I would like a simple statement to select some rows and then update them. I would like to use SERIALIZABLE locking, will this do the trick. Below is my TSQL
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
begin tran
select * from patient_medication_dispersal_ where ddate =
convert(char(10),getdate(),101)
update patient_medication_dispersal_
set rec_status = 1 where ddate =
convert(char(10),getdate(),101) and rec_status =1
commit tran
We’re creating a program and need some advice about locking. The program will select data for the user to view; the user may or may not then perform an update on the set. There exists a possibility of another user attempting the same operation at the same time. Thus we want to have the first user lock the data set and the second to be able to select only until the first is complete. We’ve run some tests using the UPDLOCK hint. It works as expect except for the blocking. If a connection attempts to create another Update Lock after another connection has one, then the new connection is blocked. We’re looking for a way to let the program know that an update lock is in existence before it tries to create a new one. The sp_lock procedure can display all the locks, but you can not select specific values (i.e. select any update locks on ObjectID = x). Do any of you know another way or how we can use sp_lock for our purpose?
Thanks in advance.
I am trying to run a simple update statement that updates around 1 million records on SQL Server 2005. For example:
update customers
set CustCode='AAB'
where CustType=72
I would like to update the table WITHOUT locking. In this case, there is no need to have "all or nothing" transactions. If it does a partial update and then fails, it's ok to only have half the records updated.
The server is using up a lot of resources creating and releasing the locks. Plus users are getting locked out of the records during the update. I know this is by design, but in this case it's OK. I know I can use the "set transaction isolation level READ UNCOMMITTED" statement to fix the select statements from getting blocked, but there are way too many places that would have to be changed. Plus there are other updates to this table that need to be locked.
So here is my question: Is there a way to do a transaction-less update?
Thanks,
Stuart Fox
This is probably a very simple question but i would appreciate some helpwith the correct syntax for and update stored procedureI have created user form that allows the user to update the name and address fields in a datatable called customers based on the input value customer ID = ( datatable/Customers)customerIDI have got this far and then got lost:Create SP_UpdateCustomer(@customerID, @name, @address)As Update customers ( name, address)Where customerID = @customerID GOCould anyone tell me what the correct sntax should be.many thanksMartin
View 3 Replies View RelatedConsider the below script
CREATE TABLE #TEMP(Id int,CreatedBy varchar(30),ModfiedBy varchar(30))
CREATE TABLE #TEMP2 (ID int,SearchedBy varchar(30))
INSERT INTO #TEMP VALUES(1,'James',NULL)
INSERT INTO #TEMP VALUES(1,'James','George')
INSERT INTO #TEMP VALUES(1,'James','Vikas')
INSERT INTO #TEMP2(ID) VALUES(1)
INSERT INTO #TEMP2(ID) VALUES(1)
INSERT INTO #TEMP2(ID) VALUES(1)
Now i want to get the result as
;WITH CTE AS(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY Id ORDER BY ID ASC) AS RowNum ,*
FROM #TEMP
)
SELECT CASE WHEN RowNum=1 THEN CREATEDBY
WHEN RowNum > 1 THEN ModfiedBy
END
FROM CTE
But when i convert this select to update, i am missing something...
My update is
;WITH CTE AS(
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY Id ORDER BY ID ASC) AS RowNum ,*
FROM #TEMP
)
UPDATE #TEMP2
SET SearchedBy =CASEWHEN RowNum=1 THEN CREATEDBY
WHEN RowNum > 1 THEN ModfiedBy
END
FROM CTE
WHERE #TEMP2.ID=CTE.ID
Only the first record gets updated...
I have a main table called Stock for example.
One process ( a service ) inserts data into this table , as well as updates certain fields of the table periodically.
Another process ( SQL Job ) updates the table with certain defaults and rules that are unknown to the service - to deal with some calculations and removal of null values where we can estimate the values etc.
These 2 processes have started to deadlock each other horribly.
The SQL Job calls one stored procedure that has around 10 statements in it. This stored proc runs every minute. Most of them are of the form below - the idea being that once this has corrected the data - the update will not affect these rows again. I guess there are read locks on the selecting part of this query - but usually it updates 0 rows - so I am wondering if there are still locks taken ?
UPDATE s
SET equivQty = Qty * ISNULL(p.Factor,4.5) / 4.5
FROM Stock s
LEFT OUTER JOIN Pack p
on s.Product = p.ProductId
AND s.Pack = p.PackId
WHERE ISNULL(equivQty,0) <> Qty * ISNULL(p.Factor,4.5) / 4.5
The deadlocks are always between these statements from the stored procedure - and the service updating rows. I can't really see how the deadlocks occur but they do.
Another suggestion has been to try and use an exists before the update as below
IF EXISTS( SELECT based on above criteria )
( UPDATE as before )
Does this reduce the locking at all ? I don't know how to test the theory - i added this code to some of the statements, and it didn't seem to make much difference ?
Is there a way to make a process ( in my case the stored procedure ) - give up if it can't aquire the locks rather than being deadlocked - which leads to job failures and emails etc ?
We are currently trying to filter down the data that is updated to be only the last few months - to reduce the amount of rows even analyzed - as the deadlocking does seem to be impacted by the number of rows in the tables.
Hi guys,
I faced problem related to Locking and Isolation Level on Table(s).
My problems is there r some tables which r frequently updated, and I also want to fire select query over those tables every 1 seconds and want to get only committed records.
In current scenario we start transactions with ReadCommitted Lock for updating records. But in this scenario I can€™t get select query result because of some of recourses r used by transactions so after some time it gives Deadlock error.
So I want solution like both operation run simultaneously and get only committed records at a time of transaction running
Please help me for solving my problem.
SQL Ver: 2008 (not r2)
Problem: The following code returns correct results when moving variable declarations and update statement outside a stored procedure, but fails to return a value other than zero for the "COMPANY TOTAL" records. The "DEPT TOTAL" result works fine both in and outside the sp.This may have to do with handling NULL values since I was getting warning message earlier involving a value being eliminated by an aggregate function involving a NULL. I only got this message when running inside the sp, not when running standalone. I wrapped the values inside the SUM functions with an ISNULL, and now return a zero rather than NULL for the "COMPANY TOTAL" records when running inside SP.All variable values are correct when running.
SQL CODE:
DECLAREÂ
    @WIPMonthCurrent date = (SELECT TOP 1 WIPMonth FROM budxcWIPMonths WHERE ActiveWIPPeriod = 'Y')
  select @WIPMonthCurrent as WIPMonthCurrent
 Â
[code]....
I've created C#.net program (behind code style).
when I run it in Internet explorer, the following error occurs in IE window.
pls instruct me how to handle and correct this error.
And how to initialize the connectionstring... Great thank!
Server Error in '/' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ConnectionString property has not been initialized. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: The ConnectionString property has not been initialized.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[InvalidOperationException: The ConnectionString property has not been initialized.] System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +809 CodeBox.BehindCode.getSubject() +80 CodeBox.BehindCode.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +31 System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +67 System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +29 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain() +724
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.0.3705.0; ASP.NET Version:1.0.3705.0
I have a simple while process to use with a trigger to insert values
into another table. IN VB this was simple but the while in TSQL seems
a little different. If anyone can point out my flaw greatly appreciated.
while @cnter < @nodays
--insert values
insert into table values (value1, value2)
--then increment counters and repeat
set @sdate = @sdate + 1
Set @cnter = @cnter + 1
How or what is the best way to loop back?
If you start receiving continuous error messages by e-mail indicating that the transaction log is full. After 2 days, the messages suddenly stopped. What could be the reason?
Windows NT App log is full or SQL Server Agent stopped
I think SQL Server Agent stopped
How do you think..and why ?
thanks
If you start receiving continuous error messages by e-mail indicating that the transaction log is full. After 2 days, the messages suddenly stopped. What could be the reason?
Windows NT App log is full or SQL Server Agent stopped
I think SQL Server Agent stopped
How do you think..and why ?
thanks
Im new to SQL so please bear with me & help me as to why Im not getting the desired results.
I want to find the difference between two sets of tables that reside in different databases but contain the same data.
I ONLY WANT
a. records that are only in A but not in B
b. records that are only in B but not in A
______________________________________________________________________
Here is what I wrote using something that I found in this forum -
CREATE PROCEDURE RPT_DETAILS
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @Rowcount AS INT
DECLARE @First_Name AS VARCHAR(50)
DECLARE @Last_Name AS VARCHAR(50)
DECLARE @Id AS INT
CREATE TABLE #Prowess(ID INT NOT NULL, First_Name VARCHAR(50), Last_Name VARCHAR(50))
CREATE TABLE #SDK(ID INT NOT NULL, First_Name VARCHAR(50), Last_Name VARCHAR(50))
INSERT INTO #Prowess
SELECT bb.beenumber, be.FirstName, be.LastName FROM beebusiness bb
join beeentity be on bb.beebusinessguid = bb.beebusinessguid
INSERT INTO #SDK
SELECT cast(sa_ss as INT), first_name, last_name from ml
SELECT @ROWCOUNT = MAX(ID) FROM #SDK
PRINT '------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
PRINT '------------------------COMPARISION REPORT Between Prowess & SDK--------------------------'
PRINT '------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
PRINT 'TOTAL Difference ('+ +
CAST(@ROWCOUNT AS VARCHAR(50))
WHILE @ROWCOUNT > 0
BEGIN
SELECT @First_Name = First_name, @Last_Name = Last_name, @ID = ID
FROM #Prowess WHERE ID = @ROWCOUNT
PRINT ' * '+@First_Name+@Last_Name
SET @ROWCOUNT = @ROWCOUNT - 1
END
SELECT @ROWCOUNT = MAX(ID) FROM #Sdk
PRINT 'TOTAL Difference ('+ + CAST(@ROWCOUNT AS VARCHAR(50))
WHILE @ROWCOUNT > 0
BEGIN
SELECT @First_Name = First_name, @Last_Name = Last_name, @ID = ID
FROM #Sdk WHERE ID = @ROWCOUNT
PRINT ' * '+@First_Name+@Last_Name
SET @ROWCOUNT = @ROWCOUNT - 1
END
DROP TABLE #Prowess
DROP TABLE #Sdk
END
declare @var varchar(50)
set @var= 'COLUMNNAME'
select ID, a.@var , b.@var
from rooper a
join jim_rooper b on b.id = a.id
join b_rooper bb on bb.id = a.id
where a.@var != b.@var
All that Im trying to do here is instead of using a columnname, Im trying to substitute it with a variable so that it can be referenced at multiple places...
Hi
I am writing T-SQL pls tell me wheather it is correct syntax or not
DECLARE @Chg1 VARCHAR(500)
SET @Chg1 = 'declare @AntID numeric exec casp_Switch_BackupData @AntID = #ANTID#'
SET @Chg1 = REPLACE(@Chg1,'#ANTID#','@AntID')
EXEC (@Chg1)
As I am getting following output
Command(s) completed successfully.
T.I.A
hi!
i want to use IN query like
select ... from ...
where field1 in (...)
and field2 in (....)
when i write query like this, the result is display.
but its wrong.
is it correct?
Dim strsql As String
strsql = "insert into MYENTRY(entryid) "
strsql &= "VALUES ("
strsql &= "'" & strtheEntryid & ")' "
I am not sure if this is correct snytax?
hi
if row.col1 = nothing then ...
instead of (sql2k) if dtssource("col1") = null then...
TIA
Hello to all,
Is it correct way to register my CLR library instead of having T-SQL codes (eg, Strored Procedure, Functions and Triggers) in the database in the following case:
Code security: If my Application (in .NET 2.0) and SQL Server Express in same PC and I have to give Windows-Administrator password to my application-user (to install/unistall some other softwares)
Thanks
PSDCHD
HelloI have having trouble displaying some simple columns in ascending order.I know that the database is populated and I can get the more complex code to work if I display like this: SELECT FName, LName, Town, '<a href="' + url + '">' + Site + '</a>' as LinkFROM Names_DBWHERE FName = 'Tom' And url like 'http:%'ORDER BY LName ASCBut I need a simpler view but I can't get it to workI have tried this:SELECT FName, LNameFROM Names_DBORDER BY LName ASCAnd thisSELECT FName, LNameFROM Names_DBORDER BY LName ASC; And This:SELECT FName, LNameFROM Names_DBORDER BY LName 'ASC' What is wrong with this syntax?ThanksLynn
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to get a year count and a year amount of payments made by a client. Below is my statement, it is not giving a correct count. If a client made more than one payment on the same day it counts it as 1.
What can I do to this statement to get correct totals?
SELECT DISTINCT Client_ID, DATEPART(year,PaymentDate) AS 'Year', SUM(AmountPaid) AS 'TotalYearlyPayments', COUNT(DISTINCT Payment_ID) AS 'YearlyPaymentCount'FROM tblPaymentsWHERE Client_ID = @ClientIDGROUP BY Client_ID, DATEPART(year, PaymentDate)ORDER BY Client_ID, Year
Hi, I'm building a web application in which I want to prevent SQL injection. I'm using stored procedures, and using queries on my app like this:in my database...create proc createStudy@title varchar(200),@text textasinsert into studies values(@title,@text)goand in my web app...query="createStudy '"+titleBox.Text+"','"+textBox.Text+"'"; //title and text boxes are textboxes, createStudy is a stored procedure in my databaseodmccommand cmd = new odbccommand(query,con);con.Open();cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();But before this I do this code:if (titleBox.Text.Contains("Drop") || titleBox.Text.Contains("Delete")) messageLabel.Text="No permissions to do that";else(...my code)Is this ok to prevent SQL injection?!?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi,
This is strange....
I am getting my source data from another system am storing the SaleAmount of each product in a field the data type of which is [decimal](12, 2).
For some products I am getting an exact match (upto 2 decimal places) as compared with my source data BUT for some other products the value before the decimal places is correct but the 2 digits after the decimal place does not match with the source data :confused:
Even if this sounds stupid, can you please guide me. Am i missing some very basic and common sense thing?
Many TIA.
I have a query and I need to check to see if a field is occupied, i.e., it can have anything in it, i just want to see if something is there... this is what I want, but of course, anything isn't the right word here...
and (r.id = 'anything')
I have two tables:
1) Table that holds all available ports.
2) Table that holds users for each port.
There may be times where one user is getting more than one port at a time.
I've built up an ASP .NET page that will display each user its port/s in one table.
On another table I want to display all the other available ports which the user doesn't posses and can buy to own.
My problem is where I try to build up the query. I just can't get all the other ports in normal display.
For example, this is what I need:
Ports table:
1/1
1/2
1/3
1/4
Users table:
User A , 1/1
User A , 1/2
ASP page display:
------------
User A Holds:
1/1
1/2
------------
Available:
1/3
1/4
------------
Of course the Available option is derived from the User Holds query, and just getting the opposit not equal ports, but I just can't get it !
I've tried all kinds of Joins and nesting SELECT queries with no luck.
I hate SQL. I want to die.
I have this sql statement:
SELECT Countries.Name, Companies.ShortName, Persons.FirstName, Persons.LastName, PersonSkills.Skills
FROM PersonSkills INNER JOIN....
How can I choose a certain value from PersonSkills.Skills?
for example, I would like to choose a value from PersonSkills.Skills that matches a certain product. I can do the Max/Min value but the selected value needs to match the product.
The tables that I have are:
PersonSkills:
id, ProductID, Skills
Product:
id, ProductName
Ive been reading and playing around with this without success.
create proc AuthorTable @AuthotID int,
@AuthorName varchar(20),
@AuthorBook varchar(60),
as
insert into dbo.Author
( AuthorID,
AuthorName,
AuthorBook
)
values
( @AuthotID ,
@AuthorName,
@AuthorBook
)
spatle
Hi friends,
I've created one procedure.I'm trying to execute that i got the error message like 'Must declare the scalar variable @series'.
but i declared it already.Table name starts with SI,dont have the fields like series and hono.I dont know how to correct this error.Please help me out.Here is my procedure.
alter proc procinsertAllFields
as
begin
declare @series varchar(10)
declare @hono varchar(5)
declare @tabname varchar(8)
declare @sql nvarchar(500)
if exists (select * from sysobjects where name=ltrim(rtrim('ccno_dir1')))
drop table ccno_dir1
set @sql='create table ccno_dir1(cc_no varchar(20),series varchar(1),
hono varchar(10),denom_code varchar(10),i_date datetime,d_date datetime,
locked varchar(10),csd_no varchar(10),invoice_no int,invoice_date datetime)'--print @sql
exec sp_executesql @sql
declare c cursor
for
select series=substring(name,3,1),hono =substring(name,4,5),name from sysobjects where name like 'si[1-3]_____'
open c
fetch next from c into @series,@hono,@tabname
while @@fetch_status=0
begin
print 'begin'
fetch next from c into @series,@hono,@tabname
set @sql='insert into ccno_dir1(cc_no,series,hono,denom_code,i_date,d_date,locked,csd_no,invoice_no,invoice_date)
select cc_no,series=@series,hono=@hono,denom_code,i_date,d_date,locked,csd_no,invoice_no,
invoice_date from '+@tabname
print @sql
exec sp_executesql @sql
end
close c
deallocate c
end
Thanks in advance!
kiruthika
http://www.ictned.eu
Hello Everyone,
I have the following code:
USE CHEC
SELECT
[DATE_CONVERSION_TABLE_NEW].MONTH,
DAY([DATE_CONVERSION_TABLE_NEW].[DISBURSEMENT DATE]) AS DayofMonth,
DAT01.[_@550] AS LoanType,
DAT01.[_@051] AS Branch,
DAT01.[_@TP] AS ProdTypeDescr,
SMT_Branches.[BranchTranType] AS TranType,
--SMT_Branches.[AUCode] AS AuCode,
Count(*) AS Totals
FROM DAT01 INNER JOIN [DATE_CONVERSION_TABLE_NEW]
--ON DAT01.[_@040] = [DATE_CONVERSION_TABLE_NEW].[DISBURSEMENT DATE]
ON DAT01.[_@040] = [_@040]
INNER JOIN SMT_BRANCHES
ON SMT_Branches.[BranchTranType] = SMT_BRANCHES.[BranchTranType]
WHERE
DAT01.[_@040] Between '06/01/2006' And '06/30/2006'
And SMT_BRANCHES.[BranchTranType] = 'RETAIL'
AND DAT01.[_@051] = '540'
--And SMT_Branches.[AUCode] = '1882'
And DAT01.[_@TP] = '115'
And DAT01.[_@550] = '3'
GROUP BY
DAT01.[_@051],
DAT01.[_@550],
DAT01.[_@TP],
SMT_Branches.[BranchTranType],
SMT_Branches.[AUCode],
[DATE_CONVERSION_TABLE_NEW].MONTH,
DAY([DATE_CONVERSION_TABLE_NEW].[DISBURSEMENT DATE])
ORDER BY [DATE_CONVERSION_TABLE_NEW].MONTH, DAT01.[_@051],
DayofMonth ASC,
SMT_Branches.[AUCode] ASC
--COMPUTE sum(count(*))
Here is a partial display of the results:
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
APRIL13540115RETAIL39
The count is the same everytime. It should be different. What am I doing wrong?
TIA and have a great day!
Kurt
DECLARE @fullname nvarchar(50)
SET @fullname =
(SELECT (OriginalName + ContentType) AS Name
FROM Files_Dyn)
INSERT
INTO Files_Dyn(FullName)
VALUES (@fullname) where username = 'user_admin'
...what is the wrong with this query..it is giving 'Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'where'. Please correct me!
thanks in advance!
Hi.
This is a Stored proc I am working on
I dont know much about stored procs.
This is what I am trying to achieve
The proc takes two input parameter and returns one outparameter.
This is what I have
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetNextAction]
(
@Code char(10),
@Track varchar(30),
@NextAction ntext output
)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
Declare @ID int;
@ID = Select Sequence from [dbo].[Track] where Code=@Code;
Declare @nextCode varchar;
@nextCode= Select Code from [dbo].[Track] where sequence =(@ID+1);
@NextAction= Select nextAction from [dbo].[CaseStage] where Code=@nextCode;
return @NextAction;
END
GO
I guess you can understand what I am trying in the proc but the rules and syntax are wrong. Please help me with this.
Thanks
The documentation saysISNUMERIC returns 1 when the input expression evaluates to a validinteger, floating point number, money or decimal type; otherwise itreturns 0. A return value of 1 guarantees that expression can beconverted to one of these numeric types.(Cut and pasted from books online)Yet the following, one of many, example shows this is not true.select isnumeric(char(9))select convert(int, char(9))-----------1(1 row(s) affected)Server: Msg 245, Level 16, State 1, Line 2Syntax error converting the varchar value '' to a column of data typeint.So, besides filtering every possible invalid character, how do youconvert dirty values without error. I am not concerned that I may loosepossibly valid values or convert suspect strings to 0 (zero). I justwant to run without raising an error
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am loading data from table A into table B. Certain columns in B havecheck constraints. I'd like for any rows from A, which violateconstraints, to be inserted into a third table, C. When the process isfinished, I'll have only good rows in B, and exeption rows in C.I am investigating INSTEAD OF triggers, however my question to thegroup is, is there a better or best practice for this scenario? Thismust be common. Any high-level tips or direction will be highlyappreciated.DAP
View 4 Replies View Related