Hi,
I need to create a new table in our database.
This table is not linked into the existing schema in anyway, so i'm not sure if I need a primary key or not.
either way, coudl anyone tell me how to create a primary key ni the CREATE TABLE statement.
I have tried searching but cannot find the answer.
many thanks,
Matt
This question may be a little complicated.
I am building a DTS Package that is moving data from our webstore (written in house) to a Warehouse Management System(WMS - Turnkey) and I've encountered a problem. both pieces of software have an orders table and an Ordered_Items table, related by the order_ID (makes sense so far). Here is the problem. The primary key on the webstore's Ordered_Items table is a single column (basically an Identity variable), while the primary key on the WMS's Ordered_Items table is a dual column primary key, between the Order_ID and the Order_LineID, so the data should be stored like:
OrderID Order_LineID
1 1
2 1
2 2
2 3
3 1
3 2
4 1
Get the Idea? So I have to create this new Order_LineID column. How can I accomplish this with a SQL statement?
Thanks!!!!!
This is a fairly simple question, but what is the easiest way to:create a new numbered column (where value is simply the row number) inan existing table and setting it as a primary key?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
I am trying to execute following sql script in sql-server 2000 query analyzer
CREATE TABLE user_courses (user_id varchar(30) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
course_id varchar(10) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
Its give's me following error :-
Cannot specify multiple primary key constraint
Hence I am not able to ceate table with multiple primary keys. So can any one tell me how to get this done?.
Secondly, Primary key must be unique i.e duplicate values are not allowed in P.K field. But in this case since I am declaring two fileds as primary keys.
Will it allow me to have following records in the user_courses table?
user_id(P.K) course_id(P.K)
bob CRS235
alice CRS235
Tim CRS235
tom CRS635
So, if we consider both the fields as primary keys together than I am not voilating Uniqueness constraint. But, if I look at course_id alone then I am voilating uniqeness property?
Thanks,
Environment: Microsoft SQL Server Standard Edition (64-bit), 10.0.5520.0
I was doing a code review for another developer and came across this code:
CREATE TABLE dbo.#ABC
(
ReportRunTime DATETIME
,SourceID VARCHAR(3)
,VisitID VARCHAR(30)
,BaseID VARCHAR(25)
[Code] ....
This EXECUTES with no error or warning message.However, if I change this to CREATE the PK in an ALTER TABLE statement, I get the (expected by me) error:
CREATE TABLE dbo.#ABC
(
ReportRunTime DATETIME
,SourceID VARCHAR(3)
,VisitID VARCHAR(30)
,BaseID VARCHAR(25)
,OccurrenceSeqID INT
[code]...
==> Msg 8111, Level 16, State 1, Line 17 Cannot define PRIMARY KEY constraint on nullable column in table '#ABC'.
==> Msg 1750, Level 16, State 0, Line 17 Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
(note: As the #ABC table is an actual copy of a few of the columns in a "permanent" table, I will likely change the definition as follows such that the columns are defined to match the names / datatypes / NULLability:
SELECT TOP 0
CAST('01-01-1980' AS DATETIME) AS [ReportRunTime]
,SourceID
,VisitID
,BaseID
,OccurrenceSeqID
[Code] .....
Hello again,
I'm going through my tables and rewriting them so that I can create relationship-based constraints and create foreign keys among my tables. I didn't have a problem with a few of the tables but I seem to have come across a slightly confusing hiccup.
Here's the query for my Classes table:
Code:
CREATE TABLE Classes
(
class_id
INT
IDENTITY
PRIMARY KEY
NOT NULL,
teacher_id
INT
NOT NULL,
class_title
VARCHAR(50)
NOT NULL,
class_grade
SMALLINT
NOT NULL
DEFAULT 6,
class_tardies
SMALLINT
NOT NULL
DEFAULT 0,
class_absences
SMALLINT
NOT NULL
DEFAULT 0,
CONSTRAINT Teacher_instructs_ClassFKIndex1 FOREIGN KEY (teacher_id)
REFERENCES Users (user_id)
)
This statement runs without problems and I Create the relationship with my Users table just fine, having renamed it to teacher_id. I have a 1:n relationship between users and tables AND an n:m relationship because a user can be a student or a teacher, the difference is one field, user_type, which denotes what type of user a person is. In any case, the relationship that's 1:n from users to classes is that of the teacher instructing the class. The problem exists when I run my query for the intermediary table between the class and the gradebook:
Code:
CREATE TABLE Classes_have_Grades
(
class_id
INT
PRIMARY KEY
NOT NULL,
teacher_id
INT
NOT NULL,
grade_id
INT
NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT Grades_for_ClassesFKIndex1 FOREIGN KEY (grade_id)
REFERENCES Grades (grade_id),
CONSTRAINT Classes_have_gradesFKIndex2 FOREIGN KEY (class_id, teacher_id)
REFERENCES Classes (class_id, teacher_id)
)
Query Analyzer spits out: Quote: Originally Posted by Query Analyzer There are no primary or candidate keys in the referenced table 'Classes' that match the referencing column list in the foreign key 'Classes_have_gradesFKIndex2'. Now, I know in SQL Server 2000 you can only have one primary key. Does that mean I can have a multi-columned Primary key (which is in fact what I would like) or does that mean that just one field can be a primary key and that a table can have only the one primary key?
In addition, what is a "candidate" key? Will making the other fields "Candidate" keys solve my problem?
Thank you for your assistance.
Completely new to SQL so wondered if anyone could help with an issue I'm sure there is a simple answer too.
Need to create a Primary Key for an existing table. Now I have managed to create a new column called _ID, which set the contents to NULL. So populated the column with the number 1 so that I could set it to no null.
Now when I run the query:
ALTER TABLE tablename ADD PRIMARY KEY (_ID);
I get the error:
The CREATE UNIQUE INDEX statement terminated because a duplicate key was found for the object name 'dbo._DATACAPTURE' and the index name 'PK___DATACAPTURE__145C0A3F'. The duplicate key value is (1).
Which is obviously due to the repeated 1 in _ID.
So I am thinking I just need to run a query that fills the _ID with a unique number.
Any ideas how I do that?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Hi
I'm trying to create a composite Primary Key on a table. This is the SQL I've written:
CREATE TABLE BookingItems
(
BookingID INT NOT NULL
REFERENCES Bookings(BookingID),
EquipmentTypeID INT NOT NULL
REFERENCES EquipmentType(EquipmentTypeID),
CONSTRAINT PK_BookingItems_id PRIMARY KEY
(BookingID, EquipmentTypeID)
)
Is this right? I'm trying to define a Primary Key made up of BookingID and EquipmentTypesID, which are both Foreign Keys as defined in the column definition.
Thanks
Jon
Thanks to help from Ray Maio I have been able to create copies of various tables using the Select Into command.
Ray also responded that this command does does not transfer Primary Key and Index information.
I have attempted to create an index by using the following statement:
create nonclustered index SchoolIndx on wrestlerstest (School)
I did not get an error, but can't tell ift the index was created. The question is, how do I find out if
there is an index for the column School? Is there a command that will tell me. I'm just sending commands
to the server via a short .asp program and don't really know how to obtain a message back. Could I find the information
by browsing the
Thanks again in advance,
Greg Zafros
Hi all,I've spent hours trying to find the error in the following SQL 2000command:ALTER TABLE [ClientList] ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_ClientList] PRIMARY KEYCLUSTERED ([PhoneNo]) On [PRIMARY]Every time I try to "Execute" this from my (VB5) ODBC connection I get:Runtime error 3289;Syntax error in CONSTRAINT clauseFor the life of me I can see nothing wrong. I used Enterprise managerto create this statement, and I can create the primary key fine fromthere. The PhoneNo field does not allow NULLs.Everything is service-packed up to date. I have tried using[databasename].[dbo].[ClientList] and suchlike.I've tried to find a relevant manual, but my SQL Server developersguide suggests this should be ok and I can't see anything wrong in thebooks online.Can anybody please help?TIA
View 7 Replies View Related
I'd like to create a primary key value (incremental) within a trigger and set it in a primary key column.
Any idea anyone? Do I define my trigger as a On INSERT, Instead of INSERT? I tried both but it doesn't seem I'm doing things right.
I created table and also I define the primary key its okay
but when I generate the SQL script for that table its not
creating the primary key
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[table1] (
[emp_id] [int] NOT NULL ,
[emp_name] [char] (25) NULL ,
[emp_address] [nvarchar] (50) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
PS: I want to use emp_id as primary key but its not defined in the sql script
Thankx a lot
Hello everyone!
Even though I am not "new to SQL Server", my experience in working with it has ebbed and flowed, and working with SQL Server is not something that happens for me even on a monthly basis.
I work as an in-house programmer for a financial investment company and I have been asked to work on a database that is to hold financial data.
One of the requirements for the tables has been that the Primary Key should be [name_of_the_table] + [Identity].
So, for example, for table "tblEquities", the values of the Primary Key would be:
PK
-------
tblEquities1
tblEquities2
tblEquities3
tblEquities4
tblEquities5
My questions are:
1) Is it possible to achieve this by using just one column, as in defining a formula for the "Computed Column Specification" , something that would look like "'tblEquities' + Identity()"?
2) If the above is not possible, I assume it's much easier to just define a column as being Identity column and then create a 2nd computed column that would aggregate the name of the table with the value in the Identity column, so that I end up with a column holding the desired values? (I guess it would look something like
"'tblEquities' + [Identity]")
Also, I have been asked to find out what SQL 2005 have/offers, in term of guaranteeing referential integrity. Are the "Database Diagram", as well as the "Relationships" dialog box, the tools that would meet that criteria or does SQL 2005 contain other tools that would help in this regard?
Thank you!
Hi,
I have created a very simple table. Here is the script:
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[IndexTable]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1)
drop table [dbo].[IndexTable]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[IndexTable] (
[Id] [int] NOT NULL ,
[Code] [nvarchar] (50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX [CusteredOnCode] ON [dbo].[IndexTable]([Id]) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[IndexTable] ADD
CONSTRAINT [PrimaryKeyOnId] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[Id]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
The records that i added are:
Id Code
1 a
2 b
3 aa
4 bb
Now when i query like
Select * from IndexTable
I expect the results as:
Id Code
1 a
3 aa
2 b
4 bb
as i have the clustered index on column Code.
But i m getting the results as:
Id Code
1 a
2 b
3 aa
4 bb
as per the primary key order that is a non clustered index.
Can anyone explain why it is happening?
Thanks
Nitin
Hello,
I am trying to recreate a primary key that I dropped in a table....
I'm using a statement like
ALTER TABLE temp WITH NOCHECK add CONSTRAINT PK__tempkey PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
num,
store
)
But apparently the "store" column was created without a "not null" and it let it create the PK during the table creation but now it won't let me add the PK with that nullable column..
Does anyone know how to get it to use that column to create a primary key after the initial table creation?
Here is the error i get
Cannot define PRIMARY KEY constraint on nullable column in table
Thanks a lot
I have a varchar column in a table, which is an unique key column. Now when I design this table should I use this column as a primary key or should I add one more Integer column as a primary key column for the performance?
One more point is, when ever I do a search on this table I will search based on that unique varchar column values only, so even then if I add new integer column just for Primary key I will not use this column for searching values.
With these information, can some body help me in deciding this?
I currently have a website which is using ASP.NET 2.0, C#, and SQLServer 2005. The website will be used to enter grants for auniversity. When a new grant is entered, I need to generate a primarykey. The primary key will need to follow the format: Two digit forfiscal year, then number of the grant for that year. Example:Year 08 and 14th grant of the year would be: 0814How can I implement this. Right now, I have a "New Grant.aspx" pagewith a Submit button. I am guessing the date is going to be formattedin C#. How can I check what the last primary key in the database is?Also, it seems to me that SQL Server insists that the primary key be32 bits long, however my primary key will only be 4. How can Ioverride this? Thanks.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHey everyone,
I have just started getting into to SQL and am completely brand new to the whole concepts of relational databases. Someone on this forum pointed to the MSDN videos on LEARNVISUALSTUDIO.NET which have been very helpful. Unfortunately while learning about relational databases and looking at the program that I want to design and make using them, I have run into a pretty big wall, concerning the primary key and foreign key.
For my program, I am trying to save an object, and lets say the base class is SLIDE. Now SLIDE will store basically most of the information that I will ever want to store, such as timeCreated and mainText and slideID(primarykey). But there are other classes that derive from slide that will store just a bit more information than that because of what they are. Lets say there is a class derived from SLIDE called PERSON that stores its parentNode, which is to say something that this slide specifically belongs to and has a reference to. Now the tricky part is that in this program, every single slide can have a reference to another slide, that you would see displayed and that you could just click on and view if you wanted to.
Now relating what I just told about the classes in my program to a relation database standpoint is what confuses me. If I make a table SLIDE, it would hold incomplete data about the PERSON object, because that object has more data than SLIDE has. The answer to this was to make another table called PERSON, which would have more columns. But now we arrive at the big problem: The primary key called maybe SLIDEID would be different in this new PERSON table than in the other table called SLIDE (or any other derived class). Therefore the link between these tables is messed up. In my object orientated mind I am thinking of static class variables that would still stay constant for derived classes, so that when I make a PERSON slide it will increment off of the primary key of the SLIDE table. In other words, is there some sort of super TABLE that you can derive from, like an abstract class, where the primary keys of other tables can build off of because they will be used as the same type of reference to eachother.
If none of this made sense to the reader, I am greatly sorry. I do not really know what else I can say to convey to you the problem I have. Maybe its because I am so used to object orientated languages that this is making it so difficult to explain. If however you do understand what I am talking about, please think about it and help me find a solution to this problem. I am not an experienced programmer, but I do very much enjoy it and I am very excited about starting to make this program, and I have learned that before I start coding it is very important to have a very firm design in mind first.
Thank your for reading,
Jeremy
Discuss the following sql query with respect to performance in an applicaiton involving more number of concurrent users creating and deleting records. The objective is to create continuous primary key integer values.
Table name: SitePage
Column DataType
--------- -----------
PageID BigINT
PageName nchar(10)
Query to insert new record
DECLARE @intFlag INT
SET @intFlag = 0
WHILE (@intFlag =0)
BEGIN
BEGIN TRY
[Code] ....
We don't want to use auto increment integer value for primary key because of the following reason
[URL] .....
We also don't want to use SEQUENCE as we have to create 50 sequence for 50 tables
We can't do trace flag 272
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest me on Adding primary key to a table which has already a primary key.
Thanks,
Jeyam
Hi,
If I want to automatically insert a record which has default value in a table,
how can I create the trigger?
what the best practice is for creating indexes on columns that are foreign keys to the primary keys of other tables. For example:
[Schools] [Students]
---------------- -----------------
| SchoolId PK|<-. | StudentId PK|
| SchoolName | '--| SchoolId |
---------------- | StudentName |
-----------------
The foreign key above is as:
ALTER TABLE [Students] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Students_Schools]
FOREIGN KEY([SchoolId]) REFERENCES [Schools] ([SchoolId])
What kind of index would ensure best performance for INSERTs/UPDATEs, so that SQL Server can most efficiently check the FK constraints? Would it be simply:
CREATE INDEX IX_Students_SchlId ON Students (SchoolId)
Or
CREATE INDEX IX_Students_SchlId ON Students (SchoolId, StudentId)
In other words, what's best practice for adding an index which best supports a Foreign Key constraint?
I need to add a child table that will tell us who the participants counselor is, what I did was I did a Make Table query based off the primary key of the Parent table and made that the link (foreign key) for the People_tbl and the Counselor_tbl, so if the counselor changes then the user adds the record to the counselor tbl and then puts in the Effective date. The problem is that when I run a report it doesn't show the present counselor always shows the old counselor?
Code:
SELECT Student_ind.StudentFirstName, Student_ind.StudentLastName, Student_ind.[Student ID], People_tbl.[Family ID], People_tbl.FirstName,
People_tbl.LastName, People_tbl.[Parent ID]
FROM People_tbl RIGHT OUTER JOIN
Student_ind ON People_tbl.[Family ID] = Student_ind.[Family ID]
WHERE (People_tbl.LastName = @Enter_LastName) AND (People_tbl.FirstName = @Enter_FirstName)
Previously same records exists in table having primary key and table having foreign key . we have faced 7 records were lost from primary key table but same record exists in foreign key table.
View 3 Replies View Related
Hi all,
my stored procedure have one table variable (@t_Replenishment_Rpt).I want to create an Index on this table variable.please advise any of them in this loop...
below is my table variable and I need to create 3 indexes on this...
DECLARE @t_Replenishment_Rpt TABLE
(
Item_Nbr varchar(25) NULL,
Item_Desc varchar(255) NULL,
Trx_Date datetime NULL,
Balance int NULL,
Trx_Type char(10) NULL,
Issue_Type char(10) NULL,
Location char(25) NULL,
Min_Stock int NULL,
Order_Qty int NULL,
Unit char(10) NULL,
Issue_Qty int NULL,
Vendor varchar(10) NULL,
WO_Nbr varchar(10) NULL,
Lead_Time int NULL,
PO_Nbr char(10) NULL,
PO_Status char(10) NULL,
Currency char(10) NULL,
Last_Cost money NULL,
Dept_No varchar(20) NULL,
MSDSNbr varchar(10) NULL,
VendorName varchar(50) NULL,
Reviewed varchar(20) NULL
)
I tryed all below senarios...it is giving error...
--Indexing the @t_Replenishment_Rpt table on the column Names Item Number, Vender , Department Number
--EXEC sp_executesql(CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX Replenishment_index ON @t_Replenishment_Rpt (Item_Nbr))
--CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX Idx1 ON @t_Replenishment_Rpt.Item_Nbr
INDEX_COL ( '@t_Replenishment_Rpt' , ind_Replenishment_id , Item_Nbr )
--EXEC sp_executesql('SELECT INDEXPROPERTY('+ '@t_Replenishment_Rpt' + ', ' + 'Item_Nbr' + ',' + 'IsPadIndex' + ')')
--EXEC sp_executesql(SELECT INDEXPROPERTY('@t_Replenishment_Rpt', 'Vendor','IsPadIndex'))
--EXEC sp_executesql(SELECT INDEXPROPERTY('@t_Replenishment_Rpt', 'Dept_No','IsPadIndex'))
Hi i have set up two very simple tables, I want a user to be able to create a basic account ( data stored in User_Profile table with Id set as the Primery Key as Identity) I
want the user to be able to be able to return to their account at a later date
and then post multiple reviews of different bands they have seen at a later date.
I kept the tables in my example very simple so I could get my head
around the concept, but generally, I want to connect the Id (PK) value in
User_Profile table to the User_Id filed in the User_Review table,
so every review that user writes, will be connected directly to their Id.
Any help you could give would be fantastic a i have no idea where to start!!!
User_Profile
Id int, ( as primary Identity Key)
Name
City
Country
I have a second table called User Reviews
User_Revews
Revew_Id int , ( as primary Identity Key)
User_Id int, ( I want this to contain the Id value in
the User profile Table)
Review_Details
Thanks
Odxsigma
mahesh writes "HI,
I am new to sql server.
can anybody help me
I have a table named tblqualificationmaster.
can i know the foreignkeys and the table related to this
tblqualificationmaster having foeign keys using stored procedure."
Hi,
I have a Users table that I use for membership. I am using username varchar(30) as the primary key for this table since username will always be unique.
The question I have is regarding how SQL Server actually stores data:
I see that when I add users, they are always stored alphabetically sorted on username.
I was expecting that all users will appear on the users table in the order they were added.
Example: I have 3 users (john, jonah, wilson). Now I added 4 user with username='bob'
If I execute select * from users, it returns me (bob, john, jonah, wilson). Look bob has become the first row of the table.
My question: Is Sql server moving 3 older rows to make room for 'bob' and it is also rebuilding part of the index due this new username 'bob'?
If this is the case, then it will have big impact if I have 100K users and I add one user that becomes firstrow. In that case 99,999 rows will have to move.
Bottom line, insert, delete will be very expensive.
I know sql server keeps data physically sorted on PK. But I am concerned here since rows are losing the order in which they were inserted.
Thanks
Banti writes "IF i create temporary table by using #table and ##table then what is the difference. i found no difference.
pls reply.
first:
create table ##temp
(
name varchar(25),
roll int
)
insert into ##temp values('banti',1)
select * from ##temp
second:
create table #temp
(
name varchar(25),
roll int
)
insert into #temp values('banti',1)
select * from #temp
both works fine , then what is the difference
waiting for ur reply
Banti"
Using SQL against a DB2 table the 'with' key word is used todynamically create a temporary table with an SQL statement that isretained for the duration of that SQL statement.What is the equivalent to the SQL 'with' using TSQL? If there is notone, what is the TSQL solution to creating a temporary table that isassociated with an SQL statement? Examples would be appreciated.Thank you!!
View 11 Replies View RelatedThere is a restriction that we must have only one primary key per table. We can have composite primary key by defining primary key over 2 or more columns. Actually,, a primary key uniquely defines the table and if we have two or more columns which follow unique and not null features why can't we have two primary keys?? I want to know what is the main reason behind having only one primary key in a table??
View 3 Replies View RelatedI ran into a table that is used a lot. Well less than100,000 records. Maybe not a lot of records but i believethis table is used often. The table has 26 fields, 9 indexesbut no Primary Key at all!There are no table relationships defined in this database, noNatural keys, only Surrogate keys in the database.1- Maybe an odd question but is it normal to have 1/3 of thetable's fields as indexes? Is this a valid question or it reallydoesn't matter if you have 9 indexes if they are appropriate to beindexes?2- Below is the DDL of the indexes (Is DDL the appropriate termto describe the indexes?) Without going into too technical aboutwhat the table is, what relationships it has with other tables,would you be able to tell if the indexes are good, bad, too many,etc?3- If i open the table in DESIGN view in SQL EM, i don't seethe Primary key icon. Yet here i see the words "PRIMARY KEYNONCLUSTERED". Does this mean UNIQUENO is actually some typeof primary key? If it was CLUSTERED then SQL EM would showUNIQUEID with a key to the left it identifying it as a PK?If that is the case, then what is the difference betweenPRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTEREDandPRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED?CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX [TBLTEST_PK] ON[dbo].[TBLTEST]([UNIQUENO]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOCONSTRAINT [PK_TBLTEST] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED([UNIQUENO]) ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE UNIQUE INDEX [ASSIGNUNIQUENAME] ON[dbo].[TBLTEST]([USERNO], [STARTDATE], [NAME]) WITHFILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE INDEX [ENDDATE] ON [dbo].[TBLTEST]([ENDDATE]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE UNIQUE INDEX [IUSERASSIGNACT] ON[dbo].[TBLTEST]([USERNO], [TASKNO], [PROCESSENTRYNO])WITH FILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE INDEX [STARTDATE] ON [dbo].[TBLTEST]([STARTDATE]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE INDEX [PROCESSENTRYNOTBLTEST] ON[dbo].[TBLTEST]([PROCESSENTRYNO]) WITHFILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GO/****** The index created by the following statementis for internal use only. ******//****** It is not a real index but exists asstatistics only. ******/if (@@microsoftversion > 0x07000000 )EXEC ('CREATE STATISTICS [Statistic_NAME] ON[dbo].[TBLTEST] ([NAME]) ')GOCREATE INDEX [TASKNO_IDX] ON [dbo].[TBLTEST]([TASKNO]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE INDEX [TBLTEST_ORGANIZATIONNO_IDX] ON[dbo].[TBLTEST]([ORGANIZATIONNO]) WITHFILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOCREATE INDEX [TASKNOUSERNO] ON [dbo].[TBLTEST]([USERNO], [TASKNO]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 80 ON [PRIMARY]GOThank you
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi to all.
I have a table with about 8 columns as a primary key. I would like to delete one column but not destroy the other 7 primary keys and their relationships between the other tables. Is it possible to do this?
Thanks.