I have a sp which requires a somewhat(at least for me) where clause. It needs a standard clause but then needs to differentiate the where based on whether a certain field is null or not. I didn't think an if would work but neither is my case. Below is the where clause. Thanks
where(OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RESTRICTION1 in
('Dental hold', 'Medical hold', 'Mental health hold')
AND
case when OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO is not null
then
OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1FROM <=@sdate AND
OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO >= @edate
when OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1TO is null
OTHER_ORDER_DATES_.DF_RES1FROM <=@edate
I have web forms with about 10-15 optional search parameters (fields) for a give table. Each item (textbox) in the form is treated as an AND condition.
Right now I build complex WHERE clauses based on wheather data is present in a textbox and AND each one in the clause. Also, if a particular field is "match any word", i get a ANDed set of OR's. As you can imagine, the WHERE clause gets quite large.
I build clauses like this (i.e., 4 fields shown):
SELECT * from tableName WHERE (aaa like '%data') AND (bbb = 'data') AND (ccc like 'data%') AND ( (xxx like '%data') OR (yyy like '%data%') )
My question is, are stored procedures better for building such dynamic SQL clauses? I may have one field or all fifteen. I've written generic code for building the clauses, but I don't know much about stored procedures and am wondering if I'm making this more difficult on myself.
I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?
I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....
I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.
Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?
Hi, can anyone shed some light on this issue?SELECT Status from lupStatuswith a normal query it returns the correct recordcountSELECT Status from lupStatus GROUP BY Statusbut with a GROUP By clause or DISTINCT clause it return the recordcount= -1
ON dbo.Track_ID.SM_ID = dbo.transactions.sm_session_id
GROUP BY dbo.Track_ID.TrackID
)
) Once moved to SQL Server 2005 the statement would not return and showed SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD to be the waittype when executed. This machine is SP1 and needs to be upgraded to SP2, something that is not going to happen near time.
I changed the SQL to the following, SQL Server now runs it in under a second, but now the app is not functioning correctly. Are the above and the following semantically the same?
UPDATE dbo.Track_ID
SET dbo.Track_ID.Processed = 4 --Regular 1 leg call thats been completed
1) Rows ordered using textual id rather than numeric id
Code Snippet select cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id from ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) v order by v.id
Result set is ordered as: 1, 11, 2 I expect: 1,2,11
if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
2) SQL server reject query below with next message
Server: Msg 169, Level 15, State 3, Line 16 A column has been specified more than once in the order by list. Columns in the order by list must be unique.
Code Snippet select cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id from ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) v cross join ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) u order by v.id ,u.id
Again, if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
It reproducible on
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May 3 2005 23:18:38 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
and
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86) Feb 9 2007 22:47:07 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
In both cases database collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1251_CS_AS
If I check quieries above on database with SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS collation then it works fine again.
Could someone clarify - is it bug or expected behaviour?
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
what is differance between conditions put in ON clause and in WHERE clause in JOINS????
see conditions that shown in brown color
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate, d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2 on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID AND d1.ListType = d2.ListType AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null) AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null) whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND (d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL) OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL) )
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate, d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2 on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitIDAND d1.ListType = d2.ListType AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null) AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null) whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND (d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL) OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL) )
another thing...
if we put AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitID condition in second query then shall we remove d1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID from WHERE clause????
Hi everyone, I saw some queries where SQL inner join clause and the where clause is used at the same time. I knew that "on" is used instead of the "where" clause. Would anyone please exaplin me why both "where" and "on" clause is used in some sql Select queries ?
I need some help on how to structure a sql statement. I am creating a membership directory and I need the stored procedure to output the Last Name, First Name (and if married) Spouse First Name. Like this Flinstone, Fred & Wilma All members are in one directory linked by two fields. [Family ID] all the family members have the same family id and then there is a Family position id that shows if they are the Husband, Wife or Kids. I have no problem with this part select (LastName + ',' + FirstName) as Name, [Phone 1] as Phone, [Unit Name] as WD, [Street 1] as Street, SUBSTRING(City,1,3) as City, SUBSTRING(Postal,1,5) as Zipfrom Membership Where [HH Order]=1 Order By LastName ASC Could someone help me on how to display the " & Spouse FirstName " as part of the name field only if there is a spouse [HH Order]=2 for the current [Family ID]????
I need to get multiple values for each row in a database, then do a calculation and insert the calculation and the accountnumber related to the calculation the data, into a different column. I get an error trying it this way...there is no real identifier, it is jsut something that needs to get done per row...any ideas on how I can accomplish this? Declare @NetCommission decimal Declare @AccountNumber varchar(50) Set @NetCommission = (select (CommissionRebate * Quantity) from Account A Join Trades T on A.AccountNumber = T.AccountNumber) Set @AccountNumber = (select A.AccountNumber from cmsAccount A Join Trades T on A.AccountNumber = T.AccountNumber)
Hello, could someone help with this query in a stored proc.? SET @SQL = 'SET ''' + @avgwgt + ''' = ' '(SELECT AVG(AverageWeight) FROM CageFishHistory where CageID IN (' + @cagearray + ') and ItemDate =''' + CONVERT(varchar(23),@startdate) + ''')' EXEC @SQL I'm trying to get an average value across dynamically selected rows. (I'm using a list array to deliver the selection to the stored proc). I need to re-use the average value within the procedure,so it's not enough to output it as a column of the resultset - EG. 'Select AVG(AverageWeight) as AvgWgt' . If I take out the @avgwgt line it works fine, but otherwise I'm getting this error: "Incorrect syntax near '(SELECT AVG(AverageWeight) FROM CageFishHistory where CageID IN ('." It may be that I can access a column of the resultset in the rest of the procedure, and that would help avoid the use of pesky apostrophes, but I don't know how to do it.
I'm sure there is a way of cracking this, but I can't think of a good solution. Right now I am not happy with the solutions I come up with, one of which takes 4 minutes to run on SQL Server The scenario: User is presented with search page where one or more search terms can be entered/selected. There are no required parameters. It can be any or all of the possibilities presented. Below is a model of the search parameters presented. The user will either select to show more options under Profile ABC, or go down to Profile STU or Profile XYZ to show more options, or even select all Profiles and then select from Type 1 and either a. or. b. or. c. or ALL of the above. I cannot predict what a user will make part of the search query so I have to have a stored procedure ready which can handle any or all of the parameters a user may select. Am I biting off more than I can chew (it seems so)? Or is there an elegant way of handling the unknown combination of search parameters that a user might throw into my sql query? I'm running this under ASP 1.0 and SQL Server 2000.
[check to show the options below] Profile ABC [check to shore more options] Type 1
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to show more options] Type 2
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to show more options] Type 3
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes
B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to select more options] Type 4
A. Contains fields for entering another data string and selecting from drop-down boxes B. ditto C. ditto D. ditto [check to show more options] Profile XYZ (as above) [check to select more options] Profile STU (as above)
I'm working on a system that used to load control dynamically into a table structure based on "Row" and "Column" properties in the item object. The system is now being revamped, and instead of a table structure, it's being loaded into a list, which will be controled by css. The new relevant variables are "Sequence" and "Width." Since there are already thousands of existing items in the database, I have to write a script that can take a really good guess at legacy items' Row and Col, and input values for Sequence and Width. Since all items exist on "tabs," I can query for all items on a given tabID, Ordered By Row, Col -- that will give me a sequence. Width isn't literal, it has 6 presets: Whole, Half, Third, Quarter, Two Thirds, Three Quarters, represented in the table as 0,1,2,3,4,5 -- for our purposes, I'll assume that all items on a row are equal in width. We can determine width by figuring out the number of items within the same row, so if there is only one in the row, it's a Whole (0), if there are three in the row it'll be a Third (2), etc.
I'd like to create a query that gets all items by tab, assigns the appropriate sequence, and figures out how many items are in the row with a given item, to assign the correct width.... but I have no idea how to make t-sql do that. I don't mind multiple queries to get the whole process done, and it doesn't need to be efficient -- this is a one-off script to run to give legacy items values that we can work with. Where would I start?
HI. I have 3 tables 1- std with : stdID , programID. 2- Programs with :ProgramID , Cost 3 - Movements with : stdID , balance. the first table contain the stdID and ProgramID , some times the std hasn't programID that mean he hasn't programID. then we return null. if the std has programID there is to cases. the first one he have a movement on his balance then we get the biggest balance for the std. the second case he hasn't any moventen then we get his balance from Programs table by the ProgramID .
I need sql server function that return table like this stdID , Balance that means every std with his Balance. Regards.
This is too complex anyone know how to make it less complex. I am trying to get all the selected fields from contacts into a datagrid where the other fields contain a string in textbox1. This works SELECT [company], [contactname], [emailaddress], [secondemailaddress], [phonenumber], [webpage] FROM [contacts] WHERE (([AB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([AL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%')) When i add all the rest of the fields it says its too complex. Please Help
SELECT [company], [contactname], [emailaddress], [secondemailaddress], [phonenumber], [webpage] FROM [contacts] WHERE (([AB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([AL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([B] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([BT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CF] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ( LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([CW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([DY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([E] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EC] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([EX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([FK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([FY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([G] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([GY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ( LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([HX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([IV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([JE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KT] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([KY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([L] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([LU] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([M] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ME] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([MK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ML] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([N] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([NW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([OL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([OX] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([PR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RH] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([RM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([S] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SE] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SG] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SK] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SL] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SM] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SP] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([ST] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([SY] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TF] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TQ] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([TW] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([UB] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([W] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WA] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WC] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WD] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WN] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WR] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WS] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([WV] LIKE '%' + ? + '%') AND ([YO] LIKE '%' + ? + '%'))
hi how are you please help me in my problem which i can't make it. Now, i have a project in ASP.NET and SQL Server 2005. let's call the project an image gallery, in my project i have a table named "Category" in which all the categories are in this table. also while adding a new category a new table will be created automatically with the name of that category. now, what i want is that to build a query that reads the contents of the tables that the tables name are the names of the each record in the "Category" table. is that possible ? please if any one help can me in my problem.
I have 2 tables, say table1, and table2. There is a DocID (primary key) in table1. In table2, DocID is the foriegn key. There can be more than 1 DocID.
how do I join these two tables, such that I get all the otherID's for each DocID. ie., DocID OtherID 1 2 and 10 and 13 and 25 2 3
i am writing this query to display search results on a search page (with keyword search) and so, if I display the result in more than one row, then the user might think that there is more than document...whereas the case is that there is only one document with more than one other ID's.
is there any way I can do this? display...more than 1otherID in the same row for the same DociD? Currently, I am using a left outer join of table1 and table2.
I cant get "order by" to work in this sql query..I use this query: "SELECT DISTINCT TOP 12 name,total = COUNT(*) FROM products where kat = 'music' group by namn"and I want to add this some where to get 12 random records: "ORDER BY NewID()"I tried this: "SELECT DISTINCT TOP 12 name,total = COUNT(*) FROM products where kat = 'music' group by namn ORDER BY NewID()"" but get the error:"ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified"I can´t figure out how I should write the query..Somebody have any ideas??/Radiwoi
table_a has patient_id, tran_id and other fields a,b,c table_b has patient_id,tran_id, key_id and other fileds d,e,f table_a patien_id + tran_id is unique table_b patient_id + tran_id is not unique, could be duplicated.
I have to create a query which will retrieve fields from table a a,b,c and fields d,e from table b where table a. patient_id + tran_id = tableb.patient_id + tran_id and table_b.key_id is the min key_id for that patient_id + tran_id.
ID GroupID User 1 101 Tom 2 101 Mark 3 101 Clark 4 102 Tom 5 102 Mark 6 103 Tom 7 103 Clark 8 104 Tom 9 104 Clark 10 105 Tom 11 105 Bred
the users of Group 101 are Tom,Mark,Clark the users of Group 102 are Tom,Mark the users of Group 103 are Tom,Clark the users of Group 104 are Tom,Clark the users of Group 105 are Tom,Bred
I want to show Tom that
Both You and Clark are together in 3 groups Both You and Mark are together in 2 groups Both You and Bred are together in 1 group
I might have to redesign the tables for this, but I'll ask anyway. I have a table with the following fields:
Email - VarChar Seminar - Int PeckingOrder - Int.
As I add addresses to the table, each one has a Seminar, and then each Seminar has a Pecking Order Value. If an email address shows up for more than one seminar, it can have multiple records. IE:
for address, seminar, and pecking order would be sample entries into the table. Give or Take 1000 records in the table at any given time. What I want to pull out is:
Distinct Email Addresses For each Email Address - The Max(PeckingOrder) And the Seminar that's associated with Max(PeckingOrder)
For the sample data set above, I'd want to see these two records returned by the query:
email1 - 1523 - 424 email2 - 1524 - 235
I can't seem to get the Having / Where clause right to pull those two records properly. Anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks, --Daniel
Edited - Didn't realize the BB removed email addresses.
i want to write a query that takes any one specific person's schedule for an entire specific day, adds an arbitrary number of days to datStartTime, and finally inserts the PKSlotINDEX corresponding to the calcultated StartTime and fkPersonINDEX.
wow complicated isnt it...
the goal is to take the schedule of one day for one person and copy it to another day; i can scrap my current layout if necessary.
SELECT goto_last_name as 'Manager', advisor_name, advisor_ao_number as 'AO', COUNT (CASE advisor_termination_date WHEN '<Null>' THEN 1 END) as '#Advisors', SUM(Weekly_TOS_GDC) as 'TOS GDC' FROM weekly_condensed_tb WHERE advisor_platform_number = 1 AND report_date BETWEEN CAST(CONVERT(VARCHAR,'9/11/2007',112) AS DATETIME) -28 AND CAST(CONVERT(VARCHAR,'9/11/2007',112) AS DATETIME) GROUP BY goto_last_name,advisor_ao_number,advisor_name HAVING COUNT (CASE advisor_termination_date WHEN '<Null>' THEN 1 END) > 1
In the query above i select a range from the date - 28 days and do a sum on the TOS GDC column. What i am trying to do is have another query where the range will be - 56 and maybe - 86 so i get the SUMS for that as well. I need to display this in SQL Reporting Services and i can only have one DataSet returned otherwise i will not be able to bind it to one table.
How can i go about this so i return one set of data for 3 different date ranges.
Hey all, I have 3 tables: 1 table with Module information (1 quiz-like part of an Exam), 1 table with the relationships between Modules and Exams (ratios) and 1 table with User information, that contains the Exam number, Module number, and score. I am trying to get a full list of modules' names for 1 exam, and the user's score for those modules they taken. All this would pertain to 1 single Exam. I am only getting records returned for those modules that the user has taken; I want the full list with NULL values for the scores of modules the user has not taken. Hope that made sense, here is my attempt:
Code:
SELECT ExamModules.Name, ExamUsers.Score FROM ExamToModule LEFT OUTER JOIN ExamModules ON ExamToModule.ModuleID = ExamModules.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN ExamUsers ON ExamToModule.ModuleID = ExamUsers.MID AND ExamToModule.ExamID = ExamUsers.EID WHERE (ExamToModule.ExamID = 1) AND (ExamUsers.UserName = 'dizzle')
In this case the user is Dizzle and the Exam's ID (primary key) is 1. I've changed LEFT to RIGHT and FULL, they all return the same few records. Help?
