Connection For Clustered Server

Sep 7, 2004

We have having a problem connecting to our 4 node cluster using an ado.net connection.


Here is what we have:





Connection String:





<appSettings>


<add key="ConnectionString" value="workstation id=AH501780;packet size=4096;integrated security=SSPI;data source=XXXXXXXXXXXX;persist security info=False;initial catalog=xxxx" />


</appSettings>








We added in the Web.config file:





<identity impersonate="true"/>


<authentication mode="Windows" />








In IIS 6 we have windows authentication checked.





We get the following error when we try to run the program:





SQL Server does not exist or access denied.


Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.





Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: SQL Server does not exist or access denied.











We have the SQL Profiler running and we don't see any connection being made. Any help would be appreciated!





Thanks,


Trey

View 7 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Restore A Database On Clustered Server From A Non-clustered Backup File.

Aug 24, 2006

Hello,

How do I restore a sql database that is on a clustered server from a sql database backup file that is on a non_clustered server?

Thanks,



Serey

View 3 Replies View Related

Create Clustered Or Non-clustered Index On Large Table ( SQL Server 7 )

Jan 4, 2008

I have large table with 10million records. I would like to create clustered or non-clustered index.

What is the quick way to create? I have tried once and it took more than 10 min.

please help.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Change Primary Key Non-clustered To Primary Key Clustered

Feb 4, 2015

We have a table, which has one clustered index and one non clustered index(primary key). I want to drop the existing clustered index and make the primary key as clustered. Is there any easy way to do that. Will Drop_Existing support on this matter?

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Logic To Rebuild Only Clustered Indexes / Skipping To Rebuild Non Clustered Indexes In Same Table

Jun 25, 2015

I have a requirement to only rebuild the Clustered Indexes in the table ignoring the non clustered indexes as those are taken care of by the Clustered indexes.

In order to do that, I have taken the records based on the fragmentation %.

But unable to come up with a logic to only consider rebuilding the clustered indexes in the table.

create table #fragmentation
(
FragIndexId BigInt Identity(1,1),
--IDENTITY(int, 1, 1) AS FragIndexId,
DBNAME nvarchar(4000),
TableName nvarchar(4000),

[Code] ....

View 5 Replies View Related

DB Engine :: How To Convert Unique Clustered Index Into Clustered Primary Key To Use With Change Tracking

Sep 4, 2015

We are going to use SQL Sever change tracking. The problem is that some of our tables, which are to be tracked, have no primary keys. There are only unique clustered indexes. The question is what is the best way to turn on change tracking for these tables in our circumstances.

View 4 Replies View Related

DB Design :: Script To Create Table With Primary Key Non-clustered And Clustered Index

Aug 28, 2015

I desire to have a clustered index on a column other than the Primary Key. I have a few junction tables that I may want to alter, create table, or ...

I have practiced with an example table that is not really a junction table. It is just a table I decided to use for practice. When I execute the script, it seems to do everything I expect. For instance, there are not any constraints but there are indexes. The PK is the correct column.

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblNotificationMgr](
[NotificationMgrKey] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[ContactKey] [int] NOT NULL,
[EventTypeEnum] [tinyint] NOT NULL,

[code]....

View 20 Replies View Related

Data Warehousing :: Difference Between Primary Key With Clustered And Non-clustered Index

Jul 19, 2013

I have created two tables. table one has the following fields,

                      Id -> unique clustered index.
         table two has the following fields,
                      Tid -> unique clustered index
                      Id -> foreign key of table one(id).

Now I have created primary key for the table one column 'id'. It's created as "nonclustered, unique, primary key located on PRIMARY". Primary key create clustered index default. since unique clustered index existed in table one, it has created "Nonclustered primary key".

My Question is, What is the difference between "clustered, unique, primary key" and "nonclustered, unique, primary key"? Is there any performance impact between these?

View 5 Replies View Related

Converting A Clustered Index On A PK Identity Field To Non-clustered

Sep 8, 2006

Hi there, I have a table that has an IDENTITY column and it is the PK of this table. By default SQL Server creates a unique clustered index on the PK, but this isn't what I wanted. I want to make a regular unique index on the column so I can make a clustered index on a different column.

If I try to uncheck the Clustered index option in EM I get a dialog that says "Cannot convert a clustered index to a nonclustered index using the DROP_EXISTING option.". If I simply try to delete the index I get the following "An explicit DROP INDEX is not allowed on index 'index name'. It is being used for PRIMARY KEY constraint enforcement.

So do I have to drop the PK constraint now? How does that affect all the tables that have FK relationships to this table?

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Remember Definitions Of Clustered And Non Clustered Indexes?

Nov 24, 2014

What is the easiest way to remember the definitions of clustered and non clustered indexes.

View 9 Replies View Related

Data Warehousing :: Primary Key Has Both A Clustered And Non-clustered Constraint

Sep 30, 2015

I have a really super slow stored proc that does something simple. it updates a table if certain values are received.

In looking at this the matching is done on the Primary Key, which is set as a Clustered index, looking further I have another constraint, that sets the same column to a Unique, Non-Clustered.

I am not sure why this was done, but it seems to be counter productive.  I have read only references to Which one is better on a primary key, but not can their be both and if it is "Smart".

View 4 Replies View Related

How To Alter A Non Clustered Primary Key Constraint To Clustered

Feb 26, 2008

Hello,


I've a table with primary key defined as non-clusterd, now without dropping it can I modify the existing index to clustered through tsql as I had to write some migration script and in that script I wanna do this.


Thanks in Advance,


Rohit

View 5 Replies View Related

Clustered/Non-clustered Indexes And B-Trees

Jan 31, 2005

I would like to find information on Clustered and Non-clustered indexes and how B-trees are used. I know a clustered index is placed into a b-tree which makes sense for fast ordered searching. What data structure does a non-clustered index use and how? I tried to find info. on the web but couldn't get much detail...

View 3 Replies View Related

Clustered And Non Clustered Index On Same Columns

Nov 1, 2007

I have a table<table1> with 804668 records primary on table1(col1,col2,col3,col4)

Have created non-clustered index on <table1>(col2,col3,col4),to solve a performance issue.(which is a join involving another table with 1.2 million records).Seems to be working great.

I want to know whether this will slow down,insert and update on the <table1>?

View 2 Replies View Related

Simple Query Chooses Clustered Index Scan Instead Of Clustered Index Seek

Nov 14, 2006

the query:

SELECT a.AssetGuid, a.Name, a.LocationGuid
FROM Asset a WHERE a.AssociationGuid IN (
SELECT ada.DataAssociationGuid FROM AssociationDataAssociation ada
WHERE ada.AssociationGuid = '568B40AD-5133-4237-9F3C-F8EA9D472662')

takes 30-60 seconds to run on my machine, due to a clustered index scan on our an index on asset [about half a million rows].  For this particular association less than 50 rows are returned. 

expanding the inner select into a list of guids the query runs instantly:

SELECT a.AssetGuid, a.Name, a.LocationGuid
FROM Asset a WHERE a.AssociationGuid IN (
'0F9C1654-9FAC-45FC-9997-5EBDAD21A4B4',
'52C616C0-C4C5-45F4-B691-7FA83462CA34',
'C95A6669-D6D1-460A-BC2F-C0F6756A234D')

It runs instantly because of doing a clustered index seek [on the same index as the previous query] instead of a scan.  The index in question IX_Asset_AssociationGuid is a nonclustered index on Asset.AssociationGuid.

The tables involved:

Asset, represents an asset.  Primary key is AssetGuid, there is an index/FK on Asset.AssociationGuid.  The asset table has 28 columns or so...
Association, kind of like a place, associations exist in a tree where one association can contain any number of child associations.  Each association has a ParentAssociationGuid pointing to its parent.  Only leaf associations contain assets. 
AssociationDataAssociation, a table consisting of two columns, AssociationGuid, DataAssociationGuid.  This is a table used to quickly find leaf associations [DataAssociationGuid] beneath a particular association [AssociationGuid].  In the above case the inner select () returns 3 rows. 

I'd include .sqlplan files or screenshots, but I don't see a way to attach them. 

I understand I can specify to use the index manually [and this also runs instantly], but for such a simple query it is peculiar it is necesscary.  This is the query with the index specified manually:

SELECT a.AssetGuid, a.Name, a.LocationGuid
FROM Asset a WITH (INDEX (IX_Asset_AssociationGuid)) WHERE
a.AssociationGuid IN (
SELECT ada.DataAssociationGuid FROM AssociationDataAssociation ada
WHERE ada.AssociationGuid = '568B40AD-5133-4237-9F3C-F8EA9D472662')

To repeat/clarify my question, why might this not be doing a clustered index seek with the first query?

View 15 Replies View Related

64-bit Server (clustered) 128 GB Ram - 155 GB Used

Jul 10, 2007

It seems the Server itself shows 155GB used, even though one Instance has 91 GB limit and the other 31 GB limit?



The server only has 128 GB of RAM with a 30+ GB Virtual Swap File.



What do I check to see if there is a problem? What perfmon do I use?



We are testing on this server and the CPUs are only at 5-10% max. Some testing brought the CPUs to 80-90%.



There are no errors.



Thanks,

Thomas

View 2 Replies View Related

A Question About Clustered Indexes Forcing Rebuild Of Non-clustered Indexes.

Sep 18, 2007

So I'm reading http://www.sql-server-performance.com/tips/clustered_indexes_p2.aspx and I come across this:
When selecting a column to base your clustered index on, try to avoid columns that are frequently updated. Every time that a column used for a clustered index is modified, all of the non-clustered indexes must also be updated, creating additional overhead. [6.5, 7.0, 2000, 2005] Updated 3-5-2004
Does this mean if I have say a table called Item with a clustered index on a column in it called itemaddeddate, and several non-clustered indexes associated with that table, that if a record gets modified and it's itemaddeddate value changes, that ALL my indexes on that table will get rebuilt? Or is it referring to the table structure changing?
If so does this "pseudocode" example also cause this to occur:
sqlstring="select * from item where itemid=12345"
rs.open sqlstring, etc, etc, etc
rs.Fields("ItemName")="My New Item Name"
rs.Fields("ItemPrice")=1.00
rs.Update
Note I didn't explicitly change the value of rs.fields("ItemAddedDate")...does rs.Fields("ItemAddedDate")=rs.Fields("ItemAddedDate") occur implicitly, which would force the rebuild of all the non-clustered indexes?

View 4 Replies View Related

Connecting Surface Area Configuration To Server On Clustered Server

May 8, 2006

I've run into a problem after upgrading production servers running under Microsoft Cluster Server, Windows Enterprise Server 2003 SP1, and SQL Server 2005 SP1 Enterprise Edition.

Once I completed the upgrade and applied the patch, I needed to examine the values set in the Features component of the Surface Area Configuration tool. The tool attempts to connect to localhostinstancename, but reports the following error:

An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error:26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)(Microsoft SQL Server)

I'm logged into the virtual server via Remote Desktop, but the SAC tool thinks I'm logged into the physical server supporting the virtual server. I seem to be caught between a rock and a hard place here, as I can't enable remote connections without first gaining access on the server itself.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Restore Clustered Server Into Single DR Server

Aug 18, 2015

I'm working to test out a recovery scenario involving a SQL 2008 R2 2 node cluster.  I want to restore it to a standalone server.  The nodes are VMware VMs using physical RDM for the shared storage.  Using Veeam as the backup tool.  Veeam doesn't work with physical RDM so I'm dumping the databases (all Simple) elsewhere to be picked up and replicated with Veeam.  No problem there.  For my DR I have a vanilla 2008 R2 server being replicated so that I can use it as a base to restore SQL.  So far the testing has worked ok.  What I'm trying to learn is the best way to restore the cluster to the standalone server and have it look the same to the affected app servers.  

The cluster has several instances.  In my testing, I've recreated the instances, but I don't think they show up as they do on the cluster.  For example, if the Windows server name is SQL01, and I install an instance called SQL-APP, SELECT @@servername while connected to the instance still shows SQL01 but in production it shows SQL-APP. What do I need to do to get everything to match up?  I suspect that, while I haven't seen any problems, there could be something I'm missing that would manifest itself later. 

Also, in testing, am I better off to delete the cluster server account from AD and join the domain with the DR server under the same name?  (this is an isolated bubble so no impact on production).For the purpose of this scenario, assume all other required servers (DC, DNS, application, etc.) are present in the test environment as they would be in production and nothing requires resources outside the bubble.  The only item affected is the SQL cluster.

View 7 Replies View Related

Upgrading Standalone 2005 Server To A Clustered Server

May 15, 2007

I have attached the SAN, configured the Windows Clustering and I'm ready for SQL. SQL Server 2005 was already on this machine as a stand alone. I removed all of the software and I'm reinstalling SQL. The cluster option is not enabled. Any ideas why?

View 1 Replies View Related

MBSA Tool In A Clustered SQL Server

Nov 8, 2004

Hello,
Has anyone attempted to use the MBSA 1.2.1 tool in a clustered SQL Server 2000 SP3 environment? Is this possible?

The tool connects, sees the services, verifies the sa password vulnerability, but when it gets to the "sysadmin" issue, it returns the following error: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][Shared Memory]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.

I am logging on with the domain user with admin rights locally to the virtual SQL Server.

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL 2k Enterprise Edition On W2K CLustered Server

Apr 4, 2002

I am trying to configure a 2 node SQL cluster. MSCS is configured and is failing over correctly, however when I start the installation of SQL Server, and specify the IP address of the virtual server and hit next, the installation hangs, and stops responding. I have ran comclust.exe on both nodes and verified that MSDTC shows up in the cluster administrator. I have searched high and low to no avail---

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Monitoring Clustered Server

May 7, 2014

What are the events to be monitored for a Active/Passive Cluster?

View 4 Replies View Related

How To Reboot A Clustered SQL Server Agent

Jun 11, 2007

If I am running SQL Server 2005 in a clustered environment, what is the safest way to restart the SQL server agent? It is currently running but I need to restart it for maintenance purposes.



Is the safeway way to restart is to login to the SQL Server Management Studio as the system administrator, select the SQL Server Agent object, right-mouse click and select "Restart?"

View 2 Replies View Related

Both Versions Of SQL Server In A Clustered Environment

Oct 4, 2007



I am looking at combining / consolidating some of our servers and was wondering if I can install SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 in a clustered Environment on a san.
Cheers
Angie

View 6 Replies View Related

Replication Of SQL Server In Clustered Environment

Aug 9, 2006

We are running 2 SQL Server and both run in failover clustered Environment.
The Problem is now we need to Replicate a Database from one Virtual SQL Sever to the other.

The Second one (clusterd environment)is stroing their database localy while the First One (clustered environment)is storing database in a shared storage.
Note that Both Server are used for sperate purpose , but we now need to set replication on the Other Clustered Setup for Reporting Purpose.

Will it work if we configure replication from One SQL Server Clustered Setup to the Other Clstered Setup.
If yes, then please let me know how it can be done ?

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Both Clustered And Non-Clustered On The Same Field

Jan 3, 2008

Does creating both a Clustered and Non-Clustered  on the same field increase performace or decrease performance?
Or having either one is enough?

View 1 Replies View Related

Clustered/non-Clustered Index

Dec 6, 2005

What does an index add to the performance?
Why do we use Clustered Index and Non-clustered Index?
 
thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Non Clustered And Clustered On Same Column

Jun 10, 2008

Dear All,
i've observed one particular table, one column is having clustered and non clustered index. is it ok? or i need to drop the non clustered column?

the table has 16 columns and at present 8 million records are there. per day approxmately 60000 rows will be getting into the table. it has another 3 non clustered indexes.

please suggest me.

Arnav
Even you learn 1%, Learn it with 100% confidence.

View 2 Replies View Related

Clustered And Non-clustered Indexes

Feb 18, 2006

hi,

how clustered indexes and non-clustered indexes been saved in memory?

non-clustered is a table of a references to the actual table?

and what about clustered indexes?

thanks.

View 1 Replies View Related

Urgent!! - SQL Server Failing On A Clustered Environment -

Oct 10, 2001

Hello,

Yesterday, our server 'failed over' to the passive node in our clustered environment. We are running Windows NT, with MSSQL 7.0. What triggered the fail over, according to the logs, was an error in tempdb. Basically, the error said that tempdb could not be expanded, (could not create any more space for tempdb).

The drive that tempdb database is located on has more than enough room. The tempdb is set at 300M, and can grow to over 700M. The drive that tempdb is on
has over 19Gig of space on it.

One other important piece of information is that the drive where our production database is on and the tempdb is quite full. The 19 gig that is left over represents only about 5 percent of the disk.

Can anyone shed some light on why the sql server would have failed over when trying to expand tempdb, when there was sufficient resources to handle that growth? Am I barking up the wrong tree? Could this be another error? When we restarted the server (both nodes and the disk array) the production database came back as suspect. Most of the stuff in BOL points to the space issue. The production database is around 37 gig.

Any help would be appreaciated

thanks,

jim

View 1 Replies View Related

Why MDTC Doesn&#39;t Work On Clustered Server?

Sep 20, 2000

View 3 Replies View Related

Migrate Form Stand Alone To Clustered Server

Apr 17, 2006

Here is the scenario:
We have an existing production non clustered SQL 2000 server instance that we need to migrate to a new clustered SQL 2000 server instance. We need to accomplish this without affecting the FQDN that applications use to call this server. I found this article on a solution to rename the server after an xcopy of the entire db structure. Here is the link http://vyaskn.tripod.com/moving_sql_server.htm. The other issue that we are trying to resolve is the time it takes for the snapshots of replication to run (in our case almost a full day). That is why this approach looked like it may be a good solution for us.


Here is the question:
Is it possible to move our existing database to a new clustered environment without having to change the FQDN that other applications use to access this database and without having to reinitialize replication?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved