New to using MS SQL server! I have a requirements DB. Before I came on board, the DB was seeded with requirements text and a requirements ID in separate columns. I've been asked to append the ID in front of the text:
Text - The user shall be able.... ID - 1.01.01. Combined - 1.01.01.The user shall be able....
I've created the following query that displays the columns:
CREATE VIEW dbo.ReqID AS SELECT RQREQUIREMENTS.ID, RQREQUIREMENTS.REQUIREMENTNAME, RQUSERDEFINEDFIELDVALUES.FIELDVALUE
FROM RQREQUIREMENTS LEFT OUTER JOIN RQUSERDEFINEDFIELDVALUES ON RQREQUIREMENTS.ID = RQUSERDEFINEDFIELDVALUES.REQUIREMENTID
WHERE (RQUSERDEFINEDFIELDVALUES.FIELDID = 171)
The Text field is REQUIREMENTNAME The ReqId is FIELDVALUE
Should I create an UPDATE query based on this SELECT, updating the REQUIREMENTNAME column with FIELDVALUE + REQUIREMENTNAME?
Hi all, I am creating a search table where the keywords field is madeup of several text fields and this is causing me some problems. I canconcatentate the text ok but i can't seem to concatenate matchingrecords here is the cursor loop. I'm not a fan of cursors but alsodidn't see another way of achieving this.declare @ptr1 varbinary(16)declare @Ptr2 varbinary(16)declare @profileid intdeclare @x intset @profileid = 0while @profileid is not nullbeginselect@profileid = min([id]),@ptr1 = MIN(textptr(text1))from #holdingwhere [id] @profileiddeclare c2 cursor fast_forward forselect textptr(searchterms), datalength(searchterms)from searchwhere search.[id] = @profileidopen c2fetch c2 into @ptr2, @xwhile @@fetch_status = 0beginupdatetext search.searchterms @ptr2 null 0 #holding.text1 @ptr1fetch c2 into @ptr2, @xendclose c2deallocate c2endThe #holding table contains the fields that i want to concatenate andthe search table is the resulting table. This example would loopthrough search and find id 1 in search and then append another fieldmatching id 1 in holding then move onto the next field in turn goingthrough the whole table.i.e.search holding result after each loopid text id text1 abc 1 def abcdef2 ghi 2 jkl ghijklWhen I run this, some of the records concatenate properly but most dontwith the same text being appended to the end of searchterms. i.e loadsof results will end up with jkl tagged onto the end. I can't figure outwhen my loop is falliing over!!! Can anyone help?Dan
I have followed many tutorials on selecting and replacing text in text fields, varchar fields and char fields, but I have yet to find a single script that will to all 3 based on field type. Let's assume for a moment that I don't know where all in my database a certain value that I need changed resides ... i.e., the data's tablename and fieldname. How would I go about doing the following ... or more importantly, is this even possible in a SQL only procedure?1) Loop over entire database and get all user tables2) Loop over all user tables and get all fields3) Loop over all fields and determine the field type4) switch between field types and change a string of text from 'a' to 'b'Please be gentle, I'm a procedure newb.
Hi, I'm trying to improve performance for a db that stores messages. The message is currently stored in an ntext field, but when I look at all the records from the past 3 months, I found that 88% are less than 1000 characters, and 97% are less than 3000 characters. I don't want to actually limit the message size, but it seems like I might get much better performance using a varchar(3000) field to hold most of the messages, and a separate text field just used for those 3% that really are long. Is this a good idea? If so, is it better to put the Message and LongMessage fields in the same table; or, have a separate table to hold the long messages? If it is in a separate table, it would need to be left joined with the message table each time messages are retrieved.Also -- I am getting about 700 new messages daily, and right now have over 150,000 messages stored. The vast majority of activity involves new messages. Is this a good situation to look at using horizontal partitioning?Thanks for any help, I don't really have anyone to discuss this with and it is really helpful to get some other views!!
Hi all. I have been going round and round for the past 2 days on this and would appreciate any help. In a view select statement, I need to concat 2 varchar fields with a text field. If I CONVERT the TEXT field to VARCHAR, only the first 30 characters of the field appear in the result set. If I convert the VARCHAR fields to TEXT, I get an error that I cannot CONCAT TEXT fields. I'm not sure what to do. Can someone please offer some assistance? Thanks in advance! Steve
tbl_Projects ------------------------- ProjID | Description ------------------------- 1 | First 2 | Second 3 | Third
I want to write a SELECT statement that will output in this format: 1 - First 2 - Second etc...
I've tried these two statements:
SELECT (ProjID + ' - ' + Description) AS Projects FROM tbl_Projects //Error: Conversion failed when converting the varchar value 'First' to data type int.
and
SELECT CONCAT(ProjID, CONCAT(' - ', Description)) AS Projects FROM tbl_Projects //Error: The data types int and varchar are incompatible in the concat operator.
Is there any way to concatenate an int value with a varchar value?
Is there any way of concatenating 2 fields and a seperator, an id (integer) then "|||" then a nvarchar field, it would make my life much easier if I could come up with SQL that works in ms access as well as sql server.. Thanks
I've got a fairly standard query that does a group by a type column, and then sums the lengths of a VARCHAR column. I'd like to add into that a concatenated version of the string always concatenating in primary key order. Is that possible?
Hi , I am trying to write a stored procedure (i have given it below).i am basically trying to join 4 strings into one based on some if conditions.But the result gives only the intially assaigned string and rest are not getting concatenated.i have provided teh stored procedure below along with the inputs and result i got.Can anyone Please help me to acheive this set ANSI_NULLS ONset QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONgoALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[TestSearch] @distributorId int, @locationId int, @orderTypeId int, @fromDate Datetime = NULL, @toDate Datetime = NULL, @OrderStatus varchar(500) = NULL, @TaxAuthority varchar(500) = NULL, @TaxStampType varchar(500) = NULLASBEGINDeclare @SQL varchar(8000)Set @SQL ='select * from Orders AS a INNER JOINOrderLines AS b ON a.Id = b.FkOrder INNER JOINTaxStampTypes AS c ON b.FkTaxStampType = c.Id where ''' +CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),@fromDate ,1) + ''' <= CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),a.OrderDate ,1) and ''' +CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),@toDate ,1) + '''>= CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), a.OrderDate,1)and a.fkordertype = '+ convert(varchar(1),@orderTypeId) +'anda.FkDistributor = ('+ convert(varchar(50), @distributorId)+',a.FkDistributor)anda.FkLocation in ('+convert(varchar(10),@locationId)+',a.FkLocation)and'IF(@OrderStatus != null)Beginset @SQL= @SQL + 'a.FkOrderState in ('+ @OrderStatus +') and' EndIF(@TaxAuthority!= null)Beginset @SQL = @SQL +'a.FkTaxAuthority in ('+@TaxAuthority+') and'EndIF(@TaxStampType!= null)Beginset @SQL = @SQL + 'c.id in ('+ @TaxStampType+ ')and'End--Execute (@SQL1)select (@SQL);ENDHere is the Input Given to stored Procedure for executing:DECLARE @return_value intEXEC @return_value = [dbo].[TestSearch] @distributorId = 1002, @locationId = 3, @orderTypeId = 1, @fromDate = N'06/10/07', @toDate = N'10/10/07', @OrderStatus = N'2', @TaxAuthority = N'1000', @TaxStampType = N'1000'SELECT 'Return Value' = @return_valueHere Is The Output i get when I execute the stored procedure: select * from Orders AS a INNER JOIN OrderLines AS b ON a.Id = b.FkOrder INNER JOIN TaxStampTypes AS c ON b.FkTaxStampType = c.Id where '06/10/07' <= CONVERT(VARCHAR(8),a.OrderDate ,1) and '10/10/07'>= CONVERT(VARCHAR(8), a.OrderDate,1) and a.fkordertype = 1 and a.FkDistributor = (1002,a.FkDistributor) and a.FkLocation in (3,a.FkLocation) and--Ajay
I have a hierarchy of product categories and I want to string them together to show the complete path (breadcrumbs) to the item. Each category/subcat must be separated buy a comma. The catch is that not all items have the same number of cats/subcats. Here is what I am currently doing, but as you can see, this results in extra commas where the subcats are null.
Hello,I'm wondering if there is a way to concatenate two fields or a field and astring value in a single field in a view?Where in Access I might write;[field1] & " (m3)" as TotalVolumeis there a way to do this in an SQL Server View?Thanks!
Does anyone have code example on how to concatenate fields in a SQL Server stored procedure? I would like to create a stored procedure to concat (off_name ' ' off_fname ' ' off_prior) to a field to bound to a combobox. Thanks, Ron
I have a table where I need to concatenate all values into one field separated by a comma. If the field is null display a blank value. This is my table structure and example output
Create Table #read ( id int ,field1 varchar(100) ,field2 varchar(100) ,field3 varchar(100) ,field4 varchar(100)
I would like to concatenate text datatypes. Is this possible?? I'm using field1 + " " + field2 I cannot convert to varchar since the size is larger than 8000.
The following sql statement fails:SELECT IdFlight, OrganizerLastName + ", " + OrganizerFirstName + "Flt:" + FlightNumber As Concat FROM TableFlights Order ByOrganizerLastName, OrganizerFirstNameI'm trying to concatenate fields and words, but my asp.net page givesme an error saying " Flt:" is not a field.Thanks,Marvin
Hi, i'm trying to do a full text search on my site to add a weighting score to my results. I have the following database structure: Documents: - DocumentID (int, PK) - Title (varchar) - Content (text) - CategoryID (int, FK) Categories: - CategoryID (int, PK) - CategoryName (varchar) I need to create a full text index which searches the Title, Content and CategoryName fields. I figured since i needed to search the CategoryName field i would create an indexed view. I tried to execute the following query: CREATE VIEW vw_DocumentsWITH SCHEMABINDING ASSELECT dbo.Documents.DocumentID, dbo.Documents.Title, dbo.Documents.[Content], dbo.Documents.CategoryID, dbo.Categories.CategoryNameFROM dbo.Categories INNER JOIN dbo.Documents ON dbo.Categories.CategoryID = dbo.Documents.CategoryID GOCREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX vw_DocumentsIndexON vw_Documents(DocumentID) But this gave me the error: Cannot create index on view 'dbname.dbo.vw_Documents'. It contains text, ntext, image or xml columns. I tried converting the Content to a varchar(max) within my view but it still didn't like. Appreciate if someone can tell me how this can be done as surely what i'm trying to do is not ground breaking.
What are some good strategic approaches to using freeform text fields fordata that needs to be queried? We have a product whose tables we can'tchange, and I need to count on a "description" field for storing a value.Two, actually. I'm thinking of adopting this convention:InvoiceNumber@VendorAcronymThere'd be a lot of vendors.Additional issue: sometimes these values would be referred to in thedescription field, and I'd need to distinguish them as referrals ratherthan as original recorded instances of the values. For that, I imaginedeither:InvoiceNumber@@VendorAcronymorInvoiceNumber&VendorAcronymInvoiceNumber//VendorAcronymetc. -- something like that.I'm just wondering if there's best practice for doing anything this stupid(hey, I'm stuck with this as our only option just now; hopefully it's onlytemporary). How to parse out whatever I end up implementing -- well, itneeds to be tractable.Thoughts?--Scott
I am setting up a database that will receive a lot of data from twoseparate telephone centers, the log table will in a short time haveover 1 million lines, and I was wondering if I should use 1 identifyfield or two:case 1:[Id] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL[ServerId] [int] NOT NULLcase 2:[Id] [varchar(20)] IDENTITY NOT NULLWhere in case 1 I would just use a combination of Id and ServerId toidentify the line, where in case 2 I would have the Id field a varcharthat would look something like A-000001, A-000002 for server 1 andB-000001, B-000002 for server 2Which solution will be faster when searching for a record when thewill have over 1 million lines?
I have a varchar field which holds IDs like (1, 3, 5, 19, 23) when I order it, i get it ordered in ASCII order like (1, 19, 23, 3, 5) rather than (1, 3, 5, 19, 23) Even if I convert it to int, I won't be able to order it.
is there any way I can order a varchar field numerically?
Hi, I'm starting a new application in java using JTDS jdbc driver(http://jtds.sourceforge.net) and SQLServer 2005 Express.I have to design the database from scratch and my doubt is if I have to usevarchar or nvarchar fields to store string data.Any experience about performance issues using nvarchar instead of varchar(considering that Java internally works in unicode too)?Thanks in advance,Davide.
I have a data table in my project that has a "text" (not varchar) field in it. I am trying to load this field with little paragraphs of text for showing on my pages. How do I get the free text loaded into the table? The database explorer and all the data grid controls cut the text off at one line. There doesn't seem to be any way to get multiline text into this table.
I've two tables that I've made from some query subsets. Each table has a varchar field with notes/memos and I want to concatenate the fields into one long field.
The problem I'm running into is that when I run the query to check the concatenation, the field is truncated maybe 256 chars in.
I tried converting and casting the field as nvarchar 4000, and I've also done the same for the fields in the two tables, but that doesn't seem to help.
I can query for the fields from each table and none of them are truncated by themselves. It only happens after I concatenate them.
I've created a new table and inserted the results into it, but the field in it is also truncated.
1. Copy old data from each table in LiveDB to same table in ArchiveDB. 2. Delete the data from each table in LiveDB which is in ArchiveDB
Both DBs SIMPLE recovery mode.
Each table has a clustered PK on a single int value. In both DBs
The tables with varchar(max) columns are taking a v.long time to copy over.
IS there anything I can change in the ArchiveDB to make it run faster.
It is the insert that is taking the time. I've tried dropping the clustered PKs in ArchiveDB tables and then rebuilding afterwards but it has not made any difference. After all I am adding data to the ArchiveDB in clustered index order, so wouldn't have expected it to.
How I can change the Archive DB but cannot touch the schema/settings of Live DB.
I'm using SSIS to import data from a table (SQL) containing varchar fields. The problem is, that those varchar fields are changing over time (sometimes shrinking and sometimes expanding). I.e. from varchar(16) to varchar(20).
When I create my SSIS package, the package seem to store information about the length of each source-field. At runtime, if the field-length is larger then what the package expects an error is thown.
Is there anyway around this problem?
Oh, yeah... My destination fields are a lot wider then the source fields, so the problem is not that the varchar values doesn't fit in my destination table, but that the package expects the source to be smaller...
I have 2 varchar fields on MS 2005 table First field is date and format is 080118(YYMMDD) and second is salary field like 00002000(positive) and 00002000- (negative) how can I move them to date and numeric fields on another table....
Hi, i'm new to SSIS and trying to import some csv files (comma delimited) into SQL Server. A NULL value for a CHAR column is correctly regonized as NULl in SQL Server, but a NULL value for of a mapping to a VARCHAR column in SQL Server is not recognized correctly and i get the value "'NULL'" in SQL Server (including the single comma.
Sample:
CSV file contains columns A and B. A and B contains the Text NULL. Column A is mapped to a CHAR field, and column B is mapped to a VARCHAR field in SQL Server. After the import, SQL has the following value: A = NULL as NULL, B 'NULL' as text.
