I have a report that in most cases takes 4 parameters. In a few special cases, though, it takes 5 parameters. I have my code modified enough such that it can handle this exception, however I cannot figure out how to conditionally show the 5th parameter based on the 4th parameter. Is this possible?
View 3 RepliesI need to hide a row based on a value but show it for the rest of the values! this is the expression i am using for the first row is
=IIF(Fields!QuestionRef.Value = "1.2" or  "2.1" or "10.2" or "20.2" or "23.2" or "30.1",  true , false)
And for the second rowÂ
=IIF(Fields!QuestionRef.Value = "1.2" or  "2.1" or "10.2" or "20.2" or "23.2" or "30.1", true, false)
But it either hides the row for all values or shows it for all values.
I need to hide a column just for certain values from a table like contract decorators I tried using
=IIF(Fields!MainTrade.Value = "Contracts Decorator, Bricklayer", True, False)
But it just hid the column for all values, then i tried this but it doesn't seem to work (Think it's not correct though)
=IIF(Instr("Contracts Decorator, Bricklayer","," & Fields!MainTrade.Value & ",") > 0,true , false).
Below is the table and the highlighted column i am trying to hide just for those two fields. The table has a page break so that it would be displayed on a different page for each value, but i'm not sure it is possible as i have only done it for integers and rows before.
I have query which retrieves multiple column vary from 5 to 15 based on input parameter passed.I am using table to map all this column.If column is not retrieved in the dataset(I am not talking abt Null data but column is completely missing) then I want to hide it in my report.
Can I do that??
Any reply showing me the right way is appricited.
-Thanks,
Digs
Hello everyone,
I have a request to hide certain parameters in a report based on the current user logged into our web based report viewer using the ReportViewer control fo asp.net.
I am doing the standard stuff required to display the report as shown below.
Code Snippet
rptViewer.ServerReport.ReportServerUrl = new Uri("http://172.17.144.26/ReportServer"); // new Uri(MINETSecurity.WebSettings.WebServerPath, UriKind.Absolute);
rptViewer.ServerReport.ReportPath = ReportName;
rptViewer.ServerReport.DisplayName = "Report1";
rptViewer.ServerReport.ReportServerCredentials = new CustomReportCredentials("myUsername", "myPassword", "myDomain");
Now that i have loaded the report into the viewer i illiterate through the report parameters looking for the ones which the specified user should not see as show below.
Code Snippet
ReportParameterInfoCollection MyReportParams = rptViewer.ServerReport.GetParameters();
foreach (ReportParameterInfo MyParameter in MyReportParams)
{
// returns a value from a custom class which is a predefined value for this user based on the current user logged into the website
string Value = CustomParameterValues.ToString(GlobalUserSettings.CurrentUser.CustomValueList);
if(Value != "") MyParameter.PromptUser = false;
}
Here is where the promblem lies, when i try to set the value of PromptUser i get the following compiler error.
Property or indexer 'Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.ReportParameterInfo.PromptUser' cannot be assigned to -- its is read only
Is there anything i can do to set certain parameters invisible to the user and set there value myself. I know i could create 2 seperate reports and set the PromptUser value in the designer but i dont really want to be duplicating reports just to hide or show parameters.
I have tried using the SetParameters method of the ReportViewer component to pass the value of the parameters that should be hidden and even set the visible property to false, but it dosn't seem to work.
Any help here would be appreciated.
Cheers
Scott Blood
When I ran the report from the browser (not from the preview when designing the report), the parameters and the View Report button still displayed. I noticed clicking a double arrow button can hide or show the parameter section . How can I make hiding the parameter section as default? Currently showing the section is the default.
Thanks.
DanYeung
Greetings,
Is there a way to force the parameter input area to always show even when default values are specified? I want to always display the parameter area even when I set initial parameters.
Thanks
I am trying to get 3 report parameters working to show 3 different tables.
table 1 = Area 1 data
table 2 = Regional Area 1Â
table 3 = Stores in Regional Area 1
Currently I am working on the biggest one. E.g. if all 3 parameters have information in them, then you use table 3. I have written out the coding as the following
=iif(isnothing(Parameters!Area.Value),True, False ) and
iif(isnothing(Parameters!Regional.Value),True, False ) and
iif(isnothing(Parameters!store.Value),True,False)
But it errors stating end of statement expected. Â What I have missed or not done here?Â
I am having report parameter end date I am showing the default value "5/21/2007 11:59:59 PM" in the end date paramter. And also I want to show date time format "(MM/DD/YYYY HH:MMS)" in the right hand side of the parameter. How to do this?
Thank You
Hello what I'd like to display the following in a matrix report:
Parameter selected: 3 (March), 2008 (Year)
Monthly TO Summed up
ArtNo March <=March
1210 20,500 50,900
1220 21,200 64,000
1230 15,400 40,300
... ... ...
So, in the rows I have the articles and in the column the selected month via parameter. In another column I need to sum up all monthly values up to the selected month, meaning in this example the sum of jan, feb and mar per article.
This is probably a stupid question, but here goes: I am trying toupdate a table differently based on what is in one of the columnswithin the table. For example, I want to set Fld1 to be "On" if Fld2is "A", and I want to set Fld1 to be "Off" if Fld2 is "B". This iseasy to do in two SQL statements, but I was wondering if there's someway to do it in a single SQL statement. Thus far, I have had no luckin figuring out how to do this. Any ideas would be appreciated!!
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need some help aggregating values in a single table, where neither a simple Sum() nor a simple First() function will do... Would like to do Sum(First()) but that's not allowed!
Sample dataset (select * from cs_view):
Gender | Program | Student | Class_Section | Heads | Credits
------ | ------- | ------- | ------------- | ----- | -------
Female | English | Elena | Phys 101-b | 1 | 4
Female | English | Elena | Hist 101-c | 1 | 4
Female | English | Elena | Engl 101-a | 1 | 4
Female | English | Elena | Engl 105-b | 1 | 4
Male | History | Rich | Phys 105-a | 1 | 4
Male | History | Rich | Engl 101-c | 1 | 4
Male | History | Rich | Hist 101-b | 1 | 4
Male | History | Jacob | Phys 101-a | 1 | 4
Male | History | Jacob | Hist 101-b | 1 | 4
Male | History | Jacob | Engl 101-c | 1 | 4
Male | History | Jacob | Phys L-101-a | 1 | 0
Dataset has one row per student enrollment in class section. No trouble summing credits by student or by program (or gender). HOWEVER, aggregate head-count should add each student only once.
Desired table:
Gender Program Heads Credits
------ ------- ----- -------
Female English 1 16
Male History 2 24 - --- 3 40If I add a third grouping level, that is, add a student-level grouping to the desired table, First(Fields!Heads.Value) will return the correct student-level head count; however, I don't know how to sum up the student-level group header rows ('subtotal' rows), to aggregate head count by gender or by program.
Thanks for taking the time...
tom
Hi folks
I think this may be an increadibly simple one, but it's been driving me up the wall. I have a dataset that contains some summary information about a group of companies which i'd like to represent in a report. The dataset looks like this:
Company Lead_Type Count
Company1 Internal 2
Company2 Internal 3
Company3 Internal 5
Company2 External 10
Company1 External 7
Company3 External 3
etc...
I want to show this in a report as follows:
Internal External
Company1 2 7
Company2 3 10
Company3 5 3
I can't figure out how to select a specific field from the dataset (e.g. Company = Company1 and Lead_Type = Internal). This sort of thing must be done all the time, I'm sure I'm missing something fairly obvious. Any posts back gratefully received.
Thanks
Guy.
I'm pararmeterizing a SQLDataSource, but I've encountered a problem. The users want all records returned if no ID is provided. So when they first hit the page, they will see all records, then they can filter down to one ID if needed. However, if I add a selectparameter of ID, I have to default it to a value, which won't give the users all records. Suggestions?
View 1 Replies View Related
Hallo
Is there a way to conditionally execute a task?
I got a task €œMail Send€œ and I would like to execute it, just if the variable X (my message source) has a value.
I try in expressions €œDisable€? = len(@[Benutzer::Msg] ) > 5 ? false : true, but it does not work.
I'm inside a "dataflow" and
i have a conditional spliter
one of the condition say "ok"
and the the other says "not ok"
when my flow goes to the "not ok" condition
I want to Abort the entire package execution
I want to make it sure that the package is terminated
and could not triggers the next control in the control flow.
i want to kill/ abort the execution of all my SSIS processes
for the entire package within the current dataflow
Is it possible with SSRS to conditionally display parameters.
Example, we have dimension concepts that we would like to use in reporting on an Either/Or basis
1. Choose Country
then choose either
2. Geography - Country>Region>Market>Submarket
3. Division - Country>Division>Submarket
The users would like a choice of reporting by Geography or Division
So, choosing Geography will then lead to cascading parameters of Region>Market
Choosing Division would lead to a Division paramter only
Is it possible to do this with SSRS?
Hi,
I have conditionially visible groups that are show/hide based on a report parameter. The problem is that I also want to have a document label on this group. When the group is hidden a blank entry appears in the doument map rather that no entry at all. Is this a bug or is there some work around. Thanks.
I have a sql server table column that can contain the following possible values. 1. 766/IT 2. 777/HR3. 890/EG4. 012/AS5. Trainee6. Contractor 7. Others I want to write an SQL query grouped by this column, Trainee should be one group, Contractor should be another different group, Others should be another different group and then every thing else ( 766/IT ,777/HR ,890/EG, 012/AS) should be grouped together as one group. Think of it in terms of a pie chart with those groups.
View 4 Replies View RelatedIm having a play using @@identity
I want to insert some data into a table
Get the AutoID value on the inserted data
then insert some other data into another table
and set its id value to the captured @@identity
My question
I only want to do the second insert only if
@FieldValue2 contains a value ie not empty
below is a basic procedure without conditonal part
Code:
CREATE PROCEDURE conditional_Insert
@FieldID As int,
@FieldValue As Nvarchar(50),
@FieldValue2 As Nvarchar(50)
AS
declare @id int
set nocount on
INSERT INTO Table1(fieldID,fieldvalue)
VALUES( @FieldID, @FieldValue)
set @id = @@identity
INSERT INTO Table2(fieldID2, FieldValue2)
VALUES(@id, @FieldValue2)
select @id
GO
I have a am doing some date calcs () . The situation is that I have a Move date (date a customer moved to a new home). I want to calculate their sales for the following 0-3 months after the move (month 0 being the move month). I have the month and year of the move (MthStart, YrStart), and I am adding 3 to MthStart to get the MthEnd of that 0-3 month period. I will then find sales BETWEEN YrStart&MthStart AND YrEnd&MthEnd (there is a YrMth field in the sales table)
Of course, for MthStarts 10, 11, and 12, the ends are 13, 14, and 15. So for these, I need to subtract 12, and increment the YrEnd by 1.
I am wondering if there is a way to update both the MthEnd and YrEnd fields at one time instead of separate SETs (or maybe I am just thinking about this the hard way to begin with). Is there a way to update both in a single CASE statement like WHEN MthEnd> 12 THEN MthEnd-12 AND YrEnd+1?
Code:
CREATE TABLE #myTable (
YrStart INT,
MthStart INT,
YrEnd INT,
MthEnd INT);
[code]....
Is there a way to make a sql table trigger fire off conditionally on calling app?We have this vendor app database which also have in-house custom built app operates on them. Some one are thinking using triggers to audit second part of the app activities, but want to skip the vendor app part of operation for at least performance reason.To my knowledge, the answer is no. An insert trigger will fire off whenever there is an insert. It doesn't provide a mechanism to check which app/process first, then conditionally fire or not fire.
View 6 Replies View RelatedHi all,
I am really new to SSIS, so may be this is a really simple question, but I couldnt find an answer yet.
I need to build a package that
1) counts the rows from a view
2) if rowcount >0 extracts the data into a file
I tryed to do this using a Row Count Transformation in the data flow, but after putting the count in a variable I am not able to perform the "conditional" phase two.
I mean that I want to check the value of the variable, but cannot figure out how to conditionally execute the flat file extraction.
Using Row Count, I have to build 2 data flow tasks.
Is there a way to do this in a single data flow?
May be using an Execute SQL Task instead of row count?
Any suggestions will ge greately appreciated
IgorB
Here is my dataset used by my report definition. The combo of barcode and order id is unique. The 'isDiscountedItem' field indicates if the customer used a coupon to purchased an item at a lower price.
departmentId classId barcode orderId isDiscountedItem
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1 123 1 True
2 7 456 1 False
1 1 123 2 False
1 1 123 3 True
1 1 789 3 True
2 7 456 3 False
... ... ... ... ...
I want to group my report by department id, class id and barcode. Then, I want to count all distinct order ids for which there was at leat one discounted item.
My report would produce the following output considering the above dataset:
Merchandise Number of customers who used a coupon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department 1 2
Class 1 2
Barcode 123 2
Barcode 789 1
Department 2 0
Class 7 0
Barcode 456 0
I've been looking at a possible solution using hash tables defined in the report code but I would like to find a 'cleaner' solution. Any help would be appreciated.
I just spent about 30mins searching through the forums for this and saw several posts, but I didn't find a straight answer that seems like it would work for my report. How can I add only 2 data rows to a group (to hide them via the group's visible properties) and keep the rest of the rows outside of the group, but still in the same column (vertical area), as shown:
This is the view of all rows:
Cat1
Cat2
Product A
Data 1
#
#
Data 2
#
#
Data 3
#
#
Data 4
#
#
Data 5
#
#
Data 6
#
#
Product B
Data 1
#
#
Data 2
#
#
Data 3
#
#
Data 4
#
#
Data 5
#
#
Data 6
#
#
And this is the view I'm seeking in some cases:
Cat1
Cat2
Product A
Data 1
#
#
Data 4
#
#
Data 5
#
#
Data 6
#
#
Product B
Data 1
#
#
Data 4
#
#
Data 5
#
#
Data 6
#
#
I created a subtotal for my column group by right-clicking on the group and selecting subtotal. I would like to add the condition to the subtotal, that if the value is less than 0 to print zero and not the negative subtotal amount. Is there a way to do this? I haven't been able to find a way to add an expression to the greyed out subtotal field. Thanks.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI apologize if I'm posting this question in the wrong forum.
I have a query that exports data from an Oracle database to an Excel spreadsheet. The application that executes the query is Computer Associates Eureka Report writer. I do not have direct access to the database or any of its objects. With the data in Excel, I run a VBA macro-driven inventory report. The Excel spreadsheet row limitation is not a problem presently, however, the query exports a lot of extraneous data that I don't need. I actually export about a dozen columns of data however I'm only listing 4 in the example below.
Example:
CaseNum ActionDate ActionType ComplCd
1029901 09/08/2006 F 0
1029901 09/11/2006 C 0
1029901 08/18/2006 C 1
1029901 08/17/2006 F 1
1029901 08/01/2006 F 1
When the ComplCd = 1 I only want the query to export one row of data for each CaseNum. Is
there a way to code my query to accomplish this?
ugabulldog
Howdy folks, first time poster.
In a UDF, how is the best way to extend a query with additional clauses based on expressions? The user input here is used to refine the basic query by introducing additional clauses. Is there something like the following?
-- The basic query
SELECT column
FROM table
WHERE clause
-- Additional clause, only appended to query
-- if expression evaluates to true
IF @parameter <> default_value
BEGIN
AND additional_clause
END
Right now I'm using CASE like the following, but it necessarily makes the query longer. Is there a more efficient way?
-- The basic query
SELECT column
FROM table
WHERE clause
-- Additional clause, should only effect result
-- set when the parameter is not default_value
AND table.column =
CASE @parameter
WHEN default_value THEN
-- identity, table.column=table.column,
-- should have no effect other than just a long query
table.column
ELSE
@parameter
END
I am building a Table Report where I need to "count" the number of cells in a column conditionally.
I have a column of data where the values will be "Orange", "Apple", "Banana", NULL
The pseudocode would be something like this:
iCountOfOranges as Integer
iCountOfApples as Integer
iCountOfBananas as Integer
IF Cell.Value = "Orange" THEN
iCountOfOranges = iCountOfOranges + 1
ELSE IF Cell.Value = "Apple" THEN
iCountOfApples = iCountOfApples + 1
ELSE IF Cell.Value = "Banana" THEN
iCountOfBananas = iCountOfBananas + 1
The 3 count values would then be displayed in 3 footer rows at the bottom of the table.
Thanks
Having one invoice table (ord) and one 'person' table (actor) I would like to include the name of the person who is responsible for an invoice: SELECT Ord.OrdNo, Ord.Selbuy, AC.Nm AS 'Responsible', AC.EmpNoFROM OrdLEFT OUTER JOIN Actor AS AC ON Ord.Selbuy = AC.EmpNoWHERE ord.ordno = 23505 This works perfectly fine if Ord.Selbuy has a corresponding value in Actor:|26914 |21|Yvonne| 21| or if there is no corresponding value in Actor:|26914 |21|NULL| NULL| But what if Ord.Selbuy=0? Then I end up with 3285 rows from Actor! This happens because Actor.EmpNo=0 is allowed. Persons which have never been employed or used to be employed gets Actor.EmpNo=0.Can I create a SELECT statement which only returns data from the INVOICE row if Ord.Selbuy=0?|26914 |21|NULL| NULL| p.s. I'm not able to change table structure/behavior of update procedures, because the tables/code belong to a "bought from the shelf"-business system.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThis should be a simple solution, but it has been a long time since I've done any query writing (mostly in Oracle) and I am stumped, so here goes:
We are in the process of converting Access database to MSSQL with web form front ends.
I have a table, all columns are nullable, and want users to be able to query from a form, which has a field for each column and defaults to a % wild card for the entered value.
I want the users to be able to put any string in any field, and have it return each row that matches that, including rows with null values in the other columns, but not the column with the entered criteria.
Here is a sample of the data:
Code:
SQL> select * from test;
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
----- ----- ----- -----
this is a test
this is not test
this is not
this is test too
is test too
is too
is too
7 rows selected.
Now, if I have this SQL run, it will return only rows that have no nulls in any columns:
Code:
select
col1,
col2,
col3,
col4from test
where
col1 like'th%'
and col2 like '%'
and col3 like '%'
and col4 like '%';
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
----- ----- ----- -----
this is a test
this is not test
this is test too
Now, if I use an OR clause for each column, this mostly works, but the trouble is it will also return rows with null values for the field that has criteria entered in it:
Code:
select
col1,
col2,
col3,
col4from test
where
(col1 like'th%' OR col1 is null)
and (col2 like '%' OR col2 is null)
and (col3 like '%' OR col3 is null)
and (col4 like '%' OR col4 is null);
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
----- ----- ----- -----
this is a test
this is not test
this is not
this is test too
is test too
is too
is too
The idea is to only select the first 4 rows in the above example.
I was playing with ISNULL in the select clause, but all it does is substitute a string for a null, and I think CASE will do the same thing.
Is there a way I can write this query so it will return rows with NULL values in any column, except the one(column) that has user entered criteria in it?
I have a table sorted by vendor, then item, then Status date with a QC Pass date and Fail date.
I need a SQL 2008 view that counts how many consecutive times a Vendor/Item has passed QC.
When it fails, the count resets to zero, then begins incrementing again.
I need to know how to generate the last column (Count).
I have tried using a ROW_Number() OVER(Partition BY, Order By...) command in the view, but I cannot seem to make it work right.
VendorItemStatusDatePassDate Faildate Count
10056322010-05-092010-05-091
10056322012-12-152012-12-152
10056322013-05-252013-05-253
10056322014-11-172014-11-174
[Code] ....
Does anyone know how to do the following. I'm trying to mimicreplication with triggers.I have 2 databases, each have these 2 tables.1.USERSID intNAME varchar(20)2.CHANGESTABLE varchar(20)TYPE varchar(10)col1 varchar(20)col2 varchar(20)On the USERS table I have a for insert trigger. Whenever a new user isadded the trigger puts an entry into the CHANGES table such as("USERS", "INSERT", "1", "Fred")I now have an application (vb.net) that monitors the CHANGES table onserver1. If it finds an entry it determines the table using the TABLEcolumn and performs the necessary insert and deletes the entry fromCHANGES. Now the problem is server2 also has an for insert trigger onthe USERS table so it puts an entry into CHANGES on server2. As youcan imagine this goes around in a loop.What I was hoping for was someway of saying, "I'm inserting from myapplication so don't do the trigger".Any ideas gratefully appreciated.Steve.
View 9 Replies View Related