS.
We have a lot (many hundreds) of old (SQL Server2000) procedures on SQL 2005.
Most of the Stored Procedures ends with the following commands:
SET @SQLSTRING = 'SELECT * INTO ' + @OutputTableName + ' FROM #RESULTTABLE'
EXEC @RETVAL = sp_executeSQL @SQLSTRING
How can I use SSIS to move the complete #RESULTTABLE to Excel or to a Flat File? (e.g. as a *.csv -File)
I found a way but I think i'ts only a workaround:
1. Write the #Resulttable to DB (changed Prozedure)
2. create data flow task (ole DB Source - Data Conversion - Excel Destination)
Does anyone know a better way to transfer the #RESULTTABLE to Excel or Flat file?
Thanks for an early Answer
Chaepp
View 9 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2004
how can i convert the varchar value to a column of data type int?
i am trying to do this
declare @w varchar(50)
select @w = col1 from myTable
select colname from mtable
where mtableID in (@w)
but the mtableID is a int
and i always got
Syntax error converting the varchar value to a column of data type int.
thanks for everyone for helping
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2004
can anyone tell me do i have to use sqldmo in asp.net C# to backup or restore database?
and how can i execute the *.sql file in asp.net C#?
thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
When I get the results from my query, some of the columns labels are too short and look like this "ran....". How do I extend the cells??
Thanks
US Navy - We are fueled, armed, and go for launch.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2007
Hi all. Is it possible to convert the date to shortdate?
select e.hireddate from hremployees e
it returns 2/07/2007 12:00:00 AM
How can i neglect the time?
Thanks
-Ron-
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2007
Problems Encountered Upgrading SQL 2005 SP1 to SQL 2005 SP2 (9.0.3042.1):
In Summary:
Maintenance Plans Broken
Database Mail Broken
Reporting Services Report Viewer web part displays US Format dates instead of report design English-Australian. .
In Detail:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 SP2 was downloaded from Microsoft.com. This download occurred after 5 March 2007 and the file version was 9.0.3042.1 (SQLServer2005SP2-KB921896-x86-ENU.exe)
During the Installation of SP2 by a Domain Administrator an error occurred on the Database Engine. A Hotfix Exception was raised and the setup completed with errors.
The Error Log reported a problem:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product : Database Services (MSSQLSERVER)
Product Version (Previous): 2047
Product Version (Final) :
Status : Failure
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGHotfixSQL9_Hotfix_KB921896_sqlrun_sql.msp.log
Error Number : 29534
Error Description : MSP Error: 29534 Service 'MSSQLSERVER' could not be started. Verify that you have sufficient privileges to start system services. The error code is (1067) The process terminated unexpectedly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SQL Server service could not be manually started. An error was reported in the event viewer:
One or more files do not match the primary file of the database. If you are attempting to attach a database, retry the operation with the correct files. If this is an existing database, the file may be corrupted and should be restored from a backup.
It was noted that a new file mssqlsystemresource.ldf had been copied to the %data% folder.
Note: As part of separating data and log files, both the master and mssqlsystemresource databases had been previously moved to another volume %data% whilst their respective log files had been moved to a separate volume also %log%. This had occurred after SP1 was initially installed and months prior to the SP2 install using Microsoft KB articles to detach and reattach the databases. It appears that the SP2 installer does not work correctly if mssqlsystemresource mdf and ldf files are not in the same location.
Whilst the Engine could not be started €“ the new mssqlsystemresource.ldf file was manually moved to the %log% file, overwriting the previous version.
The SQL Server Service was now able to start without any errors.
Since the SQL Server Service has been started two major errors have become apparent:
The following error is recorded when trying to create a new maintenance plan:
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio
------------------------------
Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.SmoEnum)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
Invalid column name 'from_msx'.
Invalid column name 'has_targets'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 207)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.3042&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=207&LinkId=20476
Also when using the maintenance plan wizard the following error is recorded when the Wizard attempts to save the plan at the end:
TITLE: Maintenance Plan Wizard Progress
------------------------------
Saving maintenance plan failed.
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.SmoEnum)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
Invalid column name 'msx_job_id'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 207)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.3042&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=207&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
Database Mail is also broken on the server. The Database Mail Log reports an €œActivation Failure€? when a test email is sent. (the email does not arrive). The SQL Log and event viewer also report the following message:
The activated proc [dbo].[sp_sysmail_activate] running on queue msdb.dbo.ExternalMailQueue output the following: 'Error executing extended stored procedure: Invalid Parameter'
Another error affects Reporting Services reports that are accessed using the SharePoint V2.0 Web parts ( rsWebparts.cab) . The date picker in the Report Viewer web part now only recognises US format dates. It is important to note that the same reports run through the Report Manager web site work correctly using DD/MM/YYYY (English-Australian ) date format for the report picker.
It is noted that the rsWebparts.cab file was not updated by SQL 2005 SP2 install. However, the behaviour of the Report Viewer web part has definitely been affected by the SP2 install.
Are the first two issues related? Are they due to the fact that mssqlsystemresource mdf and ldf files had been moved to an unexpected location prior to SP2? How can this be fixed?
Are the Reporting Services SharePoint (V2) web parts going to be updated? We are not in a position to upgrade our Portal 2003/SharePoint Servcies V2 installation at the present time.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
Here is a fairly basic question in which I'd like assistance. In determining a standard for a schema, for simplicity, my thinking is that using the long data type would meet our purposes.
Are there any thoughts on mapping out where we would not need to take advantage of long vs short? I realize the space but for this particular table, space won't an issue.
Thanks!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2007
Hi,
Do you know how to write stored procedures inside another stored procedure in MS SQL.
Create procedure spMyProc inputData varchar(50)
AS
----- some logical
procedure spMyProc inputInsideData varchar(10)
AS
--- some logical
--- go
-------
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2008
I am writing a set of store procedures (around 30), most of them require the same basic logic to get an ID, I was thinking to add this logic into an stored procedure.
The question is: Would calling an stored procedure from within an stored procedure affect performance? I mean, would it need to create a separate db connection? am I better off copying and pasting the logic into all the store procedures (in terms of performance)?
Thanks in advance
John
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2007
Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly. For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie
exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created'
returns an int value as 1
(performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created')
but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie:
exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1'
which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc):
SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example).
My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert).
Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2007
Is there a way to short cut through the fields in a table when updating them or inserting?
ie. I have a table with 78 fields and could grow with time. Is there a way to run the UPDATE or INSERT TO [table](blah....) without listing all the table fields?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2004
Hello, i have database front end is Access, and backend is sql server. The front end, there are two dropbox, called 'CountyLongName', and 'CountyShortName'. I want to: when i select a countyLongName, there it will pop up the exact CountyShortName in anohter field.
For example, when i click Howard Couty in the 'CountyLongNmae', it will automatically display "HW" in the 'CountyShortName" Field. How can i do that? Thanks.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2007
any keyword shortcut to exec a sql job?
do i have to exec step individually when there are more than 2 steps?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2006
Hi all,
I have a view with a datetime column,
when viewing the column data the format is:
" 2006-06-12T12:00:00.0000000+03:00 "
while i'm only want to see the date part
(that is, 2006-06-12, and if possible in the format: dd/mm/yyyy)
now, when i'm using convert( varchar(10), [column_name],101)
i'm getting the format i need but the problem is that i'm
"losing" the date type, is it possible to view it as the
format i stated and still as a datetime type ??
Regards,
Pit
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
This is a question concerning query optimisation. Sorry if it's a bit long,but thanks to anyone who has the patience to help - This is my first posthere...If I have two tables: 'tblContact' and 'tblCategory' where categories arelike:Code Name010101 Short010102 Fat010103 StupidThe junction table 'tblConCat' has fields CctConID, CctCatCode to tell mewhich contacts have which category codes. These are nchar(6) fields, if itmakes any difference.If I need to find all people who are short, fat and stupid I can see twoways:Solution One:SELECT tblContact.* FROM tblContact WHEREConID IN (SELECT CctConID FROM tblConCat WHERE CctCatCode='010101') ANDConID IN (SELECT CctConID FROM tblConCat WHERE CctCatCode='010102') ANDConID IN (SELECT CctConID FROM tblConCat WHERE CctCatCode='010103')Solution Two:Build a helper table which contains the codes I'm looking forSELECT tblContact.* FROM tblContactWHERE ConID IN(SELECT CctConIDFROM tblConCat INNER JOIN tblHelperON tblConCat.CctCatCode = tblHelper.HlpCatCodeGROUP BY CctConID HAVING Count(*)=3)I have tried them both out and although I looked at the query analyzer itprovided more information than I knew what to do with. In practise theyboth provide similar working times (I wait about a second) but I thought thefirst looked rather inefficient and thought my helper table might help.There are about 30,000 contact records, 180 category records and 120,000junction table records.All I am looking for comments on any pros and cons of these two approaches -does one look that bad? The database was migrated from Access where thehelper table really did help, but using SQL Server I might not need it.Thanks again, if you got this far!
View 16 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2007
I have a suite of several SSRS reports that differ essentially on the stored procedure called. All have very the same one-page header block and all have a footer. Those where a large number of pages are produced, page without fault when printed or converted to PDF.
Two page reports often break down on printing, so that page 1 only has the header and a footer and all the detail lines are printed on page2 (together with the footer). However on the screen the report paged correctly.
I have checked all the obvious problems such as page dimensions exceeding that of the print medium. (A series of such problems was fixed earlier in development.)
I have observed this behaviour with SQL2005 SP1 and SP2 (i.e. SP2 did not provide any fix in this area). The host OS for development and production is Windows 2003 server. The tests were done by viewing in IE6 and the fault only became apparent when going to print preview, printing or in PDF production.
This has the appearance of a bug in SSRS hereby intermediate length reports are not handled correctly. It appears to happen when the amount of detail lines just fills page 2. As soon as the report has sufficient lines to be 3 pages long (page 1 is header plus some details lines plus footer, page 2 is full of detail lines plus footer and page 3 is remaining detail lines plus footer then the problem is no longer seen! Where the detail lines will all fit on page 1, then the problem is not seen.
I observe this variation in behaviour since I am able to switch between different sized datasets and thus switch between the different scenarios described above. I should also note that the reports are in landscape mode.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2008
Hi I am trying to create stored proc and having some performance issue.
Here is the requirement,
Stored Proc parameters A,B
A is required.
B is optional. The default value for B is 0.
Here is the code inside stored proc:
IF (B = 0)
SET B = 1
SELECT * FROM TABLE1
INNER JOIN TABLE2 ON TABLE1.Column1 = TABLE2.Column1
WHERE A= 2008
AND (table2.ColumnB = B or 1 = B)
If I am passing B as 20 I am having performance issue to pull the data.
If I replace B with any other number the query is working fine.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hello to all,Below the sample code:declare @arg_szMsgText ntextset @arg_szMsgText = isnull(@arg_szMsgText, N'unknown message')Now the error message I get:"The assignment operator operation cannot take a ntext data type as anargument."Explanation:I'm using it in a SP. I was trying thousand things to make it running,and the only way I maked was, I get it when I set the return value fromisnull fucntion to nvarchar or varchar variable.The problem is, the field in DB, where the value of @arg_szMsgText iswritten) is ntext, so I need to use this format.In the description of isnull function (help) is written:----------------------------------------------------Argumentscheck_expressionIs the expression to be checked for NULL. check_expression can be ofany type.replacement_valueIs the expression to be returned if check_expression is NULL.replacement_value must have the same type as check_expresssion.Return TypesReturns the same type as check_expression.-----------------------------------------------------so ite means, I should be able to use this in such a way ...I know I can assign the value in other way (like by if @variable isnull ....), but if there is already function doing this, why not to useit, if it helds the code more clear?Any ideas? Maybe I'm doing something wrong.Matik
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2006
Hello all, this is my first post, and I think I've found something interesting between sql 2005 and 2000. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
I am attempting to migrate a system from SQL 2000(v 8.00.2039 - Enterprise Edition) to SQL 2005 (v9.0.2047 - Standard Edition ), and a few of my most complex queries are generating errors. I was able to isolate the problem to a fairly simple query that works in SQL 2000, but generates an error in SQL 2005.
I believe that the problem has something to do with how short-circuiting is handled in the WHERE clause. I'm not sure if short-circuiting is really going on when these statements are parsed, but it seems to describe the situation well.
To replicate the problem, first create the following table and fill it with values:
----------------------------------------------
create table OrgView (ORGNAME varchar(100), QID int, ANSWER varchar(100))
insert into orgview (orgname, qid, answer) values('org1', 120, '1')
insert into orgview (orgname, qid, answer) values('org2', 94, '2006-06-06')
insert into orgview (orgname, qid, answer) values('org3', 98, 'free kevin')
----------------------------------------------
The second value (org2) contains a date, but the rest do not.
Under both systems, the following contrived query works fine:
SELECT orgname FROM OrgView
WHERE (QID = 94
AND CONVERT(DATETIME, Answer) = '2006-06-06')
It would seem, that when QID = 94, the expression short circuits, and the CONVERT statement doesn't run. This is good, because the CONVERT statement would throw an error whenever 'Answer' doesn't contain a date.
However, if modify the query by adding an OR to the end like this:
SELECT orgname FROM OrgView
WHERE (QID = 94
AND CONVERT(DATETIME, Answer) = '2006-06-06')
or QID=98
then the query fails on SQL 2005 with a 'Conversion failed when converting datetime from character string.' error.
On SQL 2000, the short circuiting works fine, and the above query returns 'org2' and 'org3'.
I know shortcircuiting may not be the best way to describe the set calculus going on in the background, but can anyone explain what is going on here? Is there any way to make SQL 2005 work like SQL 2000 in this specific case?
Thanks,
-Adam
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2008
Hi!We have SQL Server 2000 on virtual machine (slowly). We run a pair ofstored procedures from ADO.NET 2.0 (WebService):- first procedure: insert into table A a data row with correlationID- next procedure: search for inserted record in tab A bycorrelationID and insert value into tab B with constraint to tab A.The problem is when we try to do this in short time (few minutes)thousands times (5000/6000 pairs in 5/6 minutes) in 100 parallelthreads:query in second procedure cannot find inserted record in firstprocedure.Everything is dirty read. no transactions.Have you any ideas?edi
View 1 Replies
View Related