Compiling All Stored Procedures At A Time
Jan 12, 2000How can I compile all the stored procedures in the database at one shot?
thanks in advance
Pranav
ADVERTISEMENT
Strange Errors In Compiling Stored Procedures
Jun 29, 2001Comiling a stored procedure produces the message
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]COUNT field incorrect
This is produced in Query Analyser and OSQL
Normal syntax error gives errors of the Form 'Msg 1234 line no. '
Introducing syntax errors to get a normal message still gives the Count field incorrect Message. There is no user COUNT field
Any ideas
E
Sysdepends And Compiling Stored Procedures In The Correct Order
Nov 9, 2000Hello:
We are presently testing various upgrade scripts to our current application which is scheduled to shortly be upgraded to mssql 7.0. We are testing under mssql 7.0,sp 2.
As it works now, I receive some existing scripts that have been modified and some stored proceures that are new. For the existing stored procedures, I usually take my best guess as to what the order of creation will be, test it in my script for recompile(actually all are dropped first and then the guesswork on the creates). This is usually trial and error as I run the script, see any sysdepends errors such as:
"CREATE PROCEDURE: ep_invoiceheaderformat_spv0101
Cannot add rows to sysdepends for the current stored procedure because it depends on the missing object 'ep_assumepay"
And then move the order of the create procedures around in the script and try again until I get a clean run in a test database I use just to syntactically test the scripts.
I looked at the sysdepends table for the database and pretty much decided that the object numbers and stuff was pretty much incomprehensible to me.
Alternatively I could compile each one separately but I would have the same problem subsequently trying to generate a script of the al of the create procedures... in the right order which would not
My question is:
1) Is there a way I can read and understand what the data means in sysdepends?
2) Figure out a way to utilize the data there to create or generate the create stored procedure text in the correct clean compile order?
3) Any other suggestions?
Any information which can be proveded will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
David Spaisman
SQL Server Error 7405 While Compiling A Stored Proc
Jul 18, 2000I am attempting to compile a stored proc that contains SQL statements that access databases across different SQL servers. I am getting the following error:
"Heterogeneous queries require the ANSI_NULLS and ANSI_WARNINGS options to be set for the connection. This ensures consistent query semantics. Enable these options and then reissue your query."
Does this mean that I need to put the necessary statements (Set ANSI_NULLS ON etc.) in my stored proc or that I need to configure my SQL Server differently somehow? I tried the former without success.
Thanks.
Receiving Error 156 - Incorrect Syntax When Compiling Stored Procedure
May 14, 2008The following query works fine in query analyzer, but when I add it to my stored procedure I receive an error 156. How do I work around this?
select distinct(dateposted)
from billingprocedures bp1,
billingprocedureordercomponentvalues bpocv,
ordercomponentvalues ocv
where bp1.billingid = @billingid
and bp1.procedureid = bpocv.billingprocedureid
and bpocv.ordercomponentvalueid = ocv.ordercomponentvalueid
Thanks,
Bryan
Stored Procedures-date Time Format
Apr 25, 2001Hi
I have many existing tables within my db with the date format mm/dd/yyyy
Is it possible to run a stored procedure in order to convert the EXISTING records to the date format dd/mm/yyyy?
Thanks
Addicted To Stored Procedures: A Time Series Problem. Is It Possible?
Oct 31, 2006It's been about two weeks since I first began using SQL Stored procedures and now I am thinking already about changing many of my plans and doing those operations in them. There is a problem I want to address and see if it is possible to accomplish it in SQL Server instead of the client C# code.
I have a time series. In simplified presentation it is a table of two columns. The first one is float, the second is DateTime. There might be quite a few rows in the table:
A1 ... DT1
A2 ... DT2
................
An.... DTn
What I need to do is to find patters among A1,A2,....An elements. They vary in magnitude in a rather random order. They constitute what some would call a Markov chain. I demonstrate what I want in a couple of real life examples that I would not have a problem to run in my C# code at all.
(1) element Ak may be only 90% of the element in the previous row Ak-1. I want to catch it. I want to get the DateTime stamp when it happened. The next step is: I want to go down the chain of rows and find the element Am which rebounds to the magnitude of the element Ak. In other words Am==Ak. I want to remember its DateTime stamp.Then I want to find all elements in the chain of rows that follow the same pattern.
How can I do it in SQL language? Is it possible? I've been thinking about creating a bunch of temporary tables with rows shifted up by one and and destroying them after a pattern has been found in the same rows of many tables.
(2) I want to collect a distribution of many such patterns and analyze then in C# code but the elementary block is the operation I described in point (1). If I could get a cue as to how to go about it I could figure out the rest, I hope.
I learn by examples, by looking at code samples. So far I haven't seen anything that fits this task. If anyone could send me in such direction it would be great. Most of the things I've seen is "SELECT FROM CUSTOMERS," etc.
A somewhat related question. Years ago I stumbled in MSN help on a set of Math routines (they could have been part of a class) that were designed specifically for analyzing patters. It is not the Math class, I have looked into it. It is something different. I cannot find them now. I did not save a bookmark back then.
Does anyone know what I am talking about: math functions for time series analysis?
Thanks.
Execution Time Anomaly In Stored Procedures In SQL Server 2005
Dec 3, 2006Background: We have SQL Server 2005 x64 running on a quad-core (dual dual-core) machine with 16GB of RAM. The database is about 10GB in size and we execute around a million stored procedures a day on it. Our application uses about 1000 different stored procedures on this machine. The application is a transactional B2B web-app with about 2000 users.
The problem we have is a really odd one that I can't seem to find much information on. We have a small number (3-4) of stored procedures that's exibiting this problem.
The stored proc in question takes on average 100ms CPU time to execute. It's a fairly complex stored proc, about 300 lines long, 6-7 select statements and it uses temp tables. No updates / inserts except for on the temp tables. It's executed about 5000 times per day. About once a week, though, execution times will suddenly jump up to 3000 ms average. This happens randomly during the day, although it seems to happen more often on Monday mornings (the DB is mostly unutilized over the weekend)
To fix this, I force the DB to recalculate the execution plan by adding / removing (depending what I did last time around) the line 'set arithabort on' at the top of the stored procedure. I have no idea why this works, but it does. Within seconds of changing it, the stored proc execution time will go back to it's normal range of 60-150ms.
I've tried setting the execution plan of the stored procedure but I can't get it to work - the execution plan is very long and I don't know how to debug the error I get.
What is happening? This happens with a couple of stored procedures - usually the more complex ones. Has anyone seen anything like this?
Is Logging The Execution Time Of Stored Procedures With Standard Settings Possible?
Oct 13, 2005Dear group,is it possible in SQL-Server to see when a stored procedure wasexecuted ?I would say it is only possible with some traces but not with thestandard settings.For a short answer on that matter i'd be thankful.RegardsUli
View 4 Replies View RelatedForce SQL Server To Recompile Stored Procedures Every Time They Run (SQL Server 7/2000)
Apr 27, 2005This is a solution for a very specific problem, and it's one that you'll hardly ever use, but it's important to know about that one scenario where it can save your neck. Ordinarily, stored procedures are only recompiled if they're no longer in the procedure cache. But if a stored procedure's execution plan is still in the cache, then SQL Server reuses the compiled storedprocedure and its existing execution plan. This is almost always the best course of action. Almost always, but not always.Sometimes, however, reusing an existing plan doesn't offer the most efficient performance. Imagine, for example, that your stored procedure accepts a parameter that determines the natureof a JOIN operation. The results can vary in a big way, so you wouldn't want your procedure to be locked into an execution plan that might be completely inappropriate for that JOIN. In a highlyspecialized case like this, you might want to force SQL Server to recompile the procedure every time the procedure runs. Doing so comes at a performance cost, but this might be offset by thesavings you gain in not executing the procedure with an awful compiled execution plan. Consider carefully whether to use this approach (or whether to re-engineer the over-design of yourapplication to avoid this situation in the first place). Should you need to instruct SQL Server to recompile each time, add the WITH RECOMPILE directive to the procedure, like this: CREATE PROCEDURE ProcName @Param int /* ... other parameters */ WITH RECOMPILE AS /* ... procedure code follows */
If we omit "WITH RECOMPILE", what will be the consequence? Thanks
Oracle Stored Procedures VERSUS SQL Server Stored Procedures
Jul 23, 2005I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies View RelatedStored Procedures 2005 Vs Stored Procedures 2000
Sep 30, 2006Hi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
Script Tasks Not Pre-compiling All Of A Sudden
Aug 6, 2007I've been building and running script tasks for years without issue. Then all of sudden last week Visual Studio starts showing the "Task is configured to pre-compile the script, but binary code is not found" error anytime I open a script -- even I make no changes. If I copy the dtsx package to another machine, the script compiles fine and I can see the binary data in the raw .dtx file -- so I know the code is correct.
I can also reproduce the error simply by adding a new script task, going into "Design Script", make no changes to the default code (which is basically one line: Dts.TaskResult = Dts.Results.Success) and simply press "OK" on the Script Task Editor.
I've been trying to find some VS setting somewhere that might stop the script IDE from producing the binary code, but I can't. It doesn't seem to be project setting, because all my SSIS projects are now suffering this problem on my main dev box.
Anyone experience this?
Newbie: Compiling A DTSx Package
May 16, 2006I have now created a few simple SSIS packages. In BIDS I right-clicked on a solution and selected "Build". I went to the "bin" directory hoping to find a standalone ".exe.dll" file but found only a ".dtsx' file.
Can BIDS can actually build a standalone exedll or is the .dtsx file all that's available? (If so, I guess that another program is expected to invoke the .dtsx file.)
TIA,
barker
All My Stored Procedures Are Getting Created As System Procedures!
Nov 6, 2007
Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.
For example, even this simple little guy:
CREATE PROCEDURE BOB
AS
PRINT 'BOB'
GO
Gets created as a system stored procedure.
Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?
Thanks,
Jason
SQL Server 2014 :: Gathering Stored Procedure Execution Time In Real Time?
Jun 11, 2015Is there a way to keep track in real time on how long a stored procedure is running for? So what I want to do is fire off a trace in a stored procedure if that stored procedure is running for over like 5 minutes.
View 5 Replies View RelatedHow To Search And List All Stored Procs In My Database. I Can Do This For Tables, But Need To Figure Out How To Do It For Stored Procedures
Apr 29, 2008How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
Using A Stored Procedure To Query Other Stored Procedures And Then Return The Results
Jun 13, 2007Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID, S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName', T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails I INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow To Save Stored Procedure To NON System Stored Procedures - Or My Database
May 13, 2008Greetings:
I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.
How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?
Thanks!
Stored Procedure Being Saved In System Stored Procedures
Apr 7, 2006We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.
For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.
I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.
What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?
Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?
Thanks!
How Can I Call One Or More Stored Procedures Into Perticular One Stored Proc ?
Apr 23, 2008Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?
How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.
SSIS And Stored Procedures Results Stored In #Tables
Mar 26, 2008Hello
I'm start to work with SSIS.
We have a lot (many hundreds) of old (SQL Server2000) procedures on SQL 2005.
Most of the Stored Procedures ends with the following commands:
SET @SQLSTRING = 'SELECT * INTO ' + @OutputTableName + ' FROM #RESULTTABLE'
EXEC @RETVAL = sp_executeSQL @SQLSTRING
How can I use SSIS to move the complete #RESULTTABLE to Excel or to a Flat File? (e.g. as a *.csv -File)
I found a way but I think i'ts only a workaround:
1. Write the #Resulttable to DB (changed Prozedure)
2. create data flow task (ole DB Source - Data Conversion - Excel Destination)
Does anyone know a better way to transfer the #RESULTTABLE to Excel or Flat file?
Thanks for an early Answer
Chaepp
MS SQL Stored Procedures Inside Another Stored Procedure
Jun 16, 2007Hi,
Do you know how to write stored procedures inside another stored procedure in MS SQL.
Create procedure spMyProc inputData varchar(50)
AS
----- some logical
procedure spMyProc inputInsideData varchar(10)
AS
--- some logical
--- go
-------
Calling Stored Procedures From Another Stored Procedure
May 8, 2008I am writing a set of store procedures (around 30), most of them require the same basic logic to get an ID, I was thinking to add this logic into an stored procedure.
The question is: Would calling an stored procedure from within an stored procedure affect performance? I mean, would it need to create a separate db connection? am I better off copying and pasting the logic into all the store procedures (in terms of performance)?
Thanks in advance
John
Calling A Stored Procedure Inside Another Stored Procedure (or Nested Stored Procedures)
Nov 1, 2007Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly. For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie
exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created'
returns an int value as 1
(performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created')
but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie:
exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1'
which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc):
SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example).
My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert).
Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
Only Functions And Extended Stored Procedures Can Be Executed From Within A Function. Sp_executesql Is A Extended Stored Prod
May 15, 2008i have created the folowing function but keep geting an error.
Only functions and extended stored procedures can be executed from within a function.
Why am i getting this error!
Create Function myDateAdd
(@buildd nvarchar(4), @avdate as nvarchar(25))
Returns nvarchar(25)
as
Begin
declare @ret nvarchar(25)
declare @sqlval as nvarchar(3000)
set @sqlval = 'select ''@ret'' = max(realday) from (
select top '+ @buildd +' realday from v_caltable where realday >= '''+ @avdate +''' and prod = 1 )a'
execute sp_executesql @sqlval
return @ret
end
Stored Procedures
Jun 17, 2006hi
i need to use only one stored procedure and access many tablesso how write a stored procedure for that dohelp me looking forward for a reply to the earliest i am developing web page using asp.net using c# and sqlserver as backend
looking forward for a replygayathri
Stored Procedures
Dec 15, 2006I am interested to know about stored procedures in Mssql .Can anyone please help me out.
Thanx in advance.
Help With Stored Procedures
Feb 24, 2007Hello I have two stored procedures
@ID INT
AS
SELECT (CASE WHEN NUM >= 10 THEN CAST(PAID AS FLOAT) / CAST(NUM AS FLOAT) * 100 WHEN NUM < 10 THEN 0 END) AS PER
FROM (SELECT (SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
FROM Event_data AS D LEFT OUTER JOIN
Events AS E ON E.id = D.Event_id
WHERE (D.Transaction_type = 1) AND (D.Player_id = @ID)) AS NUM,
(SELECT COUNT(*) AS Expr1
FROM Event_data AS D LEFT OUTER JOIN
Events AS E ON E.id = D.Event_id
WHERE (D.Transaction_type = 1) AND (D.Transaction_value > 0) AND (D.Player_id = @ID)) AS PAID) AS X
and
@ID INT
AS
SELECT P.*,'/' + DBO.GETCHIPFOLDER(@ID) + '/' + ISNULL(P.PHOTO,'BLANK.GIF') AS PIC,ISNULL(
(SELECT SUM(TRANSACTION_VALUE)
FROM EVENT_DATA WHERE PLAYER_ID=@ID AND TRANSACTION_TYPE=1
GROUP BY PLAYER_ID),0) AS WINNINGS FROM PLAYERS P
undefined P
The first returns a percentage for player wins, the second gives me a photo and sums the player winnings
I would like to combine the results so I can get the percentage and wininngs in one query, in another matter all together I would like create a procedure like the first but instead of returning only one player, I would like to return the percentage for each player
Thanks in advance for any light you can shine on this.
Stored Procedures
Feb 25, 2007I have a question about stored procedures, Is it better to use stored procedures even if I only use it once at my site? Or is it better to write the sql-part directly in the sqldatasource?
And am I forced to create two different stored procedures even if they are exactly the same except the "Where-part"?
Now I have around 40 stored procedures, and quite many of them looks the same except the where-part...
(Iam just a beginner with SQL)
Stored Procedures
May 2, 2007Hello every one,
I m working in aspx 2.0 with sql server 2005, please tell me how can I create Stored Procedures for two or more tables not a single table(select,insert,update,delete please send me the queries which can help me in easy way I will very thankful to you
Thank you
Help On Stored Procedures
Jun 19, 2007I am learning to make a ASP web site and feel that if i can do it the harder way using some stored procedures instead of using multiple datasources on each page requiring that it might be better. So i am wondering what are these used for:DECLARE vs just entering "@param1 varchar(30)"When i use "DECLARE @rc int" i get the error "Incorrect syntax near DECLARE"How to return values to ASP page in Visual Studio 2005 How to use @@rowcount - doesn't seem to work for me?i tried using DECLARE @rc intSET @rc = @@rowcountWhen to use GO, BEGIN etcIf i want to use the variable only in the procedure, and not needed to be inputed, do i need to put it in the CREATE PROCEDURE (section)?Should i use my own stored procedures or VS2005 created ones using datasources? not really procedures but SQL, in SQL can i do like IF ELSE? if i use my own i cant use the Optimistic Concurrency right? and whats that?
View 1 Replies View RelatedStored Procedures
Jul 5, 2007Is there a website or somewhere i can go to read up on stored procedures??
View 2 Replies View Related