Hi All;
I am getting ;
INSERT statement conflicted with TABLE FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_ChecklistCases_ChecklistFGroups'. The conflict occurred in database 'Test', table 'ChecklistFGroups'. The statement has been terminated.
but it seems to be no error can you help me please I can send you the related part of database
thank you
Hi, I have developed a website in asp.net 2. I have tester it and it is working fine on my computer but when I have uploaded it to my server I'm getting an error message when the user signup. The error occurs when I'm setting the user role to 'members'.
Error line > Roles.AddUserToRole(user.UserName, "members")
The strage thig is that it is working on my computer but not on the server. My home computer and the server are running the same software versions and the website database is the same as well.
To double check that my code is not generating the error I have lonched 'SQL Query Analizer' and executed the folowing code on my database:
NOTE: In my database I have create the user “teeluk12� and a role “members�
aspnet_UsersInRoles_AddUsersToRoles "/", "teeluk12", "members", "5/02/2006 4:44:33 pm"
Once again the code is working on my home computer but not on the server. On the server I'm getting the following error:
Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_AddUsersToRoles, Line 76
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.
Does anybody know what could cause the error?
Could it be some permissions that I didn't set on my server?
Thanks for my help and suggestions...
Regards,
Gonzal
Hi;
I am getting this error while I am trying to delete a record from "MediaTypes" table
Media Types table and DVBTestCOutputs table have related through MediaID (cascade on update only not delete)
MediaTypes DVBTestCOutputs
------------- ---------------------
MediaID int ..........................
MType char(10) ..........................
MediaType int
DELETE statement conflicted with COLUMN REFERENCE constraint 'FK_DVBTestCOutputs_MediaTypes1'. The conflict occurred in database 'Test', table 'DVBTestCOutputs', column 'MediaType'.
can you help me please I do not want the related record deleted also from DVBTestCOutputs table so I didn't choose the cascade on delete checkbox is this the problem??
UPDATE #TMPC
SET EsaItem = ItemClass
FROM #TMPC A,
dbo.EisAdj_ItemClass_V B
WHERE A.EsaItem = B.ItemClassCODE
This code is part of my procedure. I always get error--Server: Msg 446, Level 16, State 9, Procedure GetAdjDataFromShipment, Line 282
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.
when program execute at this section.
I try to add this statement "COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS", but it seems not working. I do not know why!
Hi,
I am getting the following error message when trying to run a script:
"Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation."
Any help on resolving this would be most appreciated, thanks!
my SQL code is as follows:
CREATEVIEW IP_SLAM_EXTRACT_1
AS
SELECT LEFT(a.provider,3) AS [Trust Code],
CASEWHEN a.practice_code='F86687'THEN 'F86723'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86733'THEN 'F86068'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86677' OR
a.practice_code='F86693'THEN 'F86675'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86714' OR
a.practice_code='F86129'THEN 'F86634'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86050'THEN 'Y00090'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86669' OR
a.practice_code='F86662'THEN 'F86702'
WHEN a.practice_code='F886051' THEN 'F86634'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86059' OR
a.practice_code='F86055'THEN 'F86060'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86690'THEN 'F86637'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86089'THEN 'F86060'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86717' OR
a.practice_code='F86728'THEN 'F86716'
WHEN a.practice_code='F86727' OR
a.practice_code='F86728'THEN 'F86721'
WHEN a.practice_code IS NULL AND
a.postcode NOT IN
(SELECT DISTINCT p.POSTCODE
FROM REPOSITORY..[Exeter PostCode]p)THEN 'Null_not_5NA'
WHEN a.practice_code IS NULL AND
a.postcode IN
(SELECT DISTINCT p.POSTCODE
FROM REPOSITORY..[Exeter PostCode]p)THEN 'Null_5NA'
ELSE a.practice_code END AS [GP Practice],
LEFT(
CASE WHEN a.treatment_function_code LIKE 'mis%' OR
a.treatment_function_code LIKE '?%' OR
a.treatment_function_code LIKE '#%' THEN
a.main_specialty_code
WHEN a.treatment_function_code ='' OR
a.treatment_function_code IS NULL AND
a.main_specialty_code IS NOT NULL THEN
a.main_specialty_code
WHEN a.treatment_function_code ='' OR
a.treatment_function_code IS NULL AND
a.main_specialty_code IS NULL THEN '999'
WHEN a.treatment_function_code LIKE '0%'THEN '999'
ELSE a.treatment_function_code END,3) AS [Specialty Code],
a.hrg_code_calculated AS [HRG Code],
a.local_patient_identifier as [Patient id Code],
a.patient_classificationAS [Pat Class],
a.admission_method AS [Adm Method],
a.spell_discharge_date,
a.consultant_code,
a.diagnosis_primary_icd,
a.gp AS [GP Code],
a.length_of_stay AS [Spell LOS],
--pat_type,
--prv_typ,
a.spell_special_service AS Spell_Service_ID,
a.date_of_birth,
a.administrative_category,
a.cds_type
--FROMSUS_5NA_NEW_0607 a--
FROM SUS_apc_5NA_view a
WHEREa.fin_month < 4
AND a.fin_year = 2008
ANDa.main_episode='M'
ANDa.pbr_exclusion IS NULL
ANDa.pct_calculated = '5NA'
ANDa.commissioner LIKE '5NA%'
ANDa.Spell_Discharge_Date<'30/06/2007'
I'm getting the following errors when trying to execute the following script on the server, its part of the standard asp.net membership and roles, anybody have any ideas how I get get round this?
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 50
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 58
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 84
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 92
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles] Script Date: 05/20/2007 11:23:33 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]') AND type in (N'P', N'PC'))
BEGIN
EXEC dbo.sp_executesql @statement = N'
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]
@ApplicationName nvarchar(256),
@UserNames nvarchar(4000),
@RoleNames nvarchar(4000)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @AppId uniqueidentifier
SELECT @AppId = NULL
SELECT @AppId = ApplicationId FROM aspnet_Applications WHERE LOWER(@ApplicationName) = LoweredApplicationName
IF (@AppId IS NULL)
RETURN(2)
DECLARE @TranStarted bit
SET @TranStarted = 0
IF( @@TRANCOUNT = 0 )
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
SET @TranStarted = 1
END
DECLARE @tbNames table(Name nvarchar(256) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbRoles table(RoleId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbUsers table(UserId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @Num int
DECLARE @Pos int
DECLARE @NextPos int
DECLARE @Name nvarchar(256)
DECLARE @CountAll int
DECLARE @CountU int
DECLARE @CountR int
SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1
WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@RoleNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @RoleNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@RoleNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@RoleNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1
INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END
INSERT INTO @tbRoles
SELECT RoleId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredRoleName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId
SELECT @CountR = @@ROWCOUNT
IF (@CountR <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 N'''', Name
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT ar.LoweredRoleName FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbRoles r WHERE r.RoleId = ar.RoleId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(2)
END
DELETE FROM @tbNames WHERE 1=1
SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1
WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@UserNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @UserNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@UserNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@UserNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1
INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END
INSERT INTO @tbUsers
SELECT UserId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Users ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredUserName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId
SELECT @CountU = @@ROWCOUNT
IF (@CountU <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 Name, N''''
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT au.LoweredUserName FROM dbo.aspnet_Users au, @tbUsers u WHERE u.UserId = au.UserId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(1)
END
SELECT @CountAll = COUNT(*)
FROMdbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur, @tbUsers u, @tbRoles r
WHERE ur.UserId = u.UserId AND ur.RoleId = r.RoleId
IF (@CountAll <> @CountU * @CountR)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 UserName, RoleName
FROM @tbUsers tu, @tbRoles tr, dbo.aspnet_Users u, dbo.aspnet_Roles r
WHERE u.UserId = tu.UserId AND r.RoleId = tr.RoleId AND
tu.UserId NOT IN (SELECT ur.UserId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.RoleId = tr.RoleId) AND
tr.RoleId NOT IN (SELECT ur.RoleId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.UserId = tu.UserId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(3)
END
DELETE FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles
WHERE UserId IN (SELECT UserId FROM @tbUsers)
AND RoleId IN (SELECT RoleId FROM @tbRoles)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN(0)
END
'
END
GO
Thanks
I am facing the Follwing error:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_BIN" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Follwing is my Code:
code]select * from #temp_Table a
where ltrim(rtrim(Model_ID))+''+ltrim(rtrim(Set_Serial_Number)) in
(select ltrim(rtrim(b.Model_SerialNo)) from #temp_Table2 b where b.Auto_Id=1)[[/code]
So Please help me to proper solutions
Thank's
while using store procedure in report getting error as mentioned below.
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Hello,
I have a distributed query that uses tables located on in SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2000? Does anyone know how I can fix the error below?
Thanks a lot for help!
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Hi..
I have configured publisher, distributer,subscriber... and tried to replicate it... it has done successfully...
When i try to add datas to the publisher ... it says
"conflict error"
can you please tell me how to check the replication is successfull or not.
and i want to add datas to publisher so that it should frequently updated in subscriber...
I'm getting the following errors when trying to execute the following script on the server, its part of the standard asp.net membership and roles, anybody have any ideas how I get get round this? Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 50
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 58
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 84
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Procedure aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles, Line 92
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles] Script Date: 05/20/2007 11:23:33 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF
GO
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]') AND type in (N'P', N'PC'))
BEGIN
EXEC dbo.sp_executesql @statement = N'
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[aspnet_UsersInRoles_RemoveUsersFromRoles]
@ApplicationName nvarchar(256),
@UserNames nvarchar(4000),
@RoleNames nvarchar(4000)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @AppId uniqueidentifier
SELECT @AppId = NULL
SELECT @AppId = ApplicationId FROM aspnet_Applications WHERE LOWER(@ApplicationName) = LoweredApplicationName
IF (@AppId IS NULL)
RETURN(2)
DECLARE @TranStarted bit
SET @TranStarted = 0
IF( @@TRANCOUNT = 0 )
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
SET @TranStarted = 1
END
DECLARE @tbNames table(Name nvarchar(256) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbRoles table(RoleId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @tbUsers table(UserId uniqueidentifier NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
DECLARE @Num int
DECLARE @Pos int
DECLARE @NextPos int
DECLARE @Name nvarchar(256)
DECLARE @CountAll int
DECLARE @CountU int
DECLARE @CountR int
SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1
WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@RoleNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @RoleNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@RoleNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@RoleNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1
INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END
INSERT INTO @tbRoles
SELECT RoleId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredRoleName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId
SELECT @CountR = @@ROWCOUNT
IF (@CountR <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 N'''', Name
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT ar.LoweredRoleName FROM dbo.aspnet_Roles ar, @tbRoles r WHERE r.RoleId = ar.RoleId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(2)
END
DELETE FROM @tbNames WHERE 1=1
SET @Num = 0
SET @Pos = 1
WHILE(@Pos <= LEN(@UserNames))
BEGIN
SELECT @NextPos = CHARINDEX(N'','', @UserNames, @Pos)
IF (@NextPos = 0 OR @NextPos IS NULL)
SELECT @NextPos = LEN(@UserNames) + 1
SELECT @Name = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@UserNames, @Pos, @NextPos - @Pos)))
SELECT @Pos = @NextPos+1
INSERT INTO @tbNames VALUES (@Name)
SET @Num = @Num + 1
END
INSERT INTO @tbUsers
SELECT UserId
FROM dbo.aspnet_Users ar, @tbNames t
WHERE LOWER(t.Name) = ar.LoweredUserName AND ar.ApplicationId = @AppId
SELECT @CountU = @@ROWCOUNT
IF (@CountU <> @Num)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 Name, N''''
FROM @tbNames
WHERE LOWER(Name) NOT IN (SELECT au.LoweredUserName FROM dbo.aspnet_Users au, @tbUsers u WHERE u.UserId = au.UserId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(1)
END
SELECT @CountAll = COUNT(*)
FROMdbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur, @tbUsers u, @tbRoles r
WHERE ur.UserId = u.UserId AND ur.RoleId = r.RoleId
IF (@CountAll <> @CountU * @CountR)
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 UserName, RoleName
FROM @tbUsers tu, @tbRoles tr, dbo.aspnet_Users u, dbo.aspnet_Roles r
WHERE u.UserId = tu.UserId AND r.RoleId = tr.RoleId AND
tu.UserId NOT IN (SELECT ur.UserId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.RoleId = tr.RoleId) AND
tr.RoleId NOT IN (SELECT ur.RoleId FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles ur WHERE ur.UserId = tu.UserId)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RETURN(3)
END
DELETE FROM dbo.aspnet_UsersInRoles
WHERE UserId IN (SELECT UserId FROM @tbUsers)
AND RoleId IN (SELECT RoleId FROM @tbRoles)
IF( @TranStarted = 1 )
COMMIT TRANSACTION
RETURN(0)
END
'
END
GOAny help appreciated thanks,
Exception information:System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation.
Who can tell me how to resolve this problem?
Thx
Hi all,
I have a query that I need to run where I join two tables that both
reside on different servers. I use an INNER JOIN statement to attempt
to join these tables, but for some reason I am getting the following
error message...
"
Cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation."
The query is as follows...
SELECT TABLE_NAME, LEFT(TABLE_NAME, CHARINDEX('_', TABLE_NAME + '_') - 1) AS Abbreviation
FROM mrcsmis.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
INNER JOIN DEVELCAD1.Portal.dbo.dnl_db_names_log AS imp ON (imp.dnl_table_name = TABLE_NAME)
WHERE (TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE')
Thanks
Tryst
I am practicing on vmware 2 node failover cluster for doing Sql failover clustering understanding.I did proper Ad Dc setup and configured san storage through iscsi software that I downloaded from net.I did target and initiator configuration for san storage on same Domain controller vm.Name of target is Target1 and has two initialtor for node1 and node2.It has two virtual disk assigned Quorumdisk.vhd and sqldisk.vhd.ON vmnode1 I have initialzed and formatted my both disk with proper volume and label.
Node which are participating in cluster are node1 and node2.while my windows clustering went fine,while Sql server installation on node 1,i got error IP Address conflict occured.
my DC has IP address:192.168.1.10
my Node1 is 192.168.1.20
node2:192.168.1.30
Cluster IP address is 192.168.1.35
What has cause this situation.What configuration is needed.How do I troubleshoot this problem as now I can not install my sql for clustering as also gave me Invalid network name error.Is my storage configuration not proper or IP address is in correct?Do I need to put my virtual disk in Clustered shared volume?
While using store procedure in report getting error as mentioned below !
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
I have just upgraded to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000.In Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio, when I click on databaseproperties, I receive the following error:-Cannot resolve the collation conflict between"Latin1_General_CI_AS"and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 468)Some reference suggest that I can change the database collation byclicking database properties!What can I do?
View 21 Replies View RelatedHi!
Does anybody know if there are any conflicts using an XP computer as server and running SQL 7.0 on it?
I have a laptop using Windows XP, that I also have installed SQL 7.0 on (desktop version). I use it both as a client and as a server. As a client I am connecting to the NT server and it is working perfectly. When I try to run my SQL developed software against the local server though, I get a message saying
"-2147217900 - Duplicate record or Record is in use.
The request for procedure "TABLE NAME" failed because "TABLE NAME" is a table object"
Any suggestions how to solve this?
thanx in advance
/Corinne
why do i get collation conflict when i used temp table ??Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "Latin1_General_CI_AI" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.i solved it by using COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS (the column name)will i have collation conflicts again when i put my web app on a web hosting company??
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi;
I have 2 tables Users and DVDTestResults these tables have a relation over UserID
Users.UserID
DVDTestResults.UserName
both char
But when I try to insert in DVDTestResults I am having an error:
INSERT statement conflicted with COLUMN FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_DVDTestResults_Users'. The conflict occurred in database 'Test', table 'Users', column 'UserID'. The statement has been terminated.
can you help me why?
thank you....
I am doing this in SQL Query analyzer:select dbo.GetTimedifference(CAST('5:30 PM' AS DATETIME),CAST('12:00 PM' AS DATETIME))it will give me (- 05:30) which is correct if i am talking about 12:00 PM midnight, what if I ment 12:00 PM in the noon, I mean, 11:00 AM, then 12:00 PM, it should give me, (5:30)since 5:30 Pm is 5:30 hours pass 12:00 PM noon, how can I solve that ?thanks a lot.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi
I'm using merge replication between 10 SQL server 7.0 SP2 machines. One central server is the publisher and 9 subscribers. I’ve setup an alert to get a message in case of conflicts. I defined it to trigger everytime the performance counter conflicts/sec rises above 0.
After some experimenting this seems now to work reliable, but there is still one point which bothers me. All conflicts are kept in the conflict history and everytime I get a message through the alert the number of copnflicts stated in the message increases by one.
Also if I open view replication conflicts in EM all conflicts can still be viewed even those I manually resolved. I can't even find a way to seen which conflicts are new ones and which have been resolved already. Does anybody know a way how to reset this numbers without going through all the conflict tables.
Markus
I have a database thats got sql as the engine and access 2000 for the client side. and every time I edit a record this "Write Conflict" comes up. I dont know why its doing that but Idont want that happening whent the database goes live and my users start editing records. what do I, apparently its a Replication Conflict
View 14 Replies View Relatedhas anyone had sucess in troubleshooting conflicts between these two?
I need to shut down the sybase client on a machine that is running MS SQL if thats possible.
Hi all,
I have a db server which was installed with Collation 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS' and now I have to replace this server with a new server and I want to install this server with Collation 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CI_AS'.
I am using Linked Servers to collect some data from my Sybase database which has "Code Page 850 (Multilingual) character set,us_english,Binary ordering, for use with Code Page 850 (cp850)."
But with new SQL server(case-insensitive settings), I am unable to run a select query (joining a local server and sybase server) and I get an error message "cannot resolve collation conflict for equal to operation"
I have tried changing property of linked server by specifying Remote server collation to true and Collation Name as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS' as well as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP850_Bin' but I do get the same error message.
Could any of you please help me in this regard ?
Thanks in advance.
Wilson
Edit: Sorted out. Somehow it is working now after specifying Remote server collation to true and Collation Name as 'SQL_Latin_General_CP1_CS_AS'
Moving code from Sybase to SQL Server 2005. I have two tables. One table (vINID) is reset and populated right before this code runs. The other table (vINPA) is a table in the database used by the Front End App. This is the error I get when I try and run on our SQL Server 2005.
Msg 468, Level 16, State 9, Line 1
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Latin1_General_BIN" in the equal to operation.
Here is the SQL code:
SELECT DISTINCT
vINID.BLEI_CK,
vINID.BLIV_ID,
ISNULL(vINPA.RCPT_AMT,0) AS RCPT_AMT
FROM Reporting_DEV.dbo.RPT_04597_INID AS vINID -- table re-populated
LEFT JOIN fauafpr0_pids.dbo.CDS_INPA_PMT_ACT AS vINPA
ON vINPA.BLIV_ID = vINID.BLIV_ID
WHERE vINID.BLIV_ID = '071600007594'
Thank you for your help.
David
i have converted an access database to SQL
and now when i add a record and then later go back to change the new data it says that their is a write conflict
ne ideas????
thanks
Kris
All,
How do I solve a primary key conflict for a mutiple select statement.
When SQL finds a duplicate entry I doesn't ignore it like access but it doesn't insert anything.
It should be something like where not in.....
Thanks in advance
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[z_qry_history_1_is]
AS
INSERT INTO r_tbl_history_is_rg ( ean_code, contractnr, switch_id, bakje, week, jaar )
SELECT distinct r_tbl_is_open.ean_code,
r_tbl_is_open.transaction_id,
r_tbl_is_open.switch_id,
r_tbl_is_open.bakje, datepart(ww,getdate()) AS Expr1, datepart(yyyy,getdate()) AS Expr2
FROM r_tbl_is_open;
GO
Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'aaaaar_tbl_history_is_rg_PK'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'r_tbl_history_is_rg'.
The statement has been terminated.
While I execute one query its showing this error:
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.
Can help me please!
Shaji
I have merge replication set with with one publisher and three subscribers (push subscription). From time to time I get the following in the conflict table:
"The same row was updated at both 'Publisher.database' and 'Subscriber.database'. The resolver chose the update from 'Publisher.database' as the winner"
This is weird because the UPDATE only happend at the given subscriber. I checked the publisher and all other subscribers and there was never an UPDATE on this table. Also, the update at the publisher was actually the record that was already present.
I'm kinda stuck here. Any help or comments are greatly appreciated.
i have a dts package that is going to run at night and pull data from2 tables in an Oracle db and load it to 2 staging tables that mypackage creates in sql server 2000. i then execute a few sprocs toand columns, indexes, etc. after that all happens successfully i wantto delete the two production tables and rename the staging tables totake their place.the problem is that when i run the sproc to add the indexes,constraints, etc i get an error because objects with the same nameexist on the 2 production tables. i can't delete the productiontables until the very last step. i thought about generating a randomnumber in my sproc and using it as the name of the index but thatseems crude and messy. any ideas?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am running merge replication on SQL Server 2005. Included in replication are 6 Subscribers and one Publisher/Distributor. Replication compatibility level is SQL 2005 and I am using row-level tracking. Servers are synchronized in 5 minutes each (so gap between two consecutive syncs of one server is 30 minutes)
Earlier all of this was on compatibility level SQL 2000, since all servers were upgraded from 2000 to 2005. But 10 days ago I upgraded and replication compatibility to 2005. I did not initialize subscription, since I had data in place and db's ready for merge replication.
Since that 10 days ago I have column update conflict on each row change. Not just if it is changed at same time at different subscribers. For example, if I change one row today, and somebody else changes it three days later on other subscriber it counts as a conflict. He always chooses good (updated) version of data as winner, but it is quite annoying having 15000 conflicts in one table daily. And it makes harder to track other conflicts.
Does it have anything to do with row level column tracking, or it is some known bug? Or, even better, if anyone knows how to avoid it. I was thinking about changing it to column level, but then I need to reinitialize subscriptions which means sending of 9 GB data through some pretty slow lines (256 kbp/s), or few hours work to drop existing subscriptions and create new one's. Maybe I would to this if I knew that column level will help.
Hi,
l've a raw data which contains list of device name and # of wires used, i.e.
DEVICE NAME # of Wires
--------------------- -------------
A 10
B 11
C 17
D 5
A 0
E 0
So l would like to import these data into my table (with device name as primary key) which each device only appear once. If the device name appear twices, then l should ignore device with # of wires = 0. If device name appear twice and # of wires <> 0, then l should log it.
How should l do that in SSIS ?
Hi,
I developed an ppc application, where i am using web service for synchronisation, but here i am getting lot of problem while handling conflict management.
Please suggest me how to manage conflicts, using web service.
Thank you,
Prashant