I am trying to use a simple BEGIN TRY and END TRY in my SP. It is giving a compile time error such as
Line 13: Incorrect syntax near 'try'.
Why is this, can somebody help me out. Yes i am sure it is SQL Server 2005 on my machine.
Hello,
actually i try to create a native c++ desktop-application that will have to access a SQL CE 3.1 db-file over OLE DB. For that purpose i want to use the same self written wrapper class(for the OLE DB stuff) that i use for a native WM2003 application that creates the db files to be accessed on the desktop application.
The WM2003 application including my wrapper class compiles fine with eVC++ 4.0.
But now with VS 2005 including the same class i got this compile error: "Redefinition of class IRowsetBookmark". I have to add that i used the application wizard to generate a mfc sdi application with database support(ODBC is used in this app, too).
I figured out that in the following 2 inlcuded files IRowsetBookmark is defined:
1)The manually included "ssceoledb30.h" in my wrapper class.
2)The probably from the application wizard included "oledb.h" (in "Microsoft Visual Studio 8VCPlatformSDKInclude")
My workaround for the moment is to comment the class definition in the file "ssceoledb30.h" out because i don't use this OLE DB interface in my wrapper class. But i don't think that this is the way that microsoft supposed to go.
Does anybody had this problem and solved it other way than simply comment one of the class definition out?
I would appreciate it when someone out there knows the answer and could tell me.
Kind regards,
Andre
I got some problem about message "Compile Error, In Query expression "
Someone help me please
Best Regard
My E-mail = paiboonm@cuel.co.th
Hi,
View 10 Replies View RelatedHi,
I'm having trouble with a Script Component in a data flow task. I have code that does a SqlCommand.ExecuteReader() call that throws an 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object' error. Thing is, the SqlCommand.ExecuteReader() call is already inside a Try..Catch block. Essentially I have two questions regarding this error:
a) Why doesn't my Catch block catch the exception?
b) I've made sure that my SqlCommand object and the SqlConnection property that it uses are properly instantiated, and the query is correct. Any ideas on why it is throwing that exception?
Hope someone could help.
We have a stored procedure that calculates the floor nr for users at our company campus using their office location. The calculation is done by a function that returns an integer. Unfortunately, not all users enter their information correctly so the function sometimes raises an error. Below is the code of that stored procedure.
UPDATE PERSONS
SET FLOORNR = dbo.FloorNR(OFFICELOCATION)
WHERE OFFICELOCATION IS NOT NULL
IF(@@ERROR <> 0 OR @@ROWCOUNT = 0)
BEGIN
RAISERROR ('Failed to calculate the floor number', 16, 1 ) with nowait
END
However, when the function dbo.FloorNR fails, it doesn't raise our error, but it seems to raise the error that comes from dbo.FloorNR.
How can we catch errors that come from dbo.FloorNr so that we can raise our own error? Our company still uses SQL 2000, so we cannot use the SQL 2005 try/catch option.
Hi,
I have the following stored procedure which is added to the windows scheduler. When it is run I'm getting an "Invalid use of null error", therefore I need to capture and any errors but I'm not sure how to do this. Can someone help?
Thanks.
Code:
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_Reminders] AS
DECLARE @ReminderSent datetime
DECLARE @getRecords CURSOR
DECLARE @err int
SELECT E.[RL Staff No], E.Forename, E.Surname, C.CourseName, V.CourseDate , E.Email, V.ReminderSent
FROM empdetails.dbo.v_Employee E
INNER JOIN Validation V ON E.[RL Staff No] = V.[RL Staff No]
INNER JOIN empdetails.dbo.v_Course C ON V.CourseCode = C.CourseCode
WHERE V.Completed Is Null AND V.ReminderSent Is Null AND V.CourseDate <= dateadd(dd, -3, getdate())
order by e.[rl staff no]
SET @getRecords = CURSOR FOR
SELECT V.ReminderSent
FROM empdetails.dbo.v_Employee E
INNER JOIN Validation V ON E.[RL Staff No] = V.[RL Staff No]
INNER JOIN empdetails.dbo.v_Course C ON V.CourseCode = C.CourseCode
WHERE V.Completed IS NULL AND V.ReminderSent IS NULL AND V.CourseDate <= dateadd(dd, -3, getdate())
ORDER BY e.[rl staff no]
OPEN @getRecords
FETCH NEXT FROM @getRecords INTO @ReminderSent
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS= 0
BEGIN
UPDATE Validation
SET ReminderSent = GetDate()
WHERE CURRENT OF @getRecords
FETCH NEXT FROM @getRecords INTO @ReminderSent
END
CLOSE @getRecords
DEALLOCATE @getRecords
GO
Hi everyone, I am using an SQL extended stored procedure to send emails in aDTS package using a cursor that goes through each row in a table.Email sending code below======================exec master.dbo.xp_smtp_sendmail@FROM = @sFrom,@FROM_NAME = @sFrom,@TO = @sRecepients,@subject = @sSubject,@message = @sBody,@type = N'text/html',@codepage = 0,@server =N'MYMAILSERVER'======================Fetch Next From EmailCursor ...Now the problem I have is that if an individual email address in invalidthen an error occurs and the whole DTS package falls over. What I would liketo be able to do is "catch the error", something like this (C# code used asexample)try{exec master.dbo.xp_smtp_sendmail@FROM = @sFrom,@FROM_NAME = @sFrom,@TO = @sRecepients,@subject = @sSubject,@message = @sBody,@type = N'text/html',@codepage = 0,@server =N'MYMAILSERVER'} catch {exec master.dbo.xp_smtp_sendmail@FROM = "arealaddress@mybusiness.com",@FROM_NAME = @sFrom,@TO = @sRecepients,@subject = @sSubject,@message = @sBody,@type = N'text/html',@codepage = 0,@server =N'MYMAILSERVER'}Is this possible??? Normally I would do all the email validation before theemail is entered into the database but unfortunately, I do not have accessto the application code so I am stuck doing it this way.Thanks in advanceMark
View 2 Replies View RelatedHey,Here's yet another question for you more knowledgeable than me Up to this point I have been using a try/catch statement when dealing with SQL, for exampleint result = 0;try{result = Int32.Parse(command.ExecuteScalar().ToString());}catch{result = 0;}But I read up one some error handling and I have no idea how to solve this anymore. Since I'll be using the catch block to catch exceptions, something like thiscatch (SqlException){throw;}So I was wondering what is the good, standard practice for dealing with this since I need the catch statement to set result to zero or I would end up with an error.Thanks in advance,Sixten
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for a discussion of the pros and cons of using TRY/CATCH as an error handler in a standard fashion with Stored Procedures. I've been using SQL Server for some time, and am accustomed to an approach of error handling in SPs that returns control from an SP via a common exit routine.
Has anyone defined an approach they would consider sharing? I realize that the reasons for standardizing on an approach includes requirements to your specific situation, so there are likely no perfect answers. I understand the basics of TRY/CATCH in SQL Server. Specifically, I'm looking for an approach where a common "Catch Handler" is used, paying attention to the issues around COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
If there are any threads that discuss this, let me know; I've performed a seach and found nothing so far.
Thanks,
Chuck
Is there a reason why the following code does not raise an error in my .NET 2005 application? Basically I have a try..catch in my stored procedure. Then I have a try...catch in my .NET application that I want to display the error message.
But, when the stored proc raisses the error, the .net code doesn't raise it's error. The .NET code DOES raise an error if I remove the try..catch from the SQL proc and let it error (no error handling), but not if I catch the error and then use RAISERROR to bubble-up the error to .NET app. (I really need to catch the error in my SQL proc and rollback the transaction before I raise the error up to my .NET app...)
SQL
BEGIN TRYBEGIN TRANSACTION trnName
DO MY STUFF.... <---- Error raisedCOMMIT TRANSACTION trnName
END TRY
BEGIN CATCHROLLBACK TRANSACTION trnName
RAISERROR('There was an error',10,1)
END CATCH
ASP.NET CODE (No error raised)
Try
daAdapter.SelectCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()Catch ex As SqlException
Err.Raise(50001, "ProcName", "Error:" + ex.Message)
End Try
hello!
im new to sql... what i'm trying to do is catch the error on insert or update statment of sql.. sound simple but please..
this is the sample table design...
tbl_Customer
CustomerID int(4) Primary AutoIncrement
CustomerCode nvarchar(25)
CustomerName nvarchar(25)
..
..
Deleted bit(1)
what i'm trying to do is when a record is deleted, it's not actually deleted
in the table but only marked 1 (true) the Deleted field.. because i don't want
to lose the relationship...
it's easy to do this on insert statement like this..
Create Procedure InsertCustomer(@param1 ....) AS
IF NOT EXIST (SELECT * FROM tbl_Customer WHERE DELETED = 0) THEN
// do insert statement here
ELSE
// Do nothing
GO
this is also easy if i create a index constraints on the table.. but this will violate my design idea..
so anybody can help me to create the procedure in update statement and insert statement
hi,
I try to write a function which includes a statement:
SELECT @dateReturn = CAST(@dateString As datetime)
to convert a string to datetime.
When it runs, sometime it will generate :
"The conversion of a char data type to a datetime data type resulted in an out-of-range datetime value."
and all related are terminated.
Can I find a way to catch this error and don't let it terminate the whole thing? For
example, when this happens, I want to get datetime as NULL instead of just being
terminated.
Thanks.
Greetings all,
When an error occurs it is written to a log file (Assuming you have loggin on).
Anyone know of a way to catch the error in a variable?
When an error occurs I send an email explaining where there error happened and to view the logfile. I would like to include the last error in the email. Saves having to go view the log...
Thanks
Hi all,
I try to learn "How to Access Stored Procedures with ADO.NET 2.0 - VB 2005 Express: (1) Handling the Input and Output Parameters and (2) Reporting their Values in VB Forms". I found a good article "Calling Stored Procedures from ADO.NET" by John Paul Cook in http://www.dbzine.com/sql/sql-artices/cook6. I downloaded the source code into my VB 2005 Express:
Imports System.Data
Imports System.Data.SqlClient
Imports System.Data.SqlTypes
Public Class Form_Cook
Inherits System.Windows.Form.Form
#Region " Windows Form Designer generated code "
Public Sub New()
MyBase.New()
'This call is required by the Windows Form Designer.
InitializeComponent()
'Add any initialization after the InitializeComponent() call
End Sub
'Form overrides dispose to clean up the component list.
Protected Overloads Overrides Sub Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean)
If disposing Then
If Not (components Is Nothing) Then
components.Dispose()
End If
End If
MyBase.Dispose(disposing)
End Sub
'Required by the Windows Form Designer
Private components As System.ComponentModel.IContainer
'NOTE: The following procedure is required by the Windows Form Designer
'It can be modified using the Windows Form Designer.
'Do not modify it using the code editor.
Friend WithEvents GroupBox1 As System.Windows.Forms.GroupBox
Friend WithEvents labelPAF As System.Windows.Forms.Label
Friend WithEvents labelNbrPrices As System.Windows.Forms.Label
Friend WithEvents UpdatePrices As System.Windows.Forms.Button
Friend WithEvents textBoxPAF As System.Windows.Forms.TextBox
Friend WithEvents TenMostExpensive As System.Windows.Forms.Button
Friend WithEvents grdNorthwind As System.Windows.Forms.DataGrid
Friend WithEvents groupBox2 As System.Windows.Forms.GroupBox
<System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThrough()> Private Sub InitializeComponent()
Me.GroupBox1 = New System.Windows.Forms.GroupBox()
Me.labelPAF = New System.Windows.Forms.Label()
Me.labelNbrPrices = New System.Windows.Forms.Label()
Me.textBoxPAF = New System.Windows.Forms.TextBox()
Me.UpdatePrices = New System.Windows.Forms.Button()
Me.groupBox2 = New System.Windows.Forms.GroupBox()
Me.TenMostExpensive = New System.Windows.Forms.Button()
Me.grdNorthwind = New System.Windows.Forms.DataGrid()
Me.GroupBox1.SuspendLayout()
Me.groupBox2.SuspendLayout()
CType(Me.grdNorthwind, System.ComponentModel.ISupportInitialize).BeginInit()
Me.SuspendLayout()
'
'GroupBox1
'
Me.GroupBox1.Controls.AddRange(New System.Windows.Forms.Control() {Me.labelPAF, Me.labelNbrPrices, Me.textBoxPAF, Me.UpdatePrices})
Me.GroupBox1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 8)
Me.GroupBox1.Name = "GroupBox1"
Me.GroupBox1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(240, 112)
Me.GroupBox1.TabIndex = 9
Me.GroupBox1.TabStop = False
'
'labelPAF
'
Me.labelPAF.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 16)
Me.labelPAF.Name = "labelPAF"
Me.labelPAF.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(112, 32)
Me.labelPAF.TabIndex = 2
Me.labelPAF.Text = "Enter Price Adjustment Factor"
'
'labelNbrPrices
'
Me.labelNbrPrices.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 80)
Me.labelNbrPrices.Name = "labelNbrPrices"
Me.labelNbrPrices.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 16)
Me.labelNbrPrices.TabIndex = 5
'
'textBoxPAF
'
Me.textBoxPAF.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(120, 16)
Me.textBoxPAF.Name = "textBoxPAF"
Me.textBoxPAF.TabIndex = 0
Me.textBoxPAF.Text = ""
'
'UpdatePrices
'
Me.UpdatePrices.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(8, 48)
Me.UpdatePrices.Name = "UpdatePrices"
Me.UpdatePrices.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(88, 23)
Me.UpdatePrices.TabIndex = 6
Me.UpdatePrices.Text = "Update Prices"
'
'groupBox2
'
Me.groupBox2.Controls.AddRange(New System.Windows.Forms.Control() {Me.TenMostExpensive, Me.grdNorthwind})
<Part 1----To be continued due to the length of this post>
hi All,
Code:
begin try
begin transaction trans1
//some transaction
begin try
begin transaction trans2
//some transaction
//Raise Error
//commit transaction trans2
end try
begin catch
//Raise error
end catch
//some transaction
//commit transaction trans1
end try
begin catch
//Rollback trans1
end catch]
In the above code when an error is raised in the transaction trans2 the immediate catch is not invoked where as the outer catch is being invoked. I dont know y?. Can anybody help. Thanx
We have a view with many left joins. The original creators of this view might have been lazy or sloppy, I don't know. I have rewritten the query to proper inner joins where required and also nested left joins.
So rather then the following exemplary fragment
select <many items>
from A
left join B on B.id_A = A.id
left join C on C.id_B = B.idthis now looks like
select <many items>
from A
left join (B
join C on C.id_B = B.id
) on B.id_A = A.id
Compilation time of the original view was 18s, of the new rewritten view 4s. The performance of execution is also better (not counting the compile of course). The results of the query are identical. There are about 30 left joins in the original view.
I can imagine that the optimizer has difficulty with all these left joins. But 14s is quite a big difference. I haven't looked into detail in the execution plans yet. I noticed that in both cases the Reason for Early Termination of Statement Optimization was Time Out.
Hi all,
Just wondering what would be the normal or more efficient practice to insert/update a record.
1. Check for existence of primary record (using SELECT in stored procedure)
2. Capture error and handling
My problem is that I try to execute an stored procedure from a VB client.. but unable to capture the errors in SP, it just prompts the error and thats it, not responding to my "SELECT @err = @@ERROR" after the insert statement.
so now, I'm thinking of capturing the error on the client (which I am able to do) and handle it from there.. or to make sure that RI is enforced by 'searching' for Pks in the primary tables before executing the INSERT statement in my stored procedure.
Any advise would be appreciated..
Cyherus
hello,
i am trying to figure out how to check for failure or success AFTER the script task has ran.
its a piece of cake to write script logic that runs before the task but how do i check things and decide to retry AFTER a script task has ran?
i want to check for an error after a large table replication and if it detects that there was an error i want to RETRY.
dts does not seem to have this one specific piece of functionality. am i overlooking something?
I am new to T-SQL programming. I need to write a main procedures to execute multiple transactions. How could I structure the program so that each transaction will not abort if failed. Instead, the next transaction will keep running. At the very end the procedure will output the error and report them back to the main program in the output parameters. Looking for pseudo code.
View 6 Replies View Related
I was just debugging a stored procedure visual studio and I was surprised with what I was watching.
I'm running SQL 2005 and visual studio 2005. I have a set of nested try/catch blocks.
It fails on the first try and drops into the catch block just as it should. Within the catch block a dynamic sql statement is created. A try block begins and attempts to exec(@sql). It then drops to the catch block. However, I copy the statement into SQL Management Studio and it runs without error everytime.
Why is it dropping into the catch block? Logically it should just complete executing the statement continue without going into the catch block.
Do I have to reset the raiserror values between try blocks or something?
--Thanks--
Hi All,
I have the same question and error that Chopaka is getting:
"I have a SQL 2005 job that calls a stored proc. The job step returns the message "Query timeout expired....Message 7412...The step succeeded." The proc never actually ever did anything due to the query timeout, and the job continued on to other steps. I'm going to address the timeout issue eventually, but first I'd like to trap the timeout problem and force the job to end.
It appears that the query timeout isn't really an error, just a message. I've tried TRY-CATCH in the SP but the situation isn't caught, again probably due to the interpretation that it isn't an error."
I have reduced the "Remote Query time out" to 1 sec, in order to catch the error and to prevent the job from running, but the error is not caught.
Is there a way to catch this in the SQL or in the job step to prevent the job from continuing?
This is the script that I'm using without any luck
BEGIN TRY
BEGIN Transaction
Create table #tmpSummaryTable
(
)
insert into #tmpSummaryTable
select * from CDRServer01.iXtemp.dbo.gx_tbFTRSummary_test
COMMIT Transaction
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
DECLARE @err int
SELECT @err = @@error
PRINT '@@error: ' + ltrim(str(@err))
SELECT ERROR_NUMBER() ERNumber,
ERROR_MESSAGE() Error_Message
ROLLBACK
Return
END CATCH
Hello, I have stored procedure that when executed it will check to see if a given name is found in the database, if the name is found, I would like to have it continue on to do its work, however if the name is not found, I would like it to raise an error and then stop execution at that point, however, the way it is currently working is, if the name is not found, it catches the error, raises it and then continues on and tries to do its work, which then it bombs out because it can't. I wasn't sure if there was a way to stop the execution of the procedure in the catch statement. I don't think I want to raise the error level to 20-25 because I don't want to drop the connection to the database per say, I just want to halt execution.
Here is a simple example of what I have:
Code Snippet
begin try
if not exists (select * from sys.database_principals where [name] = 'flea')
raiserror('flea not found', 16, 1)
end try
begin catch
declare @ErrorMessage nvarchar(4000);
declare @ErrorSeverity int;
select
@ErrorMessage = error_message(),
@ErrorSeverity = error_severity();
raiserror(@ErrorMessage, @ErrorSeverity, 1);
end catch
go
begin
print 'hello world'
end
At this point, if the user name (flea) is not found, I don't want it ever to get to the point of 'Hello World', I would like the error raised and the procedure to exit at this point. Any advice would be appreciated on how to best handle my situation!
Thanks,
Flea
Hello everyone,
I have a package that should accomplish the following task:
- Loop on all files in a given directory.
- Before proccessing the current file in the Enumerator, it should be moved to a folder called "importing"
- Load the content of the file into a destination DB.
- After a successfull load, the file is moved from the "importing" to the "success" folder.
- If anything went wrong during the load process, the file should be moved from the "importing" to the "error" folder and an e-mail should be sent out to a certain admin account.
What I have done so far:
My control flow looks like this:
Foreach Loop containing the following tasks:
- File System Task: moving the current file from its original path to the "importing" folder
- Data Flow Task1: performing some transformations and insertions into the DB and raw files.
- Data Flow Task2: performing some transformations and insertions into the DB and raw files.
- Data Flow Task3: performing some transformations and final insertions into the DB.
- File System Task: moving the current file from the "importing" to the "success" folder
Question:
I do not know how to catch the event that one of my three Data Flow Tasks has failed and in this case perform two simple tasks, namely...
- File System Task: moving the current file from the "importing" to the "error" folder
- Send Mail Task: sending a configured e-mail message to a ceratin administrator.
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Samar
When I install the SQL Server 2005 SP2 on my vista laptop, I get the following message: SQL server setup failed to compile te Managed Object Format (MOF) file c:program filesmicrosoft SQL Server90sharedsqlmgmproviderxpsp2up.mof. To proceed, see "troubleshooting an installation of SQL Server 2005" or "how to: View SQL Server 2005...
What did I wrong?
Greets,
Wouter
hi all,
All of a sudden my application started crashing when trying execute dml statements on sql server mobile database (sdf file). Frustating thing is that whole application crashes without any error message. this happens for all kinds for DML statement but not all the time. Sometimes it would fail for delete statement such as delete from table; or for insert into statement
my problem catch does not catch the error. There is no way to find out teh what is causing this error
SqlCeConnection sqlcon = new SqlCeConnection("
Data Source = '\Program Files\HISSymbol\HISSymboldb.sdf';"
);
SqlCeCommand sqlcmd = new SqlCeCommand();
sqlcmd.CommandText = Insert into company('AA', 'Lower Plenty Hotel');
sqlcmd.Connection = sqlcon;
SqlCeDataReader sqldr = null;
try
{
sqlcon.Open();
//use nonquery if result is not needed
sqlcmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); // application crashes here
}
catch (Exception e)
{
base.myErrorMsg = e.ToString();
}
finally
{
if (sqlcon != null)
{
if (sqlcon.State != System.Data.ConnectionState.Closed)
sqlcon.Close();
sqlcon.Dispose();
}
}//end of finlally
Welcome
i am want to teach sql . how to
install compile
I'm currently receiving the following error message whilst attempting to install SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition on Windows Server 2003 (32 Bit):
Error 29528. The setup has encountered an unexpected error while Installing performance counters. The error is: The system cannot find the file specified.
This server already has an install of SQL Server 2000 as the default instance. I'm attempting to install a new named instance of SQL Server 2005.
Extract from log:
<Func Name='LaunchFunction'>
Function=Do_sqlPerfmon2
<Func Name='GetCAContext'>
<EndFunc Name='GetCAContext' Return='T' GetLastError='0'>
Doing Action: Do_sqlPerfmon2
PerfTime Start: Do_sqlPerfmon2 : Tue Jun 12 10:20:02 2007
<Func Name='Do_sqlPerfmon2'>
<EndFunc Name='Do_sqlPerfmon2' Return='0' GetLastError='2'>
PerfTime Stop: Do_sqlPerfmon2 : Tue Jun 12 10:20:02 2007
MSI (s) (4C:FC) [10:20:02:833]: Executing op: ActionStart(Name=Rollback_Do_sqlPerfmon2.D20239D7_E87C_40C9_9837_E70B8D4882C2,Description=Removing performance counters,)
<EndFunc Name='LaunchFunction' Return='0' GetLastError='0'>
MSI (s) (4C:FC) [10:20:02:849]: Executing op: CustomActionSchedule(Action=Rollback_Do_sqlPerfmon2.D20239D7_E87C_40C9_9837_E70B8D4882C2,ActionType=1281,Source=BinaryData,Target=Rollback_Do_sqlPerfmon2,CustomActionData=100Removing performance counters200000DTSPipelineC:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90DTSBinnDTSPERF.INI)
MSI (s) (4C:FC) [10:20:02:849]: Executing op: ActionStart(Name=Do_sqlPerfmon2.D20239D7_E87C_40C9_9837_E70B8D4882C2,Description=Installing performance counters,)
MSI (s) (4C:FC) [10:20:02:849]: Executing op: CustomActionSchedule(Action=Do_sqlPerfmon2.D20239D7_E87C_40C9_9837_E70B8D4882C2,ActionType=1025,Source=BinaryData,Target=Do_sqlPerfmon2,CustomActionData=100Installing performance counters200000C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90DTSBinnDTSPERF.INIC:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90DTSBinnDTSPERF.HC:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90DTSBinnDTSPipelinePerf.dllDTSPipeline0DTSPipelinePrfData_OpenPrfData_CollectPrfData_Close)
MSI (s) (4C:94) [10:20:02:864]: Invoking remote custom action. DLL: C:WINDOWSInstallerMSI1683.tmp, Entrypoint: Do_sqlPerfmon2
<Func Name='LaunchFunction'>
Function=Do_sqlPerfmon2
<Func Name='GetCAContext'>
<EndFunc Name='GetCAContext' Return='T' GetLastError='0'>
Doing Action: Do_sqlPerfmon2
PerfTime Start: Do_sqlPerfmon2 : Tue Jun 12 10:20:02 2007
<Func Name='Do_sqlPerfmon2'>
<EndFunc Name='Do_sqlPerfmon2' Return='2' GetLastError='2'>
PerfTime Stop: Do_sqlPerfmon2 : Tue Jun 12 10:20:02 2007
Gathering darwin properties for failure handling.
Error Code: 2
MSI (s) (4C!F0) [10:23:46:381]: Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Integration Services -- Error 29528. The setup has encountered an unexpected error while Installing performance counters. The error is: The system cannot find the file specified.Error 29528. The setup has encountered an unexpected error while Installing performance counters. The error is: The system cannot find the file specified.
You can ignore this and it will complete the installation, but subsequently trying to patch with SP2 will fail on the same sections - Hotfix.exe crashes whilst attempting to patch Database Services, Integration Services and Client Components (3 separate crashes).
I've removed SQL Server 2005 elements and tried to re-install, but it's not improved the situation.
Any ideas?
In general as understand if we have a stored procedure that does operations like inserts or updates, it makes perfect sense to use a rollback operation within a transaction.
So, if something goes wrong and the transaction does not complete, all changes will be reverted and an error description will be thrown for example.
Nevertheless, does using a rollback within a try catch statement, make sense in a read only stored procedure, that practically executes some dynamic sql just to select data from some tables?
I have around 100 Stored procedures, all of them read only. Today a colleague suggested adding try-catch blocks with rollback to all of them. But since they are just selecting data, I don't see a clear benefit of doing so, compared to the hassle of changing such a big number of SP's.
When I try and create the following stored procedure, I get the following error message:
Any ideas as to what went wrong? Here is the stored procedure
USE [DBS07]GO/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[updateMarketName] Script Date: 09/17/2007 22:28:20 ******/SET ANSI_NULLS ONGOSET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONGOCREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[updateSubMarketName]( @inMarketId int, @inSubMarketId int, @inSubMarketDescription nvarchar(100), @inActive nvarchar(2), @inLastUpdateDate datetime, @inLastUpdateUser nvarchar(100))AS SET NOCOUNT OFF;UPDATE [SubMarket] SET [SubMarketDescription] = @inSubMarketDescription, [Active]= @inActive, [LastUpdateDate] = @inLastUpdateDate,[LastUpdateUser] = @inLastUpdateDateUserWHERE ([MarketId] = @inMarketId)AND (SubMarketId]= @inSubMarketId)
Here is my error message
Error message in Red:Msg 137, Level 15, State 2, Procedure updateSubMarketName, Line 12Must declare the scalar variable "@inLastUpdateDateUser".
I have one procedure that gets executed many times per day(thousands at least). I consistently get blocking in my database, as users compile this stored procedure. How can I keep this from recompiling all the time, and bogging down my database? I tried the keep plan option in the portion of the code that uses tembdb, and that doesn't work. thanks.
View 1 Replies View RelatedTo all,
When a stored proc is executed in SQL server 2000, it is holding a EXCLUSIVE [COMPILE] lock on the proc and the proc os getting recompiled every time it is executed. This is happening with most of the procs that are called from this proc. When multiple users are executing the same process they are having to wait until the other users are done compiling the procs. The lapse time is growing exponentially with multiple users.
I have looked at several places to find a solution for this. Microsoft Articles Q243586 and Q263889 have provided me with some options; but at this point, I need a miracle.
All these procs users temp tables. I have got the code changed to replace most of them with Table datatypes (on SQL2K only) . Some of them still need to use temp tables as they are cross referenced by multiple procs.
I am hopeful, there is some one out there who has dealt with this kind of situations before. Any ideas/sugessions are greatly appreciated..
Thanks
I have the following table;CREATE TABLE [x_Note] ([x_NoteId] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,[Note] [varchar] (7200) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_Pref_CP1_CI_AS NOTNULL ,CONSTRAINT [PK_x_NoteId] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED([x_NoteId],) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [USERDATA] ,) ON [USERDATA]GOMy clients want me to take the contents of the Note column for each rowand combine them. In other words, they basically want:Note = Note [accumulated from previous rows] + Char(13) [because theywant a carriage return] + Note [from current record].What is the most efficient and relatively painless way to do this? Ithink it might require a cursor, but I'm not sure if there is a moreelegant set-based method to make this happen.
View 14 Replies View Related