ConnectionRead (WrapperRead())

Feb 8, 2005

When executing an sp from the Analyzer, I get the following:

[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionRead (WrapperRead()).
Server: Msg 11, Level 16, State 1, Line 0
General network error. Check your network documentation.

I don't get this with other procedures, nor do the eventlog from w2k or errorlog from SQLServer indicate something is wrong. The procedure that I call, calls another procedure which gives this error. When I call that procedure directly, I do not get this (or any other) error.

Any idea?

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Xp_cmdshell && WrapperRead() Error

Nov 14, 2004

Hi all,

SQL Server 2000 SP3a, SAN Connection, Standard Edition, 2000 Server edition OS.

I've implemented a log shipping program on one set of sql servers already, the SVR1 set, which are working fine.
I am implementing this on the SVR2 set and I have the wrapperread() problem.
All using SP3a, with MDAC version outlined below. All are reported to be running the SP1 Refresh.

SVR1 - 2.7 SP1 Refresh
SVR1_DR - 2.7 SP1 Refresh

SVR2 - 2.7 SP1 / 2.7 SP1 Refresh
SVR2_DR - 2.7 SP1 / 2.7 SP1 Refresh

When executing the command below in T-SQL I get the error below.
EXEC @sentok = master.dbo.xp_cmdshell @cmd

[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][Named Pipes]ConnectionRead (WrapperRead()).
Server: Msg 11, Level 16, State 1, Line 0

Any help would be gratefully accepted.

Regards,
JS

View 1 Replies View Related

ConnectionRead(recv()) Error Help

Nov 23, 2004

I keep getting this error while I run my application. I used to run the application but it was taking to long so I decided to add some stored procedures to it and this error started happening.

Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionRead (recv()).

Does anyone know what this error is referring to?


Jose

View 1 Replies View Related

[TCP/IP Sockets] ConnectionRead (recv()) Error

Aug 9, 2001

Has anyone encountered this error and found a solution?
A batch process received this error for the first time last night.
We are running SQL 7 on an NT4 server, and the client machine is a Win2K box.
The process is a VB application, using ADO to connect to the database.
We are using TCP/IP protocol.
We were using the Named Pipes protocol in the past, but changed to TCP/IP a few weeks ago, because we kept getting a "ConnectionWrite(GetOverLappedResults)" error, and found information that stated the error was due to the Named Pipes protocol, and the solution was to switch to TCP/IP.
FYI, since switching protocols we have not seen the ConnectionWrite(GetOverLappedResults) error, and we used to get it everytime the process ran.

Any help or suggestions are appreciated.
If any further information about our systems or the process would help, let mw know and I will provide it.

Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

The Call To WinSock Originated From Dbnetlib!ConnectionRead+3b6

Sep 12, 2006

Hi,

I have Problem of asp.net 1.1(win2003SerSP1) Hanging And Crushing Dail More than 5 times, Ok when i use debugdiag to trace errors i recieve those two errors. so it cames every debugdiag i generate.

The following threads in w3wp.exe__DefaultAppPool__PID__4684__Date__09_12_2006__Time_09_08_02AM__173__IIS Hang Dump.dmp are waiting on data to be returned from another server via WinSock.

The call to WinSock originated from dbnetlib!ConnectionRead+3b6

( 2 )

33.33% of threads blocked


when i go thread 2 it gives me this message
Thread 2 - System ID 5448





Entry point
mscorsvr!ThreadpoolMgr::intermediateThreadProc

Create time
9/12/2006 9:02:39 AM

Time spent in user mode
0 Days 0:0:0.328

Time spent in kernel mode
0 Days 0:0:0.203



This thread is waiting on data to be returned from another server via WinSock.

The call to WinSock originated from dbnetlib!ConnectionRead+3b6





Function
Source

ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet


ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+c


mswsock!SockWaitForSingleObject+19d


mswsock!WSPRecv+203


ws2_32!WSARecv+77


wsock32!recv+31


dbnetlib!ConnectionRead+3b6


27c0829




27ba269







9 client connection(s) in w3wp.exe__DefaultAppPool__PID__4684__Date__09_12_2006__Time_09_08_02AM__173__IIS Hang Dump.dmp have been executing a request for more than 90 seconds.
Please see the Client Connections section of this report for more detailed information about the connection(s).



the socond one list some pages. but the problem for my side is how to solve the first error.

So, Please Any one who can give me hints where to go, i checked internet and i didn't find.

Thanks Feisal

View 3 Replies View Related

SSPI Context / [DBNETLIB][ConnectionRead (recv()).] General Network Error

Dec 28, 2006

Hello together,


since over a week I've been looking to
find out the reason for two error messages I get from our users and
servers, unfortunately without success up to now.



I really hope you can help me.



We are using Win 2k servers with active directory and SQL Server 2000,
clients are all Win XP with SP2. Versions of access are 2002 &
2003. The errors are userspecific and occur in both versions. The
SQL-Servers are accessed with an adp-file in 2002-format.



We have one usergroup which is member of specially many groups. This
affects the size of their windows access token which becomes constantly
larger. In order to enable those users to still access their mailboxes
on our Exchange servers, the DWORD entry "MaxTokenSize" with the
decimal value "65535" was made to the newly created key "Parameters" of
their registry branch
"HKLMSYSTEMCurrentControlSetControlLsaKerberos ".



Since then those users can not access any of our SQL Servers using the
windows authentification. One of them gets the error
"[DBNETLIB][ConnectionRead(recv().] General network error. Check your
network documentation.", the others the error "Check connection:
Failed: Cannot generate SSPI context".



In case of resetting the registry entries (by deleting them), the one
user receives the same error message as the rest while it doesn't make
any difference to those (but at least they can't connect to their
mailboxes).



After having researched the web, I realised in one of the SQL-Servers
logfiles the entry "Invalid buffer received from client.." which lead
me to start to believe it could have to do something with the kerberos
encryption in the first place. Therefore I asked if changes to the
tokensize had been made. I applied the change with "EXEC sp_configure
'network packet size', 65535 RECONFIGURE" on our testsystem and "EXEC
sp_configure" confirms that the value is run.



Consequence: The entry in the SQL Server log doesn't appear any longer, but the users still receive their error messages.





Do you have any hints?



Your comments will be highly appreciated!



Regards,

caracol

View 10 Replies View Related

[DBNETLIB][ConnectionRead (recv()).]General Network Error. Check Your Network Documen

Sep 30, 2004

Hello all,

We have a Windows 2003 Web Edition server serving a site through IIS. It connects to a Windows 2003 Standard Edition server running SQL 2000 SP3a.

This site receives the following error as seen in the topic:
[DBNETLIB][ConnectionRead (recv()).]General network error. Check your network documentation.

We've configured the server network utility to only allow TCP/IP connections. The connection string for the site is as follows:

<%
' FileName="Connection_ado_conn_string.htm"
' Type="ADO"
' HTTP="false"
' Catalog=""
' Schema=""
MM_connSpankMSSQL_STRING = "Provider=sqloledb;Data Source=SERVER_IP,1433;Network Library=DBMSSOCN;Initial Catalog=ourmaindb_1;User ID=ourmaindb_1;Password=hotcookies;"
%>

Any ideas or tips on solving this issue? We've noticed it is due to larger queries as smaller ones do work with no problems.

The servers are behind a BSD box running iptables, has 1433,1434 along with standard web ports wide open. Anything outbound is allowed.

Some further testing via ODBC on the IIS server improved things. No more connection pooling for the SQL Server driver allows for 1/3 of the query to run. Still 2/3s of it doesn't show up, and that general network error message appears.

Should have 330 rows if it works right.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved