In the Operating environment databases, may be made tables in the database on a temporary basis but they are still yet and they are not removed, how to identify tables that have been made on a temporary basis are not used (don’t have any read & write records)?Â
View 2 RepliesIn the Operating environment databases, may be made tables in the database on a temporary basis but they are still yet and they are not removed, how to identify tables that have been made on a temporary basis are not used (don’t have any read & write records)?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHello,
Can anyone shed some light on why the following:
declare @str varchar(2000)
set @str = 'SELECT * INTO #TmpTable FROM FormHistory'
exec (@str)
SELECT * FROM #TmpTable
gives the following error:
Invalid object name '#TmpTable'.
This is a very cutdown version of what I am trying to achieve so it might not seem obvious why I am writing it into a string and using exec but in the real code I do need to do this. I have cut it right back to try to get to the bottom of why this doesn't work. I suspect the # in the string is causing the problems.
Thanks for any help
Firstly I consider myself quite an experienced SQL Server user, andamnow using SQL Server 2005 Express for the main backend of mysoftware.My problem is thus: The boss needs to run reports; I have designedthese reports as SQL procedures, to be executed through an ASPapplication. Basic, and even medium sized (10,000+ records) reportingrun at an acceptable speed, but for anything larger, IIS timeouts andquery timeouts often cause problems.I subsequently came up with the idea that I could reduce processingtimes by up to two-thirds by writing information from eachcalculationstage to a number of tables as the reporting procedure runs..ie. stage 1, write to table xxx1,stage 2 reads table xxx1 and writes to table xxx2,stage 3 reads table xxx2 and writes to table xxx3,etc, etc, etcprocedure read final table, and outputs information.This works wonderfully, EXCEPT that two people can't run the samereport at the same time, because as one procedure creates and writesto table xxx2, the other procedure tries to drop the table, or read atable that has already been dropped....Does anyone have any suggestions about how to get around thisproblem?I have thought about generating the table names dynamically using'sp_execute', but the statement I need to run is far too long(apparently there is a maximum length you can pass to it), and evenbreaking it down into sub-procedures is soooooooooooooooo timeconsuming and inefficient having to format statements as strings(replacing quotes and so on)How can I use multiple tables, or indeed process HUGE procedures,withdynamic table names, or temporary tables?All answers/suggestions/questions gratefully received.Thanks
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone know how to identify the hottest, most active tables in adatabase?We have hundreds of users hitting a PeopleSoft database with hundredsof tables. We are I/O bound on our SAN, and are thinking of puttingthe hottest tables on a solid state (RAM) drive for improvedperformance. Problem is: which are the hottest tables? Would like todo this based on hard data instead of developer/vendor guesses.Any suggestions are much appreciated.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe database I'm currently working with is very old and some of thetables, SP, and views are not being used. I'm looking for a way toidentify what items are no longer in uses, or what items arecurrently in use.
View 4 Replies View RelatedBeen poking around, but how can I tell if a an identity column exists in a table?
View 10 Replies View RelatedHello,
I am working with a database that among other things uses multipart keys as the unique indexes which are not consistent from say one table where a parent record resides to another table which contains related child records. For example I am working with two tables right now, one that contains content that I'll call Contents and the other which contains Usage information about the contents (number of view, a rating and comments give by a customer) which I'll call ContentsUsage. The system that manages the data for the tables has a versioning system by which, whn a content item is added (first time) a "unique" id (guid) and a version number of 1 is created along with the rest of data items in the Contents table and likewise in the ContentsUsage table (essentially a one to one mapping) on the like named fields in that table. Now, each time a given record in the Contents table is updated a new version, with the same guid is created in the Contents and ContentsUsage table. So one side I have:ContentGUID > AAAAVersion > 1ContentGUID > AAAAVersion > 2And the other table (ContentsUsage)ContentGUID > AAAAVersion > 1ContentGUID > AAAAVersion > 2
While both of these tables have a quasi-unique record (row_id) of type char and stored as a guid neither obviously are the same in the two tables and having reviewed the database columns for these tables I find that the official unique key's for these tables are different (table 1, Contents combines the ContentGUID and Version) as the composite / mutli-key index, while table ContentsUsage uses the RowGUID as it's unique index.
Contents RowGUID (unique key)ContentGUIDVersionViewsRatingComments................RowGUID ContentGUID (unique key)Version (unique key)Description.....
Bearing this in mind I am unable of course to link directly the two tables by using the just the ContentGUID and have to combine the additional Version to I believe obtain the actual "unique" record in question. The question is in terms of writing queries, what would the most efficient query be? What would be the best way to join the two in a query? And are there any pitfalls with the current design that you can see with the way this database (or specifically these tables are defined)? It's something I inherited, so fire away at will on the critique. Having my druthers I would have designed these tables using a unique key of type int that was autogenerated by the database.
Any advice, thoughts or comments would be helpful.
Thanks,P.
I am very new to SSAS. I have two queries:
1) As per my project requirement, if the changes in SSAS cube are approved, they should be committed back to the actual SQL Server 2012 tables. Is that possible, if yes how?
2) For rolling back to original data I truncate the relevant writeback table and process the cube.
I'm using MS SQL Server 2008 and I'm trying to figure out if it is possible to identify what tables / columns contain specific records.
In the example below information generated for the end user, so the column headers (Customer ID, Customer, Address, Phone, Email, Account Balance, Currency) are not necessarily the field names from the relevant tables, they are simply more identifiable headers for the user.
Customer ID CustomerAddress Phone Email Account Balance Currency
js0001 John Smith123 Nowhere Street555-123-456 jsmith@nowhere.com-100 USD
jd2345 Jane Doe 61a Down the road087-963258 jdoe@downthe road.com-2108 GBP
mx9999 Mr X Whoknowsville 147-852369 mrx@whoknows.com0 EUR
In reality the column headers may be called eg (CustID, CustName, CustAdr, CustPh, CustMail, CustACBal, Currency).
As I am not the generator of this report, I would like to know whether or not it is possible to identify the field names and / or what tables they exist in, if I were to used the report info to search for it. For example, could I perhaps find out the field name and table for "jd2345" or for "mrx@whoknows.com", because the Customer ID or Email may not be what the actual fields are called.
I'm not a DB admin and I don't have rights to do a stored procedure on the server. I'm guessing what I want is not so simple to do, but is it possible to do via a query?
we run 2008 std edition (I believe r2 on this server, will double check) and I need to find a needle in a haystack.
I am looking at two tables and would like to learn which, if any objects on same db updates these tables.  I'd even live with any references to these tables. I already know sql agent is out of the picture. I'm looking for a static approach, not a monitoring one because its possible updates don't occur till month end.
Is there a way in sql server to query the answer to such a question using dmvs or something like dmvs?  What if I get bold and want to search all db's on this server for objects that update my two tables even across dbs?
In the mean time, i'll look at scripting all triggers and procs , and doing a search on these table names in the scripts.Â
I don't know that I've ever seen a way to script all triggers before. Procs I can easily script from the object explorer details. But I'm not sure if in explorer details--> server objects --> triggers does what I hope it does.
I'm writing an application using VB 6.0 as the front-end GUI, and theMSDE version of SQL Server as the back-end (it's a program for areally small # of users --- less then 3-4).I'm trying to determine, through the Visual Basic interface, thepermissions of each user that's using the application on his/hermachine.For example, let's say I'm user "Michael" that's sitting down at mymachine using the app. I've written. The security for logging intoSQL Server will be setup using Windows Security (Trusted Connection)as opposed to Windows & SQL Server security. When Michael accesses aparticular form in the VB 6.0 GUI, I want to run some code thatautomatically checks Michael's permission levels on the underlyingtable (actually, a stored procedure supplying the data from the table)that supplies the data to the form he's looking at and then give himsome feedback on the form as to what type of permissions he has whilehe's browsing through the data shown in the form.For example, Michael opens a particular form, code in the backgroundis run to identify that this is Michael accessing the form, the codereturns a value that identifies what type of permissions he has on thedata in the form, and a text box on the form informs Michael (forexample) that he only has read-only permissions to the data he isviewing and cannot edit any of the data.As another example, user Karen sits down at her computer, logs intothe application, opens the same form that Michael just opened, thecode is run in VB to detect the level of permissions she has on thedata being displayed in the form, and the text box on the form informsher that she has editing permissions on the data in the underlyingtable.Etc...If anyone can post an example of the code they use in accomplishingthis task in an application they've written, I'd really appreciate apoint in the right direction or a real-world example that's beenimplemented by one of you. I've written several apps. thus far usingMSDE as the back-end, but the previous apps. I've written were forclients that didn't care about restricting access to theapplication... everyone could pretty much use the application as theydesired and do anything they desired to the data.The current client I'm writing the app. mentioned here for wants tohave security in place to where various users access the applicationwith various levels of permissions to do stuff (or *not* do stuff) tothe data in the application.Thanks very much in advance for any assistance / code provided!Sincerely,Brad McCollumJoin Bytes!
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan you create a temporary table using an ad-hoc query?
What I am trying to do is a type of filter search (the user has this and this or this) were i will not know how may items the user is going to select until they submit....that is why i can't use a stored procedure(i think)....any help on how to do this?
Thanks,
Trey
Hi could anyone give me a hint what does term "temporary table" mean regarding sql server?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi all,
how can i execute this query without errors??
create table #luca(c int)
drop table #luca
select * into #luca
from anagrafica_clienti
The error lanched is:
Server: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 1, Line 6
There is already an object named '#luca' in the database.
Why if i drop the table?How can i do?Thanks guy
Afternoon.
I'm having trouble with a query and ASP. The query itself is easy. I need a temporary table to be filled with the contents of a select and then i need to select out of the temporary table and return the results to the ASP.
So:
Code:
DECLARE @RESULTS TABLE (
ItemID int,
ItemDescription char(50),
ItemType int,
ItemRequestedBy char(50),
ItemStatus int,
ItemQuantity int,
ItemCostPer money,
ItemOrderNumber int,
DateAdded smalldatetime,
DateLastEdited smallDateTime
)
INSERT into @results (ItemID, ItemDescription, ItemType, ItemRequestedBy, ItemStatus, ItemQuantity, ItemCostPer, ItemOrderNumber, DateAdded, DateLastEdited)
SELECT * from cr_EquipmentData
SELECT * from @results
When I run this in Query Analyser, I get exactly the results I need... But when I try and run the ASP script, I get an error about the recordset not being open. (It's not the ASP checking 'cos when I run a simple select statement it works)
I appreciate there is no use for the query as it stands, but eventually I want to be able to perform not destructive statements on the @results table before returning the data to ASP. This is more 'testing' than anything at the mo'
Has anyone got any ideas?
Thanks...
I am writing a stored procedure that outputs it's information to a temporary table while it assembles the information. Afterwards, it returns the contents of the temporary table as the results of the stored procedure.
I found that if you create the table, inside the SP, as an ordinary table, the information builds to that table considerably faster than if you use a true temporary table.
I found that if I create a user function that returns a table as it's return value, it is also as slow as if I used a true temporary table.
The database can amass over 2 million records in one table in just a few days. If I have the procedure query against this table, and output to an ordinary table it creates, and summarize the information it is adding to the table, then it takes an average of around 4 minutes to return the results from the query. If I change the output table to a temporary table (#temp), it between 12 and 15 minutes. Nothing else in the procedure changed. Just the kind of table. If I take the logic and move it to a function which returns those results in a RETURN table, it also takes over 14 minutes.
Why would it take so much longer outputing to a temporary table rather than a normal table? Is it because temporary tables are stored in a different database (tempdb)? Why would returning query results from a function be just as slow?
How can I view logs of local (to a session) temporary that are created/dropped?
View 6 Replies View RelatedHi,
I am trying to join two tables usig two temporary tables.I want the Output as table2/table1 = Output
Select temp2.Value/temp1.Value as val
from
(
(
select count(*)as Value from [Master] m
inner join [Spares]s on s.SId=m.SID
where m.Valid_From between '2007-06-01' and '2007-06-30'
)temp1
Union
(
select isnull(sum(convert(numeric(10,0),s.Unit_Price)),'0') as Value
from [Order] h
inner join [Spares] s on s.Number = s.Number
where h.Valid_Date between '2007-06-01' and '2007-06-30'
))temp2
as t
I could not find the output..
Plz help me..
Thanks..
Hello,
Our java application is running on oracle and now we would like to port it to sql server 2000. In oracle we have a global temporary tables that has an option on commit to delete rows.
Now I am looking for the same option in sql server but as far as I can see sql server's local temporary tables are visible per connection. Since the connection are shared in the pool it seems I can not rely on local temporary tables since the connection does not get closed at the end of the user's session. I need something that is visible per transaction not per connection.
Is it a better approach just to create a regular table and basically have a trigger to delete all data on commit?
If a stored procedure invokes another stored procedure that creates atemporary table why can't the calling procedure see the temporary table?CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.GetTempASCREATE TABLE #Test([id] int not null identity,[name] as char(4))INSERT INTO #Test ([name]) VALUES ('Test')CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.TestASEXEC dbo.GetTempSELECT * FROM #Test -- Invalid object name '#Test'.Thanks,TP
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi, just a quick question regarding performance and speed.Q. Run a complicated query three times or create a TEMPORARY table andaccess it as needed?I have a page where it will be accessed 10,000+ a day.In that page I have an SQL query where it involves 3 different tables(approximate table sizes T1) 200,000 T2) 900,000 T3) 20 records)I'll be running that query 3 times in that page...One to retrieve the content and display it on the page.Second to count the number of records (using COUNT(*) function)And third to retrieve the content regions. (using DISTINCT function)What would be the best way of doing...Running the SQL query 3 timesOrCreate a temporary table and access it as many time as I needRegards,
View 4 Replies View RelatedHello,
I would like to know from other members whether they are successful in using temporary tables within a stored procedure and use that stored procedure in a report.
My scenario is like this:
I have a stored procedure A which fetches the data from different tables based on the orderno passed as input parameter.
I have built another stored procedure B with a temporary table created and inserting the rows in to this temporary table based on vendor related specifc orders by calling the above procedure A.
I have used this stored procedure in the dataset created and getting this error:
Could not generate a list of fields for the query. Check the query syntax, or click the Refresh Fields on the query toolbar.
Does anybody encountered this and have a resolution.
Thanks in advance.
Hello,
View 6 Replies View RelatedHi All
declare @temp table
([EVENT_TYPE_ID] [int],
[Desc] [nchar](50) NOT NULL,
[Lead_Time] [smallint] NULL)
INSERT @temp
SELECT *
FROM TBL_EVENT_DEFINiTION
The table definition for @temp is the same as TBL_EVENT_DEFINiTION. The problem is I need to add a field to the @temp table and define the values using an update statement. If I include the additional field in the @temp table declaration then I get an error saying something to the effect of the number of fields is different. Is there a way of altering the temporary table to add this field?
Many thanks in advance
Alex
Hello!
I'm creating a temporary table in a procedure to help me with some calculations. I would like the name of the temporary table to be 'dynamic', I mean, to have the hour it was created, something like this: create table #myTempTable15May11:10:00, so if someone access the procedure while it's running, he won't have problems in creating his 'own' temporary table (create table #myTempTable15May11:10:02). Is there anyway I can do this?
Thank you!
Hello,
I tried to make a DTS to transform data in a text file, I used a Store Procedure that use a temp table (#Resultados) but the DTS give me an error.
I read that in this case I can´t use local temp tables but I can use global temp tables, then I changed in my Store, #Resultados by ##Resultados, bu the result was the same.
My Store is likely to his. Please help me.
INSERT ##Resultados (Planta, Etapa,GrupoEquipo,Equipo,Concepto,Fecha,Guardia,
Valor,idConcepto)
EXEC CalculosDiarios @Area,@Reporte,@FechaIni,@FechaFin,0
SELECT LEFT(RP.Grupo,3) + LEFT(RP.Equipo,12) + LEFT(RP.SubGrupo,2)
+ LEFT(D.Fecha,8) + D.Valor as Dato
FROM
ReportesPlantilla RP
LEFT JOIN
##Resultados D
ON
RP.Planta = D.Planta
AND RP.Etapa = D.Etapa
AND RP.GrupoEquipo = D.GrupoEquipo
AND RP.Equipo = D.Equipo
AND RP.Concepto = D.Concepto
AND D.Fecha BETWEEN @FechaIni AND @FechaFin
Can some one tell me how to display the fields of temporary table in the report? In the query a global temp table is created and in the end i am displaying the fields of that table. How do i do that?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have some questions regarding Temporary tables.
I need to use a temporary table within a stored procedure (which is a transaction), should I use local temporary table or global temporary table?
If I use a temporary table in my transaction, do I destroy the temporary table at the end of the transaction, or just leave it, and let the sytem clean it up? If I destroy the temporary table at the of the transaction, what happens if another user session is accessing the temporary at the very moment?
Thanks.
Cathie
I am searching for information on paging large datasets, and have found
some that involve creating temporary tables in the database.
Before I head off and implement something, I have a number of issues
I'd like to bounce around here.
1. An example I found on MSDN involves creating a temporary table,
copying relevant columns to the row in the temp table. Why do
this, rather add the source tables primary keys into the temp table,
and do a join? Example; browsing Products Catalog which is
categorised into hierarchies. The MSDN version would have a temp
table created with a incrementing field which is used for the paging,
and then a number of fields are also copied from the products table to
the temp table - my question is why not simply copy the product primary
key into the temp table, and then join?
2. In real life, do people allow each user to create their own
temporary tables? If I have 1000 concurrent users, all wishing to
perform a page-based browse, I would be creating 1000 new temporary
tables. Do people consider default temp tables, that is, creating
a default temporary table for browsing each category in the products
table, for example?
3. Do you have any advice/tips for this type of problem?
Thanks!
JR.
In Access 97/2000, a local table can be created in the program database, while the data is stored in a linked database. This is useful for me to do a sort-of iterative drill-down on linked tables, e.g. filter table1 into table2, then further filter table2 into table3 and so on.....
If I do this I leave a trail that I can navigate in reverse (back up a step).
This is very important in my app.
So now my problem is....I'm trying to duplicate this in an ADP file using only ADO 2.5. I have no local tables, only server tables. If I create a temporary table, it only exists until the procedure ends.
Is there any way to create temporary tables that are specific to a user session and do not automatically delete themselves, or is there a better way to do this in SQL7?
on sql-server-performance.com i read :
Do not create temporary tables from within a stored procedure that is invoked by the INSERT INTO EXECUTE statement. If you do, locks on the syscolumns, sysobjects, and sysindexes tables in the TEMPDB database will be created, blocking others from using the TEMPDB database, which can significantly affect performance. [6.5, 7.0, 2000] Added 9-1-2000
I have a question does this negative effect also include simple SQL commands apart from stored procedures.
For example if from vb i execute a "Select into" temporary table. Will this have the same negative impact as with executing this from a stored procedure ?
Thank you very much
I have created a local temporary table (#Temp) and placed data in it.When I do:SELECT * #TempThe result is a set of rows with no columns.The SELECT statement is in the same procedure as the creation of #Temp; so Idon't believe this is a scoping issue. Does that make sense?Thank you in advance,Eric
View 3 Replies View Related